Atonic seizures in children: a meta-analysis comparing corpus callosotomy to vagus nerve stimulation

A Standardized Approach to MRI-Guided Stereotactic Laser Corpus Callosotomy: Technical Description and Pediatric Case Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Corpus callosotomy is an effective procedure approach for treating medication-resistant drop seizures, which pose a significant challenge in patients with epilepsy. Laser interstitial thermal therapy offers an alternative to open surgery for performing corpus callosotomy that may limit approach-related comorbidities. Practices vary regarding the number of laser filaments used and staging; outcome data for pediatric patients remain relatively limited.

METHODS

We illustrate a set of 4 standardized trajectories for performing MRI-guided stereotactic laser corpus callosotomy (SLCC). For this retrospective cohort study in a pediatric neurosurgery practice, the medical records and imaging were reviewed for 10 consecutive patients who had medication-refractory drop seizures and underwent SLCC. Data collected and analyzed included patient and epilepsy characteristics, procedural details, surgical approaches, and clinical follow-up results.

RESULTS

Over 2 years, complete, single-stage SLCC was performed in 8 patients, and posterior completion SLCC was performed in 2 patients who had previously had open anterior corpus callosotomy. Four laser fibers were used in four-eighth complete SLCC, and 3 fibers were used in four-eighth complete SLCC. Seven of 10 patients were discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 1, with only 1 requiring a maximum stay of 6 days. Five of 9 evaluable patients reported no drop seizures at the last clinical follow-up. In the other 4 patients, 1 experienced them only rarely, another experienced less than 25% preoperative frequency, and the remaining 2 had less than a 50% improvement. In addition, improvement in other seizure types exceeded 50% in 8 of 9 patients. Notably, no perioperative or postoperative complications were observed, nor were there any sustained neurological deficits reported.

CONCLUSION

Complete SLCC can be safely and effectively performed in pediatric patients. It is comparable in effectiveness with open surgery but has lower complication rates and shorter hospitalization.

Applications of magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy in disconnective epilepsy surgery

Minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), have emerged as promising alternatives to open disconnective surgeries in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This review synthesizes current literature on the application of LITT for corpus callosal disconnection and functional hemispheric disconnection. Studies highlight LITT's effectiveness for achieving seizure control and functional outcomes, often with reduced complications compared to traditional open procedures. Challenges include technical limitations to achieving total disconnection and adequate assessment of disconnection postoperatively. The literature is largely composed of observational studies and there is a need for rigorous, multi-center trials to establish robust guidelines and improve generalizability in clinical practice. There is also a need for a more robust exploration of how patient-specific factors contribute to response or nonresponse to intervention.

A retrospective study on post-operative recovery of daily living activity after total corpus callosotomy

INTRODUCTION

Post-operative complications of corpus callosotomy (CC) in children, prolonged hospitalization due to inactivity as acute disconnection syndrome is occasionally experienced. We aimed to clarify this issue and its risk factors with a hypothesis that electroencephalogram (EEG) findings as measures of functional lateralization may be among prognostic factors for post-operative recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with childhood-onset drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent total CC between April 2017 and December 2023 were included in the study and they were divided into two groups based on the duration of post-operative hospitalization as an indicator of recovery of daily living activity. We compared scalp EEG findings and the other factors including clinical characteristics between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of 22 patients (14 males) without specific complications, post-operative hospitalization clustered in 9-14 days in 15 patients (Group A) with range 16-118 days in seven patients (Group B). The ratios of patients with non-lateralized spikes on pre-operative EEG and that of patients with symmetric background activity on post-operative EEG were significantly greater in Group B (7/7, 100 %; 6/7, 86 %, respectively) than in Group A (8/15, 53 %; 4/15, 27 %, respectively) (p = 0.038; p = 0.020, respectively, by Fisher's exact test), while other factors were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed recovery of living activity should be anticipated, especially in patients with non-lateralized epileptic discharges on pre-operative EEG.

A survey of preferences and expectations for surgical interventions targeting atonic seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

PURPOSE

To assess preferences and outcome expectations for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and corpus callosotomy (CC) surgeries in the treatment of atonic seizure in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).

METHODS

A total of 260 surveys were collected from patients are caregivers of LGS patients via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).

RESULTS

Respondents reported an average acceptable atonic seizure reduction rate of 55.9% following VNS and 74.7% following CC. 21.3% (n = 50) were willing to be randomized. Respondents reported low willingness for randomization and a higher seizure reduction expectation with CC.

CONCLUSION

Our findings guide surgical approaches for clinicians to consider patient preference in order to design future studies comparing effectiveness between these two procedures.

Norwegian population-based study of effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) compared with epilepsy patients without intellectual disability (ID).

METHODS

Long-term outcomes from a Norwegian VNS quality registry are reported in 105 patients with DEEs (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome [LGS] n = 62; Dravet n = 16; Rett n = 9; other syndromes n = 18) were compared with 212 epilepsy patients without ID, with median follow-up of 88 and 72 months, respectively. Total seizure reduction was evaluated at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months. Effect on different seizure types was evaluated at baseline and last observation carried forward (LOCF).

RESULTS

Median monthly seizure frequency at LOCF was reduced by 42.2% (p < 0.001) in patients with DEE and by 55.8% (p < 0.001) in patients without ID. In DEE patients, ≥50% seizure reduction at 6 and 24 months were 17.1% and 37.1%, respectively, and 33.5% and 48.6% for patients without ID. Seizure reduction ≥75% at 60 months occurred in 14.3% of DEE patients and 23.1% of patients without ID. Highest median reduction was for atonic seizures, most notably 64.6% for LGS patients. A better effect was seen at 2 years among DEE patients with unchanged medication compared with those with changed medication (54.5% vs. 35.6% responders, p = 0.078). More DEE patients were reported to have greater improvement in ictal or postictal severity (43.8% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.006) and alertness (62.9% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001) than patients without ID. For both groups, use of the magnet reduced seizure severity. Hoarseness was the most common adverse effect in both groups. In addition, DEE patients were frequently reported to have sleep disturbance, general discomfort, or abdominal problems.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data indicate that VNS is very effective for atonic seizures. Patients without ID had best overall seizure reduction, however, patients with DEE had higher retention rates probably due to other positive effects.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

DEE refers to a group of patients with severe epilepsy and intellectual disability. Many of these patients have restricted lifestyles with frequent seizures. VNS is a treatment option for patients who do not respond well to medicines, either because of insufficient effect or serious adverse effects. Our study shows that VNS is well tolerated in this patient group and leads to a reduction in all seizure types, most notably for seizures leading to fall. Many patients experience other positive effects like shorter and milder seizures, as well as improvement in alertness.

The changing landscape of palliative epilepsy surgery for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy that typically leads to decreased quality of life and deleterious neurodevelopmental comorbidities from medically refractory seizures. In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the development and availability of novel treatment strategies for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome patient to improve seizure. Recent advances in neuromodulation and minimally invasive magnetic resonance guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) have paved the way for new treatments strategies including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and MRgLITT corpus callosum ablation. These new strategies offer hope for children with drug-resistant generalized epilepsies, but important questions remain about the safety and effectiveness of these new approaches. In this review, we describe the opportunities presented by these new strategies and how each treatment strategy is currently being employed. Next, we will critically assess available evidence for these new approaches compared to traditional palliative epilepsy surgery approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and open microsurgical corpus callosotomy (CC). Finally, we will describe future directions that would help define which of the available strategies should be employed and when.

Current state of hemispherectomy and callosotomy for pediatric refractory epilepsy in Denmark

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes from hemispherectomy and callosotomy related to the need for anti-seizure medication (ASM), seizure frequency, and cognition.

METHODS

A review of the medical charts of all Danish pediatric patients who underwent hemispherectomy or callosotomy from January 1996 to December 2019 for preoperative and postoperative ASM use, seizure frequency, and cognitive data.

RESULTS

The median age of epilepsy onset was two years (interquartile range (IQR): 0.0-5.3) for the hemispherectomy patients (n = 16) and one year (IQR: 0.6-1.7) for callosotomy patients (n = 5). Median time from onset to final surgery was 3.4 years for hemispherectomy and 10.2 years for callosotomy, while the median follow-up time was 6.9 years and 9.0 years, respectively. Preoperatively, all patients had daily seizures and were treated with ≥ 2 ASM. Hemispherectomy resulted in a reduction in seizure frequency in 87.5 % of patients, with 78.6 % achieving seizure freedom. Furthermore, 81.3 % experienced a reduction in ASM use and 56.3 % stopped all ASM. Median IQ/developmental quotient (IQ/DQ) was low preoperatively (44.0 [IQR: 40.0-55.0]) and remained unchanged postoperatively (IQ change: 0.0 [IQR: -10.0-+4.0]). Callosotomy resulted in a seizure reduction of 86-99 % in four patients, and ASM could be reduced in three patients. Median IQ/DQ was 20.0 preoperatively (IQR: 20.0-30.0) and remained unchanged postoperatively (IQ change: 0.0 [IQR: 0.0]).

CONCLUSION

Hemispherectomy and callosotomy result in a substantial reduction in seizure frequency and ASM use without deterioration of IQ. Extensive epilepsy surgery should be considered early in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Corpus Callosotomy Is a Safe and Effective Procedure for Medically Resistant Epilepsy

Corpus callosotomy (CC) is an effective surgical treatment for medically resistant generalized or multifocal epilepsy (MRE). The premise of CC extrapolates from the observation that the corpus callosum is the predominant commissural pathway that allows spread and synchroneity of epileptogenic activity between the hemispheres. Candidacy for CC is typically reserved for patients seeking palliative epilepsy treatment with the goal of reducing the frequency of drop attacks, although reduction of other seizure semiologies (absence, complex partial seizures, and tonic-clonic) has been observed. A reduction in morbidity affiliated with evolution of surgical techniques to perform CC has improved the safety profile of the procedure without necessarily sacrificing efficacy.

Case report: Alexander's disease with "head drop" as the main symptom and literature review

Alexander's disease (AxD) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary disorder that is caused by the mutations in the GFAP gene, which encodes the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). This neurogenerative disease has many clinical manifestations, and the onset of disease spans a wide range of ages, from newborns to children, adults, and even the elderly. An overaccumulation of the expression of GFAP has a close causal relationship with the pathogenesis of Alexander's disease. Usually, the disease has severe morbidity and high mortality, and can be divided into three distinct subgroups that are based on the age of clinical presentation: infantile (0-2 years), juvenile (2-13 years), and adult (>13 years). Children often present with epilepsy, macrocephaly, and psychomotor retardation, while adolescents and adults mainly present with muscle weakness, spasticity, and bulbar symptoms. Atonic seizures are a type of epilepsy that often appears in the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and myoclonic-astatic epilepsy in early childhood; however, the prognosis is often poor. Atonic episodes are characterized by a sudden or frequent reduction in muscle tone that can be local (such as head, neck, or limb) or generalized. Here, we report a 4-year-old girl whose main symptoms were intermittent head drop movements, which could break the frontal frame and even bleed in severe conditions. A video-encephalography (VEEG) showed that the nodding movements were atonic seizures. A head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed abnormal signals in the bilateral paraventricular and bilateral subfrontal cortex. The gene detection analyses indicated that the GFAP gene exon 1 c.262 C>T was caused by a heterozygous mutation, as both her parents were of the wild-type. The girl had no other abnormal manifestations except atonic seizures. She could communicate normally and go to kindergarten. After an oral administration of sodium valproate, there were no atonic attacks. Although epilepsy is a common symptom of Alexander's disease, atonic seizures have not been reported to date. Therefore, we report a case of Alexander's disease with atonic seizures as the main symptom and provide a review of the literature.

Surgical Treatment of Drug-Resistant Generalized Epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize current evidence and recent developments in the surgical treatment of drug-resistant generalized epilepsy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current surgical treatments of drug-resistant generalized epilepsy include vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and corpus callosotomy (CC). Neurostimulation with VNS and/or DBS has been shown to be effective in reducing seizure frequency in patients with generalized epilepsy. DBS for generalized epilepsy is primarily consisted of open-loop stimulation directed at the centromedian (CM) nucleus in the thalamus, though closed-loop stimulation and additional targets are being explored. CC can be effective in treating some seizure types and can be performed using traditional surgical techniques or with the less invasive methods of laser ablation and radiosurgery. This current literature supports the use of VNS, DBS and CC, alone or in combination, as palliative treatments of drug-resistant generalized epilepsy.

Neurosurgery in canine epilepsy

Epilepsy surgery is functional neurosurgery applied to drug-resistant epilepsy. Although epilepsy surgery has been established and achieves fair to good outcomes in human medicine, it is still an underdeveloped area in veterinary medicine. With the spread of advanced imaging and neurosurgical modalities, intracranial surgery has become commonplace in the veterinary field, and, therefore, it is natural that expectations for epilepsy surgery increase. This review summarizes current standards of intracranial epilepsy surgery in human medicine and describes its current status and expectation in veterinary medicine. Intracranial epilepsy surgery is classified generally into resection surgery, represented by cortical resection, lobectomy, and lesionectomy, and disconnection surgery, such as corpus callosotomy and multiple subpial transection. In dogs with drug-resistant epilepsy, corpus callosotomy is available as a disconnection surgery for generalized epilepsy. However, other types of disconnection and resection surgeries for focal epilepsy are limited to experimental studies in laboratory dogs and/or anecdotal case reports of lesionectomy, such as tumor or encephalocele removal, without epileptogenic evidence. Veterinary epilepsy surgery is a new and challenging neurosurgery field; with the development of presurgical evaluations such as advanced electroencephalography and neuroimaging, it may become more readily practiced.

Corpus Callosotomy in the Modern Era: Origins, Efficacy, Technical Variations, Complications, and Indications

Corpus callosotomy is among the oldest surgeries performed for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). First performed in 1940, various studies have since assessed its outcomes in various patient populations in addition to describing different extents of sectioning and emerging technologies (i.e. endoscopic, laser interstitial thermal therapy, and radiosurgery). In order to capture the current state and offer a reappraisal, we comprehensively review corpus callosotomy's origins, efficacy for various seizure types, technical variations, complications, and indications and compare the procedure to vagus nerve stimulation therapy which has similar indications. We consider corpus callosotomy to be a safe and efficacious procedure that should be considered by clinicians when appropriate. Furthermore, it can also play an important role in treating patients with DRE in low-to-middle-income countries where resources are limited.

Neuromodulation for Refractory Epilepsy

Three neuromodulation therapies, all using implanted device and electrodes, have been approved to treat adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, namely, the vagus nerve stimulation in 1995, deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) in 2018 (2010 in Europe), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in 2014. Indications for VNS have more recently extended to children down to age of 4. Limited or anecdotal data are available in other epilepsy syndromes and refractory/super-refractory status epilepticus. Overall, neuromodulation therapies are palliative, with only a minority of patients achieving long-term seizure freedom, justifying favoring such treatments in patients who are not good candidates for curative epilepsy surgery. About half of patients implanted with VNS, ANT-DBS, and RNS have 50% or greater reduction in seizures, with long-term data suggesting increased efficacy over time. Besides their impact on seizure frequency, neuromodulation therapies are associated with various benefits and drawbacks in comparison to antiseizure drugs. Yet, we lack high-level evidence to best position each neuromodulation therapy in the treatment pathways of persons with difficult-to-treat epilepsy.

One-Year Cost-Effectiveness of Callosotomy Versus Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Seizures in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Decision Analytic Model

Objective

Palliative epilepsy surgery via corpus callosotomy (CC) or vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is commonly employed for drug‐resistant seizures in Lennox‐Gastaut Syndrome (LGS). VNS is less effective at reducing seizures but has fewer adverse events, CC is more effective for seizure control, particularly atonic seizures, but can be associated with serious adverse events, and yet their relative cost‐effectiveness remains unknown.

Methods

To determine which option is most cost‐effective, a decision analytic model was developed to evaluate the risks and benefits of CC and VNS at 1 year based on costs in the United States. Our primary outcome measure was positive seizure outcomes, defined as >50% seizure reduction without procedural complications.

Results

CC had a 15% greater likelihood of a positive seizure outcome, but per patient costs were $68 147 more than VNS, or $451 952 per positive seizure outcome gained. One‐way sensitivity analyses demonstrate that probabilities of seizure freedom or reduction by VNS or CC and CC cost were most influential on results. When considering atonic seizures, CC had a 27% greater positive outcome likelihood than VNS, the same incremental cost, and cost $250 556 per positive seizure outcome gained.

Significance

This exploratory model suggests that VNS is more cost‐effective relative to CC at 1 year.

Neuromodulation in epilepsy: state-of-the-art approved therapies

Three neuromodulation therapies have been appropriately tested and approved in refractory focal epilepsies: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS), and closed-loop responsive neurostimulation of the epileptogenic zone or zones. These therapies are primarily palliative. Only a few individuals have achieved complete freedom from seizures for more than 12 months with these therapies, whereas more than half have benefited from long-term reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%. Implantation-related adverse events primarily include infection and pain at the implant site. Intracranial haemorrhage is a frequent adverse event for ANT-DBS and responsive neurostimulation. Other stimulation-specific side-effects are observed with VNS and ANT-DBS. Biomarkers to predict response to neuromodulation therapies are not available, and high-level evidence to aid decision making about when and for whom these therapies should be preferred over other antiepileptic treatments is scant. Future studies are thus needed to address these shortfalls in knowledge, approve other forms of neuromodulation, and develop personalised closed-loop therapies with embedded machine learning. Until then, neuromodulation could be considered for individuals with intractable seizures, ideally after the possibility of curative surgical treatment has been carefully assessed and ruled out or judged less appropriate.

Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation following Corpus Callosotomy for Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

Objective: The effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for residual seizures after corpus callosotomy (CC) has not yet been fully investigated. We hypothesized that seizure control would be improved by VNS after CC. The purpose of this study was to compare seizure frequency between patients with implantation of a VNS generator (post-VNS group) or without VNS (non-post-VNS group) following CC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent CC between January 2009 and May 2019 in our institution. We evaluated proportions of ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders) and seizure reduction rate 1 and 2 years after VNS. To investigate factors related to responders, uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed regarding age, number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), addition of novel ASMs (levetiracetam, lacosamide or perampanel), and post-VNS or non-post-VNS status. Results: Thirteen post-VNS patients and 24 non-post-VNS patients were analyzed in this study. Responder rate at 1 year after VNS differed significantly between the post-VNS group (53.9%) and non-post-VNS group (12.5%, p = 0.017). Number of ASMs at the time of CC and post-VNS were significantly associated with responders in univariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.88, p = 0.025 and OR 8.2, 95%CI 1.6–41.6, p = 0.011, respectively), whereas age, sex, seizure frequency, and addition of novel ASMs were not. In multivariate analysis, the presence of VNS procedures after CC was the only factor favorably associated with responder status (OR 82.2, 95%CI 1.55–4355.7, p = 0.03). Conclusions: VNS therapy after CC may increase the proportion of responders independent of the addition of novel ASMs.