1
|
Lee KW, Yap SF, Murdan S, Zainudin Z, Abdul Hamid H, Emamjomeh M, Mohd Desa MN, Sither Joseph NM, Azmai Amal MN, Amin-Nordin S. Maternal and neonatal group B streptococcus colonisation: A systematic review and the meta-analysis of matched-pair studies. Acta Paediatr 2024; 113:892-911. [PMID: 38351491 DOI: 10.1111/apa.17152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
AIM To determine the prevalence of group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage among parturient women and neonates, and the relative risk of vertical transmission, the relative risk of early and late-onset GBS and the pooled incidence of early-late-onset GBS infection. METHODS A systematic search of relevant cohort studies from three electronic databases to identify all relevant studies published up to 7 November 2022. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS A total of 54 articles with 355 787 matched pairs of parturient women and neonates from 30 countries were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of GBS colonisation was 17.1% among the pregnant women and 1.0% among neonates. The pooled prevalence of vertical transmission of GBS was 4.5% and the pooled relative risk of GBS colonisation of neonates born to mothers with GBS was 9.9. CONCLUSION We support the implementation of targeted intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for all women who are positive for GBS as well as women with risks factors for early onset GBS in their infants regardless of their GBS colonisation status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Wei Lee
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Sook Fan Yap
- Department of Pre-Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
- Centre for Research on Communicable Diseases, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang, Malaysia
| | - Sudaxshina Murdan
- Department of Pharmaceutics, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Zurina Zainudin
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Habibah Abdul Hamid
- Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mohsen Emamjomeh
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Nasir Mohd Desa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Narcisse Mary Sither Joseph
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mohammad Noor Azmai Amal
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Syafinaz Amin-Nordin
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
- Hospital Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
- Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berardi A, Spada C, Vaccina E, Boncompagni A, Bedetti L, Lucaccioni L. Intrapartum beta-lactam antibiotics for preventing group B streptococcal early-onset disease: can we abandon the concept of 'inadequate' intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2020; 18:37-46. [PMID: 31762370 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1697233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal sepsis remains a serious and potentially fatal illness. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) prevents group B streptococcal (GBS) early-onset sepsis. The optimal duration of IAP (adequate IAP) to reduce vertical transmission of GBS has been debated. Understanding the mechanism of action of IAP may help in minimizing neonatal evaluation and unnecessary antibiotic use.Areas covered: In recent years, several studies on pharmacokinetics and clinical use of IAP have been published. Although penicillin and ampicillin are the most preferred antibiotics, the clinical efficacy of non-beta-lactam antibiotics, including clindamycin and vancomycin, used in cases of penicillin anaphylaxis-associated allergy, remains debatable. This is a narrative review of the literature regarding the impact of 'inadequate' IAP on the clinical management of women and newborns.Expert opinion: Recent evidence suggests that 'inadequate' IAP with beta-lactams is more effective in preventing vertical transmission of GBS than previously thought. Newborns exposed to intrapartum beta-lactams and who are asymptomatic at birth are likely uninfected, irrespective of IAP duration before delivery. Hence, we may abandon the concept of 'inadequate' IAP with beta-lactams in early-onset GBS sepsis, relying primarily on clinical signs observed at birth for managing IAP-exposed neonates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Berardi
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, Azienda Ospedaliera, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Caterina Spada
- Pediatric Post-graduate School, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Eleonora Vaccina
- Pediatric Post-graduate School, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Luca Bedetti
- PhD Program in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Lucaccioni
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Women's and Children's Health Department, Azienda Ospedaliera, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Russell NJ, Seale AC, O'Sullivan C, Le Doare K, Heath PT, Lawn JE, Bartlett L, Cutland C, Gravett M, Ip M, Madhi SA, Rubens CE, Saha SK, Schrag S, Sobanjo-Ter Meulen A, Vekemans J, Baker CJ. Risk of Early-Onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease With Maternal Colonization Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 65:S152-S159. [PMID: 29117325 PMCID: PMC5850448 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early-onset group B streptococcal disease (EOGBS) occurs in neonates (days 0-6) born to pregnant women who are rectovaginally colonized with group B Streptococcus (GBS), but the risk of EOGBS from vertical transmission has not been systematically reviewed. This article, the seventh in a series on the burden of GBS disease, aims to estimate this risk and how it varies with coverage of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), used to reduce the incidence of EOGBS. Methods We conducted systematic reviews (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), World Health Organization Library Information System [WHOLIS], and Scopus) and sought unpublished data from investigator groups on maternal GBS colonization and neonatal outcomes. We included articles with ≥200 GBS colonized pregnant women that reported IAP coverage. We did meta-analyses to determine pooled estimates of risk of EOGBS, and examined the association in risk of EOGBS with IAP coverage. Results We identified 30 articles including 20328 GBS-colonized pregnant women for inclusion. The risk of EOGBS in settings without an IAP policy was 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], .6%-1.5%). As IAP increased, the risk of EOGBS decreased, with a linear association. Based on linear regression, the risk of EOGBS in settings with 80% IAP coverage was predicted to be 0.3% (95% CI, 0-.9). Conclusions The risk of EOGBS among GBS-colonized pregnant women, from this first systematic review, is consistent with previous estimates from single studies (1%-2%). Increasing IAP coverage was linearly associated with decreased risk of EOGBS disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal J Russell
- Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.,King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna C Seale
- Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.,College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
| | - Catherine O'Sullivan
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, United Kingdom.,Centre for International Child Health, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul T Heath
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's, University of London, United Kingdom
| | - Joy E Lawn
- Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
| | - Linda Bartlett
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Clare Cutland
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, and Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Michael Gravett
- Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Margaret Ip
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong
| | - Shabir A Madhi
- Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, and Department of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa.,National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Craig E Rubens
- Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle
| | | | - Stephanie Schrag
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Carol J Baker
- Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bianco A, Larosa E, Pileggi C, Pavia M. Appropriateness of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Neonatal Group B Streptococcus Disease. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0166179. [PMID: 27861568 PMCID: PMC5115703 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of this study were to describe the adherence to CDC guidelines for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) and to identify possible factors influencing noncompliance with guidelines. We conducted a retrospective study in Italy. Our cohort included women in whom antenatal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) screening was not performed, was performed, but results were not available at the time of labor or delivery and women who were positive for GBS colonization. The indications for complete execution of IAP according to revised CDC guidelines was evaluated. It was considered adequate when performed with a recommended antibiotic at least four hours prior to delivery. The cohort included 902 women. Among those who had performed rectal and vaginal swabs (or recto-vaginal swabs), results were available in 86.9% of vaginal swabs and in 87.1% of rectal swabs and GBS was detected in 59.8% of vaginal swabs and in 71% of rectal swabs. 49.2% women had indication for GBS prophylaxis. Among these, 91.1% received an antibiotic during labor. Totally appropriate IAP was performed in 36.3% deliveries, an inappropriate antibiotic was administered in 10.4% women, the remaining 45.3% women received partially appropriate IAP; of these, 15.5% had received antibiotics through an inappropriate route of administration, 18.2% an inappropriate dosage regimen. Overall, 27.5% women received intrapartum ampicillin with inappropriate timing. Multivariate analysis showed that totally appropriate prophylaxis was significantly more likely in women who had no previous live birth, who had vaginal delivery, and a positive result at antenatal GBS screening. Despite satisfactory GBS screening implementation, there is still a substantial gap between optimal and actual IAP. We hypothesize that the complexity of the CDC guidelines may partially explain this shortcoming. Future efforts will include initiatives focused at enabling and reinforcing adherence to evidence-based prevention practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aida Bianco
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Larosa
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Claudia Pileggi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Maria Pavia
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prevalence of early-onset neonatal infection among newborns of mothers with bacterial infection or colonization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15:118. [PMID: 25886298 PMCID: PMC4364328 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-0813-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although neonatal infections cause a significant proportion of deaths in the first week of life, little is known about the burden of neonatal disease originating from maternal infection or colonization globally. This paper describes the prevalence of vertical transmission--the percentage of newborns with neonatal infection among newborns exposed to maternal infection. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and WHO Regional Databases for studies of maternal infection, vertical transmission, and neonatal infection. Studies that measured prevalence of bacterial vertical transmission were included. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool data to calculate prevalence estimates of vertical transmission. RESULTS 122 studies met the inclusion criteria. Only seven studies (5.7%) were from very high neonatal mortality settings. Considerable heterogeneity existed between studies given the various definitions of infection (lab-confirmed, clinical signs), colonization, and risk factors of infection. The prevalence of early onset neonatal lab-confirmed infection among newborns of mothers with lab-confirmed infection was 17.2% (95%CI 6.5-27.9). The prevalence of neonatal lab-confirmed infection among newborns of colonized mothers was 0% (95% CI 0.0-0.0). The prevalence of neonatal surface colonization among newborns of colonized mothers ranged from 30.9-45.5% depending on the organism. The prevalence of neonatal lab-confirmed infection among newborns of mothers with risk factors (premature rupture of membranes, preterm premature rupture of membranes, prolonged rupture of membranes) ranged from 2.9-19.2% depending on the risk factor. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of early-onset neonatal infection is high among newborns of mothers with infection or risk factors for infection. More high quality studies are needed particularly in high neonatal mortality settings to accurately estimate the prevalence of early-onset infection among newborns at risk.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahmadzia HK, Heine RP. Diagnosis and management of group B streptococcus in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41:629-47. [PMID: 25454995 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Group B streptococcus (GBS) can cause significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. Over the past 30 years, reductions in early-onset GBS neonatal sepsis in the United States have been attributable to the guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for antepartum screening and treating this organism during labor. This article highlights the clinical implications, screening, diagnosis, prophylactic interventions, and future therapies for mothers with GBS during the peripartum period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Homa K Ahmadzia
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3967, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - R Phillips Heine
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC 3967, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus: has the time come to wait more than 4 hours? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:15-7. [PMID: 24315859 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2013] [Revised: 11/10/2013] [Accepted: 12/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite progress in preventing infant group B streptococcal disease, group B streptococcus remains the leading cause of early-onset neonatal sepsis in the United States. Fortunately, most women who are colonized with group B streptococcus receive therapy and antibiotic prophylaxis is effective. However, the only factor associated with missed chemoprophylaxis is the short duration of time between hospital admission and delivery. Although antibiotic prophylaxis given for at least 2 hours shows some pharmacological benefit, the most effective method of preventing early-onset group B streptococcus disease is 4 hours of therapy. Intrapartum management strategies might be modified to improve the efficacy of antibiotic exposure. Obstetricians should consider strengthening the beneficial effect of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for infants exposed to group B streptococcus by providing at least 4 hours of treatment coverage.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chan GJ, Lee ACC, Baqui AH, Tan J, Black RE. Risk of early-onset neonatal infection with maternal infection or colonization: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2013; 10:e1001502. [PMID: 23976885 PMCID: PMC3747995 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2012] [Accepted: 07/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neonatal infections cause a significant proportion of deaths in the first week of life, yet little is known about risk factors and pathways of transmission for early-onset neonatal sepsis globally. We aimed to estimate the risk of neonatal infection (excluding sexually transmitted diseases [STDs] or congenital infections) in the first seven days of life among newborns of mothers with bacterial infection or colonization during the intrapartum period. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the World Health Organization Regional Databases for studies of maternal infection, vertical transmission, and neonatal infection published from January 1, 1960 to March 30, 2013. Studies were included that reported effect measures on the risk of neonatal infection among newborns exposed to maternal infection. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool data and calculate the odds ratio estimates of risk of infection. Eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies (8.4%) were from high neonatal mortality settings. Considerable heterogeneity existed between studies given the various definitions of laboratory-confirmed and clinical signs of infection, as well as for colonization and risk factors. The odds ratio for neonatal lab-confirmed infection among newborns of mothers with lab-confirmed infection was 6.6 (95% CI 3.9-11.2). Newborns of mothers with colonization had a 9.4 (95% CI 3.1-28.5) times higher odds of lab-confirmed infection than newborns of non-colonized mothers. Newborns of mothers with risk factors for infection (defined as prelabour rupture of membranes [PROM], preterm <37 weeks PROM, and prolonged ROM) had a 2.3 (95% CI 1.0-5.4) times higher odds of infection than newborns of mothers without risk factors. CONCLUSIONS Neonatal infection in the first week of life is associated with maternal infection and colonization. High-quality studies, particularly from settings with high neonatal mortality, are needed to determine whether targeting treatment of maternal infections or colonization, and/or prophylactic antibiotic treatment of newborns of high risk mothers, may prevent a significant proportion of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace J Chan
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Horváth B, Grasselly M, Bödecs T, Boncz I, Bódis J. Screening pregnant women for group B streptococcus infection between 30 and 32 weeks of pregnancy in a population at high risk for premature birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 122:9-12. [PMID: 23579102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2012] [Revised: 01/09/2013] [Accepted: 03/11/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the benefits of a chemoprophylaxis program based on screening women for group B streptococcus (GBS) infection between 30 and 32 weeks of pregnancy in a population with a high rate of premature births. METHODS From 1995 to 2011, 24 950 women were screened for GBS infection between 30 and 32 weeks of pregnancy at Markusovszky Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary. Those who tested positive, and those who tested negative but were at risk of infecting their newborns, underwent intrapartum prophylaxis. Neonatal outcomes were compared with those of a historical cohort that underwent no screening or treatment, and with those published in CDC/ACOG guidelines recommending screening closer to term. RESULTS There were 63 infected newborns (0.2%) in the study cohort, and 1 of 8 with sepsis died. There were 149 infected newborns (0.7%) in the historical cohort, and 29 of 31 with sepsis died. CONCLUSION Screening women early in a population with a high rate of premature births may simplify preterm labor management. It results, however, in a higher incidence of early onset neonatal GBS disease than when screening is done closer to term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boldizsar Horváth
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Szombathely, Hungary; Markusovszky Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Duration of intrapartum antibiotics for group B streptococcus on the diagnosis of clinical neonatal sepsis. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2013; 2013:525878. [PMID: 23606801 PMCID: PMC3625608 DOI: 10.1155/2013/525878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2012] [Accepted: 03/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Infants born to mothers who are colonized with group B streptococcus (GBS) but received <4 hours of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) are at-risk for presenting later with sepsis. We assessed if <4 hours of maternal IAP for GBS are associated with an increased incidence of clinical neonatal sepsis. Materials and Methods. A retrospective cohort study of women-infant dyads undergoing IAP for GBS at ≥37-week gestation who presented in labor from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2007 was performed. Infants diagnosed with clinical sepsis by the duration of maternal IAP received (< or ≥4-hours duration) were determined. Results. More infants whose mothers received <4 hours of IAP were diagnosed with clinical sepsis, 13 of 1,149 (1.1%) versus 15 of 3,633 (0.4%), P = .03. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that treatment with ≥4 hours of IAP reduced the risk of infants being diagnosed with clinical sepsis by 65%, adjusted relative risk 0.35, CI 0.16–0.79, and P = .01. Conclusion. The rate of neonatal clinical sepsis is increased in newborns of GBS colonized mothers who receive <4 hours compared to ≥4 hours of IAP.
Collapse
|
11
|
Evaluation of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal infection. J Infect Chemother 2012; 18:853-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s10156-012-0426-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2012] [Accepted: 04/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
12
|
Berardi A, Rossi C, Biasini A, Minniti S, Venturelli C, Ferrari F, Facchinetti F. Efficacy of intrapartum chemoprophylaxis less than 4 hours duration. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 24:619-625. [PMID: 20828241 DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2010.511347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current guidelines for prevention of group B streptococcus (GBS) early-onset infection recommend to administer antibiotic during labor at least 4 h prior to delivery (adequate prophylaxis). We aimed to determine if neonatal GBS colonization may be significantly decreased in case of inadequate (<4 h) duration of ampicillin prophylaxis. METHODS In prospective, cohort study, 167 infants born to 167 GBS culture-positive mothers without additional risk factors were enrolled. Cultures were collected both, at 10-24 h after birth (admission) and at discharge. RESULTS Among 137 infants born to mothers who received inadequate prophylaxis, 5 (3.6%, C.I. = 0.5-6.8) were colonized (≥1 sites) at admission, at discharge, or both, at admission and discharge. Eighty-two women received prophylaxis <2 h before delivery and two infants (2.4%) were colonized at discharge. Eighteen (60.0%, C.I. = 42.5-77.5) of 30 infants who were not exposed to prophylaxis were colonized at admission or both, at admission and discharge. Colonization was significantly more frequent among infants born to untreated mothers with respect to infants born to women who received inadequate prophylaxis (either <2 or <4 h). CONCLUSIONS In this selected group, inadequate prophylaxis significantly interrupted vertical colonization. This effect was evident even if prophylaxis started <2 h before delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Berardi
- Unità Operativa di Neonatologia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cortet M, Dupont C, Prunaret-Julien V, Fernandez MP, Peigne E, Huissoud C, Rudigoz RC. [Evolution of adherence to guidelines for prevention of group B streptococcal infections]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 39:569-74. [PMID: 20870364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2010] [Revised: 06/28/2010] [Accepted: 07/27/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assess the evolution in implementation of neonatal group B streptococcal infections prevention program in the Aurore network, between 2004 and 2009. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted during one week in the whole maternity units of the Aurore network about implementation of the neonatal streptococcal infection prevention program. Deliveries occurring after 37 weeks of gestation were included. Every stage required by the prevention program was registered for every delivery. Results obtained during this study were compared with those obtained in 2004. RESULTS Seven hundred and forty-four patients were included in 2004 and 618 in 2009. Vaginal swab rate was 96.3% in 2009 and 91.1% in 2004 (P<0.001), with a positive rate of 10.2 and 14.2%, respectively (P=0.041). Antibiotic infusion rates during delivery did not increase significantly. Clinical and biological surveillance of exposed newborns was significantly increased (P<0.001). No neonatal infection was observed during the study among newborns included in the program. CONCLUSION Sensitization of caregivers about neonatal streptococcal infection prevention seems to be efficient to increase the application of the prevention program written by the Aurore network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Cortet
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 103, grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004 Lyon cedex 04, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tzialla C, Borghesi A, Garofoli F, Bollani L, Longo S, Stronati M. Prevention of early onset group B streptococcal disease: controversial issues. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 22 Suppl 3:38-42. [PMID: 19718586 DOI: 10.1080/14767050903211521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Intrapartum chemoprophylaxis is currently the most effective preventive strategy against the neonatal early-onset group B streptococcal infection. The principal controversies on strategies for intrapartum antibiotic administration, possible adverse effects, management of newborn and possible future preventive strategies reported in the literature are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chryssoula Tzialla
- Neonatologia, Patologia Neonatale e Terapia Intensiva, Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koenig JM, Keenan WJ. Group B streptococcus and early-onset sepsis in the era of maternal prophylaxis. Pediatr Clin North Am 2009; 56:689-708, Table of Contents. [PMID: 19501699 PMCID: PMC2702484 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2009.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Despite an era of marked success with universal screening, Group B Streptococcus (GBS) continues to be an important cause of early-onset sepsis, and thus remains a significant public health issue. Improved eradication of GBS colonization and disease may involve universal screening in conjunction with rapid diagnostic technologies or other novel approaches. Given the complications and potential limitations associated with maternal intrapartum prophylaxis, however, vaccines may be the most effective means of preventing neonatal GBS disease. The global utility of conjugated GBS vaccines may be hampered by the variability of serotypes in diverse populations and geographic locations. Modern technologies, such as those involving proteomics and genomic sequencing, are likely to hasten the development of a universal vaccine against GBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce M Koenig
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO 63104, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thibaudon Baveux C, Stroebel Noguer A, Boulard Mallet I, Djavadzadeh-Amini M, Kacet N, Truffert P, Subtil D, Dubos JP. Prévention des infections bactériennes néonatales précoces à streptocoque B. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 37:392-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2007] [Revised: 10/10/2007] [Accepted: 12/05/2007] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|