Efficacy of oral UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy to curative resection of colorectal cancer: multicenter prospective randomized trial

Recurrence-free survival dynamics following adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colorectal cancer: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Several cytotoxic chemotherapies have demonstrated efficacy in improving recurrence-free survival (RFS) following resection of Stage II-IV colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the temporal dynamics of response to such adjuvant therapy have not been systematically quantified.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Trials, Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science were queried from database inception to February 23, 2023 for Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where there was a significant difference in RFS between adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery only arms. Summary data were extracted from published Kaplan-Meier curves using DigitizeIT. Absolute differences in RFS event rates were compared at matched intervals using multiple paired t-tests.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1469 manuscripts. After screening, 18 RCTs were eligible (14 Stage II/III; 4 Stage IV), inclusive of 16,682 patients. In the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy, the greatest rate of recurrence was observed in the first year (mean RFS event rate; 0-0.5 years: 0.22 ± 0.21; 0.5-1 years: 0.20 ± 0.09). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significant decreases in the RFS event rates for the intervals 0-0.5 years (0.09 ± 0.09 vs. 0.22 ± 0.21, p < 0.001) and 0.5-1 years (0.14 ± 0.11 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09, p = 0.001) after randomization, but not at later intervals (1-5 years). In Stage IV trials, RFS event rates significantly differed for the interval 0-0.5 years (p = 0.012), corresponding with adjuvant treatment durations of 6 months. In Stage II/III trials, which included therapies of 6-24 months duration, there were marked differences in the RFS event rates between surgery and chemotherapy arms for the intervals 0-0.5 years (p < 0.001) and 0.5-1 years (p < 0.001) with smaller differences in the RFS event rates for the intervals 1-2 years (p = 0.012) and 2-3 years (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

In a systematic review of positive RCTs comparing adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery alone for Stage II-IV CRC, observed RFS improvements were driven by early divergences that occurred primarily during active cytotoxic chemotherapy. Late recurrence dynamics were not influenced by adjuvant therapy use. Such observations may have implications for the use of chemotherapy for micrometastatic clones detectable by cell-free DNA-based methodologies.

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with recurrence or cancer-specific death following curative resection for stage III rectal cancer: a competing risks analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage III rectal cancer (RC) has been argued based on evidence from its use in colon cancer. Previous trials have analysed disease-free and overall survivals as endpoints, rather than disease recurrence. This study compares the competing risks incidences of recurrence and cancer-specific death between patients who did and did not receive AC for stage III RC.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for stage III RC (1995-2019) at Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia, were studied. AC was considered following multidisciplinary discussion. Primary outcome measures were the competing risks incidences of disease recurrence and cancer-specific death. Associations between these outcomes and use of AC (and other variables) were tested by regression modelling.

RESULTS

Some 338 patients (213 male, mean age 64.4 years [SD12.7]) were included. Of these, 208 received AC. The use of AC was associated with resection year (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.74, 95%CI 1.27-2.38); age ≥75 years (aOR0.04, 95%CI 0.02-0.12); peripheral vascular disease (aOR0.08, 95%CI 0.01-0.74); and postoperative abdomino-pelvic abscess (aOR0.23, 95%CI 0.07-0.81). One hundred fifty-seven patients (46.5%) were diagnosed with recurrence; death due to RC occurred in 119 (35.2%). After adjustment for the competing risk of non-cancer death, neither recurrence nor RC-specific death was associated with AC (HR0.97, 95%CI 0.70-1.33 and HR0.72, 95%CI 0.50-1.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study found no significant difference in either recurrence or cancer-specific death between patients who did and did not receive AC following curative resection for stage III RC.

Metronomic chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil following radical resection in stage II colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage II colorectal cancer has a relatively good prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery is the standard treatment for stage III colorectal cancer but is not routinely recommended for all stage II colorectal cancer patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, treatment results, and prognostic factors in stage II colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery with/without oral tegafur-uracil (UFT).

METHODS

We included stage II colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery and were followed up for at least 5 years after surgery at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2012. Excluding patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy other than UFT, and those lost follow-up, patients treated with UFT (UFT group) and those without adjuvant therapy (surgery alone group) were analyzed for their clinical outcomes and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were recruited. Of these, 104 (44.64%) underwent only surgery while 129 (55.36%) received adjuvant chemotherapy with oral UFT following surgery. Recurrence or death occurred within 5 years in 60 patients (25.75%), with a significant difference between the surgery alone (36/104, 34.62%) and UFT groups (24/129, 18.61%) (p = 0.007). The UFT group demonstrated significantly superior 5-year disease-free (p = 0.003) and overall survival rates (p = 0.001), respectively. Patient age of ≤35.3 or ˃72.7 years, UFT duration of <486.8 days, 7.1 cm < tumor size ≤13.2 cm, number of harvested lymph nodes ≤13.5, and mucinous adenocarcinoma were associated with poorer 5-year overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The present data suggest that UFT following curative surgery may be associated with lower recurrence and improved survival in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Current evidence and recommendations for clinical practice

While adjuvant chemotherapy is an established treatment for pathological stage II and especially stage III colon cancer, its role in the multimodal management of rectal cancer remains controversial. As a result, there is substantial variation in the use of this treatment in clinical practice. Even among centres and physicians who consider adjuvant chemotherapy as a standard treatment, notable heterogeneity exists with regard to patient selection criteria and chemotherapy regimens. The controversy around this topic is confirmed by the lack of full consensus among national and international clinical guidelines. While most of the clinical trials do not support the contention that adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival outcomes if pre-operative (chemo)radiotherapy is also given, these suffer from many limitations that preclude drawing definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, in the era of evidence-based medicine, physicians should be guided by the available data and refrain from extrapolating results of adjuvant colon cancer trials to inform treatment decisions for rectal cancer. Patients should be informed of the evidence gap, be given the opportunity to carefully discuss pros and cons of all the possible management options and be empowered in the decision making. In this article we review the available evidence on adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer and propose a risk-adapted decisional algorithm that largely relies on informed patient preferences.

Prognostic Impact of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Stage I-II Rectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation and immune response play crucial roles in tumor growth; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a known systemic inflammatory scoring system. Previous studies have reported that NLR is a prognostic biomarker in various human cancers. The aim of this study was to determine whether the NLR predicts tumor recurrence in patients with stage I-II rectal cancer after curative resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 130 consecutive patients with stage I-II rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between January 2006 and March 2015 at our institution without any preoperative treatment. We investigated whether clinicopathologic factors including NLR were associated with cancer recurrence after curative surgery.

RESULTS

There were four cases (3.1%) of cancer-specific deaths and 16 cases (12.3%) of recurrence; the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 85.6%. NLR, pathologic T-category, and lymphatic invasion were significantly associated with disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis further showed that these three factors were independently associated with disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative NLR could predict tumor relapse in stage I-II rectal cancer and might be a useful biomarker for predicting recurrence in patients undergoing curative resection.

5-Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves the clinical outcomes of patients with lymphovascular invasion of upper urinary tract cancer and low expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) by urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UC-UUT) is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. However, a high proportion of patients with UC-UUT are unable to receive the recommended doses of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy due to advanced age or renal dysfunction resulting from nephroureterectomy. Tegafur-uracil is an oral form of 5-fluorouracil whose efficacy is influenced by the activities of enzymes associated with its metabolism, such as dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), orotatephosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT) and thymidylate synthase (TS). The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for UC-UUT with LVI, and to assess the expression of enzymes associated with 5-fluorouracil metabolism as promising biomarkers of therapy efficacy. The present study retrospectively investigated 52 cases of UC-UUT. Following nephroureterectomy, tegafur-uracil was administered to 15 out of 30 patients with LVI who were not eligible for cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Levels of DPD, OPRT and TS expression in tumor specimens were determined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and their associations with the efficacy of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy were analyzed. The levels of DPD, OPRT and TS expression were not associated with pathological factors or outcome, although a higher expression of TS was associated with a poorer outcome. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy significantly improved the outcome of patients with lower DPD expression. However, the levels of OPRT and TS expression did not influence therapeutic efficacy. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy appears to be effective for lymphovascular-invasive UC-UUT in patients with lower DPD expression.

Cost minimization comparison of oral UFT/leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer in Taiwan

AIM

Oral uracil-tegafur/leucovorin (UFT/LV) and intravenous 5-fluorouracil (FU)/LV are common adjuvant therapies for Stages II and III colorectal cancer. This study aims to determine the most cost-effective treatment alternative between UFT/LV and 5-FU/LV in Stages II and III colorectal cancer from Taiwan's National Health Insurance perspective.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The costs were referenced directly from the National Health Insurance reimbursement price. Chemotherapy regimen considered for the cost analysis calculation was adapted from NSABP-C-06 study, and, a time saving calculation was also included. In addition, we compare the treatment outcome.

RESULT

A total cost saving of US$3620.80-$3709.16 per patient per treatment was achieved with the UFT/LV treatment. UFT/LV provides the comparable outcome to 5-FU/LV.

CONCLUSION

UFT/LV was the more cost-effective treatment as adjuvant chemotherapy.

A randomised-controlled trial of 1-year adjuvant chemotherapy with oral tegafur-uracil versus surgery alone in stage II colon cancer: SACURA trial. Eur J Cancer. 2018;96:54-63. [PMID: 29677641 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.009]

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer is still controversial. The SACURA trial is a randomised-controlled study evaluating the superiority of 1-year adjuvant treatment with oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) to surgery alone for stage II colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to the surgery-alone group or UFT group (UFT at 500-600 mg/day for 5 days, followed by 2-day rest, for 1 year). The primary end-point was disease-free survival (DFS). Target sample size was 2000, determined with one-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.9 and assumed hazard ratio (HR) 0.729.

RESULTS

A total of 1982 patients (997 in the surgery-alone group and 985 in the UFT group) were analysed. Median follow-up was 69.5 months, median age was 66 years and for stage IIA/IIB/IIC, the distribution was 84%/13%/3%. The 5-year DFS rate was 78.4% in the surgery-alone group and 80.2% in the UFT group. The HR for DFS was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.10; p = 0.31); superiority of UFT was not demonstrated. Approximately 9% of patients experienced second cancers, which consist 40.7% of the DFS events. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates of the surgery-alone and UFT group were 84.6% and 87.2% (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.04) and 94.3% and 94.5% (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31), respectively. Subgroup analysis failed to disclose superiority in prognosis of adding UFT to the patients with risk factors for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Superiority of 1-year adjuvant UFT over surgery alone was not demonstrated in stage II colon cancer. Patients with risk factors for recurrence did not benefit from UFT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials. Gov. #NCT00392899.

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stages II and III colon cancer after complete resection: a clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

Updated practice guidelines on adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected colon cancer are lacking. In 2008, Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care developed a guideline on adjuvant therapy for stages ii and iii colon cancer. With newer regimens being assessed in this patient population and older agents being either abandoned because of non-effectiveness or replaced by agents that are more efficacious, a full update of the original guideline was undertaken.

METHODS

Literature searches (January 1987 to August 2015) of medline, embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted; in addition, abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the European Society for Medical Oncology, and the European Cancer Congress were reviewed (the latter for January 2007 to August 2015). A practice guideline was drafted that was then scrutinized by internal and external reviewers whose comments were incorporated into the final guideline.

RESULTS

Twenty-six unique reports of eighteen randomized controlled trials and thirteen unique reports of twelve meta-analyses or pooled analyses were included in the evidence base. The 5 recommendations developed included 3 for stage ii colon cancer and 2 for stage iii colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with completely resected stage iii colon cancer should be offered adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5fu)-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin (based on definitive data for improvements in survival and disease-free survival). Patients with resected stage ii colon cancer without "high-risk" features should not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with "high-risk" features, 5fu-based chemotherapy with or without oxaliplatin should be offered, although no clinical trials have been conducted to conclusively demonstrate the same benefits seen in stage iii colon cancer.

Possible role of thymidine phosphorylase in gynecological tumors as an individualized treatment strategy

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is structurally similar to platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, and it activates 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrugs and also promotes angiogenesis. In the present study, the possibility of using TP expression as a biomarker for 5-FU prodrugs, and the significance of TP as an angiogenic factor, were investigated in patients with gynecological tumors. The subjects enrolled in the study were 188 patients with gynecological tumors who provided informed consent and underwent tumor resection at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Tokai University Hospital between February 2002 and January 2010. Measurement of the enzymatic activity of TP and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of microvessels by monochrome imaging, western blotting and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were performed. The mean TP activity and the TP/DPD ratio were increased in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (306.9 and 2.2 U/mg protein, respectively) and adenosquamous carcinoma (317.6 and 1.4 U/mg protein, respectively) compared with benign tumors and other malignancies, including endometrial (uterine) carcinoma, ovarian serous adenocarcinoma and ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma. However, these parameters were also elevated in other histological types of cancer such as clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary (115.2 and 2.1 U/mg protein, respectively), in which the microvessel area was the largest of all the histological types analyzed. Since high TP expression and a high TP/DPD ratio were identified in other tumors besides cervical cancer, it is possible that patients for whom 5-FU prodrugs are indicated could be selected appropriately if their TP activity is determined and their TP expression is analyzed by IHC prior to initiation of the treatment.

Recent advances in multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer

Surgery is a major treatment option for rectal cancer, and total mesorectal excision has been demonstrated to be advantageous in terms of oncological outcome and thus has been the standard surgical approach. Radiotherapy before or after radical surgery is the optimal treatment to control local recurrence of advanced rectal cancer. To date, in many countries, the combination of neoadjuvant concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy is considered the standard therapy. A more recent interest in neoadjuvant therapy has been the use of oxaliplatin or targeted agents for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, despite many trials of oxaliplatin and targeted agents, 5-FU-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy has remained the only standard treatment option. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or induction chemotherapy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may further improve patient survival, as some clinical studies recently indicated. In Japan, neoadjuvant therapy is not the standard treatment method, because surgery with lateral lymph node dissection is usually performed and this type of surgery may reduce recurrence rate as does radiation therapy. The phase III study to evaluate the oncological effect of the Japanese standard operation (mesorectal excision, ME) with lateral lymph node dissection in comparison with ME alone for clinical stage II and III lower rectal cancer is currently ongoing.

Review on adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer - why do treatment guidelines differ so much?

BACKGROUND

The use of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is controversial for rectal adenocarcinoma. Both international and national guidelines display a great span varying from recommending no adjuvant chemotherapy at all, over single drug 5-fluororuacil (5-FU), to combinations of 5-FU/oxaliplatin.

METHODS

A review of the literature was made identifying 24 randomized controlled trials on adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer based on about 10 000 patients. The trials were subdivided into a number of clinically relevant subgroups.

RESULTS

As regards patients treated with preoperative (chemo) radiotherapy, four randomized studies were found where use of adjuvant chemotherapy showed no benefit in survival. Three trials were found in which a subset of patients received preoperative (chemo) radiotherapy. Two of these trials showed a statistically significant benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty trials were identified in which the patients did not receive preoperative (chemo) radiotherapy, including five Asian studies in which a statistically significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the data found did not support the use of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients already treated with preoperative (chemo) radiotherapy. For patients not treated preoperatively, several studies support the use of single agent 5-FU chemotherapy. Treatment guidelines seem to differ according to if preoperative chemoradiation is considered of importance for use of adjuvant chemotherapy and if adjuvant colon cancer studies are considered transferrable to rectal cancer patients regardless of the molecular differences.

Systematic Review: Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with respect to Stage of Disease

Background. Recent meta-analysis of 21 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) supports the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for nonmetastatic rectal carcinoma. In order to define a subgroup of patients who can potentially benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, this study aims to review trials investigating adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to stage of disease in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who had undergone surgery for cure (stage II and stage III). Methods. We searched electronic information sources to identify randomised trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stages II and III rectal cancer with overall survival or disease-free survival as outcomes. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network notes on methodology were used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. Random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results. Eight studies reporting total of 5527 patients were selected for analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival and overall survival compared to surgery alone in both stage II and stage III cancer. Conclusions. This study indicates that both stage II and stage III rectal cancer patients may benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who already had neoadjuvant chemoradiation still remain unknown.

Total number of lymph node metastases is a more significant risk factor for poor prognosis than positive lateral lymph node metastasis

PURPOSE

Lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) along the iliac vessels are an important indicator of local recurrence; however, we are unaware of any study that investigates whether the number of LLN metastases influences the prognosis of patients with lower rectal cancer.

METHOD

We analyzed retrospectively the records of 154 patients who underwent radical resection of T1-4 lower rectal adenocarcinoma at a single institution.

RESULTS

Among the 88.3 % of patients who underwent LLN dissection, 13 (8.4 %) had LLN metastasis. The Cox proportional hazard model indicated that sex, histological grade, lymphatic or venous invasion, and LLN metastasis were not significantly associated with tumor recurrence, whereas tumor depth and more than three lymph node metastases were risk factors for recurrence (p = 0.002 and p = 0.02, respectively). Of the 13 patients with LLN metastasis, 6 whose mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) had been well dissected and examined did not have MLN metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of one or two LLN metastases in patients who have undergone LLN dissection with surgery for lower rectal cancer is not associated with poor prognosis. The number of LLN metastases is a more significant risk factor for poor prognosis.

Safety analysis of two different regimens of uracil-tegafur plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and III colon cancer in a phase III trial comparing 6 with 18 months of treatment: JFMC33-0502 trial

Purpose

The JFMC33-0502 trial is a phase III clinical study designed to determine the most appropriate duration of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil–tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with stage IIB or III colon cancer. We report the interim results of preplanned safety analyses.

Methods

Patients with stage IIB or III colon cancer who had undergone curative resection were randomly assigned to receive UFT (300 mg/m²) plus leucovorin (75 mg/day) for 6 months (control group, 4 weeks of treatment followed by a 1-week rest, five courses) or for 18 months (study group, 5 days of treatment followed by a 2-day rest, 15 courses). Treatment status and safety were evaluated.

Results

A total of 1,071 patients were enrolled, and 1,063 were included in safety analyses. Treatment completion rate at 6 months was 74.0 % in the control group and 76.7 % in the study group. Treatment completion rate in the study group at 18 months was 56.0 %. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 75.3 % in the control group and 77.6 % in the study group. The incidences of grade 3 or higher AEs were low in both groups. During the first 6 months, the incidences of the subjective AEs were significantly lower in the study group.

Conclusions

Oral UFT plus leucovorin given by either dosage schedule is a very safe regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy. In particular, 5 days of treatment followed by a 2-day rest was a useful treatment option from the viewpoint of toxicity even when given for longer than 6 months.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-014-2461-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sub-classification of Stage II colorectal cancer based on clinicopathological risk factors for recurrence

Purpose

To make a Stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) sub-classification based on clinicopathological factors.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 422 patients with Stage II CRC, who underwent curative surgery with dissection of more than 12 lymph nodes. We used the logistic regression analysis or model and Cox’s proportional hazard regression model for analysis.

Results

Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p = 0.0057), macroscopic type (p = 0.0316), and depth of invasion (p = 0.0401) were extracted as independent risk factors for recurrence, whereas the preoperative CEA level (p = 0.0045) and depth of invasion (p = 0.0395) were extracted as independent predictors of 5-year disease-free survival. We defined depth of invasion (pT4) and the preoperative CEA level (abnormal) as risk factors for recurrence, and classified Grade A as a normal CEA level regardless of depth invasion, Grade B as depth of invasion to pT3 and an elevated CEA level, and Grade C as depth of invasion to pT4 and an elevated CEA level. There were significant differences in cumulative 5-year disease-free survival rates among each grade (Grade A vs. Grade B, p = 0.0474; Grade A vs. Grade C, p < 0.0001; Grade B vs. Grade C, p = 0.0134).

Conclusion

The sub-classification of Stage II CRC, according not only to depth of invasion but also to preoperative CEA level, is important for predicting the prognosis.

Study protocol of the B-CAST study: a multicenter, prospective cohort study investigating the tumor biomarkers in adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer is internationally accepted as standard treatment with established efficacy. Several oral fluorouracil (5-FU) derivatives with different properties are available in Japan, but which drug is the most appropriate for each patient has not been established. Although efficacy prediction of 5-FU derivatives using expression of 5-FU activation/metabolism enzymes in tumors has been studied, it has not been clinically applied.

METHODS/DESIGN

The B-CAST study is a multicenter, prospective cohort study aimed to identify the patients who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy with each 5-FU regimen, through evaluating the relationship between tumor biomarker expression and treatment outcome. The frozen tumor specimens of patients with stage III colon cancer who receives postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy are examined. Protein expression of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). mRNA expression of TP, DPD, thymidylate synthase (TS) and orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT) are evaluated using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The patients' clinical data reviewed are as follow: demographic and pathological characteristics, regimen, drug doses and treatment duration of adjuvant therapy, types and severity of adverse events, disease free survival, relapse free survival and overall survival. Then, relationships among the protein/mRNA expression, clinicopathological characteristics and the treatment outcomes are analyzed for each 5-FU derivative.

DISCUSSION

A total of 2,128 patients from the 217 institutions were enrolled between April 2009 and March 2012. The B-CAST study demonstrated that large-scale, multicenter translational research using frozen samples was feasible when the sample shipment and Web-based data collection were well organized. The results of the study will identify the predictors of benefit from each 5-FU derivative, and will contribute to establish the "personalized therapy" in adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00918827, UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000002013.

Study protocol of the SACURA trial: a randomized phase III trial of efficacy and safety of UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer is internationally accepted as standard treatment with established efficacy, but the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer remains controversial. The major Western guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for "high-risk stage II" cancer, but this is not clearly defined and the efficacy has not been confirmed.

METHODS/DESIGN

SACURA trial is a multicenter randomized phase III study which aims to evaluate the superiority of 1-year adjuvant treatment with UFT to observation without any adjuvant treatment after surgery for stage II colon cancer in a large population, and to identify "high-risk factors of recurrence/death" in stage II colon cancer and predictors of efficacy and adverse events of the chemotherapy. Patients aged between 20 and 80 years with curatively resected stage II colon cancer are randomly assigned to a observation group or UFT adjuvant therapy group (UFT at 500-600 mg/day as tegafur in 2 divided doses after meals for 5 days, followed by 2-day rest. This 1-week treatment cycle is repeated for 1 year). The patients are followed up for 5 years until recurrence or death. Treatment delivery and adverse events are entered into a web-based case report form system every 3 months. The target sample size is 2,000 patients. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and incidence and severity of adverse events. In an additional translational study, the mRNA expression of 5-FU-related enzymes, microsatellite instability and chromosomal instability, and histopathological factors including tumor budding are assessed to evaluate correlation with recurrences, survivals and adverse events.

DISCUSSION

A total of 2,024 patients were enrolled from October 2006 to July 2010. The results of this study will provide important information that help to improve the therapeutic strategy for stage II colon cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00392899.

Feasibility study of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and compliance of 1-year treatment with S-1 in patients with stage II/III resectable colorectal cancer.

METHODS

S-1 was administered orally in two divided doses daily. The dose was assigned according to body surface area (BSA) as follows: BSA <1.25 m(2), 80 mg/day; BSA ≥1.25 to <1.5 m(2), 100 mg/day; and BSA ≥1.5 m(2), 120 mg/day. S-1 was given for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 14-day rest. The study objects were the rate of completion of treatment as planned at 1 year, the ratio of the actually administered dose to the planned dose at 1 year, and the total number of days of treatment.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the rate of completion of treatment as planned was 77.7 % (42/54 patients), and the ratio of the actually administered dose to the planned dose was 82.9 %. The mean and median total numbers of days of treatment were 209 and 252, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity (watery eyes) occurred in only 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy had acceptable compliance, safety, and efficacy in patients with colorectal cancer. S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is considered a possible standard treatment regimen for colorectal cancer.

Feasibility of 5-days-on/2-days-off UFT/leucovorin in post-operative long-term adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Previous clinical studies have shown that the oral uracil/tegafur (UFT)/leucovorin (LV) regimen, in which the drugs are taken for 28 consecutive days every 35 days, is equivalent to an infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV regimen for the treatment of colorectal cancer. A 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule for UFT/LV has been proposed as the same schedule for UFT has been reported to be safe and have good compliance. However, few studies have been performed with regards to the feasibility of the UFT/LV regimen. The results of the 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule were compared with those of the consecutive schedule in adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients were treated with the 5-days-on/ 2-days-off schedule of UFT (300 mg/m(2)/day)/LV (75 mg/body/day), and another 12 patients were treated with the consecutive schedule. In the 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule, 24 of 28 patients (86%) received all the scheduled doses. In the consecutive schedule, 10 of 12 patients (83%) received all the scheduled doses. The mean relative dose intensities for the 5-days-on/2-days-off and consecutive schedules were 0.92 and 0.87, respectively. The toxicities were milder in the 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule compared with the consecutive schedule. The disease-free survival in patients with the 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule tended (P=0.13) to be longer compared with the consecutive schedule. The results of the present study indicate that the 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule of UFT/LV may be feasible and cause no severe toxicities in long-term adjuvant chemotherapy.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in the Western world. Apart from surgery - which remains the mainstay of treatment for resectable primary tumours - postoperative (i.e., adjuvant) chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based regimens is now the standard treatment in Dukes' C (TNM stage III) colon tumours i.e. tumours with metastases in the regional lymph nodes but no distant metastases. In contrast, the evidence for recommendations of adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer is sparse. In Europe it is generally acknowledged that locally advanced rectal tumours receive preoperative (i.e., neoadjuvant) downstaging by radiotherapy (or chemoradiotion), whereas in the US postoperative chemoradiotion is considered the treatment of choice in all Dukes' C rectal cancers. Overall, no universal consensus exists on the adjuvant treatment of surgically resectable rectal carcinoma; moreover, no formal systematic review and meta-analysis has been so far performed on this subject.

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature from 1975 until March 2011 in order to quantitatively summarize the available evidence regarding the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with surgically resectable rectal cancer. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

SEARCH METHODS

CCCG standard search strategy in defined databases with the following supplementary search. 1. Rect* or colorect* - 2. Cancer or carcinom* or adenocarc* or neoplasm* or tumour - 3. Adjuv* - 4. Chemother* - 5. Postoper*

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer who received no adjuvant chemotherapy with those receiving any postoperative chemotherapy regimen.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data and a third author performed an independent search for verification. The main outcome measure was the hazard ratio (HR) between the risk of event between the treatment arm (adjuvant chemotherapy) and the control arm (no adjuvant chemotherapy). The survival data were either entered directly in RevMan or extrapolated from Kaplan-Meier plots and then entered in RevMan. Due to expected clinical heterogeneity a random effects model was used for creating the pooled estimates of treatment efficacy.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 21 eligible RCTs were identified and used for meta-analysis purposes. Overall, 16,215 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled, 9,785 being affected with rectal carcinoma. Considering patients with rectal cancer only, 4,854 cases were randomized to receive potentially curative surgery of the primary tumour plus adjuvant chemotherapy and 4,367 to receive surgery plus observation. The mean number of patients enrolled was 466 (range: 54-1,243 cases). 11 RCTs had been performed in Western countries and 10 in Japan. All trials used fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (no modern drugs - such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan or biological agents - were tested).Overall survival (OS) data were available in 21 RCTs and the data available for meta-analysis regarded 9,221 patients: of these, 4854 patients were randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy (treatment arm) and 4,367 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (control arm). The meta-analysis of these RCTs showed a significant reduction in the risk of death (17%) among patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy as compared to those undergoing observation (HR=0.83, CI: 0.76-0.91). Between-study heterogeneity was moderate (I-squared=30%) but significant (P=0.09) at the 10% alpha level.Disease-free survival (DFS) data were reported in 20 RCTs, and the data suitable for meta-analysis included 8,530 patients. Of these, 4,515 patients were randomized to postoperative chemotherapy (treatment arm) and 4,015 patients received no postoperative chemotherapy (control arm). The meta-analysis of these RCTs showed a reduction in the risk of disease recurrence (25%) among patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy as compared to those undergoing observation (HR=0.75, CI: 0.68-0.83). Between-study heterogeneity was moderate (I-squared=41%) but significant (P=0.03).While analyzing both OS and DFS data, sensitivity analyses did not find any difference in treatment effect based on trial sample size or geographical region (Western vs Japanese). Available data were insufficient to investigate on the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy separately in different TNM stages in terms of both OS and DFS. No plausible source of heterogeneity was formally identified, although variability in treatment regimens and TNM stages of enrolled patients might have played a significant role in the difference of reported results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis support the use of 5-FU based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients undergoing apparently radical surgery for non-metastatic rectal carcinoma. Available data do not allow us to define whether the efficacy of this treatment is highest in one specific TNM stage. The implementation of modern anti-cancer agents in the adjuvant setting is warranted to improve the results shown by this meta-analysis. Randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant therapy are also needed in order to define the role of postoperative chemotherapy in the multimodal treatment of resectable rectal cancer.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in the Western world. Apart from surgery - which remains the mainstay of treatment for resectable primary tumours - postoperative (i.e., adjuvant) chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based regimens is now the standard treatment in Dukes' C (TNM stage III) colon tumours i.e. tumours with metastases in the regional lymph nodes but no distant metastases. In contrast, the evidence for recommendations of adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer is sparse. In Europe it is generally acknowledged that locally advanced rectal tumours receive preoperative (i.e., neoadjuvant) downstaging by radiotherapy (or chemoradiotion), whereas in the US postoperative chemoradiotion is considered the treatment of choice in all Dukes' C rectal cancers. Overall, no universal consensus exists on the adjuvant treatment of surgically resectable rectal carcinoma; moreover, no formal systematic review and meta-analysis has been so far performed on this subject.

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic review of the scientific literature from 1975 until March 2011 in order to quantitatively summarize the available evidence regarding the impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with surgically resectable rectal cancer. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

SEARCH METHODS

CCCG standard search strategy in defined databases with the following supplementary search. 1. Rect* or colorect* - 2. Cancer or carcinom* or adenocarc* or neoplasm* or tumour - 3. Adjuv* - 4. Chemother* - 5. Postoper*

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer who received no adjuvant chemotherapy with those receiving any postoperative chemotherapy regimen.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data and a third author performed an independent search for verification. The main outcome measure was the hazard ratio (HR) between the risk of event between the treatment arm (adjuvant chemotherapy) and the control arm (no adjuvant chemotherapy). The survival data were either entered directly in RevMan or extrapolated from Kaplan-Meier plots and then entered in RevMan. Due to expected clinical heterogeneity a random effects model was used for creating the pooled estimates of treatment efficacy.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 21 eligible RCTs were identified and used for meta-analysis purposes. Overall, 16,215 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled, 9,785 being affected with rectal carcinoma. Considering patients with rectal cancer only, 4,854 cases were randomized to receive potentially curative surgery of the primary tumour plus adjuvant chemotherapy and 4,367 to receive surgery plus observation. The mean number of patients enrolled was 466 (range: 54-1,243 cases). 11 RCTs had been performed in Western countries and 10 in Japan. All trials used fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (no modern drugs - such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan or biological agents - were tested).Overall survival (OS) data were available in 21 RCTs and the data available for meta-analysis regarded 9,221 patients: of these, 4854 patients were randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy (treatment arm) and 4,367 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (control arm). The meta-analysis of these RCTs showed a significant reduction in the risk of death (17%) among patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy as compared to those undergoing observation (HR=0.83, CI: 0.76-0.91). Between-study heterogeneity was moderate (I-squared=30%) but significant (P=0.09) at the 10% alpha level.Disease-free survival (DFS) data were reported in 20 RCTs, and the data suitable for meta-analysis included 8,530 patients. Of these, 4,515 patients were randomized to postoperative chemotherapy (treatment arm) and 4,015 patients received no postoperative chemotherapy (control arm). The meta-analysis of these RCTs showed a reduction in the risk of disease recurrence (25%) among patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy as compared to those undergoing observation (HR=0.75, CI: 0.68-0.83). Between-study heterogeneity was moderate (I-squared=41%) but significant (P=0.03).While analyzing both OS and DFS data, sensitivity analyses did not find any difference in treatment effect based on trial sample size or geographical region (Western vs Japanese). Available data were insufficient to investigate on the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy separately in different TNM stages in terms of both OS and DFS. No plausible source of heterogeneity was formally identified, although variability in treatment regimens and TNM stages of enrolled patients might have played a significant role in the difference of reported results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis support the use of 5-FU based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients undergoing apparently radical surgery for non-metastatic rectal carcinoma. Available data do not allow us to define whether the efficacy of this treatment is highest in one specific TNM stage. The implementation of modern anti-cancer agents in the adjuvant setting is warranted to improve the results shown by this meta-analysis. Randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant therapy are also needed in order to define the role of postoperative chemotherapy in the multimodal treatment of resectable rectal cancer.

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer: a systematic review of 12 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcomes for stage II colorectal cancer remains controversial.

METHODS

The literature was searched for studies published between 1985 and 2010 in which patients with stage II colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone. End points included 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, recurrence, and mortality.

RESULTS

A significant improvement in 5-year overall survival was associated with surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.91) and for stage II rectal cancer (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.86). The 5-year disease-free survival also favored the group of surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98) and for stage II rectal cancer (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.51). For stage II colon cancer, a significant reduction in risk of recurrence was found in favor of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (risk ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colorectal cancer appears to be associated with improved 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival, and reduction in risk of recurrence.

High-risk stage II colon cancer after curative resection

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to clarify which attributes of stage II colon cancer are associated with tumor recurrence and survival after curative resection, and the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed outcomes and clinicopathological characteristics of 1476 patients with stage II colon cancer who underwent curative resection.

RESULTS

Of 1476 patients, 204 (13.8%) developed recurrence. Macroscopic type, serum CA19-9 levels, venous invasion, emergency operation, and postoperative ileus were independently associated with overall recurrence. Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 levels, the number of dissected lymph nodes (LN), sex, age, ACT, emergency operation, venous invasion, and macroscopic type were independently associated with poor prognosis. Prognosis was significantly better in patients who received ACT than in those who did not. Among patients with extensive venous invasion, those with fewer than 13 dissected LNs, male patients, and patients >50 years old, the prognosis was significantly better in patients who received ACT than in those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

ACT for stage II colon cancer is recommended to improve the prognosis of patients with extensive venous invasion, patients with fewer than 13 dissected LNs, patients >50 years old, and male patients, particularly patients with more than two of these risk factors.

Inguinal lymph node metastases are recognized with high frequency in rectal adenocarcinoma invading the dentate line. The histological features at the invasive front may predict inguinal lymph node metastasis

AIM

Inguinal lymph node (ILN) metastasis occurs with high frequency in some of the patients with lower rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for ILN metastasis in patients with low rectal adenocarcinoma.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed 156 patients with lower rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent radical resection (R0) at a single institution.

RESULTS

Twenty-five (16%) patients had a tumour that invaded the dentate line, seven of whom had ILN metastasis. Invasion of the dentate line was significantly associated with a high rate of ILN metastasis, worse prognosis and local recurrence than with a tumour not invading the dentate line (P = 0.03). A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed the histological characteristics at the invading front (Hif) also to be a risk factor for ILN metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Tumours which invade the dentate line have a high rate of ILN metastases and worse cancer specific end-points. The presence of poorly differentiated or mucinous adenocarcinoma components is an indication for bilateral groin irradiation.

Severe tumor budding is a risk factor for lateral lymph node metastasis in early rectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis sometimes occurs in patients with early rectal cancer that has invaded the submucosa (SM) and muscularis propria (MP). This study aims to identify the risk factor(s) for LLN metastasis in such patients.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with pathological SM or MP lower rectal adenocarcinoma, for whom radical resection had been performed at a single institution.

RESULTS

We performed LLN dissection in 52 (80%) patients. The LLN dissection rates in the case of pathological SM and MP tumors were 65.6% and 94.4%, respectively, and the corresponding LLN metastasis rates were 6.9% and 11.1%. Severe tumor budding was found to be a risk factor for LLN metastasis (P = 0.002). Further, of six patients with LLN metastasis, four did not have coincident mesenteric lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION

In rectal cancer that has pathologically invaded SM and MP, LLN metastasis is not negligible. LLN dissection could lower the local recurrence rate of SM and MP rectal cancer. In case LLN dissection is not performed, patients with a high tumor budding grade should be administered adjuvant therapy.

Final results of randomized trials by the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Colorectal Cancer (NSAS-CC)

OBJECTIVE

In the latter 1990s, adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected Stage III colorectal cancer remained controversial in Japan. We conducted two independent randomized controlled trials in patients with Stage III colon and rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone or surgery followed by treatment with UFT (400 mg/m²/day), given for five consecutive days per week for 1 year. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 334 patients with colon cancer and 276 with rectal cancer were enrolled. The patients' characteristics were similar between the UFT group and the Surgery-alone group. There was no significant difference in RFS or OS in colon cancer. In rectal cancer, however, RFS and OS were significantly better in the UFT group than in the Surgery-alone group. The only grade 4 toxicity in the UFT group was diarrhea, occurring in one patient with colon cancer and one patient with rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT is successfully tolerated and improves RFS and OS in patients with Stage III rectal cancer. In colon cancer, the expected benefits were not obtained (hazard ratio = 0.89).

Randomized clinical trials in rectal and anal cancers

This article reviews randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published between April 2001 and November 2008 on the management of patients with rectal cancer. In total, the authors reviewed 78 RCTs on therapy for rectal cancer. Of these, five met the authors' criteria for level 1a evidence. The article discusses the major RCTs and relevant findings that have impacted clinical management most and includes most but not all RCTs on therapy for rectal cancer published during this period.

The role of meta-analysis in cancer clinical trials

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is considered to be the methodology that provides the most solid scientific basis for constructing clinical guidelines. It involves systematically collecting the results of similar studies that were conducted to verify similar medical hypotheses and combining these results statistically. In meta-analysis, targeting only those randomized controlled trials with good comparability also provides the meta-analysis with comparability. With the combining of multiple studies and the increased sample size, meta-analysis provides results with higher clarity than those obtained from a single study. In conventional meta-analyses, in addition to estimating the combined effect, the cause of heterogeneity of the effects among studies is usually explored. If multiple studies reveal homogeneous effects, the overall effect is interpretable and generalizability can be suggested; that is, the results can be reproducible even when the study conditions are slightly modified. On the other hand, if the effect cannot be viewed as homogeneous among the studies, it is difficult to interpret the overall effect obtained from a meta-analysis. From the viewpoints of clarity, comparability, and generalizability, meta-analysis and large-scale clinical trials can provide the most valuable evidence among several possible study designs. In this article, the role of meta-analysis in cancer clinical trials is illustrated with the example of adjuvant therapy with UFT in patients with curatively resected rectal cancer, compared with the example of a large-scale clinical trial using oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur for curatively resected stage III rectal cancer.Br J Cancer. 2008;99:1232-1238. [PMID: 18797469 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604666]

Recently, the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Colorectal Cancer in Japan, a randomised controlled trial of oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) adjuvant therapy for stage III rectal cancer, showed remarkable survival gains, compared with surgery alone. To evaluate value for money of adjuvant UFT therapy, cost-effective analysis was carried out. Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant UFT therapy was carried out from a payer's perspective, compared with surgery alone. Overall survival and relapse-free survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method, up to 5.6 years from randomisation. Costs were estimated from trial data during observation. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using utility score from literature. Beyond observation period, they were simulated by the Boag model combined with the competing risk model. For 5.6-year observation, 10-year follow-up and over lifetime, adjuvant UFT therapy gained 0.50, 0.96 and 2.28 QALYs, and reduced costs by $2457, $1771 and $1843 per person compared with surgery alone, respectively (3% discount rate for both effect and costs). Cost-effectiveness acceptability and net monetary benefit analyses showed the robustness of these results. Economic evaluation of adjuvant UFT therapy showed that this therapy is cost saving and can be considered as a cost-effective treatment universally accepted for wide use in Japan.

Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery. Although adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with stage III disease, there is uncertainty of such benefit in stage II colon cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to better define the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy for patients with stage II colon cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of adjuvant therapy on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Ovid MEDLINE (1986-2007), EMBASE (1980-2007), and EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( to 2007) were searched using the medical headings "colonic neoplasms", "colorectal neoplasms", "adjuvant chemotherapy", "adjuvant radiotherapy" and "immunotherapy", and the text words "colon cancer" and "colonic neoplasms". In addition, proceedings from the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology (1996 to 2004) as well as personal files were searched for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials or meta-analyses containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

:Three reviewers summarized the results of selected studies. The main outcomes of interest were overall and disease-free survival, however, data on toxicity and treatment delivery were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

With regards to the effect of adjuvant therapy on stage II colon cancer, the pooled relative risk ratio for overall survival was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.88, 1.05). With regards to disease-free survival, the pooled relative risk ratio was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.75, 0.92).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no improvement in overall survival in the pooled analysis, we did find that disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer was significantly better with the use of adjuvant therapy. It seems reasonable to discuss the benefits of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with those stage II patients who have high risk features, including obstruction, perforation, inadequate lymph node sampling or T4 disease. The co-morbidities and likelihood of tolerating adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should be considered as well. There exists a need to further define which high-risk features in stage II colon cancer patients should be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy. Also, researchers must continue to search for other therapies which might be more effective, shorter in duration and less toxic than those available today.

UFT (tegafur and uracil) as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for solid tumors (carcinoma of the lung, stomach, colon/rectum, and breast): clinical evidence, mechanism of action, and future direction

UFT (tegafur and uracil) is an oral anticancer drug that has been developed in Japan. Owing to its mild toxicity profile, UFT can be suitable in an adjuvant setting following a complete tumor resection, whereas its direct antitumor effect achieved may be insufficient for advanced unresectable disease. Therefore, a variety of adjuvant chemotherapy trials with UFT have been conducted, and results of well-designed randomized controlled trials have recently shown a survival benefit of postoperative UFT treatment in resected lung, gastric, colorectal, and breast cancer. In the present article, postoperative adjuvant trials with UFT-containing chemotherapy are reviewed, and the mechanism of action and future directions are also discussed.

Endpoints in Adjuvant Treatment Trials: A Systematic Review of the Literature in Colon Cancer and Proposed Definitions for Future Trials

Disease-free survival is increasingly being used as the primary endpoint of most trials testing adjuvant treatments in cancer. Other frequently used endpoints include overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and time to recurrence. These endpoints are often defined differently in different trials in the same type of cancer, leading to a lack of comparability among trials. In this Commentary, we used adjuvant studies in colon cancer as a model to address this issue. In a systematic review of the literature, we identified 52 studies of adjuvant treatment in colon cancer published in 1997-2006 that used eight other endpoints in addition to overall survival. Both the definition of these endpoints and the starting point for measuring time to the events that constituted these endpoints varied widely. A panel of experts on clinical research on colorectal cancer then reached consensus on the definition of each endpoint. Disease-free survival--defined as the time from randomization to any event, irrespective of cause--was considered to be the most informative endpoint for assessing the effect of treatment and therefore the most relevant to clinical practice. The proposed guidelines may add to the quality and cross-comparability of future studies of adjuvant treatments for cancer.

An individual patient data meta-analysis of adjuvant therapy with uracil-tegafur (UFT) in patients with curatively resected rectal cancer

Uracil–Tegafur (UFT), an oral fluorinated pyrimidine chemotherapeutic agent, has been used for adjuvant chemotherapy in curatively resected colorectal cancer patients. Past trials and meta-analyses indicate that it is somewhat effective in extending survival of patients with rectal cancer. The objective of this study was to perform a reappraisal of randomised clinical trials conducted in this field. We designed an individual patient-based meta-analysis of relevant clinical trials to examine the benefit of UFT for curatively resected rectal cancer in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS). We analysed individual patient data of five adjuvant therapy randomised clinical trials for rectal cancer, which met the predetermined inclusion criteria. These five trials had a combined total of 2091 patients, UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy compared to surgery-alone, 5-year follow-up, intention-to-treat-based analytic strategy, and similar endpoints (OS and DFS). In a pooled analysis, UFT had significant advantage over surgery-alone in terms of both OS (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.97; P=0.02) and DFS (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.63–0.84; P<0.0001). This individual patient-based meta-analysis demonstrated that oral UFT significantly improves both OS and DFS in patients with curatively resected rectal cancer.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Uracil–Tegafur for Pathological Stage III Rectal Cancer after Mesorectal Excision with Selective Lateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial*

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant radiotherapy was proved to be effective for local control of rectal cancer even after standardized mesorectal excision, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after such standardized surgery remains to be clarified. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a combination of uracil and tegafur for pathological stage III rectal cancer treated by standardized mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with completely resected stage III rectal cancer, who underwent standardized mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, to receive either oral uracil-tegafur (400 mg/m2 tegafur per day) for one year or no treatment. Standardization and quality control of the surgery and pathological techniques were ensured by use of the guidelines of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. The secondary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

We enrolled and randomized 276 patients. Excluding two ineligible patients, 274 were included in the analysis. Planned interim analysis 2 years after accrual termination revealed significant prolongation of relapse-free survival (P = 0.001) and overall survival (P = 0.005) in the uracil-tegafur group. The 3-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 78 and 91% in the chemotherapy group and 60 and 81% in the surgery-alone group, respectively. Local recurrence rates were low in both groups. Grade 3 events occurred in 17% of the chemotherapy patients, but no grade 4 or more events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur improves survival of patients with stage III rectal cancer after standardized mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Number of Lymph Node Metastases Is Better Predictor of Prognosis Than Level of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Node-Positive Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is the most important prognostic factor for colon cancer patients. Survival is also related to the number and level of positive lymph nodes (PLNs). Definitions of degree of PLNs for colon cancer differ greatly between the number and level of PLNs.

STUDY DESIGN

The aim of this study is to compare number and level of PLNs to see which is a better predictor of prognosis for node-positive colon cancer. One hundred eighteen patients underwent histologically curative resection for node-positive colon cancer. We calculated the cumulative 5-year survival rates and examined prognostic factors for multivariate analysis based on the number and level of PLNs and additional factors. The number of PLNs was classified as either one to three PLNs or more than four PLNs, and level of PLNs was classified as either Level I (pericolic lymph node metastasis) or Level II (lymph node metastasis along the major named vessel supplying the tumor, and that around the origin of a main artery).

RESULTS

Cumulative 5-year survival rates were statistically different between the 1 to 3 PLNs group and the more than 4 PLNs group, but not significantly different between Level I group and Level II group. Multivariate analysis showed that number, not level, of PLNs was an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

In node-positive colon cancer, number of PLNs predicted prognosis better than level of PLNs.

Meta-analysis of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil in non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Recent clinical trials have shown the efficacy of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Japan, many clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil (UFT) have been conducted, and some trials showed positive results while others showed negative results. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT in NSCLC.

METHODS

Among nine trials of postoperative adjuvant UFT-containing chemotherapy, six trials comparing surgery alone with surgery plus UFT were identified. Of six trials, two were three-arm trials including cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by UFT, and data from that arm were not included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2,003 eligible patients, most (98.8%) had squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, and most had stage I disease; the tumor classification was T1 in 1,308 (65.3%), T2 in 674 (33.6%), and the nodal status was N0 in 1,923 (96.0%). The two treatment groups did not differ significantly in major prognostic factors. The median duration of follow-up was 6.44 years. The survival rates at 5 and 7 years were significantly higher in the surgery plus UFT group (81.5% and 76.5%, respectively) than in the surgery alone group (77.2% and 69.5%, respectively; P = .011 and .001, respectively). The overall pooled hazard ratio was 0.74, and its 95% CI was 0.61 to 0.88 (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT was associated with improved 5- and 7-year survival in a Japanese patient population composed primarily of stage I adenocarcinoma patients.

Preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy in combination with intraoperative radiotherapy for T3-4Nx rectal cancer

AIMS

To analyse the results of a single institution experience of combined preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy and intraoperative electron-radiation therapy (IORT) for locally advanced rectal cancer and to compare the results with surgery alone retrospectively.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 99 patients with clinical T3-4NxM0 adenocarcinoma of the rectum who had received preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy, radical surgery, and IORT [Group I]. Until 1998, 67 patients were treated with radiation only [Group Ia], and after 1999, 32 patients were concurrently given tegafur and uracil (UFT) [Group Ib]. 68 patients with clinical T3-4NxM0 rectal cancer were treated with surgery alone [Group II].

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 67 months in Group I and 83 months in Group II. Local recurrence rate was 2% in Group I, which was significantly lower than 16% in Group II (p=0.002) Both disease-free survival and overall survival in Group I were significantly better than those in Group II (p=0.04, p=0.02, respectively). Sphincter preservation was possible in 78% in Group Ib, which was significantly more than 42% in Group Ia (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined preoperative radio/chemo-radiotherapy and IORT for clinical T3-4Nx rectal cancer significantly reduces local recurrence and improves prognosis. Combination of preoperative radiotherapy and oral UFT improves the feasibility of sphincter-preservation.

Tumor dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression is a useful marker in adjuvant therapy with oral fluoropyrimidines after curative resection of colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-fluoropyrimidine (5-FU) catabolism. We examined whether tumor DPD expression is an effective marker in adjuvant therapy with oral fluoropyrimidines after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We studied 89 patients with stage II-III colorectal cancers who had undergone curative resections and received oral 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. The levels of DPD expression in tumor and normal colonic mucosa were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In 53 tumor samples, DPD enzymatic activity was also analyzed in order to evaluate the relationship between DPD expression and enzymatic activity.

RESULTS

DPD expression significantly correlated with DPD enzymatic activity in these 53 tumors ( r=0.56; P<0.001). DPD expression in the tumors was significantly lower than in normal mucosa (47.1+/-30.8 and 56.4+/-18.5 U/mg protein, respectively; P<0.05). We designated the cut-off value of tumor DPD as its median value (46.0 U/mg protein). Patients with low DPD expression had longer disease-free intervals than those with high DPD expression according to univariate analysis ( P=0.026). In a multivariate analysis, low DPD expression was significantly and independently associated with better survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor DPD expression is a useful marker for use with adjuvant chemotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidines after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Retrospective study on thymidylate synthase as a predictor of outcome and sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer

We carried out a retrospective evaluation of thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in tumor tissue, and its relation to outcome and response to treatment. The treatment consisted of chemotherapy with tegafur and uracil (UFT). The study group comprised 245 patients with curatively resected Dukes' stage B or C colorectal cancer who were postoperatively enrolled in a controlled study and assigned to receive UFT or no adjuvant chemotherapy. TS expression in tumor tissue was evaluated immunohistochemically with the use of recombinant human TS-specific antibody. Results were as follows. There was no relation between TS expression and the rate of 5-year disease-free survival. Similar results were obtained in both colonic and rectal tumors. The rate of 5-year disease-free survival was significantly higher in the UFT group than in the group receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy ( =0.0055). The difference in survival became more marked among patients whose tumors had diffuse TS expression ( =0.0027). There was no difference in survival between the treatment groups among patients whose tumors had focal TS expression. We conclude that, although unrelated to outcome, TS activity may be useful in predicting the response to adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT in patients with curatively resected Dukes' stage B or C colorectal cancer.