1
|
Current Insights and Progress in the Clinical Management of Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246079. [PMID: 36551565 PMCID: PMC9776832 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC), also known as the cancer that can affect the structures between the dura mater and the pleura, is the 6th most common type of cancer. This heterogeneous group of malignancies is usually treated with a combination of surgery and radio- and chemotherapy, depending on if the disease is localized or at an advanced stage. However, most HNC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, resulting in the death of half of these patients. Thus, the prognosis of advanced or recurrent/metastatic HNC, especially HNC squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), is notably poorer than the prognosis of patients diagnosed with localized HNC. This review explores the epidemiology and etiologic factors of HNC, the histopathology of this heterogeneous cancer, and the diagnosis methods and treatment approaches currently available. Moreover, special interest is given to the novel therapies used to treat HNC subtypes with worse prognosis, exploring immunotherapies and targeted/multi-targeted drugs undergoing clinical trials, as well as light-based therapies (i.e., photodynamic and photothermal therapies).
Collapse
|
2
|
Colombo E, Van Lierde C, Zlate A, Jensen A, Gatta G, Didonè F, Licitra LF, Grégoire V, Vander Poorten V, Locati LD. Salivary gland cancers in elderly patients: challenges and therapeutic strategies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1032471. [PMID: 36505842 PMCID: PMC9733538 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1032471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are the most heterogeneous subgroup of head and neck malignant tumors, accounting for more than 20 subtypes. The median age of SGC diagnosis is expected to rise in the following decades, leading to crucial clinical challenges in geriatric oncology. Elderly patients, in comparison with patients aged below 65 years, are generally considered less amenable to receiving state-of-the-art curative treatments for localized disease, such as surgery and radiation/particle therapy. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy regimens are often dampened by the consideration of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Nevertheless, the elderly population encompasses a broad spectrum of functionalities. In the last decades, some screening tools (e.g. the G8 questionnaire) have been developed to identify those subjects who should receive a multidimensional geriatric assessment, to answer the question about the feasibility of complex treatments. In the present article, we discuss the most frequent SGC histologies diagnosed in the elderly population and the relative 5-years survival outcomes based on the most recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Moreover, we review the therapeutic strategies currently available for locoregionally advanced and metastatic disease, taking into account the recent advances in precision oncology. The synergy between the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and the Geriatrician aims to shape the most appropriate treatment pathway for each elderly patient, focusing on global functionality instead of the sole chronological age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Colombo
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Charlotte Van Lierde
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Zlate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Alexandra Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Giessen and Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Gemma Gatta
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Didonè
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa F. Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Vander Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laura D. Locati
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akbaba S, Rühle A, Rothhaar S, Zamboglou C, Gkika E, Foerster R, Oebel L, Klodt T, Schmidberger H, Grosu AL, Debus J, Bostel T, Nicolay NH. Treatment outcomes of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy - Results from a large multicenter analysis. Radiother Oncol 2020; 156:266-274. [PMID: 33359662 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate oncological outcomes and treatment-related toxicities of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Local/locoregional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of elderly patients ≥ 65 years with primary salivary gland cancers undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy between 2005 and 2020 at three tertiary cancer centers were calculated. The impact of clinicopathological and treatment parameters on outcomes were analyzed, and acute and chronic toxicities were quantified. RESULTS 288 elderly salivary gland cancer patients were included in this multicenter analysis, and their median LRC, PFS and OS amounted to 113, 39 and 75 months, respectively. Age, performance status, comorbidities, definitive vs. adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy as well as locally/locoregionally advanced cancers and distant metastases correlated with reduced outcomes in elderly salivary gland patients. Patients receiving dose-escalated radiotherapy (total doses > 70 GyEQD2) with carbon ion boost radiation resulted in improved LRC, but no improvements in PFS or OS. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy did not improve treatment outcomes in elderly salivary gland carcinoma patients. Radiotherapy of elderly salivary gland cancer patients resulted in moderate higher-grade toxicities despite dose escalation with 70 (24.3%) and 48 patients (16.7%) experiencing acute and chronic grade 3 toxicities, respectively. No grade 4/5 toxicities were observed in this patient cohort. CONCLUSION Data from the largest multicenter analysis of elderly salivary gland cancer patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy demonstrate favorable LRC and tolerable toxicity rates. Decision-making for these vulnerable patients should be based on patient performance rather than chronological patient age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sati Akbaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sofie Rothhaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Foerster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Laura Oebel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tristan Klodt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salivary gland carcinoma in Denmark: a national update and follow-up on incidence, histology, and outcome. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:1179-1188. [PMID: 32691231 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06205-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Salivary gland carcinoma is a rare disease and studies on epidemiology and outcome require data collection over many years. The aim of this study is to present an update of incidence rates, anatomical sites, histological subtypes, and survival rates based on the Danish national cohort of salivary gland carcinoma patients. METHODS Data from all Danish patients with salivary gland carcinoma diagnosed from 1990 to 2015 (n = 1601) were included and analyzed following histological reevaluation and reclassification. Overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival were evaluated. Prognostic factors were analyzed with multivariate Cox Hazard Regression. RESULTS The study population consisted of 769 men and 832 women, median age 62 years (range 6-102). The most frequent anatomic site was the parotid gland (51.8%). Adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common subtype (24.7%). The majority had tumor classification T1/T2 (65.3%). The mean crude incidence was 1.2/100.000/year with an increase of 1.5% per year. There was no increase in age-adjusted incidence. The 5-, 10-, and 20-year survival rates were for overall survival 68, 52, and 35%, for disease-specific survival, 77, 69, and 64%, and for recurrence-free survival, 75, 64, and 51%, respectively. Age, high-grade histological subtype, advanced T-classification, cervical lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, and involved surgical margins had significantly negative impact on survival rates. CONCLUSION The age-adjusted incidence has been stable for a period of 26 years. Multivariate analysis confirmed that histological grade, advanced stage, involved surgical margins and vascular invasion are independent negative prognostic factors. Survival rates were stationary compared to earlier reports.
Collapse
|
5
|
Predictive Value of the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index for Outcomes After Hepatic Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. World J Surg 2020; 44:3901-3914. [PMID: 32651603 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05686-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) on outcomes after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS We assessed 763 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC. The ACCI scores were categorized as follows: ACCI ≤ 5, ACCI = 6, and ACCI ≥ 7. RESULTS A multivariate analysis showed that the odds ratios for postoperative complications in ACCI = 6 and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, with reference to ACCI ≤ 5 group, were 0.71 (p = 0.41) and 4.15 (p < 0.001), respectively. The hazard ratios for overall survival of ACCI = 6 and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, with reference to ACCI ≤ 5 group, were 1.52 (p = 0.023) and 2.45 (p < 0.001), respectively. The distribution of deaths due to HCC-related, liver-related, and other causes was 68.2%, 11.8%, and 20% in ACCI ≤ 5 group, 47.2%, 13.9%, and 38.9% in ACCI = 6 group, and 27.3%, 9.1%, and 63.6% in ACCI ≥ 7 group (p = 0.053; ACCI ≤ 5 vs. = 6, p = 0.19; ACCI = 6 vs. ≥ 7, p < 0.001; ACCI ≤ 5 vs. ≥ 7). In terms of the treatment for HCC recurrence in ACCI ≤ 5, ACCI = 6, and ACCI ≥ 7 groups, adaptation rate of surgical resection was 20.1%, 7.3%, and 11.1% and the rate of palliative therapy was 4.3%, 12.2%, and 22.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The ACCI predicted the short-term and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection of HCC. These findings will help physicians establish a treatment strategy for HCC patients with comorbidities.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ketterer MC, Konrad Dahlem KK, Häussler SM, Jakob TF, Pfeiffer J, Becker C. Clinical Significance and Indication for Surgical Treatment of Occult Cervical and Intraglandular Nodal Involvement in Parotid Malignancy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77:2355-2361. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
Abdel Razek AK, Elkhamary S, Nada N. Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histopathological parameters of salivary gland cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 48:995-1000. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
8
|
Mannelli G, Alessandro F, Martina F, Lorenzo C, Bettiol A, Vannacci A, Oreste G. Nomograms predictive for oncological outcomes in malignant parotid tumours: recurrence and mortality rates of 228 patients from a single institution. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 279:4491-4503. [PMID: 31346721 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05556-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Malignant parotid tumours are rare and multiple prognostic factors exist. METHODS Through a retrospective study we aimed to identify nomograms predicting recurrence and mortality rates in 228 primary parotid cancers. Patients clinical, treatment and tumour characteristics were retrospectively collected between 1980 and 2005 at our Institution. Factors predictive of disease-free-specific-survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Nomograms were then constructed. RESULTS The 5- and 10-year DSS rates were 73% and 71.4%, and nomogram was drawn based on five parameters where perineural invasion showed the most significant predicting influence (p < 0.001). The median follow-up was of 95 months and the 5- and 10-year OS rates were 68.7% and 53.1%; six predictive variables (age, histological grade, perineural invasion, pathological lymph node status, resection margins and distant metastasis) were used to create nomogram. CONCLUSIONS Our nomograms provide a tailored outcome to a patient affected by malignant parotid tumour and give him/her a risk assessment for recurrence and mortality based on individual factors by a concordance index > 0.8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuditta Mannelli
- Head and Neck and Robotic Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, CAP 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | | | - Fasolati Martina
- Head and Neck and Robotic Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, CAP 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Cecconi Lorenzo
- Department of Statistic, Computer Science, Application, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bettiol
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Phytovigilance, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alfredo Vannacci
- Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Tuscan Regional Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Phytovigilance, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gallo Oreste
- Otorhinolaryngology Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sex disparities in salivary malignancies: Does female sex impact oncological outcome? Oral Oncol 2019; 94:86-92. [PMID: 31178218 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous population-based studies in salivary gland carcinomas have described a relationship between female sex and superior oncological outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our institutional database of 884 surgically treated patients with salivary gland malignancies from 1985 to 2015 was analyzed for the impact of sex on oncological outcomes. Histologies were classified in three risk groups, low, intermediate and high. Survival outcomes were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios for male sex were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Eight hundred sixty-seven patients were identified; median age was 59 years, and 51% had a minor salivary gland malignancy. Female patients were younger (58 versus 60 years; p = 0.040) and had a lower incidence of high-risk histologies (25% versus 40%, p < 0.001) and T3-T4 tumors compared to men (23% versus 31%, p < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 57 months, female patients had a superior 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) (90% versus 79%; p < 0.001). The unadjusted hazard ratio showed male patients had a 2.15-fold increased risk of death (HR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.50-3.06, p < 0.001). After adjusting for Charlson comorbidity index, tobacco use, histological risk group, and overall pathological stage, males still had a statistically significant increased risk of death (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.05-2.17; p = 0.047). Subgroup analysis showed DSS for females was significantly better in the high-risk histological group (5-year 68% versus 49%, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION Our study shows that sex has an impact on cancer-specific survival and that female sex favors improved survival.
Collapse
|
10
|
Iwata AJ, Williams AM, Taylor AR, Chang SS. Socioeconomic disparities and comorbidities, not race, affect salivary gland malignancy survival outcomes. Laryngoscope 2017; 127:2545-2550. [PMID: 28498500 DOI: 10.1002/lary.26633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS This study sought to determine whether comorbidities, race, and socioeconomic factors affect 5- and 10-year survival outcomes for patients with salivary gland malignancies treated at a single large academic institution with a large African American population. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients with salivary gland malignancies, from 1990 to 2015, at a large academic medical center. METHODS Standard statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates decreased with age ≥ 60 years (P < .001), stage 3 or 4 (P < .001), clinical T stage 3 or 4 (P < .001), and clinical N stage 1, 2, or 3 (P < .001). Living in a ZIP code with an increasing proportion of residents with a high school degree or less (P < .05), being male (P < .05), increasing age at the time of diagnosis (P < .001), and increasing Charlson comorbidity index (P < .05) detrimentally impacted survival at 5 and 10 years. Race was associated with socioeconomic variables, but race was not a prognostic indicator of survival. CONCLUSIONS Socioeconomic factors and comorbidities, not race, were negative prognostic indicators of survival of patients with salivary gland malignancies. Using race as a marker for socioeconomic status should be used with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4. Laryngoscope, 127:2545-2550, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew R Taylor
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | | |
Collapse
|