Multiple foreign body ingestion and ileal perforation

Surgical management of pediatric multiple magnet ingestions in the past two decades of minimal access surgery- systematic review of operative approaches

BACKGROUND

Multiple magnet ingestion is increasingly reported in paediatrics and can cause significant morbidity. Various surgical approaches exist, though minimal literature compares outcomes between techniques. This review evaluates laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted, and open surgery with regard to outcomes.

METHOD

Systematic review across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science identified reports of paediatric multiple magnet ingestion managed surgically between 2002 and 2022.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine studies were included, reporting data from 136 cases. Of these, 82 (60%) underwent laparotomy, 43 (32%) laparoscopic surgery, and 11 (8%) laparoscopic-assisted procedures. Sixteen laparoscopic cases were converted to open, often due to intraoperative findings including necrosis/perforation, or grossly dilated bowel. Bowel perforation occurred in 108 (79%); 47 (35%) required bowel resection, and 3 had temporary stoma formation. Postoperative recovery was uneventful in 118 (86%). Complications were reported following 15 (18%) open and 3 (7%) laparoscopic surgeries. No complications occurred following laparoscopic-assisted surgery. All post-laparoscopic complications were Clavien-Dindo (CD) Grade I. Following open surgery, 5 complications were CD grade I, 6 were CD grade II, and 4 were CD grade IIIb, requiring re-laparotomy. Median length of stay for open and laparoscopic-assisted procedures was 7 days, and for laparoscopic was 5 days (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical management of multiple magnet ingestion often achieved uncomplicated recovery and no long-term sequelae. Whilst open laparotomy was the more common approach, laparoscopic surgery was associated with reduced length of stay and postoperative complications. Therefore, in experienced hands, laparoscopic surgery should be considered first-line, with the possibility of conversion to open if required.

Severe post-pyloric injury after button battery ingestion: Systematic literature review and case report

BACKGROUND

The health and safety hazards related to button batteries (BB) have been extensively studied, highlighting that the presence of a button battery in the esophagus is a life-threatening emergency. However, complications related to bowel BB are poorly evaluated and not well known. The objective of this review of the literature was to describe severe cases of BB that have passed the pylorus.

CASE REPORT

This case, from the PilBouTox cohort, is the first report of small-bowel occlusion following ingestion of an LR44 BB (diameter: 11.4 mm) by a 7-month-old infant with a history of intestinal resections. In this case, the BB was ingested without a witness. The initial presentation mimicked acute gastroenteritis evolving into hypovolemic shock. An X-ray revealed a foreign body stuck in the small bowel causing an intestinal occlusion and local necrosis without perforation. The patient's history of intestinal stenosis and intestinal surgery were the contributing factor of impaction.

SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

The review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The research was conducted on September 12, 2022 through five database and the U.S. Poison Control Center website. An additional 12 severe cases of intestinal or colonic injury after ingestion of a single BB were identified. Of these, 11 were related to small BBs (< 15 mm) that impacted Meckel's diverticulum and one was related to postoperative stenosis.

CONCLUSION

In view of the findings, the indications for digestive endoscopy for extraction of a BB in the stomach should include a history of intestinal stenosis or intestinal surgery so as to avoid delayed intestinal perforation or occlusion and prolonged hospitalization.

Too attractive: the growing problem of magnet ingestions in children

BACKGROUND

Small, powerful magnets are increasingly available in toys and other products and pose a health risk. Small spherical neodymium magnets marketed since 2008 are of particular concern.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the incidence, characteristics, and management of single and multiple-magnet ingestions over time.

METHODS

Magnet ingestion cases at a tertiary children's hospital were identified using radiology reports from June 2002 to December 2012. Cases were verified by chart and imaging review. Relative risk regressions were used to determine changes in the incidence of ingestions and interventions over time.

RESULTS

Of 56 cases of magnet ingestion, 98% occurred in 2006 or later, and 57% involved multiple magnets. Median age was 8 years (range, 0-18 years). Overall, 21% of single and 88% of multiple ingestions had 2 or more imaging series obtained, whereas no single and 56.3% of multiple ingestions required intervention (25.0% endoscopy, 18.8% surgery, 12.5% both). Magnet ingestions increased in 2010 to 2012 compared with 2007 to 2009 (relative risk, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.0). Small, spherical magnets likely from magnet sets comprised 27% of ingestions, all ingested 2010 or later: 86% involved multiple magnets, 50% of which required intervention. Excluding these cases, ingestions of other magnets did not increase in 2010 to 2012 compared with 2007 to 2009 (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of pediatric magnet ingestions and subsequent interventions has increased over time. Multiple-magnet ingestions result in high utilization of radiological imaging and surgical interventions. Recent increases parallel the increased availability of small, spherical magnet sets. Young and at-risk children should not have access to these and other small magnets. Improved regulation and magnet safety standards are needed.

Ingestion of magnetic toys: report of serious complications requiring surgical intervention and a proposed management algorithm

CONTEXT

Increasing popularity of strong magnets as toys has led to their ingestion by children, putting them at risk of potentially harmful gastrointestinal tract injuries.

OBJECTIVES

To heighten physician awareness of the potential complications of magnetic foreign body ingestion, and to provide an updated algorithm for management of a patient who is suspected to have ingested magnets.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of magnet ingestions treated over a two-year period at our institutions in the Southern California Permanente Medical Group. Data including patient demographics, clinical information, radiologic images, and surgical records were used to propose a management strategy.

RESULTS

Five patients, aged 15 months to 18 years, presented with abdominal symptoms after magnet ingestion. Four of the 5 patients suffered serious complications, including bowel necrosis, perforation, fistula formation, and obstruction. All patients were successfully treated with laparoscopic-assisted exploration with or without endoscopy. Total days in the hospital averaged 5.2 days (range = 3 to 9 days). Average time to discharge following surgery was 4 days (range = 2 to 7 days). Ex vivo experimentation with toy magnetic beads were performed to reveal characteristics of the magnetic toys.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should have a heightened sense of caution when treating a patient in whom magnetic foreign body ingestion is suspected, because of the potential gastrointestinal complications. An updated management strategy is proposed that both prevents delays in surgical care and avoids unnecessary surgical exploration.

Magnetic FB injuries: an old yet unresolved hazard

RATIONALE AND AIM

Among foreign bodies causing injuries in children, magnets have been reported to cause serious complications and being life-threatening. The aim of this study is to design a risk profile and an epidemiological figure of such injuries, for being used for prevention.

METHODS

Data on 366 injuries have been collected from public surveillance databases and from published scientific literature, and compared with the data of the Susy Safe registry, which is a pan-European registry of foreign bodies injuries co-funded by the European Commission.

RESULTS

A median age of 48 months was observed, with a 63% prevalence of males is characterizing the injuries. Magnets have a median volume of 87.9 mm(3) vs the median volume of 41.86 mm(3) of the overall foreign bodies of the Susy Safe registry). Only 43% of the magnets were involving only on piece or objects, with a median number of two objects per injury, up to a maximum of 32 objects. Children are referred to the medical care system with a median delay of 3 days after onset of symptoms. Median length of stay in the hospital was 7 days with respect to 1 day as in the Susy Safe registry.

CONCLUSION

Most of complications, and event the death of a child can be eventually re-conducted to either or both a delay in patient referral or appropriate diagnosis. Thus, it is an absolute priority that an information initiative is taken toward families and emergency doctors to avoid unnecessarily delays respectively in patient referral and in diagnosis.

Bowel injuries caused by ingestion of multiple magnets in children: a growing hazard

PURPOSE

There are no definite guidelines on the management of ingested magnetic objects in children. The aim of this study was to present our experience and to highlight the importance of strict follow-up.

METHODS

Within 6 months period, four children presented to the emergency department after ingestion of multiple magnets. We reviewed retrospectively the patients' documents, radiological reports, operative findings and outcome. We also performed a literature search for all reports of multiple magnets ingestion on MEDLINE and EMBASE.

RESULTS

Daily abdominal radiographs to monitor migration of magnetic objects together with clinical examination revealed early detection of perforations in two patients. Explorative laparoscopy and suturing of perforations resulted in a rapid recovery and good cosmetic appearance. Literature search resulted in 44 published articles with a total of 52 cases of multiple magnet ingestion in children.

CONCLUSIONS

This report stresses the need for prompt follow-up and early detection of complications in order to operate those patients without delay. Laparoscopy is the method of choice in exploring the abdomen when perforation is suspected.

Hidden attraction: a menacing meal of magnets and batteries

BACKGROUND

Magnet and button battery ingestions are increasingly common, and can result in significant morbidity. Timely identification of hazardous foreign body ingestions can be difficult in non-verbal and non-disclosing children.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to present a case that demonstrates some of the challenges around identifying and correctly locating magnets and batteries, and the importance of prompt identification and removal.

CASE REPORT

We describe an older child with the covert ingestion of multiple magnets and batteries, with magnets that attracted across the stomach and a loop of jejunum. Mild symptoms and signs resulted in a delayed diagnosis and serious consequences. Radiographs suggested a gastric location of the foreign bodies.

CONCLUSION

Health care workers should consider the possibility of battery or magnet ingestions in children with vomiting and abdominal pain, even when well-appearing. Like esophageal batteries, multiple gastrointestinal magnets and combined magnet-battery ingestions can cause significant morbidity, and prompt identification is important. Providers should ask verbal children for ingestion histories, and consider radiographs when symptoms are atypical or persistent. Like esophageal batteries, gastrointestinal magnet-battery ingestions should be removed promptly to prevent complications. Caregivers should supervise or limit the use of toys that include magnets and batteries.

Magnet ingestion in dogs: two cases

Two dogs that had ingested foreign bodies were presented with vomiting. The foreign bodies appeared as metal and dense on abdominal radiographs. Abdominal exploratory identified intestinal perforation in one case and gastrointestinal tissue trapped between the two foreign bodies adhered to each other in the second case. The foreign bodies were identified as magnets in one case and magnets and other metallic foreign bodies in the second case. Both dogs had excellent outcomes following surgical intervention. These cases demonstrate the danger of tissue entrapment between the foreign bodies as a result of the magnetic attraction between two objects. Dogs that are presented with a history of or are suspect for ingesting multiple magnets or a magnet and metal foreign bodies should be treated with surgical intervention because of the risk of gastrointestinal perforation as a result of magnetic attraction between the foreign bodies.

Update on management of caustic and foreign body ingestion in children

The following recommendations for management of caustic and foreign body ingestion in children have been developed following a multicentre study performed by the Italian Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP). They are principally addressed to medical professionals involved in casualty. Because there is paucity of good quality clinical trials in children on this topic, many of the recommendations are currently extrapolated from adult experiences or based on experts opinions. The document represents a level 2 to 5 degree of evidence (according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence), gathered from clinical experience, recent studies, and expert reports discussed during a consensus conference of the Endoscopic Section of the Italian Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition. This working group comprises paediatricians, endoscopists, paediatric surgeons, toxicologists, and ENT surgeons, who are all actively involved in the management of these children. Recommendations are intended to serve as an aid to clinical judgement, not to replace it and therefore do not provide answers to every clinical question; nor does adherence to them ensure a successful outcome in every case. The ultimate decision on the clinical management of an individual patient will always depend on the specific clinical circumstances of the patient, and on the clinical judgement of the health care team.

Worldwide survey of damage from swallowing multiple magnets

BACKGROUND

It is increasingly recognized that in children swallowed multiple magnets cause considerable damage to the gastrointestinal tract.

OBJECTIVE

To emphasize that complications from swallowed magnets are extensive worldwide and throughout childhood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The author surveyed radiologists and researched cases of magnet swallowing in the literature and documented age and gender, numbers of magnets, nature of the magnets, reasons for swallowing, and clinical course.

RESULTS

A total of 128 instances of magnet swallowing were identified, one fatal. Cases from 21 countries were found. Magnet swallowing occurred throughout childhood, with most children older than 3 years of age. Numbers of swallowed magnets ranged up to 100. Twelve children were known to be autistic. Many reasons were given for swallowing magnets, and a wide range of gastrointestinal damage was encountered. Considerable delay before seeking medical assistance was frequent, as was delay before obtaining radiographs or US imaging.

CONCLUSION

Damage from swallowing multiple magnets is a considerable worldwide problem. More educational and preventative measures are needed.

Toy magnet ingestion in children: revising the algorithm

The widespread popularity of magnetic toy sets has resulted in increased reports of magnet ingestion and subsequent complications. Traditional algorithms for ingested foreign bodies have advocated passage of these objects through the gastrointestinal tract spontaneously. In regard to magnet ingestion, the unique mechanism of pathogenesis, attraction of 2 or more magnets across multiple loops of bowel, has led to several cases of intestinal perforation caused by bowel wall erosion and necrosis between the magnets. Unfortunately, a misdiagnosis and misconception that a solitary magnet has been ingested may lead to a delay in diagnosis and subsequent severe and possibly preventable complications. We report a case in which a child presented having thought to have ingested a solitary magnetic toy from a magnet construction set. This resulted in the premature discharge from the hospital and the patient's subsequent return with an intraabdominal perforation resulting in an emergency laparotomy. The recent increase of case reports related to magnet ingestion has resulted in proposed treatment regimens for patients ingesting multiple magnets. We would also initiate the magnet algorithm if even presumably a single magnet was ingested. This would include close observation and early intervention, either with endoscopy or surgical exploration, which would theoretically prevent the more severe complications, reported in the literature.

Massive Strontium Ferrite Ingestion without Acute Toxicity

Ingestion of strontium ferrite is previously unreported. We document absorption of strontium without acute toxicity. A 22 year-old schizophrenic man was brought to hospital after he was witnessed to pulverize and ingest flexible adhesive magnets, which later were identified as strontium ferrite. Other than auditory hallucinations his vital signs, physical examination, ECG and routine laboratories were unremarkable. Abdominal radiographs revealed diffuse radiopaque material. He was treated with whole bowel irrigation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) until radiographically cleared. His initial blood and urine strontium levels were 2900 microg/l and 15,000 microg/l, respectively (reference range for urine: <240 microg/l, occupational threshold 800 microg/l). A repeat urine level one week later was 370 microg/l. His hospital course was complicated by bacteraemia secondary to a thrombophlebitis at the site of the intravenous catheter, and the patient was treated with intravenous and oral antibiotics. He remained otherwise asymptomatic and was discharged to a psychiatric unit approximately 3 weeks later. Although clearly absorbed, strontium ferrite does not appear to produce acute toxicity. Delayed, and or chronic toxicity cannot be excluded based on this report.

Ingestion of unusual foreign bodies and malrotation: a "perfect storm"

Management of foreign body ingestion is usually nonsurgical unless atypical foreign bodies or anatomical variants are suspected. The present article illustrates a case of atypical foreign bodies ingestion in the presence of intestinal malrotation. The patient required surgical treatment and had an uneventful postoperative recovery. The article also reviews the cases reported in the literature of magnetic ingestion and the possible complications associated with it.