External validity of the chiari severity index and outcomes among pediatric chiari I patients treated with intra- or extra-Dural decompression

Preoperative Predictors of Foramen Magnum Decompression with Dural Splitting for Amelioration of Syringomyelia Associated with Chiari Type 1 Malformation

OBJECTIVE

Among several procedures for syringomyelia associated with Chiari type 1 malformation (CM-1), foramen magnum decompression (FMD) with dural splitting is one of the treatment choices with low complication rates. However, some meta-analyses have suggested that FMD with dural splitting may be inferior to FMD with duraplasty based on clinical outcomes; therefore, a predictor of a good surgical outcome with dural splitting is essential. This study aimed to clarify the preoperative parameters for good outcomes in patients with FMD with dural splitting, including the volumetric perspective.

METHODS

We reviewed the cases of patients diagnosed with CM-1 and syringomyelia who underwent FMD with dural splitting at our institution. We included patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging from 6 months to 1 year after surgery and measured radiological parameters using preoperative computed tomography and preoperative/follow-up magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Among all radiological parameters, the volume of the herniated tonsils (Vtonsil) in improved group was significantly smaller, and the difference between the expected volume increment and Vtonsil (Vincr-Vtonsil) in improved group was significantly larger than those in non-improved group. To predict the improvement of the syrinx, Vincr-Vtonsil of 0.77 mL was the optimal cutoff value and yielded 100% sensitivity and 48.0% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Vtonsil and Vincr-Vtonsil, which are novel predictors based on the volumetric perspective, might be the optimal predictors for improvement of the syrinx associated with CM-1 by 1 year after surgery.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Patients With Chiari Malformation: Surgical Interventions

BACKGROUND

Chiari malformation type I (CIM) diagnoses have increased in recent years. Controversy regarding the best operative management prompted a review of the literature to offer guidance on surgical interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the literature to determine (1) whether posterior fossa decompression or posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty is more effective in preoperative symptom resolution; (2) whether there is benefit from cerebellar tonsillar resection/reduction; (3) the role of intraoperative neuromonitoring; (4) in patients with a syrinx, how long should a syrinx be observed for improvement before additional surgery is performed; and 5) what is the optimal duration of follow-up care after preoperative symptom resolution.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the National Library of Medicine/PubMed and Embase databases for studies on CIM in children and adults. The most appropriate surgical interventions, the use of neuromonitoring, and clinical improvement during follow-up were reviewed for studies published between 1946 and January 23, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 80 studies met inclusion criteria. Posterior fossa decompression with or without duraplasty or cerebellar tonsil reduction all appeared to show some benefit for symptom relief and syrinx reduction. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether duraplasty or cerebellar tonsil reduction was needed for specific patient groups. There was no strong correlation between symptom relief and syringomyelia resolution. Many surgeons follow patients for 6-12 months before considering reoperation for persistent syringomyelia. No benefit or harm was seen with the use of neuromonitoring.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based clinical guidelines for the treatment of CIM provide 1 Class II and 4 Class III recommendations. In patients with CIM with or without syringomyelia, treatment options include bone decompression with or without duraplasty or cerebellar tonsil reduction. Improved syrinx resolution may potentially be seen with dural patch grafting. Symptom resolution and syrinx resolution did not correlate directly. Reoperation for a persistent syrinx was potentially beneficial if the syrinx had not improved 6 to 12 months after the initial operation. The full guidelines can be seen online at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/3-surgical-interventions .

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Dura-Splitting versus Duraplasty Techniques in Pediatric Chiari I Malformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Type I Chiari malformation is a developmental anomaly with various proposed surgical techniques for its management. The dura-splitting technique is a less invasive approach and involves the resection of the outer layer of the dura while sparing the internal layer. While this less-known approach may minimize the complication rates, there are concerns about its efficacy and outcome. Therefore, we have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available data on clinical and radiological outcomes of this technique in the pediatric population and compared them to the foramen magnum decompression and duraplasty technique. We have followed the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines in this review. Based on our predefined search strategy, we performed a systematic database search. Subsequently, the article screening process was done based on defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Following the quality assessment of included studies, two authors performed data extraction. Finally, the extracted data were summarized and presented in form of tables. Forest plots were used to demonstrate the results of the meta-analysis. A review of 8 included studies consisting of 615 patients revealed the significant advantage of the dura-splitting technique in terms of shorter operation duration and hospital stay. The recurrence rate and clinical and radiological outcomes were almost similar between the two surgical techniques. Complication rates were significantly lower in the dura-splitting technique. Dura-splitting can be an effective and safe approach for the management of pediatric Chiari I malformation. However, these results are mostly extracted from observational studies and future randomized controlled trials are recommended.

Individualized surgical treatment of Chiari 1 malformation: A single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with an individualized surgical approach to treat Chiari malformation type 1.

METHODS

Based on (1) neurological symptoms, (2) the existence and extent of a syrinx and (3) the degree of the tonsillar descent we performed four types of approaches on a case-by-case basis in 81 patients: (1) foramen magnum decompression (FMD) with dura splitting (FMDds); (2) FMD with duraplasty (FMDdp); (3) FMD with duraplasty and tonsillar manipulation (FMDao); and (4) tonsillar resection/reduction (TR). Patient characteristics, Chiari Severity Index (CSI), fourth ventricular roof angle (FVRA) and Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

CCOS was between 13 and 16 points in 8/11 (73 %) patients after FMDds, 38/45 (84 %) patients after FMDdp, and 24/24 (100 %, one patient lost to follow-up) patients after TR. We experienced an overall complication rate of 13.6 % (11/81) in this series, whereas seven of these eleven complications (64 %) occurred in the FMDao group and the complication rate increased with the invasiveness of the approach (0 % FMDds; 4 % FMDdp; 12 % TR).

CONCLUSION

Given the clear correlation between the extend of the approach and the complication rate the least invasive approach necessary to achieve clinical improvement should be selected. Due to the high complication rates, FMDao should not be used as a treatment option. The severity of the tonsillar descent, basilar invagination and current CM1 scores could be used to aid in the approach selection.

Foramen magnum decompression for Chiari malformation type I - UK surgical practice

Background: Symptomatic Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) is a common condition in Neurosurgery. Surgery involves hindbrain decompression and restoration of CSF flow through different surgical approaches. No Class 1 evidence exists to suggest the superiority of any of the surgical techniques.Aims: To investigate current surgical practice for symptomatic CM1 patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and determine the willingness to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing different surgical techniques.Methods: An electronic survey was sent to consultant members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and the British Chiari-Syringomyelia Group. The questions covered pre-operative and intra-operative management, presence of equipoise/uncertainty in optimal technique and willingness to participate in an RCT.Results: 98 responses were received. 67% operate on adults. 30% on adult and paediatric patients. There is variation in routine pre-operative use of: ICP monitoring (18%), flexion/extension x-rays (16%), venography (20%) and ophthalmology assessment (26%). 18% of neurosurgeons would not offer foramen magnum decompression when the presenting symptom is only refractory cough/sneeze headache. 15% routinely perform bony decompression alone in adults vs 8% in children. In 68% of adult cases, durotomy is performed routinely (46% of them leave the dura open, 54% perform a type of duroplasty) and 16% routinely resect the cerebellar tonsils. Only 17% leave the dura open in children. The most common indicators for durotomy are syringomyelia and intra-operative ultrasound findings. 61% believe there is equipoise/uncertainty in the optimal strategy for decompression and would be willing to participate in an RCT. Comments also mention the heterogeneity of CM1 and that treatment should be tailored to each patient.Conclusion: There is wide variation in pre- and intra-operative management of CM1 patients in the UK and the majority of neurosurgeons would be willing to participate in an RCT comparing bony decompression alone vs dural opening with/without duroplasty.

The management of Chiari malformation type 1 and syringomyelia in children: a review of the literature

In anticipation of the "Chiari and Syringomyelia Consensus Conference" held in Milan in 2019, we performed a systematic literature review on the management of Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) and syringomyelia (Syr) in children.We aimed to summarize the available evidence and identify areas where consensus has not been reached and further research is needed.In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we formulated seven questions in Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) format. Six PICOs concerned CM1 children with/without additional structural anomalies (Syr, craniosynostosis, hydrocephalus, tethered cord, and cranio-vertebral junction anomalies), and one PICO Syr without CM1. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and NICE databases from January 1, 1999, to May 29, 2019. Cohort studies, controlled and randomized clinical trials (CCTs, RCTs), and systematic reviews were included, all pertinent only to patients ≤ 18 years of age.For CM1, 3787 records were found, 460 full texts were assessed and 49 studies (46 cohort studies, one RCT, and two systematic reviews) were finally included. For Syr, 376 records were found, 59 full texts were assessed, and five studies (one RCT and four cohort studies) were included. Data on each PICO were synthetized narratively due to heterogeneity in the inclusion criteria, outcome measures, and length of follow-up of the included studies.Despite decades of experience on CM1 and Syr management in children, the available evidence remains limited. Specifically, there is an urgent need for collaborative initiatives focusing on the adoption of shared inclusion criteria and outcome measures, as well as rigorous prospective designs, particularly RCTs.

Comparative Assessment of Three Posterior Fossa Decompression Techniques and Evaluation of the Evidence Supporting the Efficacy of Syrinx Shunting and Filum Terminale Sectioning in Chiari Malformation Type I. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of posterior fossa decompression (PFD), posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty (PFDD), and posterior fossa decompression with resection of tonsils (PFDRT) in Chiari malformation type I (CMI). Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the evidence supporting the efficacy of filum terminale sectioning (FTS), syringosubarachnoid shunting (SSS), and syringoperitoneal shunting (SPS) in CMI.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were screened for English-language studies published from inception until August 11, 2020. A total of 3593 studies were identified through the searching process. Fifteen cohort studies were included in the systematic review and network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

No studies concerning FTS, SSS, and SPS were found eligible. Therefore, only PFD, PFDD, and PFDRT were compared. PFDD showed significantly higher incidence of complications (relative risk [RR], 3.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.54-5.64) cerebrospinal fluid leak (RR, 9.74; 95% CI, 2.33-40.78) and neurologic deficit (RR, 8.76; 95% CI, 2.08-36.90) than did PFD. Both PFDD and PFDRT achieved higher syringomyelia improvement (RR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.09-1.39 and RR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.15-1.51, respectively) and greater clinical improvement (RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.10-1.39 and RR, 1.24, 95% CI, 1.08-1.44, respectively) than did PFD. No differences were found between PFDD and PFDRT.

CONCLUSIONS

PFDD and PFDRT are superior to PFD, especially in patients with syringomyelia-Chiari complex, because of greater syringomyelia reduction and better clinical improvement. However, PFDD and PFDRT can be considered equally efficient. There is no evidence pleading in favor of SFT, SSS, and SPS over any PFD technique.

Chiari type I malformation: role of the Chiari Severity Index and Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to determine whether the Chiari Severity Index (CSI), and other clinical variables, can be used as a predictor of postoperative outcomes for Chiari type I malformation (CM-I) using the modified Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (mCCOS) as the postoperative measure.

METHODS

The cohort included patients 18 years of age and younger who were treated for CM-I between 2010 and 2015 who had at least 12 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. CSI grades were assigned using preoperative clinical and neuroimaging data. Clinical, radiographic, and operative data were obtained from medical records. Kruskal-Wallis tests and Spearman correlations were conducted to assess for differences among CSI grades. Linear and ordinal regressions were conducted to evaluate predictors of the mCCOS and its components. Statistical significance was set a priori at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included in the final cohort. The average age at the time of surgery and the mean mCCOS score were 9.8 ± 4.9 years and 10.4 ± 1.4, respectively. There were no significant differences in the mean mCCOS scores or CSI grades. Pre- and postoperative syrinx sizes were similar across the total patient cohort with median sizes of 7.4 and 3.7 mm, respectively. After controlling for age at the time of surgery, whether duraplasty and/or arachnoid dissection was performed, CSI preoperative score did not predict postoperative mCCOS score. No clinical variable could predict total mCCOS score. When the mCCOS was broken down into 3 subcomponents (pain, non-pain, and complications), only one relationship was identified. Those patients who presented with no headache had a statistically significant decrease in their pain (neck pain, shoulder pain, or dysesthesia in the upper extremities) as measured by the pain component of the mCCOS (χ2 [2, n = 20] = 6.43, p = 0.04). All other preclinical predictors, including CSI grades, were nonsignificant in demonstrating correlations to the mCCOS subcomponents.

CONCLUSIONS

CSI grade was not found to be a marker of surgical outcome as measured by the mCCOS in this study. There were no correlations between the clinical variables and covariates investigated with the mCCOS. The lack of variation in mCCOS scores across this cohort may suggest that the mCCOS is not adequate for detecting differences in postsurgical outcomes. Further investigation is warranted to make this determination.

Management opinions from different centers (Rio de Janeiro)

INTRODUCTION

The surgical treatment of Chiari type 1 (CM1) malformation is controversial and depends largely on the preference of the surgeon. The evolution of neuroimaging resulted in an increased number of asymptomatic patients incidentally diagnosed.

PURPOSE

To study retrospectively a population of 24 symptomatic patients with CM1 operated between 1999 and 2017 in which intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS)-assisted posterior fossa-C1 decompression was used to decide whether the dura mater should be opened (CVD+) or not (CVD).

RESULTS

Most of the patients complained of headache or neck pain, 15 had hydrosyringomyelia and 14 had some spinal cord involvement. Patients were categorized in improved, unchanged, or worse according the preoperative signs and symptoms. Overall, 19 patients improved, 3 deteriorated, and 2 remained unchanged. Among these, 4 out 5 had syringohydromyelia.

CONCLUSIONS

IOUS-assisted posterior fossa-C1 decompression is our preferred option to treat CM1. Children submitted to intradural procedures, initially or subsequently, had increased postoperative complications. CSF fistula or pseudomeningocele was the major cause of complication. The final result seems to correlate with the preoperative neurological status.

Outcomes and complications for individual neurosurgeons for the treatment of Chiari I malformation at a children's hospital

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and complications for individual surgeons at British Columbia Children's Hospital for the treatment of Chiari I Malformation (CMI) in children.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with CMI who had surgery from 1986 to 2015. We assessed the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scores (CCOS) and complication rates by surgeon.

RESULTS

Seventy patients, 38 males and 32 females, underwent posterior fossa decompression including 14 extradural and 56 intradural approaches. Syringomyelia was present in 74.3%. Most syringomyelia improved with no difference between intradural and extradural surgeries. After initial surgery, 13 patients (18.6%) had complications including 2/14 (14.3%) of extradural and 11/56 (19.6%) of intradural surgeries. Two patients required surgical intervention for complications whereas 11 had transient complications. The complication rate by surgeon ranged from 11 to 20% for extradural (2 surgeons only) and 10.5 to 40% for intradural surgeries (4 surgeons). The CCOS ranged from 12 to 15 for extradural and 6 to 16 for intradural. The CCOS ranges for surgeons 1 and 2 were 12-15 and 13-15 respectively for extradural. The CCOS ranges for surgeons 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 12-16, 6-15, 12-16, and 12-16 respectively for intradural. Thirteen patients had a second surgery for CMI. The final CCOS was good in 86% and moderate in 14%.

CONCLUSION

There was variability in surgeries performed at BCCH by different surgeons, with variations in CCOS and complication rates. This information is important during decision making, consent process, and for quality improvement.

International survey on the management of Chiari 1 malformation and syringomyelia: evolving worldwide opinions

INTRODUCTION

In 2003, pediatric neurosurgeons were surveyed under the auspices of the education committee of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ISPN) to determine prevailing opinions regarding the management of Chiari I malformation (C1M) with and without associated syringomyelia. In the ensuing years, there has been further information from multiple C1M studies, with regards to indications, success rates of different surgical interventions, and complications. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate current opinions and practices in pediatric C1M.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pediatric neurosurgeons worldwide were surveyed, using an e-mail list provided by the ISPN communication committee chairperson. Respondents were given scenarios similar to the 2003 C1M survey in order to determine opinions regarding whether to surgically intervene, and if so, with which operations.

RESULTS

Of 300 surveys electronically distributed, 122 responses were received (40.6% response rate)-an improvement over the 30.8% response rate in 2003. Pediatric neurosurgeons from 34 different countries responded. There was broad consensus that non-operative management is appropriate in asymptomatic C1M (> 90%) as well as asymptomatic C1M with a small syrinx (> 65%). With a large syrinx, a majority (almost 80%) recommended surgical intervention. Scoliotic patients with CIM were generally offered surgery only when there was a large syrinx. There has been a shift in the surgical management over the past decade, with a bone-only decompression now being offered more commonly. There remains, however, great variability in the operation offered.

CONCLUSION

This survey, with a relatively strong response rate, and with broad geographic representation, summarizes current worldwide expert opinion regarding management of pediatric C1M. Asymptomatic C1M and C1M with a small syrinx are generally managed non-operatively. When an operation is indicated, there has been a shift towards less invasive surgical approaches.

Predictive Factors of Headache Resolution After Chiari Type 1 Malformation Surgery

BACKGROUND

Headache is the main and often isolated symptom of patients with Chiari type 1 malformation (CM1). Classically described as occipital and exacerbated by cough, headaches may be poorly characterized, making it difficult to establish CM1 as the underlying cause. Current guidelines for surgical posterior fossa decompression are undefined. The challenge is to distinguish headaches related to CM1 from headaches coincidentally coexisting with CM1. We aimed to determine predictive factors of headache resolution after surgery and applied to our cohort the Chiari Severity Index, a recently developed predictive prognostic score.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 49 patients with CM1 and preoperative headache. Standardized telephone interviews regarding headaches before and after surgery were conducted by the same neurologist; magnetic resonance imaging morphometric analyses were performed by an independent neuroradiologist. Headache resolution was defined as ≥50% reduction in frequency of headache days.

RESULTS

Preoperative factors of headache resolution after multivariate analysis were attack duration <5 minutes (P = 0.001), triggering by Valsalva maneuvers (P = 0.003), severe intensity of attack (P = 0.05), occipital location (P = 0.05), and greater number of headache days per month (P = 0.04). These characteristics are part of International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for headache attributed to CM1. No radiologic predictive factor was demonstrated. Postoperative improvement was inversely correlated with Chiari Severity Index.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the relevance of International Headache Society criteria to identify headaches related to CM1. We propose their systematic use in a preoperative questionnaire.