Low-profile double plating versus dorsal LCP in stabilization of the olecranon fractures

The effect of Ding's screws and tension band wiring for treatment of olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study

Although tension band wiring (TBW) is popular and recommended by the AO group, the high rate of complications such as skin irritation and migration of the K-wires cannot be ignored. Ding's screw tension band wiring (DSTBW) is a new TBW technique that has shown positive results in the treatment of other fracture types. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of DSTBW in the treatment of olecranon fractures by biomechanical testing. We conducted a Synbone biomechanical model by using three fixation methods: DSTBW, intramedullary screw and tension band wiring (IM-TBW), and K-wire TBW, were simulated to fix the olecranon fractures. We compared the mechanical stability of DSTBW, IM-TBW, and TBW in the Mayo Type IIA olecranon fracture Synbone model using a single cycle loading to failure protocol or pullout force. During biomechanical testing, the average fracture gap measurements were recorded at varying flexion angles in three different groups: TBW, IM-TBW, and DSTBW. The TBW group exhibited measurements of 0.982 mm, 0.380 mm, 0.613 mm, and 1.285 mm at flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° respectively. The IM-TBW group displayed average fracture gap measurements of 0.953 mm, 0.366 mm, 0.588 mm, and 1.240 mm at each of the corresponding flexion angles. The DSTBW group showed average fracture gap measurements of 0.933 mm, 0.358 mm, 0.543 mm, and 1.106 mm at the same flexion angles. No specimen failed in each group during the cyclic loading phase. Compared with the IM-TBW and TBW groups, the DSTBW group showed significant differences in 60° and 90° flexion angles. The mean maximum failure load was 1229.1 ± 110.0 N in the DSTBW group, 990.3 ± 40.7 N in the IM-TBW group, and 833.1 ± 68.7 N in the TBW group. There was significant difference between each groups (p < 0.001).The average maximum pullout strength for TBW was measured at 57.6 ± 5.1 N, 480.3 ± 39.5 N for IM-TBW, and 1324.0 ± 43.8 N for DSTBW. The difference between maximum pullout strength of both methods was significant to p < 0.0001. DSTBW fixation provides more stability than IM-TBW and TBW fixation models for olecranon fractures.

Omega Plate Fixation of Comminuted Olecranon Fractures: Technique and Case Series

Fixation of olecranon fractures, especially those with minimal proximal bone and those that present with significant comminution, can be technically challenging. Current open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) methods, such as tension band wire (TBW) constructs, plate fixation (PF), and intramedullary screws (IMSF), have demonstrated high rates of reoperation and symptomatic implants. We present the omega plate technique, which utilizes a mini-fragment plate passed under the triceps tendon insertion, allowing maximal implant surface area contact with small, proximal olecranon fracture fragments. The mini-fragment plate is not placed on the dorsal subcutaneous border of the ulna, which allows it to capture medial and lateral fragments of cortical comminution and may contribute to less soft tissue irritation.

"Mother and baby plate": a strategy to improve stability in proximal fractures of the ulna

INTRODUCTION

Proximal ulna fractures with a large zone of comminution, such as in the context of Monteggia injuries, require mechanically strong osteosyntheses as they occur in regions with high physiological joint load. Consequently, implant failure and pseudarthrosis are critical and devastating complications, especially with the background of mainly young patients being affected. An effective solution could be provided by adding a small second plate 90° angulated to the standard dorsal plate in the area of non-union. Thus, this study investigates whether, from a biomechanical point of view, the use of such a mini or baby plate is worthwhile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Comminuted fractures distal to the coronoid process, equivalent to Jupiter type IIb fractures, are generated on artificial Sawbones® of the ulna and stabilized using two different plate osteosyntheses: in the first group, a dorsal locking compression olecranon plate is used (LCP group). In the second group, a small, ulnar 5-hole olecranon plate is added as a baby plate in addition to the mother plate at the level of the fracture zone (MBP group). Dynamic biomechanical loading in degrees of flexion from 0° to 90° is carried out to determine yield load, stiffness, displacement, and changes in fracture gap width as well as bending of the dorsal plate.

RESULTS

The "mother-baby-plate" osteosynthesis had a significantly higher yield load (p < 0.01) and stiffness (p = 0.01) than the LCP group. This correlates with the increased movement of the proximal fracture element during cyclic testing for the LCP group compared to the MBP group as measured by an optical metrology system.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we show evidence that the addition of a small plate to the standard plate is highly effective in increasing the biomechanical stability in severe fractures equivalent to Jupiter type IIb. As it hopefully minimizes complications like pseudarthrosis and implant failure and as the additional preparatory effort leading to compromised blood supply is regarded to be negligible, this justifies and highly advises the use of a mother-baby-plate system.

Olecranon Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Olecranon fractures account for 10% of all elbow fractures and are more likely to result from a low-energy injury. A displaced fracture with a stable ulnohumeral joint (Mayo type 2) is the most common type of injury.

»

The management of an isolated olecranon fracture is based on patient factors (age, functional demand, and if medically fit to undergo surgery) and fracture characteristics including displacement, fragmentation, and elbow stability.

»

Nonoperative management can be successfully used in undisplaced fractures (Mayo type 1) and in displaced fractures (Mayo type 2) in frail patients with lower functional demands.

»

Patients with displaced olecranon fractures with a stable ulnohumeral joint without significant articular surface fragmentation (Mayo type 2A) can be managed with tension band wiring, plate osteosynthesis (PO), intramedullary fixation, or suture repair.

»

PO is advocated for multifragmentary fractures and fractures that are associated with ulnohumeral instability. It is essential to consider the variable anatomy of the proximal ulna during surgery.

There is no difference in the complication or re-operation rates between tension band wiring and locking plate fixation for olecranon fractures. The findings of a multicentre study

INTRODUCTION

Tension band wire (TBW) and locking plate fixation (LPF) are widely used fixation methods for displaced fractures of the olecranon. The aim of our study was to review the current operative management of olecranon fractures and compare the complication and re-operation rates for patients undergoing TBW and LPF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data were collected for all patients who underwent acute fixation of olecranon fractures in 2016 across nine hospitals in the United Kingdom. We reviewed these cases to determine the incidence of complications and re-operations.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty patients were included in the study. Seventy-three (52%) had TBW, 67 (48%) had LPF. Males were more likely to have LPF (p = 0.01) as were patients with comminuted fractures (p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 25%, including an infection rate of 3%, a prominent metalwork irritation rate of 12% and the overall re-operation rate was 17%. There was no significant difference in the complication rate (p = 0.38), infection rate (p = 0.92) or rate of prominent metalwork irritation (p = 0.10) between patients undergoing TBW and LPF. Sub group analysis of patients with comminuted fractures also demonstrated no significant difference in complication rates (p = 0.75) or re-operation rates (p = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

LPF has previously been advocated to be advantageous to TBW due to lower reported complication and re-operation rates despite there being no significant difference in functional outcomes. In this multicentre case series, which is the largest in the literature to date, we did not observe any significant differences in complication rates or re-operation rates between the two, even amongst comminuted fractures (which are traditionally treated with LPF), when decision making was left to surgeon preference. We, therefore, recommend that choice of fixation method should be left to individual surgeon's preference.

Outcomes of embedded rafting k-wire technique for intermediate articular fragment fixation in comminuted olecranon fractures

BACKGROUND

Severely comminuted olecranon fractures are challenging injuries. Commonly used tension band wiring exerts excessive compressive forces causing olecranon shortening and joint incongruity. This study aimed to introduce the embedded rafting k-wire technique with the bridging technique for intermediate articular fragment fixation in comminuted olecranon fractures and evaluate its clinical and radiological outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 34 patients with comminuted olecranon fractures were treated with rafting k-wire fixation combined with a locking plate. Time to union, the number of rafting k-wires in the intermediate articular fragment, quality of joint reduction, and secondary reduction loss were analyzed. Elbow range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and complications were evaluated at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Fracture union was obtained in all patients. The mean number of intermediate articular fragments was 2.4 ± 0.7, and the average number of rafting k-wires was 3.0 ± 1.2. There were mild and moderate degree early posttraumatic osteoarthritis in 6 cases (17.6%) at the mean 20.8 months of follow-up. At the final follow-up, the mean range of elbow motion was 4.6° of flexion contracture and 133.5° of further flexion. The average MEPS was 97.1 (range, 75-100). Two patients had heterotrophic ossification without functional impairment.

CONCLUSION

The embedded rafting k-wire technique with bridging plates in comminuted olecranon fractures exhibited satisfactory outcomes. This method might serve as an alternative when considering the ability to restore articular congruency and stability in severely comminuted olecranon fragments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic.

Biomechanical comparison of the new cross-locking intramedullary nail with tension band wiring for transverse olecranon fractures

BACKGROUND

In the treatment of transverse olecranon fractures, complicated tension band wiring (TBW) has high rates of re-operations. Besides, plate fixation (PF) and TBW both have large surgical incisions and soft-tissue irritation. Therefore, the new cross-locking intramedullary nail (CIN) with easy handling and minimally invasive features is significantly advantageous. The goal of this study was to biomechanically compare CIN with TBW for fixing transverse olecranon fracture.

METHODS

The transverse olecranon fracture models were created with 15 fresh-frozen cadaveric ulnae which were randomly divided into 3 groups: one group for TBW fixation, another for CIN fixation with 1 conical locking screw (CIN-1), and the last for CIN fixation with 3 conical locking screws (CIN-3). The stiffness, cyclic stability, and failure strength of the fixed fracture models were compared after the corresponding experimental tests.

RESULTS

The failure strength of TBW, CIN-1 and CIN-3 were (313.38±27.68) N, (528.56±53.58) N and (871.04±94.95) N. There was a significant difference between them. However, as for dynamic stability and stiffness, CIN-3 was higher and TBW was lower, with no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical properties of CIN were superior to those of TBW, and CIN was more stable and solid for fixing transverse olecranon fracture, of which CIN-3 was the strongest.

Lag screw osteosynthesis of simple olecranon fractures: A biomechanical comparative study

Olecranon fractures are most frequently stabilized by tension band wiring (TBW), which unfortunately leads to relevant implant removal rates due to K-wire migration and soft tissue irritation. As lag screw osteosynthesis (LSO) might be a gentle and effective alternative in simple fracture patterns, the goal of the present study was to biomechanically compare LSO with TBW in simple olecranon fractures at a cadaver model. A simple olecranon fracture (Mayo type IIA) was created in eight pairs of human cadaver elbows, which were pairwise fixed by either TBW or two transcortical 4.0 mm lag screws. Biomechanical testing was conducted as a pulling force, applied to the triceps tendon in a 90° position. First, cyclic loading between 10 and 300 N was performed for 50,000 cycles. Afterward, maximum load was raised by 0.02 N/cycle until construct failure, what was defined as displacement >2 mm. Besides fracture displacement, failure cycle and failure load, the modes of failure were analyzed. Within the first five cycles, there was no significant difference in displacement (median TBW: 0.2 mm; LSO: 0.5 mm; p = 0.091). Both after 2000 (median TBW: 0.2 mm; LSO: 0.6 mm; p = 0.042) and after 20,000 cycles (median TBW: 0.4 mm; LSO: 0.9 mm; p = 0.027), the difference was significant. Failure cycle (median TBW: 72,639 cycles; LSO: 43,429 cycles; p = 0.017) and failure load (median TBW: 702 N; LSO: 303 N; p = 0.025) differed significantly as well. TBW mostly (6/8) failed at the lock of the cerclage wire, whereas most LSO constructs (5/8) failed as a pullout of the proximal fragment. In conclusion, to our biomechanical findings at human cadaver specimens, simple olecranon fractures treated by LSO show higher dislocation rates and lower failure loads compared to conventional TBW and mostly fail by pullout of the proximal fragment.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of three internal fixation techniques in the treatment of olecranon fracture: a retrospective clinical study

OBJECTIVE

The application of double plating in olecranon fractures is becoming increasingly widespread. There is no research comparing this technique with traditional tension band wiring (TBW) and the single plate technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of three fixation techniques in olecranon fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2016 to May 2020, we collected the clinical data of 95 patients with olecranon fractures who underwent surgical treatment. Thirty-five patients received TBW surgery (TBW Group), 32 patients received a 3.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP, 3.5 mm LCP Group), and 28 patients received double mini-locking plate treatment (DP Group). The operation time, fracture union time, time of return to work, range of motion (ROM), soft tissue stimulation to remove internal fixation, and patient-related functional results (the Weseley score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score [MEPS], and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score [DASH]) were recorded. The clinical results and complications of the three internal fixation techniques were compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was 15.011.82 months (12-18 months). All patients' fractures healed by first intention. There were no statistically significant differences in the operation time, fracture union time, ROM, Weseley score, MEPS or DASH scores of the three groups of patients. The postoperative return time for patients in the TBW group was 10.002.15 weeks, the 3.5 mm LCP group was 9.561.93 weeks, and the DP group was 8.432.38 weeks (P = 0.014); 12 patients in the TBW group required removal of plant due to soft tissue stimulation, the 3.5 mm LCP group had 8 cases, and the DP group had 2 cases (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative clinical results and elbow joint function of patients with olecranon fractures fixed by tension band wiring, 3.5 mm LCP and double mini-locking plate are similar, which indicates that double-plate technology can be used as an alternative to the two groups of traditional techniques. In addition, double-plate technology also helps patients return to work earlier and has a lower incidence of soft tissue stimulation.

Olecranon fractures: applied anatomy, clinical assessment and evidence-based management

Olecranon fractures are common injuries, making up 10% of all fractures of the upper limb. They usually result from a fall from standing height in older people, or from a direct blow in young people. The olecranon's superficial location, with poor soft tissue and muscle protection, make it liable to fracture following direct impact.

Factors such as the degree of initial force and the quality of the patient's bone result in a range of injury patterns, from simple undisplaced fractures to complex open fracture dislocations. In the context of high energy trauma, the patient should first be assessed for life-threatening injuries. A thorough history and clinical examination including neurovascular assessment should then be completed. Antero-posterior and lateral X-rays are sufficient to confirm the diagnosis. Initial management includes immobilisation in an above elbow backslab, a sling and analgesia.

Owing to the pull of the triceps muscle which attaches to the tip of the olecranon, fracture displacement is common and surgical intervention is often required, usually with good outcomes. Surgical techniques include tension band wiring, open reduction internal fixation with a pre-contoured locking plate and tension band suture fixation. Undisplaced fractures or displaced fractures in older patients can be managed conservatively with an above elbow cast for 4 weeks. This article covers applied anatomy, initial presentation, clinical assessment and evidence-based management.

Biomechanical comparison between double-plate fixation and posterior plate fixation for comminuted olecranon fracture using two triceps screws in synthetic bone model

BACKGROUND

Although preventing triceps fragment displacement is essential for treating an olecranon fracture, we frequently encounter situations in which only a few screws can be fixed to the triceps fragment. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of double-plate fixation and posterior plate fixation for olecranon fractures when the triceps fragment was small and only 2 screws could be inserted.

METHODS

A composite ulna model was used to simulate olecranon fracture. Four groups were formed consisting of double-plate and posterior plates with cortical and locking screws. The cyclic loading test was conducted for 500 cyclic loads of 5 to 50 N on a specimen to measure micromotion and displacement of the gap caused by light exercise. The load-to-failure test was performed by applying a load until fixation loss, defined as when the fracture gap increased by 2 mm or more or catastrophic failure occurred, to measure the maximum load.

RESULTS

Eight samples per group were tested through the pilot study. All groups were stable with a micromotion of <0.5 mm. However, the mean micromotion showed significant differences between the 4 groups (P < .001, Table 1). In the mean micromotion during exercise, posterior plating with cortical screws was the most stable (0.09 ± 0.02 mm) while double-plating with cortical screws was the most unstable (0.42 ± 0.11 mm). At the maximum load, posterior plating with locking screws was the strongest (205.3 ± 2.8 N) while double-plating with cortical screws was the weakest (143.3 ± 27.1 N). There was no significant difference in displacement after light exercise between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that when 2 triceps screws were used, both groups were stable during light exercise, but posterior-plating was stronger than double-plating.

Double plating is associated with higher fixation strength than single plating in osteoporotic fractures of the scapular spine: a biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION

The number of atraumatic stress fractures of the scapular spine associated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing. At present, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Due to the already weakened bone, fractures of the scapular spine require a high fixation stability. Higher fixation strength may be achieved by double plating. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical principles of double plating in comparison to single plating for scapular spine fractures.

METHODS

In this study, eight pairs (n = 16) of human shoulders were randomised pairwise into two groups. After an osteotomy at the level of the spinoglenoid notch, one side of each pair received fracture fixation with a single 3.5 LCP (Locking Compression Plate) plate. The contralateral scapular spine was fixed with a 3.5 LCP and an additional 2.7 LCP plate in 90-90 configuration. The biomechanical test protocol consisted of 700 cycles of dynamic loading and a load-to-failure test with a servohydraulic testing machine. Failure was defined as macroscopic catastrophic failure (screw cut-out, plate breakage). The focus was set on the results of specimens with osteoporotic bone quality.

RESULTS

In specimens with an osteoporotic bone mineral density (BMD; n = 12), the mean failure load was significantly higher for the double plate group compared to single plating (471 N vs. 328 N; p = 0.029). Analysis of all specimens (n = 16) including four specimens without osteoporotic BMD revealed no significant differences regarding stiffness and failure load (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Double plating may provide higher fixation strength in osteoporotic bone in comparison to a single plate alone. This finding is of particular relevance for fixation of scapular spine fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Controlled laboratory study.

Proximal ulna fractures in adults: A review of diagnosis and management

Proximal ulna fractures are relatively common upper limb injuries, which may represent fragility fractures or result from high-energy trauma. These include fractures of the olecranon, coronoid and associated radial head dislocations. A wide variety of treatment options are available for the management of these injuries that makes the selection of most appropriate treatment difficult. We aim to provide a brief overview of the treatment options for such injuries.

Nailing vs. plating in comminuted proximal ulna fractures - a biomechanical analysis

Background

Comminuted proximal ulna fractures are severe injuries with a high degree of instability. These injuries require surgical treatment, usually angular stable plating or double plating is performed. Nailing of proximal ulna fracture is described but not performed regularly. The aim of this study was to compare a newly developed, locked proximal ulna nail with an angular stable plate in an unstable fracture of the proximal ulna. We hypothesize, that locked nailing of the proximal ulna will provide non-inferior stability compared to locked plating.

Methods

A defect fracture distal to the coronoid was simulated in 20 sawbones. After nailing or plate osteosynthesis the constructs were tested in a servo-pneumatic testing machine under physiological joint motion (0°-90°) and cyclic loading (30 N – 300 N). Intercyclic osteotomy gap motion and plastic deformation of the constructs were analyzed using micromotion video-analysis.

Results

The locked nail showed lower osteotomy gap motion (0.50 ± 0.15 mm) compared to the angular stable plate (1.57 ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.001). At the anterior cortex the plastic deformation of the constructs was significantly lower for the locked nail (0.09 ± 0.17 mm vs. 0.39 ± 0.27 mm, p = 0.003). No statistically significant differences were observed at the posterior cortex for both parameters.

Conclusions

Nail osteosynthesis in comminuted proximal ulna fractures shows lower osteotomy gap motion and lower amount of plastic deformation compared to locking plate osteosynthesis under laboratory conditions.