Postoperative "complications" following laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty: A systematic review

High-pressure distal colostogram in diagnosing anorectal malformations for male patients: our experience to get a high-quality image

OBJECTIVE

To summarize our experience with high-pressure distal colostogram (HPC) in diagnosing male anorectal malformations (ARMs) after colostomy.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 103 male patients with anorectal malformations admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022. All children were found to have anal atresia after birth, with no obvious fistula in the perineum. A colostomy was performed 1-3 days after birth due to a suspected rectourethral fistula. A high-pressure distal colostogram was conducted on 98 patients who met the criteria and were included in this study. There were 68 cases of transverse colostomy, 13 cases of descending colostomy, and 17 cases of sigmoid colostomy. The average age is 3.60 ± 1.56(1.20-8.67) months. The type of anorectal malformation was confirmed during subsequent anorectoplasty.

RESULTS

74 (75.5%) patients showed the rectal bladder fistula or rectourethral fistula through a high-pressure distal colostogram, including 14 cases of rectal bladder fistula, 23 cases of rectal prostatic fistula, 37 cases of recto-bulbar fistula. Three children (3.1%) showed tiny fistulas to the perineum and were identified as having rectoperineal fistulas. Twenty-one (21.4%) patients could not show the fistula during the colostogram. These patients were placed with a catheter into the bladder, the contrast was injected into the bladder then the high-pressure distal colostogram was conducted to determine the fistula. Ten children (10.2%) showed a tapered configuration at the distal rectal pouch's anterior aspect before the fistula protruded into the urethra. Based on the position of the fistula and the urethra, 2 cases of rectaurethral prostatic fistula and 8 cases of rectourethral bulbar fistula were determined. Seven cases (7.1%) had a distal rectum extended to the anterior urethra through a fistula and ended subcutaneously at the junction of the penis and scrotum, diagnosed as a rectoperineal fistula. Four patients showed no obvious abnormalities in the external genitalia, while three patients had skin depression at the junction of the penis and scrotum. Four cases (4.1%) presented a symmetrical blind distal rectum extending towards the anus, these were identified as imperforate anus without fistula. The type of anorectal malformation and the location of the rectourethral fistula shown in the colostogram were consistent with the confirmed results during subsequent anorectoplasty.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, a properly performed high-pressure distal colostogram combined with voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) can identify the type of anorectal malformations and the location of the fistula in males.

Laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty for anorectal malformation with rectobulbar fistula: A two-center comparative study with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Due to the controversy on the feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for the treatment of the anorectal malformation (ARM) with rectobulbar fistula (RBF), this study aimed to compare the outcomes of LAARP and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for ARM with RBF. Demographic data, postoperative complications, and bowel function of RBF patients who underwent LAARP and PSARP at 2 medical centers from 2016-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-eight children with RBF were enrolled, including 43 in the LAARP group and 45 in the PSARP group. There were no significant differences in the sacral ratio (P = .222) or sacral agenesis (P = .374). Thirty-seven and 38 patients in the LAARP and PSARP groups were followed up for a median of 4.14 years. The postoperative complications were comparable between the groups (P = .624), with no cases of urethral diverticulum. The urination of all cases was normal and no evidence of cyst formation was found on MCU or MRI during the follow-up period. The incidence of rectal prolapse was similar between the 2 groups (9.3% vs 17.8%, P = .247). The groups had equivalent Bowel Function Score (15.29 ± 2.36 vs 15.58 ± 2.88, P = .645), but the LAARP group had better voluntary bowel movement (94.6% vs 84.2%, P = .148) by Krickenbeck classification. The intermediate-term outcomes of LAARP show that the urethral diverticulum was rare by the intraluminal incision of the fistular and the bowel function was comparable to that of PSARP in ARM with rectobulbar fistula. However, LAARP was associated with smaller perineal wounds.

Evaluation of Anal Sphincter with High Resolution Anorectal Manometry and 3D Reconstruction in Patients with Anorectal Malformation

BACKGROUND

Patients with anorectal malformation (ARM) need long-term follow-up, in order to evaluate fecal continence; the main predictors of longer-term success are the type of ARM, associated anomalies and sacral integrity. Three-Dimensional High Resolution Anorectal Manometry (3D-HRAM) gives detailed information on pressure on the anal complex profile. Our objective was to analyze anal sphincter activity in ARM patients with 3D-HRAM establishing the correlation between manometric and clinical data.

METHODS

Forty ARM patients were submitted to 3D-HRAM: manometric, anatomical and clinical scores were correlated with each other and with the bowel management response (BM).

RESULTS

A positive correlation between all scores and types of ARM was found: in high ARM and in patients with spinal anomalies (regardless to ARM type) lower scores were reported and even after BM they did not achieve good continence.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-HRAM gives detailed data on the functional activity of the anal sphincter complex. Our study revealed a correlation between manometric parameters and clinical outcomes, confirming spinal malformations and ARM type as the most important prognostic risk factors for a bad outcome. Specific sphincteric defects can also be explored with manometry, allowing for tailored bowel management strategies.

Rectal Prolapse Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management

BACKGROUND

The incidence and optimal management of rectal prolapse following repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM) has not been well-defined.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium registry. All children with a history of ARM repair were included. Our primary outcome was rectal prolapse. Secondary outcomes included operative management of prolapse and anoplasty stricture following operative management of prolapse. Univariate analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with our primary and secondary outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess the association between laparoscopic ARM repair and rectal prolapse.

RESULTS

A total of 1140 patients met inclusion criteria; 163 (14.3%) developed rectal prolapse. On univariate analysis, prolapse was significantly associated with male sex, sacral abnormalities, ARM type, ARM complexity, and laparoscopic ARM repairs (p < 0.001). ARM types with the highest rates of prolapse included rectourethral-prostatic fistula (29.2%), rectovesical/bladder neck fistula (28.8%), and cloaca (25.0%). Of those who developed prolapse, 110 (67.5%) underwent operative management. Anoplasty strictures developed in 27 (24.5%) patients after prolapse repair. After controlling for ARM type and hospital, laparoscopic ARM repair was not significantly associated with prolapse (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 1.50 (0.84, 2.66), p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Rectal prolapse develops in a significant subset of patients following ARM repair. Risk factors for prolapse include male sex, complex ARM type, and sacral abnormalities. Further research investigating the indications for operative management of prolapse and operative techniques for prolapse repair are needed to define optimal treatment.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging localization: A helpful addition to laparoscopic dissection and division of rectourethral fistulae

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistulae (RUF) are the most prevalent type of anorectal malformations in boys, with various surgical treatment methods investigated in recent years. Currently, research is focused on preventing urethral damage or urethral diverticulum formation caused by imprecise dissection during the laparoscopically assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) technique. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging to improve the localization and separation of the RUF during laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

ICG was intrarectally injected through a pre-inserted gastric tube at the distal enterostomy port to locate the fistula. This retrospective analysis included children with RUF who were treated surgically with ICG fluorescence imaging localization-assisted LAARP between January and June 2022. We investigated the patient demographics, perioperative conditions, and subsequent follow-up results.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent ICG-assisted LAARP. Their median age was 80 days (range, 63-120) and the median duration of each procedure was 145 min (range, 120-165). Postoperatively, the duration of catheter retention and hospital stay was eight days. The children's prognosis was based on the follow-up outcomes of gastrointestinal, urinary tract function, and imaging examination. None of the included patients was diagnosed with urinary diverticulum, urinary tract injury, anal stricture, or rectal prolapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of ICG at the end of the rectum during LAARP surgery is a feasible adjunct for locating the RUF, providing a greater degree of accuracy for laparoscopic separation and resection of fistulae, thereby decreasing the risk of urological complications.

Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty versus conventional procedures for anorectal malformation: a retrospective nationwide database study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopically assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and conventional procedures (CPs) for anorectal malformation (ARM) using a national inpatient database in Japan.

METHODS

Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients who underwent anorectoplasty for high- or intermediate-type ARMs from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcomes were postoperative rectal prolapse, anal stenosis, and general complications. Secondary outcomes were the duration of anesthesia and length of hospital stay. We performed 1:2 propensity score-matched analyses to compare the outcomes between the LAARP and CP groups.

RESULTS

We identified 1005 eligible patients, comprising 286 and 719 patients who underwent LAARP and CP, respectively. The propensity score-matched groups included 281 patients with LAARP and 562 with CP. The LAARP group showed a higher proportion of rectal prolapse (21.4% vs. 8.5%; odds ratio, 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.89-4.48; p < 0.001) and longer duration of anesthesia (462 min vs. 365 min; difference, 90 min; 95% CI 43-137; p < 0.001) than the CP group. No significant differences were found in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

LAARP had worse outcomes than CP in terms of rectal prolapse. Thus, we propose that LAARP may require technical refinement to improve patient outcomes.

Where Is the Vagina? A Rectal Stricture after a Presumed Cloacal Repair Turns Out to be the Mobilized Vagina and a Missed High Rectovaginal Fistula

We present a case of a rare complication in a 10-month-old female referred to our institution for an anal stricture after primary cloacal repair as an infant. Multimodal imaging, careful physical exam, and endoscopic evaluation revealed her vagina had been pulled through to the location of her anal sphincter muscle complex. We describe the correction of this problem, including identification of her rectum.

Pattern of anatomic disorder and surgical management of anorectal prolapse in anorectal malformation

AIM

Due to the paucity of data and controversy regarding the etiology and surgical approach for managing anorectal prolapse (ARP) after anorectoplasty, we sought to investigate the underlying anatomic disorder and the surgical outcome in managing this challenging complication.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on 83 patients with ARP related to anorectal malformations (ARM). Logistic regression analyses were performed to detect the risk factors for the ARP severity. Surgical procedures were stratified according to identified anatomical abnormalities and surgical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

50 patients (62.7%) had high-type ARM. The original anorectoplasty had a higher rate of ARP in laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (n = 49, 59.0%) versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (n = 11, 13.3%). ARP was associated with rectal fat hyperplasia (67.5%), dilated muscular tunnel (79.5%), longitudinal muscle (LM) discontinuity (16.9%), rectal dilation (22.9%), mislocated anus (7.2%), and excessive mobile mesorectum (3.6%). Based on the ARP severity, the patients were divided into a severe group (Group 1, n = 38) and a moderate group (Group 2, n = 45). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that hyperplasia rectal fat (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.16-17.84), rectal dilation (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.05-16.94), and high-type ARM (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.14-7.39) were independent risk factors for the development of severe ARP. Complications after stratified surgical repair included wound infection in six patients (7.2%), anal stenosis in one patient (1.2%), and ARP recurrence in two patients (2.4%). Twenty-six patients without colostomy before prolapse repair were followed up for 2 to 12 years. All the patients maintained voluntary bowel movements. Following ARP repair, there was an overall higher rate of no soiling or grade 1 soiling (88.5 vs. 65.4%), but 3 of 12 patients with grade 2 constipation were upgraded to grade 3.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that ARM-related anorectal prolapse is associated with excessive rectum, hyperplasia of rectal fat, mobile mesorectum, loose muscular tunnel, LM discontinuity, and anal mislocation. Surgical repair with techniques stratified according to the patients' underlying risk factors is effective to prevent recurrence and improve the soiling continence.

Long-term outcomes of male imperforate anus with recto-urethral fistula: laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

PURPOSE

A five-parameter fecal continence evaluation questionnaire (FCEQ) and incidence of complications were used for long-term assessment of laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) and posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for treating male imperforate anus (MIA) with rectobulbar (RB) or rectoprostatic (RP) fistulas.

METHODS

Subjects were 64 consecutive Japanese MIA patients with RB or RP fistulas treated at a single institution between 1995 and 2021. FCEQ data collected retrospectively were used to calculate a fecal continence evaluation (FCE) score (best = 10) and coefficient of variation for FCE (FCECV). The statistical significance threshold was defined at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Fistulas were RB (n = 40; LAARP = 25/40, PSARP = 15/40) or RP (n = 24; LAARP = 17/24, PSARP = 7/24). Mean ages at surgery and status of the sacrum were similar (p = 0.06, 0.05 and 0.51). FCE scores in RP-LAARP were consistently higher with less FCECV but differences were only statistically significant from 7 years postoperatively (p < 0.05). While FCE scores for RB-LAARP and RB-PSARP were similar (p = 0.99), FCECV were lower for RB-LAARP compared with RB-PSARP. LAARP was associated with less-wound infections, but greater incidence of anal mucosal prolapse unrelated to preoperative status of the sacrum.

CONCLUSION

Long-term postoperative FCEQ assessment favored LAARP for treating MIA with either RB or RP fistulas.

Laparoscopic management of common cloaca: Current status

AIM

This study reviewed the literature on the laparoscopic management of cloaca.

METHODS

A Medline and Embase search was performed for "laparoscopy" and "cloaca." Articles for which full-text in English was not available, duplicate articles, and review articles were excluded. Demographic characteristics, duration of follow-up, length of common channel, postoperative complications, and functional outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The database search retrieved 81 articles after excluding unrelated articles and identified new articles through cross-referencing 14 articles (72 patients) for this review. The rectal pouch was situated below the pubococcygeal (PC) line in three patients. In all other patients, the rectum was located above the PC line. Only the rectal component of the malformation was repaired laparoscopically in 80% (58/72). Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic mobilization of the rectum and urogenital component. The length of the common channel was more than 3 cm in all these fourteen patients. The most common complication was rectal prolapse (n = 11). Functional evaluation by Krickenbeck scoring system was reported in 32 patients, of which 6/32 (18.75%) had fecal soiling > Grade 2.

DISCUSSION

Until recently, laparoscopy for the common cloaca was almost exclusively used in patients with low urogenital sinus with high rectal pouch. Moreover, only the rectal component was repaired laparoscopically. Recently, laparoscopic rectal mobilization and urogenital separation was described for patients with common channel length ≥3 cm. It has been reported that laparoscopic vaginal mobilization is easy and more complete by this technique and may avoid vaginal replacement in most of these patients with the long common channel. However, only two studies have reported this technique, and its reproducibility and long-term results are still awaited. Another interesting observation was the increasing use of urethral length along with common channel length in determining the appropriate procedure for the patients with common cloaca. Recent studies propose that the urogenital separation technique be preferred over urogenital mobilization in patients with the short urethra. Nonetheless, we still don't have long-term comparative data to demonstrate that the functional outcomes are better with this new algorithm. We conclude that the persistent cloaca needs an individualized approach, and laparoscopy can be utilized to mobilize the high rectum and is also helpful for the urogenital separation in patients with common channel length >3 cm. However, at present, there is no conclusive evidence to support that laparoscopic repair has a better functional outcome than the open approach.