Newly developed stroke in patients admitted to non-neurological intensive care units

Neurologic Complications of Critical Medical Illness

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the neurologic complications encountered in patients admitted to non-neurologic intensive care units, outlines various scenarios in which a neurologic consultation can add to the diagnosis or management of a critically ill patient, and provides advice on the best diagnostic approach in the evaluation of these patients.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Increasing recognition of neurologic complications and their adverse impact on long-term outcomes has led to increased neurology involvement in non-neurologic intensive care units. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of having a structured clinical approach to neurologic complications of critical illness as well as the critical care management of patients with chronic neurologic disabilities.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Critical illness is often accompanied by neurologic complications. Neurologists need to be aware of the unique needs of critically ill patients, especially the nuances of the neurologic examination, challenges in diagnostic testing, and neuropharmacologic aspects of commonly used medications.

Neurorecovery after Critical COVID-19 Illness

With the hundreds of millions of people worldwide who have been, and continue to be, affected by pandemic coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and its chronic sequelae, strategies to improve recovery and rehabilitation from COVID-19 are critical global public health priorities. Neurologic complications have been associated with acute COVID-19 infection, usually in the setting of critical COVID-19 illness. Neurologic complications are also a core feature of the symptom constellation of long COVID and portend poor outcomes. In this article, we review neurologic complications and their mechanisms in critical COVID-19 illness and long COVID. We focus on parallels with neurologic disease associated with non-COVID critical systemic illness. We conclude with a discussion of how recent findings can guide both neurologists working in post-acute neurologic rehabilitation facilities and policy makers who influence neurologic resource allocation.

Recognition of Strokes in the ICU: A Narrative Review

Despite the remarkable progress in acute treatment for stroke, in-hospital stroke is still devastating. The mortality and neurological sequelae are worse in patients with in-hospital stroke than in those with community-onset stroke. The leading cause of this tragic situation is the delay in emergent treatment. To achieve better outcomes, early stroke recognition and immediate treatment are crucial. In general, in-hospital stroke is initially witnessed by non-neurologists, but it is sometimes challenging for non-neurologists to diagnose a patient's state as a stroke and respond quickly. Therefore, understanding the risk and characteristics of in-hospital stroke would be helpful for early recognition. First, we need to know "the epicenter of in-hospital stroke". Critically ill patients and patients who undergo surgery or procedures are admitted to the intensive care unit, and they are potentially at high risk for stroke. Moreover, since they are often sedated and intubated, evaluating their neurological status concisely is difficult. The limited evidence demonstrated that the intensive care unit is the most common place for in-hospital strokes. This paper presents a review of the literature and clarifies the causes and risks of stroke in the intensive care unit.

Prevalence and independent predictors of in-hospital stroke among patients who developed acute alteration of consciousness in the medical intensive care unit: A retrospective case-control study

Background

In-hospital stroke is a serious event, associated with poor outcomes and high mortality. However, identifying signs of stroke may be more difficult in critically ill patients.

Objectives

This study investigated the prevalence and independent predictors of in-hospital stroke among patients with acute alteration of consciousness in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) who underwent subsequent brain computed tomography (CT).

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled eligible patients during the period 2007 - 2017. The alterations researched were radiologically confirmed acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).

Results

Of 4 360 patients, 113 underwent brain CT. Among these, 31% had AIS, while 15% had ICH. They had higher diastolic blood pressures and arterial pH than non-stroke patients. ICH patients had higher mean (standard deviation (SD) systolic blood pressures (152 (48) v. 129 (25) mmHg; p=0.01), lower mean (SD) Glasgow Coma Scale scores (4 (3) v. 7 (4); p=0.004), and more pupillary abnormalities (75% v. 9%; p<0.001) than AIS patients. AIS patients were older (65 (18) v. 57 (18) years; p=0.03), had more hypertension (60% v. 39%; p=0.04), and more commonly presented with the Babinski sign (26% v. 9%; p=0.04). Multivariate analysis found that pupillary abnormalities independently predicted ICH (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 26.9; 95% CI 3.7 - 196.3; p=0.001). The Babinski sign (aOR 5.1; 95% CI 1.1 - 23.5; p=0.04) and alkalaemia (arterial pH >7.4; aOR 3.6; 95% CI 1.0 - 12.3; p=0.05) independently predicted AIS.

Conclusion

Forty-six percent of the cohort had ICH or AIS. Both conditions had high mortality. The presence of pupillary abnormalities predicts ICH, whereas the Babinski sign and alkalaemia predict AIS.

Contributions of the study

The present study reports that almost half (46%) of critically ill patients with alterations of consciousness had an acute stroke. Of these, two-thirds had an acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), and one-third had an intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). Multivariate analysis revealed that a pupillary abnormality was a predictor for ICH and the Babinski sign was identified as a predictor of AIS.

Comparing characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke

BACKGROUND

In-hospital strokes account for 4-17% of all strokes and usually lead to urgent and severe conditions. However, features of in-hospital strokes have been scarcely reported in China, and the management systems of in-hospital strokes are unestablished. The study aims to analyze the characteristics of in-hospital strokes in comparison to community-onset strokes and provides evidence for the development of national in-patient stroke care systems.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with in-hospital strokes (IHS group) and community-onset strokes (COS group) hospitalized in our hospital between June 2012, and January 2022. Clinical characteristics, care measures, and outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1162 patients (age 61 ± 16 and 65% male) were included, of whom 193 (16.6%) had an in-hospital stroke and 969 (83.4%) had community-onset stroke. Compared with COS group, patients in IHS group had higher NIHSS at onset (7.25 vs 5.96, P = 0.054), higher use of endovascular therapy (10.4% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001), and lower use of intravascular thrombolysis (1.6% vs 7.2%, P = 0.003). Also, in-hospital strokes were associated with lower rate of mRS0-2 at discharge (OR[95%CI] = 0.674[0.49, 0.926], P = 0.015) and increased in-hospital mobility (OR[95%CI] = 3.621[1.640, 7.996], P = 0.001), after adjusting for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Compared with community-onset strokes, the patients with in-hospital stroke had insufficient urgent treatment and poorer outcomes, reflecting the need for increased awareness of in-patient stroke, and strategies to streamline in-hospital acute stroke care.

Trends and Outcomes of Oral Anticoagulation With Direct Current Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter at an Academic Medical Center

Background

Increasing reports suggest the safe use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in electrical cardioversion. The aim of this study was to assess the trends and 30-day outcomes associated with anticoagulation for cardioversion.

Methods

Patients who underwent electrical cardioversion from January 2015 to October 2020 with a 30-day follow-up were included; and outcomes including stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and major gastrointestinal bleeding were recorded.

Results

Of the 515 patients, 351 (68%) were men and 164 (32%) were women, with a mean CHA2DS2VASc score of 2.6 ± 1.6. Outpatient apixaban use increased from 10% in 2015 to 46% in 2020 (P < 0.001) with a decline in the use of warfarin from 24% in 2015 to 10% in 2020 (P = 0.023). Apixaban use peri-procedurally for cardioversion increased from 32% in 2015 to 35% in 2020 (P = 0.317), while warfarin use decreased from 23% in 2015 to 14% in 2020 (P = 0.164). At discharge, apixaban prescriptions increased from 21% in 2015 to 61% in 2020 (P < 0.001), while warfarin prescriptions declined from 30% in 2015 to 13% in 2020 (P = 0.009). No ICH was recorded in the 30 days after cardioversion. Ischemic stroke occurred in four (0.7%) patients with one (0.29%) of the 338 patients on a DOAC, one (0.8%) of the 124 patients on warfarin and two (5.5%) of the 36 patients not receiving anticoagulation post cardioversion. There were seven (1%) major gastrointestinal bleeding events in patients on oral anticoagulation, of which four (3%) were on warfarin and three (0.8%) were on DOACs.

Conclusions

Our study shows the increasing and safe use of DOACs for the purpose of cardioversion. The rates of 30-day ischemic stroke post cardioversion were low and only occurred in patients admitted in the intensive care unit.

Neurological and clinical status from early time point to long-term follow-up after in-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM

We aimed to evaluate neurological profiles of patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) from early time points to long-term follow-up periods.

METHODS

For this prospective cohort study, we established a neurological rapid response team, and serially evaluated the neurological status of patients with IHCA from the initial resuscitation to 12 months after the onset of IHCA. The primary outcome was good neurological status defined as a Clinical Performance Category score of 1-2 at 12 months after IHCA. The secondary outcomes included the awakening and neurological recovery during the first week, the survival and neurological status at hospital discharge, and the survival at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 291 adult patients with IHCA were included. On the first day and during the first week after IHCA, the awakening was achieved in 61 (21.0 %) and 119 patients (40.9 %), respectively; and neurological recovery in 12 (4.1 %) and 46 patients (15.8 %), respectively. Epileptic seizures developed in 9.7 % following restoration of spontaneous circulation. At hospital discharge, 106 patients (36.4 %) had survived; among them, 63.2 % showed good neurological status. At 12 months, 63 (21.6 %) patients survived; among them, 81.7 % showed good neurological status (17.0 % among all patients with IHCA). Of patients without awakening during the first 3 and 7 days, 2.7 % and 1.2 % showed good neurological status at 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with IHCA, awakening and neurological recovery were remarkable throughout the first week. Survival and good neurological status were substantial at 12 months after IHCA.