Validation of the Applied Biosystems RapidHIT ID instrument and ACE GlobalFiler Express sample cartridge

Disaster victim identification: the co-utilisation of applied biosystems RapidHIT ID system and DJI Matrice 300 drone for onsite DNA analysis

Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) following mass fatality events is critical in bringing closure to the victims' family members and their loved ones. However, post-disaster environments are typically unfavourable and pose difficulties for the execution of DVI procedures. Delays in collecting, transporting, and processing the samples may cause DNA to degrade, adversely impacting the identification process. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the co-utilisation of RapidHIT ID (RHID) and DJI Matrice 300 (M300) for onsite DNA analysis using buccal swab samples. 40 samples (two replicates) were collected from 20 "victims" and another 40 (two replicates) from 20 corresponding "relatives". The first replicates were processed using RHID (n = 40) and the second replicates were analysed via conventional technologies (n = 40). This paper observed the genotyping success rate, kinship matching, concordance, comparing different sample collectors, storage interval, and time taken for both procedures. Results of this study showed that RHID could generate DNA profiles for all the samples (n = 40) with 90% of them showing full profiles, and managed to process samples that have been stored for up to six months. The drone-assisted procedure exhibits less time to obtain and analyse the samples but can still produce DNA profiles concordant with the conventional method (p > 0.05). In conclusion, RHID is sufficient to generate interpretable DNA profiles in harsh environments, and transporting samples by M300 drone can reduce the exposure time to process more quality DNA for DVI.

Improving the forensic genetic workflow for countries with small geographical areas: What are the options and how cost effective are they?

Forensic services worldwide often encounter considerable challenges relating to funding and infrastructure. Smaller jurisdictions or areas where forensic resources are scarce are faced with complicated choices in how they approach criminal casework, with a number of options available. Often these involve trade-offs between cost, time and data quality. Faced with such decisions it becomes important for the field to acknowledge the realities facing such jurisdictions, discuss the pros and cons of each approach, and identify a framework for making such decisions. This novel paper, reviews the available literature and identifies three main solutions for consideration: 1) the use of satellite laboratories for sample triage, 2) the use of a main regional laboratory for full forensic analysis and 3) the use of rapid DNA by police for reducing backlogs. Alongside these strategies, the impacts of cost and quality in regard to each of the stated options are considered. While the literature supports the assertion that some methods can reduce downstream costs via the reduction in turnaround times, there is limited data highlighting the business case used to support decision making when considering these options including the use of cost:benefit analyses or case studies, emphasizing the novelty of this paper. This is likely due to the commercialized nature of the forensic sector preventing the publication of a private laboratory's business approach. The lack of emphasis on the 'business case' in forensic literature has the potential to mislead R&D scientists who may consequently fail to consider such factors when performing their own research.

Success rate of rapid DNA technology in kinship analysis for forensic purpose

Reducing the time required for DNA analysis in forensic genetics can yield significant benefits, both in determining genealogical relationships for legal proceedings and in criminal cases. Swift identification of individuals plays a pivotal role in solving crimes and apprehending perpetrators. Additionally, in situations like mass disasters, prompt victim identification holds utmost importance. The Rapid DNA technology, introduced in 2012 to expedite DNA analysis, has evolved to streamline the process into a single step. This advancement not only minimizes the risk of human error and contamination, but also boasts a remarkable time advantage, delivering results in as little as 90 min. In this study, DNA profiles of 30 families (consisting of mothers, fathers, and children) were analyzed using the RapidHITTM ID System. The system automatically calculated maternity-paternity probabilities to assess the suitability of Rapid DNA technology for kinship analysis. For validation, DNA profiles were also generated using the 3500 GA method. The study revealed that 9 out of 30 families exhibited discrepancies in DNA profiling, leading to inaccuracies in automatic kinship analysis. Consequently, while the method offers rapid and user-friendly advantages for forensic sciences, the software underlying the system requires re-evaluation. Issues such as maternal-paternal exclusion in kinship analyses, arising from challenges like un-called alleles, warrant further attention.

An evaluation of the RapidHIT™ ID system for hair roots stained with Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye

The RapidHIT™ ID (RHID) system was evaluated for its suitability in processing a single hair root to obtain informative DNA profiles. Hair samples were assessed for nuclear DNA prior to DNA analysis using Diamond™ Nucleic Acid Dye (DD) and real-time Extended Depth of Field (EDF) imaging to visualise and count nuclei if present. Hairs were viewed under an Optico N300F LED Fluorescent Microscope and imaged using a MIchrome 5 Pro camera. Hair roots were processed through both the ACE GlobalFiler™ Express sample cartridge and the RapidINTEL™ sample cartridge. A total of 44 hairs including shed hairs (9) and plucked hairs (35) from 8 donors were evaluated in this study. The processing of hairs using the RHID system required the modification of a standard swab that allowed for hairs to be easily collected and placed into the cartridge but also allowed for the re-collection of hair roots post RHID analysis (for potential standard DNA workflow). 90% of plucked hairs with a high nuclei count (>100) resulted in a high partial or full DNA profile, with the remaining 10% resulting in a low partial profile. 44% of shed hairs resulted in a low partial profile, with the remaining hairs resulting in a null profile. This study demonstrated that the RHID system could successfully obtain a DNA profile from a single hair root with nuclei present post-DD staining. According to these results, it is suggested that when dealing with hairs containing fewer than 50 nuclei, using the RapidINTEL™ cartridge can enhance allele recovery.

Processing biological samples from simulated radiological terrorist events using Rapid DNA instruments

Two commercially available portable Rapid DNA instruments were evaluated for their ability to process 1 µL and 10 µL saliva samples deposited on metal and plastic surfaces and contaminated with surrogates of cesium (Cs)-137, strontium (Sr)-90 and cobalt (Co)-60; radioactive materials potentially released during a nuclear weapon accident or a radiological dispersal device detonation. A comparable success rate was noted for both Rapid DNA instruments when considering the number of complete and balanced DNA profiles, the number of profiles with a minimum of 10 autosomal STR loci (out of 23 [FlexPlex™ 27] or 21 [GlobalFiler™ Express]), and the possibility to search a national DNA database in Canada and the United States. Cobalt had an adverse impact on the quality of the megaplex short tandem repeat (STR) DNA profiles derived on each instrument for two of the three contamination levels tested in this study, i.e., 0.05 M and 0.1 M as reflected by a reduced number of detected alleles and decreased profile peak heights. Strontium exhibited some adverse effect on the Rapid DNA results when used at the highest contamination level (0.1 M) whereas cesium had none. No new artifacts were observed in the Rapid DNA profiles of samples spiked with the non-radiogenic surrogates. Importantly, in the context of a radiological/nuclear (RN) event, the ANDE™ 6C offers the possibility to dispose of all radioactive materials associated with contaminated samples quickly using a chip on which all steps of the Rapid DNA process are performed whereas the RapidHIT™ ID accumulates radioactive materials for many days before disposal. An individual handling 25 samples in a week (5 per day) on the RapidHIT™ ID at a 30.5 cm distance with a 5 min exposure to the radioactive source estimated at every run would exceed the 0.042 µSv/5 min limit with gamma dose rates for Cs at 0.13 mSv and for Co at 3.8 mSv. Beta dose rates calculated for the surrogate isotopes at the three concentrations tested were also above the recommended radiation exposure limit of 1 mSv/yr (0.042 µSv/5 min). Various potential mechanisms of action behind the interference noted for Sr and Co at high concentrations are presented. These elements may play a role in the steps prior to PCR (at the DNA molecule by binding to bases or to phosphate groups), during PCR (at the DNA polymerase as cofactors for catalytic sites), or even during amplified DNA fragment detection (as fluorescence quenchers).

Comparative analysis of two Rapid DNA technologies for the processing of blood and saliva-based samples

Rapid DNA technologies recently gained significant momentum as a means to generate DNA profiles faster than with standard laboratory workflows. Initially developed for the analysis of buccal reference samples, applications are being considered for other types of forensic samples. In this study, an identical set of 150 blood and saliva-based samples was processed using two different Rapid DNA technologies, the Applied BioSystems™ RapidHIT™ ID System using the RapidINTEL™ sample cartridge and the ANDE™ 6C Rapid DNA Analysis™ System using the I-Chip. A subset of samples were subjected to alternative collection methods or sample pre-treatments to determine the optimal strategy for each instrument. An equivalent sample set was also processed using a conventional DNA analysis workflow. The sensitivity range of the two Rapid DNA technologies was comparable based on blood and saliva dilution series, with both technologies able to generate full profiles from samples typically yielding 5-10 ng of DNA when processed using conventional DNA analysis. The brand of cotton swabs used for Rapid DNA analysis had an impact on the results for both systems. Differences were observed in success rate between the two systems when processing blood (on fabrics, FTA paper or hard surfaces) and saliva-based samples (drink containers, FTA paper, chewing gum, cigarette butt filter paper) and depended on the sample type. Importantly, deviating from the manufacturer's instructions for sample collection and pre-treatment was more detrimental to the ANDE 6C results. The quality of DNA profiles, as assessed using heterozygote peak height ratios, interloci balance and artifact presence, confirmed the results to be reliable and acceptable for single source samples. Profiling results were obtained when samples were reprocessed using the same Rapid DNA technology or conventional DNA analysis. Secondary analysis using a substitute software (GeneMapper ID-X v1.5) to recover additional genetic information was shown to be feasible. Finally, a comparison between the Applied Biosystems™ RapidHIT™ ID System Software v1.3.1 and v1.3.2 was also performed. Findings of this study could assist those interested in using Rapid DNA technology for blood or saliva-based samples, in various settings and for different applications.

Application of RapidHIT™ ID for cell authentication by fast and convenient STR profiling

BACKGROUND

As cell therapies are injected directly into the body, cell authentication is essential. Short tandem repeat (STR) profiling is used for human identification in forensics as well as for cell authentication. The standard methodology (DNA extraction, quantification, polymerase chain reaction, and capillary electrophoresis) takes at least 6 h and requires several instruments to obtain an STR profile. RapidHIT™ ID is a single automated instrument that provides an STR profile in 90 min.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to propose a method to use RapidHIT™ ID for cell authentication.

METHODS

Four types of cells which are used for cell therapy or in the production process were used. The sensitivity of STR profiling was compared by the cell type and cell count using RapidHIT™ ID. Moreover, the effect of preservation solutions, pre-treatment with cell lysis solution, proteinase K, Flinders Technology Associates (FTA) cards, and dried or wet cotton swabs (with a single cell type or a mixture of two) were examined. The results were compared to those obtained by the standard methodology using genetic analyzer ThermoFisher SeqStudio.

RESULTS

We accomplished a high sensitivity through our proposed method that can benefit cytology laboratories. Although the pre-treatment process affected the quality of the STR profile, other variables did not significantly affect STR profiling.

CONCLUSION

As a result of the experiment, RapidHIT™ ID can be used as a faster and simpler instrument for cell authentication.

Multi intercalators FRET enhanced detection of minute amounts of DNA

A novel approach is presented that increases sensitivity and specificity for detecting minimal traces of DNA in liquid and on solid samples. Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) from YOYO to Ethidium Bromide (EtBr) substantially increases the signal from DNA-bound EtBr highly enhancing sensitivity and specificity for DNA detection. The long fluorescence lifetime of the EtBr acceptor, when bound to DNA, allows for multi-pulse pumping with time gated (MPPTG) detection, which highly increases the detectable signal of DNA-bound EtBr. A straightforward spectra/image subtraction eliminates sample background and allows for a huge increase in the overall detection sensitivity. Using a combination of FRET and MPPTG detection an amount as small as 10 pg of DNA in a microliter sample can be detected without any additional sample purification/manipulation or use of amplification technologies. This amount of DNA is comparable to the DNA content of a one to two human cells. Such a detection method based on simple optics opens the potential for robust, highly sensitive DNA detection/imaging in the field, quick evaluation/sorting (i.e., triaging) of collected DNA samples, and can support various diagnostic assays.

A Systematic Review on Commercially Available Integrated Systems for Forensic DNA Analysis

This systematic review describes and discusses three commercially available integrated systems for forensic DNA analysis, i.e., ParaDNA, RapidHIT, and ANDE. A variety of aspects, such as performance, time-to-result, ease-of-use, portability, and costs (per analysis run) of these three (modified) rapid DNA analysis systems, are considered. Despite their advantages and developmental progress, major steps still have to be made before rapid systems can be broadly applied at crime scenes for full DNA profiling. Aspects in particular that need (further) improvement are portability, performance, the possibility to analyze a (wider) variety of (complex) forensic samples, and (cartridge) costs. Moreover, steps forward regarding ease-of-use and time-to-result will benefit the broader use of commercial rapid DNA systems. In fact, it would be a profit if rapid DNA systems could be used for full DNA profile generation as well as indicative analyses that can give direction to forensic investigators which will speed up investigations.

Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022

This review paper covers the forensic-relevant literature in biological sciences from 2019 to 2022 as a part of the 20th INTERPOL International Forensic Science Managers Symposium. Topics reviewed include rapid DNA testing, using law enforcement DNA databases plus investigative genetic genealogy DNA databases along with privacy/ethical issues, forensic biology and body fluid identification, DNA extraction and typing methods, mixture interpretation involving probabilistic genotyping software (PGS), DNA transfer and activity-level evaluations, next-generation sequencing (NGS), DNA phenotyping, lineage markers (Y-chromosome, mitochondrial DNA, X-chromosome), new markers and approaches (microhaplotypes, proteomics, and microbial DNA), kinship analysis and human identification with disaster victim identification (DVI), and non-human DNA testing including wildlife forensics. Available books and review articles are summarized as well as 70 guidance documents to assist in quality control that were published in the past three years by various groups within the United States and around the world.