Effects of a nudge-based antimicrobial stewardship program in a pediatric primary emergency medical center

Trend in antibiotic prescription at pediatric primary emergency medical centers in Japan: A multi-center, cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a global issue, and implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in outpatient settings is crucial. Japan has also focused on outpatient oral antimicrobial stewardship programs and difficulties in standardizing prescriptions have led to overprescription in primary emergency medical centers. There is a lack of research investigating the antibiotic prescription status of pediatric primary emergency medical centers and the benchmark prescription rates in pediatric outpatient settings.

METHODS

We conducted a multi-center, cross-sectional study of seven pediatric primary emergency medical centers located in five prefectures of Japan. We retrospectively extracted data from health claims or directly obtained them from charts at each institution and evaluated trends in the antibiotic prescription rate based on the AWaRe classification between April 2016 and December 2019.

RESULTS

Our study included 383,525 encounters, with the most common infectious disease diagnosis being acute upper respiratory tract infection in 93,449 cases (24.4 %). The antibiotic prescription rate during the study period was 7.4 %, representing a decrease of 46 %, from 10.2 % in 2016 to 5.5 % in 2019. The percentage of prescriptions in the Access group increased at all institutions; however, it exceeded 60 % in only three facilities in 2019. The percentage of third-generation cephalosporins varied among facilities, ranging from 1.7 % to 59.4 %, as of 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

For pediatric primary emergency medical centers where antimicrobial stewardship programs are implemented, we suggest 5 % as a reasonable benchmark level for the antibiotic prescription rate. Prescribing the antibiotics in the Access groups less frequently remains a domestic challenge in Japan.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department Observation Unit: Definition of a New Indicator and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Use and Clinical Outcomes

We aimed to define a novel indicator for monitoring antimicrobial use specifically in the Emergency Department Observation Unit (EDOU) and to assess the long-term impact of an institutional education-based antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on the antimicrobial prescribing pattern and clinical outcomes in this setting. A quasi-experimental interrupted time-series study was performed from 2011 to 2022. An educational ASP was implemented at the EDOU in 2015. To estimate changes in antimicrobial use, we designed an indicator adjusted for patients at risk of antimicrobial prescribing: defined daily doses (DDDs) per 100 patients transferred from the Emergency Department to the Observation Unit (TOs) per quarter. The number of bloodstream infections (BSIs) and the crude all-cause 14-day mortality were assessed as clinical outcomes. Antimicrobial use showed a sustained reduction with a trend change of -1.17 DDD per 100 TO and a relative effect of -45.6% (CI95% -64.5 to -26.7), particularly relevant for meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam, with relative effects of -80.4% (-115.0 to -45.7) and -67.9% (-93.9 to -41.9), respectively. The incidence density of all BSIs increased significantly during the ASP period, with a relative effect of 123.2% (41.3 to 284.7). The mortality rate remained low and stable throughout the study period, with an absolute effect of -0.7% (-16.0 to 14.7). The regular monitoring of antimicrobial use in the EDOU by using this new quantitative indicator was useful to demonstrate that an institutional education-based ASP successfully achieved a long-term reduction in overall antimicrobial use, with a low and steady BSI mortality rate.

Decreasing Prescribing Errors in Antimicrobial Stewardship Program-Restricted Medications

OBJECTIVES

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) restrict prescribing practices to regulate antimicrobial use, increasing the risk of prescribing errors. This quality improvement project aimed to decrease the proportion of prescribing errors in ASP-restricted medications by standardizing workflow.

METHODS

The study took place on all inpatient units at a tertiary care children's hospital between January 2020 and February 2022. Patients <22 years old with an order for an ASP-restricted medication course were included. An interprofessional team used the Model for Improvement to design interventions targeted at reducing ASP-restricted medication prescribing errors. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles included standardizing communication and medication review, implementing protocols, and developing electronic health record safety nets. The primary outcome was the proportion of ASP-restricted medication orders with a prescribing error. The secondary outcome was time between prescribing errors. Outcomes were plotted on control charts and analyzed for special cause variation. Outcomes were monitored for a 3-month sustainability period.

RESULTS

Nine-hundred ASP-restricted medication orders were included in the baseline period (January 2020-December 2020) and 1035 orders were included in the intervention period (January 2021-February 2022). The proportion of prescribing errors decreased from 10.9% to 4.6%, and special cause variation was observed in Feb 2021. Mean time between prescribing errors increased from 2.9 days to 8.5 days. These outcomes were sustained.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality improvement methods can be used to achieve a sustained reduction in the proportion of ASP-restricted medication orders with a prescribing error throughout an entire children's hospital.

Trend of oral antimicrobial use after removal of broad-spectrum antimicrobials from the formulary at a pediatric primary emergency medical center

INTRODUCTION

While the effects of the Japanese action plan formulated in 2016 have gradually appeared, the appropriate use of antimicrobials in outpatient settings is still important. We conducted a previous study to recommend appropriate antimicrobial use via monthly newsletters at a pediatric primary emergency medical center (PEC). As a result, the rate of inappropriate prescription of oral third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) decreased by 67.2%. This decrease prompted our institution to change the antimicrobials adopted from 3GCs to first-generation cephalosporins. There have been no reports on the prescribing trend of narrow-spectrum antimicrobials after the discontinuation of 3GCs in pediatric PECs.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, observational study at one pediatric PEC between April 2020 and March 2022. We recorded the total number of patients and oral antimicrobial prescriptions, diagnoses, and descriptions of the electronic health records and evaluated the prescription trends and appropriateness of antimicrobial use after removal of cefditoren-pivoxil and fosfomycin from the formulary.

RESULTS

The total number of patients was 22,744 during the study period, and antimicrobials were prescribed to 496 (2.2%) patients. The proportion of amoxicillin prescriptions among total antimicrobials was high (53.4%). For each prescription, 85 of 259 prescriptions (32.8%) for amoxicillin, 161 of 185 prescriptions (87.0%) for cephalexin, and 17 of 43 prescriptions (39.5%) for clarithromycin were judged to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that after the removal of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and achieving a reduction in the prescription rate of oral antimicrobials, it is necessary to evaluate whether narrow-spectrum antimicrobials are used properly in pediatric PECs.

Comparing the effects of antimicrobial stewardship at primary emergency centers

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial prescription rates tend to be high in outpatient settings and Primary Emergency Medical Centers (PECs) in Japan encounter difficulties in implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). While a nudge-based ASP publishing monthly newsletters reduces inappropriate prescription of oral third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs), which requires considerable effort. Therefore, developing more preferable ASP models in PECs is essential.

METHODS

We conducted a three-center, retrospective observational study. Himeji City Emergency Medical Center (Site A) introduced a facility-specific guideline for antimicrobial stewardship with reference to national guidelines. The Kobe Children's Primary Emergency Medical Center (Site B) provided the results of monitoring antibiotics prescription in a monthly newsletter. The Hanshin-Kita Children's First-Aid Center (Site C) did not perform a specific ASP. Prescription rates for 3GCs were categorized into pre- and post-intervention and compared using Poisson regression analysis. The difference-in-difference method was used to assess the effect of these interventions.

RESULTS

The numbers of patients pre- and post- intervention were 177,126 and 91,251, respectively. The 3GCs prescription rate at Site A, Site B, and Site C decreased from 6.7%, 4.2%, and 6.1% in 2016 to 2.3%, 1.0%, and 2.0% in 2019, respectively. Site B had a greater reduction than Site A and Site C (relative risk [RR] 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-0.82]; p < 0.001, RR 0.71, [95% CI: 0.62-0.81]; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between Site A and Site C (RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.88-1.13]; p = 0.963).

CONCLUSION

A facility-specific guideline was less effective than a nudge-based ASP for decreasing oral 3GC prescriptions in PECs.

Measures Against Antimicrobial Resistance in Children in Japan: Current Status and Future Prospects

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major problem in public health. Japan is addressing this problem with various measures based on the National Action Plan on AMR, published in 2016. In Japan, the fight against AMR is hindered by issues with the health care system, including the lack of a general practitioner registration system, an abundance of private clinics and health care for infants and toddlers being essentially free of charge. As measures against AMR in inpatient care, thorough infection prevention and the Japanese government's incentivization of collaboration in infection prevention among hospitals and regions have helped to improve infection prevention. As measures against AMR in outpatient care, the creation of official Japanese government guidelines on antimicrobial stewardship has facilitated the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in clinics. Another unique measure taken in Japan is incentivizing the nonprescription of antimicrobials for respiratory tract infections and diarrhea. Although Asia is a hot spot for AMR bacteria, the fight against AMR is affected by various factors, including insufficient precautions against nosocomial infections and the absence of surveillance systems. To combat these problems, Japan must take a strong leadership role. AMR is a problem not only at the level of individual countries but on a global scale and should, therefore, be addressed through joint action among nations.

Paediatric Antimicrobial Stewardship for Respiratory Infections in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review

Antimicrobial resistance occurs due to the propensity of microbial pathogens to develop resistance to antibiotics over time. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have been developed in response to this growing crisis, to limit unnecessary antibiotic prescription through initiatives such as education-based seminars, prescribing guidelines, and rapid respiratory pathogen (RRP) testing. Paediatric patients who present to the emergency setting with respiratory symptoms are a particularly high-risk population susceptible to inappropriate antibiotic prescribing behaviours and are therefore an ideal cohort for focused ASPs. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of ASPs in this clinical context. A systematic search of PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted to review the current evidence. Thirteen studies were included in the review and these studies assessed a range of stewardship interventions and outcome measures. Overall, ASPs reduced the rates of antibiotic prescription, increased the prescription of narrow-spectrum antibiotics, and shortened the duration of antibiotic therapy. Multimodal interventions that were education-based and those that used RRP testing were found to be the most effective. Whilst we found strong evidence that ASPs are effective in reducing antibiotic prescribing, further studies are required to assess whether they translate to equivalent clinical outcomes.