Iron deficiency and short-term adverse events in patients with decompensated heart failure

Exercise training response according to baseline ferrokinetics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A substudy of the TRAINING-HF trial

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency (ID) is associated with impaired functional capacity in patients with heart failure (HF), even in those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of baseline ferrokinetics on peak oxygen consumption (peakVO2) improvement after a 12-week physical therapy programme in patients with stable HFpEF.

METHODS

This study is a post-hoc sub-analysis of a randomized clinical trial in which 59 stable patients with HFpEF were randomized to receive a 12-week programme of inspiratory muscle training (IMT), functional electrical stimulation (FES), IMT + FES or usual care (UC) to evaluate change in peakVO2 (NCT02638961). Serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) determinations were assessed at baseline. ID was defined as ferritin <100 ng/mL and/or TSAT <20% if ferritin was within 100-299 ng/mL. We used a linear mixed regression model to analyse between-treatment changes in peakVO2 across ferrokinetics status at 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean age was 74 ± 9 years, and 36 (61%) had ID. The mean of peakVO2 was 9.9 ± 2.5 mL/kg/min. The median of ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT) was 91 (50-181) ng/mL and 23% (16-30), respectively. A total of 52 patients completed the trial (13 patients per arm). Compared with those patients on UC, patients allocated to any of the active arms showed less improvement in peak VO2 when they showed ID (P-value for interaction <0.001), lower values of ferritin (P-value for interaction <0.001), or TSAT (P-value for interaction <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ferrokinetics status plays an essential role in modifying the aerobic capacity response to physical therapies in patients with HFpEF. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Iron deficiency and supplementation in heart failure

Non-anaemic iron deficiency (NAID) is a strategic target in cardiovascular medicine because of its association with a range of adverse effects in various conditions. Endeavours to tackle NAID in heart failure have yielded mixed results, exposing knowledge gaps in how best to define 'iron deficiency' and the handling of iron therapies by the body. To address these gaps, we harness the latest understanding of the mechanisms of iron homeostasis outside the erythron and integrate clinical and preclinical lines of evidence. The emerging picture is that current definitions of iron deficiency do not assimilate the multiple influences at play in patients with heart failure and, consequently, fail to identify those with a truly unmet need for iron. Additionally, current iron supplementation therapies benefit only certain patients with heart failure, reflecting differences in the nature of the unmet need for iron and the modifying effects of anaemia and inflammation on the handling of iron therapies by the body. Building on these insights, we identify untapped opportunities in the management of NAID, including the refinement of current approaches and the development of novel strategies. Lessons learned from NAID in cardiovascular disease could ultimately translate into benefits for patients with other chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer.

Markers of Iron Metabolism and Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

Iron deficiency (ID) in conjunction with heart failure (HF) poses a challenge for clinicians and is associated with worse HF outcomes. Treatment of ID with IV iron supplementation for patients with HF has demonstrated benefits in quality of life (QoL) and HF-related hospitalizations. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence linking iron metabolism biomarkers with outcomes in patients with HF to assist in the optimal use of these biomarkers for patient selection. A systematic review of observational studies in English from 2010 to 2022 was conducted using PubMed, with keywords of “Heart Failure” and respective iron metabolism biomarkers (“Ferritin”, “Hepcidin”, “TSAT”, “Serum Iron”, and “Soluble Transferrin Receptor”). Studies pertaining to HF patients, with available quantitative data on serum iron metabolism biomarkers, and report of specific outcomes (mortality, hospitalization rates, functional capacity, QoL, and cardiovascular events) were included, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or other HF characteristics. Clinical trials of iron supplementation and anemia treatment were removed. This systematic review was conducive to formal assessment of risk of bias via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were synthesized based on their respective adverse outcomes and iron metabolism biomarker(s). Initial and updated searches identified 508 unique titles once duplicates were removed. The final analysis included 26 studies: 58% focused on reduced LVEF; age range was 53–79 years; males composed 41–100% of the reported population. Statistically significant associations of ID were observed with all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization rates, functional capacity, and QoL. Increased risk for cerebrovascular events and acute renal injury have also been reported, but these findings were not consistent. Varying definitions of ID were utilized among the studies; however, most studies employed the current European Society of Cardiology criteria: serum ferritin < 100 ng/mL or the combination of ferritin between 100–299 ng/mL and transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 20%. Despite several iron metabolism biomarkers demonstrating strong association with several outcomes, TSAT better predicted all-cause mortality, as well as long-term risk for HF hospitalizations. Low ferritin was associated with short-term risk for HF hospitalizations, worsening functional capacity, poor QoL, and development of acute renal injury in acute HF. Elevated soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) levels were associated with worse functional capacity and QoL. Finally, low serum iron was significantly associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events. Considering the lack of consistency among the iron metabolism biomarkers for association with adverse outcomes, it is important to incorporate additional biomarker data, beyond ferritin and TSAT, when assessing for ID in HF patients. These inconsistent associations question how best to define ID to ensure proper treatment. Further research, potentially tailored to specific HF phenotypes, is required to optimize patient selection for iron supplementation therapy and appropriate targets for iron stores replenishment.

Iron deficiency screening is a key issue in chronic inflammatory diseases: A call to action

Iron deficiency is frequent in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions (e.g., chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, cancers, and bowel inflammatory diseases). Indeed, high concentrations of inflammatory cytokines increase hepcidin concentrations that lead to the sequestration of iron in cells of the reticuloendothelial system (functional iron deficiency). Iron parameters are often assessed only in the context of anemia, but iron deficiency, even without anemia, is present in about half of patients with inflammatory conditions. Iron deficiency worsens underlying chronic diseases and is an independent factor of morbidity and mortality. In daily practice, the most effective biomarkers of iron status are serum ferritin, which reflects iron storage, and transferrin saturation, which reflects the transport of iron. Serum ferritin is increased in an inflammatory context, and there is still no consensus on the threshold to be used in chronic inflammatory conditions. Nevertheless, recent recommendations of international guidelines agreed to define iron deficiency by serum ferritin &lt;100 µg/L and/or transferrin saturation &lt;20%. Iron parameters remain, however, insufficiently assessed in patients with chronic inflammatory conditions. Indeed, clinical symptoms of iron deficiency, such as fatigue, are not specific and often confused with those of the primary disease. Iron repletion, preferably by the intravenous route to bypass tissue sequestration, improves clinical signs and quality of life. Because of the negative impact of iron deficiency on chronic inflammatory diseases and the efficacy of intravenous iron repletion, screening of iron parameters should be part of the routine examination of all patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.

Neglected Comorbidity of Chronic Heart Failure: Iron Deficiency

Iron deficiency is a significant comorbidity of heart failure (HF), defined as the inability of the myocardium to provide sufficient blood flow. However, iron deficiency remains insufficiently detected. Iron-deficiency anemia, defined as a decrease in hemoglobin caused by iron deficiency, is a late consequence of iron deficiency, and the symptoms of iron deficiency, which are not specific, are often confused with those of HF or comorbidities. HF patients with iron deficiency are often rehospitalized and present reduced survival. The correction of iron deficiency in HF patients is associated with improved functional capacity, quality of life, and rehospitalization rates. Because of the inflammation associated with chronic HF, which complicates the picture of nutritional deficiency, only the parenteral route can bypass the tissue sequestration of iron and the inhibition of intestinal iron absorption. Given the negative impact of iron deficiency on HF progression, the frequency and financial implications of rehospitalizations due to decompensation episodes, and the efficacy of this supplementation, screening for this frequent comorbidity should be part of routine testing in all HF patients. Indeed, recent European guidelines recommend screening for iron deficiency (serum ferritin and transferrin saturation coefficient) in all patients with suspected HF, regular iron parameters assessment in all patients with HF, and intravenous iron supplementation in symptomatic patients with proven deficiency. We thus aim to summarize all currently available data regarding this common and easily improvable comorbidity.

Incidence, Treatment and Clinical Impact of Iron Deficiency in Chronic Heart Failure: A Longitudinal Analysis

In patients with heart failure (HF), iron deficiency (ID) is a well-recognized therapeutic target; information about its incidence, patterns of iron repletion, and clinical impact is scarce. This single-centre longitudinal cohort study assessed the rates of ID testing and diagnosis in patients with stable HF, patterns of treatment with intravenous iron, and clinical impact of intravenous iron on HF rehospitalization risk. We included 711 consecutive outpatients (4400 visits) with stable chronic HF from 2014 to 2019 (median [interquartile range] visits per patient: 2 [2−7]. ID was defined as serum ferritin <100 µg/L, or 100−299 µg/L with transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 20%. During a median follow-up of 2.20 (1.11−3.78) years, ferritin and TSAT were measured at 2230 (50.7%) and 2183 visits (49.6%), respectively. ID was found at 846 (37.9%) visits, with ferritin and TSAT available (2230/4400), and intravenous iron was administered at 321/4400 (7.3%) visits; 233 (32.8%) patients received intravenous iron during follow-up. After multivariate analyses, iron repletion at any time during follow-up was associated with a lower risk of recurrent HF hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28−0.88; p = 0.016). Thus, ID was a frequent finding in patients with HF, and its repletion reduced the risk of recurrent HF hospitalizations.

Iron Deficiency in Heart Failure: Mechanisms and Pathophysiology

Iron is an essential micronutrient for a myriad of physiological processes in the body beyond erythropoiesis. Iron deficiency (ID) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF), with a prevalence reaching up to 59% even in non-anaemic patients. ID impairs exercise capacity, reduces the quality of life, increases hospitalisation rate and mortality risk regardless of anaemia. Intravenously correcting ID has emerged as a promising treatment in HF as it has been shown to alleviate symptoms, improve quality of life and exercise capacity and reduce hospitalisations. However, the pathophysiology of ID in HF remains poorly characterised. Recognition of ID in HF triggered more research with the aim to explain how correcting ID improves HF status as well as the underlying causes of ID in the first place. In the past few years, significant progress has been made in understanding iron homeostasis by characterising the role of the iron-regulating hormone hepcidin, the effects of ID on skeletal and cardiac myocytes, kidneys and the immune system. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge and recent advances in the pathophysiology of ID in heart failure, the deleterious systemic and cellular consequences of ID.

Iron deficiency testing and treatment in heart failure: the eyes are useless when the mind is blind

Definition, clinical implications, and rate of iron deficiency assessment and treatment in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; HF, heart failue; ID, iron deficiency; TSAT, transferrin sauration.