Reducing antipsychotic drugs in stable patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a randomized controlled pilot trial

Antipsychotic dose reduction and discontinuation versus maintenance treatment in people with schizophrenia and other recurrent psychotic disorders in England (the RADAR trial): an open, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Maintenance antipsychotic medication is recommended for people with schizophrenia or recurrent psychosis, but the adverse effects are burdensome, and evidence on long-term outcomes is sparse. We aimed to assess the benefits and harms of a gradual process of antipsychotic reduction compared with maintenance treatment. Our hypothesis was that antipsychotic reduction would improve social functioning with a short-term increase in relapse.

METHODS

RADAR was an open, parallel-group, randomised trial done in 19 National Health Service Trusts in England. Participants were aged 18 years and older, had a diagnosis of recurrent, non-affective psychotic disorder, and were prescribed an antipsychotic. Exclusion criteria included people who had a mental health crisis or hospital admission in the past month, were considered to pose a serious risk to themselves or others by a treating clinician, or were mandated to take antipsychotic medication under the Mental Health Act. Through an independent, internet-based system, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to gradual, flexible antipsychotic reduction, overseen by treating clinicians, or to maintenance. Participants and clinicians were aware of treatment allocations, but assessors were masked to them. Follow-up was for 2 years. Social functioning, assessed by the Social Functioning Scale, was the primary outcome. The principal secondary outcome was severe relapse, defined as requiring admission to hospital. Analysis was done blind to group identity using intention-to-treat data. The trial is completed and has been registered with ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN90298520) and with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03559426).

FINDINGS

4157 people were screened, of whom 253 were randomly allocated, including 168 (66%) men, 82 (32%) women, and 3 (1%) transgender people, with a mean age of 46 years (SD 12, range 22-79). 171 (67%) participants were White, 52 (21%) were Black, 16 (6%) were Asian, and 12 (5%) were of other ethnicity. The median dose reduction at any point during the trial was 67% in the reduction group and zero in the maintenance group; at 24 months it was 33% versus zero. At the 24-month follow-up, we assessed 90 of 126 people assigned to the antipsychotic dose reduction group and 94 of 127 assigned to the maintenance group, finding no difference in the Social Functioning Scale (β 0·19, 95% CI -1·94 to 2·33; p=0·86). There were 93 serious adverse events in the reduction group affecting 49 individuals, mainly comprising admission for a mental health relapse, and 64 in the maintenance group, relating to 29 individuals.

INTERPRETATION

At 2-year follow-up, a gradual, supported process of antipsychotic dose reduction had no effect on social functioning. Our data can help to inform decisions about the use of long-term antipsychotic medication.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research.

Guided antipsychotic reduction to reach minimum effective dose (GARMED) in patients with remitted psychosis: a 2-year randomized controlled trial with a naturalistic cohort

BACKGROUND

Patients with remitted psychosis face a dilemma between the wish to discontinue antipsychotics and the risk of relapse. We test if an operationalized guided-dose-reduction algorithm can help reach a lower effective dose without increased risks of relapse.

METHODS

A 2-year open-label randomized prospective comparative cohort trial from Aug 2017 to Sep 2022. Patients with a history of schizophrenia-related psychotic disorders under stable medications and symptoms were eligible, randomized 2:1 into guided dose reduction group (GDR) v. maintenance treatment group (MT1), together with a group of naturalistic maintenance controls (MT2). We observed if the relapse rates would be different between 3 groups, to what extent the dose could be reduced, and if GDR patients could have improved functioning and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients, comprised 51, 24, and 21 patients in GDR, MT1, and MT2 groups, respectively. During follow-up, 14 patients (14.6%) relapsed, including 6, 4, and 4 from GDR, MT1, and MT2, statistically no difference between groups. In total, 74.5% of GDR patients could stay well under a lower dose, including 18 patients (35.3%) conducting 4 consecutive dose-tapering and staying well after reducing 58.5% of their baseline dose. The GDR group exhibited improved clinical outcomes and endorsed better quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

GDR is a feasible approach as the majority of patients had a chance to taper antipsychotics to certain extents. Still, 25.5% of GDR patients could not successfully decrease any dose, including 11.8% experienced relapse, a risk comparable to their maintenance counterparts.

Time-dependent effect of antipsychotic discontinuation and dose reduction on social functioning and subjective quality of life-a multilevel meta-analysis

Background

Meta-analyses indicate superiority of antipsychotic maintenance treatment over discontinuation within up to 24 months after treatment initiation for patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. In terms of functional recovery, long-term trials show improved functioning after discontinuation, suggesting a time-dependent effect of antipsychotic maintenance. However, these trials were not included in previous meta-analyses. We therefore investigated whether the effect of antipsychotic maintenance treatment vs. discontinuation on social functioning and quality of life varies by trial length.

Methods

The study was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42021248933). PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase and trial registers were systematically searched on 8th November 2021 and updated on 25th June, 2023 and 10th August, 2023 for studies that compared antipsychotic maintenance to discontinuation and reported data on social functioning or subjective quality of life in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB 2, the ROBINS-I and the RoB-ME tools. Quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Findings

We included k = 35 studies (N = 5924) with follow-ups between one month and 15 years. Overall, maintenance and discontinuation did not differ on social functioning (k = 32; n = 5330; SMD = 0.204; p = 0.65; 95% CI [-0.69, 1.10]) or quality of life (k = 10; n = 943; SMD = -0.004; p = 0.97; 95% CI [-0.22, 0.21]), whilst subgroup analyses of middle- (2-5 years; k = 7; n = 1032; SMD = 0.68; 95% CI [0.06, 1.28]) and long-term follow-ups (>5 years; k = 2; n = 356; SMD = 1.04; 95% CI [0.82, 1.27]) significantly favoured discontinuation. However, the quality of evidence was rated as very low.

Interpretation

Although our findings suggest a time-dependent decrease in the effect of maintenance treatment on social functioning, interpretation of these findings is limited by the serious risk of bias in middle- and long-term trials. Therefore, any conclusions regarding the long-term benefits of antipsychotic treatment or discontinuation for functional recovery are premature and more high-quality trials tailored to comparing state of the art maintenance treatment vs. discontinuation are needed.

Funding

None.

Implementing gradual, hyperbolic tapering of long-acting injectable antipsychotics by prolonging the inter-dose interval: an in silico modelling study

Gradual, hyperbolic tapering has been proposed as a method to reduce the risk of withdrawal effects and potential relapse of an underlying condition by minimising disruption of existing equilibria. We applied hyperbolic tapering principles in silico to long-acting aripiprazole to generate regimens for withdrawal in clinical practice. We derived thresholds for taper rates using existing studies and consensus. Using pharmacokinetic data for aripiprazole long-acting injectable antipsychotic (ALAI), we conducted in silico modelling to examine the impact of abrupt cessation of long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) medication and the effect of prolonging inter-dose interval on plasma aripiprazole levels and consequent D2 occupancy. We also modelled transitions from LAI medication to oral medication. Regimens were designed to afford a rate of reduction between 5 and 12.5 percentage points of D2 occupancy per month. Abrupt discontinuation of ALAI was shown to lead to a maximal D2 occupancy reduction of 16.8 percentage points per month; prolongation of the inter-dose interval of ALAI produced a slower reduction. Specifically, hyperbolic tapering was afforded by prolongation of a 400 mg ALAI inter-dose interval from 4 to 7 weeks, before reducing the dose to 300 mg ALAI. This could then be administered at up to 4-week (for 6% maximal D2 occupancy change), 6-week (9% change) or 7-week (11% change) intervals. Switching to oral medication - 5, 2.5 and 1.25 mg for the three regimens, respectively - is required for ALAI to complete full cessation to prevent too rapid a reduction in D2 occupancy. Oral medication should probably be maintained at a consistent dose for 3-6 months before further reductions to account for residual LAI being concurrently eliminated. Hyperbolic dose tapering is possible with ALAI through prolongation of the inter-dose interval and may reduce the risk of relapse compared to abrupt discontinuation of LAI medication.

Dose-tapering trajectories in patients with remitted psychosis undergoing guided antipsychotic reduction to reach minimum effective dose

BACKGROUND

Patients with remitted psychosis wish to reduce antipsychotic doses yet facing increased risks of relapse. Examining dose-tapering processes may provide insights to re-evaluate the risk-to-benefit balance. We aimed to depict and subgroup tapering trajectories, and explore factors associated with different dose-reduction patterns.

METHODS

A 2-year open-label randomized prospective comparative trial from August 2017 to September 2022 in Taiwan. Patients with a history of schizophrenia-related psychotic disorders under stable medications and symptoms were eligible, randomizing a proportion to conduct guided dose reduction. We depicted the trajectories of individual patients and named subgroups based on dose-tapering patterns. Predictors of baseline characteristics for designated subgroups were examined by logistic regression analysis; changes in outcomes were compared by paired t-test.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients undergoing guided dose reduction, 18 (35.3%) reduced 4 steps consecutively (sequential reducers, SR), 14 (27.5%) reduced 1 to 3 steps (modest reducers, MR), 3 (5.9%) re-escalated to previous level (alert reducers, AR), 7 (13.7%) returned to baseline level (baseline returners, BR), 6 (11.7%) relapsed (failed reducers, FR) and 3 (5.9%) withdrew without relapse (early exits, EE). Patients with a history of relapse assumed a conservative dose-tapering pace; only the SR subgroup exhibited significant improvements in functioning and quality of life while failing to identify variables for predicting who would become SR or FR.

CONCLUSIONS

Guided dose reduction comprises dynamic processes with differences between individual trajectories. The proposed naming of dose-tapering patterns/subgroups provides a framework depicting patients undergoing dose-tapering. Longer-term observation and more flexible tapering approaches are anticipated to reveal favorable outcomes.

A Systematic Review of the Need for Guideline Recommendations; Slow Tapering vs. Maintenance Dose in Long-Term Antipsychotic Treatment: 2022

The act of discontinuing the antipsychotic medication may be directly associated with relapse. This relationship might be due to adaptations that continue to exist after treatment is stopped, such as dopaminergic hypersensitivity. Therefore, more progressive weaning off antipsychotic medication may help reduce the likelihood of relapse when the medication is stopped. As there is a need to gradually reduce or stop using antipsychotic medication, our team tried to conduct a more in-depth search to give further answers to the suggested recommendations. Around 192 articles were gathered for our research, but we could only narrow our search to 36, which were further filtered, and eight were used. We went through all of the pertinent information available until May 2022 and reviewed it to determine the risks associated with prolonged antipsychotic usage and abrupt cessation in the psychotic spectrum of diseases. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Psychiatry Online were the databases used, and the keywords that were looked for and utilized were antipsychotics, tapering, relapse, maintenance dosage, schizophrenia, and psychosis. The recurrence incidence was high in patients in whom antipsychotics were stopped and in whom the dosage was quickly lowered. Patients who were gradually weaned off their antipsychotic medication and kept on the lowest effective dose had a much lower risk of experiencing a relapse. We suggest more studies, including randomized clinical trials and monitoring, considering the enhancement of guidelines for the total cessation of antipsychotic medication use.

Switching from risperidone to paliperidone palmitate in schizophrenia: Changes in social functioning and cognitive performance

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest that paliperidone might show a better profile for social functioning and cognitive abilities than risperidone. We aimed to study whether switching from risperidone to paliperidone palmitate (PP) is associated with improved cognitive abilities at 3 or 6 months after the switch.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia were studied. All patients were treated with oral risperidone or risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) and had an indication to be switched to PP by their psychiatrists. Statistical analyses were conducted in a final sample of 27 patients who completed the follow-up visits. Three assessments were completed: 1) baseline (preswitch), 2) 3 months postswitch, and 3) 6 months postswitch. Social functioning at each visit was assessed with the Personal and Social Performance Scale. Cognitive assessment was conducted at each visit with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery. Statistical analyses were performed with R. Linear mixed models were used to explore longitudinal changes in social functioning and cognitive outcomes.

RESULTS

PSP scores significantly improved over time after the switch from risperidone to PP. A sensitivity analysis found a significant negative interaction between time and PP maintenance doses (greater improvement in those patients receiving lower doses when compared to higher doses). Regarding longitudinal changes in cognitive functioning, patients improved in 6 out of 10 cognitive tasks involving processing speed, working memory, visual memory, reasoning and problem solving, and attention and vigilance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that switching from risperidone to PP in patients with schizophrenia is associated with an improvement in social functioning and cognitive performance.

Risk Factors for Psychotic Relapse After Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Antipsychotics in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Although maintenance treatment with antipsychotics protects against psychotic relapse, high doses may hamper recovery. Therefore, dose reduction or discontinuation may be considered in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Here, we identified risk factors for psychotic relapse when doses are reduced.

STUDY DESIGN

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO from January 1950 through January 2021 and reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported relapse rates after antipsychotic dose reduction or discontinuation in patients with chronic schizophrenia. We calculated relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per person-year and sought to identify potential risk factors for relapse. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017058296).

STUDY RESULTS

Forty-seven RCTs (54 patient cohorts, 1746 person-years) were included. The RR for psychotic relapse with dose reduction/discontinuation versus maintenance treatment was 2.3 per person-year (95% CI: 1.9 to 2.8). The RR was higher with antipsychotic discontinuation, dose reduction to less than 3-5 mg haloperidol equivalent (HE), or relatively rapid dose reduction (<10 weeks). The RR was lower with long-acting injectable agents versus oral antipsychotic dose reduction. Other factors that increased the risk of psychotic relapse were younger age and short follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should take several risk factors for psychotic relapse into account when considering dose reduction in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Studies of a relatively fast reduction in antipsychotic dose support a minimum dose of 3-5 mg HE. However, if the dose is tapered more gradually, relapses related to medication withdrawal might be avoided, possibly enabling lower-end doses to be achieved.

Association of empathy with clinical symptoms and cognitive function in Chinese chronic schizophrenia patients with and without deficit syndrome

BACKGROUND

Patients with deficit syndrome (DS) are known to experience cognitive impairment. However, there is no consistent conclusion on the impairment of neurocognitive features in DS patients, and no studies have examined their empathy. The purpose of this study was to compare neurocognition and empathy in patients with DS and non-DS schizophrenia.

METHODS

Totally, 665 patients with chronic schizophrenia were enrolled. DS patients were identified by the Proxy Scale for Deficit Syndrome (PDS). Neurocognition and social cognition were assessed by Repeatable Battery for the measurement of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), respectively. In addition, psychopathological symptom severity was assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

RESULTS

Participants included 150 patients with DS and 140 patients with non-DS. DS patients performed significantly worse on the all RBANS domain (except for visuospatial) and total scores as well as IRI scores. Regression analysis showed that PANSS general psychopathology and education were associated with RBANS total score in the DS group (adjusted R² = 0.29), while education and PANSS negative symptoms were correlated with RBANS total score in non-DS patients (adjusted R² = 0.33). In the non-DS group, suicide attempts and PANSS negative symptom score were independently associated with IRI total score (adjusted R² = 0.06), whereas in the DS group, no variable was associated with IRI total score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that patients with DS may have poor neurocognitive and empathy performance. In chronic schizophrenia patients, negative symptoms may play a different role in cognition between DS and non-DS groups.

Antipsychotic dose reduction compared to dose continuation for people with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs are the mainstay treatment for schizophrenia, yet they are associated with diverse and potentially dose-related side effects which can reduce quality of life. For this reason, the lowest possible doses of antipsychotics are generally recommended, but higher doses are often used in clinical practice. It is still unclear if and how antipsychotic doses could be reduced safely in order to minimise the adverse-effect burden without increasing the risk of relapse.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of reducing antipsychotic dose compared to continuing the current dose for people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on 10 February 2021 at the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN, and WHO ICTRP. We also inspected the reference lists of included studies and previous reviews.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any dose reduction against continuation in people with schizophrenia or related disorders who were stabilised on their current antipsychotic treatment.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently screened relevant records for inclusion, extracted data from eligible studies, and assessed the risk of bias using RoB 2. We contacted study authors for missing data and additional information. Our primary outcomes were clinically important change in quality of life,  rehospitalisations and dropouts due to adverse effects; key secondary outcomes were clinically important change in functioning, relapse, dropouts for any reason, and at least one adverse effect. We also examined scales measuring symptoms, quality of life, and functioning as well as a comprehensive list of specific adverse effects. We pooled outcomes at the endpoint preferably closest to one year. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 RCTs, of which 22 studies provided data with 2635 participants (average age 38.4 years old). The median study sample size was 60 participants (ranging from 18 to 466 participants) and length was 37 weeks (ranging from 12 weeks to 2 years). There were variations in the dose reduction strategies in terms of speed of reduction (i.e. gradual in about half of the studies (within 2 to 16 weeks) and abrupt in the other half), and in terms of degree of reduction (i.e. median planned reduction of 66% of the dose up to complete withdrawal in three studies). We assessed risk of bias across outcomes predominantly as some concerns or high risk.  No study reported data on the number of participants with a clinically important change in quality of life or functioning, and only eight studies reported continuous data on scales measuring quality of life or functioning. There was no difference between dose reduction and continuation on scales measuring quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.17 to 0.15, 6 RCTs, n = 719, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence) and scales measuring functioning (SMD 0.03, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.17, 6 RCTs, n = 966, I2 = 0%, high certainty evidence). Dose reduction in comparison to continuation may increase the risk of rehospitalisation based on data from eight studies with estimable effect sizes; however, the 95% CI does not exclude the possibility of no difference (risk ratio (RR) 1.53, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.81, 8 RCTs, n = 1413, I2 = 59% (moderate heterogeneity), very low certainty evidence). Similarly, dose reduction increased the risk of relapse based on data from 20 studies (RR 2.16, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.06, 20 RCTs, n = 2481, I2 = 70% (substantial heterogeneity), low certainty evidence).   More participants in the dose reduction group in comparison to the continuation group left the study early due to adverse effects (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.49, 6 RCTs with estimable effect sizes, n = 1079, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence) and for any reason (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.81, 12 RCTs, n = 1551, I2 = 48% (moderate heterogeneity), moderate certainty evidence). Lastly, there was no difference between the dose reduction and continuation groups in the number of participants with at least one adverse effect based on data from four studies with estimable effect sizes (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.12, 5 RCTs, n = 998 (4 RCTs, n = 980 with estimable effect sizes), I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review synthesised the latest evidence on the reduction of antipsychotic doses for stable individuals with schizophrenia. There was no difference between dose reduction and continuation groups in quality of life, functioning, and number of participants with at least one adverse effect. However, there was a higher risk for relapse and dropouts, and potentially for rehospitalisations, with dose reduction. Of note, the majority of the trials focused on relapse prevention rather potential beneficial outcomes on quality of life, functioning, and adverse effects, and in some studies there was rapid and substantial reduction of doses. Further well-designed RCTs are therefore needed to provide more definitive answers.

Polypharmacy Management of Antipsychotics in Patients with Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychiatric disease that is characterized by psychotic symptoms, including positive, negative, affective, and aggressive symptoms, as well as cognitive dysfunction, and is primarily treated using drug therapy, the continuation of which is essential to prevent recurrence/recrudescence. Various second-generation antipsychotics with pharmacological properties or adverse events that differ from those of conventional antipsychotics have recently been introduced, and pharmaceutical management is required for drug efficacy assessments and adverse event monitoring/management of these drugs. Antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) is the gold standard treatment for schizophrenia and is recommended in various guidelines. However, a subgroup of patients with schizophrenia do not or only partially respond to APM. Therefore, antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP), in which ≥2 antipsychotics are combined, has been routinely utilized to compensate for insufficient responses to APM in clinical practice. APP has recently been proposed as an evidence-based treatment option, but does not consider clinicians' experience. However, the risk of APP-related adverse events is high. The application of APP needs to be carefully reviewed, whilst taking into consideration patient backgrounds. Furthermore, the risk of APP-related adverse events is higher in elderly patients than in the general population; therefore, caution is needed. This review discusses the merits of APP, matters that need to be considered, and a switch from APP to APM, and also focuses on the application of APP in clinical practice.

Twenty-year effects of antipsychotics in schizophrenia and affective psychotic disorders

BACKGROUND

Studies that examine course and outcome in psychosis have reported considerable heterogeneity in terms of recovery, remission, employment, symptom presentation, social outcomes, and antipsychotic medication effects. Even with demonstrated heterogeneity in course and outcome, prophylactic antipsychotic maintenance therapy remains the prominent practice, particularly in participants with schizophrenia. Lack of efficacy in maintenance antipsychotic treatment and concerns over health detriments gives cause to re-examine guidelines.

METHODS

This study was conducted as part of the Chicago follow-up study designed as a naturalistic prospective longitudinal research study to investigate the course, outcome, symptomatology, and effects of antipsychotic medication on recovery and rehospitalization in participants with serious mental illness disorders. A total of 139 participants with 734 observations were included in the analysis. GEE logistic models were applied to adjust for confounding factors measured at index hospitalization and follow-ups.

RESULTS

Our data show that the majority of participants with schizophrenia or affective psychosis experience future episodes of psychosis at some point during the 20-year follow-up. There was a significant diagnostic difference between groups showing an increase in the number of future episodes of psychosis in participants with schizophrenia. Participants with schizophrenia not on antipsychotics after the first 2 years have better outcomes than participants prescribed antipsychotics. The adjusted odds ratio of not on antipsychotic medication was 5.989 (95% CI 3.588-9.993) for recovery and 0.134 (95% CI 0.070-0.259) for rehospitalization. That is, regardless of diagnosis, after the second year, the absence of antipsychotics predicted a higher probability of recovery and lower probability of rehospitalization at subsequent follow-ups after adjusting for confounders.

CONCLUSION

This study reports multiple findings that bring into question the use of continuous antipsychotic medications, regardless of diagnosis. Even when the confound by indication for prescribing antipsychotic medication is controlled for, participants with schizophrenia and affective psychosis do better than their medicated cohorts, strongly confirming the importance of exposing the role of aiDSP and antipsychotic drug resistance.

Risk of treatment discontinuation and psychiatric hospitalization associated with early dose reduction of antipsychotic treatment in first-episode schizophrenia: A nationwide, health insurance data-based study

AIM

We investigated the impact of early dose reduction of antipsychotic treatment on the risk of treatment discontinuation and psychiatric hospitalization in patients with first-episode schizophrenia (FES).

METHODS

The Health Insurance Review Agency database in South Korea was used to include 16 153 patients with FES. At 6 months from their diagnosis, the patients were categorized by the magnitude of dose reduction (no reduction, 0%-50%, and >50%). With a reference of no reduction, the risk of treatment discontinuation and psychiatric hospitalization associated with dose reduction in the 1-year follow-up period after the first 6 months was examined with a Cox proportional hazard ratio model stratified by the mean daily olanzapine-equivalent dose in the first 3 months (<10, 10 to 20, >20 mg/day).

RESULTS

A >50% dose reduction was associated with an increased risk of treatment discontinuation in all subgroups (<10 mg/day: hazard ratio [HR] =1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.24-1.67 [P <0.01]; 10-20 mg/day: HR =1.60, 95% CI =1.37-1.86 [P <0.01]; and >20 mg/day: HR =1.62, 95% CI =1.37-1.91 [P <0.01]). In the subgroup taking <10 mg/day, an association of 0%-50% dose reduction with an increased risk of treatment discontinuation was observed (HR =1.20, 95% CI =1.09-1.31; P <0.01). A > 50% dose reduction was associated with increased risk of psychiatric hospitalization only in the subgroup taking <10 mg/day (HR =1.48, 95% CI =1.21-1.80; P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that an above certain dose of antipsychotic drugs is required to prevent psychiatric hospitalization, and extensive dose reduction of antipsychotic drugs could result in a higher risk of treatment discontinuation.

A Method for Tapering Antipsychotic Treatment That May Minimize the Risk of Relapse

The process of stopping antipsychotics may be causally related to relapse, potentially linked to neuroadaptations that persist after cessation, including dopaminergic hypersensitivity. Therefore, the risk of relapse on cessation of antipsychotics may be minimized by more gradual tapering. There is converging evidence that suggests that adaptations to antipsychotic exposure can persist for months or years after stopping the medication-from animal studies, observation of tardive dyskinesia in patients, and the clustering of relapses in this time period after the cessation of antipsychotics. Furthermore, PET imaging demonstrates a hyperbolic relationship between doses of antipsychotic and D2 receptor blockade. We, therefore, suggest that when antipsychotics are reduced, it should be done gradually (over months or years) and in a hyperbolic manner (to reduce D2 blockade "evenly"): ie, reducing by one quarter (or one half) of the most recent dose of antipsychotic, equivalent approximately to a reduction of 5 (or 10) percentage points of its D2 blockade, sequentially (so that reductions become smaller and smaller in size as total dose decreases), at intervals of 3-6 months, titrated to individual tolerance. Some patients may prefer to taper at 10% or less of their most recent dose each month. This process might allow underlying adaptations time to resolve, possibly reducing the risk of relapse on discontinuation. Final doses before complete cessation may need to be as small as 1/40th a therapeutic dose to prevent a large decrease in D2 blockade when stopped. This proposal should be tested in randomized controlled trials.

Inflammatory processes linked to major depression and schizophrenic disorders and the effects of polypharmacy in psychiatry: evidence from a longitudinal study of 279 patients under therapy

Over the past 2 decades, polypharmacy has become the de-facto standard of acute treatment in psychiatry where patients with psychiatric disorders receive a multiple medication regimen. There is growing evidence for a potential link between major psychiatric disorders and inflammatory processes. Combining these two aspects aims at avoiding polypharmacy attempts among patients with inflammatory activation through alternative treatment strategies. In this study, we addressed the following questions: (1) to what extent can polypharmacy be explained through the factors "diagnosis", "previous history", "severity at baseline", "age", "gender", and "psychiatrist in charge"; (2) what are the differences between polypharmacy and monotherapy regarding efficacy and side effect profiles; and (3) what amount of between-patient variance is explainable by the natural antibody immunoglobulin M (IgM) within each diagnostic group. This naturalistic longitudinal study was comprised of 279 patients under therapy with a clinical diagnosis of depressive (ICD-10: "F3x.x"; n = 195) or schizophrenic disorders (ICD-10: "F2x.x"; n = 84). The study protocol included (1) assessment of previous history by the SADS Syndrome Check List SSCL-16 (lifetime version); (2) repeated measurements over 5 weeks assessing the time course of improvement by the Hamilton Depression Scale HAM-D and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale PANSS, along with medication and unwanted side effects through the Medication and Side Effects Inventory MEDIS; and (3) the collection of blood samples from which DNA and serum were extracted. The association between inflammatory response system and psychiatric disorders was detailed by fitting multi-layer Neural Net (NN) models to the observed data ("supervised learning"). The same approach was used to set up prediction models of side effects. Our data showed that polypharmacy was omnipresent. Yet the various polypharmacy regimens had no advantage over monotherapy: we even found slightly larger baseline score reductions under monotherapy, independent of primary diagnoses and for comparable baseline severities. Most patients experienced unwanted side effects. The close link between side effects and treatment regimen was revealed by a linear model in which the mere number of drugs explained a significant (p < 0.001) proportion of the observed variance. As to the inflammatory response system: For the F2 patients, our NN model identified a 22.5% subgroup exhibiting a significant correlation of r = 0.746 (p = 0.0004) between global schizophrenia scores and IgM levels, along with a correct prediction of response of 94.4%, thus explaining 55.7% of the observed between-patient variance. For the F3 patients, our NN model identified a 19.6% subgroup exhibiting a significant correlation of r = 0.644 (p = 0.00003) between global depression scores and IgM levels, along a correct prediction of response of 89.6%, thus explaining 41.4% of the observed between-patient variance. Polypharmacy is omnipresent in today's acute treatment of psychiatric disorders. Given the large proportion of patients with unwanted side effects and the strong correlation between side effects and the number of drugs, polypharmacy approaches are not equally suited for every patient. In terms of efficacy, there are no advantages of polypharmacy over monotherapy. Most notably, our study appears to have cleared the way for the reliable identification of a subgroup of patients for whom the inflammatory response system is a promising target of therapeutic intervention.