Increased medial and lateral tibial posterior slopes are independent risk factors for graft failure following ACL reconstruction

Identifying Risk Factors from Preoperative MRI Measurements for Failure of Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Nested Case-Control Study with 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Identifying patients at high risk for failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on the basis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements has received considerable attention. In this study, we aimed to identify potential risk factors for primary ACLR failure from preoperative MRI measurements and to determine optimal cutoff values for clinical relevance.

METHODS

Retrospective review and follow-up were conducted in this nested case-control study of patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACLR using hamstring tendon autograft at our institution from August 2016 to January 2018. The failed ACLR group included 72 patients with graft failure within 5 years after primary ACLR, while the control group included 144 propensity score-matched patients without failure during the 5-year follow-up period. Preoperative MRI measurements were compared between the 2 groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to determine the optimal cutoff values for the significant risk factors. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, and survival analyses were performed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the determined thresholds.

RESULTS

A greater lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) (p = 0.0076), greater posterior tibial slope in the lateral compartment (LPTS) (p = 0.0002), and greater internal rotational tibial subluxation (IRTS) (p < 0.0001) were identified in the failed ACLR group compared with the control group. ROC analyses showed that the optimal cutoff values for IRTS and LPTS were 5.8 mm (area under the curve [AUC], 0.708; specificity, 89.6%; sensitivity, 41.7%) and 8.5° (AUC, 0.655; specificity, 71.5%; sensitivity, 62.5%), respectively. Patients who met the IRTS (OR, 6.14; hazard ratio [HR], 3.87) or LPTS threshold (OR, 4.19; HR, 3.07) demonstrated a higher risk of primary ACLR failure and were significantly more likely to experience ACLR failure in a shorter time period.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative MRI measurements of increased IRTS, LPTS, and LFCR were identified as risk factors for primary ACLR failure. The optimal cutoff value of 5.8 mm for IRTS and 8.5° for LPTS could be valuable in the perioperative management of primary ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Slope-Reducing Tibial Osteotomy With Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Clinical and Radiological Results in Patients With a Steep Posterior Tibial Slope and Excessive Anterior Tibial Subluxation: Propensity Score Matching With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

A steep posterior tibial slope (PTS) and excessive anterior tibial subluxation of the lateral compartment (ASLC) have been considered to be associated with inferior graft outcomes in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Case series studies have demonstrated that combined slope-reducing tibial osteotomy can greatly improve knee functional scores and stability in revision ACLR. However, there is currently no comparative study evaluating the clinical benefits of osteotomy procedures in primary ACLR.

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of combined slope-reducing tibial osteotomy and primary ACLR in patients with a steep PTS and excessive ASLC and to explore the suitable threshold for osteotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2022, of the 108 patients with ACL injuries who had a steep PTS (≥15°) and a follow-up ≥2 years, 30 patients with excessive ASLC (≥6 mm) underwent concomitant slope-reducing tibial osteotomy and ACLR (osteotomy group), and 78 patients underwent isolated ACLR (control group). Propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio was used to match preoperative variables between the 2 groups. After matching preoperative variables, 25 and 48 patients underwent combined surgery and isolated ACLR, respectively. The primary outcome was ACL graft status (failure and laxity rates). The secondary outcomes were ASLC and anterior tibial subluxation of the medial compartment (ASMC), KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference (SSD), pivot-shift grade, and second-look arthroscopic findings. Stratified analysis was performed with 1° PTS increments to explore the osteotomy threshold.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, side, body mass index, PTS, graft diameter, time from injury to surgery, ASLC, ASMC, KT-1000 arthrometer SSD, pivot-shift grade, and meniscal injuries (all P > .05). The mean PTS significantly decreased from 18.2° to 6.7° (P < .001) in the osteotomy group. The 2-year rate of ACL graft laxity was 12.0% in the osteotomy group and 35.4% in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (P = .033). There was no significant difference in the 2-year rate of ACL graft failure between the 2 groups (8.0% vs 12.5%, respectively; P = .559). The final follow-up data showed that improvements in ASLC (4.5 vs 6.4 mm, respectively; P = .012) and ASMC (2.8 vs 4.5 mm, respectively; P = .014) were more significant in the osteotomy group compared with the control group. On the second-look arthroscopic examination, the incidence of graft roof impingement in the control group was significantly higher than that in the osteotomy group (22.9% vs 4.0%, respectively; P = .039). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of KT-1000 arthrometer SSD and high-grade pivot shift (P > .05). Furthermore, stratified analysis revealed that the combined procedure significantly reduced the ACL graft failure rate and improved the KT-1000 arthrometer SSD in patients with a preoperative PTS ≥16°.

CONCLUSION

Slope-reducing tibial osteotomy combined with primary ACLR significantly decreased the amount of anterior tibial subluxation, the incidence of graft roof impingement, and the graft laxity rate for patients with a steep PTS (≥15°) and excessive ASLC (≥6 mm). Furthermore, in patients with a PTS ≥16°, the combined procedure improved anterior knee stability and reduced the graft failure rate. Therefore, a PTS ≥16° plus ASLC ≥6 mm may be considered an appropriate indication for combining slope-reducing tibial osteotomy with primary ACLR.

Patient Age and Activity Level, Posterior Tibial Slope, and Use of Allograft Are Significant Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To assess the consistency of risk factor reporting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure after primary reconstruction, identify risk factors more frequently associated with ACLR failure, and help clinicians prevent reinjury in patients with risk factors for ACLR failure.

Methods

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used to conduct a systematic review. Initial title and abstract screening yielded 561 studies, from which 76 studies were assessed for eligibility. Thirty-two full-text studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) clinical studies of anterior cruciate ligament injuries; (2) patients undergoing ACLR; (3) clinical outcome data, including failure rate; (4) studies assessing preoperative risk factors for failure; and (5) manuscripts published within the past 6 years. These studies were subdivided into those that defined ACLR failure as revision surgery or graft failure.

Results

Ten risk factors were included in the review for 22 studies defining ACLR failure as revision surgery. Eight risk factors were included in the review for 10 studies defining ACLR failure as graft failure. Posterior tibial slope (PTS) (80%, 4/5 studies), age (79%, 11/14 studies), and graft characteristics (71%, 5/7 studies) such as allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, high-dose radiation, and BioCleanse preparation technique were the most significant risk factors for revision ACLR. PTS (100%, 2/2 studies) and activity level (67%, 2/3 studies) were the most significant risk factors for graft failure.

Conclusions

Age, PTS, use of allograft, and activity level are significant preoperative risk factors that should be considered when attempting to prevent reinjury in ACLR candidates. Studies investigating risk factors for ACLR failure often fail to control for confounding variables that can influence outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

Increased posterior tibial slope is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury and graft failure after reconstruction: A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) graft failure are important clinical concerns that result in long recovery periods, potential long-term knee instability, and poor patient outcomes. Identifying risk factors such as posterior tibial slope (PTS), meniscal slope (MS), and meniscal bone angle (MBA) is important for improving risk stratification, guiding management decisions, and reducing the incidence of both ACL injury and ACLR graft failure.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to determine whether increased PTS, increased MS, and decreased MBA serve as independent predictors of both ACL injury and ACLR graft failure.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. For evaluating ACL injury, the review included comparative studies measuring PTS, MS, or MBA between ACL injury patients and ACL-intact controls. For ACLR graft failure, studies comparing these measurements between patients with ACLR graft failures and those with successful ACLR outcomes were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to calculate the overall mean difference (MD) between groups.

FINDINGS

Out of 1,683 initially identified studies, 75 studies were selected for detailed analysis, 53 analyzing ACL injury and 24 studies analyzing ACLR graft failure. The meta-analysis revealed that increased PTS significantly increases the risk of both ACL injury (MD 1.64°; 95% CI: 1.08-2.20, p ​< ​0.01) and ACLR graft failure (MD 1.76°; 95% CI: 1.03-2.48, p ​< ​0.01). This is statistically significant for both lateral and medial PTS, and across both radiograph and magnetic resonance imaging. A higher lateral MS (MD 3.25°; 95% CI: 1.70-4.80, p ​< ​0.01) and a lower lateral MBA (MD -3.85°; 95% CI: -6.38-1.32, p ​< ​0.01) were also significantly associated with an increased risk of ACL injury. However, no statistically significant differences were observed for MS or MBA between ACLR graft failure and successful ACLR groups.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The findings indicate that increased PTS, whether measured medially or laterally, is a statistically significant risk factor for both ACL injury and ACLR graft failure. Additionally, increased lateral MS and decreased lateral MBA are associated with ACL injury. This evidence supports the consideration of tibial slope in risk assessment, preoperative planning, and surgical decision-making for both prevention of ACL injury and ACLR procedures. Further research is necessary to fully understand the role of MS and MBA in ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; systematic review of level III-IV studies.

Single-bundle ACL combined with ALL reconstruction yields comparable outcomes in patients with varied anatomical risk factors for ACL graft failure

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is influenced by factors such as meniscal tears and tibial plateau slope. Combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has reduced failure rates; however, its efficacy in high-risk patients remains unclear. This study hypothesized that combined ACL and ALL reconstruction would yield similar clinical outcomes in patients with varying risks of ACL failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 76 patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction between June 2018 and June 2021 were included. The medial tibial slope (MTS), lateral tibial slope (LTS), and anterior tibial translation (ATT) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiography of the knee joint. The meniscal lesions were assessed during surgery. Preoperative clinical assessments and final follow-up were conducted using patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Tegner Activity scale. PROMs were collected at least two years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 32.5 ± 7.4 months. There were no significant differences in postoperative IKDC score, Lysholm score, or Tegner activity score between patients with or without medial meniscus injury (p = 0.155, 0.914, and 0.042, respectively), with or without lateral meniscus injury (p = 0.737, 0.569, and 0.942, respectively), medial tibial slope > 12° or ≤ 12° (p = 0.290, 0.496, and 0.988, respectively), or lateral tibial slope > 7.4° or ≤ 7.4° (p = 0.213, 0.625, and 0.922, respectively). No significant correlations were found between anterior tibial translation and postoperative IKDC (R = -0.058, p = 0.365), Lysholm (R = -0.017, p = 0.459), or Tegner activity scores (R = -0.147, p = 0.189).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction provides reliable and comparable clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk factors for ACL graft failure, such as increased tibial slope or meniscal injury. Our results suggest that the indications for ALL reconstruction may be expanded to include patients with a high tibial slope or meniscal injury, because these factors have been shown to contribute to increased rotational instability and high rates of ACL graft failure. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with large patient cohorts and long follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings and establish clear guidelines for patient selection and surgical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Variability Between Full-Length Lateral Radiographs and Standard Short Knee Radiographs When Evaluating Posterior Tibial Slope in Revision ACL Patients

Background

Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been identified as a risk factor for failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Correction of PTS may improve outcomes after revision ACL reconstruction. There are conflicting reports demonstrating the measurement of the PTS on standard short knee (SSK) radiographs versus full-length lateral (FLL) radiographs including the entire tibia.

Purpose/Hypothesis

To compare PTS measurements between SSK and FLL radiographs in patients who failed primary ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that there would be high variability between the SSK and FLL radiographic measurements.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

The medial and lateral PTS were measured on the SSK and FLL radiographs of 33 patients with failed primary ACL reconstructions. All measurements were performed by 2 trained independent observers (A.A.M., J.S.), and inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Measurements recorded by the observer with the higher intraobserver ICC were used for comparison of the PTS on SSK versus FLL radiographs.

Results

Both the inter- and the intraobserver reliability values of the PTS measurements were excellent. There was a significant difference in mean PTS on the medial plateau as measured on the SSK and FLL radiographs (11.2°± 5.3° vs 12.5°± 4.6°; P = .03), with the FLL radiographs demonstrating higher PTS. There was also a significant difference in the mean PTS on the lateral plateau as measured on SSK versus FLL radiographs (10.7°± 4.3° vs 12.2°± 4°, respectively; P = .01), with the FLL radiographs demonstrating higher PTS. Notably, 66.67% of the absolute measurements for PTS on the medial plateau differed by ≥2°, with variability as high as 8.5°.

Conclusion

Results indicated that FLL and SSK radiographs are not interchangeable measurements for PTS associated with failed ACL reconstruction. Because FLL radiographs demonstrate less variability than SSK radiographs, we recommend obtaining them to evaluate these complex patients.

Malrotated lateral knee radiographs do not allow for a proper assessment of medial or lateral posterior tibial slope

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether malrotation of lateral knee radiographs influences posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements.

METHODS

Lateral knee radiographs of all patients who underwent knee surgery at a single institution between June 2022 and January 2023 and received multiple lateral knee radiographs were included. Radiographs were categorised as malrotated lateral knee radiographs or lateral knee radiographs based on the radiographic distance between the medial and lateral posterior femoral condyles. Medial PTS (MPTS) and lateral PTS (LPTS) were evaluated on malrotated lateral knee radiographs and lateral knee radiographs and compared using the paired t test. Intra- and interrater reliability between four raters were assessed for MPTS and LPTS measurements.

RESULTS

A total of 92 lateral knee radiographs (46 pairs of malrotated lateral knee radiographs and lateral knee radiographs; 50.0% right side) from 46 patients (33.2 ± 12.4 years, 69.6% male) were included. Mean posterior femoral condyle distance in malrotated lateral knee radiographs was 8.1 ± 4.4 mm. Overall, MPTS and LPTS were significantly higher on malrotated lateral knee radiographs versus lateral knee radiographs (medial: 10.5 ± 3.2° vs. 9.7 ± 3.5°, p < 0.05; lateral: 10.6 ± 3.4° vs. 9.7 ± 3.3°, p < 0.05). Mean absolute difference between MPTS and LPTS on malrotated lateral knee radiographs versus lateral knee radiographs were |1.9| ± |1.5|° and |2.0| ± |1.8|°, respectively. Intrarater reliability was 'moderate' and interrater reliability was 'good' for both MPTS and LPTS.

CONCLUSION

Malrotation of lateral knee radiographs led to a significant distortion of both the MPTS and LPTS. In clinical practice, attention should be placed on the (mal)rotation of lateral knee radiographs, especially in patients for whom a slope-correcting osteotomy is being discussed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Correlation between higher lateral tibial slope and inferior long term subjective outcomes following single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The impact of anatomical factors, such as the lateral tibial slope (LTS), on outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an area of growing interest. This study was led by the observation that patients with a higher LTS may have different recovery trajectories.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between a higher LTS and long term subjective outcomes following single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study comprised 138 patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. The LTS was measured on preoperative radiographs. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected, which included the Lysholm Knee Score, UCLA Activity Score, IKDC Score, and Tegner Activity Score, over a mean follow-up duration of 137 months.

RESULTS

A significant negative correlation was found between LTS and all measured PROMs (p < 0.001). The established cut-off value of LTS distinguishing between "Good" and "Fair" Lysholm scores was 8.35 degrees. Female patients have statistically significant higher LTS and lower PROMs scores than male. Patients with LTS greater than or equal to 8.35 had significantly lower PROMs, indicative of poorer functional and subjective outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that a higher LTS is associated with inferior subjective outcomes following single-bundle ACL reconstruction in long term. The LTS cut-off value of 8.35 degrees could potentially be used as a reference in preoperative planning and patient counseling.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding the relationship between LTS and ACL reconstruction outcomes could inform surgical planning and postoperative management. These findings highlight the need to consider anatomical variances, such as LTS, when assessing patient-specific risks and recovery expectations, contributing to the advancement of personalized care in sports medicine.

External validation of the Norwegian anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction revision prediction model using patients from the STABILITY 1 Trial

PURPOSE

A machine learning-based anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision prediction model has been developed using Norwegian Knee Ligament Register (NKLR) data, but lacks external validation outside Scandinavia. This study aimed to assess the external validity of the NKLR model (https://swastvedt.shinyapps.io/calculator_rev/) using the STABILITY 1 randomized clinical trial (RCT) data set. The hypothesis was that model performance would be similar.

METHODS

The NKLR Cox Lasso model was selected for external validation owing to its superior performance in the original study. STABILITY 1 patients with all five predictors required by the Cox Lasso model were included. The STABILITY 1 RCT was a prospective study which randomized patients to receive either a hamstring tendon autograft (HT) alone or HT plus a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Since all patients in the STABILITY 1 trial received HT ± LET, three configurations were tested: 1: all patients coded as HT, 2: HT + LET group coded as bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, 3: HT + LET group coded as unknown/other graft choice. Model performance was assessed via concordance and calibration.

RESULTS

In total, 591/618 (95.6%) STABILITY 1 patients were eligible for inclusion, with 39 undergoing revisions within 2 years (6.6%). Model performance was best when patients receiving HT + LET were coded as BPTB. Concordance was similar to the original NKLR prediction model for 1- and 2-year revision prediction (STABILITY: 0.71; NKLR: 0.68-0.69). Concordance 95% confidence interval (CI) ranged from 0.63 to 0.79. The model was well calibrated for 1-year prediction while the 2-year prediction demonstrated evidence of miscalibration.

CONCLUSION

When patients in STABILITY 1 who received HT + LET were coded as BPTB in the NKLR prediction model, concordance was similar to the index study. However, due to a wide 95% CI, the true performance of the prediction model with this Canadian and European cohort is unclear and a larger data set is required to definitively determine the external validity. Further, better calibration for 1-year predictions aligns with general prediction modelling challenges over longer periods. While not a large enough sample size to elicit the true accuracy and external validity of the prediction model when applied to North American patients, this analysis provides more support for the notion that HT plus LET performs similarly to BPTB reconstruction. In addition, despite the wide confidence interval, this study suggests optimism regarding the accuracy of the model when applied outside of Scandinavia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, cohort study.

The increased lateral tibial slope may result in inferior long-term clinical outcome after DB-ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine if there is a correlation between lateral tibial slope and long-term clinical results in patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients that received double-bundle ACL reconstruction at a single institution by a single surgeon from January 2011 to December 2014. All the magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed and lateral tibial slopes (LTS) were recorded by an experienced surgeon and rechecked by the other two authors of this study that specialized in orthopedic knee surgery. The relationship between PROMs measurement and lateral tibial slope were analyzed. The patients were then separated into two groups (LTS > 7.4° and < 7.4°) according to the previous study.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were enrolled in this study. All enrolled patients were followed for at least 8 years. The PROMS result were negatively correlated with the lateral tibial slope (p values all < 0.001). The patients with high lateral tibial slope had significantly lower PROMS values (Lysholm 94.26 ± 5.61 vs 80.15 ± 8.28, p = 0.013; IKDC 82.99 ± 4.55 vs 70.09 ± 7.15, p = 0.003; Tegner 9.32 ± 0.95 vs 6.85 ± 1.99, p < 0.001). Finally, the LTS cutoff value between patients with "Good" and "Fair" Lysholm score in our study was 7.55 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high lateral tibial slope may result in inferior long-term subjective outcomes. The using of double-bundle ACL reconstruction along cannot overcome the negative impact caused by steep lateral tibial slope. A lateral tibial slope of 7.55° may be used as a cut-off for a good clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Does posterior tibial slope laterality exist? A matched cohort study between ACL-injured and non-injured knees

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to examine 1) the degree and frequency of laterality in posterior tibial slope (PTS) with control and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury groups and 2) the laterality of PTS between sides of injury and dominant legs in patients with primary ACL injuries.

METHODS

A total of 187 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed noncontact ACL injuries and an age- and sex-matched 1:1 control group were identified. PTS was measured using three different methods (aPTS = anterior PTS, mPTS = middle PTS, pPTS = posterior PTS) on a lateral knee radiograph. PTS of the left and right sides were compared between the patients in the control and ACL-injured groups, and between the injured and non-injured and dominant and non-dominant legs among the patients in the ACL-injured group. The patients with a difference in PTS of ≥ 3° in mPTS were selected. The percentages were compared between left and right between and among both groups, and between the injured and non-injured, and non-dominant and dominant leg, for the ACL group. Multiple regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors influencing the degree of mPTS.

RESULTS

Both control (Right vs Left: aPTS; 9.0 ± 2.5 vs 10.5 ± 3.0, mPTS; 6.6 ± 2.3 vs 8.1 ± 2.7, pPTS; 4.0 ± 2.4 vs 5.6 ± 2.8, respectively, p < 0.01) and ACL injury groups (Right vs Left: aPTS; 10.6 ± 3.0 vs 12.6 ± 2.9, mPTS; 7.6 ± 2.6 vs 9.5 ± 2.6, pPTS; 5.9 ± 3.0 vs 8.0 ± 3.0, respectively, p < 0.01) had a significantly greater PTS on the left than on the right side, and the ACL group had a significantly greater PTS than the control group on both the left and right sides. In the ACL group, PTS was greater on the injured and the non-dominant leg than on the non-injured and the dominant leg. The percentage of patients with a PTS difference of ≥ 3° was significantly greater on the left, injured, and non-dominant leg (95.3% vs 4.7%, 73.8% vs 26.2%, 86.1% vs 13.9%, respectively, p < 0.01). Only the left leg had a significant influence on PTS in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

There was laterality in PTS within control and ACL injury groups, and this information is of benefit for effective treatment of ACL injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Association Between Posterior Tibial Slope and Clinical Outcomes After Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

Background Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is an important risk factor for non-traumatic graft failure and revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. If a tibial posterior slope is an important factor for graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, does it affect clinical outcomes? This study aimed to evaluate the association between PTS and clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Material and methods Patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons in the clinic were evaluated retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were: patients with at least an 18-month follow-up period who were evaluated with the Tegner Lysholm scoring system, aged between 18 and 40 years, with only an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. PTSs were measured from the lateral radiographs of the knees. The patients were divided into two groups with a PTS of 10° or less. Results The mean Tegner Lysholm score was 86.8 ± 8.9. The mean PTS was 9.7° ± 1.5°. In total, 14 and 15 patients had a PTS of above 10° and below 10°, respectively. The mean age and follow-up time of patients were 28.5 ± 5.3 years and 24.6 ± 7.2 months in the group with a PTS of above 10° and 30.2 ± 5.3 years and 24.2 ± 5.18 months in the group with a PTS of below 10°, respectively. Tegner Lysholm scores were 88.2 ± 8.8 and 85.6 ± 9.1 in the group with values above 10° and below 10°, respectively. Statistically, there was no significant difference between the clinical outcomes of both groups. Conclusion PTS does not affect the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the early period.

Posterior Tibial Slope in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery: A Systematic Review

Background

While the literature suggests a correlation between posterior tibial slope and sagittal stability of the knee, there is a lack of consensus relating to how to measure the slope, what a normal slope value would be, and which critical values should guide extra surgical treatment. We performed a systematic literature review looking at the posterior tibial slope and cruciate ligament surgery. Our aims were to define a gold standard measurement technique of posterior tibial slope, as well as determining its normal range and the important values for consideration of adjuncts during cruciate ligament surgery.

Methods

Electronic searches of MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, ScienceDirect, and NICE in June 2020 were completed. Inclusion criteria were original studies in peer-reviewed English language journals. A quality assessment of included studies was completed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) Criteria.

Results

Two-hundred and twenty-one papers were identified; following exclusions 34 papers were included for data collection. The mean MINORS score was 13.8 for non-comparative studies and 20.4 for comparative studies, both indicating fair to good quality studies. A large variation in the posterior tibial slope measurement technique was identified, resulting in a wide range of values reported. A significant variation in slope value also existed between different races, ages and genders.

Conclusion

Cautiously, the authors suggest a normal range of 6-12º, using the proximal tibial axis at 5 and 15 cms below the joint. We suggest 12º as a cut-off value for slope-reducing osteotomy as an adjunct to revision ligament reconstruction.

Risk Factors for Revision or Rerupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rerupture or need for revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a serious complication. Preventive strategies that target the early identification of risk factors are important to reduce the incidence of additional surgery.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate risk factors for revision or rerupture after ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to November 2021 and updated in January 2022. Quantitative, original studies reporting potential adjusted risk factors were included. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 71 studies across 13 countries with a total sample size of 629,120 met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen factors were associated with an increase in the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR: male sex (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.41), younger age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), lower body mass index (BMI) (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06), family history (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.50-4.08), White race (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), higher posterolateral tibial slope (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.26), preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), higher baseline Marx activity level (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), return to a high activity level/sport (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.15-3.57), an ACLR within less than a year after injury (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.32), a concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00), an anteromedial portal or transportal technique (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.22-1.51), hamstring tendon (HT) autografts (vs bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB] autografts) (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40-1.82), allografts (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.65-4.19), and smaller graft diameter (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38). The other factors failed to show an association with an increased risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Male sex, younger age, lower BMI, family history, White race, higher posterolateral tibial slope, preoperative high-grade anterior knee laxity, higher baseline Marx activity level, return to a high activity level/sport, an ACLR within less than a year from injury, a concomitant MCL injury, an anteromedial portal or transportal technique, HT autografts (vs BPTB autografts), allografts, and smaller graft diameter may increase the risk of revision or rerupture after ACLR. Raising awareness and implementing effective preventions/interventions for risk factors are priorities for clinical practitioners to reduce the incidence of revision or rerupture after ACLR.

The reverse fragility index: RCTs reporting non-significant differences in failure rates between hamstring and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts have fragile results

PURPOSE

The reverse fragility index (RFI) is a novel metric to appraise the results of studies reporting statistically non-significant results. The purpose of this study was to determine the statistical robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting non-significant differences in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) graft failure rates, defined as re-rupture/revision ACLR rate, between hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts by calculating RFIs.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs that compared HT to BTB grafts for ACLR through January 2022. Studies reporting non-significant differences in graft re-rupture and revision ACLR rate (n.s.) were included. The RFI, defined as the fewest number of event reversals needed to change the non-significant graft re-rupture/revision outcome to statistically significant (P < 0.05), was recorded for each study. In addition, the number of studies in which the loss to follow-up exceeded the RFI was recorded.

RESULTS

Among the 16 included RCTs, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) sample size was 71 (64-114), and the median (IQR) total number of graft re-rupture/revision ACLR events was 4 (4-6). The median (IQR) graft re-rupture/revision ACLR rate was 4.3% (3.0-6.4) overall, 4.1% (2.6-6.7) in the BTB group, and 5.4% (3.0-6.3) in the HT group. The median (IQR) RFI was 3 (3-4), signifying that a reversal of the outcome in 3 patients in one arm was needed to flip the studies' result from non-significant to statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median (IQR) number of participants lost to follow-up was 11 (3-13), and 13 (81.3%) of the included studies had a loss to follow-up greater than the studies' RFI.

CONCLUSION

The results of RCTs reporting statistically non-significant re-rupture/revision ACLR rates between HT and BTB autografts would become significant if the outcome were reversed in a small number of patients-a number that was less than the loss to follow-up in the majority of studies. Thus, the neutrality of these studies is fragile, and a true statistically significant difference in re-rupture/revision rates may have been undetected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Ceiling Effect of the Combined Norwegian and Danish Knee Ligament Registers Limits Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcome Prediction

BACKGROUND

Clinical tools based on machine learning analysis now exist for outcome prediction after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Relying partly on data volume, the general principle is that more data may lead to improved model accuracy.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to apply machine learning to a combined data set from the Norwegian and Danish knee ligament registers (NKLR and DKRR, respectively), with the aim of producing an algorithm that can predict revision surgery with improved accuracy relative to a previously published model developed using only the NKLR. The hypothesis was that the additional patient data would result in an algorithm that is more accurate.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Machine learning analysis was performed on combined data from the NKLR and DKRR. The primary outcome was the probability of revision ACLR within 1, 2, and 5 years. Data were split randomly into training sets (75%) and test sets (25%). There were 4 machine learning models examined: Cox lasso, random survival forest, gradient boosting, and super learner. Concordance and calibration were calculated for all 4 models.

RESULTS

The data set included 62,955 patients in which 5% underwent a revision surgical procedure with a mean follow-up of 7.6 ± 4.5 years. The 3 nonparametric models (random survival forest, gradient boosting, and super learner) performed best, demonstrating moderate concordance (0.67 [95% CI, 0.64-0.70]), and were well calibrated at 1 and 2 years. Model performance was similar to that of the previously published model (NKLR-only model: concordance, 0.67-0.69; well calibrated).

CONCLUSION

Machine learning analysis of the combined NKLR and DKRR enabled prediction of the revision ACLR risk with moderate accuracy. However, the resulting algorithms were less user-friendly and did not demonstrate superior accuracy in comparison with the previously developed model based on patients from the NKLR alone, despite the analysis of nearly 63,000 patients. This ceiling effect suggests that simply adding more patients to current national knee ligament registers is unlikely to improve predictive capability and may prompt future changes to increase variable inclusion.

Editorial Commentary: Bony Morphology Determines the Extent of Concomitant Injuries in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured Knees

The bony morphology of both tibia and femur has been found to influence the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Quantifying the femoral condylar's sagittal morphology, the lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) has been associated with injuries to the anterolateral knee joint capsule, including the anterolateral ligament in ACL-injured knees. Rotational instability may be in part attributable to femoral anisometry with an increase of the LFCR contributing to increased laxity and risk for ACL ruptures as well as concomitant injuries. While there is currently no surgical treatment available to change the bony morphology of the femur, possibilities such as the addition of a lateral extra-articular tenodesis, adjustment of graft selection, or modification of surgical techniques may mitigate the risk of ACL rerupture in patients with a high LFCR.

Elevated Posterior Tibial Slope Is Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of posterior tibial slope (PTS) with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reinjury following primary ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception through March 1, 2021, to retrieve relevant studies. Comparative studies reporting PTS measurements in a cohort of patients experiencing ACL graft failure versus patients with intact primary ACL reconstruction or studies comparing patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction versus primary ACL reconstruction were included for analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) between groups. The following inclusion criteria were used: English language; full text available; Level I, II, or III evidence; studies in humans; and skeletally mature patients.

RESULTS

After we systematically screened 1,912 studies, 15 studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Radiographic measurements were used in 6 studies reporting medial PTS in 411 ACL failures versus 2808 controls. Patients with ACL failure had significantly greater medial PTS compared with controls (SMD 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.77; P < .001). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used in 9 studies reporting lateral PTS measurements in 641 patients with a failed ACL reconstruction compared with 705 controls. Seven of the MRI studies also measured medial PTS in 552 failures versus 641 controls. Patients with ACL failure had significantly greater lateral PTS on MRI (SMD 0.58; 95% CI 0.13-1.03; P = .012) and medial PTS on MRI (SMD 0.59; 95% CI 0.23-0.96; P = .001) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis demonstrated that patients with elevated PTS on radiographs and MRI are at increased risk for ACL graft failure after primary ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, meta-analysis of Level III studies.

A Cadaveric Anatomical Study of the Relationship between Proximal Tibial Slope and Coronal Plane Deformity

Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) are commonly used to characterize the geometry of proximal tibia and are important considerations in lower extremity realignment procedures and total knee arthroplasty. This study utilized a large cadaveric collection to explore relationships between tibial slope and coronal plane deformity of the tibia. We utilized 462 well-preserved skeletons (924 tibiae), excluding any with fracture or obvious rheumatologic or infectious findings. Custom cards were made with different sized arcs on the bottom surface, so that they could rest on the anterior and posterior aspects of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus of each bone to measure PPTA. Previously measured MPTA values for the same bones were also utilized. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationship between MPTA and medial and lateral PPTAs. The mean age was 56 ± 10 years, with 13% female and 31% African American (remainder Caucasian). The mean MPTA was 87.2 ± 2.4 degrees. The mean medial plateau PPTA was 81.5 ± 3.8 degrees and mean lateral plateau PPTA was 81.3 ± 3.7 degrees. Regression analysis found that MPTA was significantly associated with both medial and lateral PPTAs (standardized betas 0.197 and 0.146, respectively, p < 0.0005 for both). There was a significant correlation between lateral and medial PPTAs (r = 0.435, p = 0.03). The clinical significance of these findings warrants further investigation and emphasizes the importance of carefully assessing the sagittal plane when planning reconstruction of a tibia with varus or valgus deformity, particularly high tibial osteotomies.

Return to Sports: A Risky Business? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Risk Factors for Graft Rupture Following ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The risk of sustaining a graft rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is high. Contributing risk factors are, however, still not clearly identified.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to identify and quantify risk factors for graft rupture after ACLR.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42020140129) based on PRISMA guidelines was performed. MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from inception to September 2021. Prospective and retrospective studies addressing risk factors for graft rupture after ACLR in males/females of all ages were considered. Meta-analyses using a random effect model (effect measure: odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) were performed. The GRADE tool was used to assess evidence quality.

RESULTS

Following full-text screening of 310 relevant papers, 117 were eventually included, incorporating up to 133,000 individuals in each meta-analysis. Higher Tegner activity level (≥ 7 vs < 7) at primary injury (OR 3.91, 95% CI 1.69-9.04), increased tibial slope (degrees) (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.26-3.86), lower psychological readiness to return to sport (RTS) (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.32-3.61), early surgery (< 12 vs ≥ 12 months) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.58-2.22), RTS (pre-injury level) (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.21-2.91) and family history of ACL injury (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.34-2.31) were all associated with increased odds of graft rupture. Higher age (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.59), female sex (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.98), fewer self-reported knee symptoms pre-reconstruction (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95) and concomitant cartilage injuries (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.79) instead decreased the odds. Meta-analysis revealed no association between body mass index, smoking, joint laxity, RTS time, knee kinematics, muscle strength or hop performance and graft rupture.

CONCLUSION

Conspicuous risk factors for graft rupture were mainly sports and hereditary related. Few studies investigated function-related modifiable factors or included sports exposure data.

Primary surgery versus primary rehabilitation for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a living systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Compare the effectiveness of primarily surgical versus primarily rehabilitative management for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.

DESIGN

Living systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Six databases, six trial registries and prior systematic reviews. Forward and backward citation tracking was employed.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that compared primary reconstructive surgery and primary rehabilitative treatment with or without optional reconstructive surgery.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Bayesian random effects meta-analysis with empirical priors for the OR and standardised mean difference and 95% credible intervals (CrI), Cochrane RoB2, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to judge the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Of 9514 records, 9 reports of three studies (320 participants in total) were included. No clinically important differences were observed at any follow-up for self-reported knee function (low to very low certainty of evidence). For radiological knee osteoarthritis, we found no effect at very low certainty of evidence in the long term (OR (95% CrI): 1.45 (0.30 to 5.17), two studies). Meniscal damage showed no effect at low certainty of evidence (OR: 0.85 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.62); one study) in the long term. No differences were observed between treatments for any other secondary outcome. Three ongoing randomised controlled trials were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

There is low to very low certainty of evidence that primary rehabilitation with optional surgical reconstruction results in similar outcome measures as early surgical reconstruction for ACL rupture. The findings challenge a historical paradigm that anatomic instability should be addressed with primary surgical stabilisation to provide optimal outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021256537.

Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent literature was reviewed to identify and summarize the etiology of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) failure reported.

METHODS

The databases Embase, PubMed, and Medline were searched on March 10, 2022, for English-language, clinical studies that reported on the etiology of failure of primary ACLR. The studies were systematically screened in duplicate and data abstracted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Forty-three studies were identified that reported mode of failure in primary ACLR. Trauma (43 studies), technical error (11 studies), and biology (9 studies) remain the most reported etiologies of ACLR failure. A combination of causes was listed in three studies. No reported cause or "other" was listed in 22 studies. Many clinical studies fail to report etiology of ACLR failure. Level of detail provided regarding mode of failure varies widely. Trauma, technical error, and biological failure remain the leading etiologies of ACLR failure reported in recent literature. Technical error is likely underreported and a contributing factor in traumatic failures.

Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy for Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: State of the Art

The sagittal anatomy of the proximal tibia has a bearing on the forces exerted on the cruciate ligaments. A high posterior tibial slope is now a well-known risk factor causing failure of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. The posterior slope can be calculated on short or full-length radiographs, MRI scans, or three-dimensional CT scans. Reducing the slope surgically by a sagittal tibial osteotomy is biomechanically protective for the ACL graft. An anterior closing wedge osteotomy may be contemplated when the lateral tibial slope is greater than 12°, in the setting of ACL reconstruction failure(s). Careful surgical planning to calculate the correction, taking into account knee hyperextension and patella height, is critical to avoid complications. It can be done above, at, or below the tibial tuberosity level. A transtuberosity correction can be done with or without a tibial tubercle osteotomy. This complex surgery can be conducted safely by meticulous execution to protect the posterior hinge and neurovascular structures and achieving stable fixation with staples. The limited literature available justifies the usage of anterior closing wedge osteotomy in appropriately selected patients.

An increased posterior tibial slope is associated with a higher risk of graft failure following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The posterior tibial slope (PTS) is considered a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, the influence of PTS on graft failure following ACL reconstruction remains relatively unknown. Therefore, this systematic review was conducted to investigate whether PTS could be a potential risk factor for graft failure after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, and Wanfang Database were comprehensively searched from inception to March 31, 2021. Observational studies reporting the associations of medial tibial plateau slope (MTPS) or lateral tibial plateau slope (LTPS) with graft failure after ACL reconstruction were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty studies involving 12 case-control studies, 4 retrospective studies and 4 cross-sectional studies including 5326 patients met the final inclusion criteria. The high heterogeneity and the characteristics of nonrandomized controlled trials limited data synthesis. Fifteen of the 20 included studies detected a significant association between increased PTS and ACL graft failure, while 5 studies concluded that increased PTS was not associated with ACL graft failure. Ten studies suggested that MTPS is associated with ACL graft failure, and six studies suggested that LTPS is associated with ACL graft failure. The mean MTPS values for nonfailure group ranged from 3.5° ± 2.5° to 14.4° ± 2.8°. For the graft failure group, MTPS ranged from 4.71° ± 2.41° to 17.2° ± 2.2°. The mean LTPS values for nonfailure group ranged from 2.9° ± 2.1° to 11.9° ± 3.0°. For the graft failure group, LTPS ranged from 5.5° ± 3.0° to 13.3° ± 3.0°. The reported PTS values that caused ACL graft failure was greater than 7.4° to 17°.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current clinical evidence, increased PTS is associated with a higher risk of ACL graft failure after ACL reconstruction. Despite various methods of measuring PTS have high reliability, there is still vast disagreement in the actual value of PTS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Posterior Tibial Slope in Patients With Torn ACL Reconstruction Grafts Compared With Primary Tear or Native ACL: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background:

Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and failure of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) grafts.

Purpose:

The purpose was to conduct a systematic review of literature on PTS measurements and to conduct a meta-analysis of comparable PTS measurements based on a patient’s ACL status. It was hypothesized that patients with torn ACLR grafts would have significantly larger medial and lateral PTS compared with patients with native ACLs or those who underwent primary ACLR.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included were studies that reported medial and/or lateral PTS measurements, those that reported PTS measurements based on ACL status (ie, intact ACL, primary ACL tear, failed ipsilateral ACLR, or revision ACLR), and those that reported their specific PTS measurement technique. Average PTS measurements, measurement location (medial or lateral tibial plateau) and technique, imaging modality used, and ACL status were extracted from each study. Data were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models, and results were compared using the Altman interaction test.

Results:

The literature search identified 1705 studies, of which 82 (N = 12,971 patients) were included. There were 4028 patients in the intact ACL group (31%), 7405 in the primary ACLR group (57%), and 1538 in the failed ACLR group (12%). Measurements were obtained from lateral radiographs in 31 studies (38%), from magnetic resonance imaging in 47 studies (57%), and from computed tomography in 4 studies (5%). The failed ACLR group had a significantly larger lateral PTS (9.55°; 95% CI, 8.47°-10.63°) than either the primary ACL tear (7.13°; 95% CI, 6.58°-7.67°) or intact ACL (5.57°; 95% CI, 5.03°-6.11°) groups (P < .001 for both). The failed ACLR group also had a significantly larger medial PTS (9.05°; 95% CI, 7.80°-10.30°) than the primary (6.24°; 95% CI, 5.71°-6.78°) or intact ACL (6.28°; 95% CI, 5.21°-7.35°) groups (P < .001 for both).

Conclusion:

Both lateral and medial PTS measurements were greater in patients who had failed previous ACLR than those with a primary ACL tear or an intact native ACL. The lateral PTS of patients with primary ACL tears was greater than those with an intact native ACL.

Minimizing the risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes. A narrative review of the current evidence

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is one of the most common sport-related injuries and the request for ACL reconstructions is increasing nowadays. Unfortunately, ACL graft failures are reported in up to 34.2% in athletes, representing a traumatic and career-threatening event. It can be convenient to understand the various risk factors for ACL failure, in order to properly inform the patients about the expected outcomes and to minimize the chance of poor results. In literature, a multitude of studies have been performed on the failure risks after ACL reconstruction, but the huge amount of data may generate much confusion.The aim of this review is to resume the data collected from literature on the risk of graft failure after ACL reconstruction in athletes, focusing on the following three key points: individuate the predisposing factors to ACL reconstruction failure, analyze surgical aspects which may have significant impact on outcomes, highlight the current criteria regarding safe return to sport after ACL reconstruction.

Ideal Combination of Anatomic Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Positions for Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Background:

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is preferred over nonanatomic ACLR. However, there is no consensus on which point the tunnels should be positioned among the broad anatomic footprints.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

To identify the ideal combination of tibial and femoral tunnel positions according to the femoral and tibial footprints of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) anterior cruciate ligament bundles. It was hypothesized that patients with anteromedially positioned tunnels would have better clinical scores, knee joint stability, and graft signal intensity on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) than those with posterolaterally positioned tunnels.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 119 patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACLR with a hamstring autograft from July 2013 to September 2018 were retrospectively investigated. Included were patients with clinical scores and knee joint stability test results at 2-year follow-up and postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography and 1-year postoperative MRI findings. The cohort was divided into 4 groups, named according to the bundle positions in the tibial and femoral tunnels: AM-AM (n = 33), AM-PL (n = 26), PL-AM (n = 29), and PL-PL (n = 31).

Results:

There were no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups in preoperative demographic data or postoperative clinical scores (Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores); knee joint stability (anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests and Telos stress radiographic measurement of the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation); graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI; or graft failure.

Conclusion:

No significant differences in clinical scores, knee joint stability, or graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI were identified between the patients with anteromedially and posterolaterally positioned tunnels.

The Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on the Risk of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) later experience graft failure. Some studies suggest an association between a steep posterior tibial slope (PTS) and graft failure.

PURPOSE

To examine the PTS in a large cohort of patients about to undergo ACLR and to determine whether a steep PTS is associated with later revision surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a cohort undergoing isolated ACLR between 2002 and 2012 (with 8-19 years of follow-up) was conducted. Preoperative sagittal radiographs of knees in full extension were used for measurements of the PTS. There were 2 independent examiners who performed repeated measurements to assess the reliability of the method. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the PTS in the groups with and without later revision surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 728 patients, with a mean age of 28 years at the time of surgery, were included. Overall, 10% (n = 76) underwent revision surgery during the observation period. The group of injured knees had a significantly steeper PTS compared with the group of uninjured knees (9.5° vs 8.7°, respectively; P < .05). The mean PTS in the no revision group was 9.5° compared with 9.3° in the revision group (not significant). Dichotomized testing of revision rates related to PTS cutoff values of ≥10°, ≥12°, ≥14°, ≥16°, and ≥18° showed no association of PTS steepness (not significant) to graft failure. Patients with revision were younger than the ones without (mean age, 24 ± 8 vs 29 ± 10 years, respectively) and had a shorter time from injury to ACLR (mean, 14 ± 27 vs 24 ± 44 months, respectively) as well as a smaller graft size (8.2 vs 8.4 mm, respectively; P = .040).

CONCLUSION

The current study did not find any association between a steep PTS measured on lateral knee radiographs and revision ACL surgery. However, a steeper PTS was seen in the group of injured knees compared with the group of uninjured (contralateral) knees. Independent of the PTS, younger patients, those with a shorter time from injury to surgery, and those with a smaller graft size were found to undergo revision surgery more often.

Graft Survivorship After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on Tibial Slope

BACKGROUND

Increased tibial slope (TS) is believed to be a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Increased TS may also promote graft insufficiency after ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To delineate the relationship between TS and single as well as multiple graft insufficiencies after ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence 3.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 519 patients who had sustained ACL graft insufficiency after primary or revision ACL reconstruction (1 graft insufficiency, group A; 2 graft insufficiencies, group B; and ≥3 graft insufficiencies, group C). In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted in 63 patients who received all surgical interventions by 2 specialized high-volume, single-center ACL surgeons. TS was measured by an observer with >10 years of training using lateral knee radiographs, and intrarater reliability was performed. Multiple logistic and univariate Cox regression was used to assess the contribution of covariates (TS, age, sex, and bilateral ACL injury) on repeated graft insufficiency and graft survival.

RESULTS

The study included 347 patients, 119 female and 228 male, who were 24 ± 9 years of age at their first surgery (group A, n = 260; group B, n = 62; group C, n = 25). Mean TS was 9.8°± 2.7° (range, 3°-18°). TS produced the highest adjusted odds ratio (1.73) of all covariates for repeated graft insufficiency. A significant correlation was found between TS and the number of graft insufficiencies (r = 0.48; P < .0001). TS was significantly lower in group A (9.0°± 2.3°) compared with group B (12.1°± 2.5°; P < .0001) and group C (12.0°± 2.6°; P < .0001). A significant correlation was seen between the TS and age at index ACL tear (r = -0.12; P = .02) as well as time to graft insufficiency (r = -0.12; P = .02). A TS ≥12° had an odds ratio of 11.6 for repeated ACL graft insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

The current results indicate that patients with a markedly increased TS were at risk of early and repeated graft insufficiency after ACL reconstruction. Because the TS is rarely accounted for in primary and revision ACLR, isolated soft tissue procedures only incompletely address recurrent graft insufficiency in this subset of patients.

Lateral posterior tibial slope and length of the tendon within the tibial tunnel are independent factors to predict tibial tunnel widening following anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study aimed to conduct a multivariate analysis to identify independent factors that predict tibial tunnel widening (TW) after anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts.

METHODS

In total, 103 patients who underwent ACL reconstructions using BPTB grafts were included. Tunnel aperture area was measured using three-dimensional computed tomography 1 week and 1 year postoperatively, and the tibial TW was calculated. The patients were divided into group S comprising 58 patients who had tibial TW < 30% and group L comprising 45 patients who had tibial TW > 30%, retrospectively. Using univariate analyses, age, gender, body mass index, Tegner activity scale, the time between injury and surgery, tibial tunnel location, tibial tunnel angle, medial posterior tibial slope, lateral posterior tibial slope, and length of the tendon in the tibial tunnel were compared between two groups. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to reveal the independent risk factors for the tibial TW among preoperative demographic factors and radiographic parameters that correlated with the tibial TW in the univariate analyses.

RESULTS

Compared with those at 1 week postoperatively, mean tibial tunnel aperture areas were increased by 30.3% ± 26.8% when measured at 1 year postoperatively. The lateral posterior tibial slope was significantly larger (p < 0.001), and the length of the tendon within the tibial tunnel was significantly longer in group L than that in group S (p = 0.03) in the univariate analyses. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the increase in lateral posterior tibial slope (p = 0.001) and the length of the tendon within the tibial tunnel (p = 0.03) were predictors of the tibial TW.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that increased lateral posterior tibial slope and a longer tendinous portion within the tibial tunnel were independent factors that predicted the tibial TW following anatomical ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Reliability of Plain Radiographs Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Measure Tibial Slope in Sports Medicine Patients: Can They Be Used Interchangeably?

Background:

The slope of the tibial plateau has been proposed as a reason for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Purpose:

To evaluate the interobserver reliability of measurements of tibial slope on radiographs versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and to assess whether the modalities can be used interchangeably for this purpose.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This retrospective study included 81 patients aged 18 to 30 years who were evaluated in a sports medicine setting for knee pain and who had lateral knee radiographs as well as knee MRI scans on file. Medial and lateral tibial plateau slope measurements were made by 3 blinded reviewers from the radiographs and MRI scans using graphic overlay software. The paired t test was used to compare measurements of the medial tibial plateau slope (MTPS) and lateral tibial plateau slope (LTPS) from radiographs and MRI scans. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine intra- and interobserver reliability of measurements within each imaging modality, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship between measurements on radiographs versus MRI scans.

Results:

Imaging from 81 patients were included. The average MTPS was significantly larger on radiographs compared with MRI scans (8.7° ± 3.6° vs 3.7° ± 3.4°; P < .001), and the average LTPS was also significantly larger on radiographs compared with MRI scans (7.9° ± 3.4° vs 5.7° ± 3.7°; P < .001). ICC values indicated good to excellent intraobserver agreement for all imaging modalities (ICC, 0.81-0.97; P ≤ .009). The ICCs for interobserver reliability of MTPS and LTPS measurements were 0.92 and 0.85 for radiographs, 0.87 and 0.83 for MRI based off the subchondral bone, and 0.86 and 0.71 for MRI based off the cartilage, respectively (P < .001). Medium correlation was noted between radiographic and MRI measurements; Pearson correlation coefficients for radiographic versus subchondral MRI measurements were 0.30 and 0.37 for MTPS and LTPS, respectively.

Conclusion:

The average MTPS and LTPS were significantly larger on radiographs compared with MRI scans. Although tibial slope measurements using radiography and those using MRI are reliable between individuals, the measurements from radiographs and MRI scans cannot be used interchangeably, and caution should be used when interpreting and comparing studies using measurements of the tibial slope.

Medial and Lateral Posterior Tibial Slope Are Independent Risk Factors for Noncontact ACL Injury in Both Men and Women

Background:

Higher posterior tibial slope (PTS) is a risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in men and women. The individual contribution of the lateral (LPTS) and medial (MPTS) slope has not yet been investigated.

Purpose:

To determine whether either the LPTS or the MPTS is an independent risk factor for ACL injury, and to determine sex-specific differences between patients with ACL-deficient and ACL-intact knees.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

We reviewed knee magnetic resonance (MR) images performed on ACL-deficient and ACL-intact knees between January 2018 and June 2020 at a single institution. Inclusion criteria were isolated ACL injury and noncontact mechanism (ACL-deficient group) and nonspecific knee pain and no history of injury (ACL-intact group). Exclusion criteria for both groups were the following: previous knee surgery; meniscal, collateral ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, or multiligamentous injuries; radiological evidence of osteoarthritis; and chondral damage on the tibia. The MR images were used to establish the posterior bony slope at 25%, 50%, and 75% from the medial and/or lateral border of the tibial plateau with respect to the proximal tibial anatomic axis. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine differences in PTS at the 25%, 50%, and 75% distances for the medial and lateral tibial plateau between the groups and between the sexes.

Results:

Overall, 325 images were included (mean age, 36.1 ± 11.1 years; 142 ACL-deficient images [82 men and 60 women]; 183 ACL-intact images [112 men and 71 women]). MPTS and LPTS were significantly higher at 25%, 50%, and 75% in the ACL-deficient group (range, –2.7° to –5.7°) compared with the ACL-intact group (range, –2.1° to 1.5°; P = .00001). Similarly, MPTS and LPTS were significantly different in men versus women (P = .00001). ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences in PTS between men and women for all measures (MPTS, LPTS, ACL-deficient, ACL-intact; P = .68).

Conclusion:

The study results demonstrated that higher MPTS and LPTS is a potential risk factor for ACL injury in both men and women. However, despite being highly statistically significant, the differences between groups and sexes were small and may not be clinically relevant.

[Influence of lateral posterior tibial slope on tibial tunnel expansion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To investigate the influence of lateral posterior tibial slope (LPTS) on tibial tunnel expansion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the effect of tibial tunnel expansion on knee joint function.

Methods

A clinical data of 52 patients with ACL rupture, who underwent arthroscopic anatomical single-bundle reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2019, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 20 females with an average age of 34.3 years (range, 14-64 years). There were 22 cases of left knee and 30 cases of right knee. The time from injury to operation ranged from 7 to 30 days, with an average of 15.9 days. The knee function was evaluated by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm score before operation and at 3 and 6 months after operation. At 3 and 6 months after operation, the LPTS and the width of exit, middle segment, entrance, and 2 cm from the exit of the articular surface of the tibial tunnel were measured based on MRI. The expansion of tibial tunnel was calculated and graded (degrees 0-3). According to LPTS, the patients were divided into group A (<6.0°), group B (6°-12°), and group C (>12°), and the difference in the expansion of tibial tunnel between groups was compared.

Results

All the 52 patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 7.1 months). The IKDC and Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months after operation were significantly different from those before operation ( P<0.05); and the difference of knee scores between 3 and 6 months after operation was significant ( P<0.05). The tibial tunnel expanded after operation, and the relative expansion at the exit and the middle segment showed significant difference between 3 months and 6 months after operation ( P<0.05). The expansion degree of tibial tunnel was rated as degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 28 cases, degree 2 in 16 cases, and degree 3 in 3 cases at 3 months after operation, and degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 20 cases, degree 2 in 25 cases, and degree 3 in 2 cases at 6 months after operation. There was no significant difference in IKDC and Lysholm scores between patients with different expansion degrees of tibial tunnels ( P>0.05). The LPTS of 52 patients ranged from -0.8° to 18.7° (mean, 10.6°); there were 7 cases in group A, 24 cases in group B, and 21 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender, preoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores, and initial width of tibial tunnel between groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative expansion of tibial tunnel at exit and middle segment between groups at 3 months after operation ( P>0.05), and there was significant difference at 6 months after operation ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

After anatomical single-bundle reconstruction of ACL, the tibial tunnel would expand to some extent in a short time. LPTS had a significant effect on tibial tunnel expansion, and the larger the angle was, the more obvious the expansion of the proximal tibial tunnel was. However, early knee function is not affected by tibial tunnel expansion.

Femur originated genu varum in a patient with symptomatic ACL deficiency: a case report and review of literature

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury may be associated with genu varum. There are a few indications in which the varus deformity can be corrected at the time of ACL reconstruction. However, as the genu varum originates mostly from the tibia and the simultaneous presence of ACL deficiency and femur originated genu varum is uncommon, only a few papers have described their management for ACL deficient patients with femur originated genu varum.

Case presentation

A young patient visited our clinic with a complaint of right knee pain and giving way. Further work up revealed a full mid substance ACL tear, mild medial knee osteoarthritis and femur originated genu varum of his right knee. He was managed with simultaneous ACL reconstruction and distal femoral valgus osteotomy.

Conclusions

Any corrective osteotomy for genu varum should be performed at center of rotation angle. Isolated ACL reconstruction in patients with simultaneous ACL deficiency and genu varum may hasten the knee degeneration.

Level of evidence

IV

Age, activity level and meniscus injury, but not tear location, tibial slope or anterolateral ligament injury predict coping with anterior cruciate ligament injury

INTRODUCTION

Early recognition of potential predictors on the success of conservative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is important, as appropriate treatment can be applied to each individual patient. The goal of this study is to assess the patient demographic and radiological parameters that predict coping with ACL injuries.

METHODS

All patients presenting with a complete ACL injury between 2014 and 2018 at our clinic were included. The role of patient demographics (age, gender, activity level, meniscus injury and time from injury to clinic), and ACL tear location, bone bruises, tibial slope, and anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury were assessed on the success of conservative treatment using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (32%) were copers and 141 (68%) were non-copers. Univariate analysis showed that copers were significantly older (40 vs. 27 years, P < 0.001), had lower preinjury activity level (Tegner 5.7 vs. 6.5, P < 0.001) and less often lateral meniscus tears (16% vs. 5%, P = 0.019) but not medial meniscus tears (17% vs. 14%, P = 0.609) than non-copers. Multivariate analysis revealed that increasing age (P < 0.001), Tegner level ≤ 6 (P = 0.003) and no meniscus injury (P = 0.045) were independent predictors of coping with ACL deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, participation in lower activity sports levels and absence of meniscus injury were predictive of coping with ACL deficiency, whereas there was no such role for tear location, tibial slope, lateral bone bruise presence, ALL injury or gender. These findings might help to identify potential copers and guide surgeons early in the optimal treatment for patients with ACL injury.

Enlarged tibial eminence may be a protective factor of anterior cruciate ligament

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a primary stabilizer of the knee and constrains joint motion, and its injury is very common in clinic. There are many studies on the risk factors of ACL injury such as the ACL diameter, intercondylar notch width index (NWI), sagittal condylar shape, tibial posterior slope, tibia eminence size and so on. Large amount of research data has confirmed that all above are closely related to ACL injury. Among them the morphological characteristics of femoral condyle and tibial plateau are closely related to ACL injury. For example the tibial eminence, which is the hot topic of recent research. Whether or how does it relate to ACL injury has draw much interest of researchers. Since the tibial eminence and the ACL are both located in the intercondylar notch and adjacent to each other, we hypothesize the size of the tibial eminence may relate to the rupture of ACL. For there is report have found that reduced medial tibial eminence was associated with ACL injury, we suggest a hypothesis that enlarged tibia eminence may be a protective factor of ACL.

Difference in sex and the effect of a dominant lower extremity in the posterior tibial slope angle in healthy Japanese subjects

Background/objective

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are prone to re-injury, and it is crucial to prevent the primary injury. One of the anatomical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury is the posterior tibial slope angle. Investigating the characteristics of healthy individuals with respect to the posterior tibial slope angle is important to elucidate the risk of developing anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics related to sex and of the posterior tibial slope angle in healthy Japanese subjects, and the effect of the dominant lower extremity.

Methods

Sixty-two knees of 31 healthy Japanese college students (15 males and 16 females) were included in this study. Magnetic resonance images of both knee joints of the subjects were measured using a 0.3 T scanner. The medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles were measured from the obtained magnetic resonance images. Magnetic resonance images of the knee joint of the dominant lower extremity were used to compare differences in sexes between the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles. Bilateral knee joint magnetic resonance images were used to compare the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities. Independent t-tests were used to compare the differences regarding sex in the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles and to compare the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities.

Results

A comparison of the mean lateral posterior tibial slope angle showed that males had a 8.8 ± 1.7° angle, while females had a 10.3 ± 2.2° angle, which was significantly greater (p = 0.047). There was no significant difference comparing the posterior tibial slope angle between the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities (p = 0.430).

Conclusions

From the result of this study, the lateral posterior tibial slope angle was significantly higher in the female group than in the male group. However, both the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles were found to be unaffected by the dominant lower extremity.

Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique

INTRODUCTION

Factors for graft failure after trans-tibial (TT) ACL reconstruction, including anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury and degree of synovialization, remain unclear. This study is to evaluate the risk factors for graft failures after TT ACL reconstruction including ALL injury and synovialization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total 391 patients who underwent primary TT ACL reconstruction were included. Failure was defined as greater than grade 2 laxity on the Lachman or pivot shift tests or 5 mm of anterior translation on stress radiograph. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 31 patients with failure were categorized as group 1 and 89 patients without failure were categorized as group 2. Chi-square test and Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 64 patients had ALL injuries (53.3%), 58 had medial meniscal (MM) tears (48.3%), and 62 had lateral meniscal (LM) tears (51.6%). Ninety-three patients (77.5%) had acute injuries and 27 had chronic injuries as per 6-weeks duration. Significant risk factors for failure were LM tear (hazard ratio [HR], 4.018; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.677-9.629; p = 0.002), chronicity (HR, 6.812; 95% CI 2.758-16.824; p = 0.000), presence of ALL injury (HR, 3.655; 95% CI 1.442-9.265; p = 0.006), and poor synovialization (HR, 3.134; 95% CI 1.298-7.566; p = 0.011) in Cox proportional hazard analysis. If combined MM and LM tears were found, an increased risk of failure was also identified (combined tears: HR, 3.951; 95% CI 1.754-8.901; p = 0.001/preoperative high-grade laxity: HR, 4.546; 95% CI 1.875-11.02; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Chronic ACL injuries, meniscus tear, preoperative ALL injuries, preoperative high-grade laxity and poor synovialization are significant risk factors. Therefore, these factors should be carefully assessed and properly treated in TT ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective cohort study.

Sagittal knee kinematics in relation with the posterior tibia slope during jump landing after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

An increased posterior tibia plateau angle is associated with increased risk for anterior cruciate ligament injury and re-rupture after reconstruction. The aims of this study were to determine whether the tibia plateau angle correlates with dynamic anterior tibia translation (ATT) after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and whether the tibia plateau angle correlates with aspects of knee kinematics and kinetics during jump landing.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft hamstring tendon were included. Knee flexion angle and knee extension moment during single leg hops for distance were determined using a motion capture system and the dynamic ATT with its embedded method. The medial and lateral posterior tibia plateau angle were measured using MRI. Moreover, passive ATT was measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer.

Results

A weak negative correlation was found between the maximal dynamic ATT and the medial tibia plateau angle (p = 0.028, r = − 0.36) and between the maximal knee flexion angle and the lateral tibia plateau angle (p = 0.025, r = − 0.37) during landing. Patients with a smaller lateral tibia plateau angle show larger maximal knee flexion angle during landing than the patients with larger lateral tibia plateau angle. Also, the lateral tibia plateau angle is associated the amount of with muscle activity.

Conclusion

The posterior medical tibia plateau angle is associated with dynamic ATT. The maximal knee flexion angle and muscle activity are associated with the posterior lateral tibia plateau angle.

Level of evidence

III

High variability of tibial slope measurement methods in daily clinical practice: Comparisons between measurements on lateral radiograph, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Tibial slope measurements are important in guiding clinical decisions in the field of orthopedic surgery. However, there are multiple techniques across different medical imaging modalities and little is known about its impact on result and validity of the measurement. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare tibial slope measurements from lateral radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans in order to better assess the clinical significance of measured tibial slope values.

METHODS

Twenty patients with complete medical imaging (lateral radiographs, MRI, CT scans) undergoing anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery were included. The tibial slope of the medial and lateral plateau were measured and compared using the methods of Dejour et al. and Utzschneider et al. on lateral radiographs, by Hudek et al. and Hashemi et al. on MRI and CT scans, and by Zhang et al. on three-dimensional reconstructions of CT scans.

RESULTS

Mean differences up to 5.4 ± 2.8° (P < 0.05) and 4.9 ± 2.6° (P < 0.05) between different measurement methods were found for the medial and lateral tibial slope, respectively. Depending on how the tibial shaft axis was defined, significant differences between the respective measurement methods and a relevant degree of variability were identified. Pearson correlation coefficients between the measurement methods varied distinctly from moderate to strong correlations.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibial slope measurements have a high degree of variability and inaccuracy between imaging modalities and different measurement methods. Care must be taken when deciding on indications based on individual modality measurements.

The effect of meniscal repair on strength deficits 6 months after ACL reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be accompanied by meniscal lesions. Generally, the rehabilitation protocols are altered by meniscal repair. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of meniscal repair on the early recovery of thigh muscle strength in ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a matched cohort analysis of n = 122 isolated ACLR (CON) compared to n = 61 ACLR with meniscal repair (ACLR + MR). The subgroups of meniscal repair consisted of 30 patients who had undergone medial meniscus repairs (MM), 19 lateral meniscus repairs (LM) and 12 repairs of medial and lateral meniscus (BM). Isokinetic strength measurement was performed pre-operatively and 6 months post-surgery to perform a cross-sectional and a longitudinal analysis. All injuries were unilateral, and the outcome measures were compared to the non-affected contralateral leg.

RESULTS

Six months postoperatively overall there is no significant difference between the groups (extension strength MR 82% vs. CON 85% and flexion strength 86% vs. 88%, resp.). Subgroup analysis showed that medial repairs exhibit a comparable leg symmetry while lateral repairs performed worse with leg symmetry being 76% in extension and 81% in flexion strength. Patients undergoing BM repair performed in between lateral and medial repairs (82% extension, 86% flexion).

CONCLUSION

Generally, meniscal repair in conjunction with ACLR does not significantly alter the recovery of limb symmetry in strength at 6 months postoperatively. Interestingly, medial repairs seem to perform superior to lateral meniscal repair and repair of both menisci. Since the recovery of symmetric strength is a major factor in rehabilitation testing, these results will help to advise surgeons on appropriate rehabilitation protocols and setting realistic goals for the injured athlete.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Assessment of the tibial slope is highly dependent on the type and accuracy of the preceding acquisition

BACKGROUND

Precise measurement of the tibial slope (TS) is crucial for realignment surgery, ligament reconstruction, and arthroplasty. However, there is little consensus on the ideal assessment. It was hypothesized that the tibial slope changes according to the acquisition technique and both tibial length as well as femoral rotation serve as potential confounders.

METHODS

104 patients (37 women, 67 men; range 12-66 years) were retrospectively selected, of which all patients underwent a 1.5-Tesla MRI and either additional standard lateral radiographs (SLR, n = 52) or posterior stress radiographs (PSR, n = 52) of the index knee. Two blinded observers evaluated the medial tibial slope as the medial TS is primarily used in clinical practice. Additionally, the length of the diaphyseal axis and the extent of radiographic malrotation were measured.

RESULTS

Mean TS on MRI was significantly lower compared to radiographs (4.2° ± 2.9° vs. 9.1° ± 3.6°; p < 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between MRI and PSR (p < 0.0001 with r = 0.7), but not with SLR (p = 0.93 with r = 0.24). Tibial length was a significant predictor for the difference between MRI and SLR (regression coefficient ß = - 0.03; p = 0.035), yet not between MRI and PSR (ß = - 0.003; p = 0.9). Femoral rotation proved to be a significant predictor for the agreement between both observers (PSR: ß = 0.14; p = 0.001 and SLR: ß = 0.08; p = 0.04). ICC indicated a high interrater agreement for the radiographic assessment (ICC ≥ 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a substantial variance between MRI and radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. However, as MRI assessment is time-consuming and requires specialized software, instrumented radiographs might be an alternative. Due care has to be taken to ensure that radiographs contain a sufficient tibial length, and femoral rotation is avoided.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 4.

The Association Between Tibial Slope and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients ≤21 Years Old: A Matched Case-Control Study Including 317 Revisions

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that tibial slope may play a role in revision risk after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, prior studies are inconsistent.

PURPOSE

To determine (1) whether there is a difference in lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS) or medial tibial posterior slope (MTPS) between patients undergoing revised ACLR and those not requiring revision and (2) whether the medial-to-lateral slope difference is different between these 2 groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We conducted a matched case-control study (2006-2015). Cases were patients aged ≤21 years who underwent revision surgery after primary unilateral ACLR; controls were patients aged ≤21 years without revision who were identified from the same source population. Controls were matched to cases by age, sex, body mass index, race, graft type, femoral fixation device, and post-ACLR follow-up time. Tibial slope measurements were made by a single blinded reviewer using magnetic resonance imaging. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

No difference was observed between revised and nonrevised ACLR groups for LTPS (median: 6° vs 6°, P = .973) or MTPS (median: 4° vs 5°, P = .281). Furthermore, no difference was found for medial-to-lateral slope difference (median: -1 vs -1, P = .289). A greater proportion of patients with revised ACLR had an LTPS ≥12° (7.6% vs 3.8%) and ≥13° (4.7% vs 1.3%); however, this was not statistically significant after accounting for multiple testing.

CONCLUSION

We failed to observe an association between revision ACLR surgery and LTPS, MTPS, or medial-to-lateral slope difference. However, there was a greater proportion of patients in the revision ACLR group with an LTPS ≥12°, suggesting that a minority of patients who have more extreme values of LTPS have a higher revision risk after primary ACLR. A future cohort study evaluating the angle that best differentiates patients at highest risk for revision is needed.

Multivariable analysis of anatomic risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury in active individuals

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare the morphometric differences between patients with or without anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, and identify the anatomic risk factors associated with ACL injury in active individuals.

METHODS

The knee joint magnetic resonance images (MRI) of 100 subjects were included in this study. Data from the ACL-injured group (50 patients) and matched controls (50 subjects) were obtained from the same hospital. These data were analyzed by univariable analysis or multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis to examine the effects of the following variables on the risk of suffering ACL injury for the first time: TT-TG distance, medial and lateral tibial slope, intercondylar notch width and depth, femur condylar width, lateral femoral condylar depth, notch width index (NWI), notch shape index (NSI), notch depth index (NDI), and cross-sectional area (CSA).

RESULTS

In the univariable analysis, the ACL-injured group had a larger TT-TG distance, increased medial and lateral tibial slope, narrower intercondylar notch width, deeper lateral femoral condylar depth, lesser NWI and NSI, and CSA when compared with the control group (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant between-group differences in intercondylar notch depth (P = 0.174), femur condylar width (P = 0.797), and NDI (P = 0.436). The multivariable analysis revealed that TT-TG distance [odds ratio (OR) = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.04-1.81, P = 0.028], medial tibial slope (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.02-1.66, P = 0.036) and NWI (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.24-0.91, P = 0.025) had significant multivariable associations with the sole independent risk of ACL injury.

CONCLUSION

Larger TT-TG distance, increased MTS, and lesser NWI are independent anatomic risk factors for active individuals with ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study; Level of Evidence, III.