A minority of cases of acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary glands are driven by an NR4A2 rearrangement: the diagnostic utility of the assessment of NR4A2 and NR4A3 alterations in salivary gland tumors

Role of Ancillary Techniques in the Differential Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Carcinomas

Paiva-Correia A, Hellquist H, Apolónio J, Castelo-Branco P. Role of ancillary techniques in the differential diagnosis of salivary gland carcinomas. The diagnosis of salivary gland carcinomas (SGC) rests mainly on histology, but immunohistochemical and molecular investigations are often necessary for differential diagnosis. This review is primarily aimed as a tool for pathologists in non-specialised head and neck hospitals who encounter a limited number of SGC annually. The use of testing an initial antibody panel, which may comprise both positive and negative expression for a suspected entity, and examples of different panels are outlined. We also focused on acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), which is positive for DOG1 and negative for mammaglobin, whilst secretory carcinoma (SC) is positive for mammaglobin and negative for DOG1. In addition, the exclusive expression of androgen and HER2 in salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) and its use for differential diagnosis are also addressed. This review also highlights the particularities of mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and its negativity for S100 and SOX10, which distinguishes it from some of its mimics. In laboratories with limited access to antibodies for SGC, we recommend inclusion of mammaglobin. The use of molecular techniques for the diagnosis of MEC (MAML2), SC (ETV6), adenoid cystic carcinoma (MYB), and AcCC (NR4A3) is discussed. We highlight the role of commonly available antibodies for the histological classification of SGC.

NanoString nCounter-Based Assay for Detection of Fusion-Associated Salivary Gland Tumors

PURPOSE

Salivary gland tumors include numerous subtypes that vary from benign to highly aggressive, with many showing overlapping histopathological features that can make diagnosis challenging. Most subtypes express driver fusion genes that are tumor specific, and detection of such fusions is useful for differentiating amongst specific diagnoses, determining appropriate tumor grading, and guiding effective treatment. Currently, fusions can be detected by FISH, RT-PCR or through next-generation sequencing approaches, all of which are highly effective methodologies but can be costly or time consuming.

METHODS

We developed a rapid NanoString nCounter platform-based assay to detect salivary gland tumor fusions using a combination of fusion junction-specific probes and an approach through differential exon expression analysis. The assay includes 68 junction-specific probes and analysis of exon expression across 9 fusion-associated genes in a single multiplex assay.

RESULTS

Out of 55 retrospective and 171 prospective cases assayed, we accurately detected the majority of cases of pleomorphic adenoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, cribriform adenocarcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, secretory carcinoma and NUT-rearranged carcinoma, including cases of these tumor types arising in non-salivary gland sites, with the major drawback being an inability to detect MAML2-containing mucoepidermoid samples. With mucoepidermoid carcinoma excluded, the assay shows an overall sensitivity of 96.1% and specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSION

We show that the majority of salivary gland tumor fusions can be effectively detected with a single rapid NanoString based assay, which can serve as a useful adjunctive tool for routine diagnostic head and neck pathology. The assay is low cost with a rapid turnaround time (30 h total assay time per sample batch, with minimal technician input required) compared to alternate detection methods.