Functional impairment in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 can be assessed by an ataxia rating scale (SARA)

Analysis of human urinary extracellular vesicles reveals disordered renal metabolism in myotonic dystrophy type 1

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the genetic disorder myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) each are associated with progressive muscle wasting, whole-body insulin resistance, and impaired systemic metabolism. However, CKD is undocumented in DM1 and the molecular pathogenesis driving DM1 is unknown to involve the kidney. Here we use urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs), RNA sequencing, droplet digital PCR, and predictive modeling to identify downregulation of metabolism transcripts Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase-1, 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase, Dihydropyrimidinase, Glutathione S-transferase alpha-1, Aminoacylase-1, and Electron transfer flavoprotein B in DM1. Expression of these genes localizes to the kidney, especially the proximal tubule, and correlates with muscle strength and function. In DM1 autopsy kidney tissue, characteristic ribonuclear inclusions are evident throughout the nephron. We show that urinary organic acids and acylglycines are elevated in DM1, and correspond to enzyme deficits of downregulated genes. Our study identifies a previously unrecognized site of DM1 molecular pathogenesis and highlights the potential of urinary EVs as biomarkers of renal and metabolic disturbance in these individuals.

Outcome measures frequently used to assess muscle strength in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1: a systematic review

Measurement of muscle strength is fundamental for the management of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Nevertheless, guidance on this topic is somewhat limited due to heterogeneous outcome measures used. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize the most frequent outcome measures to assess muscle strength in patients with DM1. We searched on Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase databases. Observational studies using measures of muscle strength assessment in adult patients with DM1 were included. From a total of 80 included studies, 24 measured cardiac, 45 skeletal and 23 respiratory muscle strength. The most common method and outcome measures used to assess cardiac muscle strength were echocardiography and ejection fraction, for skeletal muscle strength were quantitative muscle test, manual muscle test and maximum isometric torque and medical research council and for respiratory muscle strength were manometry and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure. We successfully gathered the more consensual methods and measures to evaluate muscle strength in future clinical studies, particularly to test muscle strength response to treatments in patients with DM1. Future consensus on a set of measures to evaluate muscle strength (core outcome set), is important for these patients.

How to capture activities of daily living in myotonic dystrophy type 2?

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) lacks validated patients´ reported outcomes (PROs). This represents a limit for monitoring disease progression and perceived efficacy of symptomatic treatments. Our aim was to investigate whether PROs for activities of daily living designed for other neuromuscular diseases could be used in DM2. Sixty-six DM2 patients completed the following PROs: DM1-Activ-c, Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity (R-PAct) scale, McGill-pain questionnaire, fatigue and daytime sleepiness scale and Beck depression inventory (BDI-II). Clinical data and motor outcome measures (6-minutes walking test - 6MWT, manual muscle testing, quick motor function test and myotonia behavior scale) were collected as well. Patients underwent one visit at baseline and one after 10 months. Ceiling/flooring effects, criterion validity and discriminant validity were calculated. DM1-activ-c and R-PAct showed acceptable ceiling effects despite being built for myotonic dystrophy type 1 and Pompe disease, respectively. The difficulty hierarchy of the single items was better preserved in R-PAct than in DM1-Activ-c. Both tests showed excellent criterion validity highly correlating with 6MWT, quick motor function test, myalgia and disease duration. They could partially discriminate patients with different disability grades. These results suggest that DM1-Activ-c, slightly better than R-PAct, might be adopted for monitoring activities of daily living also in DM2, at least until disease-specific PROs will be available.

Activities of daily living in myotonic dystrophy type 1

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this cross-sectional, observational study was to investigate performance of activities of daily living in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults with genetically confirmed DM1 were recruited from Newcastle University (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK) and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK). Data on activities of daily living were recorded through the DM1-ActivC (scale scores range between 0 and 100, where a higher/lower score indicates a higher/lower ability).

RESULTS

Our sample comprised 192 patients with DM1 (mean age: 46 years; 51% female). Patients reported most difficulties with running, carrying and putting down heavy objects, and standing on one leg, and least difficulties with eating soup, washing upper body, and taking a shower. Irrespective of the disease duration (mean: 20 years), most patients were able to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living (eg personal hygiene and grooming, showering, eating, cleaning and shopping), with the exception of functional mobility/transfer tasks (eg walking uphill and running). The mean DM1-ActivC total score was estimated at 71 (95% CI: 68-74). Estimated progenitor cytosine-thymine-guanine repeat length and age explained 27% of the variance in DM1-ActivC total scores (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We show that DM1 impairs performance of activities of daily living, in particular those requiring a high degree of muscle strength, stability and coordination. Yet, across the evolution of the disease, the majority of patients will still be able to independently perform most basic and instrumental activities of daily living.

Validation of Motor Outcome Measures in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Introduction: Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) lacks disease-specific, validated, motor outcome measures (OMs), and patients' reported outcomes (PROs). This represents a limit for the monitoring of disease progression and treatment response. Our aim was to identify the most appropriate OMs to be translated in clinical practice and clinical trials on DM2. This study has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT03603171 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03603171). Methods: Sixty-six patients with genetically confirmed DM2 underwent a baseline and a follow-up visit after 1 year. The tested OMs included: hand opening time, pressure pain threshold (PPT), manual muscle testing (MMT), hand held dynamometry (HHD), scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), quantitative motor function test (QMFT), gait stairs Gowers chair (GSGC), 30-s sit to stand test, functional index 2 (FI-2) and 6MWT. The PROs included DM1-Active-C, Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity scale (R-Pact), fatigue and daytime sleepiness (FDSS), brief pain inventory short form (BPI-sf), myotonia behavior scale (MBS), and the McGill pain questionnaire. Results: All patients completed the MBS and the results correlated well with the hand-opening time. The PPT showed a low reliability, no correlation with pain questionnaires, and did not differentiate patients with or without myalgia. Both muscle strength assessments, MMT and HHD, showed good construct validity. The QMFT showed an acceptable ceiling effect (14.5%), good convergent and differential validity and performed overall better than GSGC. The SARA score showed high flooring effect and is not useful in DM2. 6MWT proved a valid outcome measure in DM2. The 30-s sit to stand is a feasible test with good convergent validity, showing a flooring effect of 20% as it cannot be used in more severely affected patients. The FI-2 is time-consuming and has a high ceiling effect. At the 1-year visit the only assessments able to detect a worsening of DM2 were HHD, QMFT, and 6MWT, which are the most sensitive to change, and therefore clinically meaningful OMs in DM2. Conclusion: The clinical meaningful motor outcome measures that best depict the multifaceted phenotype of DM2 and its slow progression are MBS, MMT, or HHD (depending on the clinical setting), QMFT, and the 6MWT.

Paving the way for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of gait impairment in myotonic dystrophy: a pilot study focusing on muscle networks

BACKGROUND

A proper rehabilitation program targeting gait is mandatory to maintain the quality of life of patients with Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). Assuming that gait and balance impairment simply depend on the degree of muscle weakness is potentially misleading. In fact, the involvement of the Central Nervous System (CNS) in DM1 pathophysiology calls into account the deterioration of muscle coordination in gait impairment. Our study aimed at demonstrating the presence and role of muscle connectivity deterioration in patients with DM1 by a CNS perspective by investigating signal synergies using a time-frequency spectral coherence and multivariate analyses on lower limb muscles while walking upright. Further, we sought at determining whether muscle networks were abnormal secondarily to the muscle impairment or primarily to CNS damage (as DM1 is a multi-system disorder also involving the CNS). In other words, muscle network deterioration may depend on a weakening in signal synergies (that express the neural drive to muscles deduced from surface electromyography data).

METHODS

Such an innovative approach to estimate muscle networks and signal synergies was carried out in seven patients with DM1 and ten healthy controls (HC).

RESULTS

Patients with DM1 showed a commingling of low and high frequencies among muscle at both within- and between-limbs level, a weak direct neural coupling concerning inter-limb coordination, a modest network segregation, high integrative network properties, and an impoverishment in the available signal synergies, as compared to HCs. These network abnormalities were independent from muscle weakness and myotonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that gait impairment in patients with DM1 depends also on a muscle network deterioration that is secondary to signal synergy deterioration (related to CNS impairment). This suggests that muscle network deterioration may be a primary trait of DM1 rather than a maladaptive mechanism to muscle degeneration. This information may be useful concerning the implementation of proper rehabilitative strategies in patients with DM1. It will be indeed necessary not only addressing muscle weakness but also gait-related muscle connectivity to improve functional ambulation in such patients.

Analysis of the functional capacity outcome measures for myotonic dystrophy

Objectives

Defining clinically relevant outcome measures for myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) that can be valid and feasible for different phenotypes has proven problematic. The Outcome Measures for Myotonic Dystrophy (OMMYD) group proposed a battery of functional outcomes: 6‐minute walk test, 30 seconds sit and stand test, timed 10 m walk test, timed 10 m walk/run test, and nine‐hole peg test. This, however, required a large‐scale investigation,

Methods

A cohort of 213 patients enrolled in the natural history study, PhenoDM1, was analyzed in cross‐sectional analysis and subsequently 98 patients were followed for longitudinal analysis. We aimed to assess: (1) feasibility and best practice; (2) intra‐session reliability; (3) validity; and (4) behavior over time, of these tests.

Results

OMMYD outcomes proved feasible as 96% of the participants completed at least one trial for all tests and more than half (n = 113) performed all three trials of each test. Body mass index and disease severity associate with functional capacity. There was a significant difference between the first and second trials of each test. There was a moderate to strong correlation between these functional outcomes and muscle strength, disease severity and patient‐reported outcomes. All outcomes after 1 year detected a change in functional capacity except the nine‐hole peg test.

Conclusions

These tests can be used as a battery of outcomes or independently based on the shown overlapping psychometric features and strong cross‐correlations. Due to the large and heterogeneous sample of this study, these results can serve as reference values for future studies.

Relationships between Lower Limb Muscle Strength Impairments and Physical Limitations in DM1

BACKGROUND

Although adult and late-onset DM1 phenotypes DM1 present distinct lower limb weaknesses portraits, resulting physical limitations have never been described separately for each phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the lower limb weaknesses and physical limitations among the DM1 adult and late-onset phenotypes separately and to document the contribution of weaknesses on mobility to optimize the management of this population.

METHODS

The strength of four muscle groups among 198 participants was quantified. Participants were categorized according to the severity of their muscular involvement using the Muscular Impairment Rating Scale (MIRS). Physical limitations were assessed using the Timed up-and-go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and 10 meters comfortable walking speed (10MWT). Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify the contribution of each muscle group to the mobility tests scores.

RESULTS

Late-onset demonstrated less weakness and physical limitations (p < 0.001 - 0.002) than the adult phenotype, but 21.9-47.5% of participants with this phenotype showed mobility scores below reference values. Physical limitations were observed in the first two MIRS grades (37.5-42.1% of the participants) for the TUG and 10MWT. Ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors were the two muscle groups that showed the strongest relationships with mobility scores.

CONCLUSION

Although less impaired, the late-onset phenotype shows significant lower limb muscle weakness associated with physical limitations. The surprising presence of quantitative lower limb muscle weakness in the first two MIRS grades needs to be considered when using this scale. Both ankle dorsiflexors and knee extensors appear to be good indicators of physical limitations in DM1.

Modified dynamic gait index and limits of stability in myotonic dystrophy type 1

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the performance of balance and walking tests in relation to self-reported fall history in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1).

METHODS

Twenty-two (13 male) participants with DM1 completed, a 6-month fall history questionnaire, the modified Dynamic Gait Index (mDGI), limits of stability (LoS) testing, and 10-m walking tests.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) falls in 6 months was 3.7 (3.1), and 19 (86%) participants reported at least 1 fall. Significant differences in mDGI scores (P = 0.006) and 10-m fast walking gait velocity (P = 0.02) were found between those who had been classified as "fallers" and those who had been classified as "nonfallers." Significant correlations were found between mDGI scores and 10-m walking time.

DISCUSSION

Falls are common in DM1, and the mDGI may have potential to distinguish fallers from nonfallers, whereas the LoS failed to detect such impairment. Future studies should further explore use of the mDGI in DM1. Muscle Nerve 58: 694-699, 2018.