Distinguishing Susac’s syndrome from multiple sclerosis

The neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations of Susac syndrome: a brief review of the literature and future directions

Encephalopathy is part of the clinical triad of Susac syndrome, but a detailed understanding of the neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric profile of this condition is lacking. Existing literature indicates that cognitive deficits range in severity from subtle to profound. Executive function and short-term recall are affected frequently. Psychiatric manifestations may be absent or may include anxiety, mood disorders or psychosis. If psychiatric phenomena develop during the disease course, it can be hard to disentangle whether symptoms directly relate to the pathology of Susac syndrome or are secondary to treatment-related side effects. In this article, we review what is known about the cognitive and psychiatric morbidity of Susac syndrome and identify areas where knowledge is deficient. Importantly, we also provide a framework for future research, arguing that better phenotyping, understanding of pathophysiology, evaluation of treatments on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes, and longitudinal data capture are vital to improving patient outcomes.

Diagnostic MRI Score to Differentiate Susac Syndrome from Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System and Multiple Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Susac syndrome (SuS), multiple sclerosis (MS), and primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) present diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical features. We aimed to enhance diagnostic precision by developing the SPAMS (SuS, PACNS, MS) score, a practical radiological tool.

METHODS

This multicenter study included 99 patients (43 SuS, 37 MS, 19 PACNS) from South American countries. Relevant MRI features were identified through an elastic-net model determined key variables.

RESULTS

The SPAMS score assigned 2 points for snowball lesions, 1 point for spokes-like lesions, or if there are more than 4 lesions in the corpus callosum, corpus callosum involvement, or cerebellar involvement. It subtracted 1 point if gadolinium-enhancing lesions or 4 points if Dawson's fingers are present. Bootstrapping validated the optimal cutoff at 2 points, exhibiting a diagnostic performance of area under the curve = 0.931, sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 89%, positive predictive value = 88%, negative predictive value = 89%, and accuracy = 88%.

INTERPRETATION

When specific MRI findings coexisted, the SPAMS score differentiated SuS from MS and PACNS. Access to MRI and standard protocol sequences makes it a valuable tool for timely diagnosis and treatment, potentially preventing disability progression and severe clinical outcomes. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:846-854.

Susac's Syndrome: A Tale of Disability Due to Late Recognition

Susac's syndrome is a rare inflammatory microangiopathy characterized by the triad of retinopathy, encephalopathy, and hearing loss. The syndrome causes recurrent microinfarcts in these organs, which in turn manifests with repeated attacks of visual field loss, hearing loss and tinnitus, and various brain syndromes. These often lead to the significant accumulation of disability over time, particularly if there is a delay or failure in diagnosis. The brain lesions associated with this condition may resemble those of multiple sclerosis, especially to those who are unfamiliar with the disease and its distinctive clinical and radiological features. Such misdiagnosis may have grave clinical consequences. Here, we present the case of a 41-year-old Danish man who presented with the classical triad of Susac's syndrome but was misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis. It took three years from disease onset before the eventual diagnosis was recognized, and by this time, he had accrued a lot of neurological deficits. With this case report, we aim to draw awareness to this rare but unforgiving entity which if missed can lead to the accumulation of disabilities. We also aim to emphasize the features that help distinguish it from multiple sclerosis, the condition with which it is most often confused.

Misdiagnosis of Susac syndrome as demyelinating disease and primary angiitis of the central nervous system: A case report

Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare neuroinflammatory disease that manifests with a triad of hearing loss, branch retinal artery occlusions, and encephalopathy. Patients with SuS are frequently misdiagnosed because the clinical trial is incompletely present at disease onset. In this report, we present a case of a 29-year-old man manifesting sleepiness, epilepsy, urinary dysfunction, and hemiparesis at the initial stage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed multiple abnormal signals located in the lateral paraventricular, corpus callosal, and pons. In addition, the patient had sustained elevation of CSF pressure and protein. ADEM was considered according to the clinical and radiographic findings. However, symptoms were not significantly improved after methylprednisolone therapy. He showed a vision decline in the third month after the disease onset. It was considered from intracranial hypertension or optic neuritis, and therefore retinal arteriolar impairment was ignored. As the disease progresses, cognitive decline was presented. Brain MRI exhibits multiple significant hyperintensities on the DWI sequence with speck-like gadolinium enhancement. Thus, PACNS was diagnosed. The SuS was not made until the presence of hearing decline in the 4 months after the disease onset. The case will be helpful for clinicians to better recognize the atypical initial manifestation of SuS.

Susac syndrome: A scoping review

Susac syndrome is a rare disease characterized by an inflammatory microangiopathy limited to the brain, eye, and ear vessels. It mainly affects young women. Although the pathophysiology is not fully elucidated, recent advances favour a primitive vasculitis affecting the cerebral, retinal and cochlear small vessels. Diagnosis relies on the recognition of the triad including: 1/subacute encephalopathy with unusual headache and pseudo-psychiatric features associated with multifocal ischemic white matter, grey matter nuclei and specifically corpus callosum lesions along with leptomeningeal enhancement on brain MRI, 2/ophthalmological involvement that may be pauci-symptomatic, with bilateral occlusions of the branches of the central artery of the retina at fundoscopy and arterial wall hyperfluorescence on fluorescein angiography, 3/cochleo-vestibular damage with neurosensorial hearing loss predominating on low frequencies. The full triad may not be present at diagnosis but should be sought repeatedly. Relapses are frequent during an active period lasting approximately 2 years. Eventually, the disease resolves but isolated retinal arterial wall hyperfluorescence without new occlusions may recur, which should not result in treatment intensification. First-line treatment mostly consists of high dose corticosteroids. In refractory patients or in case of relapse, immunomodulatory molecules such as intravenous immunoglobulins or immunosuppressive drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide or rituximab should be started. Sequelae -mostly hearing loss and cognitive impairment- are usually mild but remain frequent in these young patients.

Diagnosis, differential diagnosis and misdiagnosis of Susac syndrome

Background and purpose

Susac syndrome (SuS) is an inflammatory condition of the brain, eye and ear. Diagnosis can be challenging, and misdiagnosis is common.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of the medical records of 32 adult patients from an Australasian cohort of SuS patients.

Results

An alternative diagnosis prior to SuS was made in 30 patients (94%) with seven patients receiving two or more diagnoses. The median time to diagnosis of SuS was 3 months (range 0.5–100 months). The commonest misdiagnoses were migraine in 10 patients (31%), cerebral vasculitis in six (19%), multiple sclerosis in five (16%) and stroke in five (16%). Twenty‐two patients were treated for alternative diagnoses, 10 of whom had further clinical manifestations prior to SuS diagnosis. At presentation seven patients (22%) met criteria for definite SuS, 19 (59%) for probable SuS and six (19%) for possible SuS. Six patients (19%) presented with brain–eye–ear involvement, 14 with brain–ear (44%), six with brain–eye (19%) and six (19%) with only brain involvement. In patients with the complete triad of symptoms the median delay to diagnosis was 3 months (range 1–9 months) compared to 5.25 months (range 0.5–100 months) for patients with encephalopathy and ocular symptoms at presentation.

Conclusions

Susac syndrome patients are frequently misdiagnosed at initial presentation, despite many having symptoms or radiological features that are red flags for the diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can lead to patient morbidity. The varied ways in which SuS can present, and clinician failure to consider or recognize SuS, appear to be the main factors leading to misdiagnosis.

Susac syndrome with a unique involvement of the thoracic spinal cord

A woman in her late 20s presented with headaches and subacute encephalopathy. MRIs showed multiple punctate subcortical and periventricular white matter hyperintensities with diffusion restriction, infratentorial lesions, leptomeningeal enhancement of the cervical spinal cord, brainstem and cerebellum and two areas of high-signal abnormality at T4 and T6 raising suspicion for multiple sclerosis or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.Further studies and evolution of her symptoms during her hospital stay confirmed the clinical triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusions and hearing loss pathognomonic for Susac's syndrome.While cervical spinal cord and cauda equina involvement have been reported in Susac's syndrome previously, no thoracic spinal cord involvement has been reported.We report the novel MRI finding of thoracic spinal cord involvement in Susac's syndrome. In order to avoid misdiagnosis, neurologists and neuroradiologists should be aware that any part of the spinal cord can be involved in Susac's syndrome.

Quantitative MRI findings indicate diffuse white matter damage in Susac Syndrome

Background

Susac Syndrome (SuS) is an autoimmune endotheliopathy impacting the brain, retina and cochlea that can clinically mimic multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objective

To evaluate non-lesional white matter demyelination changes in SuS compared to MS and healthy controls (HC) using quantitative MRI.

Methods

3T MRI including myelin water imaging and diffusion basis spectrum imaging were acquired for 7 SuS, 10 MS and 10 HC participants. Non-lesional white matter was analyzed in the corpus callosum (CC) and normal appearing white matter (NAWM). Groups were compared using ANCOVA with Tukey correction.

Results

SuS CC myelin water fraction (mean 0.092) was lower than MS(0.11, p = 0.01) and HC(0.11, p = 0.04). Another myelin marker, radial diffusivity, was increased in SuS CC(0.27μm2/ms) compared to HC(0.21μm2/ms, p = 0.008) and MS(0.23μm2/ms, p = 0.05). Fractional anisotropy was lower in SuS CC(0.82) than HC(0.86, p = 0.04). Fiber fraction (reflecting axons) did not differ from HC or MS. In NAWM, radial diffusivity and apparent diffusion coefficient were significantly increased in SuS compared to HC(p < 0.001 for both measures) and MS(p = 0.003, p < 0.001 respectively).

Conclusions

Our results provided evidence of myelin damage in SuS, particularly in the CC, and more extensive microstructural injury in NAWM, supporting the hypothesis that there are widespread microstructural changes in SuS syndrome including diffuse demyelination.

Manifestation of Susac syndrome during interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate treatment for misdiagnosed multiple sclerosis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Susac syndrome (SS) is characterized by the triad of encephalopathy, branch retinal artery occlusion, and sensorineural hearing loss. However, the diagnosis of SS remains difficult because the clinical triad rarely occurs at disease onset, and symptom severity varies. SS symptoms often suggest other diseases, in particular multiple sclerosis (MS), which is more common. Misdiagnosing SS as MS may cause serious complications because MS drugs, such as interferon beta-1a, can worsen the course of SS. This case report confirms previous reports that the use of interferon beta-1a in the course of misdiagnosed MS may lead to exacerbation of SS. Moreover, our case report shows that glatiramer acetate may also exacerbate the course of SS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of exacerbation of SS by glatiramer acetate.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case report of a patient with a primary diagnosis of MS who developed symptoms of SS during interferon beta-1a treatment for MS; these symptoms were resolved after the discontinuation of the treatment. Upon initiation of glatiramer acetate treatment, the patient developed the full clinical triad of SS. The diagnosis of MS was excluded, and glatiramer acetate therapy was discontinued. The patient's neurological state improved only after the use of a combination of corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, and azathioprine.

CONCLUSIONS

The coincidence of SS signs and symptoms with treatment for MS, first with interferon beta-1a and then with glatiramer acetate, suggests that these drugs may influence the course of SS. This case report indicates that treatment with glatiramer acetate may modulate or even exacerbate the course of SS.

Successful Treatment of Incomplete Susac Syndrome with Simultaneous Corticosteroids and Plasmapheresis Followed by Rituximab

We present a case report of a patient with incomplete Susac syndrome. He had cognitive impairment, corpus callosum lesions, and vestibulocochlear dysfunction on brainstem auditory evoked responses. He was treated with methylprednisolone and plasmapheresis, improved, and then, also received rituximab. His improvement has been lasting as of this writing. This case shares our experience with a successful treatment of this rare condition that is incompletely understood and lacks well-established treatment guidelines.

Sudden onset hearing loss as initial presentation of Susac syndrome: a rare case report and brief review

Susac syndrome is a rare disease presenting with a classic triad of symptoms. These are sensorineural hearing loss, encephalopathy, and branch retinal artery occlusions. Initial presentation is usually headache and symptoms of encephalopathy. Hearing loss is unusual in the early stages but, when it does present, can often lead to a misdiagnosis of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Hence, neurological and retinal examinations are essential to an accurate diagnosis. In this study, we aimed to raise awareness of Susac syndrome among physicians and facilitate recognition of its manifestation, especially in those patients presenting with hearing loss alone. Identifying Susac syndrome that presents as sudden sensorineural hearing loss can be challenging but a number of case reviews have been reported in recent years and treatment guidelines are available.

Susac Syndrome and Pregnancy

Susac syndrome (SuS) is a rare poorly characterised disorder that affects the brain, retina, and cochlea. Here, we present a case of a 31-year-old pregnant female with a new diagnosis of SuS that was successfully managed to 36 weeks of gestation with minimal disease burden to both the mother and newborn. She was treated initially using intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). We stress the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving both neurology and maternal-fetal medicine, and provide guidance in navigating the various options for immunosuppressive therapy during pregnancy.

Susac syndrome (Retino-cochleo-cerebral vasculitis), the ophthalmologist in the role of the whistleblower

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Susac syndrome is a rare microangiopathy of suspected autoimmune origin affecting arteries of the retina, the cochlea and the brain. The aim of the study was to give a review of the disease entity and determine the proportion of cases and their characteristics in a uveitis referral centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Charts of patients with the diagnosis of Susac syndrome seen in the Uveitis Clinic of the Centre for Ophthalmic Specialised Care (COS), Lausanne, Switzerland were reviewed retrospectively to determine the frequency of such cases in a uveitis referral centre. Clinical symptoms and signs, functional data, imaging signs and evolution were analysed in the 3 COS cases and one case shared with the Uveitis Clinic of the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Innsbruck, Austria. Characteristic signs were searched possibly allowing a prompt diagnosis.

RESULTS

During the period from 1994 to 2019 (24 years, 2045 patients), 3 charts with the diagnosis of Susac syndrome were found (0.15%). The whole collective, including the additional case, comprised three women aged 28, 32 and 63 at presentation and one man, aged 42. None of the 3 cases that were referred were diagnosed beforehand. The characteristic item found in all 4 cases was the abrupt arterial stop or segmental interruption of arteries and increased staining of arterial wall on angiography more clearly shown on indocyanine green angiography that can potentially be proposed as a crucial diagnostic element. All 4 cases responded to dual steroidal and non-steroidal immunosuppression. Under treatment, all four patients did not show any further evolution.

CONCLUSION

Susac syndrome is a multilocation arteritis of the head that can involve the eye, ear and brain often first diagnosed by the ophthalmologist. The diagnosis is rapidly reached in uveitis referral centres but seems to be missed otherwise, A helpful angiographic sign to be searched is an abrupt or segmental arterial stop and increased staining of the arterial wall more clearly seen on indocyanine green angiography. Patients often present first to the ophthalmologist who should be acting as a whistleblower to avoid severe involvement of the brain.

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment Algorithm for Susac Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Susac syndrome (SS) classically presents with the clinical triad of retinal artery occlusion, sensorineural hearing loss, and encephalopathy and the neuroimaging triad of white matter lesions, deep gray matter lesions, and leptomeningeal disease. However, patients can present with an incomplete clinical or neuroimaging triads making diagnosis difficult in certain situations. A standard treatment paradigm also is lacking in this illness. It is important for neuro-ophthalmologists to recognize clinical and radiographic findings that are pathognomonic for this syndrome and have a basic understanding of the available treatment options.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Review of medical literature.

RESULTS

A definite diagnosis of SS is made when the clinical triad or the neuroimaging triad is present. There are numerous reports of 2 other imaging findings in this condition: arteriolar wall hyperfluorescence (AWH) on fluorescein angiography in retinal arterioles remote from retinal ischemia and central callosal lesions on MRI. Both of these imaging findings are diagnostic of SS. Gass plaques in retinal arterioles are almost always seen in the acute phase of the illness but are not pathognomonic for SS. The most common medications used in this syndrome are corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. A number of other medications have been used including mycopheolate, rituximab, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of the clinical triad or magnetic resonance imaging triad for SS, AWH remote from retinal vascular injury and central callosal lesions are confirmatory of the diagnosis because they have never been described in any other condition. The presence of Gass plaques in retinal arterioles should strongly suggest the diagnosis. Despite the lack of clinical trial data, patients with SS must be treated promptly and aggressively. In more fulminant cases, addition of mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab is required, followed by cyclophosphamide when disease is refractory to other medications.

What Can Mimic Multiple Sclerosis?

This article discusses mimics of multiple sclerosis (MS). Excluded in this discussion are neuromyelitis optica and vasculitis, discussed in other articles in this journal. Covered entities include posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, reversible vasoconstriction syndrome, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Sussac's Syndrome, and chronic idiopathic demyelinating polyneuropathy. There are also multiple infectious entities that mimic MS including; progressive multi-focal leukoencephalopathy (PML), Toxoplasmosis, Tuberculosis, Herpes Simplex Virus, Cytomegalovirus, Varicella zoster virus, Epstein Barr virus, Cryptococcus and Human immunodeficiency virus. In addition, there are leukoencephalopathies that can present in adulthood including Adrenoleukodystrophy, Metachromatic leukodystrophy, Cerebral autosomal dominant idiopathic leukoencephalopathy, Leigh's and Alexanders disease that could be mistaken for MS.

The spectrum of immune-mediated and inflammatory lesions of the brainstem: Clues to diagnosis

The presentation of a patient with brainstem symptoms and signs invokes a number of common and less common differential diagnoses, and accurate diagnosis can be challenging. We review the major immune-mediated and inflammatory syndromes that can affect the brainstem including multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, neuro-Behçet disease, chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids, neurosarcoidosis, Susac syndrome, and the histiocytic disorders. We focus on clinical features and MRI clues that help to distinguish among the different brainstem conditions. Accurate diagnosis is important to guide appropriate treatment and limit neurologic disability.

Progressive sensorineural hearing loss many years preceding completion of Susac's syndrome triad: A case report

Susac's syndrome (SuS) is a rare disorder with a clinical triad of encephalopathy, sensorineural hearing loss, and branch retinal artery occlusions. We report a 7-year-old girl who presented with chronic, progressive sensorineural hearing loss, who, years later, presented with encephalopathy and vision loss. Such prolonged period between symptoms is unusual and to our knowledge, this is the longest interval between onset of hearing loss and completion of the full triad in SuS. In addition, she had a protracted disease course, requiring multiple immune therapies for disease control.

Immune-mediated conditions affecting the brain, eye and ear (BEE syndromes)

The triad of central nervous system symptoms, visual disturbance and hearing impairment is an oft-encountered clinical scenario. A number of immune-mediated diseases should be considered among the differential diagnoses including: Susac syndrome, Cogan syndrome or Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease; demyelinating conditions such as multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; systemic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome or Behcet disease and granulomatous diseases such as sarcoidosis. In this article, we coin the term 'BEE syndromes' to draw attention to the various immune-mediated diseases that affect the brain, eye and ear. We present common disease manifestations and identify key clinical and investigation features.

Diagnosis and Prediction of Relapses in Susac Syndrome: A New Use for MR Postcontrast FLAIR Leptomeningeal Enhancement

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Leptomeningeal enhancement can be found in a variety of neurologic diseases such as Susac Syndrome. Our aim was to assess its prevalence and significance of leptomeningeal enhancement in Susac syndrome using 3T postcontrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2017, nine consecutive patients with Susac syndrome and a control group of 73 patients with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome were included. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the clinical and ophthalmologic data independently reviewed MRIs and assessed leptomeningeal enhancement and parenchymal abnormalities. Follow-up MRIs (5.9 MRIs is the mean number per patient over a median period of 46 months) of patients with Susac syndrome were reviewed and compared with clinical and retinal fluorescein angiographic data evaluated by an independent ophthalmologist. Fisher tests were used to compare the 2 groups, and mixed-effects logistic models were used for analysis of clinical and imaging follow-up of patients with Susac syndrome.

RESULTS

Patients with Susac syndrome were significantly more likely to present with leptomeningeal enhancement: 5/9 (56%) versus 6/73 (8%) in the control group (P = .002). They had a significantly higher leptomeningeal enhancement burden with ≥3 lesions in 5/9 patients versus 0/73 (P < .001). Regions of leptomeningeal enhancement were significantly more likely to be located in the posterior fossa: 5/9 versus 0/73 (P < .001). Interobserver agreement for leptomeningeal enhancement was good (κ = 0.79). There was a significant association between clinical relapses and increase of both leptomeningeal enhancement and parenchymal lesion load: OR = 6.15 (P = .01) and OR = 5 (P = .02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Leptomeningeal enhancement occurs frequently in Susac syndrome and could be helpful for diagnosis and in predicting clinical relapse.

Neuroimaging of Pediatric Arteriopathies

Pediatric arteriopathies are increasingly recognized in school-aged children with a variety of presenting symptoms ranging from headache, seizures, encephalopathy, and neuropsychiatric symptoms as well as focal neurologic deficits due to acute ischemic strokes. However, unlike the adult stroke population, there are differences in the clinical manifestations, the stroke mechanism, and risk factors in pediatric ischemic stroke. There has been increasing awareness and recognition of pediatric cerebral arteriopathies as a predominant stroke etiology. Prompt diagnosis of arteriopathies is essential to limit injury and prevent recurrent stroke. Based on predominant vessels involved and clinical symptoms, these arteriopathies can be broadly divided into two categories: large-medium size arteriopathies and small vessel arteriopathies. Each category can be further divided into inflammatory and noninflammatory according to their etiologies. The ability to distinguish between inflammatory and noninflammatory etiologies carries major prognostic implications for acute management and secondary stroke prevention as well as screening for systemic complications and counseling.

Infectious encephalitis: mimics and chameleons

Click here to listen to the Podcast 'Query encephalitis' is a common neurological consultation in hospitalised patients. Identifying the syndrome is only part of the puzzle. Although historically encephalitis has been almost synonymous with infection, we increasingly recognise parainfectious or postinfectious as well as other immune-mediated causes. We must also distinguish encephalitis from other causes of encephalopathy, including systemic infection, metabolic derangements, toxins, inherited metabolic disorders, hypoxia, trauma and vasculopathies. Here, we review the most important differential diagnoses (mimics) of patients presenting with an encephalitic syndrome and highlight some unusual presentations (chameleons) of infectious encephalitis.