Definition and severity grading of postoperative lymphatic leakage following inguinal lymph node dissection

Postoperative lymphatic leakage following laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: the first case report and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Postoperative lymphatic leakage (PLL) is a rare and poorly understood complication following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). While seroma is a well-documented postoperative finding, the potential for lymphatic leakage and subsequent lymphatic fistula is frequently overlooked and often misclassified. This report presents a unique case of postoperative lymphocele following Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair and discusses diagnostic considerations, management strategies, and implications for surgical practice.

METHODS

We report the case of a 56-year-old male who developed a large, symptomatic inguinal lymphocele after undergoing TEP LIHR. Diagnosis was confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analysis of the drained fluid. Management involved surgical drainage followed by low-dose radiotherapy. A narrative literature review was also performed to identify existing evidence on PLL following LIHR.

RESULTS

The patient developed a significant septated fluid collection (115 × 60 × 50 mm) compressing the bladder, consistent with a lymphocele. Drain output peaked at 350 mL/day. Fractionated low-dose radiotherapy (0.5 Gy × 10 sessions) led to a marked reduction in lymphatic output to <10 mL/day, permitting safe drain removal. At two-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic. A narrative literature search revealed no previously reported cases of PLL following LIHR.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of lymphocele and lymphatic fistula formation following TEP LIHR. This case highlights the need to recognize lymphatic leakage as a distinct complication. Low-dose radiotherapy appears to be an effective, minimally invasive treatment. Standardized terminology and further research are essential to improve diagnosis and management.

Risk factors for lymphatic leakage following radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic leakage is a common complication after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).This study aimed to investigate the risk factors contributing to postoperative lymphatic leakage in patients with MIBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 534 patients undergoing radical cystectomy and PLND were enrolled in the retrospective study at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2010 to July 2023. Patients were categorized into lymphatic leakage(n = 254)and non-leakage groups (n = 280) and compared demographic, perioperativ and pathologic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for lymphatic leakage. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the relationship between lymph leakage ratio and risk factors.

RESULTS

Patients with lymphatic leakage had significantly higher rates of receiving extended PLND (19.7% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.008), higher total number of dissected lymph nodes (median 11 vs. 8, p < 0.001), longer hospital stays (median 13 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001), higher postoperative hypoalbuminemia rate (56.7% vs. 36.4%, p < 0.001) and higher fever rate (14.2% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.04) compared to the non-leakage group. On multivariate analysis, higher number of dissected lymph nodes (OR 3.278, 95% CI 1.135-9.471, p = 0.028) was found to be a independent risk factor for lymphatic leakage. Additionally, a positive correlation was observed between the numbers of dissected lymph nodes and lymphatic leakage rate (R = 0.456, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased number of dissected lymph nodes is associated with a heightened risk of lymphatic leakage following radical cystectomy for MIBC.

The Role of the Omniflow II Biosynthetic Graft in Postoperative Wound Problems After Lower Limb Revascularization: A Single Center Prospective Registry

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of the Omniflow II prosthesis in the prevention of vascular graft infection (VGI) in patients with peripheral arterial disease and to report on short-and mid-term graft-related morbidity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were included in prospective registry between October 2019 and March 2023. The primary endpoint was to report infection-related problems, operation-related wound problems, and short- and mid-term graft-related morbidity. Secondary endpoint was to report the bypass patency rates and limb salvage rates.

RESULTS

A total of 146 Omniflow II grafts were implanted in 125 patients. Sixty-seven patients (45.9%) received a femoral interposition graft, and 77 patients (52.7%) underwent ipsilateral bypass surgery (femoropopliteal or femorocrural). Forty-one patients (28.1%) underwent crural bypass surgery. Seventy-six patients (52.1%) had previous vascular operation in the groin. The mean follow-up time was 352 days (range 0-1108 days). 3.4% of the patients suffered a wound infection limited to the dermis, and in 8.2%, the subcutaneous tissue was involved. Five early VGI (3.4%) and one late VGI (0.7%) occurred. One year primary patency rate of above-the-knee bypass was significantly better compared to the bypass below the knee (74.5% ± 0.131 versus 54% ± 0.126 (P = 0.049)). This difference was not significantly different when below-the-knee bypass surgery was compared with crural bypass surgery (54% ± 0.126 versus 23.8% ± 0.080 (P = 0.098)).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the Omniflow II prosthesis in the preventive setting is highly influenced by the anatomic location of the distal anastomosis. No influence on the incidence of postoperative wound problems could be observed. The rate of Omniflow II VGI in a high-risk population is similar to reported outcomes in other prosthetic grafts.

ICG mapping of postoperative lymphatic leakage in the groin: a video article and literature review

Background

Inguinofemoral lymphoceles are a common postoperative complication after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (LNE) and a challenge for patients as well as physicians. We report here our preliminary experience in the surgical management of a recurrent lymphocele using indocyanine green (ICG) detection, followed by robotic-assisted closure of the lymphatic leaks.

Objectives

The aim of this article is to illustrate the surgical steps of ICG-assisted detection of inguinal lymphatic leaks and their surgical treatment by means of robot-assisted suturing. Furthermore, the feasibility of the approach will be evaluated.

Materials and methods

A 59-year-old woman with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and previous conventional bilateral inguinofemoral LNE presented with symptomatic therapy-resistant lymphoceles in the groin. After a lengthy and frustrating course of standard therapy, she was offered the off-label option surgical treatment with ICG detection and subsequent robot-assisted ligation of the leaks, using the Da Vinci robotic system™.

Main outcome measures

Perioperative data, specific aspects of the surgical approach specifics, objective and subjective outcomes of the new approach.

Results

The procedure was performed as planned, with no intraoperative complications or device-related issues. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient developed no further lymphoceles.

Conclusion

Visualisation of the leakage by ICG combined with minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopy is a promising therapy option. The pictures and videos demonstrate our experience in regard of the safety, feasibility, and usefulness of this procedure. Further studies will be needed, to prove the absolute efficacy of the technique and express a general recommendation in regard of this approach for the treatment of inguinofemoral lymphoceles.

Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus

BACKGROUND

Inguinal lymph node dissection plays an important role in the management of melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection is associated with various intraoperative and postoperative complications with significant heterogeneity in classification and reporting. This lack of standardization challenges efforts to study and report inguinal lymph node dissection outcomes. The aim of this study was to devise a system to standardize the classification and reporting of inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications by creating a worldwide collaborative, the complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area (CALI) group.

METHODS

A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α.

RESULTS

Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer.

CONCLUSION

The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer.

Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions

Lymph nodes (LNs) are important hubs for metastatic cell arrest and growth, immune modulation, and secondary dissemination to distant sites through a series of mechanisms, and it has been proved that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an essential prognostic indicator in many different types of cancer. Therefore, it is important for oncologists to understand the mechanisms of tumor cells to metastasize to LNs, as well as how LNM affects the prognosis and therapy of patients with cancer in order to provide patients with accurate disease assessment and effective treatment strategies. In recent years, with the updates in both basic and clinical studies on LNM and the application of advanced medical technologies, much progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms of LNM and the strategies for diagnosis and treatment of LNM. In this review, current knowledge of the anatomical and physiological characteristics of LNs, as well as the molecular mechanisms of LNM, are described. The clinical significance of LNM in different anatomical sites is summarized, including the roles of LNM playing in staging, prognostic prediction, and treatment selection for patients with various types of cancers. And the novel exploration and academic disputes of strategies for recognition, diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions of metastatic LNs are also discussed.

Postoperative drainage management and wound complications following resection of lower limb soft tissue tumors: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Postoperative wound complications are common in patients undergoing resection of lower extremity soft tissue tumors. Postoperative drainage therapy ensures adequate wound healing but may delay or complicate it. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of postoperative wound complications and delayed or prolonged drainage treatment and to propose a standardized definition and severity grading of complex postoperative courses.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective analysis of 80 patients who had undergone primary resection of lower extremity soft tissue tumors was performed. A new classification was developed, which takes into account postoperative drainage characteristics and wound complications. Based on this classification, risk factors and the prognostic value of daily drainage volumes were evaluated.

RESULTS

According to this new definition, regular postoperative course grade 0 (no wound complication and timely drainage removal) occurred in 26 patients (32.5%), grade A (minor wound complications or delayed drainage removal) in 12 (15.0%), grade B (major wound complication or prolonged drainage therapy) in 31 (38.8%), and grade C (reoperation) in 11 (13.7%) patients. Tumor-specific characteristics, such as tumor size (p = 0.0004), proximal tumor location (p = 0.0484), and tumor depth (p = 0.0138) were identified as risk factors for complex postoperative courses (grades B and C). Drainage volume on postoperative day 4 was a suitable predictor for complex courses (cutoff of 70 ml/d).

CONCLUSION

The proposed definition incorporates wound complications and drainage management while also being clinically relevant and easy to apply. It may serve as a standardized endpoint for assessing the postoperative course after resection of lower extremity soft tissue tumors.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has now been established as a safe and minimally invasive technique that is deemed feasible for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the role of LLR in treating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) patients has been rarely reported. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of LLR when compared with open liver resection (OLR) procedure for patients with cHCC-CC.

METHODS

A total of 229 cHCC-CC patients who underwent hepatic resection (34 LLR and 195 OLR patients) from January 2014 to December 2018 in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were enrolled and underwent a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between the LLR and OLR groups to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) parameters were assessed by the log-rank test and the sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 34 LLR and 68 OLR patients were included after PSM analysis. The LLR group displayed a shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.61 vs. 8.26 days; p value < 0.001) when compared with the OLR group. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative complications' incidence or a negative surgical margin rate between the two groups (p value = 0.409 and p value = 1.000, respectively). The aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and inflammatory indicators in the LLR group were significantly lower than those in the OLR group on the first and third postoperative days. Additionally, OS and RFS were comparable in both the LLR and OLR groups (p value = 0.700 and p value = 0.780, respectively), and similar results were obtained by conducting a sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

LLR can impart less liver function damage, better inflammatory response attenuation contributing to a faster recovery, and parallel oncologic outcomes when compared with OLR. Therefore, LLR can be recommended as a safe and effective therapeutic modality for treating selected cHCC-CC patients, especially for those with small tumors in favorable location.

Quality assurance and quality control in surgical oncology

Even though surgery has remained a key component within multi-disciplinary cancer care, the expectations have changed. Instead of serving as a modality to free a patient of a mass at all means and at the risk of high morbidity, modern cancer surgery is expected to provide adequate tumor clearance with lowest invasiveness. This review summarizes the evidence on quality assurance in surgical oncology and gives a comprehensive overview of quality improvement tools.

Lymphatic Function of the Lower Limb after Groin Dissection for Vulvar Cancer and Reconstruction with Lymphatic SCIP Flap

Inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy, frequently performed for vulvar cancer, is burdened with substantial immediate and long-term morbidity. One of the most disabling treatment-related sequelae is lower limb lymphedema (LLL). The present study aims to describe the wound complications and the severity of LLL in patients who have undergone groin dissection for vulvar cancer and immediate inguinal reconstruction with the Lymphatic Superficial Circumflex Iliac Perforator flap (L-SCIP). We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent bilateral groin dissection and unilateral inguinal reconstruction with the L-SCIP. The presence and severity of postoperative LLL during the follow-up period were assessed by lymphoscintigraphy and limbs' volume measurement. In addition, immediate complications at the level of the inguinal area were registered. The changes between preoperative and postoperative limb volumes were analyzed by Student's t test. p values < 0.05 were considered significant. Thirty-one patients were included. The mean variation of volume was 479 ± 330 cc3 in the side where groin reconstruction had been performed, and 683 ± 425 cc3 in the contralateral side, showing smaller variation in the treated side (p = 0.022). Lymphoscintigraphy confirmed the clinical findings. Based on our results, inguinal reconstruction with L-SCIP performed at the same time of groin dissection in patients treated for vulvar cancer can provide a significant protective effect on LLL.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Lymphatic Complications of the Groin Following Open Lower Extremity Revascularization with Plastic Surgery Closure

INTRODUCTION

Lymphatic complications following vascular procedures involving the groin require prompt treatment to limit morbidity. Several treatments have been described, including conservative management, aspiration, sclerotherapy, and direct lymphatic ligation with or without a muscle flap have been described. To date, there is no data indicating which treatment results in the shortest time to recovery. We sought to address this gap by conducting a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients who developed a lymphatic complication after undergoing an open revascularization procedure in the groin between 2014 and 2020 in which plastic surgery was involved in the closure. A control group consisted of patients from the same timespan who did not develop a lymphatic complication. Demographics, comorbidities, operative details, and outcomes were compared between these groups. For cases identified with a lymphatic complication, the method of diagnosis, culture data, and treatment details were collected, and outcomes were compared for surgical management versus sclerotherapy.

RESULTS

There were 27 lymphatic complications and 60 control patients. The complication group had a higher incidence of aortofemoral bypass (25.8% vs. 8.3%, p=0.04), and a lower incidence of femoral-to-distal bypass (11.1% vs. 45.0%, p<0.01). Daily drain output volume from postoperative days 1-5, and days 6-10, was significantly higher in the complication group than in the controls (194.0 vs. 44.0, p<0.01; and 429.5 vs. 35.0, p<0.01, respectively). In the lymphatic leak group, 16 patients (59.3%) had surgical treatment and six (22.2%) had sclerotherapy. Of those who had surgery, 71.4% had successful outcomes without the need for an additional intervention, whereas all of the patients analyzed who were treated with sclerotherapy had successful outcomes without further intervention. The average time to resolution was significantly shorter for surgery than for sclerotherapy (38.7 vs. 86.0 days, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily postoperative drain volume can assist with early diagnosis of a lymphatic leak in the groin following an open revascularization procedure. Sclerotherapy and surgery were each successful, but surgery resulted in significantly shorter times to resolution. In the appropriate candidates, surgery should be considered first line management of a lymphatic leak.