The no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) concept in MS: impact of spinal cord MRI

Limited added value of systematic spinal cord MRI vs brain MRI alone to classify patients with MS as active or inactive during follow-up

BACKGROUND

The utility of systematic spinal cord (SC) MRI for monitoring disease activity after a multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis remains a topic of debate.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the frequency of disease activity when considering brain MRI alone versus both brain and SC MRI and to identify factors associated with the occurrence of new SC lesions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging data prospectively collected over 5 years as part of the EMISEP cohort study. A total of 221 intervals (with both brain and spinal cord MRI scans available at 2 consecutive time-points) from 68 patients were analysed. For each interval, brain (3D Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR, axial T2 and axial PD) and SC MRI (sagittal T2 and phase-sensitive inversion recovery, axial T2*w and 3D T1) were reviewed to detect new lesions. Each interval was classified as symptomatic (with relapse) or asymptomatic. The baseline brain and SC lesion numbers were computed.

RESULTS

SC MRI activity without clinical relapse and/or brain MRI activity was rare (4 out of 221 intervals, 2%). The occurrence of a new SC lesion was associated with the number of brain lesions at baseline (OR = 1.002 [1.000; 1.0004], p = 0.015) and the occurrence of a new brain lesion during the interval (OR = 1.170 [1.041; 1.314], p = 0.009), but not with the baseline SC lesion number (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the current guidelines recommending routine disease monitoring with brain MRI alone, even in patients with a high SC lesion load.

Spinal cord evaluation in multiple sclerosis: clinical and radiological associations, present and future

Spinal cord disease is important in most people with multiple sclerosis, but assessment remains less emphasized in patient care, basic and clinical research and therapeutic trials. The North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Spinal Cord Interest Group was formed to determine and present the contemporary landscape of multiple sclerosis spinal cord evaluation, further existing and advanced spinal cord imaging techniques, and foster collaborative work. Important themes arose: (i) multiple sclerosis spinal cord lesions (differential diagnosis, association with clinical course); (ii) spinal cord radiological-pathological associations; (iii) 'critical' spinal cord lesions; (iv) multiple sclerosis topographical model; (v) spinal cord atrophy; and (vi) automated and special imaging techniques. Distinguishing multiple sclerosis from other myelopathic aetiology is increasingly refined by imaging and serological studies. Post-mortem spinal cord findings and MRI pathological correlative studies demonstrate MRI's high sensitivity in detecting microstructural demyelination and axonal loss. Spinal leptomeninges include immune inflammatory infiltrates, some in B-cell lymphoid-like structures. 'Critical' demyelinating lesions along spinal cord corticospinal tracts are anatomically consistent with and may be disproportionately associated with motor progression. Multiple sclerosis topographical model implicates the spinal cord as an area where threshold impairment associates with multiple sclerosis disability. Progressive spinal cord atrophy and 'silent' multiple sclerosis progression may be emerging as an important multiple sclerosis prognostic biomarker. Manual atrophy assessment is complicated by rater bias, while automation (e.g. Spinal Cord Toolbox), and artificial intelligence may reduce this. Collaborative research by the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis and similar groups with experts combining distinct strengths is key to advancing assessment and treatment of people with multiple sclerosis spinal cord disease.

Spinal cord MRI activity in multiple sclerosis: Predictive value for relapses and impact on treatment decisions

INTRODUCTION

Emerging evidence suggests the prognostic value of spinal cord (SC) pathology in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the 2021 MAGNIMS-CMSC-NAIMS guidelines don't recommend routine SC MRI for disease monitoring. This study investigates the frequency of new asymptomatic and isolated SC lesions, exploring their potential to predict clinical activity and guide treatment decisions.

METHODS

We enrolled relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients who underwent brain and SC MRI at baseline and after 12 months. New, enlarged, or gadolinium-enhanced (Gd+) lesions on MRI were considered disease activity markers. Clinical relapses and treatment changes observed 3 months after the 12-month MRI were analyzed using regression analysis, evaluating their association with worsening SC findings.

RESULTS

A total of 201 RRMS patients (56 males, 27.9%, mean age 42.5 ± 12.1 years, mean EDSS 2.7 ± 1.9) were included. Isolated worsening of T2 lesion burden in the SC occurred in 16 patients (8%), and 12 (6%) had Gd + lesions. Among patients without brain MRI activity (n = 138), regression analysis revealed a significant association between new Gd + SC lesions and clinical relapses within 3 months of the 12-month MRI (p = 0.024). Worsening SC findings (p = 0.021) and SC lesion enhancement (p = 0.046) emerged as key factors influencing disease-modifying therapy changes within 3 months in these patients. Notably, even without clinical symptoms, worsening SC findings significantly predicted treatment changes (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the independent value of SC MRI findings in MS monitoring. Importantly, isolated and asymptomatic SC worsening significantly impacted treatment decisions.

Limited utility of adding 3T cervical spinal cord MRI to monitor disease activity in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Performing routine brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely accepted as the standard of care for disease monitoring in multiple sclerosis (MS), but the utility of performing routine spinal cord (SC) MRI for this purpose is still debatable.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the frequency of new isolated cervical spinal cord lesions (CSLs) in people with MS (pwMS) undergoing routine brain and cervical SC-MRI for disease monitoring and determine the factors associated with the development of new CSLs and their prognostic value.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 1576 pwMS who underwent follow-up 3T brain and cervical SC-MRI over a 9-month period. MRI was reviewed for the presence of new brain lesions (BLs) and CSLs. Clinical records were reviewed for interval relapses between sequential scans and subsequent clinical relapse and disability worsening after the follow-up MRI.

RESULTS

In 1285 pwMS (median interval: 13-14 months) who were clinically stable with respect to relapses, 73 (5.7%) had new CSLs, of which 49 (3.8%) had concomitant new BLs and 24 (1.9%) had new isolated CSLs only. New asymptomatic CSLs were associated with ⩾ 3 prior relapses (p = 0.04), no disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use (p = 0.048), and ⩾ 3 new BLs (p < 0.001); ⩾ 3 new BLs (OR: 7.11, 95% CI: 4.3-11.7, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with new CSLs on multivariable analysis. Having new asymptomatic CSLs was not independently associated with subsequent relapse or disability worsening after the follow-up MRI (median follow-up time of 26 months).

CONCLUSION

Routine brain and cervical SC-MRI detected new isolated CSLs in only < 2% of clinically stable pwMS. Developing new asymptomatic CSLs was associated with concomitant new BLs and did not confer an independent increased risk of relapse or disability worsening. Performing SC-MRI may not be warranted for routine monitoring in most pwMS, and performing only brain MRI may be sufficient to capture the vast majority of clinically silent disease activity.

Assessing treatment response to oral drugs for multiple sclerosis in real-world setting: a MAGNIMS Study

BACKGROUND

The assessment of treatment response is a crucial step for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We explored whether a scoring system developed within the MAGNIMS (MRI in Multiple Sclerosis) network to evaluate treatment response to injectable drugs can be adopted also to oral DMTs.

METHODS

A multicentre dataset of 1200 patients who started three oral DMTs (fingolimod, teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate) was collected within the MAGNIMS network. Disease activity after the first year was classified by the 'MAGNIMS' score based on the combination of relapses (0-≥2) and/or new T2 lesions (<3 or ≥3) on brain MRI. We explored the association of this score with the following 3-year outcomes: (1) confirmed disability worsening (CDW); (2) treatment failure (TFL); (3) relapse count between years 1 and 3. The additional value of contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) and lesion location was explored.

RESULTS

At 3 years, 160 patients experienced CDW: 12% of them scored '0' (reference), 18% scored '1' (HR=1.82, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.76, p=0.005) and 37% scored '2' (HR=2.74, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.36, p=0.003) at 1 year. The analysis of other outcomes provided similar findings. Considering the location of new T2 lesions (supratentorial vs infratentorial/spinal cord) and the presence of CELs improved the prediction of CDW and TFL, respectively, in patients with minimal MRI activity alone (one or two new T2 lesions).

CONCLUSIONS

Early relapses and substantial MRI activity in the first year of treatment are associated with worse short-term outcomes in patients treated with some of the oral DMTs.

The added value of spinal cord lesions to disability accrual in multiple sclerosis

Spinal cord MRI is not routinely performed for multiple sclerosis (MS) monitoring. Here, we explored whether spinal cord MRI activity offers any added value over brain MRI activity for clinical outcomes prediction in MS. This is a retrospective, monocentric study including 830 MS patients who underwent longitudinal brain and spinal cord MRI [median follow-up 7 years (range: < 1-26)]. According to the presence (or absence) of MRI activity defined as at least one new T2 lesion and/or gadolinium (Gd) enhancing lesion, each scan was classified as: (i) brain MRI negative/spinal cord MRI negative; (ii) brain MRI positive/spinal cord MRI negative; (iii) brain MRI negative/spinal cord MRI positive; (iv) brain MRI positive/spinal cord MRI positive. The relationship between such patterns and clinical outcomes was explored by multivariable regression models. When compared with the presence of brain MRI activity alone: (i) Gd + lesions in the spine alone and both in the brain and in the spinal cord were associated with an increased risk of concomitant relapses (OR = 4.1, 95% CI 2.4-7.1, p < 0.001 and OR = 4.9, 95% CI 4.6-9.1, p < 0.001, respectively); (ii) new T2 lesions at both locations were associated with an increased risk of disability worsening (HR = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.0-2.1, p = 0.05). Beyond the presence of brain MRI activity, new spinal cord lesions are associated with increased risk of both relapses and disability worsening. In addition, 16.1% of patients presented asymptomatic, isolated spinal cord activity (Gd + lesions). Monitoring MS with spinal cord MRI may allow a more accurate risk stratification and treatment optimization.

How to measure the treatment response in progressive multiple sclerosis: Current perspectives and limitations in clinical settings'

New treatment options are available for active progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), including primary and secondary progressive forms. Several pieces of evidence have recently suggested a "window of beneficial treatment opportunities," principally in the early stages of progression. However, for progressive MS, which is characterised by an inevitable tendency to get worse, it is crucial to redefine the "response to treatment" beyond the concept of "no evidence of disease activity" (NEDA-3), which was initially conceived to evaluate disease outcomes in relapsing-remitting form, albeit it is currently applied to all MS cases in clinical practice. This review examines the current perspectives and limitations in assessing the effectiveness of DMTs and disease outcomes in progressive MS, the current criteria applied in defining the response to DMTs, and the strengths and limitations of clinical scales and tools for evaluating MS evolution and patient perception. Additionally, the impact of age and comorbidities on the assessment of MS outcomes was examined.

The independent contribution of brain, spinal cord and gadolinium MRI in treatment decision in multiple sclerosis: A population-based retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord and gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide additional information to brain MRI to determine prognosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the real-world impact of routine use of brain MRI with spinal cord and/or Gd sequences is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of brain, spinal cord and Gd MRI on treatment decisions in MS.

METHODS

In this 2015-2020 population-based study, we performed a retrospective analysis on MS patients resident in the Campania Region (South Italy), with disease modifying treatment (DMT) prescription (n = 6,161). DMTs were classified as platform (dimethyl fumarate, glatiramer acetate, interferon-beta, peg-interferon-beta, teriflunomide), or high-efficacy (alemtuzumab, cladribine, fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab). We evaluated the association between binary MRI variables and switch from platform to high-efficacy DMT using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The likelihood of switch from platform to high-efficacy DMT was 47% higher when including post-Gd acquisitions to brain and/or spinal cord MRI, 59% higher when including spinal cord acquisitions to brain MRI, and 132% higher when including any MRI compared with no MRI (all p < 0.05). The likelihood of switch to high-efficacy DMT decreased over time from treatment start.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that spinal cord and Gd MRI acquisitions can provide relevant information to influence subsequent treatment decisions, especially in early treatment phases, compared with stand-alone brain MRI.

Predictive MRI Biomarkers in MS—A Critical Review

Background and Objectives: In this critical review, we explore the potential use of MRI measurements as prognostic biomarkers in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, for both conventional measurements and more novel techniques such as magnetization transfer, diffusion tensor, and proton spectroscopy MRI. Materials and Methods: All authors individually and comprehensively reviewed each of the aspects listed below in PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. Results: There are numerous MRI metrics that have been proven by clinical studies to hold important prognostic value for MS patients, most of which can be readily obtained from standard 1.5T MRI scans. Conclusions: While some of these parameters have passed the test of time and seem to be associated with a reliable predictive power, some are still better interpreted with caution. We hope this will serve as a reminder of how vast a resource we have on our hands in this versatile tool—it is up to us to make use of it.