Elective laparoscopic gastrostomy in children: potential for an enhanced recovery protocol

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for gastrostomy tube insertion in patients younger than 14 years of age: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have improved treatment outcomes and have standardized patient care.

OBJECTIVES

Identify the benefit of introducing the ERAS protocol for feeding after gastrostomy insertion with or without Nissen fundoplication, the effects on the time of reaching the full feeds the length of stay single-center experience, and complications associated with early feeding protocols.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Tertiary hospital METHODS: The study review included cases performed between 2015 and 2021 by four surgeons, and cases performed in 2022 by all surgeons using ERAS feeding protocol (P) in a tertiary hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comparison the mean and mode of the length of stay (LOS) and the time until the patient reached full feed (TFF).

SAMPLE SIZE

224 patients; 181 by the four surgeons and 43 cases by the ERAS protocol group.

RESULTS

The difference in the ERAS protocol from the four surgeons in TFF and LOS was statistically significant (P<.001). There was no noticeable difference in postoperative complications after introducing the ERAS protocol.

CONCLUSION

ERAS improved the TFF and decreased the LOS without any increase in procedure complications. Increasing bed utilization and reducing costs were two benefits of reducing LOS at our hospital.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study, which may not be generalizable. Multiple comorbidities. Travel time from different parts of the country could impact LOS. Retrospective and thus dependent on the accuracy of the information in file notes.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Evaluating caretaker satisfaction with same-day discharge after gastrostomy tube placement

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement, using written and video-based preoperative education, has been our standard institutional practice since 2017. We aim to evaluate caretaker satisfaction with this protocol.

METHODS

All patients planned for SDD after G-tube placement from February 2021-February 2022 were identified. Chart review was performed to identify demographic information, successful same-day discharge or reason for postoperative admission, time to first postoperative feed, length of stay (LOS), and complications requiring emergency department evaluation, readmission, or reoperation. Telephone follow-up at two weeks postoperatively was conducted to evaluate satisfaction with the SDD protocol.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were eligible for SDD with a median age of 1.1 years [0.7, 4.4]. Forty-two (86%) patients were successfully discharged the same day with a median LOS of 7.5 h [6.7, 8.1], and 7 (14%) were admitted postoperatively for further education or emesis with a median LOS of 30.4 h [26.9, 31.2]. Median time to initiation of feeds was 2.3 h [1.7, 2.9]. 8 (16%) patients were evaluated in the emergency department within 30 days postoperatively, resulting in two re-admissions: one for peri‑stomal erythema and fever requiring oral antibiotics at 21 days and one for G-tube dislodgement requiring reoperation and replacement at 28 days. On two-week telephone follow-up, 42 caretakers (100%) felt that their education was adequate for same-day discharge and felt comfortable with the same-day discharge protocol. Six (14%) caretakers stated their child's pain was not well controlled at some point between discharge and survey follow-up, and three caretakers (7%) called a provider within the first 24 h for issues with pain. Forty-one caretakers (98%) expressed satisfaction going home the day of surgery.

CONCLUSION

Caretaker satisfaction and comfort with same-day discharge following laparoscopic G-tube placement are high, ascribed to comprehensive preoperative education and anticipatory guidance.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognostic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

Comparing Different Techniques in Children With or Without a Simultaneous Fundoplication: Does the Gastrostomy Technique Matter?

Purpose: To evaluate the results of different gastrostomy techniques and the impact of simultaneous fundoplication. Materials and Methods: The patients who underwent a gastrostomy procedure between 2009 and 2019 in a single tertiary center were evaluated retrospectively. The patients are divided into groups depending on the gastrostomy techniques as open gastrostomy (OG), laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and laparoscopy-assisted PEG (LAPEG). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes are compared among the groups. Results: Two hundred forty-four patients (75, 60, 91, and 18 patients in OG, LG, PEG, and LAPEG groups, respectively) are enrolled in the study. Although rates of minor or major complications did not demonstrate a significant difference among the groups, no major complications were encountered in the LAPEG group, while the lowest minor complications were observed in the PEG group (P > .05). Length of postoperative initiation of enteral feeding and length of hospital stay (LOS) were highest in the OG group (P = .000). Performing a concurrent fundoplication procedure significantly delayed the initiation of enteral feeding and increased the LOS in all of the groups (P < .005). Conclusions: Although PEG is a safe and reproducible technique of gastrostomy in selected patients, LAPEG may expand the boundaries of PEG by reducing the major complication rates. Although simultaneous fundoplication may complicate the perioperative period, it does not have significance on outcomes.

Same-day discharge for pediatric laparoscopic gastrostomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrostomy is a common procedure in children. We developed a same-day discharge (SDD) protocol for laparoscopic button gastrostomy.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of children undergoing laparoscopic button gastrostomy and were eligible for SDD from August 2017-September 2019. Patients were eligible if: 1) the family was comfortable with eliminating overnight admission and were suitable candidates for outpatient surgery (absence of major co-morbidities), 2) they were not undergoing additional procedures requiring admission, and 3) they received pre-operative education.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients who underwent laparoscopic button gastrostomy were eligible for SDD. The median age was 2.1 years [IQR 0.9-4.1], and the median weight was 10.5 kg [IQR 7.6-15.5]. Forty-one (66%) were previously nasogastric fed. The median operative time was 22 min [IQR 16-29]. The median time to initiation of feeds was 4.4 h [IQR 3.4-5.5]. Fifty-one (82%) were discharged the same day with a median length of stay of 9 h [IQR 7-10]. Eleven were admitted, most commonly for further teaching. Eleven SDD patients were seen in the emergency room <30 days at a median 5 days [IQR 3-12] post-operatively, primarily for mechanical complications.

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge following laparoscopic gastrostomy is safe and feasible for select pediatric patients who undergo pre-operative education. The SDD pathway results in a low admission rate and relatively low ER visits.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective Observational Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.