1
|
Di Spiezio Sardo A, Becker CM, Renner SP, Suvitie PA, Tarriel JE, Vannuccini S, Garcia Velasco JA, Verguts J, Mercorio A. Management of women with endometriosis in the 21st century. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2025; 37:149-157. [PMID: 40237624 PMCID: PMC12039902 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000001027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly affects women's quality of life and fertility. Despite advancements in treatment, many areas of uncertainty persist in clinical management. This review provides a symptom-focused, patient-centered update, addressing cases from asymptomatic to those complicated by pain and infertility. RECENT FINDINGS Advancement in imaging technology has increased incidental diagnoses of asymptomatic endometriosis, raising the debate between immediate treatment and watchful waiting. Medical therapy primarily aims to suppress symptoms, with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and add-back therapy offering promising long-term pain control. Research into local neurogenesis and central sensitization supports complementary approaches, though high-quality evidence is still limited. For pain refractory to medical therapy, conservative surgical strategies can minimize postoperative complications without significantly increasing recurrence rates. In infertility, assisted reproductive technology (ART) provides effective options, although the optimal endometrial preparation and the necessity of pre-ART surgery remain to be fully elucidated. SUMMARY The optimal management of endometriosis requires a personalized, multidisciplinary approach within specialized centers. Long-term suppressive medical therapy remains the cornerstone of pain management while emerging targeted agents hold promise for better symptom control with fewer side effects. Surgical intervention should be performed by experienced surgeons as a single definitive procedure when possible. Tailored ART protocols can address infertility challenges. Standardized classification systems and robust randomized trials are crucial to refining treatment pathways, optimizing fertility outcomes, and enhancing quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Christian M. Becker
- Endometriosis CaRe Centre, Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan P. Renner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Böblingen, Klinikverbund-Suedwest, Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen, Böblingen, Germany
| | - Pia A. Suvitie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Josep Estadella Tarriel
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Preventive Medicine and Public Health Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Vannuccini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences ‘Mario Serio’, University of Florence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Juan A Garcia Velasco
- IVIRMA Global Research Alliance, IVI RMA Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia,Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jasper Verguts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessa Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Antonio Mercorio
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Foch, Suresnes and University Versailles, Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
La Marca A, Semprini M, Mastellari E, Donno V, Capuzzo M, Alboni C, Giulini S. Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2025; 2025:hoaf012. [PMID: 40123895 PMCID: PMC11930344 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaf012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Revised: 12/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometriosis is a chronic disease that can compromise fertility in up to 30-50% of affected patients, and it is estimated that patients affected by endometriosis represent about 10% of patients undergoing ART treatments. The hypothesized underlying mechanisms explaining infertility are various, but great attention has been given to the relationship between ovarian endometriomas and reduced ovarian reserve. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE Infertility in patients with endometriosis does not have univocal management, since surgical therapy can increase the chances of natural conception, but at the same time increases the risk of damage to the ovarian reserve. In some cases, IVF procedures should be considered instead of surgery, within a personalized strategy. It has therefore been proposed that patients with endometriosis are eligible for fertility preservation. SEARCH METHODS This article is based on a critical review of literature on peer-reviewed article indexing databases including PubMed, Scopus and Medline, using as keywords: 'fertility preservation', 'oocyte vitrification', 'endometriosis', 'endometrioma', 'ovarian reserve' and 'in vitro fertilization'. OUTCOMES Data regarding the feasibility of oocyte cryopreservation in patients with endometriosis have increased over recent years, indicating that these patients seem to have the same number of oocytes retrieved and IVF outcomes similar to those who perform fertility preservation for other indications. However, probably due to a reduced ovarian reserve, several cycles of ovarian stimulation may be needed to gather a suitable number of retrieved oocytes per patient. Age, ovarian reserve, and previous ovarian surgery are the main factors affecting the success of fertility preservation. Bilateral endometriomas, a history of unilateral endometrioma surgery with a contralateral recurrence, and preoperative reduced ovarian reserve are the most common indications for fertility preservation. The choice between primary surgery and ART is often complex, requiring a therapeutic strategy tailored to the patient's clinical characteristics and needs, such as age, type and severity of endometriosis lesions, presence of symptoms, surgical history, and desire for pregnancy. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The development of endometriosis-related infertility and the severity of ovarian damage due to endometriosis lesions per se or their surgical treatment are difficult to predict, and data are lacking concerning which subgroups of patients with endometriosis might benefit most from fertility preservation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS Women with endometriosis, and in particular women with bilateral ovarian endometriomas or recurrent surgery on the ovaries, should be advised about risk of ovarian reserve damage. Oocyte cryopreservation is an established technique that has been demonstrated as feasible and successful for these patients; however, the specific indications have not yet been established. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS There are no funding sources for the study and no conflicts of interest to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio La Marca
- Correspondence address. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124 Modena, Italy. E-mail: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7921-9547
| | - Michela Semprini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Elisa Mastellari
- UO Tutela Salute Famiglia, Donna ed Età evolutiva, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy
| | - Valeria Donno
- Dexeus Fertility, Department of Obstetric Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Martina Capuzzo
- Tethys—Assisted Reproductive Technologies Center, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Alboni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Simone Giulini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vallée A, Saridogan E, Petraglia F, Keckstein J, Polyzos N, Wyns C, Gianaroli L, Tarlatzis B, Ayoubi JM, Feki A. Horizons in Endometriosis: Proceedings of the Montreux Reproductive Summit, 14-15 July 2023. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2024; 16:1-32. [PMID: 38603778 PMCID: PMC11317919 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.16.s1.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis is a complex and chronic gynaecological disorder that affects millions of women worldwide, leading to significant morbidity and impacting reproductive health. This condition affects up to 10% of women of reproductive age and is characterised by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, potentially leading to symptoms such as chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and infertility. The Montreux summit brought a number of experts in this field together to provide a platform for discussion and exchange of ideas. These proceedings summarise the six main topics that were discussed at this summit to shed light on future directions of endometriosis classification, diagnosis, and therapeutical management. The first question addressed the possibility of preventing endometriosis in the future by identifying risk factors, genetic predispositions, and further understanding of the pathophysiology of the condition to develop targeted interventions. The clinical presentation of endometriosis is varied, and the correlation between symptoms severity and disease extent is unclear. While there is currently no universally accepted optimal classification system for endometriosis, several attempts striving towards its optimisation - each with its own advantages and limitations - were discussed. The ideal classification should be able to reconcile disease status based on the various diagnostic tools, and prognosis to guide proper patient tailored management. Regarding diagnosis, we focused on future tools and critically discussed emerging approaches aimed at reducing diagnostic delay. Preserving fertility in endometriosis patients was another debatable aspect of management that was reviewed. Moreover, besides current treatment modalities, potential novel medical therapies that can target underlying mechanisms, provide effective symptom relief, and minimise side effects in endometriotic patients were considered, including hormonal therapies, immunomodulation, and regenerative medicine. Finally, the question of hormonal substitution therapy after radical treatment for endometriosis was debated, weighing the benefits of hormone replacement.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ruan X, Xu C, Huang H, Xu B, Du J, Cheng J, Jin F, Gu M, Kong W, Yin C, Wu Y, Tian Q, Cao Y, Wu R, Xu L, Jin J, Li Y, Dai Y, Ju R, Ma F, Wang G, Wei W, Huang X, Qin M, Lin Y, Sun Y, Liu R, Zhang W, Li X, Zou L, Hao M, Ye X, Wang F, Wang Y, Hu Z, Huang Y, Zhu T, Yang C, Wang J, Yang X, Ni R, Wang L, Luo G, Min A, Zhang S, Li P, Cheng L, Li L, Jin Q, Shi D, Li Y, Ren F, Cheng Y, Niu J, Tian Y, Mueck AO. Practice guideline on ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in the prevention and treatment of iatrogenic premature ovarian insufficiency. Maturitas 2024; 182:107922. [PMID: 38325136 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) refers to the decline of ovarian function before the age of 40. POI causes a reduction in or loss of female fertility, accompanied by different degrees of menopausal symptoms, which increases the risk of chronic diseases related to early menopause and seriously affects patients' quality of life and health. It is conservatively estimated that at least one million prepubertal girls and women of reproductive age in China are at risk of iatrogenic POI caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy every year. With the development of medical technology and the breakthrough of scientific and technological advances, preventing and treating iatrogenic POI have become possible. International and national guidelines consider cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation to be the most promising method of preserving the ovarian function and fertility of prepubertal girls and women of reproductive age who cannot delay radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In order to guide the clinical application of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation technology in China, the Guideline Working Group finally included 14 scientific questions and 18 recommendations through a questionnaire survey, field investigation, and consultation of a large number of Chinese and English literature databases in order to provide a reference for colleagues in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyan Ruan
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China; Department for Women's Health, University Women's Hospital and Research Center for Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Che Xu
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China; Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hefeng Huang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics, Shool of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Juan Du
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaojiao Cheng
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fengyu Jin
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Muqing Gu
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Weimin Kong
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chenghong Yin
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yurui Wu
- Children's Hospital, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China
| | - Qinjie Tian
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College/Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yunxia Cao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Ruifang Wu
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Liangzhi Xu
- West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanglu Li
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yinmei Dai
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Ju
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Ma
- National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Wang
- Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Maoquan Qin
- National Center for Children's Health, Hematology Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Lin
- Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China
| | - Yuan Sun
- Beijing Jingdu Children's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Children's Hospital, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaodong Li
- The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China
| | - Lin Zou
- Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Guangdong, China
| | - Min Hao
- Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
| | - Xiyang Ye
- Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China
| | - Fuling Wang
- The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yue Wang
- Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhuoying Hu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yanhong Huang
- Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Tianyuan Zhu
- Gansu Provincial Maternal and Child-care Hospital/Gansu Province Central Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Caihong Yang
- The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China
| | - Jinping Wang
- Zibo Maternal And Child Health Hospital, Zibo, China
| | - Xiaomin Yang
- Liuzhou Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Rong Ni
- The Central Hospital of Enshi Tu Jia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China
| | - Liqun Wang
- Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiangxi, China
| | - Guangxia Luo
- The First People's Hospital of Huaihua (Hunan University of Medicine General Hospital), Huaihua, China
| | - Aiping Min
- People's Hospital of Leshan City, Leshan, China
| | - Siyou Zhang
- The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China
| | - Peiling Li
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Linghui Cheng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China
| | - Lianfang Li
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Huairou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Huairou, China
| | - Quanfang Jin
- Shanghai Baoshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongmei Shi
- Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Yinchuan, Yinchuan, China
| | - Yan Li
- Luoyang Anhe Hospital, Luoyang, China
| | | | | | - Jumin Niu
- Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Ying Tian
- XiangXi Ninger Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Xiangxi, China
| | - Alfred O Mueck
- Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China; Department for Women's Health, University Women's Hospital and Research Center for Women's Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elizur SE, Aizer A, Yonish M, Shavit T, Orvieto R, Mashiach R, Cohen SB, Berkowitz E. Fertility preservation for women with ovarian endometriosis: results from a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 46:332-337. [PMID: 36564221 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What is the outcome of fertility-preservation treatments in women with endometrioma, especially those with endometrioma larger than 4 cm? DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. Women with definitive diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis (by histology or ultrasound), who underwent fertility-preservation treatment in two IVF units between 2016 and 2021, were included. As some women cryopreserved oocytes and other embryos, the primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved. RESULTS Seventy-one women with ovarian endometriosis (OMA) underwent 138 fertility-preservation cycles. The median age of patients was 31 years. Forty out of 71 (56%) women underwent at least one surgery for OMA before fertility-preservation treatment. Multivariate analysis of each patient's first cycle was used. Women who underwent OMA surgery before fertility-preservation treatment had a 51.7% reduction (95% CI 26.1 to 68.5, P = 0.001) in the number of MII oocytes compared with women with OMA who did not undergo surgery. Among a subgroup who did not undergo surgery, those with an endometrioma larger than 4 cm had similar anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (2.6 ng/ml versus 2.1 ng/ml), number of oocytes retrieved (9 versus 9) and number of MII oocytes (7.6 versus seven 7) compared with women with an endometrioma of 4 cm or less. CONCLUSIONS Discussing fertility-preservation treatment options with patients with OMA is recommended, especially if surgery is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shai E Elizur
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; Assuta Tel-Aviv Hospital, Israel.
| | - Adva Aizer
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | | | | | - Raoul Orvieto
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Roy Mashiach
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Shlomo B Cohen
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Elad Berkowitz
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| |
Collapse
|