Overlengthening of the radial column in radial head replacement: a review of the literature and presentation of a classification system

Which radial head fractures are best treated surgically?

Despite the common occurrence of radial head fractures, there is still a lack of consensus on which radial head fractures should be treated surgically. The radial head is an important secondary stabilizer in almost all directions. An insufficient radial head can lead to increased instability in varus-valgus and posterolateral rotatory directions, especially in a ligament-deficient elbow. The decision to perform surgery is often not dictated by the fracture pattern alone but also by the presence of associated injury. Comminution of the radial head and complete loss of cortical contact of at least one fracture fragment are associated with a high occurrence of associated injuries. Nondisplaced and minimally displaced radial head fractures can be treated non-operatively with early mobilization. Displacement (>2 mm) of fragments in radial head fractures without a mechanical block to pronation/supination is not a clear indication for surgery. Mechanical block to pronation/supination and comminution of the fracture are indications for surgery. The following paper reviews the current literature and provides state-of-the-art guidance on which radial head fractures should be treated surgically.

Intraoperative visualization of the posterolateral ulnohumeral joint space is reliable to indicate overlengthening in radial head arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Avoiding overlengthening in radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is essential for the prognosis of the elbow joint. An overlengthening from 2 mm is visible due to widening of the anterolateral ulnohumeral joint space but intraoperatively, this particular joint space is difficult to visualize. The commonly used Kocher approach allows visualization of the posterolateral joint space without additional instruments or further surgical release of the already unstable elbow. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the visualization of the posterolateral joint space is also a reliable method to indicate overlengthening in RHA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RHA was performed in five human cadaveric specimens with the forearm, wrist, and hand intact. The lateral ligament complex was detached and an anatomic transosseous refixation was performed. Six stages of implantation heights were documented: native joint (1), RHA at the anatomic height (2), + 2 mm (3), + 4 mm (4), + 6 mm (5) and - 2 mm (6). Macroscopic measurement and digital image analysis of the posterolateral and anterolateral ulnohumeral joint spaces were performed.

RESULTS

All stages of overlengthening showed a significant increase in posterolateral and anterolateral joint space widening (p < 0.05). The posterior and anterior joint space showed excellent intraclass correlation.

CONCLUSION

Visualization of the posterolateral aspect of the ulnohumeral joint space is a reliable indicator for overlengthening in RHA without further compromising an already unstable elbow. Correlation to the findings of the anterolateral ulnohumeral joint space in different implants leads to the assumption that visualization of either the anterior or posterior ulnohumeral joint space is universally applicable to determine overlengthening in RHA, regardless of the type of the radial head implant.

Radial head replacement with the 3D-printed patient-specific titanium prosthesis: Preliminary results of a multi-centric prospective study

PURPOSE

To report preliminary clinical results and safety of 3D-printed patient-specific titanium radial head (RH) prosthesis in treatment of the irreparable RH fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This multi-centric prospective study included 10 patients (6 men and four women, mean age 41 years (range, 25-64 years)). Three cases were classified as Mason type III and 7 cases as type IV. Patients were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks postoperatively. Range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), radiology imaging, and laboratory blood and urine testing were evaluated.

RESULTS

The prostheses were implanted utilizing cemented stems in 5 patients and cementless stems in 5 patients. Intraoperatively, well congruency of a prosthesis with capitellum and radial notch of ulna was observed in all cases. All patients had improvement of ROM, VAS score, DASH score, and MEPS during the postoperative follow-ups. At the final follow-up, mean elbow extension was 6.5° (range, 0°-30°), flexion 145° (range, 125°-150°), supination 79° (range, 70°-80°), and pronation 73.5° (range, 45°-80°). Mean VAS score was 0.3 (range, 0-3), DASH score was 12.35 (range, 1.7-23.3), and MEPS was 99.5 (range, 95-100). Postoperative radiographs demonstrated heterotopic ossification in 2 cases, periprosthetic radiolucency in 2 cases, and proximal radial neck resorption in 2 cases. No one had the evidence of capitellar erosion, implant failure, malpositioning, overstuffing, or symptomatic stem loosening. There was no significant alteration of laboratory results or adverse events related to the 3D-printed prosthesis implantation.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary results demonstrated that implantation of the 3D-printed patient-specific titanium RH prosthesis is safe and may be a potential treatment option for irreparable RH fracture.

Radial head replacement for acute complex elbow instability: a long-term comparative cohort study of 2 implant designs

BACKGROUND

Radial head fractures not amenable to reconstruction should be treated by radial head replacement (RHR) when there is associated elbow or forearm instability. There are multiple RHR designs with different philosophies, but 2 of the most commonly used implants include the anatomic press-fit radial head system and the loose-fit metallic spacer. There is little information available specifically comparing the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of these 2 systems. The objective of this study was to compare the long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of 2 RHR designs in the context of complex acute elbow instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-five patients with an average age of 54 years (range, 21-87 years) underwent an acute RHR (46 press-fit Acumed anatomic and 49 loose-fit Evolve metallic spacer) and were prospectively followed for an average of 61 months (range, 24-157 months). There were 34 terrible triads; 36 isolated RH fractures with medial, lateral, or longitudinal instability; and 25 RH fractures associated with a proximal ulnar fracture. Clinical outcome and disability were evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Oxford Elbow Score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Pain and satisfaction were assessed using a visual analog scale. Radiographic analysis included presence of loosening, bone loss, and overstuffing related to the RHR.

RESULTS

Eight patients with an anatomic RHR (2 with overstuffing, 3 for stiffness, and 3 with loose implants) and 1 patient with a spacer (with stiffness) required implant removal. There were no significant differences between spacer RHR and anatomic RHR in arc of motion (120° vs. 113°, P = .14), pain relief (1 vs. 1.7, P = .135), MEPS (94 vs. 88; P = .07), Oxford Elbow Score (42.3 vs. 42.2, P = .4), or DASH score (12.2 vs. 14.4, P = .5). However, patients with a spacer RHR were significantly more satisfied (9 vs. 7.7; P = .004) than those with an anatomic implant. Radiographically, 19 anatomic implants had significant proximal bone loss and 10 showed complete lucent lines around the stem. Lucent lines were common around the spacer RHR. These radiographic changes were not always related to worse clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Both the anatomic and spacer RHR designs can provide good clinical long-term outcomes. However, patients with a spacer showed a higher degree of satisfaction and those with an anatomic press-fit RHR had a higher revision rate, with radiographic changes that warrant continued follow-up.

90-day outcomes and factors for complications following radial head arthroplasty for Mason Type III and IV radial head fractures

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate 90-day outcomes and complications following radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for Mason Type III and IV radial head fractures (RHFs) and determine factors predisposing patients to early complications and revision surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing RHA for Mason Type III and IV RHFs were identified retrospectively from an institutional database. Postoperative complications, reoperations, elbow range of motion, radiographs and concomitant injuries on the ipsilateral upper extremity were reviewed. Additionally, injuries were sub-classified as low-energy trauma (LET) or high-energy trauma (HET). Univariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the risk for complications using patient factors not limited to the presence of concomitant ligamentous or bony injuries. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Seventy four patients were included in our study with an average follow-up time of 12.7 months. Complications within 90-days of operation occurred in 8.1% of patients: heterotopic ossification (4.1%), superficial wound dehiscence (2.7%), and posterior interosseous nerve palsy (1.4%). No patients required readmission or revision surgery in the 90-day postoperative period. Univariate regression analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between diabetes, ASA status, HET versus LET, or the presence of concomitant injury. Concomitant injuries were found in 92% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Radial head arthroplasty for RHFs demonstrates a low complication rate in the short-term. Diabetes, ASA class, high versus low energy trauma, and presence of concomitant injury were not found to be associated with higher complication rates in the 90-day postoperative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level of evidence IV, retrospective case series.

Mid-term outcome following radial head arthroplasty in acute trauma: risk factors for poor outcome

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of a single type of radial head implant in a large cohort of patients at mid-term follow-up and to determine the associated risk factors for inferior functional outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective follow-up assessment of 65 patients (33 women and 32 men; mean age, 53.3 years [range, 22-81 years]) who underwent radial head arthroplasty (RHA) for acute trauma between 2012 and 2018, after a minimum follow-up period of 3 years. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Mayo Modified Wrist Score were evaluated, and all available radiographs were analyzed. All complications and revision procedures were assessed. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors for a poor outcome following RHA.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up period of 4.1 years (range, 3-9.4 years), the mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 77.2 (standard deviation [SD], 18.9); mean Oxford Elbow Score, 32.0 (SD, 10.6); mean Mayo Modified Wrist Score, 74.6 (SD, 13.7); and mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 29.0 (SD, 21.2). Average range of motion measured 10° (SD, 15°) in extension, 125° (SD, 14°) in flexion, 81° (SD, 14°) in pronation, and 63° (SD, 24°) in supination. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 38.5% and 30.8%, respectively, with severe elbow stiffness being the most common reason for revision. Patient age >50 years, the use of an external fixator, the presence of accompanying medial collateral ligament injuries, and the development of higher-grade osteoarthritis were associated with a poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory medium-term outcomes can be achieved using a monopolar, long-stemmed RHA in patients with acute trauma. However, complication and revision rates are high, frequently leading to inferior outcome scores. Additionally, a higher patient age, the use of an external fixator, the presence of accompanying medial collateral ligament injuries, and the occurrence of higher-grade osteoarthritis were associated with a poor outcome; these factors should raise awareness by the treating trauma surgeon.

[Clinical results of total elbow arthroplasty after treatment failure for Monteggia-like injuries]

BACKGROUND

Monteggia-like fractures (MLF) are complex injuries with high complication rates and frequently unsatisfying clinical results. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) represents the only option to salvage the functional requirements in some patients with pronounced posttraumatic arthropathy. This case series provides clinical results of TEA following failed treatment of MLF.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TEA from 2017 to 2022 for failed treatment of MLF were retrospectively included in this study. Complications and revisions before and after TEA and functional results, measured by the Broberg/Morrey score, were evaluated.

RESULTS

In this study 9 patients with a mean age of 68 (±7; 54-79) years were included. The mean follow-up was 12 (±9; 2-27) months. The main reasons leading to posttraumatic arthropathy were chronic infections (44.4%), bony instability due to coronoid deficiency (33.3%) or a combined coronoid and radial head deficiency (22.2%) and non-union of the proximal ulna with radial head necrosis (11.1%). The mean number of surgical revisions between primary fixation and TEA was 2.7 (±1.8; 0-6). The revision rate following TEA was 44%. The mean Broberg/Morrey score at the time of the latest follow-up was 83 (±10; 71-97) points.

CONCLUSION

Chronic infection and coronoid deficiency are the main reasons for posttraumatic arthropathy after MLF leading to TEA. While the overall clinical results are satisfying, the indications should be reserved for selected cases due to high revision rates.

Early aseptic loosening of a press-fit radial head prosthesis - A case series of 6 patients

OBJECTIVE

Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is the principal treatment option for comminuted radial head (RH) fractures. Here, we present six cases of failed RHA using a modular monopolar press-fit RHA that was subsequently withdrawn from the market because it was associated with a high incidence of loosening.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from six patients who had received Radial Head Prothesis System^TM at our centre between July 2015 and June 2016. The average follow-up was 40 months.

RESULTS

Aseptic loosening of the stem affected five (83%) of the six RHA. Four of these were symptomatic and RHA removal was performed. For these patients, the pain subsided and their elbow range of motion (ROM) improved.

CONCLUSION

While the ideal design for an RHA is still debatable, RHA is an efficient treatment option that restores elbow stability and function after a comminuted RH fracture. Importantly, removal of the prosthesis is an effective remedy following RHA associated elbow pain and decreased ROM.

Posttreatment Changes of the Elbow

Radiologists should be familiar with the typical surgical procedures applied at the elbow and aware of the spectrum of normal and pathologic appearances of posttreatment situations throughout all radiologic modalities. Most important in the case of posttraumatic surgical elbow procedures is correct postoperative elbow joint alignment, appropriate fixation of joint-forming fragments, and proper insertion of screws, plates, and anchor devices that do not conflict with intra-articular or bony structures. To report soft tissue repair procedures correctly, radiologists need to know the broad spectrum of different techniques applied and their appearance on magnetic resonance imaging.