Radiation exposure to the hands of orthopaedic surgeons: are we underestimating the risk?

Factors associated with increased radiation exposure in the fixation of proximal femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

When using radiation intraoperatively, a surgeon should aim to keep the radiation dose as low as is reasonably achievable to obtain the therapeutic goal. We aimed to investigate factors associated with increased radiation exposure in fixation of proximal femur fractures.

METHODS

We assessed 369 neck of femur fractures over a 1-year period in a district general hospital. All hip fracture subtypes that had undergone surgical fixation were included. We assessed the relationship between type of fracture, implants used and surgeon level of experience with the dose-area product (DAP; cGy/cm2) and screening time (dS). We also looked at the quality of reduction and fixation and its effect on the radiation exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients were included in our analysis; 185 patients who were treated with hip arthroplasty were excluded. There was a significant association between higher DAP and fracture subtype (p = 0.001), fracture complexity (p < 0.001), if an additional implant was used (p = 0.001), if fixation was satisfactory (p = 0.002) and operative time (p < 0.001). DAP was higher with a proximal femoral nail than with a dynamic hip screw, especially when a long nail was used. There was some evidence of an association between the surgeon's level of experience and DAP exposure, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.069).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased radiation in proximal femur fractures is seen in the fixation of complex fractures, some subtypes, with certain types of implants used and if an additional implant was required. Surgeon seniority did not result in less radiation exposure, which is in contrast to other published studies.

A clinical study on robot navigationassisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures and compare it's efficacy with that of traditional surgical intramedullary nail treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with humeral shaft fractures who received intramedullary nail treatment at our centre from March 2020 to September 2022. The analysis was divided into a robot group and a traditional surgical group on the basis of whether the surgery involved a robot navigation system. We compared the baseline data (age, sex, cause of injury, fracture AO classification, and time of injury-induced surgery), intraoperative conditions (surgery time, length of main nail insertion incision, postoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative bleeding), fracture healing time, and shoulder joint function at 1 year postsurgery (ASES score and Constant-Murley score) between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data or average fracture healing time between the two groups of patients. However, the robotic group had significantly shorter surgical times, longer main nail incisions, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies, and less intraoperative blood loss than did the traditional surgery group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures is a reasonable and effective surgical plan. It can help surgeons determine the insertion point and proximal opening direction faster and more easily, shorten the surgical time, reduce bleeding, avoid more intraoperative fluoroscopy, and enable patients to achieve better shoulder functional outcomes.

Use of the flat panel detector fluoroscope reduces radiation exposure during periacetabular osteotomy

The Periacetabular Osteotomy is a technically demanding procedure that requires precise intraoperative evaluation of pelvic anatomy. Fluoroscopic images pose a radiation risk to operating room staff, scrubbed personnel, and the patient. Most commonly, a Standard Fluoroscope with an Image Intensifier is used. Our institution recently implemented the novel Fluoroscope with a Flat Panel Detector. The purpose of this study was to compare radiation dosage and accuracy between the two fluoroscopes. A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients who underwent Periacetabular Osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia was completed. The total radiation exposure dose (mGy) was recorded and compared for each case from the standard fluoroscope (n = 27) and the flat panel detector (n = 26) cohorts. Lateral center edge angle was measured and compared intraoperatively and at the six-week postoperative visit. A total of 53 patients (96% female) with a mean age and BMI of 17.84 (± 6.84) years and 22.66 (± 4.49) kg/m2 (standard fluoroscope) and 18.23 (± 4.21) years and 21.99 (± 4.00) kg/m2 (flat panel detector) were included. The standard fluoroscope averaged total radiation exposure to be 410.61(± 193.02) mGy, while the flat panel detector averaged 91.12 (± 49.64) mGy (p < 0.0001). The average difference (bias) between intraoperative and 6-week postoperative lateral center edge angle measurement was 0.36° (limits of agreement: - 3.19 to 2.47°) for the standard fluoroscope and 0.27° (limits of agreement: - 2.05 to 2.59°) for the flat panel detector cohort. Use of fluoroscopy with flat panel detector technology decreased the total radiation dose exposure intraoperatively and produced an equivalent assessment of intraoperative lateral center edge angle. Decreasing radiation exposure to young patients is imperative to reduce the risk of future comorbidities.

Does radiation exposure during pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture surgery change according to the C-arm position? A comparison of two different techniques

INTRODUCTION

In the surgical treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures (SHF), the surgeon has to stand right next to the fluoroscopy device, so it is very important to know how to use it in the most appropriate way to reduce radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using C-arm in uniplanar (inverted) and biplanar (standard-horizontal) configurations on (1) the radiation exposure to the surgeon, and (2) surgical time and fluoroscopy exposure time.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective randomised study was conducted on 20 patients who underwent fluoroscopy during closed reduction and percutaneous pinning for a SHF. In the first configuration, the C-arm was inverted and the image intensifier was used as a surgical table. In the second configuration, the C-arm was used biplanar. The operations were performed by 5 surgeons, with each surgeon using each method only twice. During the operation, to find a value closed to direct radiation exposure measurement was made by attaching a dosimeter to the wrist and scatter radiation exposure was measured by attaching a dosimeter to the neck and waist of the surgeons. The operation time and fluoroscopy exposure time were determined.

RESULTS

The duration of operations performed with the biplanar C-arm position and the fluoroscopy exposure time in operations performed with the uniplanar method were found to be statistically significantly longer (p = 0.001). The measurements on the dosimeter worn on the neck of surgeons were found to be statistically significantly higher while using the uniplanar C-arm configuration (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the dosimeter measurements on the wrists and waists of the surgeons and the C-arm configurations (p = 0.820; p = 0.185).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of biplanar C-arm has no effect on radiation exposure to the surgeon's wrist, the most important advantages are that the neck area is exposed to less radiation and it shortens the fluoroscopy time so the use of a biplanar C-arm can be recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Enhancing Radiation Safety Culture: Investigating the Mediating Role of Awareness Among Orthopedic Doctors and Operation Theatre Assistants

INTRODUCTION

The increasing use of minimally invasive orthopedic procedures has led to a greater reliance on fluoroscopy, resulting in elevated radiation exposure for surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, awareness, and daily practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding radiation safety in an academic hospital. Understanding radiation safety is crucial to minimize patient exposure and prevent adverse effects on surgeons.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics of different tertiary care hospitals in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Data were collected prospectively for two years, and a total of 505 participants, including residents, consultants, and operation theatre assistants, completed a questionnaire. The questionnaire was validated by experts and covered information on fluoroscopy usage, frequency of surgeries, awareness of radiation safety, and protective measures. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0.

RESULTS

The majority of participants were male (74.1%), and the sample included various ranks of orthopedic surgeons. Only 56.2% of participants were aware of the usage of fluoroscopy, and 40.2% had read some research on the topic. While 44.6% used lead aprons for radiation protection, the usage of other protective measures and dosimeters was limited. The mediation analysis showed an insignificant indirect association between the rank of orthopedic surgeons, number of surgeries performed, and fluoroscopy usage as a mediator. Awareness and reading research on fluoroscopy were significantly associated with radiation protection.

CONCLUSION

The knowledge, awareness, and daily practices of orthopedic surgeons regarding radiation safety in fluoroscopy use need improvement. The findings emphasize the importance of implementing training programs, providing radiation protection devices, and ensuring compliance with safety guidelines.

Intraoperative fluoroscopic radiation in orthopedic trauma: correlation with surgery type and surgeon experience

Background

While fluoroscopy is widely used in orthopedic trauma surgeries, it is associated with harmful effects and should, therefore, be minimized. However, reference values for these surgeries have not been defined, and it is not known how surgeon experience affects these factors. The aims of this study were to analyze the radiation emitted and exposure time for common orthopedic trauma surgeries and to assess whether they are affected by surgeon experience.

Methods

Data from 1842 trauma orthopedic procedures were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 1421 procedures were included in the analysis. Radiation dose and time were collected to identify reference values for each surgery and compared for when the lead surgeon was a young resident, a senior resident, or a specialist.

Results

The most performed surgeries requiring fluoroscopy were proximal femur short intramedullary nailing (n = 401), ankle open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (n = 141), distal radius ORIF (n = 125), and proximal femur dynamic hip screw (DHS) (n = 114). Surgeries using higher radiation dose were proximal femur long intramedullary nailing (mean dose area [DAP]): 1361.35 mGycm²), proximal femur DHS (1094.81 mGycm²), and proximal femur short intramedullary nailing (891.41 mGycm²). Surgeries requiring longer radiation time were proximal humerus and/or humeral shaft intramedullary nailing (02 mm:20 ss), proximal femur long intramedullary nailing (02 mm:04 ss), and tibial shaft/distal tibia intramedullary nailing (01 mm:49 ss). Senior residents required shorter radiation time when performing short intramedullary nailing of the proximal femur than young residents. Specialists required more radiation dose than residents when performing tibial nailing and tibial plateau ORIF and required longer radiation time than young residents when performing tibial nailing.

Conclusions

This study presents mean values of radiation dose and time for common orthopedic trauma surgeries. Orthopedic surgeon experience influences radiation dose and time values. Contrary to expected, less experience is associated with lower values in some of the cases analyzed.

Improved Radiation Exposure Monitoring of Orthopaedic Residents After Institution of a Personalized Lead Protocol

Background:

Radiation exposure of orthopaedic residents should be accurately monitored to monitor and mitigate risk. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a personalized lead protocol (PLP) with a radiation monitoring officer would improve radiation exposure monitoring of orthopaedic surgery residents.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective case-control study of 15 orthopaedic surgery residents monitored for radiation exposure during a 2-year period (March 2017 until February 2019). During the first 12-month period (phase 1), residents were given monthly radiation dosimeter badges and instructed to attach them daily to the communal lead aprons hanging outside the operating rooms. During the second 12-month period (phase 2), a PLP (PLP group) was instituted in which residents were given lead aprons embroidered with their individual names. A radiation safety officer was appointed who placed the badges monthly on all lead aprons and collected them at the end of the month, whereas faculty ensured residents wore their personalized lead apron. Data collected included fluoroscopy use time and radiation dosimeter readings during all orthopaedic surgeries in the study period.

Results:

There were 1,252 orthopaedic surgeries using fluoroscopy during phase 1 in the control group and 1,269 during phase 2 in the PLP group. The total monthly fluoroscopy exposure time for all cases averaged 190 minutes during phase 1 and 169 minutes during phase 2, with no significant difference between the groups (p < 0.45). During phase 1, 73.1% of the dosimeters reported radiation exposure, whereas during phase 2, 88.7% of the dosimeters reported radiation exposure (p < 0.001). During phase 1, the average monthly resident dosimeter exposure reading was 7.26 millirems (mrem) ± 37.07, vs. 19.00 mrem ± 51.16 during phase 2, which was significantly higher (p < 0.036).

Conclusions:

Institution of a PLP increased the compliance and exposure readings of radiation dosimeter badges for orthopaedic surgery residents, whereas the actual monthly fluoroscopy time did not change. Teaching hospitals should consider implementing a PLP to more accurately monitor exposure.

Level of Evidence:

3.

Robot-assisted fracture fixation in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a systematic review

Objective:

To investigate the applications of robot-assisted surgery and its effect on surgical outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients.

Data Sources:

A search was performed in PubMed and Embase for articles in English, Dutch, German, or French, without restrictions on follow-up times, study size, or year of publication.

Study Selection:

Studies were included if they investigated patients undergoing robot-assisted fracture fixation surgery for orthopaedic trauma.

Data Extraction:

Outcomes studied were operating time, fluoroscopy time/frequency, complications, functional outcomes, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and screw placement accuracy. Critical appraisal was done by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

Data Synthesis:

Narrative review.

Conclusions:

A total of 3832 hits were identified with the search and 8 studies were included with a combined total of 437 included patients, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 cohort study not otherwise specified, 1 case series, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies investigated pelvic ring fractures, 3 studies investigated femur fractures, and 1 study investigated scaphoid fractures. Seven investigated percutaneous screw fixation and 1 studied intramedullary nail fixation. One robotic system was used across all studies, the TiRobot, and all procedures were performed in China. The limited evidence suggests that that robot-assisted orthopaedic trauma surgery may reduce operating time, use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, and improve screw placement accuracy, but the overall quality of evidence was low with a high risk of bias. Robot-assisted fracture fixation does not appear to lead to better functional outcomes for the patient.

Level of evidence: III

Occupational hazard of fluoroscopy: An invisible threat to orthopaedic surgeons

The use of fluoroscopy is widespread within different medical specialties. Improper protection may cause significant radiation hazard to medical personnel. To evaluate the concepts on radiation safety and fluoroscopy use among orthopaedic surgeons and to reflect our current training on this issue, a survey was distributed to perform an audit in our department, an academic unit. Twenty-eight orthopaedic surgeons replied. Amongst our participants, 96.4% used a lead apron at all times. Only 33% used a thyroid shield, 67% never used radiation goggles and 96% never used radiation protection gloves. 53.6% and 46.4% of participants position the fluoroscopy incorrectly in the anteroposterior and lateral positions, respectively, during use. There is clearly a need for improved safety amongst orthopaedic surgeons. A literature review was further performed, showing the hazards of fluoroscopy for doctors, including the risk of cataracts, radiation dermatitis, skin cancer and thyroid cancer. Hazards specific to females, including breast cancer risk, and in-utero irradiation of foetus were also thoroughly discussed. Recommendations towards radiation safety and practical measures to reduce fluoroscopy radiation hazard during procedure were made. Education and training to doctors on this invisible hazard is strongly advised.

A Preliminary Survey of Women Orthopaedic Surgeons on Awareness of Radiation Safety Practice and Breast Cancer Risk in India

OBJECTIVES

To assess women surgeons' awareness of radiation protection protocols, cumulative dose, safety measures, radiation exposure, and breast cancer risk in India.

METHODS

The data were acquired through a survey monkey questionnaire circulated to women orthopaedic surgeons across the country through the WOICE group, e-mails and phone. The questionnaire assessed the respondents' awareness of radiation protection measures and level of exposure. Medical history on breast cancer during their professional life, time of diagnosis, and radiation exposure were collected. Data were analysed and expressed as percentages.

RESULTS

Fifty-one women orthopaedic surgeons responded. These were sub-grouped into early and late-career group based on whether they had worked in orthopaedics for less than 10 years (n = 33) or 10 or more years (n = 18). The mean number of years of practice of the respondents was 8.1 years, and for the group with 10 or more years was 18.7 years. 90.2% reported compliance to the lead shield, while 9.8% (n = 5) were non-compliant because of the shield's weight. Of the included respondents, 88.8% are currently working. Among all the respondents, only 13.7% (n = 7) use a radiation dosimeter. Not surprisingly, 88.2% (n = 45) of all respondents were unaware of the total radiation exposure received. Two surgeons in the more than 10-year practice category reported a history of breast carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary report suggested a need for more awareness of radiation protection measures among women orthopaedic surgeons. Hence, along with the practice of wearing a lead gown, use of lightweight shield, awareness on exposure measure and use of radiation dosimeter should be encouraged.

What we know about intra-operative radiation exposure and hazards to operating theatre staff: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery and increased use of intra-operative fluoroscopy places surgeons and trainees at risk of cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Unfortunately, there is limited published data specific to surgeons on the potential health implications. This study aims to review current literature regarding the hazards of cumulative radiation exposure among operating theatre staff.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of four databases for studies reporting on cumulative intra-operative radiation exposure for operating theatre staff and the hazards associated with prolonged and frequent use. References from relevant studies were screened for additional texts. English language studies, controlled trials and cross-sectional studies were included. Abstracts and full-text studies were assessed for relevance and eligibility independently by two authors using Covidence.

RESULTS

Six studies were included, with cancer being the most commonly reported long-term health hazard possibly associated with cumulative radiation exposure. A 1.85 fold greater prevalence of all cancers and 2.9 fold greater prevalence of breast cancer was reported amongst female orthopaedic surgeons compared to a sex- and age-adjusted population, but the results were not replicated amongst other surgical specialties. Multiple limitations of quantifying health risks of intra-operative radiation exposure were identified, including identifying a dose-effect relationship and confounders such as nulliparity and maternal age.

CONCLUSION

This article highlights the lack of robust evidence regarding the potential hazards of cumulative occupational intra-operative radiation exposure. This study demonstrates the importance of developing standardised national radiation safety protocols for surgical colleges and subspecialties to minimise risks to operating theatre staff.

Comparison of operator and patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and balloon kyphoplasty (BK) are two minimally invasive techniques used to treat mechanical pain secondary to spinal compression fractures. A concern for both procedures is the radiation exposure incurred by both operators and patients. The authors conducted a systematic review of the available literature to examine differences in interventionalist radiation exposure between PV and BK and differences in patient radiation exposure between PV and BK.

METHODS

The authors conducted a search of the PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and Web of Science databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text articles in English describing one of the primary endpoints in ≥ 5 unique patients treated with PV or BK of the mobile spine were included. Estimates of mean operative time, radiation exposure, and fluoroscopy duration were reported as weighted averages. Additionally, annual occupational dose limits provided by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) were used to determine the number needed to harm (NNH).

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 27 articles. For PV, the mean fluoroscopy times were 4.9 ± 3.3 minutes per level without protective measures and 5.2 ± 3.4 minutes with protective measures. The mean operator radiation exposures per level in mrem were 4.6 ± 5.4 at the eye, 7.8 ± 8.7 at the neck, 22.7 ± 62.4 at the torso, and 49.2 ± 62.2 at the hand without protective equipment and 0.3 ± 0.1 at the torso and 95.5 ± 162.5 at the hand with protection. The mean fluoroscopy times per level for BK were 6.1 ± 2.5 minutes without protective measures and 6.0 ± 3.2 minutes with such measures. The mean exposures were 31.3 ± 39.3, 19.7 ± 4.6, 31.8 ± 34.2, and 174.4 ± 117.3 mrem at the eye, neck, torso, and hand, respectively, without protection, and 1, 9.2 ± 26.2, and 187.7 ± 100.4 mrem at the neck, torso, and hand, respectively, with protective equipment. For protected procedures, radiation to the hand was the limiting factor and the NNH estimates were 524 ± 891 and 266 ± 142 for PV and BK, respectively. Patient exposure as measured by flank-mounted dosimeters, entrance skin dose, and dose area product demonstrated lower exposure with PV than BK (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Operator radiation exposure is significantly decreased by the use of protective equipment. Radiation exposure to both the operator and patient is lower for PV than BK. NNH estimates suggest that radiation to the hand limits the number of procedures an operator can safely perform. In particular, radiation to the hand limits PV to 524 and BK to 266 procedures per year before surpassing the threshold set by the USNRC.

Collimation Reduces Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon in Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

 There are no previous studies in the literature comparing the radiation dose to which surgeons are exposed while using a standard fluoroscopy versus collimation during transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (PELD). The aim of this study is to compare this and to evaluate the effectiveness of collimation in reducing radiation exposure.

METHODS

 In this study, the operating surgeon (single surgeon) placed a gamma radiation dosimeter on his chest outside of the lead apron during transforaminal PELD surgeries and measured the radiation exposure immediately after each surgery. As foraminoplasty using free-hand reamers is a longer procedure and requires more fluoroscopy shots, we divided the patients into two groups. The first group consisted of 24 patients (nonforaminoplasty group). The second group consisted of 13 patients (foraminoplasty group). We compared the radiation exposure to the operating surgeon using a standard fluoroscopy versus collimation for each group individually and overall. We randomized the patients within each group based on the order in which they had their respective procedures.

RESULTS

 We analyzed 39 patients who underwent transforaminal PELD between May and December 2019. In both groups, as well as overall, the recorded radiation exposure to the surgeon was significantly lower in surgeries in which collimation was used. In the first group, the radiation dose was 0.083 versus 0.039 mSv per surgery (p = 0.019), whereas in the second group, it was 0.153 versus 0.041 mSv per surgery (p = 0.001), and overall it was 0.108 versus 0.039 mSv per surgery (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 The use of collimation during transforaminal PELD significantly reduces spine the surgeon's exposure to radiation. Therefore, spine surgeons should consider using collimation during transforaminal PELD.

Generic Implant Positioning Technology Based on Hole Projections in X-Ray Images

Implant placement plays a key role in trauma and orthopedics. In this paper, a generic technological concept for implant positioning assistance is outlined. The system utilizes conventional radiographic devices for imaging and tracking and embeds into surgical workflows without the need for complex navigation equipment. It is based on feature extraction from cylindrical hole-projections in X-ray images for determining spatial alignment of implant and anatomy. Basic performance of a prototype system was experimentally verified in terms of tracking accuracy and robustness under varying conditions. In a second step, the system was developed into a set of application modules, each serving a pressing clinical need: Plating of the proximal humerus, cephalic nail and dynamic hip-screw placement, general anatomic plating, distal nail interlocking with adjustment of femoral anteversion and corrective osteotomies. Module prototypes were tested according to their degree of maturity from feasibility assessment in wet-labs to clinical handling tests. Orientation tracking of reference objects yielded an accuracy and precision of 0.1±0.71 deg (mean±standard deviation) with a maximum error of 4.68 deg at unfavorable conditions. This base-performance translated, e.g., into a precision of ±1.2 mm (standard deviation) screw-tip to joint distance at proximal humerus plating, or into a precision of lag screw positioning in the femoral head of ±0.6 mm in craniocaudal and ±1.6 mm in anterioposterior direction. The concept revealed strong potential to improve surgical outcomes in a broad range of orthopedic applications due to its generic and simplistic nature. Comprehensive validation activities must follow for clinical introduction.

EVALUATION OF THE RADIATION DOSE TO THE HANDS OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS DURING FLUOROSCOPY USING STORED IMAGES

Data were collected from 642 orthopaedic interventions during which the images produced by X-rays were recorded. By examining these images, it is possible to determine the time that the orthopaedic surgeons' hands were exposed to the direct radiation beam. The procedures with greater exposure to the direct beam were those involving the hand (median 15 s) and the wrist (median 13 s). Two surgeons wore a ring to measure the absorbed dose at the fingers: one on the dominant hand and the other on the non-dominant hand. The two surgeons performed 34 and 48 operations, respectively, in 14 months. The total doses measured with the rings were 2.30 and 1.04 mSv, respectively. The images of the interventions were examined, determining how much each individual hand was exposed. The interventional reference point (IRPeff (left or right)) was calculated by comparing the doses at the IRP with the exposure times of the right or the left hand. Summing the IRPeff of the two surgeons in 14 months, it is obtained the maximum values of 2.87 mGy for the left hand of one and 6.74 mGy for the right hand of the other, which are of the order of 1/100 of the annual dose limit for the extremities.

The knowledge, awareness and practices of radiation safety amongst orthopaedic surgeons

Background

Fluoroscopic imaging in orthopaedic theatres is increasing, with added risk to the orthopaedic surgeon who is increasingly being exposed to ionising radiation. It is thus crucial for orthopaedic surgeons to have a working knowledge of radiation safety. In spite of these concerns, however, many orthopaedic surgeons do not receive standard training in radiation safety.

Objectives

The evaluation of orthopaedic surgeons' knowledge, awareness and everyday practices regarding radiation safety in an academic hospital.

Methods

A questionnaire with multiple-choice-type questions was developed by a panel of experts and used to conduct a descriptive study. The questionnaire had multiple dimensions, each evaluating orthopaedic knowledge, awareness and practices, respectively. The study population included orthopaedic surgeons rotating within the orthopaedic circuit of the University of Pretoria.

Results

Orthopaedic surgeons regularly make use of fluoroscopic imaging in theatre, with 34 (77%) participants indicating that they use fluoroscopy in more than half of all their procedures performed. Most participants have insufficient knowledge of radiation safety, with the majority failing to correctly answer basic questions on radiation safety. Forty (91%) participants do not wear personal dosimeters, in spite of 39 participants (89%) believing that they are vulnerable to adverse effects. Basic radiation protection devices are underutilised, with 32 (73%) participants indicating that they have not received adequate training in radiation safety.

Conclusion

The majority of orthopaedic surgeons regularly use fluoroscopic imaging in theatre yet lack in-depth knowledge and awareness regarding radiation safety associated with this imaging modality. Implementation of a radiation safety training programme is thus recommended.

Radiation Exposure of Anaesthetists Visualised by Real-time Dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Chronic exposure to occupational ionising radiation is seen as one reason for elevated cancer prevalence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiation exposure of anaesthetists by real-time dosimetry.

METHODS

Data of 296 patients were analyzed. Ten types of trauma operation procedures including osteosynthesis of upper and lower extremity fractures and minimally invasive stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures were accomplished. Evaluation was performed by an occupational dosimetry system, which visualises anaesthetists radiation exposure feedback compared to surgeons in real-time.

RESULTS

A significantly lower radiation exposure to anaesthetists compared to surgeons was observed in four types of operative procedures: Plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures, stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In four types of operations (plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral, distal radial and tibial fractures and intramedullary nailing of the clavicle), anaesthetists` amount of radiation exceeded one-third of the surgeons' exposure, especially if the C-arm tube was positioned close to the anaesthetists work station at the patients' head.

CONCLUSION

By using the occupational radiation dose monitoring system, radiation exposure to anaesthetists was visualised in real-time during trauma operations. Radiation exposure of anaesthetists depends on the type of operation and the position of the C-arm. The system may help to increase anaesthetists` awareness concerning radiation exposure and to enhance compliance in using radiation protection techniques.

Nailfold Capillaroscopic Findings in an Orthopedic Surgeon: Reversible Abnormalities after the Cessation of Radiation Exposure

Interventional fluoroscopy is a leading source of occupational ionizing radiation exposure for medical personnel. For example, orthopedic surgeons represent one occupation where the risk of exposure is large. This occupational hazard is the result of a cumulative dose of radiation over time. Adverse health effects induced by low-dose radiation exposure can arise from daily procedures performed over an entire career. Many of the radiation-induced effects that may develop are transient erythema, permanent epilation, dry desquamation, dermal necrosis and telangiectasia; these effects have occurred on the skin of fingers of interventionalists. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) is a non-invasive technique useful for early detection of radiation-induced effects on microcirculation of fingernails. Here we report on a case of an orthopedic surgeon exposed to radiation for 30 years during his professional career. He performed NVC before and after the end of his professional career, and regression of the microcirculatory abnormalities were documented after cessation of radiation exposure. To our knowledge, this is the first published work in which the regression of chronic low-dose radiation-induced alterations of finger microvessels have been described and documented.

Radiation exposure during direct versus indirect image acquisition during fluoroscopy-controlled internal fixation of a hip fracture: Results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative image acquisition can be obtained indirectly (via verbal request to a technician) or directly (executed at the tableside, by a surgeon stepping on a foot pedal). Direct image acquisition could reduce the exposure time and thus the risk of radiation damage. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare direct surgeon-controlled fluoroscopy with indirect technician-operated fluoroscopy during internal fixation of a hip fracture.

METHODS

From March 5, 2014 to August 19, 2015, 100 patients who had sustained a hip fracture that required internal fixation were enrolled. Patients were randomized between direct surgeon-controlled image acquisition using a foot pedal (n = 52) and indirect image acquisition by a radiology technician (n = 48). The primary outcome measure was the radiation exposure time; secondary outcome measures were the associated effective radiation dose and the dose area product.

(DAP) RESULTS

A total of 96 patients (with a median age of 84 years) were enrolled in this study. Eighty-nine (93%) patients had a pertrochanteric fracture. No statistically significant differences between direct image acquisition and indirect image acquisition were found for overall radiation time, total radiation dose or DAP for the total population. When adjusted for potential confounders, a difference in overall radiation time of 18.50 s (95% CI 2.19; 34.81, p = 0.027) was found in favour of indirect image acquisition.

CONCLUSION

This study showed statistically significantly lower radiation duration using indirect fluoroscopy for the total population and the pertrochanteric fracture subgroup when adjusted for several confounders. No significant effect on radiation dose and DAP was found.

Does surgeon experience influence the amount of radiation exposure during orthopedic procedures? A systematic review

With an increasing use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in operating rooms worldwide, the topic of radiation exposure has become a major concern among hospital staff, doctors and patients alike. Since fluoroscopy has become an integral part in orthopedic intraoperative management, we sought to identify whether surgeon grade or experience plays a role in the amount of radiation used and consequently exposed. We performed a systematic review examining the association between surgeon experience and radiation exposure using primary outcome measures (radiation dose and total screening time/fluoroscopy time). To be included in the review, the study population had to compare varying surgeon experience levels and their effect on the primary outcomes. A total of eighteen studies were included in the review. The studies were a mix of prospective and retrospective studies with low to moderate quality as evaluated by the MINORs criteria. Studies were variable in defining surgeon experience levels and in the type of operations being performed. Majority of the studies showed that inexperienced surgeons/trainees had a higher total fluoroscopy time and a higher mean radiation exposure as compared to experienced surgeons. We conclude that higher surgeon experience significantly reduces usage of fluoroscopy and the consequent radiation exposure in orthopedic procedures. Introduction of strict radiation guidelines involving limited usage of fluoroscopy and supervision of trainees may be beneficial in controlling radiation exposure in the future.

Radiation risk amongst orthopaedic surgeons - Do we know the risk?

Radiation risk amongst orthopaedic surgeons and theatre personnel is increasing with increased use of fluoroscopy imaging. Increased radiation risk has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of malignancies, ocular and thyroid disorders. Very high exposures have been reported in spinal surgery and during intra-medullary nailing. With an increase in modern and percutaneous methods, the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy has increased as well. The aim of this article was to review the available evidence of radiation risk amongst healthcare personnel. A systematic search was carried out in PubMED, CINAHL and Cochrane on intra-operative radiation in trauma and orthopaedic operating room. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies and systematic reviews reporting on radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time and references to specific safety guidelines. This article highlights the safety aspects of radiation protection and harmful effects of radiation during orthopaedic procedures. The responsibility to minimise radiation exposure in operating theatre lies with the team within the operating room.

Camera-augmented mobile C-arm (CamC): A feasibility study of augmented reality imaging in the operating room

BACKGROUND

In orthopaedic trauma surgery, image-guided procedures are mostly based on fluoroscopy. The reduction of radiation exposure is an important goal. The purpose of this work was to investigate the impact of a camera-augmented mobile C-arm (CamC) on radiation exposure and the surgical workflow during a first clinical trial.

METHODS

Applying a workflow-oriented approach, 10 general workflow steps were defined to compare the CamC to traditional C-arms. The surgeries included were arbitrarily identified and assigned to the study. The evaluation criteria were radiation exposure and operation time for each workflow step and the entire surgery. The evaluation protocol was designed and conducted in a single-centre study.

RESULTS

The radiation exposure was remarkably reduced by 18 X-ray shots 46% using the CamC while keeping similar surgery times.

CONCLUSIONS

The intuitiveness of the system, its easy integration into the surgical workflow, and its great potential to reduce radiation have been demonstrated.

Pulsation and Collimation During Fluoroscopy to Decrease Radiation: A Cadaver Study

Background

Awareness of the harmful effects of long-term low-dose radiation is rising. Many studies have assessed both patient and physician exposure to radiation in association with the use of fluoroscopy in the operating room. However, to our knowledge, previous studies have not assessed, in a detailed fashion, the reduction in radiation exposure that pulsation and collimation provide.

Methods

Seven fresh cadavers were irradiated for 5 minutes with C-arm fluoroscopy with use of standard x-ray and pulsed and collimated x-ray beams. The x-ray sources were placed under the table, over the table, and lateral to the table. Radiation exposure doses were measured at different points, such as the center of the radiation field on the cadaver as well as at the locations of the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland. In addition, Monte Carlo simulation (a physics equation to predict exposure) was performed to estimate the dose reduction and to confirm the experimental results.

Results

The radiation exposure doses associated with the use of pulsed fluoroscopy (8 times per second) were reduced by approximately 30% for the patient and by approximately 70% for the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland as compared with those associated with the use of continuous fluoroscopy. The radiation exposure doses associated with the use of collimated beams were reduced to approximately 65% for the surgeon's hand and thyroid gland as compared with those associated with the use of non-collimated fluoroscopy. These results were consistent with the simulation, and the phenomena could be appropriately explained by physics.

Conclusions

The present study revealed the effectiveness of pulsed and collimated x-ray beams in reducing radiation exposure doses resulting from C-arm fluoroscopy. Surgeons should consider using the techniques of pulsed fluoroscopy and collimation to protect patients and themselves from radiation.

Clinical Relevance

This study presents data regarding the reduction of radiation exposure provided by pulsed fluoroscopy and collimation.

The Great Unknown-A systematic literature review about risk associated with intraoperative imaging during orthopaedic surgeries

INTRODUCTION

Modern techniques in orthopaedic surgery using minimally invasive procedures, and increased use of fluoroscopic imaging present a potential increased risk to surgeons due to ionizing radiation exposure. This article is a systematic review of recent literature on radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed and Cochrane searches were performed on intraoperative radiation exposure covering English and German articles published between 1.1.2000 and 11.8.2014. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies and systematic literature reviews focusing on radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons during surgical procedures of the musculoskeletal system reporting either effective dose (whole body) or equivalent dose at the organ level. All included articles were reviewed with focus on the surgical specialty, the procedure type, the imaging system used, the radiation measurement method, the fluoroscopy time, the radiation exposure, the use of radiation protection, and any references to specific safety guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-four eligible publications were identified. However, the lack of well-designed studies focusing on radiation exposure of surgeons prevents pooling of data. Highest exposure and subsequent equivalent doses were reported from spinal surgery (up to 4.8mSv of equivalent dose to the hand) and intramedullary nailing (up to 0.142mSV of equivalent dose to the thyroid). Radiation exposure was reduced by 96.9% and 94.2% when wearing a thyroid collar and a lead apron.

CONCLUSIONS

With the increasing use of intraoperative imaging, there is a growing need for radiation awareness by the operating surgeon. Strict adherence to radiation protection should be enforced to protect in-training surgeons. Strategies to reduce exposure include C-arm position, distance, protective wear, and new imaging technologies. Radiation exposure is harmful and action should be taken to minimize exposure.

Intraoperative radiation safety in orthopaedics: a review of the ALARA (As low as reasonably achievable) principle

The use of fluoroscopy has become commonplace in many orthopaedic surgery procedures. The benefits of fluoroscopy are not without risk of radiation to patient, surgeon, and operating room staff. There is a paucity of knowledge by the average orthopaedic resident in terms proper usage and safety. Personal protective equipment, proper positioning, effective communication with the radiology technician are just of few of the ways outlined in this article to decrease the amount of radiation exposure in the operating room. This knowledge ensures that the amount of radiation exposure is as low as reasonably achievable. Currently, in the United States, guidelines for teaching radiation safety in orthopaedic surgery residency training is non-existent. In Europe, studies have also exhibited a lack of standardized teaching on the basics of radiation safety in the operating room. This review article will outline the basics of fluoroscopy and educate the reader on how to safe fluoroscopic image utilization.

Fluoroscopic freehand and electromagnetic-guided targeting system for distal locking screws of humeral intramedullary nail

PURPOSE

The current techniques used to lock distal screws for the nailing of long bone fractures expose the surgeons, radiologists and patients to a hearty dose of ionizing radiation. The Sureshot™ Distal Targeting System is a new technique that, with the same results, allows for shorter surgery times and, consequently, less exposure to radiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was performed on 59 patients (34 males and 25 females) with a simple humerus fracture diagnosis, type 1.2.A according to the AO classification, who were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with ante-grade intramedullary nailing with distal locking screws inserted with a freehand technique. Group 2 was treated with the intramedullary nail using the Sureshot™ Distal Targeting System. Two intra-operative time parameters were evaluated in both groups: the time needed for the positioning of the distal locking screws and the time of exposure to ionizing radiations during this procedure.

RESULTS

Group 2 showed a lower average distal locking time compared to group 1 (645.48″ vs. 1023.57″) and also a lower average time of exposure to ionizing radiation than in group 1 (4.35″ vs. 28.96″).

CONCLUSION

The Sureshot™ Distal Targeting System has proven to be equally effective when compared to the traditional techniques, with the added benefits of a significant reduction in both surgical time and risk factors related to the exposure to ionizing radiation for all the operating room staff and the patient.

FLUOROSCOPY DURATION IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

Objective: To ascertain the mean length of radiation emission from fluoroscopic devices during several types of orthopedic surgery and which of these required greater use of radiation. Methods: The times taken to perform sixteen different types of surgery (total of 80 procedures) were measured. At the end of each procedure, the length of time for which fluoroscopy was used directly from the image intensifier was ascertained. Results: The mean time required for fluoroscopy per operation was 61 seconds. The procedures that demanded greatest mean duration of radiation use were bilateral proximal femoral epiphysiodesis (5.1 minutes) and femoral shaft osteosynthesis using a locked intramedullary nail (3.33 min). Conclusion: The mean duration of fluoroscopy use in orthopedic operations was 61 seconds. The procedures using an intramedullary device were the ones that required greatest radiation emission.

Evaluation of occupational and patient radiation doses in orthopedic surgery

This study intends to measure the radiation dose to patients and staff during (i) Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) and (ii) Dynamic Cannula Screw (DCS) and to evaluate entrance surface Air kerma (ESAK) dose and organ doses and effective doses. Calibrated Thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD-GR200A) were used. The mean patients' doses were 0.46mGy and 0.07mGy for DHS and DCS procedures, respectively. The mean staff doses at the thyroid and chest were 4.69mGy and 1.21mGy per procedure. The mean organ and effective dose for patients and staff were higher in DHS compared to DCS. Orthopedic surgeons were exposed to unnecessary radiation doses due to the lack of protection measures. The radiation dose per hip procedure is within the safety limit and less than the previous studies.

Real-time dosimetry reduces radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons

BACKGROUND

Cancer prevalence of orthopaedic surgeons is elevated and chronic exposure to occupational ionizing radiation is seen as one reason.

HYPOTHESIS

Use of a new dosimeter enabling radiation dose monitoring in real-time may reduce radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of four months, the surgeon and the C-arm operator were equipped with a novel dosimeter called DoseAware(®) (DA) while using the C-arm fluoroscope intraoperatively. Data of 68 patients DA were retrospectively compared using matched-pair analysis with 68 controls without DA. Both groups were assessed regarding fluoroscopic time (FT) and radiation dose (RD). Seven types of operative procedures were performed: internal fixation of subcapital humerus fractures, midshaft clavicular fractures, distal radius fractures, pertrochanteric femoral fractures, ankle fractures, traumatic vertebral fractures and osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

RESULTS

Concerning the FT, use of DoseAware(®) led to a significant reduction for all evaluated operation types except for internal fixation of distal radius fractures (P=0.0511). Regarding the RD, use of DoseAware(®) led to a significant reduction for all evaluated operation types except trochanteric femoral fractures with a PFNA(®) (P=0.0841).

CONCLUSION

DoseAware(®) allowing real-time radiation dose monitoring reduces radiation exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon and instantly demonstrates the effects of dose-reduction techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective case control study.

Olecranon anatomy: Use of a novel proximal interlocking screw for intramedullary nailing, a cadaver study

AIM: To define the optimum safe angle of use for an eccentrically aligned proximal interlocking screw (PIS) for intramedullary nailing (IMN).

METHODS: Thirty-six dry cadaver ulnas were split into two equal pieces sagitally. The following points were identified for each ulna: the deepest point of the incisura olecrani (A), the point where perpendicular lines from A and the ideal IMN entry point (D) are intersected (C) and a point at 3.5 mm (2 mm safety distance from articular surface + 1.5 mm radius of PIS) posterior from point A (B). We calculated the angle of screws inserted from point D through to point B in relation to D-C and B-C. In addition, an eccentrically aligned screw was inserted at a standard 20° through the anterior cortex of the ulna in each bone and the articular surface was observed macroscopically for any damage.

RESULTS: The mean A-C distance was 9.6 mm (mean ± SD, 9.600 ± 0.763 mm), A-B distance was 3.5 mm, C-D distance was 12.500 mm (12.500 ± 1.371 mm) and the mean angle was 25.9° (25.9°± 2.0°). Lack of articular damage was confirmed macroscopically in all bones after the 20.0° eccentrically aligned screws were inserted. Intramedullary nail fixation systems have well known biological and biomechanical advantages for osteosynthesis. However, as well as these well-known advantages, IMN fixation of the ulna has some limitations. Some important limitations are related to the proximal interlocking of the ulna nail. The location of the PIS itself limits the indications for which intramedullary systems can be selected as an implant for the ulna. The new PIS design, where the PIS is aligned 20°eccentrically to the nail body, allows fixing of fractures even at the level of the olecranon without disturbing the joint. It also allows the eccentrically aligned screw to be inserted in any direction except through the proximal radio-ulnar joint. Taking into consideration our results, we now use a 20° eccentrically aligned PIS for all ulnas. In our results, the angle required to insert the PIS was less than 20° for only one bone. However, 0.7° difference corresponds to placement of the screw only 0.2 mm closer to the articular surface. As we assume 2.0 mm to be a safe distance, a placement of the screw 0.2 mm closer to the articular surface may not produce any clinical symptoms.

CONCLUSION: The new PIS may give us the opportunity to interlock IMN without articular damage and confirmation by fluoroscopy if the nail is manufactured with a PIS aligned at a 20.0° fixed angle in relation to the IMN.

Radiation-free distal locking of intramedullary nails: evaluation of a new electromagnetic computer-assisted guidance system

Distal locking of intramedullary nails (IMNs) is a difficult part of intramedullary nailing (IMN) that could be time-consuming and expose the surgeon, the surgery personnel and the patient to a considerable amount of radiation as fluoroscopy is usually guiding the procedure. Utilization of electromagnetic fields for that purpose offers an attractive alternative. The SURESHOT™ Distal Targeting System (Smith & Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA) is a novel commercially available radiation-free aiming system that utilizes computerized electromagnetic field tracking technology for the distal locking of IMNs. In order to evaluate the efficacy of the system we conducted the present study. Nineteen patients (six females-thirteen males, mean age 39.5 years, range 17-85 years) with closed diaphyseal fracture of the femur (eight patients) or the tibia (eleven patients) were treated with IMN using the SURESHOT™ Distal Targeting System for the distal interlocking. All targeting attempts were successful at first try and followed by correct positioning of the screws. Mean time for distal locking of tibial IMNs (two screws) was 219sec (range 200-250sec). Mean time for distal locking of femoral IMNs (two screws) was 249 (range 220-330sec). In the current study the SURESHOT™ Distal Targeting System proved to be accurate, fast and easy to learn.

2D-fluoroscopic based navigation for Gamma 3 nail insertion versus conventional procedure- a feasibility study

Background

Intramedullary nailing is a standard surgical procedure for fixation of proximal femoral fractures, but is associated with considerable radiation exposure for controlling the implant placement, due to the percutaneous insertion technique.

The aim of this study was the evaluation of potential benefits of 2D-fluoroscopic based navigation focused on the reduction of radiation exposure, a decrease of procedure time, as well as an increase of accuracy for Gamma3 nail insertions.

Methods

Twenty randomized Gamma3 nail insertions were performed in non-fractured synthetic femora according to the manufactures operation guidelines (group I) or with use of a 2D-fluoroscopic based navigation system (group II). Time of different steps of the procedure and the radiation exposure were measured, as well as the accuracy evaluated in postoperative CT scans.

Results and discussion

All Gamma3 nails were placed without any technical problems. Independent of the used procedure, the overall operating time (group I: 584 ± 99.2 sec; group II: 662 ± 64.9 sec; p=0.06) and accuracy of the final nail-positions were equivalent, but the radiation exposure was significantly reduced (92% reduction in fluoroscopic images and 91% reduction in fluoroscopic time, p< 0.01), using the 2D fluoroscopic based navigation procedure.

Conclusions

2D-fluoroscopic based navigation for Gamma3 nail insertion facilitates a relevant reduction of radiation exposure with equivalent accuracy of the final implant position and no prolonged operating time. This promising procedure modification is independent of different cephalomedullary implant manufacturers and specific implant designs, but needs to be evaluated in further clinical settings.

Radiation exposure and adverse health effects of interventional cardiology staff

To the best of our knowledge, this chapter constitutes the first systematic review of radiation exposure to eyes, thyroid, and hands for Interventional Cardiology (IC) staff. We have concluded from our review that these anatomical locations are likely to be exposed to radiation as a result of the limited use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among IC staff as shown in Fig. 8. Our review also reveals that, with the exception of three eye exposure cases, the annual radiation dose to eyes, thyroid, and hands among IC staff was within recommended levels and limits. The As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) limit was not achieved in three cases for fingers/hands and four cases for eyes. However, an increased incidence of cataracts were reported for IC staff, and this gives rise to the concern that low-dose or unnoticed exposures may increase the risk of developing cataracts among cardiology staff. Clearly, the formation of cataracts among IC staff may be an issue and should be studied in more depth. Our review also disclosed that the two groups who receive excessive radiation doses (i.e., exceed the recommended limit) are physicians-in-training and junior staff physicians who work in cardiac catheterization laboratories. In particular, more attention should be given to assessing the effects of radiation exposure among IC staff who work in the Asia Pacific countries, because our review indicates that the number of IC procedures performed by IC staff in these countries is higher than for other continents. There is a huge demand for procedures conducted by IC staff in the Asia-Pacific area, for both treating patients and consulting with specialists. Our review also disclosed that recommended limits for per-procedure radiation doses are needed for IC staff. We recommend that such limits be established by the appropriate national and international agencies that are responsible for occupational radiation exposure. Although our review indicates that the current precautions against LDR exposure for IC staff are adequate in most cases, we are concerned about the relatively high incidence of cataracts reported to exist among IC staff. Therefore, we believe that there is a need for a strict implementation of radiation safety practices in cardiology laboratories and associated workplaces that utilize radiation. The action that is most important for protecting staff in the workplace against radiation exposure is the regular use of personal protective equipment or shielding. Working at a safe distance from instruments and assuring that such instruments are in the proper position are other techniques that can reduce the radiation dose received by IC staff.

Radiation exposure of eyes, thyroid gland and hands in orthopaedic staff: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Various procedures, especially minimal invasive techniques using fluoroscopy, pose a risk of radiation exposure to orthopaedic staff. Anatomical sites such as the eyes, thyroid glands and hands are more vulnerable to radiation considering the limited use of personal protective devices in the workplace. The objective of the study is to assess the annual mean cumulative and per procedure radiation dose received at anatomical locations like eyes, thyroid glands and hands in orthopaedic staff using systematic review.

METHODS

The review of literature was conducted using systematic search of the database sources like PUBMED and EMBASE using appropriate keywords. The eligibility criteria and the data extraction of literature were based on study design (cohort or cross-sectional study), study population (orthopaedic surgeons or their assistants), exposure (doses of workplace radiation exposure at hands/fingers, eye/forehead, neck/thyroid), language (German and English). The literature search was conducted using a PRISMA checklist and flow chart.

RESULTS

Forty-two articles were found eligible and included for the review. The results show that radiation doses for the anatomical locations of eye, thyroid gland and hands were lower than the dose levels recommended. But there is a considerable variation of radiation dose received at all three anatomical locations mainly due to different situations including procedures (open and minimally invasive), work experience (junior and senior surgeons),distance from the primary and secondary radiation, and use of personal protective equipments (PPEs). The surgeons receive higher radiation dose during minimally invasive procedures compared to open procedures. Junior surgeons are at higher risk of radiation exposure compared to seniors. PPEs play a significant role in reduction of radiation dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the current radiation precautions appear to be adequate based on the low dose radiation, more in-depth studies are required on the variations of radiation dose in orthopaedic staff, at different anatomical locations and situations.

Evaluation of a new computer-assisted surgical planning and navigation system based on two-dimensional fluoroscopy for insertion of a proximal femoral nail: an experimental study

Pertrochanteric femoral fractures are common and intramedullary nailing is an accepted method for their surgical treatment. Accurate placement of the implant is essential to ensure fixation. The conventional technique can require multiple guide wire passes, and relies heavily on fluoroscopy. A computer-assisted planning and navigation system based on two-dimensional fluoroscopy for guide wire placement in the femoral neck has been developed, in order to perform intramedullary pertrochanteric fracture fixation using the proximal femoral nail (PFNA). The planning process was supported by a 'zero-dose C-arm navigation' system. The PFNA was inserted into 12, intact, femoral sawbones guided by the computer-based navigation, and into 12, intact, femoral sawbones using a conventional fluoroscopic-assisted technique. Guide wire and subsequent blade placement in the femoral neck was evaluated. The computer-assisted technique achieved a significant decrease in the number of required fluoroscopic images and in the number of guide wire passes. The obtained average blade placement accuracy in the femoral neck was equivalent to the conventional technique. The operation time was significantly longer in the navigation-assisted group. The addition of computer-assisted planning and surgical guidance to the intramedullary nailing of pertrochanteric femoral fractures offers a number of clinical benefits based on the results of this sawbone study. Further studies including fractured sawbones and cadaver models with extension of the navigation process to all steps of PFNA introduction and with the goal of reducing operation time are indispensable before integration of this navigation system into clinical practice.

Utilização de vestimentas de proteção radiológica para redução de dose absorvida: uma revisão integrativa da literatura

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a relação entre o uso de vestimenta de proteção radiológica e a diminuição da dose absorvida de radiação ionizante, reforçando a eficácia do seu uso tanto para pacientes quanto para indivíduos ocupacionalmente expostos. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: O estudo foi desenvolvido utilizando-se o método de revisão integrativa de literatura, e teve como materiais: 21 artigos, 2 livros, 1 tese, 1 trabalho de conclusão de curso, 1 programa de computador, 4 pesquisas em base de dados (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística e Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde) e 2 diretrizes de proteção radiológica. RESULTADOS: A utilização da vestimenta de proteção radiológica, teoricamente, reduz 86% a 99% a dose absorvida. Na prática, a redução nos pacientes pode ser de 88% na radiologia convencional e chegar a 95% no exame tomográfico. Nos indivíduos ocupacionalmente expostos, a redução durante um cateterismo cardíaco é em torno de 90% e durante uma cirurgia ortopédica é de 75%. CONCLUSÃO: Conforme demonstrado em várias pesquisas, o uso de vestimenta de proteção radiológica é eficaz e de baixo custo e reduz a dose desnecessária nos pacientes e nos indivíduos ocupacionalmente expostos. Logo, sua utilização é necessária para a implementação de um efetivo programa de proteção radiológica em um serviço de radiodiagnóstico.

[Evaluation of a 2D fluoroscopy-based navigation system for insertion of femoral neck screws. An experimental study]

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was the evaluation of a new computer-assisted planning and navigation system based on 2D-fluoroscopy for guidewire insertion in order to perform cannulated screw placement into the femoral neck. The image acquisition process was supported by a radiation-saving procedure called Zero-dose C-arm navigation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the context of a sawbone study, we performed insertion of 3 cannulated screws positioned under navigation control as well as using the conventional technique in 12 sawbones. Both procedures were performed using open and closed techniques.

RESULTS

The computer-assisted technique significantly reduced the amount of intraoperative fluoroscopic images (open technique: -14±3 images, closed technique: -29.4±6 images). Drilling attempts were reduced in the computer-assisted groups (open technique: -1.2±1 attempts, closed technique: -1.7±1.5 attempts) and the femoral neck area covered by the screws was greater in the navigation-assisted groups (open technique: +32.1±16.3 mm(2), closed technique: +32.6±14.9 mm(2)), There was no difference concerning parallelism of the screws or perforation of femoral neck or head. The operation time was significantly longer in the navigation-assisted groups (open technique: +24.2±2.1 min, closed technique: +22.8±5.8 min).

CONCLUSION

The addition of computer-assisted planning and surgical guidance supported by Zero-dose C-arm navigation can be useful for the fixation of medial femoral neck fractures with cannulated screws. Further studies with the goal of reducing the operation time are indispensable before integrating this navigation system into the clinical workflow.

Dosimetry during intramedullary nailing of the tibia

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary nailing under fluoroscopic guidance is a common operation. We studied the intraoperative radiation dose received by both the patient and the personnel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

25 intramedullary nailing procedures of the tibia were studied. All patients suffered from tibial fractures and were treated using the Grosse-Kempf intramedullary nail, with free-hand technique for fixation of the distal screws, under fluoroscopic guidance. The exposure, at selected positions, was recorded using an ion chamber, while the dose area product (DAP) was measured with a DAP meter, attached to the tube head. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to derive the occupational dose to the personnel, and also to monitor the surface dose on the gonads of some of the patients.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 101 (48-240) min, with a mean fluoroscopic time of 72 seconds and a mean DAP value of 75 cGy x cm(2). The surface dose to the gonads of the patients was less than 8.8 mGy during any procedure, and thus cannot be considered to be a contraindication for the use of this technique. Occupational dose differed substantially between members of the operating personnel, the maximum dose recorded being to the operator of the fluoroscopic equipment (0.11 mSv).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings underscore the care required by the primary operator not to exceed the dose constraint of 10 mSv per year. The rest of the operating personnel, although they do not receive very high doses, should focus on the dose optimization of the technique.

A study on the radiation dose of the orthopaedic surgeon and staff from a mini C-arm fluoroscopy unit

In this study, radiation exposure to the surgeon and supporting staff from a mini C-arm unit during fluoroscopically guided orthopaedic surgeries was studied. A Diadose dosemeter and Gamma-Scout meter were used for air-kerma measurements for primary and scattered radiations. The entrance dose of hands, eyes and thyroid of the surgeon was measured during direct observation. Scattered air-kerma rate was measured to quantify the received entrance dose of the supporting staff. During direct observation, the skin-entrance exposure rates of the surgeon's hand, eye and thyroid gland were 8036, 0.85 and 0.9 microGy min(-1), respectively. The scattered exposure rate was precipitously dropped beyond the path of the primary radiation beam, and reached 0.51 microGy min(-1) at a distance of 40 cm from the beam's central axis. This study showed that the surgeon's hand was the most dose-limiting organ for fluoroscopically guided orthopaedic surgery procedures when it was exposed to primary radiation. The exposure of supporting staff at a working distance of >20 cm from the beam was minimal during fluoroscopy by mini C-arm unit.

Cervical spine imaging using standard C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to ionizing radiation

STUDY DESIGN

A cadaveric cervical spine specimen is imaged with a standard C-arm fluoroscope during a simulated procedure. Patient and surgeon exposure to radiation is estimated by placing dosimeters at various locations in 3-dimensional space.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation exposure to patient and surgeon when using C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated cadaveric surgical procedure involving the cervical spine.

SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA

The use of mobile fluoroscopy has become commonplace in orthopaedics. With the current trend towards minimal access techniques, fluoroscopy has become requisite to achieving satisfactory outcomes. Studies have shown that spine surgeons may be at elevated risk for radiation exposure compared to other orthopaedists. Exposure while using C-arm fluoroscopy for procedures involving the pelvis, as well as thoracic and lumbar spine has been documented. However, there are no equivalent studies that evaluate exposure during cervical spine imaging.

METHODS

A standard OEC 9800 C-arm was used to image a prepared cadaveric cervical spine specimen, which was suspended on an adjustable platform. Film badge dosimeters were mounted at various positions and angles to detect direct and scatter radiation. Testing was conducted in various radiation dose mapping "scenarios." The configurations tested altered the proximity of the specimen and jig relative to the radiation source. We attempted to capture radiation exposure in various locations, from a best-case to a worst-case scenario, as may be realistically encountered in a procedural setting. RESULTS.: Potential exposure to the patient and surgeon were consistently measurable, and of concern. As the imaged specimen was positioned closer to the radiation source, exposure to the patient was markedly amplified. Exposure to the surgeon did not increase as dramatically. There was a great degree of variability in the exposure doses recorded by the peripheral dosimeters. Even dosimeters that were placed in the same plane diverged widely in their measured exposure. This highlights the influence of the shape of the imaged specimen on reflected scatter. Scatter radiation doses on both sides of the specimen were similar.

CONCLUSION

Care should be taken when working on both sides of the imaged subject. Considerable radiation exposure can be encountered when working with a C-arm fluoroscope if appropriate precautions are not observed. All appropriate radiation dose-reducing measures should be strictly enforced by the supervising physician to minimize risk to the patient and the medical team.

Trauma team radiation exposure: the potential need for dosimetry monitoring

OBJECTIVES

Australian radiation regulations require routine monitoring of health-care workers who might receive a whole-body effective radiation dose in excess of 1 mSv/year. In Australian hospitals, routine monitoring with a dosimeter is recommended for levels beyond 300 microSv/year. We aimed to determine the potential radiation exposure to trauma team members and whether routine personal radiation dosimetry should be recommended.

METHOD

An anthropomorphic mannequin with a radiation detector was placed at five locations around the resuscitation bed. Three sets of standard trauma-series X-rays were performed, and the exposure was measured and averaged at each location. These data were then extrapolated to estimate the potential radiation equivalence at the level of the thyroid gland for staff working in each of the locations over a 1 year period with and without personal protective equipment.

RESULTS

The total dose ranged from 1.2 to 20.5 microSv for a single trauma patient. The highest recorded dose was at the location of the circulation doctor during pelvic X-ray. Based on these data, it would take only 15 trauma patients per year for a team member to be potentially exposed to the level at which routine dosimetry is usually recommended, should no personal protective equipment be used. The use of a lead gown and a lead gown with a thyroid collar reduced exposure by four- and ninefold, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated the possibility of significant ionizing radiation exposure for unprotected trauma team members. Dosimeter use by trauma team personnel needs to be reviewed based on local protocols and patient numbers.

Navigating the fluoroscope's C-arm back into position: an accurate and practicable solution to cut radiation and optimize intraoperative workflow

OBJECTIVES

During complex image-guided orthopedic trauma procedures, repetitive fluoroscopic scout imaging is performed. A number of preparatory positioning images often must be taken to reproduce a comparable projection. These scout images have no intrinsic clinical relevance but nevertheless expose the patient and the surgical team to considerable radiation, which could be avoided. This study presents and validates a method to decrease intraoperative radiation.

METHODS

Precision, time requirements, and number of scout images for repositioning the fluoroscope, with and without navigation aid, were recorded on 20 test-rig and 3 phantom setups. A commercially available image-guided surgical navigation system (Vector Vision, BrainLAB), originally designed for instrument navigation, was employed to register and retrieve the C-arm positions. A newly developed software computed the necessary moves to reposition the C-arm on an intuitive visual display.

RESULTS

Retrieving a given C-arm position with the conventional non-navigated technique required an average of 7 scout images (range, 3 to 12 images). In contrast, navigation-assisted repositioning did not necessitate a single scout image. Deviations from the original projection were minimal for both navigated (0.9 degrees, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.1 degrees) and non-navigated repositioning (0.8 degrees, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.9 degrees). Average positioning times were comparable when navigating the C-arm (46 seconds, 95% CI 41 to 51 seconds) and in scout image-based positioning (49 seconds, 95% CI 44 to 53 seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

Navigated C-arm positioning avoids multiple scout images and yields sufficient precision for clinical deployment. Radiation exposure can be reduced considerably by a combination of instrument navigation and navigated C-arm positioning.

X-ray-based machine vision system for distal locking of intramedullary nails

In surgical procedures for femoral shaft fracture treatment, current techniques for locking the distal end of intramedullary nails, using two screws, rely heavily on the use of two-dimensional X-ray images to guide three-dimensional bone drilling processes. Therefore, a large number of X-ray images are required, as the surgeon uses his/her skills and experience to locate the distal hole axes on the intramedullary nail. The long-term effects of X-ray radiation and their relation to different types of cancer still remain uncertain. Therefore, there is a need to develop a surgical technique that can limit the use of X-rays during the distal locking procedure. A robotic-assisted orthopaedic surgery system has been developed at Loughborough University to assist orthopaedic surgeons by reducing the irradiation involved in such operations. The system simplifies the current approach as it uses only two near-orthogonal X-ray images to determine the drilling trajectory of the distal locking holes, thereby considerably reducing irradiation to both the surgeon and patient. Furthermore, the system uses robust machine vision features to reduce the surgeon's interaction with the system, thus reducing the overall operating time. Laboratory test results have shown that the proposed system is very robust in the presence of variable noise and contrast in the X-ray images.

Computer navigation allows for accurate reduction of femoral fractures

Femoral nailing for reduction and stabilization of femoral fractures is a common orthopaedic procedure. However, angular and rotational malalignment is not an infrequent result, and extensive use of fluoroscopy is commonly involved. We tested the accuracy of a computerized navigation system to enhance multiplanar fracture reduction and to decrease the requirement for fluoroscopy. We used a cadaveric femur fixed in a simulator and optically tracked. After obtaining five fluoroscopic images for each reduction attempt, accuracy measurements were taken. We first measured alignment of the intact bone using the navigation system, followed by open and blind reduction of simple and segmental fractures. For the blind, closed reduction trials, the accuracy of restoration of femoral length was 1.2 +/- 0.4 mm (mean +/- standard deviation) for a simple fracture and 1.9 +/- 1.8 mm for a segmental fracture. Rotational accuracy was 1.7 degrees +/- 1.9 degrees and 2.5 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees, respectively. Open reduction using this model yielded no difference between the reduced fracture and the intact bone in coronal and rotational alignment. Computerized navigation has the potential for increasing precision in fracture reduction while minimizing fluoroscopic requirements.

Radiation exposure during pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is fluoroscopy safe?

STUDY DESIGN

With institutional review board approval, prospective data were collected during fluoroscopically guided pedicle screw placement.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate a surgeon's radiation exposure with all screw constructs during surgery to repair idiopathic scoliosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To our knowledge, there is no established consensus regarding the safety of radiation exposure during fluoroscopically guided procedures.

METHODS

A surgeon was outfitted intraoperatively with a thermoluminescent dosimeter to estimate radiation exposure to his whole body and thyroid gland.

RESULTS

The index surgeon is projected to receive 13.49 mSv of whole body ionizing radiation and 4.31 mSv of thyroid gland irradiation annually. The National Council on Radiation Protection's current recommendations set lifetime dose equivalent limits for classified workers (radiologists) at 10 mSv per year of life and at 3 mSv for nonclassified workers (spinal surgeons). At the levels estimated, a surgeon beginning his/her career at age 30 years would exceed the lifetime limit for nonclassified workers in less than 10 years. The National Council on Radiation Protection limits the single-year maximum safe dosage to the thyroid to 500 mSv; the yearly exposure estimated here is significantly less.

CONCLUSIONS

The spinal surgeon's intraoperative radiation exposure may be unacceptable. Spinal surgeons should be considered classified workers and monitored accordingly. Methods to lower radiation dosage seem strongly indicated.