Incidence and risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in twin versus singleton pregnancies

Management of twin pregnancies: Remaining challenges and unanswered questions

Several professional societies have published guidelines on twin pregnancies over the past few years. These documents provide recommendations on antenatal surveillance and management of twin pregnancies. At the same time, these guidelines identify several key areas where evidence is limited and additional research is needed. In the present review, we summarize available evidence regarding some of these key areas, including the screening and prevention of preterm birth, the definition and management of fetal growth restriction, the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes, the optimal maternal gestational weight gain, and the mode and timing of delivery. In addition, we describe several online tools related to these areas that can empower individuals with twin pregnancies and assist care providers in counseling these patients.

Association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index and gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Limited research has examined the potential association between triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The objective of this investigation was to analyze this linkage and evaluate TyG-BMI's capability to predict GDM.

METHODS

This research employed secondary data derived from a prospective cohort in South Korea, which included 588 pregnant women with singleton gestations, collected between November 2014 and July 2016. To investigate the connection between TyG-BMI and GDM, logistic regression and sensitivity analyses were performed. Furthermore, an analysis of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was conducted to assess the prognostic accuracy of TyG-BMI in relation to GDM.

RESULTS

The cohort exhibited a mean age of 32.07 ± 3.80 years, with 36 individuals (6.12%) manifesting GDM during the interval of 24 to 28 weeks of gestation. Following the adjustment for possible confounding variables, an increased TyG-BMI was associated with an elevated risk of GDM, as indicated by an odds ratio (OR) of 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01-1.04). Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) for TyG-BMI's predictive performance was recorded at 0.7979 (0.7143-0.8814), with an optimal threshold established at 211.03, which resulted in a specificity of 86.23% and a sensitivity of 66.67%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this South Korean cohort, increased TyG-BMI during early pregnancy (10-14 weeks) was significantly associated with the onset of GDM (during pregnancy 24-28 weeks). TyG-BMI could be integrated into clinical practice as a complementary preliminary screening tool for detecting women who are at increased risk of GDM.

Paradox in the research of gestational diabetes mellitus and twin pregnancies: Perspective and future directions

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is well known to be associated with fetal overgrowth and short- or long-term adverse outcomes in singleton pregnancies; however, its relationship with twin pregnancies remains controversial, posing challenges for clinical management. Despite the heterogeneity in GDM diagnosis and racial differences among populations, two critical issues remain unaddressed. The first issue is methodological, specifically whether data on twins have been analyzed using appropriate approaches. The second issue is the underlying pathophysiology'. Given that both glucose demand and insulin resistance are elevated in twin pregnancies, the optimal level of maternal insulin secretion remains uncertain. In this paper, we summarize the current knowledge on GDM in the context of twin pregnancies, their perinatal outcomes, glucose control, and gestational weight gain management. We then propose methodological considerations for future improvements. Ultimately, we underscore the importance of delving into the glucose requirements of twin pregnancies to gain a profound understanding of their gestational glucose and insulin metabolism. All these questions are key issues in this area, and by answering them we will accelerate the development of high-quality, evidence-based clinical guidelines for GDM management in twin pregnancies.

Ozone Exposure and Gestational Diabetes in Twin Pregnancies: Exploring Critical Windows and Synergistic Risks

The relationship between ozone (O3) exposure and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies remains unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the association between O3 exposure and GDM risk in twin pregnancies, and to explore the synergistic effects of O3 exposure with other maternal factors. A total of 428 pregnancies recruited from a prospective twin cohort were included. Cox proportional hazard models with distributed lag non-linear models (DLNMs) were applied to examine the associations between O3 exposure and the risk of GDM and to identify the critical windows. The multiplicative and additive interaction were further analyzed to test the synergistic effects. A 10 μg/m3 increase in average O3 exposure during the 12 weeks before pregnancy was associated with a 26% higher risk of GDM. The critical windows were identified in the period from the 3rd week before gestation to the 2nd gestational week as well as from the 17th to 19th gestational week. There were synergistic effects between high O3 exposure during preconception and advanced maternal age, and a history of preterm birth/abortion/stillbirth. Periconceptional O3 exposure could increase the risk of GDM in twin pregnancy women, and the synergism of O3 exposure with certain GDM risk factors was observed.

National, state and territory trends in gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia, 2016-2021: Differences by state/territory and country of birth

OBJECTIVE

To examine trends of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Australia by state/territory and country of birth.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was undertaken from 2016 to 2021 using data from the National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS) and Australian Bureau of Statistics. The trends were assessed using Average Annual Percentage Changes (AAPCs) and the Cochrane-Armitage test.

RESULTS

Nationally, the age-standardised incidence of GDM was 9.3% (95%CI; 9.1-9.4) in 2016 and 15.7% (95%CI; 15.4-15.9) in 2021, representing AAPC of +10.9%. The highest increase was in the Northern Territory, from 6.7% (95%CI; 5.1-8.3) in 2016 to 19.2% (95%CI; 16.9-21.6) in 2021, AAPC=+24.6%. In Southeast Asian-born women, the incidence of GDM rose from 12.2% (95%CI; 11.7-12.7) in 2016 to 22.5% (95%CI; 21.9-23.2) in 2021 (p-trend<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of GDM has risen in Australia, particularly in the Northern Territory and Victoria, as well as among those born in Southeast Asia and South and Central Asia.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

This increase in GDM incidence in Australia underscores the pressing need for location and culturally responsive GDM prevention interventions. The lack of information on some risk factors of GDM (e.g. high body mass index) in the NDSS registry requires further investigation.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: New Thinking on Diagnostic Criteria

Currently, there is a lack of standardized diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), making it a subject of ongoing debate. The optimal diagnostic method and screening strategy for GDM remain contentious. In this review, we summarize the criteria and methods for diagnosing GDM, and perform a comparison between universal and selective screening strategies. Therefore, this review aims to highlight the following: (1) The most widely adopted criteria for GDM are those established by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG). (2) Evidence from cohort studies suggests that the one-step diagnostic method is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes and appears more cost-effective compared to the two-step method. (3) Universal screening is more cost-effective than selective screening, which may overlook a significant number of women with GDM. Additionally, various methods have been proposed for early pregnancy screening (before 14 weeks). Finally, an outlook is presented for the diagnosis of GDM, emphasizing the importance of large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide stronger evidence for future support.

Risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery (CD) between patients with twin and singleton pregnancies undergoing a trial of labor and identify risk factors for intrapartum CD in twin pregnancies.

METHODS

The present study was a retrospective cohort study of patients with a twin or singleton pregnancy who underwent a trial of labor at ≥340/7 weeks in a single center (2015-2022). The primary outcome was the rate of intrapartum CD. In twin pregnancies, this outcome was limited to CD of both twins. The association of plurality with intrapartum CD was estimated using multivariable Poisson regression.

RESULTS

A total of 20 754 patients met the study criteria, 669 of whom had a twin pregnancy. Patients with twins had a greater risk of intrapartum CD (of both twins) than those with singleton pregnancies (22.1% vs 15.9%, respectively; aRR 1.38 [95% CI: 1.15-1.66]), primarily due to a greater risk of failure to progress. In addition, 4.1% of the twin pregnancies had a CD for the second twin, resulting in an overall CD rate in twin pregnancies of 26.2%. Variables associated with intrapartum CD in twin pregnancies included nulliparity (aOR 3.50, 95% CI: 2.34-5.25), birthweight discordance >20% (aOR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.27-4.78), and labor induction (aOR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.07-2.53). The rate of intrapartum CD was highest when all three risk factors were present (67% [95% CI: 41%-87%]).

CONCLUSION

Twin pregnancies are associated with a greater risk of intrapartum CD than singleton pregnancies. Information on the individualized risk of intrapartum CD may be valuable when counseling patients with twins regarding mode of delivery.

Risk Stratification in Twin Pregnancies Complicated by GDM

Aims: This study was aimed at assessing the association of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) glucose threshold levels and the requirement of insulin therapy in twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods: In this post hoc analysis of a cohort study spanning 18 years, 446 patients with twin pregnancy and GDM (246 managed with lifestyle modification and 200 requiring pharmacotherapy) were included. We collected and evaluated maternal characteristics, as well as fasting, 1-h, and 2-h glucose concentrations from a standardized 75-g OGTT. The assessment methods included logistic regression analysis, positive and negative predictive values, area under the curve (AUC), and random forest analysis. Results: The fasting (p < 0.01, OR: 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.05]) and 1-h (p < 0.01; OR: 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.02]) glucose levels during the OGTT were significantly associated with the subsequent need for insulin therapy, with thresholds of 95 mg/dL for fasting glucose and 184 mg/dL for the 1-h OGTT. Additionally, indications for insulin therapy were marked by thresholds of 108 mg/dL at G0, 215 mg/dL at G60, and 86 mg/dL at G120. Conclusion: Identifying threshold values for insulin therapy and risk stratification in twin pregnancy are crucial for optimal patient management.

Greater risk of type 2 diabetes progression in multifetal gestations with gestational diabetes: the impact of obesity

BACKGROUND

The relationship between gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse outcomes in multifetal pregnancies is complex and controversial. Moreover, limited research has focused on the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus specifically in multifetal pregnancies, resulting in conflicting results from existing studies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus between singleton and multifetal pregnancies in a large cohort of parturients with a 5-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted on a prospective cohort of pregnant individuals with pregnancies between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, followed up to 5 years after delivery. Glucose levels during pregnancy were obtained from the Meuhedet Health Maintenance Organization laboratory system and cross-linked with the Israeli National Diabetes Registry. The cohort was divided into 4 groups: singleton pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus, multifetal pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus, and multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus. Gestational diabetes mellitus was defined according to the American Diabetes Association criteria using the 2-step strategy. Univariate analyses, followed by survival analysis that included Kaplan-Meier hazard curves and Cox proportional-hazards models, were used to assess differences between groups and calculate the adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Among 88,611 parturients, 61,891 cases met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 6.5% in the singleton pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group and 9.4% in the multifetal pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus group. Parturients with gestational diabetes mellitus, regardless of plurality, were older and had higher fasting plasma glucose levels in the first trimester of pregnancy. The rates of increased body mass index, hypertension, and earlier gestational age at delivery were significantly higher in the gestational diabetes mellitus group among patients with singleton pregnancies but not among patients with multifetal pregnancies. Survival analysis demonstrated that gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with adjusted hazard ratios of type 2 diabetes mellitus of 4.62 (95% confidence interval, 3.69-5.78) in singleton pregnancies and 9.26 (95% confidence interval, 2.67-32.01) in multifetal pregnancies (P<.001 for both). Stratified analysis based on obesity status revealed that, in parturients without obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies increased the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus by 10.24 (95% confidence interval, 6.79-15.44; P<.001) compared with a nonsignificant risk in multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 9.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-90.22; P=.059). Among parturients with obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus for both singleton and multifetal pregnancies (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.66; [95% confidence interval, 2.81-4.67; P<.001] and 9.31 [95% confidence interval, 2.12-40.76; P=.003], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared with gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes mellitus in multifetal pregnancies doubles the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus. This effect is primarily observed in patients with obesity. Our findings underscore the importance of providing special attention and postpartum follow-up for patients with multifetal pregnancies and gestational diabetes mellitus, especially those with obesity, to enable early diagnosis and intervention for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies-a pathology requiring treatment or a benign physiological adaptation?

There is level-1 evidence that screening for and treating gestational diabetes in singleton pregnancies reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity. However, similar data for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies are currently lacking. Consequently, the current approach for the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies is based on the same diagnostic criteria and glycemic targets used in singleton pregnancies. However, twin pregnancies have unique physiological characteristics, and many of the typical gestational diabetes-related complications are less relevant for twin pregnancies. These differences raise the question of whether the greater increase in insulin resistance observed in twin pregnancies (which is often diagnosed as diet-treated gestational diabetes) should be considered physiological and potentially beneficial in which case alternative criteria should be used for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies. In this review, we summarize the most up-to-date evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical consequences of gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies and review the available data on twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes. Although twin pregnancies are associated with a higher incidence of diet-treated gestational diabetes, diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies is less likely to be associated with adverse outcomes and accelerated fetal growth than in singleton pregnancies and may reduce the risk for intrauterine growth restriction. In addition, there is currently no evidence that treatment of diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies improves outcomes, whereas preliminary data suggest that strict glycemic control in such cases might increase the risk for intrauterine growth restriction. Overall, these findings provide support to the hypothesis that the greater transient increase in insulin resistance observed in twin pregnancies is merely a physiological exaggeration of the normal increase in insulin resistance observed in singleton pregnancies (that is meant to support 2 fetuses) rather than a pathology that requires treatment. These data illustrate the need to develop twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes to avoid overdiagnosis of gestational diabetes and to reduce the risks associated with overtreatment of diet-treated gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies. Although data on twin-specific screening and diagnostic criteria are presently scarce, preliminary data suggest that the optimal screening and diagnostic criteria in twin pregnancies are higher than those currently used in singleton pregnancies.

Outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies with fused versus separate placentas

PURPOSE

In a certain proportion of dichorionic twin pregnancies, the two placentas are fused. The clinical significance of this finding remains unclear. Our objective was to compare outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies with fused versus separate placentas as determined on first-trimester ultrasound.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients with dichorionic twins followed at a tertiary center between 2014 and 2022. The co-primary outcomes were fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia. Associations between fused placentas and the study outcomes were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression and were reported as adjusted relative risk (aRR) with a 95%-confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Of the 328 eligible patients, 175 (53.4%) and 153 (46.6%) had fused and separate placentas, respectively. Compared with pregnancies with separate placentas, patients with fused placentas had a lower risk of preeclampsia [aRR 0.48 (95%-CI 0.24-0.97)] but a higher risk of fetal growth restriction [aRR 1.23 (95%-CI 1.02-1.48)] and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit [aRR 1.31 (95%-CI 1.01-1.71)]. In addition, pregnancies with fused placentas were more likely to have a total placental weight below the 10th percentile than those with separate placentas [aRR 1.93 (95%-CI 1.16-3.21)].

DISCUSSION

Dichorionic twin pregnancies with fused placentas have a lower risk of preeclampsia but are more likely to be complicated by fetal growth restriction, observations that may be attributed to the lower total placentas mass in pregnancies with fused compared with separate placentas. Fused placentas can be used as a potential biomarker for the prediction of pregnancy complications in dichorionic twin pregnancies.

Chorionicity and gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies in relation to placental weight

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance first detected during pregnancy. Twin pregnancies have a higher risk of GDM, likely due to increased placental mass and elevated placental lactogen levels.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were 1) to assess the impact of chorionicity on the development of GDM in twin pregnancies and 2) to assess a possible association between placenta weight and the development of GDM.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of all women with twin pregnancies (N = 819) at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lillebaelt University Hospital, Kolding, Denmark, between January 1, 2007 and April 30, 2019. Information on chronicity was determined at the first visit with ultrasonic imaging, during weeks' gestation 11-13. Oral glucose-tolerance test was performed to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Among 819 twins, 17.8 % were monochorionic twins and 82.2 % were dichorionic twins. There were no statistically significant difference of GDM prevalence between monochorionic twins group 7.4 % and dichorionic twins group 9.8 % (P = 0.42). Placenta's weight in dichorionic twins was larger compared with monochorionic twins. No association was found between the weight of placenta and the prevalence of GDM (P = 0.21), even after adjustment for body mass index, gestational age, and fertility treatment (P = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study could not find an association between chorionicity, placental weight, and GDM. It is, therefore, possible that twin pregnancies, regardless of chorionicity and placental weight, have the same risk for GDM.

Twin Pregnancy Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Context

The risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies is more than double that of singleton pregnancies. Although twin pregnancies present unique challenges for fetal growth and prenatal management, the approach to GDM diagnosis and treatment is the same regardless of plurality. Data on pregnancy outcomes for individuals with GDM and a twin pregnancy are limited and conflicting.

Objective

To describe the maternal characteristics associated with GDM in twin pregnancies and to assess the associated pregnancy outcomes compared to twin pregnancies unaffected by GDM.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, and included predominantly Causasian women aged 18 to 45 years who received prenatal care for a twin pregnancy from 2017-2022. Maternal characteristics and a broad spectrum of pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Universal GDM screening involved a 50 g oral glucose challenge test +/- a 100 g oral glucose tolerance test.

Results

GDM was diagnosed in 23% pregnancies (n = 104/452). Compared to those without, women with GDM had known risk factors including a higher prepregnancy body mass index (31.1vs 26.3 kg/m2; P < .01) and a prior history of GDM (21.7 vs 5.9%; P < .01). There were no differences in maternal pregnancy complications or neonatal outcomes between groups. Attendance at postpartum glucose testing among women with GDM was poor at 27.9% (29/104).

Conclusion

These data suggest that women with twin pregnancies share a similar GDM risk profile to those with singleton pregnancies and provide reassuring evidence that current management for GDM twin pregnancies produces similar outcomes to twin pregnancies without GDM.

The Association of Twin Chorionicity with Maternal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to investigate the association between maternal outcomes and twin chorionicity in a large, contemporary obstetric population.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single, large tertiary care center. Prenatal and inpatient records for all individuals with twin gestations were reviewed from 2000 to 2016. Patients with monoamniotic twins, higher-order multiples reduced to twins, multiple sets of twins in the study period, or undetermined chorionicity were excluded. Patients with monochorionic twins were compared with those with dichorionic twins. The co-primary outcomes were gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and other maternal outcomes. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess associations of chorionicity with maternal outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 2,979 patients eligible for inclusion, 2,627 (88.2%) had dichorionic twin gestations and 352 (11.8%) had monochorionic twin gestations. Patients with monochorionic twins were less likely to self-identify as non-Hispanic White and to have conceived via assisted reproductive technology but were more likely to be publicly insured, multiparous and have prenatal care with a maternal-fetal medicine provider. Neither gestational diabetes mellitus (6.8% monochorionic vs. 6.2% dichorionic, p = 0.74; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.86) nor hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (21.9% monochorionic vs. 26.3% dichorionic, p = 0.09; adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.71-1.38) differed by chorionicity. Of the secondary maternal outcomes, patients with monochorionic twins experienced a lower frequency of cesarean delivery (46.0 vs. 61.8%, p < 0.001), which persisted after multivariate analyses (adjusted OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.80). There were no differences in preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, hemorrhage, hysterectomy, or intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

The odds of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy do not appear to differ by twin chorionicity.

KEY POINTS

· Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy do not differ by twin chorionicity.. · Gestational diabetes mellitus does not differ by twin chorionicity.. · Maternal outcomes are similar for individuals with monochorionic and dichorionic twin gestations..

Exploration of Serum lipid levels during twin pregnancy

Objective: This study aims to characterize changes in serum lipid levels throughout twin pregnancies and explore the relationship between lipid levels and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy (HDCP).Methods: We retrospectively studied 297 twin pregnancies of women who received regular prenatal care and delivered at the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital over a period of two years. Demographic and medical data of the participants were collected by questionnaires and medical records review. Serum lipid levels were measured in the first trimester (6-13 weeks), second trimester (24-28 weeks), and third trimester (34-37 weeks). A multivariate regression model was constructed to examine the association between lipid levels and pregnancy complications. A decision tree was used to explore the relationship between early serum lipid glucose levels and GDM and HDCP in twin pregnancies.Results: Triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels increased significantly from the first trimester to the third trimester, with the exception of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), which decreased in the third trimester in twin pregnancies (p < 0.001). The levels of TC in the GDM and HDCP group were significantly elevated compared to those in the normal group in early pregnancies (p < 0.05, p < 0.05). In the second trimester, TG in the HDCP group was substantially higher than that in the normal group (p = 0.01). In the third trimester, LDL-C and HDL-C levels in the GDM group are significantly lower than that in the normal group (p < 0.05, p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, body mass index (BMI) is independently associated with GDM (odds ratio [OR] = 1.129, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.007-1.266) and HDCP(odds ratio [OR] = 1.170, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.031-1.329). The variation amplitude of HDL-C in the third trimester is related to the occurrence of GDM and HDCP(GDM:OR = 0.271, 95%CI: 0.095-0.778; HDCP: OR =0.249, 95% CI: 0.075-0.823). TG and TC levels in DCDA twins were significantly higher than that in MCDA twins in the first trimester(TG: p < 0.05, TC: p < 0.05). In the decision tree model for GDM, fasting blood glucose in the first trimester (FBG), TC, and pre-pregnancy BMI were identified as important nodes, while in the HDCP model, pre-pregnancy BMI, TC, and TG were key nodes.Conclusion: Serum lipid levels in twin pregnancies increase gradually during pregnancy. BMI is independently associated with the occurrence of GDM and HDCP. HDL-C may serve as a protective factor for GDM and HDCP. The predictive effect of early blood lipid on GDM and HDCP in twin pregnancy needs further study.

Fetal sex and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus in gravidae with multiple gestation pregnancies

INTRODUCTION

There is an increasing incidence of pregnancies with twin gestations. One outcome more likely to occur with multiple gestations is gestational diabetes mellitus. Studies have suggested that in singleton pregnancies, fetal sex may affect insulin resistance. However, the effects of fetal sex in twins and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus are unknown. We hypothesized that rates of gestational diabetes mellitus and degree of insulin resistance might vary in twin gestations based on the fetal sex pairing: male-male, male-female or female-female. We aimed to employ a large population-based database to ascertain any correlations between fetal sex and gestational diabetes mellitus in multifetal gestations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A two-hospital, single academic institution database comprised of over 39 000 participants with pregnancy data from August 2011 to January 2022 was employed. All twin deliveries of live-born neonates >24 weeks' gestational age from gravidae without preexisting diabetes or twin-twin transfusion syndrome were included. Entries were then grouped based on the fetal sex of the pairing. The presence or absence of gestational diabetes and type of gestational diabetes - diet-controlled (gestational diabetes mellitus classification A1) vs medication-controlled (gestational diabetes mellitus classification A2) - were identified. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear mixed method, and a P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We identified 1924 twin deliveries that met the inclusion criteria in our database (male-male =652; male-female = 638; female-female = 634). We found no association between fetal sex pairing and the development of gestational diabetes mellitus. There was a significant association between the fetal sex pairing and the type of gestational diabetes mellitus developed, with 32.0% of male-male twins, 33.3% of male-female twins and 58.3% of the female-female twin deliveries associated with medication-controlled gestational diabetes classification A2: male-female vs female-female (P = 0.05) and male-male vs female-female (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

While gestational diabetes mellitus is of multifactorial origin, we found a significant association between the fetal sex pairing and the treatment needed for gravidae with twins who develop gestational diabetes mellitus. A higher proportion of female-female twins was associated with gestational diabetes classification A2 compared with male-female or male-male deliveries. Further research on the physiology driving this association is warranted.

Glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Preliminary data suggest that strict glycemic control in twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus may not improve outcomes but might increase the risk of fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association of maternal glycemic control with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus-related complications and small for gestational age in twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with a twin pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus in a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2020, and a matched control group of patients with a twin pregnancy without gestational diabetes mellitus in a 1:3 ratio. The exposure was the level of glycemic control, described as the proportion of fasting, postprandial, and overall glucose values within target. Good glycemic control was defined as a proportion of values within target above the 50th percentile. The first coprimary outcome was a composite variable of neonatal morbidity, defined as at least 1 of the following: birthweight >90th centile for gestational age, hypoglycemia requiring treatment, jaundice requiring phototherapy, birth trauma, or admission to the neonatal intensive care unit at term. A second coprimary outcome was small for gestational age, defined as birthweight <10th centile or <3rd centile for gestational age. Associations between the level of glycemic control and the study outcomes were estimated using logistic regression analysis and were expressed as adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with gestational diabetes mellitus in a twin pregnancy met the study criteria. The overall rate of the primary outcome was 32.4% (34/105), and the overall proportion of pregnancies with a small for gestational age newborn at birth was 43.8% (46/105). Good glycemic control was not associated with a reduction in the risk of composite neonatal morbidity when compared with suboptimal glycemic control (32.1% vs 32.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.06 [95% confidence interval, 0.77-5.49]). However, good glycemic control was associated with higher odds of small for gestational age compared with nongestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies, especially in the subgroup of diet-treated gestational diabetes mellitus (65.5% vs 34.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 4.17 [95% confidence interval, 1.74-10.01] for small for gestational age <10th centile; and 24.1% vs 7.0%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.97 [95% confidence interval, 1.42-11.10] for small for gestational age <3rd centile). In contrast, the rate of small for gestational age in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies with suboptimal control was not considerably different when compared with non-gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies. In addition, in cases of diet-treated gestational diabetes mellitus, good glycemic control was associated with a left-shift of the distribution of birthweight centiles, whereas the distribution of birthweight centiles among gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies with suboptimal control was similar to that of nongestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

In patients with gestational diabetes mellitus in a twin pregnancy, good glycemic control is not associated with a reduction in the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus-related complications but may increase the risk of a small for gestational age newborn in the subgroup of patients with mild (diet-treated) gestational diabetes mellitus. These findings further question whether the gestational diabetes mellitus glycemic targets used in singleton pregnancies also apply to twin pregnancies and support the concern that applying the same diagnostic criteria and glycemic targets in twin pregnancies may result in overdiagnosis and overtreatment of gestational diabetes mellitus and potential neonatal harm.

National and international guidelines on the management of twin pregnancies: a comparative review

Twin gestations are associated with increased risk of pregnancy complications. However, high-quality evidence regarding the management of twin pregnancies is limited, often resulting in inconsistencies in the recommendations of various national and international professional societies. In addition, some recommendations related to the management of twin gestations are often missing from the clinical guidelines dedicated to twin pregnancies and are instead included in the practice guidelines on specific pregnancy complications (eg, preterm birth) of the same professional society. This can make it challenging for care providers to easily identify and compare recommendations for the management of twin pregnancies. This study aimed to identify, summarize, and compare the recommendations of selected professional societies from high-income countries on the management of twin pregnancies, highlighting areas of both consensus and controversy. We reviewed clinical practice guidelines of selected major professional societies that were either specific to twin pregnancies or were focused on pregnancy complications or aspects of antenatal care that may be relevant for twin pregnancies. We decided a priori to include clinical guidelines from 7 high-income countries (United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Australia and New Zealand grouped together) and from 2 international societies (International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics). We identified recommendations regarding the following care areas: first-trimester care, antenatal surveillance, preterm birth and other pregnancy complications (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, and gestational diabetes mellitus), and timing and mode of delivery. We identified 28 guidelines published by 11 professional societies from the 7 countries and 2 international societies. Thirteen of these guidelines focus on twin pregnancies, whereas the other 16 focus on specific pregnancy complications predominantly in singletons but also include some recommendations for twin pregnancies. Most of the guidelines are recent, with 15 of the 29 guidelines published over the past 3 years. We identified considerable disagreement among guidelines, primarily in 4 key areas: screening and prevention of preterm birth, using aspirin to prevent preeclampsia, defining fetal growth restriction, and the timing of delivery. In addition, there is limited guidance on several important areas, including the implications of the "vanishing twin" phenomenon, technical aspects and risks of invasive procedures, nutrition and weight gain, physical and sexual activity, the optimal growth chart to be used in twin pregnancies, the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes mellitus, and intrapartum care.This consolidation of key recommendations across several clinical practice guidelines can assist healthcare providers in accessing and comparing recommendations on the management of twin pregnancies and identifies high-priority areas for future research based on either continued disagreement among societies or limited current evidence to guide care.

Clinical Factors for Predicting Pharmacotherapy in Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Controlling blood glucose levels is the main target in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Twin pregnancies are offered the same screening selection and have the same diagnostic criteria as well as treatment of gestational diabetes as singleton pregnancies, even though the risks for pregnancy complications are increased. The aim of this study was to assess the association between predicting factors, OGTT glucose levels and pharmacotherapy requirements in twin pregnancies with GDM. This retrospective cohort study included 446 GDM patients with twin pregnancies (246 managed with lifestyle modifications and 200 requiring pharmacotherapy) over a time period of 18 years. An evaluation of maternal characteristics and a standardized 75 g oral glucose test (OGGT) for glucose concentrations at fasting, 1 h and 2 h were conduced. OGTT glucose levels at fasting (=0 min, p < 0.01) and 1 h (p < 0.01) were significantly associated with the later requirement of pharmacotherapy. Also, clinical risk factors (pre-pregnancy BMI p < 0.01, multiparity p < 0.05, GDM in previous pregnancy p < 0.01, assisted reproduction p < 0.05) showed a predictive accuracy for insulin therapy in twin pregnancies complicated by GDM, whereas age and chorionicity had no effect. OGTT glucose measures in addition to clinical risk factors are promising variables for risk stratification in mothers with GDM and twin pregnancy.

Different subtypes of gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with distinct perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies

AIMS

To determine whether different gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) subtypes are associated with distinct perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies.

MATERIALS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled women with twin pregnancies who gave birth at a tertiary hospital between January 2017 and December 2022. GDM was diagnosed by the IADPSG diagnostic criteria. Three subtypes of GDM were defined as only abnormal fasting glucose (OAFG) values, only abnormal post-load glucose (OAPG) values and abnormal combined fasting and post-load glucose (ACFPG) values. Logistic regression or generalized estimation equation models were used to test the correlation of subtypes of GDM and perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

GDM with OAPG had a slightly higher risk for preterm delivery (PTD) at <37 gestational weeks (aOR 1.22, 95 %CI 1.01-1.47) and neonatalintensivecareunit (NICU) admission (aOR 1.31, 95 %CI 1.09-1.57). GDM with ACFPG were associated with PTD at <37 gestational weeks (aOR 1.42, 95 %CI 1.06-1.89) and PTD at <34 gestational weeks (aOR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.14-2.39). GDM with OAFG had a lower risk of being small-for-gestational age (SGA) (aOR 0.48, 95 % CI 0.26-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Different subtypes of GDM are associated with distinct perinatal outcomes. Only abnormal fasting glucose levels may be responsible for reduced the risk of SGA neonates.

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Worsen Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of Twin Pregnancy

The specific effects of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on twin pregnancy outcomes, which are at high risk per se, are unclear. The present study analyzes outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by GDM (n = 227) by comparing them with GDM singleton pregnancies (n = 1060) and with twin pregnancies without GDM (n = 1008), all followed up at Sant'Anna Hospital, Turin (Italy), between January 2010 and March 2020. The prevalence of GDM among twin pregnancies (n = 1235) was 18.4%. Compared to GDM singletons, GDM twins had higher rates of preeclampsia (aOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.8), cesarean section (aOR 7.5; 95% CI 5.2-10.8), and neonatal hypoglycemia (aOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5.3). They had a higher incidence of abnormal 2 h OGTT values (aOR 7.1; 95% CI: 3.2-15.7) and were less likely to require insulin therapy (aOR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.7). In comparison with twin pregnancies without GDM, women with GDM twins were significantly older (35.0 vs. 33.0 years; p < 0.001) and had higher BMI (23.0 versus 22.0 kg/m²; p < 0.001); they had a higher incidence of LGA newborns (aOR 5.3; 95% CI 1.7-14.8), and lower incidence of low APGAR scores (0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.9). Overall, GDM does not worsen outcomes of twin pregnancy, which is per se at high risk for adverse outcomes.

Adverse obstetric outcomes in women with PCOS and multiple gestations

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does multiple gestation alter the risks for adverse obstetric outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)?

DESIGN

Retrospective population-based cohort study using data from the HCUP-NIS from 2004 to 2014. A total of 14,882 women with PCOS, who delivered within that time period, were identified. The study group comprised women with PCOS who had had a multiple gestation (n = 880); the reference group was comprised of the remaining women with PCOS and singleton gestation (n = 14,002).

RESULTS

In women with PCOS, multiple gestation increased the risks of pregnancy complications including pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.030; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.676-2.460), pre-eclampsia (aOR 2.879; 95% CI 2.277-3.639), pre-eclampsia and eclampsia superimposed on pre-existing hypertension (aOR 1.917; 95% CI 1.266-2.903) and gestational diabetes (aOR 1.358; 95% CI 1.114-1.656). Multiple gestation increases the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes (aOR 5.807; 95% CI 4.153-8.119), preterm delivery (aOR 8.466; 95% CI 7.071-10.135), Caesarean section (aOR 5.146; 95% CI 4.184-6.329), post-partum haemorrhage (aOR 1.540; 95% CI 1.065-2.228) and the need for transfusion (aOR 3.268; 95% CI 2.010-5.314), as well as wound complications (aOR 3.089; 95% CI 1.647-5.794). Neonates born to mothers with PCOS and having multiple gestations are more likely to be small for gestational age when compared to singleton neonates born to mothers with PCOS (aOR 4.606; 95% CI 3.480-6.095). Among PCOS women with multiple gestations, obesity increased the risks of developing pregnancy-induced hypertension (P < 0.001), pre-eclampsia (P < 0.001) and wound complications (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

These results highlight the importance of single embryo transfer and ovulation induction to develop a single follicle in women with PCOS. Obesity further increases obstetrical complications.

Optimal gestational weight gain in women with twin pregnancies and gestational diabetes mellitus: a population-based study in the United States

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence regarding optimal gestational weight gain in women with twin pregnancies and gestational diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association between gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes among women with gestational diabetes mellitus and twin pregnancies and to explore the gestational weight gain targets by prepregnancy body mass index category.

STUDY DESIGN

A national population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus was conducted between 2014 and 2020. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus aged between 18 and 45 years with live-born twins without congenital malformations between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation were included in the analysis. Two approaches were used to determine the optimal gestational weight gain targets by body mass index category: an interquartile range method to calculate targets in low-risk gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies and a logistic model method to identify the odds ratio targets at which a composite adverse outcome decreased.

RESULTS

Of 29,308 women with gestational diabetes mellitus and twin pregnancies, 8239 (28.1%) were normal-weight, 7626 (26.0%) were overweight, and 13,443 (45.9%) were obese. The continuous standardized gestational weight gain by 36 weeks was associated with preterm birth <36 weeks, large-for-gestational-age infants, small-for-gestational-age infants, and gestational hypertensive disorders. The interquartile range targets were 13.6 to 20.9 kg, 10.9 to 20.4 kg, and 7.7 to 17.7 kg for normal-weight, overweight, and obese women, respectively. The odds ratio targets were 14.1 to 20.0 kg, 12.1 to 16.0 kg, and 6.1 to 12.0 kg for normal-weight, overweight, and obese women, respectively. Gestational weight gain outside these targets was associated with preterm birth <36 weeks, large-for-gestational-age and small-for-gestational-age infants, and gestational hypertensive disorders, and exhibited significant population attributable fractions for preterm birth <36 weeks, large-for-gestational-age infants, and gestational hypertensive disorders across body mass index categories.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the Institute of Medicine guidelines, more stringent gestational weight gain targets would be beneficial for improved perinatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and twin pregnancies.

Comparing the course and delivery outcomes of Japanese twin pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus: a single-center retrospective analysis

Singleton pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Multiple pregnancies are associated with increased risks of perinatal complications; however, the impact of GDM on maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancies is unknown, and there are currently few reports on GDM status in twin pregnancies. This study aimed to compare the background and perinatal outcomes between Japanese twin pregnancies with and without GDM at a perinatal center in Japan. Additionally, the clinical course of GDM was investigated. In this retrospective cohort study, women with twin pregnancies underwent GDM screening at Yokohama City University Medical Center from January 2011 to December 2016. Overall, 307 twin pregnancies were divided into GDM (47 cases, 15.3%) and non-GDM (260 cases, 84.7%) groups. GDM-associated pregnancy complications, GDM status, and pregnancy outcomes were ascertained. Women with GDM were older and had a higher pre-pregnancy body mass index than those without GDM. Glycemic control was good in all patients, and there was no difference in delivery outcomes between the two groups. Gestational weight gain was lower in pregnant women with GDM (+8.0 kg) than in those without GDM (+11.8 kg), suggesting the impact of strict nutritional guidance on twin pregnancies with GDM. In conclusion, twin pregnancies with GDM did not have different delivery outcomes compared to those without GDM. To manage twin pregnancies with GDM, this study suggests that it is important to monitor patients' weight and blood glucose levels.

Screening Accuracy of the 50 g-Glucose Challenge Test in Twin Compared With Singleton Pregnancies

CONTEXT

The optimal 50 g-glucose challenge test (GCT) cutoff for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in twin pregnancies is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to explore the screening accuracy of the 50 g-GCT and its correlation with the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) newborn in twin compared to singleton pregnancies. A population-based retrospective cohort study (2007-2017) was conducted in Ontario, Canada. Participants included patients with a singleton (n = 546 892 [98.4%]) or twin (n = 8832 [1.6%]) birth who underwent screening for GDM using the 50 g-GCT.

METHODS

We compared the screening accuracy, risk of GDM, and risk of LGA between twin and singleton pregnancies using various 50 g-GCT cutoffs.

RESULTS

For any given 50 g-GCT result, the probability of GDM was higher (P = .0.007), whereas the probability of LGA was considerably lower in the twin compared with the singleton group, even when a twin-specific growth chart was used to diagnose LGA in the twin group (P < .001). The estimated false-positive rate (FPR) for GDM was higher in twin compared with singleton pregnancies irrespective of the 50 g-GCT cutoff used. The cutoff of 8.2 mmol/L (148 mg/dL) in twin pregnancies was associated with an estimated FPR (10.7%-11.1%) that was similar to the FPR associated with the cutoff of 7.8 mmol/L (140 mg/dL) in singleton pregnancies (10.8%).

CONCLUSION

The screening performance of the 50 g-GCT for GDM and its correlation with LGA differ between twin and singleton pregnancies.

Comparison of “growth promoted” and “normally grown” dichorionic–diamniotic twins: A population-based study

Objectives

Macrosomia in singleton pregnancies and associated risks have been well characterized. Less is known about the outcomes of macrosomic newborns in twin pregnancy.Objective of this study was to compare maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes of "growth promoted twins" (twin pairs with a total twin birth weight above 90th percentile) to "normally grown twins" (twin pairs with a total twin birth weight between 50th and 90th percentile).

Methods

We evaluated data (maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes) of dichorionic–diamniotic twins born at 34 weeks of gestational age or later over a sixteen-year period (2002–2018) in two birth weight groups. We excluded twin pairs born before 34th week of gestation and discordant twin pairs. We used data from the Slovenian National Perinatal Information System.To define the percentiles, twin-specific growth curves have been used.

Results

Our study population consisted of 390 twin pregnancies with a twin total birth weight over 90th percentile and 1618 pregnancies with a total twin birth weight between 50th and 90th percentile for gestational age. Women in "growth promoted" twin group were significantly taller, heavier and more often multiparous. There was a higher incidence of gestational diabetes (10.8% vs 7.3%, OR 1.53 95% CI 1.06 – 2.22), a lower rate of caesarean births (48.2% vs 53.9%, OR 0.80 CI 0.64 – 0.99) and lower rate of assisted reproduction (21.0% vs 27.1%, OR 0.71 CI 0.55 – 0.93) in women in "growth promoted" twin group. There were no statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes in both groups.

Conclusion

In contrast to macrosomia in singletons, macrosomia in twins does not appear to increase the risk for adverse perinatal outcomes.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Second Trimester Plasma Glycated CD59 (pGCD59) to Identify Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on the 75 g OGTT Using the WHO Criteria: A Prospective Study of Non-Diabetic Pregnant Women in Ireland

The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of second trimester plasma glycated CD59 (pGCD59), a novel biomarker, to predict the results of the 2 h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 24−28 weeks of gestation, employing the 2013 World Health Organisation criteria. This was a prospective study of 378 pregnant women. The ability of pGCD59 to predict gestational diabetes (GDM) was assessed using adjusted ROC curves for maternal age, BMI, maternal ethnicity, parity, previous GDM, and family history of diabetes. The pGCD59 levels were significantly higher in women with GDM compared to women with normal glucose tolerance (p = 0.003). The pGCD59 generated an adjusted AUC for identifying GDM cases of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.58−0.71, p < 0.001). The pGCD59 predicted GDM status diagnosed by a fasting glucose value of 5.1 mmol/L with an adjusted AUC of 0.74 (95%CI: 0.65−0.81, p < 0.001). Analysis of BMI subgroups determined that pGCD59 generated the highest AUC in the 35 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 40 kg/m2 (AUC: 0.84 95%CI: 0.69−0.98) and BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 (AUC: 0.96 95%CI: 0.86−0.99) categories. This study found that second trimester pGCD59 is a fair predictor of GDM status diagnosed by elevated fasting glucose independent of BMI and an excellent predictor of GDM in subjects with a very high BMI.

Perinatal Outcomes and Related Risk Factors of Single vs Twin Pregnancy Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-Analysis

Objective

Perinatal outcomes and related risk factors of single vs twin pregnancy complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were clarified, providing evidence for developing preventive measures.

Methods

The Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine (CBM), CQVIP, Wanfang, and PubMed databases were searched for published research on the perinatal outcomes and risk factors of single and twin pregnancy complicated by GDM from 2000 to 2021. The quality of the included literature was evaluated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis of the included literature was conducted using RevMan5.3 software.

Results

Relative to a single pregnancy group, infertility, gestational weight gain, and family history of diabetes presented statistical significance in the twin pregnancy group (P < 0.05); gestational age at delivery, cesarean section, preterm birth < 37 weeks, and preeclampsia presented statistical significance in the twin pregnancy group (P < 0.05); and neonatal birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA), neonatal asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS), neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and neonatal death presented statistical significance in the twin pregnancy group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Infertility, prenatal weight gain, and diabetes in the family are all risk factors for postpartum impaired glucose metabolism in pregnant women with GDM who are carrying twins. The gestational age at delivery, cesarean section, preterm birth < 37 weeks, and preeclampsia of twin pregnant women with diabetes will affect the perinatal status of twin pregnant women. Neonatal birth weight, SGA, neonatal asphyxia, neonatal hypoglycemia, NRDS, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal death, etc. should be paid special attention in the perinatal process.

WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Recognizing that hyperglycemia in pregnancy can impact both individually a patient's health and collectively the healthcare system and that different levels of hyperglycemia incur different consequences, we aimed to evaluate the differences and similarities between patients who met the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) according to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria based on the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

METHODS

This retrospective study included a cohort of 1064 women followed-up at the Gestational Diabetes Unit of Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (Sao Paulo, Brazil). Patients were classified into GDM and DIP groups, according to their OGTT results. Their electronic charts were reviewed to obtain clinical and laboratory data for all participants.

RESULTS

Women in the DIP group had a higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (30.5 vs 28.1 kg/m², odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.11), more frequently experienced GDM in a previous pregnancy (25% vs. 11%, OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.17-6.27), and were more likely to have chronic hypertension (43.1% vs. 23.5%, OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.47-4.11), a current twin pregnancy (10.8% vs. 2.9%, OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.70-9.61), or require insulin (46.1% vs. 14.3%, OR 5.14, 95% CI 3.06-8.65) than those in the GDM group. Patients in the DIP group also had a higher frequency of large-for-gestational-age infants (12.3% vs. 5.1%, OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.23-6.27) and abnormal postpartum OGTT (45.9% vs. 12.6%, OR 5.91, 95% CI 2.93-11.90) than those in the GDM group. Nevertheless, in more than half of the DIP patients, glucose levels returned to normal after birth.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes but does not equate to a diagnosis of diabetes post-pregnancy. It is necessary to identify and monitor these women more closely during and after pregnancy. Keeping patients with hyperglycemia in pregnancy engaged in healthcare is essential for accurate diagnosis and prevention of complications related to abnormal glucose metabolism.

Gestational Diabetes in Twin Versus Singleton Pregnancies With Normal Weight or Overweight Pre-Pregnancy Body Mass Index: The Mediating Role of Mid-Pregnancy Weight Gain

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes might be more common in twin versus singleton pregnancies, yet the reasons for this are unclear. We evaluated the extent to which this relationship is explained by higher mid-pregnancy weight gain within normal weight and overweight pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) strata.

METHODS

We analyzed serial weights and glucose screening and diagnostic data abstracted from medical charts for twin (n = 1397) and singleton (n = 3117) pregnancies with normal or overweight pre-pregnancy BMI delivered from 1998 to 2013 at Magee-Womens Hospital in Pennsylvania. We used causal mediation analyses to estimate the total effect of twin versus singleton pregnancy on gestational diabetes, as well as those mediated (natural indirect effect) and not mediated (natural and controlled direct effects) by pathways involving mid-pregnancy weight gain.

RESULTS

Odds of gestational diabetes were higher among twin pregnancies [odds ratios (ORs) for total effect = 2.83 (95% CI = 1.54, 5.19) for normal weight and 2.09 (95% CI = 1.16, 3.75) for overweight pre pregnancy BMI], yet there was limited evidence that this relationship was mediated by mid-pregnancy weight gain [ORs for natural indirect effect = 1.21 (95% CI = 0.90, 1.24) for normal weight and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.92, 1.21) for overweight pre-pregnancy BMI] and more evidence of mediation via other pathways [ORs for natural direct effect = 2.34 (95% CI = 1.24, 4.40) for normal weight and 1.97 (95% CI = 1.08, 3.60) for overweight pre-pregnancy BMI].

CONCLUSIONS

While twin pregnancies with normal weight or overweight pre-pregnancy BMI experienced higher odds of gestational diabetes versus singletons, most of this effect was explained by pathways not involving mid-pregnancy weight gain.

Early Identification of the Maternal, Placental and Fetal Dialog in Gestational Diabetes and Its Prevention

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) complicates between 5 and 12% of pregnancies, with associated maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications. The ideal screening and diagnostic criteria to diagnose and treat GDM have not been established and, currently, diagnostic use with an oral glucose tolerance test occurs late in pregnancy and produces poor reproducibility. Therefore, in recent years, significant research has been undertaken to identify a first-trimester biomarker that can predict GDM later in pregnancy, enable early intervention, and reduce GDM-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Possible biomarkers include glycemic markers (fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c), adipocyte-derived markers (adiponectin and leptin), pregnancy-related markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and the placental growth factor), inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-α), insulin resistance markers (sex hormone-binding globulin), and others. This review summarizes current data on first-trimester biomarkers, the advantages, and the limitations. Large multi-ethnic clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed not only to build effective prediction models but also to validate their clinical use.

Maternal weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in twin gestations

BACKGROUND

Data on the optimal gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies are limited. As a result, the Institute of Medicine currently provides only provisional recommendations on gestational weight gain in this population.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the optimal range of gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies and to estimate the association between inappropriate gestational weight gain and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all women with twin pregnancies that were followed up in a single, tertiary center between 2000 and 2014. We used 2 approaches to identify the optimal range of gestational weight gain: a statistical approach (the interquartile range of gestational weight gain in low-risk pregnancies with normal outcomes) and an outcome-based approach (by identifying thresholds of gestational weight gain below or above which the rate of adverse outcomes increases). The primary outcome was preterm birth. Associations of gestational weight gain below or above the normal range with the study outcomes were estimated using logistic regression analysis and were expressed as adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. These associations were stratified by prepregnancy body mass index group.

RESULTS

A total of 1274 women with twin pregnancies met the study criteria: 43 were classified as underweight, 777 were normal weight, 278 were overweight, and 176 were obese. Our estimates of the optimal gestational weight gain range were similar to those recommended by the Institute of Medicine except for the obese category, in which our optimal gestational weight gain range at 37 weeks (9.3-16.3 kg) was lower than in the provisional Institute of Medicine recommendations (11.3-19.1 kg). Nearly half of our cohort experienced inappropriate gestational weight gain: 30% (n=381) gained weight below and 17% (n=216) gained weight above current Institute of Medicine recommendations. In the normal weight group, gestational weight gain below recommendations was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth and birthweight at the <10th centile and with a reduction in the risk of hypertensive disorders, whereas gestational weight gain above recommendations was associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders and a reduction in the risk of birthweight at the <10th centile. Associations were less consistent in the overweight and obese groups.

CONCLUSION

These findings identify gestational weight gain as a potentially modifiable risk factor for preterm birth and other pregnancy complications in twin gestations. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether interventions aimed at optimizing gestational weight gain can improve the outcomes of these high-risk pregnancies.

Special Considerations Regarding Antenatal Care and Pregnancy Complications in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies

Twin pregnancies account for about 3.3% of all deliveries in the United States with the majority of them being dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA). Maternal physiological adaption in twin pregnancies is exaggerated and the rate of almost every maternal and fetal complication is higher when compared to singleton pregnancies. Therefore, twin pregnancies necessitate closer antenatal surveillance by care providers who are familiar with the specific challenges unique to these pregnancies, and there is evidence that following women with twins in a specialized twin clinic can result in improved obstetrical outcomes. The importance of the first antenatal visit in twin pregnancies cannot be over emphasized and should preferably take place early in gestation as it is the optimal period to correctly identify the number of fetuses and the type of placentation (chorionicity and amnionicity). This will allow the patients, families, and caregivers to make the appropriate modifications and to tailor an optimal antenatal follow-up plan. This plan should focus on general recommendations such as weight gain and level of activity, education regarding complications specific to twin pregnancies along with the relevant symptoms and indications to seek care, as well as on close maternal and fetal monitoring. In this review, we summarize available evidence and current guidelines regarding antenatal care in DCDA twin pregnancies.

Gestational diabetes and fetal growth in twin compared with singleton pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with accelerated fetal growth in singleton pregnancies but may affect twin pregnancies differently because of the slower growth of twin fetuses during the third trimester of pregnancy and their greater predisposition to fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association of gestational diabetes mellitus with longitudinal fetal growth in twin pregnancies and to compare this association with that observed in singleton pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton or twin pregnancy who were followed up at a single tertiary referral center between January 2011 and April 2020. Data on estimated fetal weight and individual fetal biometric indices were extracted from ultrasound examinations of eligible women. Generalized linear models were used to model and compare the change in fetal weight and individual biometric indices as a function of gestational age between women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies and between women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus in singleton pregnancies. The primary outcome was estimated fetal weight as a function of gestational age. The secondary outcomes were longitudinal growth of individual fetal biometric indices and the rate of small for gestational age and large for gestational age at birth.

RESULTS

A total of 26,651 women (94,437 ultrasound examinations) were included in the analysis: 1881 with a twin pregnancy and 24,770 with a singleton pregnancy. The rate of gestational diabetes mellitus in the twin and singleton groups was 9.6% (n=180) and 7.6% (n=1893), respectively. The estimated fetal weight in singleton pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus was significantly higher than that in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus (P<.001) starting at approximately 30 weeks of gestation. The differences remained similar after adjusting for maternal age, chronic hypertension, nulliparity, and neonatal sex (P<.001). In twin pregnancies, fetal growth was similar between pregnancies with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (P=.105 and P=.483 for unadjusted and adjusted models, respectively). The findings were similar to the association of gestational diabetes mellitus with the risk of large for gestational fetuses and the growth of each biometric index. When stratified by type of gestational diabetes mellitus treatment, twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with accelerated fetal growth only in the subgroup of women with medically treated gestational diabetes mellitus (P<.001), which represented 12% (n=21) of the twin pregnancy group with gestational diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to singleton pregnancies, twin pregnancies with gestational diabetes mellitus is less likely to be associated with accelerated fetal growth. This finding has raised the question of whether the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus and the blood glucose targets in women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus should be individualized for twin pregnancies.

Association between pregravid liver enzyme levels and gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis of national cohort study

Multiple pregnancies are prone to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study investigated the association between pregravid liver enzyme levels and the development of GDM in a twin pregnancy. Women who had the National Health Screening Examination and delivered their twin babies within one year were enrolled. Pregravid liver enzyme levels were divided into high and low level. Risks for developing GDM by high levels of liver enzymes were analyzed, in subgroups by pregravid obesity or metabolic syndrome. Among the 4348 twin pregnancies, 369 women (8.5%) developed GDM not requiring insulin treatment (GDM - IT), and 119 women (2.7%) developed GDM requiring insulin treatment(GDM + IT). High levels of pregravid GGT and ALT were related to risks of GDM + IT not only in women with obesity or metabolic syndrome (odds ratio[OR] 6.348, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.579-15.624 and OR 6.879, 95% CI 2.232-21.204, respectively), but also in women without obesity (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.565-5.946) or without metabolic syndrome (OR 3.338, 95% CI 1.86-5.992), compared to in women with low levels of those. However, there were no significant associations in the pregravid ALT and GGT levels and risks for development of GDM - IT, unrelated to pregravid obesity or metabolic syndrome. Therefore, this study suggests that women with high levels of pregravid GGT and ALT need to recognize their increased risk of GDM + IT, regardless of pregravid obesity or MetS, when they get pregnant twin.

Changes in serum total bile acid concentrations are associated with the risk of developing adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant Chinese women

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed to investigate the association between total bile acid (TBA) concentrations changes during the second and third trimesters and the risk of developing adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes (AMPO).

METHODS

A total of 1569 pregnant Chinese women were enrolled. Serum TBA concentrations were measured during the 16-18^th and 29-34^th weeks of gestation. Logistic regression models were performed.

RESULTS

After multivariable adjustment, each standard deviation increase in the TBA concentrations in the second trimester was associated with a 30% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13, 1.50) increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and a 22% (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.63) increased risk of premature rupture of membranes (PROM). When we compared the highest and lowest quartiles of changes in the TBA Z-scores across the second and third trimesters, the adjusted ORs were 1.84 (95% CI: 1.28, 2.65) for PROM and 1.47 (95% CI: 1.07, 2.28) for macrosomia.

CONCLUSION

Elevated serum TBA concentrations during pregnancy were positively associated with increased risks of GDM and PROM. Women with more drastic changes in TBA concentrations across the second and third trimesters were at a higher risk of developing PROM and macrosomia.

First-Trimester Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Twin Pregnancies

We previously reported a logistic regression model for prediction of GDM from maternal characteristics and medical history in 75,161 singleton pregnancies. In this study of 1376 twin and 13,760 singleton pregnancies recruited at 11-13 weeks' gestation, we extend the model to include terms for twin pregnancies. We found the respective odds of GDM in dichorionic and monochorionic twin pregnancies to be 1.36 (95% CI: 1.02-1.81) and 2.78 (95% CI: 1.72-4.48) times higher than in singleton pregnancies. In both singleton and twin pregnancies, the risk for GDM increased with maternal age and weight and birth weight z-score of a baby in a previous pregnancy and is higher in women with a previous pregnancy complicated by GDM; in those with a first- or second-degree relative with diabetes mellitus; in women of Black, East Asian, and South Asian racial origin; and in pregnancies conceived through the use of ovulation-induction drugs. In singleton pregnancies, at 10% and 20% false-positive rate, the detection rate was 43% and 58%, respectively. In twin pregnancies, using risk cut-offs corresponding to 10% and 20% false-positive rates in singletons, the respective false-positive rates were 27% and 47%, and the detection rates were 63% and 81%.

The screening performance of glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The screening accuracy of the 50 g-glucose challenge test (50 g-GCT) for gestational diabetes (GDM) has been described in singleton pregnancies. Given the physiologic differences and greater increase in insulin resistance in twin compared with singleton pregnancies, the performance of the 50 g-GCT in twin pregnancies may differ.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review on the screening performance of the 50 g-GCT for gestational diabetes in twin pregnancies.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

We included randomized controlled trials or cohort studies that evaluated the screening accuracy of the 50 g-GCT for GDM in twin pregnancies using the two-step approach. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value of the 50 g-GCT for GDM using the 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) threshold.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The positive predictive value (PPV) was pooled for studies that used similar test characteristics.

RESULTS

From 2044 citations, 7 retrospective cohort studies with a total of 55,597 participants were included (6.5% twins and 93.5% singletons). The majority of studies evaluated a 50-g GCT cutoff point of 140 mg/dL. The pooled PPV for a threshold of 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) for twins was 22.58% (95% CI: 0.1912-0.2647, I²=34.1%). The 50-g GCT screen positive rate in twin pregnancies was higher than that in singleton pregnancies. None of the studies performed routine OGTT.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

The PPV of 50 g-GCT for GDM in twin pregnancies when using a threshold of 140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/L) is approximately 23%. There is currently no data on the sensitivity and specificity of the 50 g-GCT in twins.

Risk factors and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes for women with dichorionic twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cross-sectional study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

The association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies remains unclear. This study was undertaken to highlight risk factors for GDM in women with dichorionic (DC) twins, and to determine the association between GDM DC twins and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in a large homogeneous Taiwanese population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out on 645 women with DC twins, excluding pregnancies complicated by one or both fetuses with demise (n = 22) or congenital anomalies (n = 9), who gave birth after 28 complete gestational weeks between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2018. Univariable and multiple logistic regression analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Maternal age >34 years (adjusted odds ratio 2.52; 95% confidence interval 1.25-5.07) and pre-pregnancy body mass index >24.9 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio 2.83, 95% confidence interval 1.47-5.46) were independent risk factors for GDM in women with DC twins. Newborns from women with GDM DC twins were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted odds ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.72) than newborns from women with non-GDM DC twins. Other pregnancy and neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced maternal age and pre-pregnancy overweight or obesity are risk factors for GDM in women with DC twins. Except for a nearly twofold increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission of newborns, the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes for women with GDM DC twins are similar to those for women with non-GDM DC twins.

Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm Vertex/nonVertex twins

BACKGROUND

One of the controversies in the management of twin gestations relates to mode of delivery, especially when the second twin is in a nonvertex presentation (Vertex/nonVertex pairs) and birth is imminent at extremely low gestation.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that, for Vertex/nonVertex twins born before 28 weeks' gestation, cesarean delivery would be associated with a lower risk of adverse neonatal outcomes than trial of vaginal delivery. Our aim was to test this hypothesis by comparing the neonatal outcomes of Vertex/nonVertex twins born before 28 weeks' gestation by mode of delivery using a large national cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

This work is a retrospective cohort study of all twin infants born at 24^0/7 to 27^6/7 weeks' gestation and admitted to level III neonatal intensive care units participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network (2010-2017). Exposure is defined a trial of vaginal delivery for Vertex/nonVertex twins. Nonexposed (control) groups are defined as cases where both twins were delivered by cesarean delivery, either in vertex or nonvertex presentation (control group 1) or owing to the nonvertex presentation of the first twin (control group 2). Outcome measures are defined as a composite of neonatal death, severe neurologic injury, or birth trauma.

RESULTS

A total of 1082 twin infants (541 twin pairs) met the inclusion criteria: 220 Vertex/nonVertex pairs, of which 112 had a trial of vaginal delivery (study group) and 108 had cesarean delivery for both twins (control group 1); 170 pairs with the first twin in nonvertex presentation, all of which were born by cesarean delivery (control group 2); and 151 pairs with both twins in vertex presentation (vertex or nonvertex). In the study group, the rate of urgent cesarean delivery for the second twin was 30%. The rate of the primary outcome in the study group was 42%, which was not significantly different compared with control group 1 (37%; adjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.22) or control group 2 (34%; adjusted relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.58). The findings remained similar when outcomes were analyzed separately for the first and second twins.

CONCLUSION

For preterm Vertex/nonVertex twins born at <28 weeks' gestation, we found no difference in the risk of adverse neonatal outcome between a trial of vaginal delivery and primary cesarean delivery. However, a trial of vaginal delivery was associated with a high rate of urgent cesarean delivery for the second twin.

DEVELOPING twin-specific 75-g oral glucose tolerance test diagnostic thresholds for gestational diabetes based on the risk of future maternal diabetes: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To develop twin-specific outcome-based oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) diagnostic thresholds for GDM based on the risk of future maternal type-2 diabetes.

DESIGN

A population-based retrospective cohort study (2007-2017).

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

Nulliparous women with a live singleton (n = 55 361) or twin (n = 1308) birth who underwent testing for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) using a 75-g OGTT in Ontario, Canada (2007-2017). We identified the 75-g OGTT thresholds in twin pregnancies that were associated with similar incidence rates of future type-2 diabetes to those associated with the standard OGTT thresholds in singleton pregnancies.

RESULTS

For any given 75-g OGTT value, the incidence rate of future maternal type-2 diabetes was lower for women with a twin than women with a singleton pregnancy. Using women with a negative OGTT as reference, the risk of future maternal type-2 diabetes in twin pregnancies with a positive OGTT based on the standard OGTT thresholds (9.86 per 1000 person years, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.79, 95% CI 2.69-8.51) was lower than for singleton pregnancies with a positive OGTT (18.74 per 1000 person years, aHR 8.22, 95% CI 7.38-9.16). The twin-specific OGTT fasting, 1-hour and 2-hour thresholds identified in the current study based on correlation with future maternal type-2 diabetes were 5.8 mmol/l (104 mg/dl), 11.8 mmol/l (213 mg/dl) and 10.4 mmol/l (187 mg/dl), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified potential twin-specific OGTT thresholds for GDM that are associated with a similar risk of future type-2 diabetes to that observed in women diagnosed with GDM in singleton pregnancies based on standard OGTT thresholds.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Potential twin-specific OGTT thresholds for GDM were identified.

Uterocervical angle at 20 weeks: A promising predictor of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of uterocervical angle (UCA) and cervical length (CL) measurement at 20 weeks of pregnancy for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in twin pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 424 twin pregnancies who delivered in our center from October 2014 to December 2018 and who underwent transvaginal ultrasound between 19⁺⁰-22⁺⁰ weeks to measure CL during routine second trimester scan. Recorded ultrasound images of CL were reassessed to evaluate UCA. Medical and obstetric data were also collected for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 424 women were included. The rates of sPTB rate below 28, 32 and 34 weeks of gestation were 2.8 %, 5.4 % and 10.4 %, respectively. ROC curves showed a better area under the curve (AUC) for UCA at all gestational ages compared with CL (AUC for sPTB <28 weeks 0.902 (p < 0.001) vs 0.620 (p 0.175); AUC for sPTB <32 weeks 0.740 (p 0.001) vs 0.620 (p 0.058); AUC for sPTB <34 weeks 0.676 (p 0.001) vs 0.632 (p 0.047). UCA > 120 degrees was significantly associated with sPTB <28 weeks (p < 0.001; OR 39.17; CI 4.81-319.23; NPV, 99.65 %), <32 weeks (OR 4.23; p 0.002) and <34 weeks of gestation (OR 2.66; p 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In our study, an UCA > 120 degrees allowed to identify those women with twin pregnancies at risk of sPTB and performed better than CL measurement.

Risk factors associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: The role of pregnancy-induced hypertension and physical inactivity

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) causes serious complications affecting the mother and fetus. Physical activity (PA) during pregnancy has positive effects on the mother and fetus. The objectives of this study were to assess GMD prevalence in Kuwait, identify its risk factors, and to evaluate its association with PA.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among a randomly selected 653 post-partum women from all public maternal centers and five private centers. An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used to collect participants' socio-demographic data, medical and obstetric history. Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) was used to assess PA level.

RESULTS

Participants' mean age was 30.1 ± 5.3. GMD was diagnosed among 14.1% (95% CI: 11.6-17.0) of participants. Binary logistic regression revealed that poor income, having 2 + chronic diseases, past history of GDM, hypothyroidism, high systolic or diastolic blood pressure during pregnancy were independently correlated with developing GDM. For physical activity, the overall means of PPAQ total and sub-scores were below average and only PPAQ sub-score -Vigorous Intensity Activity- was significantly higher amid women without GMD than those with. However, PPAQ mean scores showed significant positive correlation with women's pre-pregnancy BMI and birth weight; and a significant negative association with gestational systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

GDM prevalence is relatively high in Kuwait, notably amid expatriates. Pregnancy-induced hypertension along with social and pre-pregnancy medical conditions correlated with developing GDM. PA helped mitigated pregnancy blood pressure, and fetal birth weight. Promoting additional medical monitoring and PA during pregnancy might aid reduce the prevalence of GDM.

The Association between Glucose Levels and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Nondiabetic Twin Pregnancies

Objective  The aim of this study is to determine if hyperglycemia in twin pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design  Retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies in a single Maternal-Fetal Medicine practice between 2005 and 2019 who underwent two-step GDM screening at 24 to 28 weeks. We excluded women with pregestational or gestational diabetes. We examined the association between maternal glycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Glycemia was defined as the 1-hour GCT in all women, and each of the four values of the 3-hour OGTT in women who failed the GCT (≥130 mg/dL). Primary outcomes were preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and neonatal hypoglycemia in either twin. Statistical tests used included Pearson's correlation, Student's t -test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test for trend, and logistic regression. Results  A total of 847 women underwent a GCT and 246 women underwent an OGTT. Increasing maternal glucose levels had no positive association with adverse outcomes. Women with preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, and neonatal hypoglycemia did not have higher mean GCT or OGTT values than women without these outcomes. There was no increased risk of adverse outcomes with increasing quartiles of the GCT or OGTT values. Conclusion  In women with twin pregnancies without GDM, elevated maternal glucose levels are not associated with preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, or neonatal hypoglycemia. The altered physiology of twin gestations may modify the effect of maternal hyperglycemia on perinatal outcomes as compared with singleton pregnancies. Current approaches to screening for and treating GDM during pregnancy might not adequately account for these unique considerations among twins.

Maternal dietary patterns and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies: a longitudinal twin pregnancies birth cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is correlated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes for both the mother and offspring. Previous research has reported correlations between maternal dietary patterns and GDM, but such evidence for twin pregnancies is lacking. This study aimed to identify maternal dietary patterns in the second trimester and investigate their relationships with the risk of GDM among women who were pregnant with twins in China.

METHODS

A longitudinal twin pregnancies birth cohort study of women who were pregnant with twins in China was conducted. Maternal dietary intake in the second trimester was recorded by using a food frequency questionnaire prior to the diagnosis of GDM among participants from the prospective twin pregnancies birth cohort in Chongqing City. GDM was diagnosed with a 75 g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 23-26 weeks of gestation. Dietary patterns were identified by principal components analysis, and the correlations between dietary pattern and GDM were examined using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 324 participants, 101 (31.2%) were diagnosed with GDM. Four dietary patterns were identified: a vegetable-based pattern, a poultry-and-fruit-based pattern, a sweet-based pattern and a plant-protein-based pattern. Multivariate analysis showed that none of the dietary patterns were correlated with the risk of GDM among women who were pregnant with twins, but the sweet-based dietary pattern, which was associated with a higher GDM risk for quartile 4 versus quartile 1 (OR 2.69; 95% CI: 1.09, 6.66) among non-overweight women (prepregnancy BMI < 24.0).

CONCLUSION

Dietary patterns were not correlated with later GDM risk among women who were pregnant with twins in western China, whereas a high intake of sweets was associated with a higher risk for GDM among women who were not overweight prior to pregnancy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-OOC-16008203. Retrospectively registered on 1 April 2016.

Association of Serum Uric Acid, Urea Nitrogen, and Urine Specific Gravity Levels at 16-18 Weeks of Gestation with the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associations of serum uric acid (UA), urea nitrogen (UN), and urine specific gravity (USG) levels in the first trimester of pregnancy with the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 1,769 pregnant women aged 31.55 ± 3.91 years. UA, UN, and USG levels were measured during the 16-18th week of gestation. GDM was diagnosed by an oral 75 g glucose tolerance test during the 24-28th week of gestation.

RESULTS

A multivariate adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that UA levels in the highest quartile increased the risk of GDM by 55.7% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.557, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.055-2.298; p = 0.026) compared to those in the lowest quartile. USG levels in the second, third, and fourth quartiles increased the risk of GDM by 67.6% (95% CI: 1.090-2.421), 112.4% (95% CI: 1.446-3.119), and 94.5% (95% CI: 1.314-2.880), respectively, compared to those in the first quartile (p trend = 0.001). No significant association between UN levels and the GDM risk was observed. When the extreme composite biomarker score quartiles were compared, the adjusted OR (95% CI) for GDM was 1.909 (95% CI: 1.332-2.736). Age-stratified analyses revealed similar results in women aged ≤35 years only, but not in those aged >35 years.

CONCLUSION

Higher levels of UA and USG and a higher composite kidney function biomarker score during the 16-18th week of gestation were positively and independently associated with an increased risk of GDM.