Therapeutic superiority of combined propranolol with short steroids course over propranolol monotherapy in infantile hemangioma

Efficacy of 0.5% Timolol Maleate versus 0.05% Clobetasol Propionate in Treating Superficial Infantile Hemangioma: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim

To compare the efficacy of two topical agents in superficial infantile hemangioma (SIH).

Materials and Methods

A Randomised controlled trial was carried out with details as follows.

Design

A prospective double-blinded, double-armed, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Multidisciplinary unit from 2022 to 2024.

Subjects

Children younger than 2 years with color Doppler-confirmed SIH (superficial to deep dermal fascia).

Methods

Randomization in treatment arm I: topical beta-blocker 0.5% timolol maleate (TTM) solution or treatment arm II: ultrapotent topical Steroid 0.05% clobetasol propionate ointment.

Outcome

(1) reduction in area, (2) color change on visual analog scale (VAS), and (3) total VAS scores for color, size, and thickness. Each VAS parameter was rated from 0 to 3 (cumulative score 0-9).

Results

Twenty patients were enrolled in each arm. Four patients in each group missed 96 weeks of follow up assessment but completed at least 9 months of treatment. In arm I, two patients were transitioned from TTM to oral propranolol due to rapid progression deep into the dermis. Arm I demonstrated a quicker improvement in color with a steeper reduction in area. The mean total VAS score on 9-point sales was comparable in both arms at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months of treatment (P = 0.223, P = 0.123, P = 0.123, P = 0.123, and P = 0.103). At the end of the 96th week, both treatments achieved an excellent response (P = 0.634) with no rebound growth.

Conclusion

0.5%-TTM solution can be a first-line therapy for SIH due to its rapid onset of action and overall comparable efficacy in reducing SIH size. While clobetasol remains effective, its slower response may limit its utility.

The Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Infantile Hemangiomas-A Comprehensive Review

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common pediatric benign vascular tumor. Its pathogenesis is still poorly understood, and it usually appears during the first few weeks of life and follows a characteristic natural course of proliferation and involution. Most IHs are small, benign, resolve spontaneously, and do not require active treatment but only active observation. A minority of IHs are potentially problematic because they can cause life-threatening complications, permanent disfigurement, and functional impairment. Diagnosis is usually clinical, and propranolol is currently the mainstay of treatment. Other therapeutic modalities may be used alone or in combination, depending on the characteristics of the specific IH. New treatment options are being explored every day, and some are showing promising results. It is undeniable that therapeutic modalities for IHs must be selected based on the child's age, the size and location of the lesion, the presence of complications, the implementation conditions, and the possible outcomes of the treatment. The future of IH management will certainly be reflected in improved advanced imaging modalities, research into the genetic and molecular basis, the development of new pharmacological agents or techniques, and the development of standardized protocols, all to optimize outcomes with minimal side effects.

Once a day administration of R(+) propranolol is sufficient to block vasculogenesis in a xenograft model of infantile hemangioma

OBJECTIVES

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is a benign vascular tumor that occurs in 5% of infants, predominantly in female and preterm neonates. Propranolol is the mainstay of treatment for IH. Given the short half-life of propranolol regarding β-adrenergic receptor inhibition as well as its side effects, propranolol is administered to infants 2-3 times daily with 1 mg/kg/dose. We previously demonstrated propranolol inhibits IH vessel formation via an effect of its R(+) enantiomer on the endothelial-specific transcription factor SRY box 18 (SOX18). In light of this, we hypothesized that R(+) propranolol inhibition of SOX18 is long-lived compared to the beta-blocker effects, and therefore administration of R(+) propranolol once a day would be sufficient to block IH vessel formation.

METHODS

We tested the effect of one dose versus two doses of R(+) propranolol in a xenograft model of IH wherein patient-derived hemangioma stem cells (HemSC) were implanted subcutaneously into nude mice. Mice were treated for 7 days with 2 × 12.5 mg/kg/day (n=12) versus 1 × 25 mg/kg/day (n=14) as well as PBS (vehicle control) (n=16) via intraperitoneal injections. The doses were estimated to correlate with those given to infants with IH.

RESULTS

Treatment with R(+) propranolol significantly inhibited vasculogenesis in our IH xenograft model at both 2 × 12.5 mg/kg/day and 1 × 25 mg/kg/day, compared to vehicle controls. No significant difference was observed between the two treatment regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest implications for the clinical management of infants with IH: Administration of R(+) propranolol can possibly minimize or omit concerning β-adrenergic side effects while only requiring one dose per day.

Infantile hemangioma: the common and enigmatic vascular tumor

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is a benign vascular tumor that occurs in 5% of newborns. The tumor follows a life cycle of rapid proliferation in infancy, followed by slow involution in childhood. This unique life cycle has attracted the interest of basic and clinical scientists alike as a paradigm for vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vascular regression. Unanswered questions persist about the genetic and molecular drivers of the proliferating and involuting phases. The beta blocker propranolol usually accelerates regression of problematic IHs, yet its mechanism of action on vascular proliferation and differentiation is unclear. Some IHs fail to respond to beta blockers and regrow after discontinuation. Side effects occur and long-term sequelae of propranolol treatment are unknown. This poses clinical challenges and raises novel questions about the mechanisms of vascular overgrowth in IH.

Practice Variations in Managing Infantile Hemangiomas

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common benign tumor of infancy. For children with IH who require treatment, propranolol and other beta blockers have been shown to be safe and effective. Although consensus guidelines for managing IH have been published, anecdotal experience suggests that there remain variations in management. This study was performed to document these variations amongst providers and to identify areas for future research. We conducted an Internet-based survey of clinicians who treat patients with IH. Hypothetical cases and management scenarios were presented. Twenty-nine respondents participated in the survey. Most respondents use generic propranolol in infants with growing IH of the head and neck, with a goal dose of 2 mg/kg/d, until ~1 year of age. A variety of management strategies were documented including which patients should be treated, optimal dose and duration of therapy, how patients should be monitored, which patients should get additional workup, how propranolol should best be discontinued, and how often to see patients in follow-up. This study demonstrates wide practice variations in managing patients with IH. Further research is indicated to address these variations and develop additional/updated evidence-based guidelines.

Apelin Receptor Can Act as a Specific Marker and Promising Therapeutic Target for Infantile Hemangioma

Infantile hemangioma (IH), the most common benign tumor in infancy, is generally sensitive to propranolol treatment. However, the challenge remains because resistance or recurrence could occur in some patients, and the mechanism or target of propranolol remains unknown. Therefore, advancement in the drug development is needed. In this study, we explored whether apelin receptor (APJ) can become a candidate target. We found that APJ is expressed only in endothelial cells of IH (HemECs) but not in other vascular anomalies, and its antagonist, ML221, can negatively regulate cellular viability and functions of HemECs. This inhibitory effect could be replicated in a murine hemangioma model. Importantly, in vitro experiments also indicated that ML221 failed to affect the proliferation or angiogenesis of normal endothelial cells or APJ-knockout HemECs. Through analysis of the phosphoantibody microarray data, ML221 was revealed to have an inhibitory effect on HemECs by suppressing the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway. These results verified the distinctive expression of APJ in IH and specific inhibition of HemEC activity caused by ML221. In addition, APJ was also detected in propranolol-resistant IH. Collectively, we propose that APJ can act as a specific marker and a promising therapeutic target for IH, which will facilitate further drug development.

Ranugha PS, Seetharam KA. IADVL SIG pediatric dermatology (academy) recommendations on Hemangioma of Infancy (HOI)

Hemangioma of infancy (HOI) is a benign vascular proliferation. Though resolution is the norm, potential complications make an accurate diagnosis and early management of importance. The Indian association of dermatologists, venereologists and leprologists (IADVL) special interest group (SIG) paediatric dermatology in association with IADVL academy did an extensive analysis of the literature on the clinical features, diagnosis, and management of HOI published between 2010 and 2021. Online meetings were conducted from February 2021 to March 2022 to reach a consensus on these recommendations which are made from an Indian perspective.

Management of infantile hemangiomas: Recent advances

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are benign vascular tumors commonly observed in children. A small number of cases can manifest as organ or system dysfunction, permanent scarring, or even disfigurement. Currently, diagnosis is mainly based on clinical history, physical examination, and auxiliary inspection. In the treatment of a hemangioma, the functional damage caused by the lesion and complications that may endanger the patient’s life should be given priority. This suggests that identification, diagnosis, and referral to specialists during the early stages of IHs are important factors in preventing related complications and obtaining a better prognosis. During the past few decades, researchers have explored different treatments according to the condition, including oral or topical drugs, topical drug injections, laser surgery, and surgical treatment. However, oral propranolol remains a well-accepted first-line treatment. This article will primarily focus on the recent advances in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of hemangiomas, along with a literature review on the subject.

Clinical evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization combined with propranolol orally treatment of infantile hepatic hemangioma

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) plus propranolol treatment for infantile hepatic hemangioma (IHH).

METHODS

A retrospective study of symptomatic IHH and hemodynamic changes in IHH was conducted between 2016 and 2019.

RESULTS

There were five boys and seven girls with diffuse lesions (n = 7) and multifocal lesions (n = 5). Hepatomegaly and abdominal distension (n = 6) were the predominant clinical presentations. Seven patients (58.3%) had multiple cutaneous hemangiomas. Pulmonary arterial hypertension, heart failure (n = 4), and hypothyroidism (n = 4) were observed. A total of 17 TAE procedures were performed in 12 IHH cases, with a technical success rate of 100%. All patients received standard propranolol orally, and one patient was orally administered metacortandracin. Two patients died of heart failure and multiple organ dysfunction caused by an enlarged liver. In addition, one patient was not reexamined after discharge. Of the remaining nine children, the average follow-up time was 10.78 months (range 2-28 months), and they all responded well to TAE combined with oral propranolol.

CONCLUSION

TAE combined with propranolol is safe and effective for the treatment of IHH, demonstrating low complication rates.

Medical Management of Infantile Hemangiomas: An Update

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common benign vascular tumor of infancy, affecting about 5% of infants. It has a characteristic growth pattern of early rapid proliferation followed by progressive involution. Although most IH evolve favorably, complications are observed in 10-15% of cases, justifying treatment. For over 10 years now, propranolol has become the first-line therapy for complicated IH, revolutionizing their management and their prognosis. In this article, we review the clinical features, associations, complications/sequelae and therapeutic approaches for IH, focusing on current medical therapy. Indications for treatment and various treatment options, including propranolol and other oral β-blockers, topical timolol, and corticosteroids are presented. Current controversies regarding oral propranolol such as pre-treatment screening, in- vs out-patient initiation of treatment, early and potential long-term side effects and recommended monitoring are discussed.

Infantile hemangioma. Part 2: Management

The majority of infantile hemangiomas (IH) can be managed conservatively, but for those requiring active treatment, management has been revolutionized in the last decade by the discovery of propranolol. Patients that may require active intervention should receive specialist review, ideally before 5 weeks of age to mitigate the risk of sequelae. Propranolol can commence for most infants in the outpatient setting and the most frequently employed dosing regimen is 1 mg/kg twice daily. In the future, β-blockers with a more-selective mechanism of action, such as atenolol, show some promise. In recalcitrant lesions, systemic corticosteroids or sirolimus may be considered. For small, superficial IHs, topical timolol maleate or pulsed dye laser may be considered. Where the IH involutes with cutaneous sequelae, a range of interventions have been reported, including surgery, laser, and embolization. IHs have a well-described clinical trajectory and are readily diagnosed and managed via telemedicine. Algorithms have been constructed to stratify those patients who can be managed remotely from those who warrant in-person review during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Infantile haemangioma: 5-year experience at the vascular anomaly clinic

Background

Infantile haemangiomas (IH) represent a common benign vascular tumour affecting the paediatric population. Infantile haemangiomas are characterised by a natural history differentiating it from other vascular anomalies. After a transient proliferative phase in early infancy, the tumour passes through a plateau phase before going into spontaneous involution. In this report, we tried to share our experience over the last 5 years in managing cases presenting with IH at a specialised vascular anomaly clinic.

Main body of abstract

This report included cases of IH who were attending the vascular anomaly clinic during the period 2015 through 2019. Data of all patients attending the clinic were retrospectively examined. Files of 103 cases with IH were available for review. The diagnosis of IH was usually straight forward owing to the typical history and characteristic findings at clinical examination. A significant female predominance was noticed. Generally, IH were more common in the head and neck region (70%). Active intervention was necessary in specific situations (eye occlusion, airway involvement, large lesions with skin ulcerations). Whenever intervention proved to be necessary, propranolol was chosen as the first line of treatment with a favourable response detected in about 90% of cases. Surgery was still a valid option (6%) for lesions amenable to resection; however, we must put in consideration that most lesions will spontaneously regress.

Conclusion

Infantile haemangiomas are common benign vascular tumours of infancy with relatively few complications. Cosmesis is a major concern especially for lesions affecting the face. Propranolol can induce tumour regression in most cases, and generally, a favourable outcome can be anticipated.

Posterior Mediastinal and Cutaneous Back Hemangiomas in Infants: A New Association

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are common vascular tumors. In most cases, a benign course with favorable outcome can be anticipated. IH typically present as cutaneous lesions either with a localized or diffuse segmental distribution. Segmental hemangiomas in the face may be associated with brain and cardiac anomalies (PHACES syndrome), whereas airway involvement has been reported to be associated with hemangiomas in the "beard" area. Multiple cutaneous hemangiomas may be associated with visceral hemangiomas (commonly in the liver). In this report, we present a new association where deep paravertebral hemangiomatous lesions were observed to be associated with cutaneous back hemangiomas in two consecutive cases.

Paediatrics: how to manage infantile haemangioma

Infantile haemangiomas (IHs) are relatively common benign vascular tumours found in the paediatric population. They have varying sizes and involve different depths in the skin leading to various colours, shapes and textures. Although considered harmless in most cases, they may lead to life-threatening complications or cause permanent disfigurations and organ dysfunction. For problematic IHs, the treatment options include oral and topical beta-blockers, systemic corticosteroids, laser treatment, and surgery. In this narrative review, the treatment options for problematic IH are compared and delivered concisely to facilitate the clinical decisions from practitioners, including those in primary care settings. Oral propranolol is currently considered the first-line intervention for problematic IHs. For superficial lesions, there is robust evidence for the use of topical timolol maleate. Systemic corticosteroids are sometimes used in specific situations such as resistance or contraindications to beta-blockers. Surgical excision can be considered in cases requiring urgent intervention such as airway obstruction; this can be done alongside laser therapies for the removal of residual tissue or when reconstructing areas of deformity. The combination of multiple treatment modalities may lead to a more rapid clinical response.

Infantile Hemangioma: An Updated Review

BACKGROUND

Infantile hemangiomas are the most common vascular tumors of infancy, affecting up to 12% of infants by the first year of life.

OBJECTIVE

To familiarize physicians with the natural history, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of infantile hemangiomas.

METHODS

A Pubmed search was conducted in November 2019 in Clinical Queries using the key term "infantile hemangioma". The search strategy included meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, observational studies, and reviews published within the past 20 years. Only papers published in the English literature were included in this review. The information retrieved from the above search was used in the compilation of the present article.

RESULTS

The majority of infantile hemangiomas are not present at birth. They often appear in the first few weeks of life as areas of pallor, followed by telangiectatic or faint red patches. Then, they grow rapidly in the first 3 to 6 months of life. Superficial lesions are bright red, protuberant, bosselated, or with a smooth surface, and sharply demarcated. Deep lesions are bluish and dome-shaped. Infantile hemangiomas continue to grow until 9 to 12 months of age, at which time the growth rate slows down to parallel the growth of the child. Involution typically begins by the time the child is a year old. Approximately 50% of infantile hemangiomas will show complete involution by the time a child reaches age 5; 70% will have disappeared by age 7; and 95% will have regressed by 10 to 12 years of age. The majority of infantile hemangiomas require no treatment. Treatment options include oral propranolol, topical timolol, and oral corticosteroids. Indications for active intervention include hemorrhage unresponsive to treatment, impending ulceration in areas where serious complications might ensue, interference with vital structures, life- or function-threatening complications, and significant disfigurement.

CONCLUSION

Treatment should be individualized, depending upon the size, rate of growth, morphology, number, and location of the lesion (s), existing or potential complications, benefits and adverse events associated with the treatment, age of the patient, level of parental concern, and the physician's comfort level with the various treatment options. Currently, oral propranolol is the treatment of choice for high-risk and complicated infantile hemangiomas. Topical timolol may be considered for superficial infantile hemangiomas that need to be treated and for complicated infantile hemangiomas in patients at risk for severe adverse events from oral administration of propranolol.

Infantile Hemangioma: A Review of Current Pharmacotherapy Treatment and Practice Pearls

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common vascular tumor of infancy, affecting as many as 5% to 10% of all infants. The exact cause is unclear, but specific risk factors, such as low birth weight, prematurity, female sex, white race, and family history are associated with IH development. Most IHs are benign and self-resolving, but a small subset of patients with IHs are at risk of severe or life-threatening outcomes. Systemic and topical β-blockers are effective and safe for use in pediatric patients and considered first-line treatment for both complicated and uncomplicated IHs. Recently published guidelines provide a thorough review of IH and management. This article focuses on IH pharmacotherapy and provides practice pearls to support health care providers in IH medication management.

Treatments for infantile Hemangioma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is common in children, which may bring about cosmetically disfiguring, functional impairment, and exhibiting complications. There had been various therapies and we aimed to assess the efficacy and adverse effects of different therapies through network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science (from database inception to April 11, 2020) for studies assessing the efficacy, success rate and adverse effects. Direct pairwise comparison and a network meta-analysis under random effects were performed. We also assessed the ranking probability.

FINDINGS

A total of 30 randomized clinical trials with more than 20 different therapeutic regimens were identified. Treatment combined propranolol orally with laser could improve the curative effect than monotherapy. Laser with topical β blockers showed more efficiency than others whether in children under 6 months or not. The long-pulsed dye laser might be the best laser therapy. A higher dose and a longer treatment duration of propranolol orally achieved a higher success rate and increased side effects. Plus pulse dye laser with propranolol had the lowest incidence of adverse reactions, such as ulcer, color sink and color reduction.

INTERPRETATION

A combination of β blockers and laser might be the first-line treatment of IHs and a longer pulsed dye laser is preferred.

FUNDING

No funding was received.

Effect of combined low-dose oral prednisone with beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists for refractory infantile hemangiomas: retrospective cohort study in 76 patients

Background

Beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists have been the first-line treatment for infantile hemangiomas (IHs); however, monotherapy may fail to achieve sufficient efficacy for certain patients, especially for refractory IHs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of prednisone and beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists for refractory IHs.

Methods

We studied 76 patients with refractory IHs. After more than one month of insufficient oral propranolol therapy, forty-four patients received additional treatment of prednisone, while thirty-two patients continued to receive beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists monotherapy. The response to treatment was assessed according to hemangioma score values.

Results

The outcomes of patients after combined treatment were significantly better than those with monotherapy of beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists. The age to initiate prednisone was significantly negatively correlated with the improvement in the combination treatment group. The age at initiate treatment showed significant correlation with score variation percentage in both groups. There was no significant difference in the treatment duration observed between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for all patients showed prednisone administration was the most important factor to better overall outcomes.

Conclusions

Short-term addition of low-dose oral prednisone is an effective and safe adjunctive treatment for oral propranolol in contributing to refractory IH. Both early administration and long enough duration would be necessary.

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Infantile Hemangiomas

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) occur in as many as 5% of infants, making them the most common benign tumor of infancy. Most IHs are small, innocuous, self-resolving, and require no treatment. However, because of their size or location, a significant minority of IHs are potentially problematic. These include IHs that may cause permanent scarring and disfigurement (eg, facial IHs), hepatic or airway IHs, and IHs with the potential for functional impairment (eg, periorbital IHs), ulceration (that may cause pain or scarring), and associated underlying abnormalities (eg, intracranial and aortic arch vascular abnormalities accompanying a large facial IH). This clinical practice guideline for the management of IHs emphasizes several key concepts. It defines those IHs that are potentially higher risk and should prompt concern, and emphasizes increased vigilance, consideration of active treatment and, when appropriate, specialty consultation. It discusses the specific growth characteristics of IHs, that is, that the most rapid and significant growth occurs between 1 and 3 months of age and that growth is completed by 5 months of age in most cases. Because many IHs leave behind permanent skin changes, there is a window of opportunity to treat higher-risk IHs and optimize outcomes. Early intervention and/or referral (ideally by 1 month of age) is recommended for infants who have potentially problematic IHs. When systemic treatment is indicated, propranolol is the drug of choice at a dose of 2 to 3 mg/kg per day. Treatment typically is continued for at least 6 months and often is maintained until 12 months of age (occasionally longer). Topical timolol may be used to treat select small, thin, superficial IHs. Surgery and/or laser treatment are most useful for the treatment of residual skin changes after involution and, less commonly, may be considered earlier to treat some IHs.

Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin: abridged Cochrane systematic review and GRADE assessments

BACKGROUND

Infantile haemangiomas (IH) are soft swellings of the skin that occur in 3-10% of infants. When haemangiomas occur in high-risk areas or when complications develop, active intervention is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To update a Cochrane Review assessing the interventions for the management of IH in children.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, AMED, PsycINFO, CINAHL and six trials registers up to February 2017. We included 28 trials (1728 participants) assessing 12 interventions.

RESULTS

We downgraded evidence from high to moderate/low for issues related to risk of bias and imprecision. Oral propranolol (3 mg kg^-1 daily) probably improves clinician-assessed clearance vs placebo [risk ratio (RR) 16·61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4·22-65·34; moderate quality of evidence (QoE)]; we found no evidence of a difference in terms of serious adverse events (RR 1·05, 95% CI 0·33-3·39; low QoE). We found the chance of reduction of redness may be improved with topical timolol maleate (0·5% gel applied twice daily) when compared with placebo (RR 8·11, 95% CI 1·09-60·09; low QoE). We found no instances of bradycardia or hypotension for this comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Our key results indicate that oral propranolol and topical timolol maleate are more beneficial than placebo in terms of clearance or other measures of resolution, or both, without an increase in harm.

Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin

BACKGROUND

Infantile haemangiomas (previously known as strawberry birthmarks) are soft, raised swellings of the skin that occur in 3% to 10% of infants. These benign vascular tumours are usually uncomplicated and tend to regress spontaneously. However, when haemangiomas occur in high-risk areas, such as near the eyes, throat, or nose, impairing their function, or when complications develop, intervention may be necessary. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for the management of infantile haemangiomas in children.

SEARCH METHODS

We updated our searches of the following databases to February 2017: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, LILACS, and CINAHL. We also searched five trials registries and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of all types of interventions, versus placebo, active monitoring, or other interventions, in any child with single or multiple infantile haemangiomas (IHs) located on the skin.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome measures were clearance, a subjective measure of improvement, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were other measures of resolution; proportion of parents or children who consider there is still a problem; aesthetic appearance; and requirement for surgical correction. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 28 RCTs, with a total of 1728 participants, assessing 12 different interventions, including lasers, beta blockers (e.g. propranolol, timolol maleate), radiation therapy, and steroids. Comparators included placebo, an active monitoring approach, sham radiation, and interventions given alone or in combination.Studies were conducted in a number of countries, including China, Egypt, France, and Australia. Participant age ranged from 12 weeks to 13.4 years. Most studies (23/28) included a majority of females and different types of IHs. Duration of follow-up ranged from 7 days to 72 months.We considered most of the trials as at low risk of random sequence generation, attrition bias, and selective reporting bias. Domains such as allocation concealment and blinding were not clearly reported in general. We downgraded evidence for issues related to risk of bias and imprecision.We report results for the three most important comparisons, which we chose on the basis of current use. Outcome measurement of these comparisons was at 24 weeks' follow-up.Oral propranolol versus placeboCompared with placebo, oral propranolol 3 mg/kg/day probably improves clinician-assessed clearance (risk ratio (RR) 16.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.22 to 65.34; 1 study; 156 children; moderate-quality evidence) and probably leads to a clinician-assessed reduction in mean haemangioma volume of 45.9% (95% CI 11.60 to 80.20; 1 study; 40 children; moderate-quality evidence). We found no evidence of a difference in terms of short- or long-term serious adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.39; 3 studies; 509 children; low-quality evidence), nor in terms of bronchospasm, hypoglycaemia, or serious cardiovascular adverse events. The results relating to clearance and resolution for this comparison were based on one industry-sponsored study.Topical timolol maleate versus placeboThe chance of reduction of redness, as a measure of clinician-assessed resolution, may be improved with topical timolol maleate 0.5% gel applied twice daily when compared with placebo (RR 8.11, 95% CI 1.09 to 60.09; 1 study; 41 children;low-quality evidence). Regarding short- or long-term serious cardiovascular events, we found no instances of bradycardia (slower than normal heart rate) or hypotension in either group (1 study; 41 children; low-quality evidence). No other safety data were assessed, and clearance was not measured.Oral propranolol versus topical timolol maleateWhen topical timolol maleate (0.5% eye drops applied twice daily) was compared with oral propranolol (via a tablet taken once per day, at a 1.0 mg/kg dose), there was no evidence of a difference in haemangioma size (as a measure of resolution) when measured by the proportion of patients with a clinician-assessed reduction of 50% or greater (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.97; 1 study; 26 participants; low-quality evidence). Although there were more short- or long-term general adverse effects (such as severe diarrhoea, lethargy, and loss of appetite) in the oral propranolol group, there was no evidence of a difference between groups (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.40 to 123.35; 1 study; 26 participants; very low-quality evidence). This comparison did not measure clearance.None of our key comparisons evaluated, at any follow-up, a subjective measure of improvement assessed by the parent or child; proportion of parents or children who consider there is still a problem; or physician-, child-, or parent-assessed aesthetic appearance.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found there to be a limited evidence base for the treatment of infantile haemangiomas: a large number of interventions and outcomes have not been assessed in RCTs.Our key results indicate that in the management of IH in children, oral propranolol and topical timolol maleate are more beneficial than placebo in terms of clearance or other measures of resolution, or both, without an increase in harms. We found no evidence of a difference between oral propranolol and topical timolol maleate with regard to reducing haemangioma size, but we are uncertain if there is a difference in safety. Oral propranolol is currently the standard treatment for this condition, and our review has not found evidence to challenge this. However, these results are based on moderate- to very low-quality evidence.The included studies were limited by small sample sizes and risk of bias in some domains. Future trials should blind personnel and participants; describe trials thoroughly in publications; and recruit a sufficient number of children to deduce meaningful results. Future trials should assess patient-reported outcomes, as well as objective outcomes of benefit, and should report adverse events comprehensively. Propranolol and timolol maleate require further assessment in RCTs of all types of IH, including those considered problematic, as do other lesser-used interventions and new interventions. All treatments should be compared against propranolol and timolol maleate, as beta blockers are approved as standard care.

Intralesional Bleomycin Injection for Propranolol-Resistant Hemangiomas

Propranolol has been the first-line treatment for alarming hemangiomas. However, some hemangiomas are propranolol-resistant. The authors reported 1 propranolol-resistant hemangioma which was treated with intralesional bleomycin injections. Sixteen months after 3 injections, the lesion still remained stable. Its potential mechanism was clarified by ultrasonic monitoring. Intralesional bleomycin injection can be considered an ideal option in treating propranolol-resistant hemangiomas.

A New Perspective for Infantile Hepatic Hemangioma in the Age of Propranolol: Experience at Baskent University

Propranolol was first used in 2008 to treat hemangioma; its efficacy and safety have since changed the classical treatment indications. Infantile hepatic hemangioma presents as a spectrum of clinical conditions varying from simple asymptomatic lesions to lethal complications. Tufted hemangioma and Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma are congenital vascular tumors that lead to Kasabach-Merritt syndrome. Hemangiomas, like pure arteriovenous malformations, can cause hyperdynamic heart failure, and diffuse nodular-type hemangiomas can present with hypothyroidism. Respiratory problems and hepatic failure can be associated with diffuse nodular-type liver hemangiomas. There is a spectrum of approaches to management, varying from "watchful waiting" to liver transplant. In the age of propranolol, there has been a prominent change in the infantile hepatic hemangioma treatment algorithm. Our suggestion is early treatment with 3 mg/kg/day propranolol plus 1.0 to1.5 mg/kg/day prednisolone in all patients. This protocol is the most effective strategy for type 3 infantile hepatic hemangioma. Approximately one-third of patients with abdominal compartment syndrome in the era before propranolol treatment required liver transplant; this new treatment obviates transplant for many of these patients.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Propranolol and Steroid for Infantile Hemangioma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

There are limited data from randomized clinical trials comparing propranolol and steroid medication for treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH).

Objective

To determine the efficacy and safety of propranolol compared with steroid as a first-line treatment for IH.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical noninferiority trial tested the efficacy and safety of propranolol vs steroid treatment for IH at a single academic hospital. All participants were diagnosed with IH between June 2013 and October 2014, had normal heart function, and had not been previously treated for IH.

Interventions

The participants were randomly assigned to either the propranolol group or the steroid group. In the propranolol group, the patients were admitted, observed for adverse effects for 3 days after treatment initiation, and then released and treated as outpatients for 16 weeks (2 mg/kg/d). In the steroid group, the patients were seen as outpatients from the beginning and were also treated for 16 weeks (2 mg/kg/d).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy variable was the response to treatment at 16 weeks, which was evaluated by the hemangioma volume using magnetic resonance imaging before and at 16 weeks after treatment initiation. While comparing the effect of medication between the groups, we monitored the adverse effects of both drugs.

Results

A total of 34 patients (15 boys, 19 girls; mean age, 3.3 months; range, 0.3-8.2 months) were randomized to receive either propranolol or steroid treatment (17 in each treatment group). Guardians for 2 patients in the steroid group withdrew their consent, and 1 patient in the propranolol group did not complete the efficacy test. The intention-to-treat analysis, applying multiple imputations, found the treatment response rate in the propranolol group to be 95.65%, and that of the steroid group was 91.94%. Because the difference in response rate between the groups was 3.71%, propranolol was considered noninferior. We found that there was no difference between the groups in safety outcomes.

Conclusions and Relevance

Our trial demonstrated that propranolol was not inferior to steroid with respect to therapeutic effects in IH.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01908972.

Systematic Review of the Toxicity of Long-Course Oral Corticosteroids in Children

Background

Long courses of oral corticosteroids are commonly used in children in the management of chronic conditions. Various adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are known to occur with their use. This systematic review aimed to identify the most common and serious ADRs and to determine their relative risk levels.

Methods

A literature search of Embase, Medline, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PubMed was performed with no language restrictions in order to identify studies where oral corticosteroids were administered to patients aged 28 days to 18 years of age for at least 15 days of treatment. Each database was searched from their earliest dates to January 2016. All studies providing clear information on ADRs were included.

Results

One hundred and one studies including 33 prospective cohort studies; 21 randomised controlled trials; 21 case series and 26 case reports met the inclusion criteria. These involved 6817 children and reported 4321 ADRs. The three ADRs experienced by the highest number of patients were weight gain, growth retardation and Cushingoid features with respective incidence rates of 21.1%, 18.1% and 19.4% of patients assessed for these ADRs. 21.5% of patients measured showed decreased bone density and 0.8% of patients showed osteoporosis. Biochemical HPA axis suppression was detected in 269 of 487 patients where it was measured. Infection was the most serious ADR, with twenty one deaths. Varicella zoster was the most frequent infection (9 deaths).

Conclusions

Weight gain, growth retardation and Cushingoid features were the most frequent ADRs seen when long-course oral corticosteroids were given to children. Increased susceptibility to infection was the most serious ADR.

Propranolol was effective in treating cutaneous infantile haemangiomas in Thai children

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of propranolol in treating infantile haemangiomas, the most common benign vascular tumours in children.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective chart review of infantile haemangioma patients admitted to the Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, from January 2009 to January 2015.

RESULTS

There were 53 infantile haemangioma cases treated with oral propranolol. Treatment responses occurred as early as two weeks after propranolol administration in 91.5% of the follow-up patients, with all 53 cases achieving the desired treatment responses two months after propranolol was initiated. No significant differences in treatment responses were found between propranolol as a mono-therapy or as a combination therapy with prednisolone at the two-week (p value 0.13) and one-month follow-ups (p value 0.98). Complications were documented in three cases (5.6%) when the propranolol dose was increased, and these were asymptomatic hypoglycaemia in two cases and one case of hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Propranolol was effective in treating infantile haemangiomas, and combining it with prednisolone achieved no significant differences in treatment outcome. Cases should be monitored for hypoglycaemia and hypotension. More data on using propranolol for infantile haemangiomas are needed, including long-term follow-up studies.

Infantile haemangioma: their presentation and management

Haemangiomas are the commonest type of vascular tumour in infancy. This article summarizes the pathophysiology and classification of the subtypes as early identification of high-risk lesions is essential for consideration of treatment to prevent short- and long-term complications from the condition.