Cranial ultrasound is a reliable first step imaging in children with suspected craniosynostosis

Tranexamic Acid: Safeguarding Children with Craniosynostosis from Bleeding. A Review Article

Craniosynostosis is a congenital condition characterized by the premature closure of one or more sutures in the skull after birth, often necessitating urgent surgical intervention. Nevertheless, cranial vault reconstruction surgery can cause rapid and massive blood loss. This procedure requires a blood transfusion, which entails potential hazards. In addition, the hemostatic system in children differs significantly from that in adults, resulting in increased bleeding during surgical procedures. We conducted a comprehensive literature review in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, referring to their inception for studies on the use of tranexamic acid in pediatric craniosynostosis surgery. Selection criteria were based on the relevance of tranexamic acid, its clinical efficacy, and its safety profile in pediatric populations. Authoritative reviews were considered to ensure a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge and practice trends in the field. We determined that a low loading dose of 10 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg/h is as effective as a high dose of 50 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg/h of tranexamic acid when administered after induction of anesthesia through skin closure and can reduce blood loss by up to 72% and total packed red blood cell transfusion by up to 85%. No difference in safety profile is observed. We concluded that a low dose of tranexamic acid, administered as a loading dose followed by a maintenance dose, is beneficial and safe for reducing blood loss and transfusion following craniosynostosis surgery.

Imaging approach to pediatric calvarial bulges

Palpable calvarial lesions in children may require multi-modality imaging for adequate characterization due to non-specific clinical features. Causative lesions range from benign incidental lesions to highly aggressive pathologies. While tissue sampling may be required for some lesions, others have a typical imaging appearance, and an informed imaging approach facilitates diagnosis. This review illustrates imaging findings of common and clinically important focal pediatric calvarial bulges to aid the radiologist in narrowing the differential diagnosis and directing appropriate referral. We focus on birth-related lesions, congenital abnormalities, and modeling disturbances (i.e., those that produce a change in calvarial contour early in development), normal variants, and neoplastic lesions with their mimics.

Predictive Value of Sonographic Parameters on the Effects of Cranial Molding Helmet Therapy in Infants with Positional Plagiocephaly

Positional plagiocephaly is a deformational cranial flattening frequently treated in pediatric neurosurgical practice. Positional maneuvers and orthotic helmet therapy are preferred therapeutic options for moderate-to-severe forms. Treatment response seems to be age-dependent. Nevertheless, predictive data are vague, and cost-efficiency might be a limiting factor for treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the early predictive value of sonographic parameters on the efficacy of orthotic helmet therapy through the assessment of changes in skull shape and correlation of the parameters with caliper cephalometry values and with age. A consecutive cohort of 49 patients < 10 months of age, undergoing orthotic helmet therapy for positional plagiocephaly, was recruited prospectively. The authors routinely assessed the patency of the lambdoid sutures by ultrasound and the following additional skull parameters were measured: suture width, adjacent full bone thickness, adjacent cortical bone thickness and occipital angle. Caliper cephalometric values, as well as demographic and clinical data were collected. Retrospective data analysis showed an inverse relation between both cortical and full skull bone thickness and early treatment efficacy, defined by a reduction in the occipital angle. The improvement of sonographic parameters correlated with the development of cranial caliper cephalometry values. In conclusion, the sonographic assessment of skull bone thickness is a safe and cost-effective tool to predict the early efficacy of orthotic helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly and might, therefore, help the clinician to foresee the potential evolution of the deformity.

Can Craniosynostosis be Diagnosed on Physical Examination? A Retrospective Review

Craniosynostosis is a developmental craniofacial defect in which one or more sutures of the skull fuse together prematurely. Uncorrected craniosynostosis may have serious complications including elevated intracranial pressure, developmental delay, and blindness. Proper diagnosis of craniosynostosis requires a physical examination of the head with assessment for symmetry and palpation of sutures for prominence. Often, if craniosynostosis is suspected, computed tomography (CT) imaging will be obtained. Recent literature has posited that this is unnecessary. This study aims to address whether physical examination alone is sufficient for the diagnosis and treatment planning of single suture craniosynostosis. Between 2015 and 2022, the Divisions of Pediatric Neurosurgery and Pediatric Plastic Surgery at UTHealth Houston evaluated 140 children under 36 months of age with suspected craniosynostosis by physical examination and subsequently ordered CT imaging for preoperative planning. Twenty-three patients received a clinical diagnosis of multi-sutural or syndromic craniosynostosis that was confirmed by CT. One hundred seventeen patients were diagnosed with single suture craniosynostosis on clinical examination and follow-up CT confirmed suture fusion in 109 (93.2%) patients and identified intracranial anomalies in 7 (6.0%) patients. These patients underwent surgical correction. Eight (6.8%) patients showed no evidence of craniosynostosis on CT imaging. Treatment for patients without fused sutures included molding helmets and observation alone. This evidence suggests that physical examination alone may be inadequate to accurately diagnose single suture synostosis, and surgery without preoperative CT evaluation could lead to unindicated procedures.

Smartphone Integration of Artificial Intelligence for Automated Plagiocephaly Diagnosis

Positional plagiocephaly is a pediatric condition with important cosmetic implications affecting ∼40% of infants under 12 months of age. Early diagnosis and treatment initiation is imperative in achieving satisfactory outcomes; improved diagnostic modalities are needed to support this goal. This study aimed to determine whether a smartphone-based artificial intelligence tool could diagnose positional plagiocephaly.

Methods

A prospective validation study was conducted at a large tertiary care center with two recruitment sites: (1) newborn nursery, (2) pediatric craniofacial surgery clinic. Eligible children were aged 0-12 months with no history of hydrocephalus, intracranial tumors, intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial hardware, or prior craniofacial surgery. Successful artificial intelligence diagnosis required identification of the presence and severity of positional plagiocephaly.

Results

A total of 89 infants were prospectively enrolled from the craniofacial surgery clinic (n = 25, 17 male infants [68%], eight female infants [32%], mean age 8.44 months) and newborn nursery (n = 64, 29 male infants [45%], 25 female infants [39%], mean age 0 months). The model obtained a diagnostic accuracy of 85.39% compared with a standard clinical examination with a disease prevalence of 48%. Sensitivity was 87.50% [95% CI, 75.94-98.42] with a specificity of 83.67% [95% CI, 72.35-94.99]. Precision was 81.40%, while likelihood ratios (positive and negative) were 5.36 and 0.15, respectively. The F1-score was 84.34%.

Conclusions

The smartphone-based artificial intelligence algorithm accurately diagnosed positional plagiocephaly in a clinical environment. This technology may provide value by helping guide specialist consultation and enabling longitudinal quantitative monitoring of cranial shape.

Moderne Behandlung von Kraniosynostosen

Hintergrund

Bei 13–48 % aller Lebendgeborenen treten Auffälligkeiten der Schädelform auf. Meistens ist ein lagerungsbedingter Plagiozephalus ursächlich. Bei vorzeitigem Verschluss von Schädelnähten resultieren pathognomische Deformitäten durch das kompensatorische Wachstum der umgebenden Schädelknochen. Es muss zwischen Einzelnahtsynostosen und Kraniosynostosen im Rahmen syndromaler Erkrankungen unterschieden werden.

Ziel

Diese Arbeit soll einen Überblick über Diagnostik, konservative und chirurgische Therapie von Kraniosynostosen geben.

Methoden

Narratives Review.

Ergebnis

Bei Verdacht auf eine Kraniosynostose erfolgt zunächst die klinische Beurteilung und Einschätzung durch erfahrene Untersucher. Die pathognomische Schädelform ergibt die Arbeitsdiagnose. Bestätigt wird diese durch Verfahren wie 3D-Stereofotografie und Sonographie. In komplexen Fällen können CT oder MRT notwendig sein.

Die Indikation für eine Therapie ergibt sich aus ästhetischen Gesichtspunkten und der Vorbeugung psychosozialer Folgen. Bei syndromalen Formen besteht diese insbesondere zur Vermeidung möglicher Folgen eines erhöhten Hirndrucks.

Besteht die Indikation zur Operation muss zwischen endoskopischer und offener Technik unterschieden werden. Unterschiede bestehen hier hinsichtlich Invasivität und möglichem Korrekturausmaß. Im Anschluss an die operative Behandlung schließt sich häufig eine Helmtherapie an, um das bestmögliche Ergebnis zu erreichen. Die anschließende Follow-up-Periode erstreckt sich mindestens bis zum 12. Lebensjahr. Insgesamt sollte die Behandlung im Team mit Neurochirurgen, Mund‑, Kiefer‑, Gesichtschirurgen, Kinderärzten, Augenärzten und Humangenetikern stattfinden.

[Difficulties in differential diagnosis of sagittal synostosis (scaphocephaly)]

Craniosynostosis is characterized by congenital absence or premature closure of skull sutures. The most common form of craniosynostosis is synostosis of sagittal suture followed by scaphocephaly. There are some head deformities similar to scaphocephaly such as positional and constitutional dolichocephaly, etc. These patients have no sagittal suture synostosis. However, there are difficulties in differential diagnosis between these deformities and scaphocephaly.

OBJECTIVE

To develop differential diagnostic criteria between dolichocephalic head deformities and true scaphocephaly following sagittal synostosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 33 patients with dolichocephaly (25 (75.8%) boys and 8 (24.2%) girls) between December 2013 and August 2022. The inclusion criterion was available CT or ultrasound data confirming or excluding sagittal synostosis. Age of patients was 8.62±7.71 (1.77-36) months. We analyzed anamnestic, clinical and radiological data. Radiological data was compared with diagnostic findings in 20 patients with scaphocephaly. Both groups were comparable in age, gender and cranial index.

RESULTS

We present clinical and radiological signs, as well as algorithm for differential diagnosis between scaphocephaly and dolichocephaly.

CONCLUSION

There are objective difficulties in differential diagnosis between scaphocephaly following sagittal synostosis and dolichocephalic head deformities. In most cases, we cannot establish the cause of congenital forms of dolichocephaly. The most likely causes may be pre- and postnatal compressive and positional effects. Ultrasound of skull sutures is preferable for differential diagnosis between these abnormalities. Correction of dolichocephaly can be carried out according to aesthetic indications with individual cranial orthoses.

Automatic Segmentation of Bone Selective MR Images for Visualization and Craniometry of the Cranial Vault

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Solid-state MRI has been shown to provide a radiation-free alternative imaging strategy to CT. However, manual image segmentation to produce bone-selective MR-based 3D renderings is time and labor intensive, thereby acting as a bottleneck in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate an automatic multi-atlas segmentation pipeline for use on cranial vault images entirely circumventing prior manual intervention, and to assess concordance of craniometric measurements between pipeline produced MRI and CT-based 3D skull renderings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dual-RF, dual-echo, 3D UTE pulse sequence MR data were obtained at 3T on 30 healthy subjects along with low-dose CT images between December 2018 to January 2020 for this prospective study. The four-point MRI datasets (two RF pulse widths and two echo times) were combined to produce bone-specific images. CT images were thresholded and manually corrected to segment the cranial vault. CT images were then rigidly registered to MRI using mutual information. The corresponding cranial vault segmentations were then transformed to MRI. The "ground truth" segmentations served as reference for the MR images. Subsequently, an automated multi-atlas pipeline was used to segment the bone-selective images. To compare manually and automatically segmented MR images, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were computed, and craniometric measurements between CT and automated-pipeline MRI-based segmentations were examined via Lin's concordance coefficient (LCC).

RESULTS

Automated segmentation reduced the need for an expert to obtain segmentation. Average DSC was 90.86 ± 1.94%, and average 95th percentile HD was 1.65 ± 0.44 mm between ground truth and automated segmentations. MR-based measurements differed from CT-based measurements by 0.73-1.2 mm on key craniometric measurements. LCC for distances between CT and MR-based landmarks were vertex-basion: 0.906, left-right frontozygomatic suture: 0.780, and glabella-opisthocranium: 0.956 for the three measurements.

CONCLUSION

Good agreement between CT and automated MR-based 3D cranial vault renderings has been achieved, thereby eliminating the laborious manual segmentation process. Target applications comprise craniofacial surgery as well as imaging of traumatic injuries and masses involving both bone and soft tissue.

Delayed Presentation of Unicoronal Craniosynostosis-Masked by Ipsilateral Posterior Deformational Plagiocephaly

Despite a greater awareness of the differential diagnosis of head shape abnormalities among pediatricians, the effect of deformational forces on calvarial morphology can complicate the diagnosis of craniosynostosis. In this report, we describe 2 patients diagnosed with unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) in a delayed fashion due to the presence of concomitant posterior deformational plagiocephaly (PDP). In both cases, the severity of each patients' PDP obscured changes typically associated with UCS. This unique presentation underscores the importance of having a high index of suspicion for possible premature suture fusion despite the presence of concomitant PDP.

An Open Cranial Vault Remodeling Procedure for Craniosynostosis: A Retrospective Study

Craniosynostosis is a skull malformation occurring due to the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures. This pathological entity is a relatively commonly observed congenital malformation and is reportedly seen in 1/1,700–1,900 live births. The study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of the open cranial vault remodeling (OCVR) in children with craniosynostosis.

Medical records of 76 children with craniosynostosis who were diagnosed at the neurosurgery departments of our centers for 11 years (from January 2010 to December 2020) were retrospectively examined. Among them, 54 consecutive children who underwent OCVR were included in this study. Surgical outcomes were discussed with a related literature review.

Fifty-four (32 males and 22 females) consecutive children received OCVR for craniosynostosis with a mean age of 12.6 ± 7.1 months. Eight children were syndromic. Three children were shunt-induced craniosynostosis. Syndromic children were four with Apert, two with Pfeiffer, and two with Crouzon syndrome. Twelve children were brothers/sisters. The misshapen skull was the most commonly recorded symptom in 49 children (90.7%). The most affected sutures were bicoronal craniosynostosis found in 20 children. The complication rate was 9.3% (n = 5). Two of these five children needed reoperation for optimal remodeling. One child died postoperatively in the intensive care unit due to cardiac arrest.

These findings demonstrated that the OCVR approach is an efficient surgical method to get good outcomes. Satisfactory results with an acceptable complication rate can be obtained with expert hands. Further studies are warranted to support these findings.

[Cranial suture ultrasound for reducing radiation exposure in diagnosis of craniosynostosis in young children]

Currently, there are no standards for examining patients with suspected craniosynostosis. CT of the brain with 3D skull reconstruction is a common approach to diagnose craniosynostosis in many hospitals. This technique in pediatric patients is associated with a high dose of ionizing radiation and prompts searching for other diagnostic methods.

OBJECTIVE

To generalize an experience of cranial suture ultrasound and compare diagnostic capabilities of various ultrasound devices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of cranial suture ultrasound in 49 patients under the age of 14 months with a suspected craniosynostosis. All patients underwent expert-class ultrasound. Of these, 10 patients underwent middle-class ultrasound. Age of these patients ranged from 2 to 10 months.

RESULTS

According to ultrasound data, we have found 48 synostotic sutures in 42 patients. There were 2 inaccurate results among these 48 sutures. In both cases, expert-class ultrasound confirmed partial closure of cranial sutures while 3D CT revealed their complete closure. Sensitivity and specificity of technique were 95.8% and 100%, respectively. Both expert- and middle-class ultrasound revealed synostotic sutures in 10 children under 1 year old.

CONCLUSION

Our data have shown that ultrasound of cranial sutures may be a first-line imaging technique. This method has high sensitivity and specificity in pediatric patients. Moreover, middle-class ultrasound devices may be used for diagnosis.

Postnatal diagnosis of single-suture craniosynostosis with cranial ultrasound: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The optimal protocol for diagnostic workup of craniosynostosis and the role of specific imaging modalities remain controversial. Skull X-rays and 3-dimensional head CTs are options when physical exam is equivocal but involve ionizing radiation. Ultrasound has emerged as an alternative modality for visualization of cranial sutures, but its use is not widespread.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review of the literature on the use of ultrasound for the diagnosis of craniosynostosis.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies involving 1062 patients were included. Overall, 300 patients (28.2%) were diagnosed with craniosynostosis. A total of 369 (34.7%) patients had their diagnosis (craniosynostosis vs. patent sutures) confirmed with another imaging modality in addition to ultrasound. Among studies, the specificity of ultrasound ranged from 86 to 100%, and the sensitivity from 71 to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasonography of cranial sutures is a feasible and accurate tool for the diagnosis of single-suture craniosynostosis when physical exam findings are insufficient. Although technical aspects of ultrasonography and its interpretation have an associated learning curve, ultrasound can achieve high sensitivity and specificity among patients with suspected craniosynostosis.

Sutures ultrasound: useful diagnostic screening for posterior plagiocephaly

PURPOSE

Posterior plagiocephaly (PP) is a common clinical condition in pediatric age. There are two main causes of PP: postural plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis. Early diagnosis is important, as it prevents neurological complications and emergencies. Diagnosis in the past was often made late and with imaging tests that subjected the infant to a high radiation load. Suture ultrasound does not use ionizing radiation; it is easy to perform, allows an early diagnosis, and directs toward the execution of the cranial 3D-CT scan, neurosurgical consultation, and possible intervention. The aim of the study is to describe the high sensitivity and specificity of suture ultrasound for the differential diagnosis between plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis.

METHODS

We reported our prospective experience and compared it with the data in the literature through a systematic review. The systematic review was conducted on electronic medical databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) evaluating the published literature up to November 2020. According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-ANALYSES (PRISMA statement), we identified 2 eligible studies. Additionally, according to AMSTAR 2, all included reviews have been critically rated as high quality. A total of 120 infants with abnormal skull shape were examined in NICU. All underwent clinical and ultrasound examination.

RESULTS

Of the total, 105 (87.5%) had plagiocephaly and 15 dolichocephaly/scaphocephaly (12.5%). None of these had associated other types of malformations and/or neurological disorders. The synostotic suture was identified ultrasonographically in 1 infant and subsequently confirmed by 3D CT scan (100%).

CONCLUSION

Cranial sutures ultrasonography can be considered in infants a selective, excellent screening method for the evaluation of skull shape deformities as first technique before the 3D CT scan exam and subsequent neurosurgical evaluation. Cranial suture ultrasonography should be considered part of clinical practice especially for pediatricians.

Computed Tomography in Patients With Craniosynostosis: A Survey to Ascertain Practice Patterns Among Craniofacial Surgeons

BACKGROUND

In patients with craniosynostosis, imaging remains up to the discretion of the plastic surgeon or neurosurgeon. To inform best practice guidelines, we sought to obtain data surrounding the frequency at which craniofacial surgeons order computed tomography (CT), as well as indications. We hypothesized that we would identify considerable variation in both imaging and associated indications.

METHODS

We surveyed members of the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons and the American Society of Craniofacial Surgeons to measure the frequency of preoperative and postoperative head CTs, as well as indications. Initial items were piloted with 2 craniofacial surgeons and 1 neurosurgeon, using interviews to ensure content validity. χ2 Tests were used to measure associations between operative volume, years in practice, and imaging.

RESULTS

Eighty-five craniofacial surgeons responded (13.8% response rate), with the majority (63.5%) having performed a craniosynostosis operation in the last month. Only 9.4% of surgeons never order preoperative CTs. Of those who do, the most common indications included diagnosis confirmation (31.2%) and preoperative planning (27.3%). About 25% of surgeons always obtain postoperative head CTs, usually to evaluate surgical outcomes (46.7%). Only 13.3% of respondents order 2 or more postoperative scans. Higher operative volume was associated with a lower likelihood of ordering preoperative head CTs (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of surgeons obtain preoperative head CTs, whereas only 25% obtain CTs postoperatively, often to evaluate outcomes. Because outcomes may be evaluated clinically, this is a poor use of resources and exposes children to radiation. Consensus guidelines are needed to create best practices and limit unnecessary studies.

Preoperative imaging patterns and intracranial findings in single-suture craniosynostosis: a study from the Synostosis Research Group

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of single-suture craniosynostosis can be made by physical examination, but the use of confirmatory imaging is common practice. The authors sought to investigate preoperative imaging use and to describe intracranial findings in children with single-suture synostosis from a large, prospective multicenter cohort.

METHODS

In this study from the Synostosis Research Group, the study population included children with clinically diagnosed single-suture synostosis between March 1, 2017, and October 31, 2020, at 5 institutions. The primary analysis correlated the clinical diagnosis and imaging diagnosis; secondary outcomes included intracranial findings by pathological suture type.

RESULTS

A total of 403 children (67% male) were identified with single-suture synostosis. Sagittal (n = 267), metopic (n = 77), coronal (n = 52), and lambdoid (n = 7) synostoses were reported; the most common presentation was abnormal head shape (97%), followed by a palpable or visible ridge (37%). Preoperative cranial imaging was performed in 90% of children; findings on 97% of these imaging studies matched the initial clinical diagnosis. Thirty-one additional fused sutures were identified in 18 children (5%) that differed from the clinical diagnosis. The most commonly used imaging modality by far was CT (n = 360), followed by radiography (n = 9) and MRI (n = 7). Most preoperative imaging was ordered as part of a protocolized pathway (67%); some images were obtained as a result of a nondiagnostic clinical examination (5.2%). Of the 360 patients who had CT imaging, 150 underwent total cranial vault surgery and 210 underwent strip craniectomy. The imaging findings influenced the surgical treatment 0.95% of the time. Among the 24% of children with additional (nonsynostosis) abnormal findings on CT, only 3.5% required further monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that a clinical diagnosis of single-suture craniosynostosis and the findings on CT were the same with rare exceptions. CT imaging very rarely altered the surgical treatment of children with single-suture synostosis.

Diagnosis and Management of Suture-Related Concerns of the Infant Skull

The cranial fontanelles and sutures have several benign variations, including most cases of "early" or "late" closure of the anterior fontanelle, bathrocephaly, overriding sutures, and benign metopic ridging. However, recognizing true craniosynostosis and referring the patient to a craniofacial specialist in a timely fashion are imperative, as minimally invasive options can be offered to most patients younger than 6 months of age. Gaining comfort with the physical examination of an infant with an abnormal head shape is best achieved through experience and pattern recognition and will frequently facilitate an accurate diagnosis without the need for ionizing radiation.

Minimally invasive endoscopically assisted remodelation (MEAR) of sagittal craniosynostosis: an alternative technique to open and endoscopic procedures with cranial orthosis time span reduction

INTRODUCTION

Sagittal craniosynostosis represents the most frequent simplex skull suture pathology. There are currently several operative approaches to this defect. Minimally invasive techniques are preferred for young infants. Since July 2017, we have employed endoscopically assisted craniectomies followed by cranial orthosis. Gradually, we have developed our modified technique, the minimally invasive endoscopically assisted remodelation (MEAR).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

MEAR is a combination of principles gained from classical cranial vault remodeling techniques and minimal invasive approaches. The long and wider lateral osteoectomies performed in the parietal and occipital bones along with loosening of the periosteum and dura adhesions at the lambdoid sutures lead to early correction of parieto-occipital dimensions.

RESULTS

Thirty-one consecutive patients with scaphocephaly underwent MEAR. The median preoperative cephalic index of 67 units (P25:63.3, P75:70) was improved to a median postoperative cephalic index of 77 units (P25:75, P75: 81). Sufficient correction was achieved in all patients. Cranial orthosis was needed for a median of 1.5 months (P25:1, P75:2). We had no major surgical complications in this pilot series.

CONCLUSIONS

With MEAR, we have achieved good cosmetic results. Duration of cranial orthosis was significantly shortened compared to conventional endoscopic-assisted procedures.

Imaging in craniosynostosis: when and what?

PURPOSE

Currently, the interest on craniosynostosis in the clinical practice is raised by their increased frequency and their genetic implications other than by the still existing search of less invasive surgical techniques. These reasons, together with the problem of legal issues, make the need of a definite diagnosis for a crucial problem, even in single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC). Although the diagnosis of craniosynostosis is primarily the result of physical examination, craniometrics measuring, and observation of the skull deformity, the radiological assessment currently plays an important role in the confirmation of the diagnosis, the surgical planning, and even the postoperative follow-up. On the other hand, in infants, the use of radiation or the need of sedation/anesthesia raises the problem to reduce them to minimum to preserve such a delicate category of patient from their adverse effects.

METHODS, RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This review aims at summarizing the state of the art of the role of radiology in craniosynostosis, mainly focusing on indications and techniques, to provide an update not only to pediatric neurosurgeons or maxillofacial surgeons but also to all the other specialists involved in their management, like neonatologists, pediatricians, clinical geneticists, and pediatric neurologists.

Cranial Suture Measurement by 2-point Method in Ultrasound Screening of Craniosynostosis

Background:

Diagnostic imaging for craniosynostosis currently relies entirely on radiation images, but it has been estimated that a risk of cancer from diagnostic x-rays may exist. Use of ultrasound imaging has been reported, but very little has been written on normal findings of the cranial suture. Also, ultrasound diagnostic methods have not been established. To obtain images for the diagnosis of abnormal sutures in craniosynostosis, we investigated the normal ultrasonographic appearance of the suture. To establish screening methods for craniosynostosis, we prepared a 2-point method for simple evaluation and confirmed its usefulness.

Methods:

Ultrasonography was performed in infants with normal head, deformational plagiocephaly, and craniosynostosis. We focused on the measurement indices and decided on the order for making our observations. Furthermore, we developed an evaluation method (2-point method) and recorded our finding in a useful table.

Results:

We could clearly judge whether the cranial suture was patent or closed and were able to measure the suture width. Even for 2-year-old children, the width of the sutures at the points measured exceeded the echocardiographic resolution. By using the 2-point evaluation method, all the sutures could be inspected in about 2 minutes. Sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 95.1%.

Conclusions:

Our present studies showed that normal or abnormal suture can be clearly distinguished by ultrasound. By evaluating the fixed points instead of the whole line, it was possible to shorten the inspection time. Ultrasound screening by applying the 2-point method is very useful.

Centile charts for cranial sutures in children younger than 1 year based on ultrasound measurements

BACKGROUND

Cranial US allows for the evaluation of premature closure (synostosis) or abnormal widening of the cranial sutures. An understanding of the normal anatomy is required to help define the presence or absence of abnormality.

OBJECTIVE

To provide reference for normal ultrasound measurements of cranial sutures during the child's first year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included children ages 0 to 12 months who were referred to the hospital during 2011-2013 for radiographic evaluation of cranial sutures. Cranial US study was focused on evaluating the sagittal, coronal, lambdoid and metopic sutures. We measured the hypoechoic gap between the bones (patent suture). Two readers performed the measurements, blinded to clinical indications and previous reports. Estimates of the 10^th, 25^th, 50^th, 75^th and 90^th percentiles were achieved for ages 1-12 months.

RESULTS

Of 129 children whose families consented to cranial US, 11 were excluded because of craniosynostosis and 3 for suboptimal quality of cranial US images. In 115 patients measurements of normal cranial sutures were obtained (75 boys [65%], ages 0.26-11.27 months). For each suture, the suture size decreased significantly with age (P<0.001). Only the metopic suture was noted to close completely toward the end of the first year of age. There were no statistically significant differences in age-related suture size by gender.

CONCLUSION

The current patient series represents a reference of percentiles of normal ultrasound measurements of cranial sutures during the first year of age.

The State of Technology in Craniosynostosis

INTRODUCTION

Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of ≥1 cranial sutures, is the leading cause of pediatric skull deformities, affecting 1 of every 2000 to 2500 live births worldwide. Technologies used for the management of craniofacial conditions, specifically in craniosynostosis, have been advancing dramatically. This article highlights the most recent technological advances in craniosynostosis surgery through a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search was performed using the PubMed database. Search terms used were "craniosynostosis" AND "technology" OR "innovation" OR "novel.' Two independent reviewers subsequently reviewed the resultant articles based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Selected manuscripts deemed novel by the senior authors were grouped by procedure categories.

RESULTS

Following review of the PubMed database, 28 of 536 articles were retained. Of the 28 articles, 20 articles consisting of 21 technologies were deemed as being novel by the senior authors. The technologies were categorized as diagnostic imaging (n = 6), surgical planning (n = 4), cranial vault evaluation (n = 4), machine learning (n = 3), ultrasound pinning (n = 3), and near-infrared spectroscopy (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Multiple technological advances have impacted the treatment of craniosynostosis. These innovations include improvement in diagnosis and objective measurement of craniosynostosis, preoperative planning, intraoperative procedures, communication between both surgeons and patients, and surgical education.