Monitoring and management of autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis patients treated with alemtuzumab: practical recommendations

An overview on disease modifying and symptomatic drug treatments for multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory and degenerative autoimmune condition, resulting frequently in a disabling condition. Significant improvements of long-term prognosis have been recently achieved with an early and more aggressive use of disease modifying therapies (DMTs). Addressing the complexity of managing its progressive forms remains a significant challenge.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an update on DMTs for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and progressive MS and their efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action, emphasizing the critical role of biomarkers in optimizing treatment decisions. Moreover, some key information on drugs used to manage symptoms such as pain, fatigue, spasticity and urinary problems will be provided. The literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases covering the period from January 2000 to January 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Major advances have been achieved in the treatment of RRMS. Treatment should start immediately as soon as the neurologist is confident with the diagnosis and its choice should be based on the prognostic profile and on the patient's propensity to accept drug-related risks. The therapeutic landscape for progressive MS is quite disappointing and necessitates further innovation. Personalized medicine, leveraging biomarker insights, holds promise for refining treatment efficacy and patient outcomes.

A case of relapsing anti-GBM disease secondary to alemtuzumab therapy

We report the first case of relapsing anti-GBM disease secondary to alemtuzumab in a 24-year-old female with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Initial anti-GBM disease was detected 10 months after alemtuzumab was given and was diagnosed by demonstrating high anti-GBM antibody titers and with a confirmatory kidney biopsy. The patient presented with a rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis with no pulmonary involvement. After appropriate treatment, the patient went into remission with undetectable anti-GBM antibodies. However, 20 months later, the patient re-presented with relapsing anti-GBM disease. Despite aggressive treatment, the patient became dialysis-dependent.

Alemtuzumab treatment for multiple sclerosis in Austria: An observational long-term outcome study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Observational real-world study to analyze the clinical effects of alemtuzumab (ALEM) and subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT) usage in multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Data retrieved from the Austrian MS treatment registry (AMSTR) included baseline (BL) characteristics (at ALEM start), annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA; ≥ 0.5-point Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; ≥ 0.5-point EDSS decrease), and safety outcomes until initiation of a subsequent DMT. The EDSS was re-baselined at 30 days from ALEM start (BL EDSS).

RESULTS

Eighty-seven ALEM-treated patients (median age: 32 years, 72% female, 14% treatment-naïve) were followed for a median of 55 (interquartile range 31-68) months. We found significant reductions in the ARR from 1.16 before ALEM to 0.15 throughout Years 1-9 (p < 0.001). Subsequent DMTs were initiated in 19 patients (22%, 74% anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). At Year 5 (n = 53), more patients achieved CDI (58%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 45%-71%) than had experienced PIRA (14%, CI 7.5%-24%), and 58% remained relapse-free. Shorter MS duration (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (CI 0.80-0.93)) and no previous high-efficacy treatment (p < 0.001, HR 5.16 (CI 2.66-10.0)) were the best predictors of CDI, while PIRA was associated with a higher number of previous DMTs (p = 0.04, HR 3.06, CI 1.05-8.89). We found no new safety signals.

INTERPRETATION

ALEM had long-lasting beneficial effects on the ARR and disability improvement, especially when initiated early in the course of the disease. Only a subset of patients received subsequent DMTs.

Continued dysregulation of the B cell lineage promotes multiple sclerosis activity despite disease modifying therapies

A clear understanding of the origin and role of the different subtypes of the B cell lineage involved in the activity or remission of multiple sclerosis (MS) is important for the treatment and follow-up of patients living with this disease. B cells, however, are dynamic and can play an anti-inflammatory or pro-inflammatory role, depending on their milieu. Depletion of B cells has been effective in controlling the progression of MS, but it can have adverse side effects. A better understanding of the role of the B cell subtypes, through the use of surface biomarkers of cellular activity with special attention to the function of memory and other regulatory B cells (Bregs), will be necessary in order to offer specific treatments without inducing undesirable effects.

[Alemtuzumab-induced Graves' disease]

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a severe chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, mediated by Th1/Th17 lymphocytes as well as B lymphocytes, macrophages and other immune cells. Some patients with MS are treated with alemtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody against CD52+ cells, which belongs to the disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The main effect of alemtuzumab is related to changes in immune recruitment. Alemtuzumab therapy can induce secondary autoimmunity against the background of immune rebalancing. The thyroid gland is generally involved in the autoimmune process. Graves' disease (GD) develops most often, followed by autoimmune thyroiditis.We present a clinical case of a patient with GD developed after alemtuzumab therapy for MS. The patient was referred to a radiologist at the Department of Radionuclide Therapy of Endocrinology Research Centre for radioiodine therapy (RAIT) due to relapse of thyrotoxicosis after anti-thyroid drug therapy for GD. The goal of treatment was achieved in 2 months, thyroid hormone therapy was initiated, against the background of this, there was compensation of thyroid function.

Lessons from immunotherapies in multiple sclerosis

The improved understanding of multiple sclerosis (MS) neurobiology alongside the development of novel markers of disease will allow precision medicine to be applied to MS patients, bringing the promise of improved care. Combinations of clinical and paraclinical data are currently used for diagnosis and prognosis. The addition of advanced magnetic resonance imaging and biofluid markers has been strongly encouraged, since classifying patients according to the underlying biology will improve monitoring and treatment strategies. For example, silent progression seems to contribute significantly more than relapses to overall disability accumulation, but currently approved treatments for MS act mainly on neuroinflammation and offer only a partial protection against neurodegeneration. Further research, involving traditional and adaptive trial designs, should strive to halt, repair or protect against central nervous system damage. To personalize new treatments, their selectivity, tolerability, ease of administration, and safety must be considered, while to personalize treatment approaches, patient preferences, risk-aversion, and lifestyle must be factored in, and patient feedback used to indicate real-world treatment efficacy. The use of biosensors and machine-learning approaches to integrate biological, anatomical, and physiological parameters will take personalized medicine a step closer toward the patient's virtual twin, in which treatments can be tried before they are applied.

Endocrine and multiple sclerosis outcomes in patients with autoimmune thyroid events in the alemtuzumab CARE-MS studies

Background

Alemtuzumab is an effective therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis. Autoimmune thyroid events are a common adverse event.

Objective

Describe endocrine and multiple sclerosis outcomes over 6 years for alemtuzumab-treated relapsing multiple sclerosis patients in the phase 3 CARE-MS I, II, and extension studies who experienced adverse thyroid events.

Methods

Endocrine and multiple sclerosis outcomes were evaluated over 6 years. Thyroid event cases, excluding those pre-existing or occurring after Year 6, were adjudicated retrospectively by expert endocrinologists independently of the sponsor and investigators.

Results

Thyroid events were reported for 378/811 (46.6%) alemtuzumab-treated patients. Following adjudication, endocrinologists reached consensus on 286 cases (75.7%). Of these, 39.5% were adjudicated to Graves' disease, 2.5% Hashimoto's disease switching to hyperthyroidism, 15.4% Hashimoto's disease, 4.9% Graves' disease switching to hypothyroidism, 10.1% transient thyroiditis, and 27.6% with uncertain diagnosis; inclusion of anti-thyroid antibody status reduced the number of uncertain diagnoses. Multiple sclerosis outcomes of those with and without thyroid events were similar.

Conclusion

Adjudicated thyroid events occurring over 6 years for alemtuzumab-treated relapsing multiple sclerosis patients were primarily autoimmune. Thyroid events were considered manageable and did not affect disease course. Thyroid autoimmunity is a common but manageable adverse event in alemtuzumab-treated relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Numbers: CARE-MS I (NCT00530348); CARE-MS II (NCT00548405); CARE-MS Extension (NCT00930553).

Regulation of the E/I-balance by the neural matrisome

In the mammalian cortex a proper excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance is fundamental for cognitive functions. Especially γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-releasing interneurons regulate the activity of excitatory projection neurons which form the second main class of neurons in the cortex. During development, the maturation of fast-spiking parvalbumin-expressing interneurons goes along with the formation of net-like structures covering their soma and proximal dendrites. These so-called perineuronal nets (PNNs) represent a specialized form of the extracellular matrix (ECM, also designated as matrisome) that stabilize structural synapses but prevent the formation of new connections. Consequently, PNNs are highly involved in the regulation of the synaptic balance. Previous studies revealed that the formation of perineuronal nets is accompanied by an establishment of mature neuronal circuits and by a closure of critical windows of synaptic plasticity. Furthermore, it has been shown that PNNs differentially impinge the integrity of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. In various neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders alterations of PNNs were described and aroused more attention in the last years. The following review gives an update about the role of PNNs for the maturation of parvalbumin-expressing interneurons and summarizes recent findings about the impact of PNNs in different neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders like schizophrenia or epilepsy. A targeted manipulation of PNNs might provide an interesting new possibility to indirectly modulate the synaptic balance and the E/I ratio in pathological conditions.

Late-onset toxicities of monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients

Cancer therapy duration is variable and may take years, adding a new challenge of maintaining the best life quality for cancer survivors. In cancer patients, late-onset toxicities have been reported with monoclonal antibodies and may involve several body organs or systems. They are defined as an autoimmune illnesses that can happen months to years after treatment discontinuation. Late-onset toxicities have become a focus of clinical care and related research. After cancer therapy is completed, the patient should receive longitudinal follow-up to detect these late effects as early as possible. The current review summarizes the recently reported late-onset toxicities of four classes of monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD52, anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and anti-CD20) with guidance for the diagnostic tools, appropriate management and treatment.

Immunophenotyping of Inclusion Body Myositis Blood T and NK Cells

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic potential of targeting highly differentiated T cells in patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM) by establishing high-resolution mapping of killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily G member 1 (KLRG1+) within the T and natural killer (NK) cell compartments.

METHODS

Blood was collected from 51 patients with IBM and 19 healthy age-matched donors. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were interrogated by flow cytometry using a 12-marker antibody panel. The panel allowed the delineation of naive T cells (Tn), central memory T cells (Tcm), 4 stages of effector memory differentiation T cells (Tem 1-4), and effector memory re-expressing CD45RA T cells (TemRA), as well as total and subpopulations of NK cells based on the differential expression of CD16 and C56.

RESULTS

We found that a population of KLRG1+ Tem and TemRA were expanded in both the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subpopulations in patients with IBM. KLRG1 expression in CD8+ T cells increased with T-cell differentiation with the lowest levels of expression in Tn and highest in highly differentiated TemRA and CD56+CD8+ T cells. The frequency of KLRG1+ total NK cells and subpopulations did not differ between patients with IBM and healthy donors. IBM disease duration correlated with increased CD8+ T-cell differentiation.

DISCUSSION

Our findings reveal that the selective expansion of blood KLRG1+ T cells in patients with IBM is confined to the TemRA and Tem cellular compartments.

Failure of alemtuzumab therapy in three patients with MOG antibody associated disease

BACKGROUND

Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is most classically associated in both children and adults with phenotypes including bilateral and recurrent optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis (TM), with the absence of brain lesions characteristic of multiple sclerosis (MS). ADEM phenotype is the most common presentation of MOGAD in children. However, the presence of clinical phenotypes including unilateral ON and short TM in some patients with MOGAD may lead to their misdiagnosis as MS. Thus, clinically and radiologically, MOGAD can mimic MS and clinical vigilance is required for accurate diagnostic workup.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present three cases initially diagnosed as MS and then treated with alemtuzumab. Unexpectedly, all three patients did quite poorly on this medication, with a decline in their clinical status with worsening of expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and an increasing lesion load on magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Subsequently, all three cases were found to have anti-MOG antibody in their serum.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases highlight that if a patient suspected to have MS does not respond to conventional treatments such as alemtuzumab, a search for alternative diagnoses such as MOG antibody disease may be warranted.

Alemtuzumab-Induced Autoimmune Thyroid Dysfunction

Alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody used as a disease-modifying treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), frequently causes autoimmunity as its principal adverse effect. We describe a typical case of a young man treated with two courses of alemtuzumab presenting 18 months later with initial hyperthyroidism due to Graves’ disease (GD) followed by persistent hypothyroidism. We discuss the pathophysiological role of stimulating and blocking thyrotropin receptor antibodies in the development of alemtuzumab-induced autoimmune thyroid dysfunction and clinical challenges posed by spontaneous, bidirectional switching between hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism. Guidelines recommend monitoring thyroid function pre-treatment and every three months for four years following alemtuzumab treatment. Patient education is crucial for maintaining adherence to monitoring programs.

Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases with Therapeutic Antibodies: Lessons Learned from PID Patients Allow for Stratification of the Infection Risk

Over the years, a wide variety of therapeutic antibodies has been successfully introduced in the autoimmunology clinic and many more are on the edge to follow. Many of these treatments address either a pathogenic circulating molecule or a cell-bound molecule. Whereas the former target results in neutralization of the soluble factor, the latter target either inhibits cellular function or induces selective cell death. If this targeted molecule or cell is part of the immune system, this therapy evokes a state of immunodeficiency. Knowing the exact function of the respective components enables the risk stratification for possible infectious complications in patients treated with biologics. Much of the understanding of the function of immune cells and their associated molecules, in relation to redundancy in the immune system, is derived from studies in knockout mice. However, as mice are not men in terms of their life-expectancy, their infection exposure, or the composition of their immune system, the most useful knowledge for estimating the consequence of therapeutic intervention on immune competence comes from monitoring patients. In the current chapter, we focus on patients with a primary immunodeficiency (PID) because they provide us with a unique perspective to estimate the redundancy of a certain genetic defect for overall immune competence. These patients have inborn errors of the immune system that, in general, are due to single gene defects. Depending on the immunological pathway that is defective, patients can present with different types of (opportunistic) infectious diseases, as well as other clinical manifestations. Based on selected examples, we focus in this chapter on finding parallels in the infectious risk of autoimmune patients treated with biologics and PID patients with a defect in the immunological pathway that is affected by the respective biologic. The goal is to learn from the (dis)similarities between both patient populations in terms of safety profiles of biologic treatments.

Immunosuppressors and immunomodulators in Neurology - Part I: a guide for management of patients underimmunotherapy

For patients with autoimmune diseases, the risks and benefits of immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment are a matter of continual concern. Knowledge of the follow-up routine for each drug is crucial, in order to attain better outcomes and avoid new disease activity or occurrence of adverse effects. To achieve control of autoimmune diseases, immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs act on different pathways of the immune response. Knowledge of the mechanisms of action of these drugs and their recommended doses, adverse reactions and risks of infection and malignancy is essential for safe treatment. Each drug has a specific safety profile, and management should be adapted for different circumstances during the treatment. Primary prophylaxis for opportunistic infections and vaccination are indispensable steps during the treatment plan, given that these prevent potential severe infectious complications. General neurologists frequently prescribe immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory drugs, and awareness of the characteristics of each drug is crucial for treatment success. Implementation of a routine before, during and after use of these drugs avoids treatment-related complications and enables superior disease control.

The Disease-Modifying Therapies of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Liver Injury: A Narrative Review

In this narrative review, we analyze pre-registration and post-marketing data concerning hepatotoxicity of all disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) available for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, including beta interferon, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, cladribine, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab. We review the proposed causal mechanisms described in the literature and we also address issues like use of DMTs in patients with viral hepatitis or liver cirrhosis. Most data emerged in the post-marketing phase by reports to national pharmacovigilance agencies and published case reports or case series. Serious liver adverse events are rare, but exact incidence is largely unknown, as are predictive factors. Unfortunately, none of the DMTs currently available for the treatment of multiple sclerosis is free of potential hepatic toxic effects. Cases of acute liver failure have been reported for beta-interferon, fingolimod, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab by different mechanisms (idiosyncratic reaction, autoimmune hepatitis, or viral reactivation). Patients with multiple sclerosis should be informed about possible hepatic side effects of their treatment. Most cases of liver injury are idiosyncratic and unpredictable. The specific monitoring schedule for each DMT has been reviewed and the clinician should be ready to recognize clinical symptoms suggestive for liver injury. Not all DMTs are indicated in cirrhotic patients. For some DMTs, screening for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus is required before starting treatment and a monitoring or antiviral prophylaxis schedule has been established. Beta interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, and alemtuzumab are relatively contraindicated in autoimmune hepatitis due to the risk of disease exacerbation.

A review of possible therapies for multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system with a wide range of symptoms, like executive function defect, cognitive dysfunction, blurred vision, decreased sensation, spasticity, fatigue, and other symptoms. This neurological disease is characterized by the destruction of the blood-brain barrier, loss of myelin, and damage to neurons. It is the result of immune cells crossing the blood-brain barrier into the central nervous system and attacking self-antigens. Heretofore, many treatments proved that they can retard the progression of the disease even though there is no cure. Therefore, treatments aimed at improving patients' quality of life and reducing adverse drug reactions and costs are essential. In this review, the treatment approaches to alleviate the progress of MS include the following: pharmacotherapy, antibody therapy, cell therapy, gene therapy, and surgery. The current treatment methods of MS are described in terms of the prevention of myelin shedding, the promotion of myelin regeneration, and the protection of neurons.

Prevention and management of adverse effects of disease modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the currently known side effects of the approved therapies of multiple sclerosis and to suggest monitoring procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The progress in the treatment of multiple sclerosis with new very effective therapies is accompanied by a number of side effects. Some of these have already been described in the approval studies, but some only after approval in a real world situation. The reason for this is the short duration of the clinical studies, the very heterogeneous patient profile in the real world setting with a number of comorbidities, pretherapies, and wider age range. The side effects may occur during application of therapies or afterwards during the course of the treatment. The side effects may range from mild infections, mild laboratory abnormalities, secondary autoimmune diseases to life-threatening side effects such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

SUMMARY

It has to be pointed out that these side effects are not to be considered as final and neurologists should be vigilant against new unknown side effects. The doctor should be aware of these undesirable effects, should weigh the benefits of the therapies against the risks, but at the same time she/he should keep in mind that multiple sclerosis can be a very disabling disease if not treated properly.

Safety of Newer Disease Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

In the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal for multiple sclerosis has expanded greatly. Newer more potent disease modifying therapies (DMTs) with varying mechanisms of actions are increasingly used early in the disease course. These newer DMTs include oral therapies (teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and cladribine) and infusion therapies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab), and are associated with better control of disease activity and long-term outcomes in patients with MS compared to older injectable therapies (interferon beta and glatiramer acetate). However, they are associated with safety concerns and subsequent monitoring requirements. Adverse events are initially observed in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, and further long-term data are collected in phase 3 extension studies, case series, and post-marketing reports, which highlight the need to periodically re-evaluate and adjust monitoring strategies to optimize treatment safety in an individualized approach.

Alemtuzumab: A Review in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada^®) is an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody approved in the EU for the treatment of highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In phase 3 trials in patients with active RRMS, intravenous alemtuzumab was more effective than subcutaneous interferon β-1a in terms of decreasing relapse rates (in treatment-naïve or -experienced patients) and disability progression (treatment-experienced patients). Treatment benefits were maintained over up to 9 years of follow-up, with ≈ 50% of patients not requiring retreatment. The efficacy of alemtuzumab in patients with highly active disease was generally similar to that in the overall population. Alemtuzumab has an acceptable tolerability profile, with infusion-associated reactions, infections and autoimmunity being the main safety and tolerability issues. Current evidence indicates that alemtuzumab is an effective treatment option for adults with highly active RRMS, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and convenient treatment regimen.

Systemic erythematous lupus after treatment of multiple sclerosis with alemtuzumab

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD52 protein that has shown great efficacy in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and is associated with prolonged remission of the disease. Although it is highly effective, alemtuzumab can lead to serious adverse advents among which the most common are secondary autoimmune diseases. We present a patient who was treated with alemtuzumab for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Her disease remained stable in a follow-up period of over ten years. However, during the follow-up period she developed thyroiditis one year, as well as systemic erythematous lupus seven years after the last alemtuzumab infusion, a disease not previously associated with alemtuzumab administration.

Renal-Limited Antiglomerular Basement Membrane Disease Related To Alemtuzumab: A Case Report

Rationale:

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Many autoimmune-mediated adverse events have been associated with alemtuzumab, including renal-limited anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease.

Presenting concern:

A 52-year-old female with RRMS presented with acute kidney injury 39 months after receiving 1 cycle of alemtuzumab. She had a history of alemtuzumab-associated hypothyroidism and thrombocytopenia, urinary tract infections, and chronically abnormal urinalyses.

Diagnosis:

A diagnosis of renal-limited anti-GBM disease was made based on renal biopsy and positive anti-GBM serology. Alemtuzumab was thought to be the trigger of the anti-GBM disease as there were no other exposures or serologic findings suggesting other causes.

Interventions:

She was treated with corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and plasmapheresis. She required hemodialysis for acute renal failure.

Outcomes:

Despite treatment, the patient’s renal function did not recover. She remained dialysis-dependent and anti-GBM antibody titers remained elevated 6 months after presentation.

Teaching points:

Anti-GBM disease is a life-altering adverse event that can be associated with alemtuzumab. Our case highlights the limitations of monitoring urinalyses as a trigger for anti-GBM antibody testing in patients who have received alemtuzumab and have baseline abnormal urinalyses; such patients may require further protocolized anti-GBM antibody testing, although the optimal frequency of such antibody screening remains unclear.

[Updated recommendations of the Council of Experts on the use and safety of alemtuzumab (Lemtrada)]

Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) is a recombinant humanized IgG1 kappa monoclonal antibody to the surface cell glycoprotein, a CD52 differentiation cluster. The drug is approved for use in more than 65 countries, including the Russian Federation. The drug is one of the most effective methods of treating patients with aggressive multiple sclerosis, but the risk management plan should be followed. The safety profile of the drug includes infusion-associated reactions, thyroid dysfunction, immune cytopenia, acute cardiovascular events, infections, and other autoimmune diseases. This publication provides updated practical recommendations for the use of the drug and ensuring the safety of patients treated with alemtuzumab.

Long-term drug treatment in multiple sclerosis: safety success and concerns

INTRODUCTION

The portfolio of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease modifying treatments (DMTs) has significantly expanded over the past two decades. Given the lifelong use of MS pharmacotherapy, understanding their long-term safety profiles is essential in determining suitable and personalized treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, we summarize the short-, mid-, and long-term safety profile of currently available MS DMTs categories. In addition to the initial trial findings, safety outcomes derived from long-term extension studies (≥5-20 years) and safety-based prescription programs have been reviewed. In order to better understand the risk-benefit ratio for each particular DMT group, a short description of the DMT-based efficacy outcomes has been included.

EXPERT OPINION

Long-term extension trials, large observational studies and real-world databases allow detection of rare and potentially serious adverse events. Two-year-long trials are unable to fully capture the positive and negative effects of immune system modulation and reconstitution. DMT-based monitoring programs can provide greater insights regarding safe use of MS medications in different patient populations and clinical settings. During the process of shared DMT decision, both MS care providers and their patients should be aware of an ever-expanding number of drug-based adverse events and their influence on the risk-benefit analysis.

Anti-CD52 blocks EAE independent of PD-1 signals and promotes repopulation dominated by double-negative T cells and newly generated T and B cells

Lymphocyte depletion using anti-CD52 antibody effectively reduces relapses of multiple sclerosis (MS). To begin to understand what mechanisms might control this outcome, we examined the effect of a murine-CD52-specific mAb on the depletion and repopulation of immune cells in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a model of MS. We tested whether the tolerance-promoting receptor programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) is required for disease remission post anti-CD52, and found that PD-1-deficient mice with a more severe EAE were nevertheless effectively treated with anti-CD52. Anti-CD52 increased the proportions of newly generated T cells and double-negative (DN) T cells while reducing newly generated B cells; the latter effect being associated with a higher expression of CD52 by these cells. In the longer term, anti-CD52 caused substantial increases in the proportion of newly generated lymphocytes and DN T cells in mice with EAE. Thus, the rapid repopulation of lymphocytes from central lymphoid organs post anti-CD52 may limit further disease. Furthermore, these data identify DN T cells, a subset with immunoregulatory potential, as a significant hyperrepopulating subset following CD52-mediated depletion.

Quality of Life Improves with Alemtuzumab Over 6 Years in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients with or without Autoimmune Thyroid Adverse Events: Post Hoc Analysis of the CARE-MS Studies

Introduction

In clinical trials of alemtuzumab, autoimmune thyroid adverse events (AEs) were frequent. Here, we assess the impact of thyroid AEs on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in alemtuzumab-treated patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Methods

In phase 3 CARE-MS I (NCT00530348) and II (NCT00548405) trials, patients with RRMS were administered alemtuzumab 12 mg/day on 5 consecutive days at baseline and on 3 consecutive days 12 months later. Patients could participate in an extension study (NCT00930553) through year 6. HRQL was assessed at baseline and annually using the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS), EuroQoL-5 Dimension Visual Analog Scale (EQ-5D VAS), and 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaires. Outcomes were analyzed in patients with or without thyroid AEs (nonserious or serious). A subset of patients with thyroid AEs was analyzed to assess HRQL before and during the onset of thyroid AEs.

Results

A total of 811 CARE-MS patients were treated with alemtuzumab. Of these, 342 (42%) patients experienced thyroid AEs over 6 years; serious thyroid AEs occurred in 44 (5%) patients. At year 6, HRQL outcomes generally remained slightly improved or similar to core study baseline in alemtuzumab-treated patients with or without thyroid AEs: FAMS (least-squares mean change from baseline without thyroid AEs, 0.7; with nonserious thyroid AEs, 5.1; with serious thyroid AEs, − 5.3), EQ-5D VAS (2.0; 3.0; − 6.8), SF-36 mental component summary (MCS [0.6; 1.6; − 2.8]), SF-36 physical component summary (PCS [0.8; 1.0; 1.1]). Over 6 years, 63–82% of patients in each group had improved/stable SF-36 MCS and PCS scores. Among patients with thyroid AE onset in year 3 (peak incidence), there were minimal differences between HRQL outcomes before onset (year 2) and after onset (year 3).

Conclusion

Autoimmune thyroid AEs (serious and nonserious) had minimal impact on HRQL in alemtuzumab-treated patients. These data may aid therapeutic decisions in patients with relapsing MS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40120-020-00191-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

This study looked at alemtuzumab, an approved treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). People who receive alemtuzumab may develop thyroid problems. The researchers wanted to know whether people who developed thyroid problems with alemtuzumab had a worse quality of life compared with those who did not. The researchers measured quality of life using a questionnaire. The questionnaire looked at people’s physical, social, and psychological well-being over 6 years. A total of 811 people with MS treated with alemtuzumab took part in this study. Of these, 469 people (58%) did not develop thyroid problems and 342 people (42%) developed thyroid problems. The thyroid problems were serious in 44 people. The researchers observed that thyroid problems during alemtuzumab treatment did not make quality of life worse in most people. Some people with serious thyroid problems had worsened quality of life; this was mostly among people who required certain treatments for their thyroid problems. Quality of life did not change much in people while the thyroid problems were ongoing. This study shows that thyroid problems after alemtuzumab treatment for MS have little negative impact on quality of life for most people. These findings may help healthcare providers make decisions about MS treatment.

Established and Emerging Immunological Complications of Biological Therapeutics in Multiple Sclerosis

Biologic immunotherapies have transformed the treatment landscape of multiple sclerosis. Such therapies include recombinant proteins (interferon beta), as well as monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, daclizumab, rituximab and ocrelizumab). Monoclonal antibodies show particular efficacy in the treatment of the inflammatory phase of multiple sclerosis. However, the immunological perturbations caused by biologic therapies are associated with significant immunological adverse reactions. These include development of neutralising immunogenicity, secondary immunodeficiency and secondary autoimmunity. These complications can affect the balance of risks and benefits of biologic agents, and 2018 saw the withdrawal from the market of daclizumab, an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody, due to concerns about the development of severe, unpredictable autoimmunity. Here we review established and emerging risks associated with multiple sclerosis biologic agents, with an emphasis on their immunological adverse effects. We also discuss the specific challenges that multiple sclerosis biologics pose to drug safety systems, and the potential for improvements in safety frameworks.

Effect of Alemtuzumab Infusions on Vital Signs: A Prospective Observational Study in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background

Alemtuzumab efficacy and safety were established in phase 3 randomized trials. We characterize vital signs during and after the first alemtuzumab infusion course.

Methods

Patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis commercially prescribed alemtuzumab 12 mg/day on 5 consecutive days (initial course) were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. Preinfusion medications included methylprednisolone, antihistamine, and antipyretics. Primary end point: change from precourse baseline in vital signs during and 2 hours after each alemtuzumab infusion. Secondary end points: infusion duration and serious adverse events (AEs) starting within 24 hours and within 7 days after infusion (AEs collected up to 15 days after treatment). Potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities were based on predefined thresholds from literature review.

Results

In the 304 patients treated, minimal increases in mean systolic (≤8 mm Hg) and diastolic (≤3 mm Hg) blood pressures from precourse baseline were observed on infusion days 3 to 5. An increase in mean heart rate (20 beats per minute) during the first infusion day normalized by day 2, and smaller increases (5 beats per minute) occurred during subsequent infusions. Serious AEs occurred in two patients (0.7%) during or within 24 hours after infusion and in three patients (1.0%) within 7 days. Mean/median infusion duration was 4 hours. Vital sign abnormalities with potential clinical significance occurred in 62.5% of patients.

Conclusions

Although most patients had potentially clinically significant vital sign abnormalities, mean changes from baseline during and after infusion of the first alemtuzumab course were clinically insignificant. No new safety signals were detected.

Age and the risks of high-efficacy disease modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A variety of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are available for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). After evaluation and approval by regulatory agencies, DMTs are likely to be administered to patients whose characteristics differ from those enrolled in clinical trials. This may contribute to the emergence of unexpected adverse events observed in the real-world setting. Higher age may be a relevant factor that could change the benefit-risk balance of DMTs, as it may associate with lower efficiency and higher frequency of adverse events.

RECENT FINDINGS

The absolute and relative number of patients with MS who reach the age of 55 and higher increases. Growing evidence demonstrates lower efficacy of DMTs in older persons with MS. Specific risks during DMTs for MS, such as the risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) or the outcome following PML, have been associated with age. It is hypothesized that age-related and therapy-induced alterations to the immune system may have (super)additive effects, resulting in an acceleration of physiological immunosenescence and inflamm-aging.

SUMMARY

In this article, we review the risks of high-efficacy DMTs in MS with a specific focus on age-related efficacy and risks, including opportunistic infections, malignancies, and autoimmune reactions.

Managing Risks with Immune Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Since the introduction of the interferons in the 1990s, a multitude of different immunomodulatory and immunosuppressant disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been developed. They have all shown positive effects on clinical endpoints such as relapse rate and disease progression and are a heterogeneous group of therapeutics comprising recombinant pegylated and non-pegylated interferon-β variants, peptide combinations, monoclonal antibodies, and small molecules. However, they have relevant side effect profiles, which necessitate thorough monitoring and straightforward patient education. In individual cases, side effects can be severe and potentially life-threatening, which is why knowledge about (neurological and non-neurological) adverse drug reactions is essential for prescribing neurologists as well as general practitioners. This paper aims to provide an overview of currently available MS therapies, their modes of action and safety profiles, and the necessary therapy monitoring.

Alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis in real-world clinical practice: A report from a single Italian center

BACKGROUND

Alemtuzumab, is a compound approved for highly active MS, and, in Europe, employed after the use of other disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) with an escalation approach or used as a first therapeutic option. The occurrence of secondary autoimmune adverse events and or infections can differ depending on the employed approach.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in real-world MS population that encompassed patients previously treated with other DMTs.

METHODS

35 patients, treated with alemtuzumab in a single MS Center, were followed for at least 36 months. The study investigated the prevalence of patients reaching the phase of the non-active disease (NEDA-3). All the adverse events were also reported, and correlations assessed.

RESULTS

At the 36-month follow-up, 66,7% of patients achieved the NEDA-3 status, 90,5% of the patients were relapse-free, 85,7% showed no signs of disability progression, nor signs of MRI activity. Adverse events were observed in 45,7% of the patients and ranked as severe in 23% of them. Cases of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), pancytopenia, viral hepatitis E, and noninfectious meningo-encephalomyelitis were found and reported. For these complications, the post hoc analysis showed possible interactive factors and causality related to previous DMT treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world MS population like the one investigated in our study, alemtuzumab was found to be an effective treatment when employed as an escalation or rescue therapy. The compound exhibits a variable safety profile and frequent adverse events that are likely depending on previous treatments and their impact on the immune system.

Immunological Aspects of Approved MS Therapeutics

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurological immune-mediated disease leading to disability in young adults. The outcome of the disease is unpredictable, and over time, neurological disabilities accumulate. Interferon beta-1b was the first drug to be approved in the 1990s for relapsing-remitting MS to modulate the course of the disease. Over the past two decades, the treatment landscape has changed tremendously. Currently, more than a dozen drugs representing 1 substances with different mechanisms of action have been approved (interferon beta preparations, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, siponimod, mitoxantrone, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, cladribine, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, and natalizumab). Ocrelizumab was the first medication to be approved for primary progressive MS. The objective of this review is to present the modes of action of these drugs and their effects on the immunopathogenesis of MS. Each agent's clinical development and potential side effects are discussed.

Autoimmune Thyroid Disease in Islet Transplant Recipients Discontinuing Immunosuppression Late After Lymphodepletion

CONTEXT

Clinical islet transplantation (CIT) is an innovative strategy to treat highly selected individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Lymphodepletion with alemtuzumab or thymoglobulin is often used for induction therapy in CIT. Alemtuzumab was recently licensed as a treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In RRMS, autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) has developed in up to 40% of individuals treated with alemtuzumab. The appearance of AITD after CIT is not well described. We herein explore factors associated with AITD developing after CIT and any relationship with exposure to lymphodepleting antibodies (alemtuzumab or thymoglobulin).

CASE DESCRIPTION

Five cases of AITD developing after CIT for T1DM are described. All were female. Four cases had received alemtuzumab (20 to 40 mg) prior to at least one islet infusion, and one received thymoglobulin induction. The presentation with AITD was 18 to 135 months after first transplant and 11 to 18 months after withdrawal of all maintenance immunosuppression (IS). Four cases presented with clinical and biochemical evidence of hyperthyroidism from Graves disease. One case presented with biochemical evidence of hypothyroidism and positive TSH receptor antibodies. All were treated with conventional therapies for AITD.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite routine use of alemtuzumab, clinical presentations of AITD seem to be uncommon in patients with CIT receiving IS. However, AITD can develop after withdrawal of IS, highlighting the need for careful thyroid surveillance in this population.

Best Practices for Long-Term Monitoring and Follow-Up of Alemtuzumab-Treated MS Patients in Real-World Clinical Settings

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune neurological disease that typically affects young adults, causing irreversible physical disability and cognitive impairment. Alemtuzumab, administered intravenously as 2 initial courses of 12 mg/day (5 consecutive days at baseline, and 3 consecutive days 12 months later), resulted in significantly greater improvements in clinical and MRI outcomes vs. subcutaneous interferon beta-1a over 2 years in patients with active relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) who were either treatment-naive (CARE-MS I; NCT00530348) or had an inadequate response to prior therapy (CARE-MS II; NCT00548405). Efficacy with alemtuzumab was maintained over 7 years in subsequent extension studies (NCT00930553; NCT02255656), in the absence of continuous treatment and with a consistent safety profile. There is an increased incidence of autoimmune events in patients treated with alemtuzumab (mainly thyroid events, but also immune thrombocytopenia and nephropathy), which imparts a need for mandatory safety monitoring for 4 years following the last treatment. The risk management strategy for alemtuzumab-treated patients includes laboratory monitoring and a comprehensive patient education and support program that enables early detection and effective management of autoimmune events, yielding optimal outcomes for MS patients. Here we provide an overview of tools and techniques that have been implemented in real-world clinical settings to reduce the burden of monitoring for both patients and healthcare providers, including customized educational materials, the use of social media, and interactive online databases for managing healthcare data. Many practices are also enhancing patient outreach efforts through coordination with specialized nursing services and ancillary caregivers. The best practice recommendations for safety monitoring described in this article, based on experiences in real-world clinical settings, may enable early detection and management of autoimmune events, and help with implementation of monitoring requirements while maximizing the benefits of alemtuzumab treatment for MS patients.

Potential mechanisms of action related to the efficacy and safety of cladribine

Oral cladribine is a novel treatment for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This appears to be a semi-selective immune-reconstitution therapy that induces long-term therapy from short treatment cycles. It has a relatively good safety profile that currently does not require extensive monitoring associated with some continuous immunosuppressive and relatively non-selective immune reconstitution therapies. The efficacy and safety of cladribine relates to its particular physicochemical properties, the function of the lymphocyte subsets that are selectively targeted by the drug and the repopulation kinetics of these subsets. As such, there is marked and long-term depletion of memory B cell subsets, which probably relates to the therapeutic efficacy. This is also coupled with a more limited, but likewise long-term, depletion of CD4 T subsets. There is limited depletion of cells of the innate immune system and modest effects on CD8 and probably plasma cells, which provide immediate and durable protection from infection. Targeting of CD4 T regulatory cells, CD8 T suppressor cells and regulatory B cell subsets appears more limited as these populations recover rapidly and so repopulating pathogenic cells re-emerge into a regulatory environment. This appears to lead to re-establishment of immune-tolerance that produces long-term control of MS. Although this hypothesis contains a number of unknown details, it is based on knowledge about the biology of cladribine, basic immunology and the effects of other high-efficacy B and T cell depleting agents that exhibit stereotyped repopulation behaviours. These concepts are relatively simple to interrogate, and can be modified as new knowledge about the durability of disease control and safety with cladribine emerges.