Elbow flexion in neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a meta-analysis of graft versus transfer

Surgical Treatment of Obstetric Plexus Lesions by Direct Coaptation Compared to Sural Nerve Graft Interposition

Background  To date, there are no uniform guidelines for the treatment of obstetric plexus lesions in German-speaking countries. An end-to-end direct suture after resection of trunk neuroma is recommended for surgical treatment if tension-free coaptation is possible, whereas the use of autologous nerve grafts bridging the gap between the adaptation margins is advised by consensus if tension-free coaptation is impossible. Objective  The aim of the study was to investigate which reconstruction strategy may provide a better recovery of motor function for patients after obstetric brachial plexus lesion. Methods  This study compared postoperative functional outcome after obstetric brachial plexus palsy from a patient collective including a total of 43 children. The surgical techniques of plexus reconstruction by end-to-end coaptation versus the use of sural nerve interposition graft have been analyzed. Therefore, the degrees of active motion of abduction and external rotation in the shoulder joint, and flexion in the elbow joint were assessed using the neutral zero method. Results  For abduction in the shoulder joint, significantly better motor function was found in the group with direct sutures ( p  = 0.033). For external rotation in the shoulder joint and flexion in the elbow joint, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups ( p  = 0.284 and p  = 0.270, respectively). Conclusions  This study could not demonstrate absolute superiority of either reconstruction method. Slight evidence was found for a better functional outcome for plexus reconstruction by direct coaptation. Further arguments support a better suitability of plexus reconstruction by direct suture if its use is justifiable.

Prospective study comparing outcomes of primary intraplexal repair versus distal nerve transfers in Narakas grade I birth brachial plexus palsy

To compare the results of intraplexal repair and distal nerve transfer in babies with birth brachial plexus palsy (BBPP), children with Narakas group I obstetric palsy were assigned to two groups of 16 each. Children in group A were treated with classical intraplexal repair and those in group B were treated by distal nerve transfers. At 6 months, all the children in group B had achieved Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) grade 3 elbow flexion along with 8 of the 16 children in group A, which was a statistically significant difference. At 6 months, all the children in group B achieved MMRC grade 3 or higher shoulder abduction and 8 of the 16 children in group A had done so, which was also statistically significant. At the final follow-up, the distal transfer surgical treatment group had a significantly higher Mallet score. Distal nerve transfers have a significant advantage in early recovery in elbow flexion and shoulder abduction, but the outcomes became similar after 9 months.Level of evidence: III.

Recovery of Shoulder, Elbow, and Forearm Movement After Nerve Reconstruction for Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is a relative dearth of published data with respect to recovery of upper extremity movement after nerve reconstruction for neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP). This study aimed to demonstrate long-term recovery of active range of motion (AROM) at the shoulder, elbow, and forearm after nerve reconstruction for NBPP and to compare that with patients managed nonoperatively.

METHODS

We interrogated a prospectively collected database of all patients evaluated for NBPP at a single institution from 2005 to 2020. AROM measurements for shoulder, elbow, and forearm movements were collected at every visit up to 5 years of follow-up and normalized between 0 and 1. We used generalized estimated equations to predict AROM for each movement within local age windows over 5 years and compared the operative and nonoperative cohorts at each age interval.

RESULTS

In total, >13 000 collected datapoints representing 425 conservatively and 99 operatively managed children were included for analysis. At 5 years, absolute recovery of AROM after nerve reconstruction was ∼50% for shoulder abduction and forward flexion, ∼65% for shoulder external rotation, and ∼75% for elbow flexion and forearm supination, with ∼20% loss of elbow extension AROM. Despite more limited AROM on presentation for the operative cohort, at 5 years, there was no significant difference between the groups in AROM for shoulder external rotation, elbow extension, or forearm supination, and, in Narakas grade 1-2 injury, shoulder abduction and forward flexion.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate recovery of upper extremity AROM after nerve surgery for NBPP. Despite more severe presenting injury, operative patients had similar recovery of AROM when compared with nonoperative patients for shoulder external rotation, elbow extension, forearm supination, and, for Narakas grade 1-2 injury, shoulder abduction and forward flexion.

Recent Advances in the Treatment of Brachial Plexus Birth Injury

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe methods of clinical evaluation for neurologic recovery in brachial plexus birth injury. 2. Understand the role of different diagnostic imaging modalities to evaluate the upper limb. 3. List nonsurgical strategies and surgical procedures to manage shoulder abnormality. 4. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of microsurgical nerve reconstruction and distal nerve transfers in brachial plexus birth injury. 5. Recognize the prevalence of pain in this population and the need for greater sensory outcomes evaluation.

SUMMARY

Brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) results from closed traction injury to the brachial plexus in the neck during an infant's vertex passage through the birth canal. Although spontaneous upper limb recovery occurs in most instances of BPBI, some infants do not demonstrate adequate motor recovery within an acceptable timeline and require surgical intervention to restore upper limb function. This article reviews major advances in the management of BPBI in the past decade that include improved understanding of shoulder pathology and its impact on observed motor recovery, novel surgical techniques, new insights in sensory function and pain, and global efforts to develop standardized outcomes assessment scales.

Differences in the surgical treatment of adult and pediatric brachial plexus injuries among peripheral nerve surgeons

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral nerve surgeons disagree on the optimal timing and treatment of brachial plexus injuries (BPI). This study aims to survey peripheral nerve surgeons on their management of BPI, including disagreement.

METHODS

Surgeons responded to a case-based survey involving traumatic and birth injuries leading to BPI involving the upper and lower trunks, and pre- and post-ganglionic injuries.

RESULTS

Out of 255 invited surgeons, 154 participated, with specialties of Neurosurgery (33.7%), Plastic surgery (32.5%), and Orthopedics (32.5%). For the adult C5-6 avulsion injury, 97.4% agreed they would operate. There was 46.2% disagreement regarding the pediatric upper trunk neuroma-in-continuity case, and similar disagreement (50.0%) was recorded on exploring the brachial plexus for a pediatric lower trunk injury case. High percentages of surgeons were more likely to explore the plexus, such as at upper BPI. Also, most participants reported nerve transfer for the upper and lower trunk avulsion injuries, but there was 55.6% disagreement regarding nerve transfer for the infant with the upper trunk neuroma-in-continuity. Among those elected to perform nerve transfer, most (70.0%-84.5%) would perform an accessory-to-suprascapular nerve transfer for upper BPI, while brachialis-to-anterior interosseous and supinator branch of the radial nerve-to-posterior interosseous were preferred for lower BPI (30.0%-55.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial disagreement exists among peripheral nerve surgeons in managing adult and pediatric BPI. In adult BPI, most prefer to operate at the time of the presentation and perform extensive nerve transfers. The accessory-suprascapular transfer was recommended for upper BPI, while brachialis and radial nerves were preferred for lower BPI. The most significant disagreements exist in operation and nerve transfer for pediatric upper BPI and brachial plexus explorations. Geography, specialty, and operative volume contribute to the differences seen.

Upper extremity nerve transfers for acute flaccid myelitis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a rare disease that commonly affects young children. AFM's pathophysiology involves loss of lower motor neurons following a viral infection and induces acute asymmetric flaccid paralysis most commonly in the upper extremities. Nerve transfers have emerged as a treatment option for these patients with permanent motor deficits.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the literature and report safety and efficacy outcomes following nerve transfers for recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation, and elbow flexion and extension in pediatric patients with AFM. Recovery of at least antigravity function was defined as a successful outcome. This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were utilized.

RESULTS

Five studies comprising 44 patients (median age 2.95 years; 71% male), and 93 upper extremity nerve transfers were included. Thirty-eight patients received 65 nerve transfer procedures aiming for recovery of shoulder abduction and/or external rotation with a transfer to the axillary and/or suprascapular nerve. The recovery of shoulder abduction and external rotation was achieved in 40.7% (n = 11/27) and 60% (n = 6/10) of patients, respectively. Time from injury to surgery showed an inverse relationship with the odds for successful recovery (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.64-1.02; p = 0.07); however, statistical significance was not reached. Successful recovery of elbow flexion with a transfer to the musculocutaneous was reported at a rate of 92.3% (n = 12/13). Successful re-innervation of the radial nerve with recovery of elbow extension was found in 75% (n = 6/8) of patients. No complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper extremity nerve transfers appear to be promising and safe for AFM patients. Shoulder abduction is the most challenging upper extremity function to recover. Further studies are warranted to identify whether nerve transfers are associated with superior outcomes when performed earlier.

Nerve Graft and Nerve Transfer for Improving Elbow Flexion in Children with Obstetric Palsy. A Systematic Review

Obstetric brachial plexus palsy is a rather common injury in newborns, caused by traction to the brachial plexus during labor. In this context, with the present systematic review, we aimed to explore the use of nerve graft and nerve transfer as procedures to improve elbow flexion in children with obstetric palsy. For the present review, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Wholis and SCOPUS databases. Predetermined criteria defined the following requirements for inclusion of a study: Clinical trials, quasi-experiments, and cohort studies that performed nerve graft and nerve transfer in children (≤ 3 years old) with diagnosis of obstetric palsy. The risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions assessment tool was used for nonrandomized studies. Out of seven studies that used both procedures, three of them compared the procedures of nerve graft with nerve transfer, and the other four combined them as a reconstructive method for children with obstetric palsy. According to the Medical Research Council grading system, both methods improved equally elbow flexion in the children. Overall, our results showed that both techniques of nerve graft and nerve transfer are equally good options for nerve reconstruction in cases of obstetric palsy. More studies approaching nerve reconstruction techniques in obstetric palsy should be made, preferably randomized clinical trials, to validate the results of the present systematic review.