Anastomotic leakage following retrosternal pull-up

Modified reconstruction procedure in subtotal esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric pull up to reduce anastomotic leakage: a propensity score-matched analysis

One risk factor for anastomotic leakage (AL) after esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric reconstruction is excessive compression of the gastric tube at the thoracic inlet. In this study, we evaluated the effect of our modified procedure to reduce AL by placing the esophagogastric anastomosis below the thoracic inlet. Between January 2008 and December 2022, 174 consecutive patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric pull up, followed by circular stapler anastomosis in our hospitals. After January 2016, the gastric tube was pulled down to place the anastomosis below the suprasternal notch. Postoperative CT then measured the level of esophagogastric anastomosis (LEA). Comparing cases before and after revision (conventional group, n = 65 vs. test group, n = 109), AL was significantly reduced from 11 (16.9%) to 3 (2.8%) cases (P = 0.002). After propensity score matching, AL was observed in 14% (8/57) and 0% (0/57) cases in the conventional and test groups, respectively (P = 0.006). Smaller circular stapler size (P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001), and lower LEA (P < 0.001) were observed in the test group than in the conventional group. Multivariate analysis revealed that anastomotic procedure (OR [95%CI], 0.01[0.00-0.46], P = 0.008), and body mass index (OR [95%CI], 6.92[1.10-135.01], P = 0.038) were the independent risk factors for the development of AL. Our modified procedure to avoid compression of the gastric tube at the thoracic inlet is suggested to noninvasively reduce the risk of AL in the subtotal esophagectomy with retrosternal reconstruction.

Sex differences in survival following surgery for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. Evidence supports that sex- based disparities in esophageal cancer survival could be attributed to sex- specific risk exposures, such as age at diagnosis, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, drinking, and histological type. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of sex disparities in survival of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1966 to February 2023, was held. Studies that reported sex-related differences in survival outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were identified. A total of 314 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Statistically significant results derived from 1-year and 2-year overall survival pooled analysis with Relative Risk (RR) 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.97, I2 = 52.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95, I2 = 0.00), respectively (RR < 1 = favorable for men). In the postoperative complications analysis, statistically significant results concerned anastomotic leak and heart complications, RR: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.16) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.75), respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed among studies with <200 and > 200 patients, histology types, study continent and publication year. Overall, sex tends to be an independent prognostic factor for esophageal carcinoma. However, unanimous results seem rather obscure when multivariable analysis and subgroup analysis occurred. More prospective studies and gender-specific protocols should be conducted to better understand the modifying role of sex in esophageal cancer prognosis.

Association of perioperative oral swallowing function with post-esophagectomy outcomes and nutritional statuses in patients with esophageal cancer

Dysphagia after esophagectomy is a serious complication; however, no method has been established to accurately assess swallowing function. We evaluated the association of swallowing function tests with patients' post-esophagectomy complications and nutritional statuses. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 95 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy between 2016 and 2021. We performed perioperative swallowing function tests, including the repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), maximum phonation time (MPT), and laryngeal elevation (LE). Patients with recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP) and respiratory complications (RC) had significantly lower postoperative RSST scores than patients without them; the scores in patients with or without anastomotic leakage (AL) were similar. Postoperative MPT in patients with RLNP was shorter than that in patients without RLNP; however, it was similar to that in patients with or without AL and RC. LE was not associated with any complications. Patients with an RSST score ≤2 at 2 weeks post-esophagectomy had significant weight loss at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively compared with patients with an RSST score ≥3. The proportion of patients with severe weight loss (≥20% weight loss) within 1 year of esophagectomy was significantly greater in patients with RSST scores ≤2 than in those with RSST scores ≥3. Multivariate analysis showed that an RSST score ≤2 was the only predictor of severe post-esophagectomy weight loss. RSST scoring is a simple tool for evaluating post-esophagectomy swallowing function. A lower RSST score is associated with postoperative RLNP, RC, and poor nutritional status.

Efficacy and Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Retrosternal Route Creation for the Gastric Conduit: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Posterior Mediastinal Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Retrosternal reconstruction has lower risks for severe postoperative morbidities, such as gastro-tracheal fistula or esophageal hiatal hernia. We have previously reported the laparoscopic retrosternal route creation (LRRC) method, but its safety and efficacy remain unclear.

METHODS

In total, 374 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in the prone position between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We performed a propensity score-matched analysis with the simple, nearest-neighbor method and no calipers to compare postoperative outcomes and reconstructed gastric conduit functionality between patients who underwent LRRC and counterparts who underwent posterior mediastinal reconstruction.

RESULTS

After matching, 62 patients were included in the laparoscopic retrosternal group (LR group) or posterior mediastinal group (PM group). No significant differences were observed between the groups, apart from the number of robot-assisted surgeries, the extent of lymph node dissection, and the method of cervical anastomosis. There were no significant differences in the incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications. Gastro-tracheal fistula (n = 1) and esophageal hiatal hernia (n = 2) occurred in the PM group but not in the LR group. There were no differences in the incidence of pulmonary embolism between the groups (5% vs. 5%). The postoperative anastomotic stenosis rate was similar (16% vs. 27%, p = 0.192). Endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis (modified Los Angeles classification ≥ M) at 1 year after surgery were significantly better in the LR group (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

LRRC for gastric conduit reconstruction is safe and valuable. It is associated with good reconstructed gastric conduit function.

Impact of intravenous injection of glucagon on anastomotic leakage in esophagectomy

Background

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy affects the early postoperative state and prognosis. However, effective measures to prevent anastomotic leakage in esophagogastric anastomosis have not been established.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective, observational study included 147 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2020. Glucagon was administered to extend the gastric tube in patients who underwent esophagectomy from January 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: a glucagon-treated group (2016-2020) and a control group (2010-2015). The incidence of anastomotic leakage was compared between the two groups for evaluation of the preventive effects of glucagon administration on anastomotic leakage.

Results

The length of the gastric tube from the pyloric ring to the final branch of the right gastroepiploic artery was extended by 2.8 cm after glucagon injection. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was significantly lower in the glucagon-treated group (19% vs. 38%; p = 0.014). Multivariate analysis showed that glucagon injection was the only independent factor associated with a reduction in anastomotic leakage (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.87). Esophagogastric anastomosis was performed proximal to the final branch of the right gastroepiploic artery in 37% patients in the glucagon-treated group, and these cases showed a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage than did those with anastomosis distal to the final branch of the right gastroepiploic artery (10% vs. 25%, p = 0.087).

Conclusions

Extension of the gastric tube by intravenous glucagon administration during gastric mobilization in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer may be effective in preventing anastomotic leakage.

Predictive impact of the thoracic inlet space on ICG fluorescence blood flow speed in the gastric conduit wall and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy

PURPOSE

The thoracic inlet space might influence the blood vessel perfusion in the gastric conduit. The purpose of this study was to clarify the impacts of the thoracic inlet space on blood vessel perfusion in the gastric conduit and anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-two esophageal cancer patients underwent esophagectomy followed by gastric conduit reconstruction via the retrosternal route. The blood flow speed in the gastric conduit was measured using indocyanine green fluorescence before and after reconstruction. Parameters at the thoracic inlet space were measured using CT. We then investigated the correlation between these two parameters and whether they could predict anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Blood flow speed in the gastric conduit was slower after reconstruction than before reconstruction (P < 0.001). The incidence of anastomotic leakage (n = 23) was higher among patients with a delayed blood flow speed before reconstruction (n = 27) than among those with a non-delayed blood flow speed before reconstruction (n = 115) (P < 0.001). Among the patients with a non-delayed blood flow speed before reconstruction, the thoracic inlet area (TIA, sternum-tracheal distance × clavicle head distance) was positively correlated with the blood flow speed after reconstruction (P = 0.023) and was identified as an independent predictor of anastomotic leakage (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A narrow TIA was associated with a delayed blood flow speed in the gastric conduit after reconstruction and was capable of predicting anastomotic leakage in the patients with a non-delayed blood flow speed before reconstruction.