Paediatric mitral valve disease - from presentation to management

Long-term outcomes of mitral valve repair in children

Background

Mitral Valve Disease in children presents unique challenges due to the wide range of associated pathologies and the complexities of pediatric cardiac anatomy. Mitral valve repair in this demographic is preferred over replacement due to the drawbacks associated with prosthetic valves in young patients, such as the need for long-term anticoagulation and issues with prosthetic size and growth.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed pediatric patients under 18 years who underwent mitral valve repair between January 2002 and December 2023. Exclusion criteria included patients with atrioventricular septal defects or single-ventricle physiology. Surgical outcomes were assessed using preoperative and postoperative transthoracic echocardiography, with follow-up data analyzed via Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

Results

The study included 47 patients with a median age of 4 years. Surgical techniques varied based on the specific mitral valve pathology. The overall early mortality was 6.3%, and the one and ten-year survival rates were 93.6 ± 3.6% and 91.4 ± 4.1%, respectively. Most patients showed improved or stable postoperative cardiac function during a median follow-up of 105 months. Notably, the rate of freedom from re-operation at ten years was 85.1 ± 6.9%, highlighting the durability of the surgical interventions.

Conclusions

Mitral valve repair in children demonstrates favorable long-term outcomes with low mortality and reoperation rates, particularly when performed at an older age to accommodate growth and avoid the complexities of smaller, more delicate cardiac structures. These findings suggest that mitral valve repair should be considered a viable and effective option for managing pediatric MVD, with a personalized approach essential for optimizing outcomes.

Challenges and Priorities for Children With Congenital Valvar Heart Disease: The Heart Valve Collaboratory

The Heart Valve Collaboratory is a multidisciplinary, patient-centered community of stakeholders addressing complex problems and embracing innovation to help patients with heart valve disease achieve their fullest potential for health. The Scientific Council is composed of cardiologists, surgeons, ex-officio representatives of the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Heart Lung Blood Institute, and representatives from industry partners. In October 2022, this group convened a workshop that included experts from stakeholder groups to address the unmet and clinical needs of patients with pediatric and congenital heart valve disease. The following document includes the discussion and summary of the current state of valve therapy and the needs being addressed for valve development.

Brazilian Guideline for Exercise Testing in Children and Adolescents - 2024

CLASSES OF RECOMMENDATION

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

The Fate of Mitral Valve Surgery in the Pediatric Age: A 25-Year Single-Center Experience

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the natural history of patients after mitral valve intervention in the pediatric age. Methods: This is a retrospective study including all patients who underwent mitral valve surgery from 1998 to 2022. The patients' surgical reports, postoperative records, and ambulatory visits were reviewed. The endpoints of the study were survival and freedom from mitral valve reoperation. Results: Of the 70 patients included in the cohort, 61 patients (86.7%) had congenital mitral valve disease, of whom 46 patients (75.4%) had a predominantly mitral regurgitation lesion, and 15 patients (24.6%) had a predominantly mitral stenosis. In the mitral regurgitation group, all of the patients underwent valve repair with an operative mortality of one patient (2.1%), and with median follow-up of 4 years (range, 0.5-13 years), there was 4.3% mortality (n = 2) and 71.2% freedom from reoperation. In the mitral stenosis group, 11 patients underwent mitral valve repair, and 4 patients underwent valve replacement. There was an operative mortality of two patients (13.3%). With a 2-year median follow-up (range: 0.1-23 years), there were no additional mortality cases in the mitral stenosis group. All three patients who survived primary mitral valve replacement (100%) and four patients who survived a primary repair (40.0%) underwent reoperation. Conclusions: This study demonstrates encouraging outcomes for mitral valve repair. The mortality of patients with congenital mitral valve disease may also be related to a difficult postoperative course, rather than the MV lesion itself.

Validation of fluid-structure interaction simulations of the opening phase of phantom mitral heart valves under physiologically inspired conditions

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Atrioventricular valve disease is a common cause of heart failure, and successful surgical or interventional outcomes are crucial. Patient-specific fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling may provide valuable insights into valve dynamics and guidance of valve repair strategies. However, lack of validation has kept FSI modeling from clinical implementation. Therefore, this study aims to validate FSI simulations against in vitro benchmarking data, based on clinically relevant parameters for evaluating heart valve disease.

METHODS

An FSI model that mimics the left heart was developed. The domain included a deformable mitral valve of different stiffnesses run with different inlet velocities. Five different cases were simulated and compared to in vitro data based on the pressure difference across the valve, the valve opening, and the velocity in the flow domain.

RESULTS

The simulations underestimate the pressure difference across the valve by 6.8-14 % compared to catheter measurements. Evaluation of the valve opening showed an underprediction of 5.4-7.3 % when compared to cine MRI, 2D Echo, and 3D Echo data. Additionally, the simulated velocity through the valve showed a 7.9-8.4 % underprediction in relation to Doppler Echo measurements. Qualitative assessment of the velocity profile in the ventricle and the streamlines of the flow in the domain showed good agreement of the flow behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameters relevant to the diagnosis of heart valve disease estimated by FSI simulations showed good agreement when compared to in vitro benchmarking data, with differences small enough not to affect the grading of heart valve disease. The FSI model is thus deemed good enough for further development toward patient-specific cases.