The effect of new preoperative preparation method compared to conventional method in complex acetabular fractures: minimum 2-year follow-up

Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional-Printed Orthopedic Implants and Surgical Devices Are Potential Alternatives to Conventional Technology But Require Additional Characterization

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) printing allows anatomical models, guides, and implants to be easily customized to individual patients. Three-dimensional-printed devices can be used for a number of purposes in the medical field, yet there is a lack of data on the implementation of 3D-printed patient-specific implants and surgical guides in orthopedics. The objective of this review of the literature was to summarize the implementation of 3D printing in orthopedic surgery and identify areas that require more investigation.

Methods

PubMed and Scopus were used to perform a literature search. Articles that described 3D-printed patient-specific orthopedic implants or intraoperative guides were reviewed. Relevant articles were compiled and summarized to determine the role of personalized 3D-printed implants in orthopedic surgery.

Results

A total of 58 papers were selected. Overall, 3D-printed implants and surgical guides were shown to be effective in the selected cases. Patients with bone tumors benefitted from custom 3D-printed implants, which allow aggressive resection while preserving the function and mechanical stability of the limb. Eighty-one percent of devices were made using titanium, and 48% of articles reported the use of 3D printing in oncology. Some reported adverse events including wound dehiscence, periprosthetic infection, dislocation, and sequelae of malignancy. Regulations surrounding the use of 3D-printed surgical devices are ambiguous.

Conclusions

Three-dimensional-printed orthopedic implants and guides present an alternative to commercial devices, as they allow for customizability that is useful in cases of anatomic complexity. A variety of materials were surveyed across multiple subspecialties. Large controlled studies are necessary to compare patient-specific implants with the standard of care and evaluate their safety profiles over time.

Application of a posterior anatomical integrated locking compression plate in the treatment of posterior wall acetabular fractures

BACKGROUND

Traditional fixation methods for posterior wall acetabular fractures (PWAFs) typically require the utilization of multiple plates and intraoperative plate contouring, which are technically demanding and carry the risk of intra-articular screw penetration. A novel posterior anatomical integrated locking compression plate (PAILCP) has been designed to optimize these shortcomings. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the PAILCP fixation method for the surgical management of PWAFs.

METHODS

A total of 48 patients with PWAFs who were treated surgically in our department between January 2018 and December 2022 were selected for retrospective analysis. The 48 patients were classified into groups A (PAILCP fixation, n = 25) and B (traditional fixation, n = 23) according to different fixation methods. Fracture reduction quality, number of utilized plates, blood loss, surgical time, instrumentation time, hip function, and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 25 PAILCPs were used in group A, while 34 mini-T plates and 29 reconstruction plates were employed in group B. Compared to the patients in group B, those in group A had significantly shorter instrumentation time (- 16 min) and surgical time (- 23 min) as well as lower blood loss (- 123 ml). However, no significant differences were observed in fracture reduction quality and hip function between the two groups. Additionally, the complication rate was slightly lower in group A (3/25 patients) than in group B (6/23); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Finally, follow-up examination revealed no main plate breakage, miniplate displacement, screw loosening, or intra-articular screw penetration in all patients.

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment of PWAFs using the PAILCP fixation method results in shorter instrumentation and surgical time and lower blood loss than the traditional fixation method. Thus, the PAILCP fixation method is a promising alternative for PWAFs management, offering enhanced surgical ease and safety.

Surgical treatment outcomes of acetabular posterior wall and posterior column fractures using 3D printing technology and individualized custom-made metal plates: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Fractures involving the posterior acetabulum with its rich vascular and neural supply present challenges in trauma orthopedics. This study evaluates the effectiveness of 3D printing technology with the use of custom-made metal plates in the treatment of posterior wall and column acetabular fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis included 31 patients undergoing surgical fixation for posterior wall and column fractures of the acetabulum (16 in the 3D printing group, utilizing 3D printing for a 1:1 pelvic model and custom-made plates based on preoperative simulation; 15 in the traditional group, using conventional methods). Surgical and instrument operation times, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative blood loss, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, preoperative and 12-month postoperative pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS), hip joint function at 6 and 12 months (Harris scores), and complications were compared.

RESULTS

The surgical and instrument operation times were significantly shorter in the 3D printing group (p < 0.001). The 3D printing group exhibited significantly lower intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency and blood loss (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, preoperative pain scores (NRS scores), and 6-month hip joint function (Harris scores) (p > 0.05). However, at 12 months, hip joint function and pain scores were significantly better in the 3D printing group (p < 0.05). Although the incidence of complications was lower in the 3D printing group (18.8% vs. 33.3%), the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.433).

CONCLUSION

Combining 3D printing with individualized custom-made metal plates for acetabular posterior wall and column fractures reduces surgery and instrument time, minimizes intraoperative procedures and blood loss, enhancing long-term hip joint function recovery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

12/04/2023;Trial Registration No. ChiCTR2300070438; http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Three-Dimensional Printed Plate Template Versus Hemipelvis Model in Patient-Specific Plate Preparation for Posterior Wall Acetabular Fractures

OBJECTIVE

The application of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in the management of posterior wall acetabular fractures can greatly reduce surgical invasiveness and operative time and simplify the procedure of reconstruction plate contouring, but the cost and time of patient-specific plate preparation on the basis of traditional 3D-printed pelvis model should not be neglected. We described a new method for patient-specific plate preparation by using 3D-printed plate template. The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of the 3D-printed plate template in patient-specific plate preparation for posterior wall acetabular fractures.

METHODS

A total of 65 cases of posterior wall acetabular fractures with surgical treatment from December 2012 to December 2020 were chosen. According to the different plate contouring methods, the 65 cases were divided into three groups, which were group A (21 cases), group B (20 cases), and group C (24 cases). In group A, the 3D-printed plate template was used to contour the patient-specific reconstruction plate before surgery, whereas the 3D-printed hemipelvis model was adopted for group B. In group C, the reconstruction plate was contoured intraoperatively. Among the three groups, the instrumentation time, surgical time, blood loss, patient-specific plate preparation time, complications, reduction quality, and hip function were compared. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the reduction quality and hip function among three groups.

RESULTS

In comparison with group C, patients in groups A and B were featured by obviously shorter instrumentation time (-22, -23 min), shorter surgical time (-46, -44 min), and less intraoperative blood loss (-110, -122 mL). Compared to the hemipelvis model in group B (2.29 ± 0.56 vs. 12.70 ± 3.79 days), the 3D printing time for plate templates in group A was significantly shorter. The reduction quality and hip function had no obvious statistical difference among the three groups. The complication rate within group A (3/21) and group B (3/20) were both slightly lower than group C (5/24), with no obvious difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the patient-specific pre-contoured plate fixation methods based on the 3D-printed hemipelvis model and plate template can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy, with the advantage of shorter instrumentation and surgical time, and less intraoperative blood loss. However, 3D printing of plate template is easier and less time-consuming, considering the shorter time and less cost for 3D printing of physical model.

One-stop computerized virtual planning system for the surgical management of posterior wall acetabular fractures

Background

Posterior wall acetabular fractures remain one of the most difficult fracture injuries to treat. Accurate assessment of fracture characteristics and appropriate preoperative surgical strategies are essential for excellent reduction. This paper evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of a one-stop computerized virtual planning system for the surgical management of posterior wall acetabular fractures.

Methods

52 cases of posterior wall acetabular fractures treated surgically were selected in our department between January 2015 and December 2020 for retrospective analysis. 52 cases were classified into group A (25 patients) and group B (27 patients) according to whether computerized virtual planning procedures were performed preoperatively. In group A, virtual surgical simulation was conducted using a one-stop computerized planning system preoperatively. In group B, traditional surgery was employed. Reduction quality, surgical time, blood loss, hip function, complications, and instrumentation time were compared between the two groups.

Results

The actual surgery for all patients in group A was essentially the same as the virtual surgery before the operation. Compared to group B, patients in group A had markedly shorter surgical time (−43 min), shorter instrumentation time (−20 min), and less intraoperative blood loss (−130 ml). However, no significant statistical difference was observed in reduction quality and hip function. The complication rate was slightly lower in group A (4/25) than in group B (7/27), without a significant difference.

Conclusion

The one-stop computerized virtual planning system is a highly effective, user-friendly and educational tool for allowing the cost-efficient surgical simulation of posterior wall acetabular fractures and providing a more individualized therapeutic schedule. The one-stop computerized planning system is feasible to treat posterior wall acetabular fractures, which is an effective method than the conventional treatment of posterior wall acetabular fractures.

Trial registration: retrospective registration.

Advantages of three-dimensional printing in the management of acetabular fracture fixed by the Kocher-Langenbeck approach: randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of the Kocher-Langenbeck reduction and fixation of the posterior structures of the acetabulum between 3D printing technique and conventional technique.

METHODS

Forty-three patients who sustained fractures of the posterior part of the acetabulum were randomly assigned to two groups: 3D printing (G1; n = 20) and conventional technique (G2; n = 23). The surgical time, intra-operative blood loss, differences between pre-and post-operative haemoglobin, universal functional and radiographic scores, and complications were compared between the groups. The minimum follow-up was 18 months.

RESULTS

The average operating time (120.75 min) and intra-operative blood loss (244 ml) were lower in G1 than in G2 (125.87 min and 268.7 ml, respectively; p = 0.42, p = 0.1, respectively). The difference between the pre- and post-operative haemoglobin was 1.71 g/dl in G1 and 1.93 g/dl in G2 (p = 0.113). Post-operative complications occurred more frequently in patients in G2 (34.7%) than in patients in G1 (15%), though these differences were also not significant (p = 0.6). The radiographic result was satisfactory in 16 patients (80%) in G1 and 18 patients (78.26%) in G2 (p = 0.5). The clinical result was satisfactory in 15 patients (75%) in G1 and in 17 patients (73.9%) in G2 (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found in terms of surgical time, overall complications, and radiographic or functional outcomes between 3D printing and the conventional technique.

Application of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures in comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures surgery

Background

The treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures remains challenging due to the difficulty in understanding of fracture patterns and lack of appropriate preoperative planning process. Virtual preoperative planning procedures are now being commonly used in orthopedic surgery to aid in management of such complex problems. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of a new method by applying computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures in the treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures.

Methods

A total of 45 patients with comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures from June 2014 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the usage of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures, they were assigned to group A and group B. In group A (24 patients), the new method was applied before surgery. In group B (21 patients), the conventional surgery was performed without assistance of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures. The two groups were assessed in terms of blood loss, surgical time, reduction quality, fracture healing time, postoperative complications, and hip function.

Results

There were no significant differences in demographic data between the two groups. Patients in group A had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (429.58 vs 570.24 ml, P < 0.001) and shorter operation time (154.79 vs 181.90 min, P < 0.01) compared to group B. Using the Matta scoring system, the reduction was graded as anatomic in 20 cases, imperfect in three cases and poor in one case in group A, versus 16 cases was graded as anatomic, three as imperfect and two as poor for group B. According to the modified Merle d’Aubigné score, hip function was graded as excellent in 15 cases, good in seven cases, fair in one and poor in one for group A in comparison to 11 cases, seven cases, two cases, and one case for group B, respectively. The reduction quality and hip function did not differ within the two groups (P > 0.05). The general postoperative complication rate in group A and group B was 12.5% and 28.6%, respectively, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

The application of computerized virtual preoperative planning procedures is feasible in comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures. It helps orthopedic surgeons better understand the fracture characteristics, enables simulation of the reduction process and preoperative planning of internal fixation methods. This new preoperative planning method using a 3D virtual model is a more effective method than conventional method in surgical treatment of comminuted posterior wall acetabular fractures.

Trial registration retrospectively registered.

Does 3D-Assisted Acetabular Fracture Surgery Improve Surgical Outcome and Physical Functioning?-A Systematic Review

Three-dimensional technology is increasingly being used in acetabular fracture treatment. No systematic reviews are available about the added clinical value of 3D-assisted acetabular fracture surgery compared to conventional surgery. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether 3D-assisted acetabular fracture surgery compared to conventional surgery improves surgical outcomes in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy usage, complications, and postoperative fracture reduction, and whether it improves physical functioning. Pubmed and Embase databases were searched for articles on 3D technologies in acetabular fracture surgery, published between 2010 and February 2021. The McMaster critical review form was used to assess the methodological quality. Differences between 3D-assisted and conventional surgery were evaluated using the weighted mean and odds ratios. Nineteen studies were included. Three-dimensional-assisted surgery resulted in significantly shorter operation times (162.5 ± 79.0 versus 296.4 ± 56.0 min), less blood loss (697.9 ± 235.7 mL versus 1097.2 ± 415.5 mL), and less fluoroscopy usage (9.3 ± 5.9 versus 22.5 ± 20.4 times). The odds ratios of complications and fracture reduction were 0.5 and 0.4 for functional outcome in favour of 3D-assisted surgery, respectively. Three-dimensional-assisted surgery reduces operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy usage, and complications. Evidence for the improvement of fracture reduction and functional outcomes is limited.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3D Printing Technology for the Treatment of Acetabular Fractures

Purpose

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has been widely used in orthopedics surgery. However, its efficacy in acetabular fractures remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effect of using 3D printing technology in the surgery for acetabular fractures.

Methods

The systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Four major electronic databases were searched (inception to February 2021). Studies were screened using a priori criteria. Data from each study were extracted by two independent reviewers and organized using a standardized table. Data were pooled and presented in forest plots.

Results

Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis. Four were prospective randomized trials, and nine used a retrospective comparative design. The patients aged between 32.1 (SD 14.6) years and 51.9 (SD 18.9) years. Based on the pooled analyses, overall, 3D printing-assisted surgery decreased operation time by 38.8 minutes (95% CI: -54.9, -22.8), intraoperative blood loss by 259.7 ml (95% CI: -394.6, -124.9), instrumentation time by 34.1 minutes (95% CI: -49.0, -19.1). Traditional surgery was less likely to achieve good/excellent function of hip (RR, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.82) and more likely to have complications than 3D printing-assisted surgery (RR, 1.19; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.33).

Conclusions

3D printing technology demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of acetabular fractures. It may improve surgery-related and clinical outcomes. More prospective studies using a rigorous design (e.g., randomized trial with blinding) are warranted to confirm the long-term effects of 3D printing technology in orthopedics surgeries.

[Research progress of different surgical approaches in treatment of acetabular both-column fractures]

Objective

To review the research progress of different surgical approaches in the treatment of acetabular both-column fractures.

Methods

The domestic and foreign related research literature on surgical approaches for acetabular both-column fractures was extensively consulted. The anatomical characteristics, exposure ranges, advantages, disadvantages, and indications of various common surgical approaches for both-column fractures were mainly summarized.

Results

The ilioinguinal approach is more suitable for both-column fractures if the anterior column fracture is complicated or combined with the anterior wall fracture while the posterior column fracture is simple and stable. The modified Stoppa approach or the lateral (para) rectus abdominal approach is the preferred choice when both-column fractures are combined with a quadrilateral fracture or femoral head dislocation. What's more, the Kocher-Langenbeck approach is required when the posterior column fractures are complicated or combined with posterior wall fractures. In addition, the simultaneous ilioinguinal and Kocher-Langenbeck approaches are the first choices when the both-column fractures possessing extremely severe and obvious displacement.

Conclusion

The reasonable choice of surgical approach is extremely important for acetabular both-column fractures. Each surgical approach has its advantages and limitations. It is necessary to take the precise reposition of the acetabular joint surface as the principle, and comprehensively judge the fracture types and severity of anterior column, posterior column, and square area, and then select the optimal surgical approach for surgical treatment.

Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is a well-accepted treatment for established hip arthritis following acetabular fractures. If a conservatively managed or operated case progresses to non-union/mal-union failing to restore the joint integrity, it may eventually develop secondary arthritis warranting a total hip arthroplasty. Also, in recent years, acute total hip arthroplasty is gaining importance in conditions where the fracture presents with pre-existing hip arthritis, is not amenable to salvage by open reduction and internal fixation, or, a poor prognosis is anticipated following fixation. There are several surgical challenges in performing total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures whether acute or delayed. As a separate entity elderly patients pose a distinct challenge due to osteoporosis and need stable fixation for early weight bearing alleviating the risk of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary complications and decubitus ulcer. The aim of surgery is to restore the columns for acetabular component implantation rather than anatomic fixation. Meticulous preoperative planning with radiographs and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, adequate exposure to delineate the fracture pattern, and, availability of an array of all instruments and possible implants as backup are the key points for success. Previous implants if any should be removed only if they are in the way of cup implantation or infected. Press fit uncemented modern porous metal acetabular component with multiple screw options is the preferred implant for majority of cases. However, complex fractures may require major reconstruction with revision THA implants especially when a pelvic discontinuity is present.