The forthcoming revision of the diagnostic and classificatory system: perspectives based on the European psychiatric tradition

DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences—part 2: bipolar disorders, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, personality disorders, substance-related and addictive disorders, neurocognitive disorders

Part 1 of this paper discussed several more general aspects of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and offered a detailed, paradigmatic analysis of changes made to the chapter on depressive disorders. This second part focusses on several other disorders, including bipolar and schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The respective changes and their possible consequences are discussed under consideration of traditional psychiatric classification, particularly from the perspective of European traditions and on the basis of a PubMed search and review papers. The general conclusion is that even seemingly small changes such as the introduction of the mixed feature specifier can have far-reaching consequences. Contrary to the original plans, DSM-5 has not radically changed to become a primarily dimensional diagnostic system but has preserved the categorical system for most disorders. The ambivalence of the respective decision-making becomes apparent from the last minute decision to change the classification of personality disorders from dimensional back to categorical. The advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches are discussed in this context. In DSM-5, only the chapter on addictive disorders has a somewhat dimensional structure. Also in contrast to the original intentions, DSM-5 has not used a more neurobiological approach to disorders by including biological markers to increase the objectivity of psychiatric diagnoses. Even in the most advanced field in terms of biomarkers, the neurocognitive disorders, the primarily symptom-based, descriptive approach has been preserved and the well-known amyloid-related and other biomarkers are not included. This is because, even after so many years of biomarker research, the results are still not considered to be robust enough to use in clinical practice.

DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences--part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders

DSM-5 was published in 2013 after about 10 years of preparation. Part 1 of this paper discusses several more general aspects of DSM-5 and offers a detailed, paradigmatic analysis of changes made to the chapter on depressive disorders. The background for the changes is analysed on the basis of a PubMed search and review papers on the classification of mental disorders in general and on empirical knowledge about individual disorders. Contrary to the original plans, DSM-5 has not introduced a primarily dimensional diagnostic system but has widely preserved the categorical system of disorders. Also, it has not adopted a more neurobiological approach to disorders by including biological markers to increase the objectivity of psychiatric diagnoses but has maintained the primarily symptom-based, descriptive approach. The criteria for some disorders have been changed, including affective, schizophrenic and addiction disorders, and a few new disorders have been added. A minimal version of the dimensional approach was realised through the introduction of several transnosological specifiers and the option to make symptom- or syndrome-related severity and dimensional assessments. These specifiers and assessments might allow a more individualised description of a patient's psychopathological state and more personalised treatment. However, most of the symptom- and syndrome-related assessments are not mandatory and therefore may not be used in clinical practice.

The consequences of DSM-5 for psychiatric diagnosis and psychopharmacotherapy

OBJECTIVE

After 10 years of preparation, DSM-5 was published in 2013. This paper will examine the possible effects of DSM-5 on psychiatric diagnosis and psychopharmacotherapy.

METHODS

DSM-5 was compared with DSM-IV to identify the important changes in psychiatric diagnosis and possible consequences for psychopharmacotherapy.

RESULTS

Contrary to the original plans, DSM-5 did not make radical changes and move towards dimensional diagnosis but preserved the previous categorical system of disorders and a primarily symptom-based descriptive approach. The dimensional approach was only adopted through the introduction of several transnosological specifiers and the option to make symptom- or syndrome-related assessments. The criteria for some disorders were changed, including affective, dependence and schizophrenic disorders, and a few new disorders were added.

CONCLUSION

The DSM-IV diagnostic system was largely preserved, although some changes were made, primarily in the field of affective disorder and in several criteria sets. The new transnosological specifiers, severity assessments and cross-cutting dimensional assessments may help to individualise treatment.

Prevalence of chronic health conditions in children with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review

A systematic review of the prevalence rates of chronic health conditions in populations of children with intellectual disability was provided. We identified 2,994 relevant studies by searching Medline, Cinahl, and PsycINFO databases from 1996 to 2008. We included the 31 studies that had sufficient methodological quality. The 6 most prevalent chronic health conditions in children with intellectual disability were epilepsy (22.0/100), cerebral palsy (19.8/100), any anxiety disorder (17.1/100), oppositional defiant disorder (12.4/100), Down syndrome (11.0/100), and autistic disorder (10.1/100). The reported prevalence rates of chronic health conditions in this population was much higher than in the general population. However, both the number of studies that were included and the number of chronic health conditions they reported about were limited. There is an urgent need for better evidence on the prevalence of chronic health conditions among children with intellectual disability.

The Munich 15-year follow-up study (MUFUSSAD) on first-hospitalized patients with schizophrenic or affective disorders: assessing courses, types and time stability of diagnostic classification

OBJECTIVE

In the context of the development of DSM-V and ICD-11 it appears to be useful to get further data on the validity of the diagnostic differentiation between schizophrenic and affective disorders. This study investigated the relevance of the main diagnostic groups schizophrenia, schizoaffective psychosis and affective disorder in the context of different diagnostic systems (ICD-9, ICD-10, DSM -IV), assessing their time stability, long-term courses, types and functional outcome.

METHODS

A total of 323 first hospitalized inpatients of the Psychiatric Department of the University Munich were recruited at index time. The full follow-up evaluation including standardized assessment procedures could be performed in 197 patients.

RESULTS

The re-diagnosis of the patients' disorders shows that with the transition from ICD-9 to ICD-10 or DSM-IV, the group of affective disorders increased numerically while the diagnostic groups of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders decreased in size. The structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID) analysis showed that altogether ICD-10 and DSM-IV had a relatively high diagnostic stability. Of the patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia, 57% had a chronic course; 61% of the patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia. Patients with affective disorders, according either to ICD-10 or DSM-IV, had in more than 90% of the cases an episodic-remitting course. In terms of prediction of long-term outcome regarding the differentiation between chronic and non-chronic course, the ICD-10 diagnoses did give a slightly better predictive result than a dimensional approach based on the key psychopathological syndrome scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The differentiation between schizophrenic and affective disorders seems meaningful especially under predictive aspects. A dimensional syndromatological description does not exceed the predictive power of the investigated main diagnostic categories, but might increase the clinically relevant information.

Adjunctive valproate in panic disorder patients with comorbid bipolar disorder or otherwise resistant to standard antidepressants: a 3-year "open" follow-up study

The aim of the study was to report on the clinical utility of naturalistic adjunctive treatment with valproate (VPA) in a group of panic disorder (PD) patients with comorbid bipolar disorder (BD) or otherwise resistant to antidepressants. The hypothesis was that these patients might not respond because of coexisting low-grade mood instability and adjunctive VPA treatment might ameliorate PD symptoms. A group of 47 patients with lifetime comorbid BD (n = 35, 74.5%) or otherwise resistant to antidepressants (n = 12, 25.6%), from a population of 326 consecutive outpatients with PD-Agoraphobia evaluated and treated at the Psychiatric Institute of the University of Pisa from 1991 to 1995, and followed for a period of 3 years. All patients were evaluated at baseline and at least every 2 months by means of an intensive interview including semi-structured and structured instruments (SCID, Life-Up, and Panic Disorder/Agoraphobia Interview). Mean dosage was 687 (SD = 234) mg/day (min 400, max 1,500 mg/day). Adjunctive treatment with VPA was well tolerated by all subjects, and there was no treatment interruption because of side effects or adverse events. All antidepressants-resistant subjects and 31 of 35 (88.6%) patients with bipolar comorbidity achieved symptomatological remission. During the observation period, 7 (58.3%) among resistant subjects and 17 (48.6%) of bipolar patients had a relapse of panic disorder after remission. Survival analysis of remission durations and onset relapses for PD and Agoraphobia did not show significant differences between the two groups. Relapses of Agoraphobia were less frequent and more delayed than those for panic. According to the results, VPA seems to be an effective and a well-tolerated adjunctive treatment in PD patients who were resistant to antidepressant therapy or had BD in comorbidity. The results of the study support the hypothesis of resistance to antidepressant treatment being related to mood instability.

[In memory of the life and work of Helmut Rennert (1920-1994)]

To mark the 90th anniversary of the birth of Helmut Rennert (1920-1994) in 2010 an overview of his biography and scientific work will be given to highlight his important contribution to the classification of psychoses. He rose to prominence above all with his model of the universal genesis of endogenous psychosis in which Rennert advocated the idea of unitary psychosis. The lively discussion regarding nosological, categorical, syndromatological and dimensional approaches for the further development of classification systems of mental disorders illustrates the prevailing relevance of his ideas. For the first time it was possible to access the archival sources in the German Academy of Sciences Leopoldina and the University of Halle (Saale) for this purpose. In addition, the personal experiences of former staff members and representatives in the field of psychiatry assisted in compiling a comprehensive picture of Rennert as a teacher and colleague who contributed a great deal to the development of psychiatry in East Germany.

Development of DSM-V and ICD-11: tendencies and potential of new classifications in psychiatry at the current state of knowledge

A reason for the necessity to revise ICD-10 and DSM-IV is the increase of knowledge in the past 20 years, especially neurobiological knowledge. But is this increase of knowledge, for example in the field of neurogenetics, of such magnitude that a revision of the psychiatric classification is necessary and promises to be fruitful? The current plans for DSM-V or ICD-11, respectively, focus on different improvements. In this context also the introduction of a purely syndromatic/dimensional approach without including etiopathogenetic hypotheses, is discussed. A switch to such a dimensional approach, which was discussed among others in the DSM-V task force Deconstructing Psychosis, would be the most radical development. It could avoid many theoretical pre-assumptions about causal hypotheses, which are still associated with ICD-10 and DSM-IV. This would indeed increase the validity of psychiatric classification, but it would also reduce the information as compared to traditional diagnostic categories with all the current implications concerning etiopathogenesis, therapy and prognosis. Such a dimensional approach would also mean that the syndromes would have to be assessed in a standardized way for each person seeking help from the psychiatric service system or for each person undergoing psychiatric research. This would have to be a multi-dimensional assessment covering all syndromes existing within different psychiatric disorders. Based on the different aspects that must be considered in this context, a careful revision seems more advisable than a radical change of classification.