[Short- and long-term effects of intensified versus conventional antilipidemic therapy in patients with coronary heart disease. Results from the Lipid-Coronary Artery Disease (L-CAD) Study]

Influence of preoperative lipid-lowering therapy on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Statin therapy has recently been shown to decrease adverse perioperative events in patients undergoing vascular surgery. The potential beneficial effect of lipid-lowering therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is not well known. This was an observational analysis of 4,739 patients who underwent first-time isolated CABG at a single institution from 1995 to 2001. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on treatment with a lipid-lowering agent within 30 days before surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the association between lipid-lowering therapy and survival to hospital discharge. Patients in the lipid-lowering group (n = 2,334) tended to be younger (mean age 66 +/- 10 vs 68 +/- 10 years), were more likely to be diabetic (31% vs 28%), and on beta blockers (77% vs 70%) than patients in the nonlipid-lowering group (n = 2,405). In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the lipid-lowering group than in the nonlipid-lowering therapy group (1.4% vs 2.2%, odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.96, p = 0.03). A multivariable model demonstrated a loss of statistical significance for the effect of lipid-lowering therapy on in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.37, p = 0.46). In conclusion, preoperative use of lipid-lowering therapy in patients undergoing CABG appears safe and is associated with improved survival to hospital discharge compared with patients not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. However, patient risk factors and other cardioprotective medication use associated with the use of preoperative lipid-lowering therapy appear to explain the association with improved survival.

Reduced risks of death and CHF are associated with statin therapy administered acutely within the first 24 h of AMI

BACKGROUND

Reports have demonstrated an association between statin therapy during the first day of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and reduced mortality. There are little data about whether early statin therapy reduces risk of CHF and alters timing of death.

METHODS

We identified 3226 consecutive patients with AMI from 1993 through 2000 and divided them into early statin therapy (statins were administered within the initial 24 h of hospitalization, n=220) and non-statin therapy groups (n=3006). We compared mortality risks, rates of CHF development and measures of peak CK and CK-MB values between the groups.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was lower in the early statin therapy group (2.7%) compared to the non-statin therapy group (9.2%), p=0.001. We observed no differences in the median time to death (statin group 132 h vs. non-statin group 72 h), p=0.3. Patients with very early statin treatment had lower peak CK (624 ng/ml) and CK-MB (46 ng/ml) values compared to non-statin patients (848 ng/ml and 84 ng/ml), p<0.01. Patients in the early statin group had lower risks of developing CHF during hospitalization (10.2 %) compared to the non-statin group (25.7%), p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Very early administration of statin therapy during the first day of hospitalization for AMI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality, lower rates of developing CHF and reduced peak biomarker release. These data support a benefit from early statin therapy in AMI and support the need for prospective studies which test whether very early statin therapy might also reduce infarct size.

A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes in Spain

To determine the 16-week health economic outcomes of short-term, intensive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using unit costs from Spain. The total expected cost per patient and the cost per inpatient event avoided were compared for patients on atorvastatin 80 mg daily versus placebo. The analysis was based on clinical outcome data from the MIRACL study. Clinical outcomes measured in this analysis included: death, cardiac arrest, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal MI, angina pectoris, stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF), and surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularizations. Unit costs for outcomes were values using 2001 Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) costs in Spain. The cost of a follow-up visit was added to the cost of each outcome in both groups. In the atorvastatin group, monitoring costs were also added. All direct medical costs were taken from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System during a 16-week period. The hospital cost in the atorvastatin group was <euro> 1,921 per patient, compared to <euro> 1,853 in the placebo group. The incremental cost per patient in the atorvastatin group was <euro> 67.47, corresponding to a cost per inpatient event avoided of <euro> 1,760. The cost of atorvastatin for 16 weeks was <euro> 128. Forty-seven percent of this cost of atorvastatin was offset by the cost savings obtained through the reduction of number of events in the atorvastatin group. In Spain, the intensive short-term use of atorvastatin in patients with ACS has a favorable cost-effectiveness. The direct cost of the drug was largely offset by the associated reduction in costs for treating fewer cardiovascular events.

Statin lipid-lowering therapy for acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: efficacy and mechanism of benefit

The use of statin agents in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) remains an area of intense clinical interest. Statin therapy has an established secondary preventive benefit in patients with coronary artery disease, and its extension to ACS seems logical. A number of observational studies have shown an association between initiation of statin therapy early in ACS and improved clinical outcome. Additionally, 4 randomized controlled trials have examined the use of statin therapy for ACS: the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) study, the Pravastatin Turkish Trial, the Fluvastatin on Risk Diminishing After Acute Myocardial Infarction (FLORIDA) study, and the Lipid-Coronary Artery Disease (L-CAD) study. Three of these trials showed a benefit with early initiation of statin therapy, whereas 1 trial demonstrated neither benefit nor harm. All the available trials lacked the power and design to sufficiently evaluate whether early initiation of statin therapy reduces mortality and reinfarction in patients with ACS. Four ongoing trials have been designed and sufficiently powered to determine whether statin therapy reduces the risk of death and reinfarction when initiated early in ACS treatment. A body of evidence suggests that the pleiotropic actions of statin agents might modulate benefit in ACS. This article summarizes the available data and provides a rationale for early initiation of statin therapy for patients with ACS.

Effectiveness of statins in acute coronary syndromes

Over the past several years, results of clinical trials of lipid lowering have increased our understanding of the pathophysiology of coronary atherosclerosis and ischemia. Evidence is accumulating that cholesterol lowering has potential anti-ischemic effects and may have immediate consequences that have a favorable impact on coronary events, possibly even acute coronary syndromes. Yet, less than one half of all patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes have their cardiovascular risks appropriately modified. The results of recent statin trials provide impetus for the implementation of aggressive risk-reduction strategies in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, including those with recent acute coronary syndromes. Prevention is now a viable therapeutic goal.