Recent advances and conceptual changes in the classification of neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus

Thymic epithelial tumours: histopathological classification and differential diagnosis

The epithelial and lymphoid compartments of the thymus can give rise to a wide variety of tumours, including thymomas, thymic carcinomas, lymphoreticular proliferations, germ cell tumours, and sarcomas. While some of these have close similarity to their counterparts in other organs, both in terms of histology and immunohistochemistry, as well as molecular features, others are unique to the thymus. The epithelial tumours, which can develop in the thymus, will be discussed in this review, with a particular emphasis on resolving differential diagnosis by means of morphology, immunohistochemical profiles, and molecular diagnostics.

Current understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms in neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Despite the fact that important advances in research on neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have been made, consistent data about their pathogenetic mechanism are still lacking. Furthermore, different primary sites may recognize different pathogenetic mechanisms.

AREAS COVERED

This review analyzes the possible biological and molecular mechanisms that may lead to NEN onset and progression in different organs. Through extensive research of the literature, risk factors including hypercholesterolemia, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic atrophic gastritis are evaluated as potential pathogenetic mechanisms. Consistent evidence is available regarding sporadic gastric NENs and MEN1 related duodenopancreatic NENs precursor lesions, and genetic-epigenetic mutations may play a pivotal role in tumor development and bone metastases onset. In lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), diffuse proliferation of neuroendocrine cells on the bronchial wall (DIPNECH) has been proposed as a premalignant lesion, while in lung neuroendocrine carcinoma nicotine and smoke could be responsible for carcinogenic processes. Also, rare primary NENs such as thymic (T-NENs) and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have been analyzed, finding different possible pathogenetic mechanisms.

EXPERT OPINION

New technologies in genomics and epigenomics are bringing new light to the pathogenetic landscape of NENs, but further studies are needed to improve both prevention and treatment in these heterogeneous neoplasms.

The maximal contrast-enhanced range of CT for differentiating the WHO pathological subtypes and risk subgroups of thymic epithelial tumors

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of maximal contrast-enhanced (CEmax) range using contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) imaging in differentiating the pathological subtypes and risk subgroups of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).

METHODS

The pre-treatment-CECT images of 319 TET patients from May 2012 to November 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The CEmax was defined as the maximum difference between the CT value of the solid tumor on pre-contrast and contrast-enhanced images. The mean CEmax value was calculated at three different tumor levels.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the CEmax among the eight main pathological subtypes [types A, AB, B1, B2, and B3 thymoma, thymic carcinoma (TC), low-grade neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and high-grade NET] (p < 0.001). Among the eight subtypes, the CEmax values of types A, AB, and low-risk NET were higher than those of the other subtypes (all p < 0.001), and there was no difference among types B1-B3 and high-risk NET (all p > 0.05). There was no difference for CEmax values between NET and TC (p = 0.491). For the risk subgroups, the CEmax of TC (including NET) was 35.35 ± 11.41 HU, which was lower than that of low-risk thymoma (A and AB) (57.73±21.24 HU) (P < 0.001) and was higher than that of high-risk thymoma (B1-B3) (27.37±8.27 HU) (P < 0.001). The CEmax cut-off values were 38.5 HU and 30.5 HU respectively (AUC: 0.829 and 0.712; accuracy, 72.4% and 67.7%).

CONCLUSION

The tumor CEmax on CECT helps differentiate the pathological subtypes and risk subgroups of TETs.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

In this study, an improved simplified risk grouping method was proposed based on the traditional (2004 edition) simplified risk grouping method for TETs. If Type B1 thymoma is classified as high-risk, radiologists using this improved method may improve the accuracy in differentiating risk level of TETs compared with the traditional method.

Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) Is a Marker of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasia in Gastroenteropancreatic and Pulmonary Tract and Predicts Poor Prognosis

Simple Summary

Neuroendocrine neoplasms most frequently arise in the gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary tract and show an increasing incidence and prevalence. The prognosis and treatment depend on tumor proliferation and clinical behavior. Highly proliferating grade 3 neoplasms especially, show a wildly divergent therapy response and prognosis. In particular, it is crucial to securely separate the more indolent G3 tumors from the more aggressive carcinomas. Currently, this distinction is based on a combination of clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular biomarkers. However, none of these markers allow for a reliable distinction, and additional markers are needed. EZH2 has attracted increasing interest in different tumor entities. We aimed to analyze the expression of EZH2 in different neuroendocrine neoplasms and to correlate the expression with clinical parameters and survival. We demonstrate that EZH2 is nearly exclusively expressed in highly proliferative neoplasms and is a robust biomarker for identifying aggressive G3 tumors with poor prognosis.

Abstract

Tumor grading is a robust prognostic predictor in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and guides therapy, especially in tumors with high proliferation. NEN can be separated into well-differentiated and poorly differentiated types. The more aggressive NEN have been further separated into neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) with a better prognosis and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) with a worse prognosis. Despite this distinction’s tremendous clinical and therapeutic relevance, optimal diagnostic biomarkers are still lacking. In this study, we analyzed the protein expression and prognostic impact of Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) by immunohistochemistry in 219 tissue samples of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP-NEN) and pulmonary NEN (P-NEN). EZH2 was almost exclusively expressed in NEN with a proliferation rate above 20% (G3), while all low-grade tumors were nearly negative. Among high-grade NEN, 65% showed high and 35% low expression of EZH2. In this group, the high expression of EZH2 was significantly associated with poor overall survival and NEC histology. Interestingly, EZH2 seems to act independently of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) in NEN. In conclusion, we propose EZH2 as a robust biomarker for distinguishing between NET G3 and NEC among gastroenteropancreatic and pulmonary NEN.

Correlation of Somatostatin Receptor 2 Expression, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET Scan and Octreotide Treatment in Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) has been shown to be expressed in a subset of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas and plays a role in imaging studies and guiding therapy. Patients with tumors expressing SSTR2 may be successfully treated with somatostatin inhibitors or radiolabeled somatostatin analogues. We studied SSTR2 expression in TET and correlated it with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT or 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR results and treatment outcome. An institutional database of TET was searched for thymoma, thymic carcinoma, and thymic neuroendocrine tumor (TNET) with available resection specimens. Cases were subtyped (2021 WHO classification) and staged (8th AJCC/UICC staging). A section was stained with anti-SSTR2 antibody (clone UMB1). Percent tumor cells with membranous staining was recorded if present in ≥1% of tumor cells. Medical records were searched for 68Ga-DOTATATE PET scans and treatment. Statistical analysis was performed. Eighty patients (1969-2021) with a median age of 61.3 years (range, 19.1-87.3) (37 males, 46.3%) had thymic carcinoma (N=33), TNET (N=7), or thymoma (N=40). SSTR2 expression was identified in 29 (of 80, 36.3%) TET including 2/2 (100%) small cell carcinomas, 2/5 (40.0%) atypical carcinoid tumors, 16/23 (69.6%) squamous cell carcinomas, 2/2 (100%) lymphoepithelial carcinomas, 1/1 (100%) adenosquamous carcinoma, and 6/40 (15.0%) thymomas. SSTR2 expression in ≥50% of tumor cells (vs 1-49%) was associated with younger age (p=0.023) and shorter recurrence/metastasis-free survival (p=0.007). 68Ga-DOTATATE PET scans (N=9) revealed a Krenning score of 3 in patients with atypical carcinoid tumor, small cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma (N=1 each) with SSTR2 expression in 95, 100, and 5% of tumor cells, respectively. Scans with Krenning scores of ≤2 (N=5) were seen in tumors with no SSTR2 expression in 80% of cases and a single atypical carcinoid tumor with SSTR2 expression in 10% of tumor cells. One scan resulted as "increased uptake" was in a patient with no SSTR2 expression. In conclusion, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET scans correlated with SSTR2 expression in TET in most patients and appeared to be useful to identify patients with TET who may be amenable to treatment with somatostatin analogues. Larger studies including more patients with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET scans are necessary to independently and prospectively validate our findings.