Efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma with pre-existing or new bone metastases

Predictive Factors and the Role of Conventionally Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastasis from Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Targeted Therapy

Background and Objectives: Despite rapid advances in targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), bone metastases remain a major problem that significantly increases morbidity and reduces patients' quality of life. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CF-RT) is known to be an important local treatment option for bone metastases; however, bone metastases from RCC have traditionally been considered resistant to CF-RT. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of CF-RT for symptomatic bone metastasis from RCC and identify the predictive factors associated with treatment outcomes in the targeted therapy era. Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2023, a total of 73 lesions in 50 patients treated with a palliative course of CF-RT for symptomatic bone metastasis from RCC were evaluated, and 62 lesions in 41 patients were included in this study. Forty-five lesions (72.6%) were treated using targeted therapy during CF-RT. The most common radiation dose fractionations were 30 gray (Gy) in 10 fractions (50%) and 39 Gy in 13 fractions (16.1%). Results: Pain relief was experienced in 51 of 62 lesions (82.3%), and the 12-month local control (LC) rate was 61.2%. Notably, 72.6% of the treatment course in this study was combined with targeted therapy. The 12-month LC rate was 74.8% in patients who received targeted therapy and only 10.9% in patients without targeted therapy (p < 0.001). Favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p = 0.026) and pain response (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of improved LC. Radiation dose escalation improved the LC in radiosensitive patients. A consistent treatment response was confirmed in patients with multiple treatment courses. Conclusions: CF-RT enhances pain relief and LC when combined with targeted therapy. Patients who responded well to initial treatment generally showed consistent responses to subsequent CF-RT for additional painful bone lesions. CF-RT could therefore be an excellent complementary local treatment modality for targeted therapy.

Metastatic Kidney Cancer: Does the Location of the Metastases Matter? Moving towards Personalized Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been revolutionized over the past two decades with several practice-changing treatments. Treatment for RCC often requires a multimodal approach: Local treatment, such as surgery or ablation, is typically recommended for patients with localized tumors, while stage IV cancers often require both local and systemic therapy. The treatment of advanced RCC heavily relies on immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which are highly contingent upon histological subtypes. Despite years of research on biomarkers for RCC, the standard of care is to choose systemic therapy based on the risk profile according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre models. However, many questions still need to be answered. Should we consider metastatic sites when deciding on treatment options for metastatic RCC? How do we choose between dual immunotherapy and combinations of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors? This review article aims to answer these unresolved questions surrounding the concept of personalized medicine.

Factors affecting local control of bone metastases from radioresistant tumors treated with palliative external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the factors that affect the local control (LC) of bone metastases from radioresistant carcinomas (renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], and colorectal carcinoma [CRC]) treated with palliative external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 2010 and December 2020, 211 bone metastases in 134 patients were treated with EBRT in two hospitals (a cancer center and university hospital). Based on follow-up CT, these cases were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate LC at the EBRT site.

RESULTS

The median EBRT dose (BED10) was 39.0 Gy (range, 14.4-66.3 Gy). The median follow-up time of the imaging studies was 6 months (range, 1-107 months). The 0.5-year overall survival and LC rates of the EBRT sites were 73% and 73%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the primary sites (HCC/CRC), low EBRT dose (BED10) (≤ 39.0 Gy), and non-administration of post-EBRT bone modifying agents (BMAs) and/or antineoplastic agents (ATs) were statistically significant factors that negatively affected the LC of EBRT sites. In the absence of BMAs or ATs, the EBRT dose (BED10) escalation from 39.0 Gy improved the LC of EBRT sites. Based on ATs administration, the LC of EBRT sites was significantly affected by tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation improves LC in bone metastases from radioresistant carcinomas. Higher EBRT doses are needed to treat patients for whom few effective systemic therapies remain available.

All bone metastases are not created equal: Revisiting treatment resistance in renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignancy of the kidney, representing 80-90% of renal neoplasms, and is associated with a five-year overall survival rate of approximately 74%. The second most common site of metastasis is bone. As patients are living longer due to new RCC targeting agents and immunotherapy, RCC bone metastases (RCCBM) treatment failure is more prevalent. Bone metastasis formation in RCC is indicative of a more aggressive disease and worse prognosis. Osteolysis is a prominent feature and causes SRE, including pathologic fractures. Bone metastasis from other tumors such as lung, breast, and prostate cancer, are more effectively treated with bisphosphonates and denosumab, thereby decreasing the need for palliative surgical intervention. Resistance to these antiresportives in RCCBM reflects unique cellular and molecular mechanisms in the bone microenvironment that promote progression via inhibition of the anabolic reparative response. Identification of critical mechanisms underlying RCCBM induced anabolic impairment could provide needed insight into how to improve treatment outcomes for patients with RCCBM, with the goals of minimizing progression that necessitates palliative surgery and improving survival.

Metastatic Lesion of the Tibia from Renal Cell Carcinoma

Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma is responsible for 3% of all cancers, with the highest incidence occurring in Western countries. Additionally, in patients with osseous metastasis, only 3% occur within the tibia. Rarely, a patient presents with a primary complaint of lower limb pain in advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Case Presentation. The patient arrived at the emergency department with a primary complaint of left ankle pain. Ankle X-rays demonstrated a lytic lesion involving the medial malleolus with possible metastatic disease. CT scan confirmed a tumor within the right kidney. The patient was treated with a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with histopathologic confirmation of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Biopsy was then performed of the tibial lesion, confirming metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The tibial lesion was treated with local radiotherapy, and because of the progression of the tibia lesion, a decision was made to amputate the leg. Additionally, the patient was enrolled to sunitinib treatment and was disease free at one year of follow-up. 13 months after diagnosis of cancer, she was suffering a major stroke of the brain that caused her to die.

Conclusion

The treatment of patients with osseous metastases of renal cell cancer depends on the number of metastases, location of metastases, and overall health of the patient. We performed an overview of available literature and provided a summary regarding the use of cytoreductive nephrectomy, local therapy, target therapy, and bone-targeting agents in the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer.

Bone Metastasis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: Risk and Prognostic Factors and Nomograms

Background

Bone metastasis (BM) is one of the common sites of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and patients with BM have a poorer prognosis. We aimed to develop two nomograms to quantify the risk of BM and predict the prognosis of RCC patients with BM.

Methods

We reviewed patients with diagnosed RCC with BM in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent factors to predict BM in RCC patients. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for BM in RCC patients. Two nomograms were established and evaluated by calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The study included 37,554 patients diagnosed with RCC in the SEER database, 537 of whom were BM patients. BM's risk factors included sex, tumor size, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, brain metastasis, N stage, T stage, histologic type, and grade in RCC patients. Currently, independent prognostic factors for RCC with BM included grade, histologic type, N stage, surgery, brain metastasis, and lung metastasis. The calibration curve, ROC curve, and DCA showed good performance for diagnostic and prognostic nomograms.

Conclusions

Nomograms were established to predict the risk of BM in RCC and the prognosis of RCC with BM, separately. These nomograms strengthen each patient's prognosis-based decision making, which is critical in improving the prognosis of patients.

Comparing the Responses of Osseous Versus Soft-Tissue Metastases of Renal Cell Carcinoma to Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors and receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) have changed the standard of care for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Anecdotal evidence suggests these therapies may be less effective for treating bone than soft-tissue metastases. PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective review evaluating the relative clinical responses in soft-tissue and bone metastases in patients undergoing therapy using RTKIs and anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) agents for mRCC. METHODS: Of the 2,212 patients in our institutional cancer registry with renal cell carcinoma (1997–2017), 68 (82 disease courses) were identified with measurable bone and soft-tissue metastases treated with RTKIs and/or PD-1s. Extent of metastasis was quantified at the time of therapy initiation (baseline) and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Changes in disease status were categorized as complete response, partial response, stable, mixed, or progression of disease according to RECIST v1.1 and MD Anderson criteria. These categories were further organized into “response to treatment” or “evidence of progression” to generate a generalized linear effects model with soft-tissue response as the independent variable and bone response as the dependent variable. Alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: Soft-tissue response correlated with bone response at 3 months (76 disease courses, p = 0.005) and 6 months (48 disease courses, p = 0.017). Of the patients with controlled soft-tissue disease, only 14 (19%) and 15 (32%) had progression in bone at 3 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Contrary to anecdotal reports, osseous metastases do not appear to respond worse than soft-tissue metastases to treatment with these agents.

Bone metastases and age are associated with earlier dose reductions in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients treated with angiogenesis inhibitors

Background: Metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) patients with bone metastases (BM) treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have a poorer outcome compared to patients without BM. We aimed to investigate whether an increased incidence of VEGFR-TKI treatment interruptions and/or dose reductions in patients with BM could explain this difference in outcome. Patients and methods: Retrospective study on m-ccRCC patients treated in first-line with VEGFR-TKI. Analysis of the incidence of treatment interruptions and dose reductions and time-to-event analysis. Study of the correlation with the presence of BM at start of first-line VEGFR-TKIs. Results: Two-hundred-and-five patients were included. In patients with BM, median time-to-dose-reduction was significantly shorter (3 versus 5 cycles; p = 0.005) than in patients without BM. 63% of the total number of cycles was administered at reduced dose, compared to 41% in patients without BM. Age at start of VEGFR-TKI (≤ versus >70 years) was significantly associated with median time-to-dose-reduction (5 versus 3 cycles; p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, the presence of BM (p = 0.004; HR 1.82, 95%CI 1.21-2.73) and age at start of VEGFR-TKIs (p = 0.017; HR 1.65, 95%CI 1.10-2.50) were independently associated with time-to-dose-reduction. Conclusion: In m-ccRCC patients treated with VEGFR-TKIs, dose reductions occurred earlier in patients with BM compared to patients without BM and in elderly patients.

An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma

Bone is a major site of haematogenous tumour cell spread in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and most patients with RCC will develop painful and functionally disabling bone metastases at advanced disease stages. The prognosis of these patients is generally poor and the treatment is, therefore, aimed at palliation. However, RCC-associated bone metastases can be curable in select patients. Current data support a multimodal management strategy that includes wide resection of lesions, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and other local treatment options, which can improve quality of life and survival. Nevertheless, the optimal approach for metastatic bone disease in RCC has not yet been defined and practical recommendations are rare. To improve the management and outcomes of patients with RCC and bone metastases, the International Kidney Cancer Coalition and the interdisciplinary working group on renal tumours of the German Cancer Society convened a meeting of experts with a global perspective to perform an unstructured review and elaborate on current treatment strategies on the basis of published data and expertise. The panel formulated recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with RCC and metastasis to the bone. Furthermore, the experts summarized current challenges and unmet patient needs that should be addressed in the future.

In this Expert Consensus, Grünwald et al. summarize their recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma and metastasis to the bone. They also outline current challenges and unmet patient needs that should be addressed in the future.

Skeletal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: A review

Background

Renal cell carcinoma account for 3% of all cancers, with peak incidence between 60 and 70 years of age predominantly affecting male population. Renal carcinoma is the most common malignancy of kidney constitutes for 80–90% of renal neoplasm with an overall 45% five years survival rate. Majority are diagnosed incidentally during investigation for other disease process of abdomen. Classical triad of gross hematuria, pain and palpable mass in abdomen is rare accounting to only 6–10%. Treatment of early stages of disease i.e. localized disease is partial or radical nephrectomy. Most common metastasis in RCC occurs to lung, followed by bone involvement in 20–35%, lymph nodes, liver, adrenal gland and brain. In metastatic disease median survival rate of patient is about eight months with 50% mortality rate within first year of life, five years survival rate is 10%. Skeletal metastasis are very destructive in patients with renal cell carcinoma compromising bone integrity leading to skeletal related events including pains, impending fractures, nerve compressions, hypercalcemia and even pathological fractures which may require surgical interventions and other therapy. In addition to skeletal complications, presence of bone metastases in RCC has negative impact on progression free survival and overall survival of patients treated with systemic therapies.

Objective

In this review we discuss pathophysiology of tumor metastasis, diagnosis, management and Case examples of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

Incidence of metastatic renal carcinoma is increasing. Overall prognosis of patient with advanced RCC is poor, emphasizing the importance of early detection and prompt treatment of primary lesion in its early stage. Advancement in targeted therapy in recent decades had made some improvement in treatment of SREs and has helped in improving patent's quality of life but still we are in need of further improvement in treatment modalities to cure disease thereby decreasing morbidity and mortality.

•

Renal cell carcinoma account for 3% of all cancers.

•

It is a very destructive that may compromise bone integrity.

•

Most common metastasis in renal cell carcinoma occurs to lung, followed by bone , lymph nodes, liver, adrenal gland and brain.

•

Most common metastasis in renal cell carcinoma occurs to lung, followed by bone involvement in 20–35%, lymph nodes, liver, adrenal gland and brain.

•

In metastatic disease median survival rate of patient is about eight months with 50% mortality rate within first year of life, five years survival rate is 10.

Oncogenic miR-210-3p promotes prostate cancer cell EMT and bone metastasis via NF-κB signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

The primary issue arising from prostate cancer (PCa) is its high prevalence to metastasize to bone, which severely affects the quality of life and survival time of PCa patients. miR-210-3p is a well-documented oncogenic miRNA implicated in various aspects of cancer development, progression and metastasis. However, the clinical significance and biological roles of miR-210-3p in PCa bone metastasis remain obscure.

METHODS

miR-210-3p expression was evaluated by real-time PCR in 68 bone metastatic and 81 non-bone metastatic PCa tissues. The biological roles of miR-210-3p in the bone metastasis of PCa were investigated both in vitro by EMT and Transwell assays, and in vivo using a mouse model of left cardiac ventricle inoculation. Bioinformatics analysis, real-time PCR, western blot and luciferase reporter analysis were applied to discern and examine the relationship between miR-210-3p and its potential targets. RT-PCR was performed to identify the underlying mechanism of miR-210-3p overexpression in bone metastasis of PCa. Clinical correlation of miR-210-3p with its targets was examined in human PCa and metastatic bone tissues.

RESULTS

miR-210-3p expression is elevated in bone metastatic PCa tissues compared with non-bone metastatic PCa tissues. Overexpression of miR-210-3p positively correlates with serum PSA levels, Gleason grade and bone metastasis status in PCa patients. Upregulating miR-210-3p enhances, while silencing miR-210-3p represses the EMT, invasion and migration of PCa cells in vitro. Importantly, silencing miR-210-3p significantly inhibits bone metastasis of PC-3 cells in vivo. Our results further demonstrate that miR-210-3p maintains the sustained activation of NF-κB signaling via targeting negative regulators of NF-κB signaling (TNF-α Induced Protein 3 Interacting Protein 1) TNIP1 and (Suppressor Of Cytokine Signaling 1) SOCS1, resulting in EMT, invasion, migration and bone metastasis of PCa cells. Moreover, our results further indicate that recurrent gains (amplification) contribute to miR-210-3p overexpression in a small number of PCa patients. The clinical correlation of miR-210-3p with SOCS1, TNIP1 and NF-κB signaling activity is verified in PCa tissues.

CONCLUSION

Our findings unravel a novel mechanism for constitutive activation of NF-κB signaling pathway in the bone metastasis of PCa, supporting a functional and clinical significance of epigenetic events in bone metastasis of PCa.

Long-term response to sunitinib: everolimus treatment in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

AIM

The study aim was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma on sunitinib (SU) and SU-everolimus treatment.

PATIENTS & METHODS

After 7 years of enrollment and 9 years of follow-up, 193 consecutively presenting patients (151 men and 42 women) were treated.

RESULTS

A total of 157 patients (81.3%) died and 36 patients (18.7%) survived. Median PFS in 193 SU-treated patients was 14.7 months and OS was 28.8 months. Median PFS was 13.98 months and median OS was 26.67 months in 175 patients treated with SU only or on SU-everolimus.

CONCLUSION

The development of SU-induced hypothyroidism, hypertension, neutropenia and edema was a significant predictive and prognostic factor.

Heterogeneous drug target expression as possible basis for different clinical and radiological response to the treatment of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: suggestions from bench to bedside

Metastatic disease occurs in a significant percentage of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and is usually associated with an overall poor prognosis. However, not all of the sites of metastases seem to have the same prognostic significance in patients receiving targeted agents. Indeed, patients with lung-only metastases seem to present a better survival than patients with other sites, whereas liver and bone metastases are associated with a worst prognosis. Some clinical studies suggest that metastatic sites are more responsive than primary tumors. This event may be due to intratumor heterogeneity in terms of somatic mutations, chromosome aberrations, and tumor gene expression, primarily centered around Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) pathway, such as VHL mutations, HIF levels, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) isoforms, and VEGF receptor levels. Nevertheless, these data do not completely explain the discordant biological behavior between primary tumor and metastatic sites. Understanding the causes of this discordance will have profound consequences on translational research and clinical trials in RCC. In this review, we overview current data on the differences between primary RCC and metastases in terms of drug target expression and clinical/radiological response to targeted agents, thus describing the prognostic role of different metastatic sites in RCC patients.

HIF targets in bone remodeling and metastatic disease

The bone marrow is a hypoxic microenvironment that is rich in growth factors and blood vessels and is readily colonized by tumor cells disseminated from numerous cancers including tumors of the breast, prostate, lung, and skin. The origin of metastatic growth promoting factors for tumor cells disseminated to the bone marrow is derived from multiple sources: the bone matrix, which is a reservoir for growth factors, and cells residing in the marrow and along bone surfaces, such as osteoblasts, osteoclasts, macrophages, and T cells, which secrete cytokines and chemokines. Low oxygen levels within the bone marrow induce hypoxia signaling pathways such as hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), which is regulated by oxygen requiring prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs) and von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor. These hypoxia signaling pathways have profound effects on bone development and homeostasis. Likewise, hypoxic conditions observed in local breast and prostate tumors point to a role for hypoxia-inducible genes in metastasis to and colonization of the bone marrow. This review will explore the role of hypoxia-regulated factors in bone development and remodeling, and how these elements may contribute to solid tumor metastasis to the bone.

Clinical and molecular prognostic and predictive biomarkers in clear cell renal cell cancer

ABSTRACT 

The natural history of clear cell renal cell cancer is highly unpredictable with various progressors and with populations where small renal masses may be accompanied by metastatic disease. Currently, there is a critical need to determine patient risk and optimize treatment regimes. For these patients, molecular markers may offer significant information in terms of prognostic and predictive values, as well as determination of valid therapeutic targets. Until now, only a few of the many identified clear cell renal cell cancer biomarkers have been clinically validated in large cohorts. And only several biomarkers are integrated in predictive or prognostic models. Therefore, a large cohesive effort is required to advance the field of clear cell renal cell cancer prognostic biomarkers through systematic discovery, verification, validation and clinical implementation.

The health care burden of skeletal related events in patients with renal cell carcinoma and bone metastasis

PURPOSE

We examined temporal trends in skeletal related events and associated charges in patients with renal cell carcinoma metastatic to bone. We also identified patient and hospital characteristics associated with skeletal related events and related mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample we abstracted data on patients with renal cell carcinoma who were diagnosed with concomitant bone metastasis between 1998 and 2010. Patients who experienced a skeletal related event were identified and hospital charges were calculated. Multivariate regression models fitted with generalized estimating equations were used to examine predictors of skeletal related events and related in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2010 a weighted estimate of 144,889 renal cell carcinoma hospital visits of patients with bone metastasis was identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, of which 20.8% involved a skeletal related event. In these cases from 1998 to 2010 the inflation adjusted mean yearly costs associated with hospital admission increased by 207% in 2013 United States dollars (estimated annual percent change 8.94%, p<0.001). Conversely, the rates of skeletal related events and skeletal related event associated mortality decreased significantly (estimated annual percent change -1.11% and -2.9%, respectively, each p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence and in-hospital mortality of skeletal related event associated hospitalization for metastatic renal cell carcinoma is decreasing but such charges to health care in the United States are increasing at an alarming rate. These findings highlight the need for cost-effective treatment strategies to prevent or treat these morbid complications.

Are bisphosphonates an indispensable tool in the era of targeted therapy for renal cell carcinoma and bone metastases?

One third of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) suffer from bone metastases. Skeletal involvement in RCC is associated with the occurrence of skeletal-related events, and may negatively impact on the outcome of patients treated with systemic therapies. In patients with RCC and bone metastases, therapies that inhibit osteoclasts, as bisphosphonates and denosumab, are used as adjunct to systemic targeted therapies to prevent skeletal-related events. Data suggest that they may also improve the outcome of systemic targeted therapies. Herein we review the preclinical and clinical data on their use, as well as remaining open questions.

Skeletal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma: current and future management options

Metastasis to the skeleton is common in advanced renal cancer and leads to debilitating skeletal complications including severe pain, increased fracture rate and spinal cord compression. The incidence of renal cell carcinoma is increasing by around 2% per year and recent advances in targeted anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced disease are expected to lead to longer survival times. The clinical management of metastatic bone disease in renal cell carcinoma therefore merits greater focus than hitherto. Bone metastases arising from renal cancer are highly osteolytic and particularly destructive. Fortunately, the continuing development of anti-resorptive drugs is revolutionising the medical management of metastatic bone disease across many tumour types and making a major impact on quality of life. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid is now licensed for use in advanced renal cell carcinoma and appears to yield a greater benefit in terms of reduction in skeletal related events than in bone metastases arising from other tumour types. Drugs which are directed at specific targets in the bone metastasis pathway are in development, including denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, which has recently been licensed in the United States for use in renal cell carcinoma, with European licensing expected soon. This review examines the increasing options for treatment of metastatic bone disease in renal cell carcinoma, with a focus on drug-based advances and progress in the development of existing and new biomarkers to support clinical management.

Treatment outcome and prognostic factors in renal cell cancer patients with bone metastasis

We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes and factors for poor prognosis for patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) bone metastases. Patients with bone metastases at initial diagnosis of metastasis secondary from RCC, treated at our hospital between 1984 and 2009, were retrospectively reviewed and statistically analyzed. Among 214 RCC patients with metastasis, 71 patients (33%) were found to have bone metastases at initial diagnosis of metastasis. The median follow-up was 21.1 months (intra-quartile range: IQR, 9.1-47.4 months). The estimated median overall survival time from the diagnosis of bone metastasis was 27.7 months. The probability of patients surviving at 1, 2, and 5 years was 63.7, 52.2, and 19.3%, respectively. When they were stratified by MSKCC scores, the probability of the median overall survival of the populations classified as favorable, intermediate, and poor was not reached, 32.9, and 10.5 months, respectively (P = 0.002). In addition, poor performance status (PS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.938, P = 0.035) and no prior nephrectomy (HR: 3.008, P = 0.004) were extracted as independent poor prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. All treatment modalities-including radical en bloc surgery, radiation therapy, cytokine therapy, molecular targeted therapy, and administration of zoledronic acid-seemed to contribute to favorable survival. More than half of the patients with bone metastases secondary from RCC were predicted to survive more than 24 months. In this population, MSKCC scores were valid predictors of survival. With increased treatment options, RCC patients with bone metastasis may benefit further from subsequent modalities and/or agents.

Negative impact of bone metastasis on outcome in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to determine whether the presence of bone metastases affects outcomes in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) receiving sunitinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of all patients in four academic centers in Belgium and France who started first-line sunitinib (50 mg/day; 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off) between January 2005 and December 2008. Data were collected on known prognostic factors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic sites. Response and progression were evaluated by computed tomography scan (according to RECIST).

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-three patients were identified. With a median follow-up of 40 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in patients with bone metastases than in those without: respectively, 8.2 versus 19.1 months (P<0.0001) and 19.5 versus 38.5 months (P<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, taking on account platelet count, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, number of metastatic sites, neutrophil count, corrected serum calcium, time from diagnosis to systemic treatment, and the presence of bone metastases, bone metastasis was the independent variable most significantly associated with poor PFS (P<0.0001) and OS (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of bone metastases in m-ccRCC patients has a significant and clinically relevant negative impact on outcome on sunitinib.

Targeted therapies in renal cell cancer: recent developments in imaging

Targeted therapy has significantly improved the perspectives of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Frequently, these new molecules cause disease stabilization rather than substantial tumor regression. As treatment options expand with the growing number of targeted agents, there is an increasing need for surrogate markers to early assess tumor response. Here, we review the currently available imaging techniques and response evaluation criteria for the assessment of tumor response in mRCC patients. For computed tomography (CT), different criteria are discussed including the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), the Choi criteria, the modified Choi criteria, and the size and attenuation CT (SACT) criteria. Functional imaging modalities are discussed, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US), and positron emission tomography (PET).