Familial pancreatic cancer--status quo

Surgical management of familial pancreatic cancer: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality. The fact that the vast majority of patients with PDAC are diagnosed at an advanced stage highlights the need of early diagnosis. As hereditary factors are associated with approximately 5% of all PDAC cases, a screening programme to these high-risk individuals (HRI) has been proposed. The aim of screening methods is to identify selected group of patients with morphological abnormalities at an early stage, in order to be treated promptly. In this study, we evaluate the surgical outcomes and the appropriateness of pancreatic resection in HRIs who were selected for screening.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. The clinicopathological features were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Six studies were selected for data collection. A total number of 77 patients were identified. Twenty-one patients had a germline mutation, with CDKN2A being the most prominent one (15.6%). Distal pancreatectomy was the most common surgical procedure (42.8%), followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy (33.8%). The mean disease-free survival was 23.6 months and tumour recurrence occurred in 9 patients (11.7%). Disease-specific mortality was 17.8%, while overall mortality was 19.5%. The most frequently reported postoperative diagnosis was PDAC (28 cases, 38.9%), followed by IPMN (23 cases, 31.9%), whereas high-grade PanIN lesions were found in 13 patients (18.1%).

CONCLUSION

High-risk individuals for pancreatic cancer, who are eventually operated may have a relatively uneventful postoperative course, however the oncological outcomes are comparable to the general population.

Study protocol for a multi-institutional prospective surveillance study among kindreds with familial pancreatic cancer and individuals with hereditary pancreatic cancer syndrome: The Diamond Study

BACKGROUND

Family history of pancreatic cancer (PC) and some hereditary cancer syndromes are risk factors for PC. Previous studies suggest that conducting surveillance for kindreds at high risk for familial PC may be useful for diagnoses at the stage where resections can still be implemented; however, there is insufficient evidence linking surveillance and increased rates of resectable PC.

METHODS

We launched a surveillance study for kindreds with familial PC and individuals with hereditary PC syndrome, titled the "Diamond Study," in June 2020. This Japanese national multi-institutional prospective intervention study has been initiated to conduct evaluations within a prospective clinical trial format.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint is the fraction of patients with resectable PC among patients with PC found through surveillance interventions. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging combined with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography will be performed alternatively every 6 months for up to 15 years, with 400 as the predicted number of registered participants and a predicted registration period of 10 years.

CONCLUSION

We intend to scientifically prove the usefulness of surveillance for kindreds with familial PC and individuals with hereditary PC syndrome to improve PC prognoses.

Combinations of Low-Frequency Genetic Variants Might Predispose to Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is an established but rare inherited tumor syndrome that accounts for approximately 5% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases. No major causative gene defect has yet been identified, but germline mutations in predisposition genes BRCA1/2, CDKN2A and PALB2 could be detected in 10–15% of analyzed families. Thus, the genetic basis of disease susceptibility in the majority of FPC families remains unknown. In an attempt to identify new candidate genes, we performed whole-genome sequencing on affected patients from 15 FPC families, without detecting BRCA1/2, CDKN2A or PALB2 mutations, using an Illumina based platform. Annotations from CADD, PolyPhen-2, SIFT, Mutation Taster and PROVEAN were used to assess the potential impact of a variant on the function of a gene. Variants that did not segregate with pancreatic disease in respective families were excluded. Potential predisposing candidate genes ATM, SUFU, DAB1, POLQ, FGFBP3, MAP3K3 and ACAD9 were identified in 7 of 15 families. All identified gene mutations segregated with pancreatic disease, but sometimes with incomplete penetrance. An analysis of up to 46 additional FPC families revealed that the identified gene mutations appeared to be unique in most cases, despite a potentially deleterious ACAD9 Ala326Thr germline variant, which occurred in 4 (8.7%) of 46 FPC families. Notably, affected PDAC patients within a family carried identical germline mutations in up to three different genes, e.g., DAB1, POLQ and FGFBP3. These results support the hypothesis that FPC is a highly heterogeneous polygenetic disease caused by low-frequency or rare variants.

Pancreatic FDG uptake on follow-up PET/CT in patients with cancer

To evaluate the breakdown of unexpected pancreatic ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and the proportion of secondary primary pancreatic cancer on follow-up, patients with cancer underwent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). The participants consisted of 4,473 consecutive patients with cancer who underwent follow-up PET/CT between January 2015 and March 2019 at Kochi Medical School. Among the participants, 225 with a history of pancreatic cancer were excluded from the present study. Retrospective and blinded PET/CT evaluations of 4,248 patients were performed. In patients with pancreatic FDG uptake, the distribution of FDG uptake in the pancreas was evaluated. The final diagnosis was determined pathologically. A total of 14 (0.3%) of the 4,248 patients exhibited FDG uptake in the pancreatic area. Pancreatic abnormalities were detected in 14 patients, and included five cases of pancreatic metastases (36%), four cases of secondary primary pancreatic cancer (29%), two cases of lymph node metastases (14%), one case of malignant lymphoma (7%), one case of autoimmune pancreatitis (7%) and one case of pseudolesion (7%). One patient with early-stage secondary primary pancreatic cancer had a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) <3.0. The remaining 13 patients had a SUV_max >3.0 in the pancreas. Of the 14 patients, two had multiple foci of FDG uptake in the pancreas. Patients with multiple foci of FDG uptake exhibited pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma and malignant lymphoma. In conclusion, the majority of patients with unexpected pancreatic FDG uptake on follow-up PET/CT exhibited malignancies; furthermore, ~30% of the malignancies detected in patients with pancreatic FDG uptake were secondary primary pancreatic cancers. In patients with unexpected pancreatic FDG uptake on follow-up PET/CT, primary cancer should be considered as well as metastatic tumors.

Tumour-Agnostic Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer and Biliary Tract Cancer

The prognosis of patients with solid tumours has remarkably improved with the development of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the improvements in the prognosis of pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer is delayed compared to other carcinomas, and the 5-year survival rates of distal-stage disease are approximately 10 and 20%, respectively. However, a comprehensive analysis of tumour cells using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project has led to the identification of various driver mutations. Evidently, few mutations exist across organs, and basket trials targeting driver mutations regardless of the primary organ are being actively conducted. Such basket trials not only focus on the gate keeper-type oncogene mutations, such as HER2 and BRAF, but also focus on the caretaker-type tumour suppressor genes, such as BRCA1/2, mismatch repair-related genes, which cause hereditary cancer syndrome. As oncogene panel testing is a vital approach in routine practice, clinicians should devise a strategy for improved understanding of the cancer genome. Here, the gene mutation profiles of pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer have been outlined and the current status of tumour-agnostic therapy in these cancers has been reported.

Characteristics of early-onset pancreatic cancer and its association with familial pancreatic cancer and hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes

The incidence of pancreatic cancer is high among those in their sixties to seventies but low in those in their fifties or younger. Although there is no unified definition regarding the age of early-onset pancreatic cancer, previously published reports suggest that, compared to later-onset pancreatic cancer patients, early-onset pancreatic cancer patients tend to be detected at advanced stages and thus have poor prognoses, but they do not show significantly higher rates of patients with genetic factors. On the other hand, it has been reported that patients with familial pancreatic cancer and hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes often develop pancreatic cancer at a young age. The broad definition of familial pancreatic cancer is pancreatic cancer in patients who have two or more first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer; whereas the narrow definition of familial pancreatic cancer is the broad definition of familial pancreatic cancer, while excluding those with inherited tumor syndromes. Hereditary tumors developing pancreatic cancer include hereditary pancreatitis, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, all of which are autosomal dominant hereditary diseases. This study reviews the clinical characteristics of early-onset pancreatic cancer and its association with familial pancreatic cancer and hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes.

Are BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation patients underscreened for pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BRCA) mutations account for the highest proportion of hereditary causes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Screening is currently recommended only for patients with one first-degree relative or two family members with PDAC. We hypothesized that screening all BRCA1/2 patients would identify a higher rate of pancreatic abnormalities.

METHODS

All BRCA1/2 patients at a single academic center were retrospectively reviewed (2005-2015). Pancreatic abnormalities were defined on cross-sectional imaging as pancreatic neoplasm (cystic/solid) or main-duct dilation.

RESULTS

Two hundred and four patients were identified with BRCA mutations. Forty-seven (40%) had abdominal imaging (20 computerized tomography and 27 magnetic resonance imaging). Twenty-one percent had pancreatic abnormalities (PDAC [n = 2] and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm [IPMN; n = 8]). The prevalence of pancreatic abnormalities and IPMN was higher in BRCA2 patients than in the general population (21% vs 8% and 17% vs 1%; P = 0.0007 and P < 0.0001, respectively), with no influence of family history. Similarly, BRCA1 patients had an increased prevalence of IPMN (8.3% vs 1%; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, 4% and 17% of BRCA2 patients developed PDAC and IPMN, respectively. Eight percent of BRCA1 patients developed IPMN. Under current recommended screening, 60% of BRCA1/2 patients had incompletely pancreatic assessment. With no influence of family history, this study suggests all BRCA1/2 patients should undergo a high-risk screening protocol that will identify a higher rate of precancerous pancreatic neoplasms amenable to curative resection.

German National Case Collection for familial pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa) - acceptance and psychological aspects of a pancreatic cancer screening program

Background

Pancreatic cancer screening is recommended to individuals at risk (IAR) of familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families, but little is known about the acceptance of such screening programs. Thus, the acceptance and psychological aspects of a controlled FPC screening program was evaluated.

Methods

IAR of FPC families underwent comprehensive counseling by a geneticist and pancreatologist prior to the proposed screening. Participating IAR, IAR who discontinued screening and IAR who never participated in the screening program were invited to complete questionnaires to assess the motivation for participating in surveillance, cancer worries, structural distress and experiences with participation. Questionnaires were completed anonymously to receive most accurate answers.

Results

Of 286 IAR to whom pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) screening was recommended, 139 (48.6%) IAR regularly participated (group 1), 49 (17.1%) IAR (group 2) discontinued screening after median 1 (1–10) screening visits and 98 (34.2%) IAR (group 3) never underwent screening. The overall response rate of questionnaires was 67% (189/286) with rates of 100% (139 of 139 IAR), 49% (29 of 49 IAR) and 23.4% (23 of 98 IAR) for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At least 93% of IAR felt adequately informed about the screening program after initial counseling. However, only 38.8% received knowledge of or the recommendation for PDAC screening by physicians. The reported cancer-related distress and the fear of investigations were highest in group 1, but acceptably low in all three groups. The main reasons to discontinue or not to participate in screening were the time efforts and travel costs (groups 2 and 3 48,7%).

Conclusion

Less than 50% of IAR regularly participate in a proposed PDAC screening program, although the associated psychological burden is quite low. Physicians should be educated about high risk PDAC groups and screening recommendations. Time and travel efforts must be reduced to encourage more IAR to participate in a recommended screening.

Familial Pancreatic Cancer

Familial pancreatic cancer accounts for 10% of all patients with pancreatic cancer. Because the 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer is only 7%, screening programs for high-risk individuals are essential and might be advantageous. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma mostly shows symptoms at an advanced state and treatment is not efficient enough to cure most patients. People with hereditary tumor syndromes or their affected relatives can also be included in such screening programs. Besides the collection of data to investigate the background of the disease, these screening programs aim to diagnose and treat precursor lesions so that more dangerous, invasive lesions are prevented. These precursor lesions can be pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, and mucinous cystic neoplasm. This review summarizes the latest knowledge of pancreatic screening programs, shows the procedure of pancreatic cancer screening, and gives an overview of current guidelines.

Germline Variants and Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Emerging Concepts

Pancreatic cancer requires many genetic mutations. Combinations of underlying germline variants and environmental factors may increase the risk of cancer and accelerate the oncogenic process. We systematically reviewed, annotated, and classified previously reported pancreatic cancer-associated germline variants in established risk genes. Variants were scored using multiple criteria and binned by evidence for pathogenicity, then annotated with published functional studies and associated biological systems/pathways. Twenty-two previously identified pancreatic cancer risk genes and 337 germline variants were identified from 97 informative studies that met our inclusion criteria. Fifteen of these genes contained 66 variants predicted to be pathogenic (APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, CFTR, CHEK2, MLH1, MSH2, NBN, PALB2, PALLD, PRSS1, SPINK1, TP53). Pancreatic cancer risk genes were organized into key biological mechanisms that promote pancreatic oncogenesis within an oncogenic model. Development of precision medicine approaches requires updated variant information within the framework of an oncogenic progression model. Complex risk modeling may improve interpretation of early biomarkers and guide pathway-specific treatment for pancreatic cancer in the future. Precision medicine is within reach.

Familial pancreatic cancer

Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) includes those kindreds that contain at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. At least 12 known hereditary syndromes or genes are associated with increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer, the foremost being BRCA2 and CDKN2A. Research into the identification of mutations in known cancer predisposition genes and through next-generation sequencing has revealed extensive heterogeneity. The development of genetic panel testing has enabled genetic risk assessment and predisposition testing to be routinely offered. Precision oncology has opened the possibility of "incidental" germline mutations that may have implications for family members. However, in both cases, evidence-based recommendations for managing patients and at-risk family members in light of genetic status remain emergent, with current practice based on expert opinion.

[Hereditary gastric and pancreatic cancer predisposition syndromes]

The most common hereditary gastrointestinal cancers are colorectal, mainly hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and familial adenomatous polyposis. Other extracolonic neoplasms, including the gastric and pancreatic adenocarcinomas, are less well known and studied because they account for a relatively small percentage of hereditary gastrointestinal cancers. Nonetheless, they merit special attention because of the high associated morbidity and mortality rates. We review the hereditary and familial syndromes associated with gastric and pancreatic cancers with a view to improving knowledge and understanding of these diseases, in order to heighten diagnostic suspicion and thus implement appropriate diagnostic strategies, screening, surveillance and treatment.

Familial Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) kindreds have at least 2 first-degree relatives with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Studies of FPC have focused on the discovery of genetic cause and on the management of those at genetically high risk. Research reveals that a half dozen known hereditary syndromes or genes are associated with increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer, the most prominent of which are BRCA2 and CDKN2A. Genetic risk assessment and testing is already available. Owing to limited experience worldwide, guidance is often based on expert opinion, although all agree that research is needed to improve the shaping of options.

[Multimodal treatment of pancreatic cancer]

Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas is one of the most aggressive types of solid tumor and stands at fourth position in the tumor death frequency scale due to a high mortality rate. Effective screening methods are not available and only radical surgery offers a curative option. With adjuvant chemotherapy the median survival time can be prolonged up to 23 months and approximately 25 % of patients are still alive after 5 years. Of these patients approximately 75-80 % are already in a palliative therapy situation at the time of diagnosis. In the last 5 years treatment options have been increased by the introduction of new chemotherapeutic drugs. For patients with metastasized disease median survival times of 6-12 months can currently be achieved depending on the general performance status at diagnosis but less than 5 % of these patients are still alive after 5 years. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies, radiation and immunotherapy do not play a role in evidence-based clinical practice. Despite progress in the understanding of cancer biology and new treatment options, non-resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas remains a disease with a very poor prognosis.