Multiple sclerosis trial designs for the 21st century: building on recent lessons

Ponesimod Compared With Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in the Active-Comparator Phase 3 OPTIMUM Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

To our knowledge, the Oral Ponesimod Versus Teriflunomide In Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (OPTIMUM) trial is the first phase 3 study comparing 2 oral disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS).

Objective

To compare the efficacy of ponesimod, a selective sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) modulator with teriflunomide, a pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, approved for the treatment of patients with RMS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, double-blind, active-comparator, superiority randomized clinical trial enrolled patients from April 27, 2015, to May 16, 2019, who were aged 18 to 55 years and had been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis per 2010 McDonald criteria, with a relapsing course from the onset, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 0 to 5.5, and recent clinical or magnetic resonance imaging disease activity.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to 20 mg of ponesimod or 14 mg of teriflunomide once daily and the placebo for 108 weeks, with a 14-day gradual up-titration of ponesimod starting at 2 mg to mitigate first-dose cardiac effects of S1P1 modulators and a follow-up period of 30 days.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. The secondary end points were the changes in symptom domain of Fatigue Symptom and Impact Questionnaire-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (FSIQ-RMS) at week 108, the number of combined unique active lesions per year on magnetic resonance imaging, and time to 12-week and 24-week confirmed disability accumulation. Safety and tolerability were assessed. Exploratory end points included the percentage change in brain volume and no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3 and NEDA-4) status.

Results

For 1133 patients (567 receiving ponesimod and 566 receiving teriflunomide; median [range], 37.0 [18-55] years; 735 women [64.9%]), the relative rate reduction for ponesimod vs teriflunomide in the annualized relapse rate was 30.5% (0.202 vs 0.290; P < .001); the mean difference in FSIQ-RMS, -3.57 (-0.01 vs 3.56; P < .001); the relative risk reduction in combined unique active lesions per year, 56% (1.405 vs 3.164; P < .001); and the reduction in time to 12-week and 24-week confirmed disability accumulation risk estimates, 17% (10.1% vs 12.4%; P = .29) and 16% (8.1% vs 9.9; P = .37), respectively. Brain volume loss at week 108 was lower by 0.34% (-0.91% vs -1.25%; P < .001); the odds ratio for NEDA-3 achievement was 1.70 (25.0% vs 16.4%; P < .001). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (502 of 565 [88.8%] vs 499 of 566 [88.2%]) and serious treatment-emergent adverse events (49 [8.7%] vs 46 [8.1%]) was similar for both groups. Treatment discontinuations because of adverse events was more common in the ponesimod group (49 of 565 [8.7%] vs 34 of 566 [6.0%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, ponesimod was superior to teriflunomide on annualized relapse rate reduction, fatigue, magnetic resonance imaging activity, brain volume loss, and no evidence of disease activity status, but not confirmed disability accumulation. The safety profile was in line with the previous safety observations with ponesimod and the known profile of other S1P receptor modulators.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02425644.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantitatively review and summarize the effectiveness and safety of rituximab (RTX) treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched, and studies were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted with Stata. Primary outcomes included annualized relapse rate (ARR) change from baseline and relapse-free rate (RFR) at week 24, 48, 72, and 96. Secondary outcomes included Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change from baseline, the proportion of patients with infusion-related events (IRE) after treatment, and the proportion of patients with infections after treatment. Study quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included in this article and 13 of them were under quantitative synthesis. The 20 studies included 2020 patients suffering from RRMS. The overall absolute reduction in ARR of rituximab treatment in RRMS patients was 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.17). And the overall RFRs at week 24, 48, 72, and 96 were 90.4%, 88.5%, 86.4% and 86.2%, respectively. The estimated reduction in EDSS score was 0.62 (95% CI 0.20-1.04). The overall proportion of IRE and infections were 31% and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab can improve relapse and disability conditions in patients with RRMS and has the potential for RRMS treatment. Additional evaluations on the safety of RTX is required.

Natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: discontinuation, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and possible use in children

In the early 1990s, attention was drawn to the migration of immune cells into the central nervous system via the blood-brain barrier. The literature showed that lymphocytes binding to the endothelium were successfully inhibited by an antibody against α4β1 integrin. These biological findings resulted in the development of a humanized antibody to α4 integrin - natalizumab (NTZ) - to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of natalizumab, trying to answer the question whether its use may be recommended both in adult and in pediatric age groups as standard MS treatment. Our results highlight the improvement of clinical and radiological findings in treated patients (p < 0.005), confirming NTZ efficacy. Nevertheless, if NTZ is shown to be efficient, further studies should be performed to evaluate its safety and to target the MS profile that could benefit from this treatment.

Outcome measures in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: capturing disability and disease progression in clinical trials

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease that manifests as acute relapses and progressive disability. As a primary endpoint for clinical trials in MS, disability is difficult to both characterize and measure. Furthermore, the recovery from relapses and the rate of disability vary considerably among patients. Given these challenges, investigators have developed and studied the performance of various outcome measures and surrogate endpoints in MS clinical trials. This review defines the outcome measures and surrogate endpoints used to date in MS clinical trials and presents challenges in the design of both adult and pediatric trials.

Modeling MR imaging enhancing-lesion volumes in multiple sclerosis: application in clinical trials

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although the number of enhancing lesions is the typical outcome measure of choice in clinical trials in MS, a potentially more sensitive and statistically more powerful outcome measure is the volume of enhancing lesions. In this study, we assessed the distribution and statistical power of the volume of enhancing brain lesions as an outcome measure by means of their required sample size, and we compared the results with the number of enhancing lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

First, a literature search was performed to compare the effects of treatment on the number and volume of enhancing lesions. Then, a statistical model was proposed to describe the distribution of the volume of enhancing lesions in 2 datasets of patients with RRMS, and sample sizes for enhancing-lesion volume as primary outcome measure were calculated.

RESULTS

A mixture of the binomial and Weibull distribution was determined to model enhancing-lesion volumes in patients. Sample size calculations for enhancing-lesion volumes showed that approximately 94 patients per arm would be required to detect a combination of 20% decrease in lesion volume and 20% increase in patients without enhancing lesions, whereas calculations for enhancing-lesion counts showed that approximately 129 patients would be required to detect a 50% decrease.

CONCLUSIONS

The mixture of the binomial and Weibull distribution is a suitable approach in modeling new enhancing-lesion volumes in MS and yielded feasible sample size estimates for clinical trials, showing lesion volumes to be an advantageous outcome measure compared with lesion counts in terms of statistical power.

Safety and feasibility of autologous bone marrow cellular therapy in relapsing-progressive multiple sclerosis

In this phase I study, we assessed the safety and feasibility of intravenous, autologous bone marrow (BM) cell therapy, without immunosuppressive preconditioning, in six patients with clinically definite, relapsing-progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Assessment of efficacy was a secondary objective and employed clinical disability rating scales, multimodal evoked potential (MMEP) recordings, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Cells were harvested, filtered and infused intravenously in a day-case procedure that was well tolerated by patients and was not associated with any serious adverse events (AEs). Over a period of 12 months after the therapy, clinical disability scores showed either no change (Extended Disability Status Score, EDSS) or improvement (MS impact scale-29, MSIS-29), and MMEPs showed neurophysiological improvement. MRI scans did not show any significant changes over a post-therapy period of 3 months. The lack of serious adverse effects and the suggestion of a beneficial effect in this small sample of patients with progressive disease justify conducting a larger phase II/III study to make a fuller assessment of the efficacy of mobilization of autologous BM in patients with MS.

Clinically validated approaches to the treatment of autoimmune diseases

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Autoimmune diseases are pathological conditions in which "self-tolerance" has been broken, and an immune response has been mounted against the body's own tissues. More than seventy autoimmune diseases have been described, some of which are systemic and others of which are organ-specific. Although many of these diseases are rare, the collective prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the United States alone is between 5 and 8%, and is increasing.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Herein, we review the exciting advances made during the past decade (1999 - 2009) in the development of clinically-validated agents for the treatment of autoimmune disease. We focus on five of the most prevalent conditions: rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, Crohn's disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. The discussion is largely restricted to agents - both small molecules and macromolecules - that have advanced through randomized, controlled clinical trials.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

An overview of the pathogenesis of each disease is provided, along with a description of the therapies. Results from pivotal clinical trials are tabulated for four of the disease areas. We also provide summaries of experiences with both failed clinical trials and side effects observed during the course of clinical investigations. We conclude the review with thoughts on current challenges in the field and the prospect for future innovations.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

During the past decade, some of the largest advances in the treatment of autoimmune disease have arisen from highly potent and selective macromolecule-based therapies (e.g. antibodies, recombinant proteins and fusion proteins). Together, these clinical experiences have provided insight into the critical mechanisms in autoimmune pathogenesis, including inflammatory cytokine release, T-cell migration and co-stimulation, and B-cell function.

The distribution of new enhancing lesion counts in multiple sclerosis: further explorations

Background

A statistical distribution describing the number of new enhancing lesions seen on MRI in patients with MS is of great importance for improving the statistical methodology of clinical trials using new enhancing lesions as outcome measure. We examined whether there are superior alternatives for the currently proposed negative binomial (NB) distribution.

Objective

To determine the optimal statistical distribution describing new enhancing lesion counts from a selection of six conceivable models, and to assess the effect on the distribution of a treatment effect, varying follow-up duration and selection for activity at baseline.

Methods

The statistical NB, Poisson-Inverse Gaussian (P-IG), Poisson- Lognormal (P-LN), Neyman type A (NtA), Pólya-Aeppli (PA) and Zero Inflated Poisson (ZIP) distribution were fitted on new enhancing lesion data derived from one treated and two untreated cohorts of RRMS and relapsing SPMS patients and on subgroups of varying follow-up duration and selection for baseline activity. Measure of comparison was Akaike's information criterion (AIC).

Results

Both the subgroup analyses as well as a treatment had a noticeable effect on the distributional characteristics of new enhancing lesion counts. The NB distribution generally provided the most optimal fit, closely followed by the P-IG distribution and the P-LN distribution. Fits of the PA and NtA distribution were suboptimal, while the ZIP distribution was the least adequate for modelling new enhancing lesion counts.

Conclusion

The NB distribution is the optimal distribution for modelling new enhancing lesion counts, irrespective of the effect of treatment, follow-up duration or a baseline activity selection criterion.

Incorporating domain knowledge into the fuzzy connectedness framework: application to brain lesion volume estimation in multiple sclerosis

A method for incorporating prior knowledge into the fuzzy connectedness image segmentation framework is presented. This prior knowledge is in the form of probabilistic feature distribution and feature size maps, in a standard anatomical space, and "intensity hints" selected by the user that allow for a skewed distribution of the feature intensity characteristics. The fuzzy affinity between pixels is modified to encapsulate this domain knowledge. The method was tested by using it to segment brain lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis, and the results compared to an established method for lesion outlining based on edge detection and contour following. With the fuzzy connections (FC) method, the user is required to identify each lesion with a mouse click, to provide a set of seed pixels. The algorithm then grows the features from the seeds to define the lesions as a set of objects with fuzzy connectedness above a preset threshold. The FC method gave improved interobserver reproducibility of lesion volumes, and the set of pixels determined to be lesion was more consistent compared to the contouring method. The operator interaction time required to evaluate one subject was reduced from an average of 111 min with contouring to 16 min with the FC method.

FTY720 sustains and restores neuronal function in the DA rat model of MOG-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

FTY720 (fingolimod) is an oral sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator under development for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). To elucidate its effects in the central nervous system (CNS), we compared functional parameters of nerve conductance in the DA rat model of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) after preventive and therapeutic treatment. We demonstrate that prophylactic therapy protected against the emergence of EAE symptoms, neuropathology, and disturbances to visual and somatosensory evoked potentials (VEP, SEP). Moreover, therapeutic treatment from day 25 to 45 markedly reversed paralysis in established EAE and normalized the electrophysiological responses, correlating with decreased demyelination in the brain and spinal cord. The effectiveness of FTY720 in this model is likely due to several contributing factors. Evidence thus far supports its role in the reduction of inflammation and preservation of blood-brain-barrier integrity. FTY720 may also act via S1P receptors in glial cells to promote endogenous repair mechanisms that complement its immunomodulatory action.

Antigen-specific therapy promotes repair of myelin and axonal damage in established EAE

Inflammation results in CNS damage in multiple sclerosis (MS) and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of MS. It is uncertain how much repair of injured myelin and axons can occur following highly selective anti-inflammatory therapy in EAE and MS. In this study, SJL/J mice with established EAE were treated successfully with an antigen-specific recombinant T cell receptor ligand (RTL), RTL401, a mouse I-A(s)/PLP-139-151 construct, after the peak of EAE. To define the mechanisms by which late application of RTL401 inhibits EAE, we evaluated mice at different time points to assess the levels of neuroinflammation and myelin and axon damage in their spinal cords. Our results showed that RTL401 administered after the peak of acute EAE induced a marked reduction in inflammation in the CNS, associated with a significant reduction of demyelination, axonal loss and ongoing damage. Electron microscopy showed that RTL-treated mice had reduced pathology compared with mice treated with vehicle and mice at the peak of disease, as demonstrated by a decrease in continued degeneration, increase in remyelinating axons and the presence of an increased number of small, presumably regenerative axonal sprouts. These findings indicate that RTL therapy targeting encephalitogenic T cells may promote CNS neuroregenerative processes.

Antigen presentation in autoimmunity and CNS inflammation: how T lymphocytes recognize the brain

The central nervous system (CNS) is traditionally viewed as an immune privileged site in which overzealous immune cells are prevented from doing irreparable damage. It was believed that immune responses occurring within the CNS could potentially do more damage than the initial pathogenic insult itself. However, virtually every aspect of CNS tissue damage, including degeneration, tumors, infection, and of course autoimmunity, involves a significant cellular inflammatory component. While the blood-brain barrier (BBB) inhibits diffusion of hydrophilic (immune) molecules across brain capillaries, activated lymphocytes readily pass the endothelial layer of postcapillary venules without difficulty. In classic neuro-immune diseases such as multiple sclerosis or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, it is thought that neuroantigen-reactive lymphocytes, which have escaped immune tolerance, now invade the CNS and are responsible for tissue damage, demyelination, and axonal degeneration. The developed animal model for these disorders, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), reflects many aspects of the human conditions. Studies in EAE proved that auto-reactive encephalitogenic T helper (Th) cells are responsible for the onset of the disease. Th cells recognize their cognate antigen (Ag) only when presented by professional Ag-presenting cells in the context of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. The apparent target structures of EAE immunity are myelinating oligodendrocytes, which are not capable of presenting Ag to invading encephalitogenic T cells. A compulsory third party is thus required to mediate between the attacking T cells and the myelin-expressing target. This review will discuss the recent advances in this field of research and we will discuss the journey of an auto-reactive T cell from its site of activation into perivascular spaces and further into the target tissue.