Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation with recto anal repair: a new technique for the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoids

What can patients expect in the long term from radiofrequency thermocoagulation of hemorrhoids on bleeding, prolapse, quality of life, and recurrence: "no pain, no gain" or "no pain but a gain"?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of hemorrhoidal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) on bleeding, prolapse, quality of life (QoL), and recurrence.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study, with RFT performed using procedure modified via hemorrhoid exteriorization assessed the evolution of hemorrhoidal prolapse rated by Goligher scale; bleeding and discomfort (0-10), feeling of improvement and satisfaction (-5 to +5/5) by analog scales; the impact of hemorrhoids on QoL by HEMO-FISS-QoL score.

RESULTS

From April 2016 to January 2021, 124 patients underwent surgery and 107 were interviewed in September 2021. The average follow-up was 30 months (range, 8-62 months). The mean work stoppage was 3 days, none in 71.0% of the cases. A mean of 4,334 J was applied. No analgesics were required for 66.4% of patients. External hemorrhoidal thrombosis was the only immediate complication in 9 patients, with no long-term reported complication. Bleeding disappeared in 53 out of 102 patients or dropped from 7 to 3 out of 10 (P<0.001). Prolapse reduced from mean grade 3 to 2 (P<0.001), discomfort from 7 to 2 out of 10 (P<0.001). HEMO-FISS-QoL score improved from 22 to 7 out of 100 (P<0.001). Feeling of improvement and overall satisfaction rate were +4/5. Recurrence occurred in 21.5% of patients at 22 months, and 6 required reoperation. Of the patients, 91.6% would choose the same procedure again and 96.3% recommend it.

CONCLUSION

RFT, although imperfect, leads to a significant improvement in hemorrhoidal symptoms and a lasting increase in QoL with minimal pain and downtime, high acceptance, and low complication and recurrence rates.

The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease

The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.

Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Internal Hemorrhoids: A Multicenter Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) with mucopexy to Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in terms of recurrence rates and quality of life.

BACKGROUND

There is uncertainty regarding the durability of the therapeutic effect of THD with mucopexy compared with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in terms of recurrence rates.

METHODS

This was a multicenter prospective study. Participating surgeons performed the operation they knew best enrolling 10 patients each. Surgeons' unedited videos were reviewed by an independent expert. Patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns were eligible. The primary endpoint was recurrence rates defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction were evaluated with Pain Scale and Brief Pain Inventory, Fecal Incontinence Quality Of Life (FIQOL), Cleveland Clinic Incontinence, Constipation, Short-Form 12 scores, and Patient satisfaction (4-point Likert) scale.

RESULTS

Twenty surgeons enrolled 197 patients. THD patients had lower Visual pain scores at postoperative day (POD) 1 (6.2 vs 8.3, P =0.047), POD7 (4.5 vs 7.7, P =0.021), POD14 (2.8 vs 5.3, P <0.001), and medication use at POD14 (23% vs 58%, P <0.001). Median follow-up was 3.1 (1.0-5.5) years. Recurrence rates did not differ between the study arms (5.9% vs 2.4%, P =0.253). Patient satisfaction rate was higher after THD at POD14 (76.4% vs 52.5%, P =0.031) and 3 months (95.1% vs 63.3%, P =0.029), but did not differ at 6 months (91.7% vs 88%, P =0.228) and 1 year (94.2% vs 88%, P =0.836).

CONCLUSION

THD with mucopexy was associated with improved patient-reported outcomes and quality of life as compared with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy with nonsignificantly different recurrence rates.

Simple mucopexy and hemorrhoidal arterial ligation with and without Doppler guide: a randomized clinical trial for short-term outcome

PURPOSE

Hemorrhoids are the most common benign anorectal diseases. Mucopexy strengthens the anal canal mucosa, which can be performed alone or in combination with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL). In this study, we compared the postoperative complications between simple mucopexy plus HAL with and without a Doppler guide.

METHODS

This study was performed as a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Patients referred to a tertiary colorectal referral clinic with grades 3 and 4 hemorrhoids who were candidates for surgical intervention entered the study. Thirty-six patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A including 18 patients underwent mucopexy and DG-HAL and the other 18 patients (group B) underwent standard mucopexy and HAL without a Doppler guide. Postoperative pain score and the duration of oral analgesic consumption were recorded. Additionally, postoperative symptoms and complications were recorded and compared between the 2 methods.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of pain score and the duration of postoperative analgesic consumption as well as the incidence of postoperative complications. Besides, the primary grade of hemorrhoids was not significantly associated with recurrence, but there was a significant association between body mass index and Wexner score (WS) with recurrence. The mean WS of patients showed a significant decrease in both groups postoperatively. However, the rate of WS reduction was not remarkably different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Simple mucopexy with blind HAL (without Doppler guide) might be considered for the treatment of grades 3 and 4 hemorrhoids effectively.

[Hemorrhoidal artery ligation without Doppler navigation in surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the immediate and long-term results of surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease (GD) stage II-III using two methods of identification of hemorrhoidal arteries (HA) with their subsequent ligation and mucopexy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of HA ligation with and without Doppler navigation. The study included 120 patients: group A - Doppler-guided ligation (n=60) and group B - ligation without ultrasound (n=60).

RESULTS

GD stage II was found in 27 patients of the group A and 30 patients of the group B (p=0.4). Mean number of ligated HA in the group A was 3.36, in the group B - 2.83 (p=0.062). Mean number of mucopexy was 3.2 and 3.5, respectively (p=0.8). Mean follow-up period was 8.3±2.1 and 8.1±1.9 months, respectively (p=0.96). Relapse of all preoperative symptoms was registered in 1 patient (1.6%) in the group A. Intermittent bleeding was observed in 5 (8.3%) and 3 (5%) patients, respectively (p=0.71). Periodic hemorrhoid prolapse (GP) occurred in 6 (10%) and 4 (6.6%) respondents, respectively (p=0.74). VAS score of pain syndrome after 2 months and later was 0 - 1 points (p=1.0). Most of patients in both groups (group A - 89%, group B - 94%; p=0.7) noted that surgery did not disrupt their usual lifestyle and relieved from symptoms of GD.

CONCLUSION

There are no significant advantages of Doppler-guided HA ligation compared to palpation regarding incidence of hemorrhoid prolapse (p=0.74) and hemorrhoidal bleeding (p=0.71). Pain syndrome (p=0.24), incidence of postoperative complications (p=0.51) and relapses (p=0.31) showed comparable safety of both techniques.

A new technique of doppler dearterialization for hemorrhoidal disease: arterial detection ligation (ADL)

PURPOSE

We describe the arterial detection ligation (ADL) technique, designed to find arteries at time-appropriate depth for ligating, and report our preliminary results of using this technique to treat patients with the hemorrhoidal disease (HD).

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective analysis were patients with symptomatic grades 2 or 3 HD. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, postoperative complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction of the patients treated with ADL.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients were included in the study (male/female ratio 1.88; mean age 48 ± 19 years; mean BMI 24 ± 3 kg/m²). Thirty-nine patients (52%) did not require hospitalization and were discharged from the day clinic approximately 4 h postoperatively. Four patients (5.3%) suffered tenesmus for about 1 week postoperatively and two (2.7%) suffered temporary rectal bleeding. The mean VAS scores 1 day postoperatively, then at 1 week, 1 month and 1 year were 2.9, 1.5, 0.4, and 0, respectively. At the 1-month follow-up, there was no sign of recurrence and the satisfaction rate was 78.6% (n = 59). At the 1-year follow-up, three patients (4%) had a recurrence and the satisfaction rate was 86.7% (n = 65).

CONCLUSION

Based on our preliminary findings, ADL is an effective technique for treating HD, generally as an outpatient procedure, without serious morbidity. We anticipate that the incidence of tenesmus, which is encountered frequently after other dearterialization methods, will be lower after the ADL technique, which avoids both mass ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries deeper than 12 mm and running a long mucopexy suture line.

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: Lessons learned from a personal series of 200 consecutive cases and a proposal for a tailor-made procedure

Background

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is an effective treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD). However, the surgical technique is not standardized and the results for advanced HD are controversial. The aim of this study was to assess surgical outcomes after a long follow-up and compare total and partial mucopexy.

Materials and methods

Between March 2011 and July 2014, THD was offered to patients with symptomatic prolapsed hemorrhoids (Grades II, III and IV). Dearterialization was performed with the guidance of Ultrasound Doppler and mucopexy for prolapsed piles, and regarded as total or partial (if less than 6 mucopexies). Post-operative complications, long-term results and patients’ satisfaction rates were analyzed.

Results

200 consecutive patients were recruited with a mean follow-up of 43 months (range 29 - 57 months). HD distribution was GII (N = 35, 17.5%), GIII (N = 124, 62%), and GIV (N = 41, 20.5%). Postoperative complications included transient tenesmus (26,5%), pain (14%) and fecal impaction (2,5%). Recurrence rates were 0, 2,4% and 17,1% for prolapse (p < 0,01) and 2,9%, 4% and 9,8% for bleeding (p = 0,33) in grades II, III and IV, respectively. Total mucopexy resulted in more tenesmus (31,2%) than partial mucopexy (14,5%), (p < 0,01). After 12 weeks of follow-up, 85% of patients were either very satisfied or satisfied; 8,5% were dissatisfied.

Conclusion

THD-mucopexy is safe with low overall recurrence. Grade IV HD is associated with more recurrence and postoperative complications. Total mucopexy is associated with more tenesmus, pain and fecal impaction. A tailor-made procedure with selective dearterialization and mucopexy may be the next step in this evolving technique.

•

.THD is safe procedure for hemorrhoids with low overall recurrence of prolapse and bleeding.

•

.THD for grade IV hemorrhoidal disease is associated with more recurrence.

•

.THD with partial mucopexy achieves similar good results compared to total mucopexy.

•

.THD with total mucopexy is associated with more postoperative tenesmus, pain and fecal impaction.

•

.The number of dearterializations and mucopexies should be tailor-made.

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing HAL-RAR Versus Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy: Postoperative Pain, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of hemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair (HAL-RAR) and excisional hemorrhoidectomy (EH). The primary objective was to compare postoperative pain, and the secondary objectives were the following: symptom resolution rates, postoperative morbidity, recurrence, and changes in quality of life.

METHOD

Prospective randomized controlled trial, including 40 patients with grades III-IV hemorrhoids who were allocated 1:1 to HAL-RAR and EH. Follow-up evaluation was performed at 15 days, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually. Pain was measured using a Visual Analogic Scale and was self-recorded by patients. Quality of life was measured with Short Form Survey-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Postoperative pain was lower in the HAL-RAR group during the first 30 postoperative days. Moreover, from day 7 onward more patients in the HAL-RAR group reported complete absence of pain (Visual Analogic Scale score = 0). Globally, symptom resolution was significantly higher ( P = .03) in the HAL-RAR group at day 15. Bleeding resolution was observed earlier in the HAL-RAR group than in the EH group ( P = .04), but no differences in the resolution of prolapse, itching, and soiling were observed during the 30-day follow-up. After a mean follow-up of 15 months (range 12-27 months), no differences in postoperative morbidity and no recurrences were observed. An improvement was observed in all sections evaluated by the Short Form Survey-36 questionnaire with both techniques.

CONCLUSION

HAL-RAR provokes less postoperative pain during a shorter period than EH and achieves resolution of hemorrhoidal symptoms with less postoperative complaints. No differences in morbidity and recurrence rate were observed after 12 months of follow-up.

Effect of acupuncture on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: a randomized controlled trial

Objectives

To observe the clinical efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) in relieving pain after hemorrhoidectomy treatment for mixed hemorrhoids.

Design

This was a randomized controlled trial.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, single-blind, and randomized controlled clinical trial. Seventy-two patients with mixed hemorrhoids who had undergone hemorrhoidectomy were randomly assigned to the following 2 groups: the EA treatment group (EA) received surround needling with EA (n=36), and the control group received sham acupuncture (SA) treatment (n=36). The treatment was conducted within 15 min after the completion of the surgery and lasted for 30 min. The pain intensity was recorded by using the visual analog scale as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were verbal rating scale and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating. These measurements were evaluated at 11 time points: once every hour in the first 8 h after the treatment, 24 and 48 h after the treatment, and at the first defecation. Besides, quality of life was measured by Symptom Checklist-90 Scale at 24 and 48 h follow-ups.

Results

The EA group had significantly lower visual analog scale scores at the 3 time points of 6, 24 h, and during the defecation (p<0.05). Verbal rating scale showed a significantly lower score in the treatment group compared to the SA group at 4 h after the treatment as well as during defecation (p<0.05). The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating scores of EA group were significantly lower at 5, 7, and 8 h after treatment and during defecation (p<0.05) compared with those of SA group.

Conclusion

Acupuncture is effective in alleviating postoperative pain in patients who have undergone hemorrhoidectomy.

HAL-RAR (Doppler guided haemorrhoid artery ligation with recto-anal repair) is a safe and effective procedure for haemorrhoids. Results of a prospective study after two-years follow-up

PURPOSE

To analyse prospectively results of HAL-RAR technique by evaluating pain, perioperative complications and clinical outcome after two years followup.

METHODS

A prospective study design including 30 consecutive patients with haemorrhoids grade III-IV treated from June 2012. After discharge, patients received a specific questionnaire to record postoperative pain, delayed complications, evolution/disappearance of the symptoms that led to the surgical intervention (bleeding, prolapse, itching, pain and soiling). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain. Outpatient follow-up was carried out at 7 days, and 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Pre, intra and postoperative data (including physical examination) had been recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

The median operating time (range) was 40 (26-60) minutes. Average hospital stay (range) was 11 (3-25) hours. No postoperative complications were observed in 29 cases (96.6%). Median follow-up was 26 (12-36) months. All the patients attended the follow-up. Mean postoperative pain was VAS = 1.7 on the seventh day and it was practically non-existent (VAS = 0.7) 1 month after the procedure. 87.5% of patients confirmed complete relief of symptoms after 30 days and 93% of patients feel free of symptoms 6 months after the procedure. No patient has experienced late complications as dyschezia, urgency, soiling or faecal incontinence. After 24 months follow-up, recurrence of bleeding and prolapse was observed in only 1 patient; 93% of patients have considered results of HAL-RAR as very good or excellent.

CONCLUSION

HAL-RAR is safe and almost painless technique and it has very good results in the control of haemorrhoidal symptoms. This procedure should be considered as an effective first treatment option for haemorrhoids.

Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis

PURPOSE

The aims of this study are to review the advantages and drawbacks of the ambulatory management of patients scheduled for haemorrhoidal surgery and to highlight the reasons for unplanned hospital admission and suggest preventive strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature from January 1999 to January 2013 using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Manuscripts were specifically analysed for failure and side effects of haemorrhoidal surgery in ambulatory settings.

RESULTS

Fifty relevant studies (6082 patients) were retrieved from the literature review. The rate of ambulatory management failure ranged between 0 and 61%. The main reasons for failure were urinary retention, postoperative haemorrhage and unsatisfactory pain control. Spinal anaesthesia was associated with the highest rates of urinary retention. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation has less frequent side effects susceptible to impair ambulatory management than haemorrhoidectomy and stapled haemorrhoidopexy. However, the fact that haemorrhoidopexy is less painful than haemorrhoidectomy may allow ambulatory management.

CONCLUSION

Day-case haemorrhoidal surgery can be performed whatever the surgical procedure. Postoperative pain deserves special prevention measures after haemorrhoidectomy, especially by using perineal block or infiltrations. Urinary retention is a common issue that can be responsible for failure; it requires a preventive strategy including short duration spinal anaesthesia. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation is easy to perform in outpatients but deserves more complete evaluation in this setting.

Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a single surgeon experience

Background

There is an increasing, though still limited, amount of evidence describing the use of the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) device for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. This study assesses postoperative outcomes from a single surgeon experience with the THD device.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2011, 108 THD procedures were performed. With Doppler guidance, the THD device makes possible precise ligation of the branches of the superior hemorrhoidal artery. Patients were seen postoperatively at 3 weeks and 6 months. They underwent physical examination to determine whether there was recurrence of hemorrhoidal prolapse. They were asked to describe any bleeding, to rate pain using the visual analog scale, and to rate their level of satisfaction on a scale of 1–5 (with 5 = highly satisfied). A phone interview was used for follow-up at 1 year to determine the rate of recurrent prolapse.

Results

Of the 108 patients who underwent THD, two were lost to follow-up and excluded. All of the remaining 106 patients completed follow-up at 3 weeks and 6 months. At 3 weeks, 92 % of patients had no pain and 88 % were highly satisfied with the procedure at 3 weeks. This increased to 92 % satisfaction at 1 year. Prolapse recurrence was 7.5 % at 6 months and 10.3 % at 1 year. Bleeding was the most common complication, but did not require re-intervention or transfusion.

Conclusions

THD is a same-day procedure for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease that is safe and effective, and offers the potential for immediate return to normal activity.

A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

Few randomized trials have compared the results of Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy and excisional open hemorrhoidectomy. Few studies have reported long-term results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy compared with excisional open hemorrhoidectomy in patients with grade III hemorrhoids.

DESIGN

This is a prospective randomized study registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01263431). A power analysis assessed the study's sample size. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either hemorrhoidectomy or Doppler-guided hemorrhoid dearterialization plus mucopexy. The χ test, Mann-Whitney U test, Student t test, and a regression model were used, as appropriate.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at the Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

PATIENTS

Fifty consecutive patients were treated for grade III hemorrhoids from July to November 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was postoperative pain. The secondary outcomes included postoperative morbidity, the resumption of social and/or working activity, patient satisfaction, and the relapse of symptoms at 1 and 24 months.

RESULTS

No major complications occurred in either group. The median visual analog scale scores for pain in the hemorrhoidectomy and Doppler-guided dearterialization plus mucopexy groups on days 1, 7, 14, and 30 were 7 vs 5.5, 3 vs 2.5, 1 vs 0, and 0 vs 0 (p> 0.05). The median work resumption day was the 22nd in the hemorrhoidectomy group and the 10th in the Doppler-guided dearterialization plus mucopexy group (p = 0.09). Patient satisfaction at 1 and 24 postoperative months, with the use of a 4-point scale, was 3 vs 4 and 4 vs 4 (p > 0.05). During the follow-up, 2 patients in the dearterialization group required ambulatory treatment, and 1 patient in each group required further surgery for symptom relapse.

LIMITATIONS

Nonvalidated questionnaires were used in the follow-up. Cost analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSION

Compared with hemorrhoidectomy, dearterialization with mucopexy resulted in similar postoperative pain and morbidity, and a similar long-term cure rate.

Survey of patient satisfaction after Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization performed in ambulatory settings

BACKGROUND

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is a recently developed procedure to minimize postoperative pain from hemorrhoidectomy. This technique utilizes Doppler signals to aid ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries followed by mucopexy of redundant mucosa if needed. The aim of the present study was to assess patient satisfaction after THD.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent THD at three different sites from April 2007 through October 2010. All procedures were performed in ambulatory settings according to protocol. Telephone surveys were conducted after a minimum of 1-month follow-up to assess patients' satisfaction on a scale of 1-10. Patients were asked whether the procedure had alleviated their symptoms. Patients were asked to recall duration of pain and time from surgery to return to work.

RESULTS

Between April 2007 and October 2010, 216 patients with grade III-IV hemorrhoids underwent THD. There were 165 males and 61 females. Average age was 52.2 ± 14.2 years. All patients were discharged the same day after meeting ambulatory surgery center discharge criteria. Postoperative difficulty urinating occurred in 37 (17 %) patients, and six of them required temporary urinary catheterization. Transitory postoperative bleeding was reported by 38 (18 %) patients. Transitory incontinence to stool and flatus occurred in 18 (9 %) and 16 patients (8 %), respectively. Pelvic muscle spasms occurred in 21 (10 %) patients. Median follow-up was 23 months (range 1-42 months) with 143 (66 %) having at least 9 months between procedure and interview. Mean patient satisfaction was 8.5 ± 0.7 (on a scale of 1-10 with 10 being the best), and 91.5 % of patients felt the procedure had "helped" them. Average number of days with discomfort was 6.7 ± 2.1. Patients returned to work after an average of 10.3 ± 3.2 days. Our study is limited by lack of long-term follow-up and by retrospective complication assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction with THD performed in ambulatory settings is high. Our data support performance of this procedure in an ambulatory setting.

[Operations for hemorrhoids: indications and techniques]

Haemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common diseases in general and will in most cases progress without therapy. In the therapeutic context the means of choice are conservative therapies and in the advanced stage of the disease operative measures are necessary. In Germany 40,000-50,000 operations are performed each year. Our aim with the currently available various operation techniques is individualized therapy and indications. Thus a high healing rate, low complication rate and high patient satisfaction can be achieved.

Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review

AIM

Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHL) has experienced wider uptake and has recently received National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) approval in the UK. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to assess its safety and efficacy.

METHOD

This review was conducted in keeping with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies describing DGHL as a primary procedure and reporting clinical outcome were considered. Primary end-points were recurrence and postoperative pain. Secondary end-points included operation time, complications and reintervention rates. Studies were scored for quality with either Jadad score or NICE scoring guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies including 2904 patients were included in the final analysis. They were of poor overall quality. Recurrence ranged between 3% and 60% (pooled recurrence rate 17.5%), with the highest rates for grade IV haemorrhoids. Postoperative analgesia was required in 0-38% of patients. Overall postoperative complication rates were low, with an overall bleeding rate of 5% and an overall reintervention rate of 6.4%. The operation time ranged from 19 to 35 min.

CONCLUSION

DGHL is safe and efficacious with a low level of postoperative pain. It can be safely considered for primary treatment of grade II and III haemorrhoids.

DG-RAR for the treatment of symptomatic grade III and grade IV haemorrhoids: a 12-month multi-centre, prospective observational study

Background

Ultrasound-guided techniques represent a new treatment option in the treatment of haemorrhoids. Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) proved efficacious in early haemorrhoidal disease, but lacks efficacy for stages III/IV. For these patients, haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL) has been combined with a running suture to reduce prolapsing haemorrhoidal tissue (recto-anal repair (RAR)).

Methods

A prospective observational study was conducted in 184 patients with grade III (58 %) or grade IV (42 %) haemorrhoids in seven coloproctological centres. Primary endpoints were the recurrence of symptoms and need of further treatment (medical or surgical).

Results

Post-operative complications were seen in 8 % of patients. After a follow-up of 3 months, 91 % of patients were free of symptoms and 91 % of patients were satisfied with the result. After a follow-up of 12 months, 89 % of patients were free of symptoms and 88 % were satisfied with the result. Nineteen per cent of patients received further medical or surgical treatment.

Conclusions

Doppler-guided recto-anal repair (DG-RAR) proves to be an effective treatment option for the treatment of advanced haemorrhoidal disease that shows equal results to other established treatment options.

Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation with Recto-Anal-Repair modification: functional evaluation and safety assessment of a new minimally invasive method of treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease

Purpose: We present 12-month followup results of functional evaluation and safety assessment of a modification of hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) called Recto-Anal-Repair (RAR) in treatment of advanced hemorrhoidal disease (HD). Methods: Patients with grade III and IV HD underwent the RAR procedure (DGHAL combined with restoration of prolapsed hemorrhoids to their anatomical position with longitudinal sutures). Each patient had rectal examination, anorectal manometry, and QoL questionnaire performed before 3 months, and 12 months after RAR procedure. Results: 20 patients completed 12-month followup. There were no major complications. 3 months after RAR, 5 cases of residual mucosal prolapse were detected (25%), while only 3 patients (15%) reported persistence of symptoms. 12 months after RAR, another 3 HD recurrences were detected, to a total of 8 patients (40%) with HD recurrence. Anal pressures after RAR were significantly lower than before (P < 0.05), and the effect was persistent 12 months after RAR. One patient (5%) reported occasional soiling 3 months after RAR. Conclusions: RAR seems to be a safe method of treatment of advanced HD with no major complications. The procedure has a significant influence on anal pressures, with no evidence of risk of fecal incontinence after the operation.

Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation in patients with Crohn's disease

AIM

The outcome of Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) was assessed in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) suffering from grade III haemorrhoids.

METHOD

A retrospective study was carried out of patients with CD and symptomatic Grade III haemorrhoids treated by DGHAL. Perioperative and follow-up data were retrieved from our database of patients undergoing DGHAL.

RESULTS

The study included seven men and six women. The mean age was 34 years old. All had CD without anorectal involvement. The median duration of haemorrhoidal symptoms was 6.3 years. There was no mortality, new incontinence, faecal impaction, urinary retention, abscess formation or persistent pain following the procedure. Mean pain score based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) decreased from 2.4 at 24 h postoperatively to 1.6 on the seventh postoperative day. All patients had completely recovered by the third postoperative day. At 18 months, three (77%) of the patients were asymptomatic and three had recurrent symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation is safe and effective in treating Grade III haemorrhoids in patients with CD without rectal involvement.

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal vessels is being proposed as a treatment of grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids. Many researchers are coupling this procedure with mucopexy or lifting of hemorrhoids to control the prolapse more effectively. The present study was conducted in patients with 3rd-degree hemorrhoids to determine the usefulness of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation compared to mucopexy of prolapsing hemorrhoids and to compare it with mere mucopexy of the hemorrhoids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted on 48 consecutive patients with grade III hemorrhoids requiring surgery. The patients were randomized into two groups. Half of them were treated with ligation and mucopexy [SL], while the remaining patients underwent a Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation followed by ligation and mucopexy [DSL]. The patients were examined by a blinded independent observer at 2, 4, and 6 weeks and at the end of 1 year after the operation to evaluate postoperative pain scores, amount of analgesics consumed, and complications encountered. The observer also assessed recurrence of hemorrhoids after 1 year.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly longer in the DSL group (31 min vs. 9 min P < 0.003). The postoperative pain score was significantly higher in the Doppler group [4.4 vs. 2.2, P < 0.002 (visual analogue scale)]. The mean total analgesic dose and duration of pain control using analgesics were greater and longer for the Doppler group than for the SL group (17 vs. 11 tablets, and 13 days vs. 9 days, respectively; P < 0. 01). Complications were similar in both the groups. At 1-year follow-up, the recurrence of hemorrhoids was not statistically significant in either group (4 patients in SL group and 3 patients in DSL group; P < 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Suture ligation of hemorrhoids is a simple, cost-effective, and convenient modality for treating grade 3 hemorrhoids. Doppler assistance in ligating the hemorrhoidal vessels prior to hemorrhoidal mucopexy offers no advantage and is a time-consuming procedure.