Non-small cell lung cancer patients with ex19del or exon 21 L858R mutation: distinct mechanisms, different efficacies to treatments

Masked hypergraph learning for weakly supervised histopathology whole slide image classification

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Graph neural network (GNN) has been extensively used in histopathology whole slide image (WSI) analysis due to the efficiency and flexibility in modelling relationships among entities. However, most existing GNN-based WSI analysis methods only consider the pairwise correlation of patches from one single perspective (e.g. spatial affinity or embedding similarity) yet ignore the intrinsic non-pairwise relationships present in gigapixel WSI, which are likely to contribute to feature learning and downstream tasks. The objective of this study is therefore to explore the non-pairwise relationships in histopathology WSI and exploit them to guide the learning of slide-level representations for better classification performance.

METHODS

In this paper, we propose a novel Masked HyperGraph Learning (MaskHGL) framework for weakly supervised histopathology WSI classification. Compared with most GNN-based WSI classification methods, MaskHGL exploits the non-pairwise correlations between patches with hypergraph and global message passing conducted by hypergraph convolution. Concretely, multi-perspective hypergraphs are first built for each WSI, then hypergraph attention is introduced into the jointed hypergraph to propagate the non-pairwise relationships and thus yield more discriminative node representation. More importantly, a masked hypergraph reconstruction module is devised to guide the hypergraph learning which can generate more powerful robustness and generalization than the method only using hypergraph modelling. Additionally, a self-attention-based node aggregator is also applied to explore the global correlation of patches in WSI and produce the slide-level representation for classification.

RESULTS

The proposed method is evaluated on two public TCGA benchmark datasets and one in-house dataset. On the public TCGA-LUNG (1494 WSIs) and TCGA-EGFR (696 WSIs) test set, the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were 0.9752±0.0024 and 0.7421±0.0380, respectively. On the USTC-EGFR (754 WSIs) dataset, MaskHGL achieved significantly better performance with an AUC of 0.8745±0.0100, which surpassed the second-best state-of-the-art method SlideGraph+ 2.64%.

CONCLUSIONS

MaskHGL shows a great improvement, brought by considering the intrinsic non-pairwise relationships within WSI, in multiple downstream WSI classification tasks. In particular, the designed masked hypergraph reconstruction module promisingly alleviates the data scarcity and greatly enhances the robustness and classification ability of our MaskHGL. Notably, it has shown great potential in cancer subtyping and fine-grained lung cancer gene mutation prediction from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained WSIs.

Distinguishing EGFR mutation molecular subtypes based on MRI radiomics features of lung adenocarcinoma brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

To explore the feasibility of identifying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation molecular subtypes in primary lesions based on the radiomics features of lung adenocarcinoma brain metastases using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical, imaging, and genetic testing data of patients with lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR gene mutations who had brain metastases. Three-dimensional radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. The volume of interest was delineated and normalized using Z-score, dimensionality reduction was performed using principal component analysis, feature selection using Relief, and radiomics model construction using adaptive boosting as a classifier. Data were randomly divided into training and testing datasets at an 8:2 ratio. Five-fold cross-validation was conducted in the training set to select the optimal radiomics features and establish a predictive model for distinguishing between exon 19 deletion (19Del) and exon 21 L858R point mutation (21L858R), the two most common EGFR gene mutations. The testing set was used for external validation of the models. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 86 patients with 228 brain metastases were included. Patient age was identified as an independent predictor for distinguishing between 19Del and 21L858R. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the radiomics model in the training and testing datasets were 0.895 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.850-0.939) and 0.759 (95% CI: 0.0.614-0.903), respectively. The AUC for diagnosis of all cases using a combined model of age and radiomics was 0.888 (95% CI: 0.846-0.930), slightly higher than that of the radiomics model alone (0.866, 95% CI: 0.820-0.913), but without statistical significance (p=0.1626). In the decision curve analysis, both models demonstrated clinical net benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics model based on MRI of lung adenocarcinoma brain metastases could distinguish between EGFR 19Del and 21L858R mutations in the primary lesion.

The role of angiogenesis inhibitors associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFRm) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining TKIs with an angiogenesis inhibitor has shown promise in pre-clinical studies. A systematic search of clinical trials found that combining erlotinib (a first-generation TKI) with bevacizumab or ramucirumab (angiogenesis inhibitors) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in EGFRm advanced NSCLC patients compared to TKI alone. However, no significant benefit in overall survival (OS) was observed in trials. Similar efficacy was seen in patients with specific EGFR mutations. Third generation TKIs were used as second-line therapy for patients with the T790M mutation. The combination treatment was associated with a higher incidence of severe adverse events. Overall, combining erlotinib or another TKI with an angiogenesis inhibitor is a safe and effective alternative for first-line treatment in EGFRm advanced NSCLC, particularly in countries without access to osimertinib and for patients with the EGFR L858R mutation.

Inhaled delivery of cetuximab-conjugated immunoliposomes loaded with afatinib: A promising strategy for enhanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment

Afatinib (AT), an FDA-approved aniline-quinazoline derivative, is a first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining it with cetuximab (CX), a chimeric human-murine derivative immunoglobulin-G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has shown significant improvements in median progression-free survival. Previously, we developed cetuximab-conjugated immunoliposomes loaded with afatinib (AT-MLP) and demonstrated their efficacy against NSCLC cells (A549 and H1975). In this study, we aimed to explore the potential of pulmonary delivery to mitigate adverse effects associated with oral administration and intravenous injection. We formulated AT-MLP dry powders (AT-MLP-DPI) via freeze drying using tert-butanol and mannitol as cryoprotectants in the hydration medium. The physicochemical and aerodynamic properties of dry powders were well analyzed firstly. In vitro cellular uptake and cytotoxicity study revealed concentration- and time-dependent cellular uptake behavior and antitumor efficacy of AT-MLP-DPI, while Transwell assay demonstrated the superior inhibitory effects on NSCLC cell invasion and migration. Furthermore, in vivo pharmacokinetic study showed that pulmonary delivery of AT-MLP-DPI significantly increased bioavailability, prolonged blood circulation time, and exhibited higher lung concentrations compared to alternative administration routes and formulations. The in vivo antitumor efficacy study carried on tumor-bearing nude mice indicated that inhaled AT-MLP-DPI effectively suppressed lung tumor growth.

Furmonertinib for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a glittering diamond in the rough of EGFR-TKI

The third-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, have been recommended as the preferred treatment for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among them, furmonertinib shows several advantages in terms of clinical efficacy. Firstly, compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib, furmonertinib was the first EGFR-TKI with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of over 20.0 m (20.8 m) for advanced NSCLC with classical EGFR-mutations. Furthermore, furmonertinib achieved a mPFS of 18.1 m in advanced NSCLC with unfavorable prognostic factors, such as the 21 L858R mutation and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, which is unrivalled by osimertinib. Secondly, furmonertinib is the only FDA-approved EGFR-TKI for breakthrough therapy in newly-diagnosed advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutation. Thirdly, the relatively longer mPFS of 20.8 m was observed in furmonertinib compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib (15.2 m and 15.3 m) in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC with CNS metastases. More importantly, the efficacy of furmonertinib increases within the dose range of 80-240 mg per day. Finally, furmonertinib can be an optional treatment for advanced NSCLC patients who develop resistance to osimertinib or aumolertinib. In conclusion, furmonertinib may be a glittering star in the field of EGFR-TKI, which requires further exploration and expansion.

Primary tumor consolidative therapy improves the outcomes of patients with advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma treated with first-line osimertinib

Background

Patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LAD) inevitably experience drug resistance following treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Objectives

We aimed to analyze the effect of primary tumor consolidative therapy (PTCT) on patients treated with first-line osimertinib.

Design and methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients with advanced stage III or stage IV LAD with EGFR-sensitizing mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation) with disease control after first-line osimertinib. A curative dose of primary tumor radiotherapy or primary tumor resection was classified as PTCT. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with and without PTCT.

Results

This study included 106 patients with a median age of 61.0 years, and of those, 42% were male and 73.6% were never-smokers. Exon 19 deletion was observed in 67.9%, 30.2% had a programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score <1%, 33.0% had brain metastasis, and 40.6% had oligometastasis. In all, 53 (50%) patients underwent PTCT. Patients who underwent PTCT demonstrated significantly better PFS [30.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), 24.1-36.4) versus 18.2 (95% CI, 16.1-20.2) months; p = 0.005] and OS [not reached versus 36.7 (95% CI, 32.5-40.9) months; p = 0.005] than patients who did not. A multivariate analysis showed that PTCT was an independent factor associated with better PFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.49; p < 0.001] and OS [HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.82; p = 0.032]. The PFS benefits of PTCT were consistent across subgroups, and the HR tended to be lower in patients aged <65 years, males, smokers, stage IVB disease, L858R, PD-L1 expression ⩾1%, non-oligometastasis, and brain metastasis.

Conclusion

Of the patients with advanced EGFR-mutant LAD, those who underwent PTCT had a significantly better survival outcome than those who did not. The survival benefits were consistent across different subgroups.

Epidermal growth factor receptor compound and concomitant mutations: advances in precision treatment strategies

ABSTRACT

Epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutations are common oncogenic driver mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The application of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is beneficial for patients with advanced and early-stage NSCLC. With the development of next-generation sequencing technology, numerous patients have been found to have more than one genetic mutation in addition to a single EGFR mutation; however, the efficacy of conventional EGFR-TKIs and the optimal treatments for such patients remain largely unknown. Thus, we review the incidence, prognosis, and current treatment regimens of EGFR compound mutations and EGFR concomitant mutations to provide treatment recommendations and guidance for patients with these mutations.

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is brain metastasis (BM)-prone. We determined the impact of this hallmark, along with EGFR subtype and generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, on patients' outcome. 553 metastatic EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients received front-line EGFR-TKI treatment. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M rate were analysed. BM was observed in 211 (38.2%) patients. BM (HR 1.20 [95% CI 0.99-1.48]; p = 0.053), ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.54-0.93]; p = 0.014) and afatinib treatment (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.66-0.99]; p = 0.045) were associated with PFS. Afatinib-treated patients without BM demonstrated a significantly longer PFS (16.3 months) compared to afatinib-treated patients with BM (13.7 months) and to gefitinib/erlotinib-treated patients with (11.1 months) or without BM (14.2 months; p < 0.001). CNS-only progression trended higher in afatinib-treated patients. ECOG PS 0-1 (HR 0.41 [95% CI 0.31-0.56]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.13-1.88]; p = 0.003), but not BM, were the predictors for OS. BM (OR 2.02 [95% CI 1.02-4.08]; p = 0.040), afatinib treatment (OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.12-0.50]; p < 0.001) and EGFR L858R mutation (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.28-1.05]; p = 0.070) were associated with secondary T790M rate. In BM patients, gefitinib/erlotinib-treated ones with 19 deletion mutation and afatinib-treated ones with L858R mutation had the highest and the lowest T790M rate (94.4% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. BM and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly impact PFS and secondary T790M rate in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, whereas OS was mainly associated with EGFR subtype.

Bevacizumab plus erlotinib versus erlotinib alone for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies showed that the combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib (combination therapy) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) but no overall survival (OS) compared to erlotinib alone (monotherapy) for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) had reported the OS results in 2021. This meta-analysis aimed to include the results of the two RCTs to make a decision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched relevant databases for RCTs on the use of bevacizumab plus erlotinib in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The main outcomes of interest were PFS, OS, and the reported hazard ratio (HR). Fixed-effect model was used to estimate pooled HR.

RESULTS

Total 5 RCTs with 935 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. All studies reached their primary study endpoints including PFS and OS. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy remarkably prolonged PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% confidence interval CI 0.51-0.70; p < 0.00001); however, OS was similar between the two groups (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.08; p = 0.26). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that in deletion within exon 19 (19del) mutation subgroup, the combination therapy could only prolong PFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.76; p < 0.0001) but not OS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.37; p = 1.00), and also in leucine-to-arginine substitution in exon 21 (L858R) mutation subgroup (HR = 0.59, p < 0.0001 and HR = 0.80, p = 0.18, respectively). For patients with brain metastasis at baseline, the combination therapy achieved a significant better PFS than the monotherapy (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.90; p = 0.01), and a better OS with the difference marginally significant (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.02; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib can prolong progression-free survival but not overall survival compared to erlotinib alone in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients. The combination therapy not only can prolong progression-free survival but also has a tendency to prolong overall survival for patients with brain metastasis at baseline.

The Resistance to EGFR-TKIs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application of New Therapeutic Strategies

Almost 17% of Western patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. Del19 and L858R are the most-common ones; they are positive predictive factors for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Currently, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, is the standard first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutations. This drug is also administered as a second-line treatment for those patients with the T790M EGFR mutation and previously treated with first- (erlotinib, gefitinib) or second- (afatinib) generation TKIs. However, despite the high clinical efficacy, the prognosis remains severe due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGRF-TKIs. Various mechanisms of resistance have been reported including the activation of other signalling pathways, the development of secondary mutations, the alteration of the downstream pathways, and phenotypic transformation. However, further data are needed to achieve the goal of overcoming resistance to EGFR-TKIs, hence the necessity of discovering novel genetic targets and developing new-generation drugs. This review aimed to deepen the knowledge of intrinsic and acquired molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKIs and the development of new therapeutic strategies to overcome TKIs' resistance.

Design, synthesis, and docking of novel thiazolidine-2,4-dione multitarget scaffold as new approach for cancer treatment

Novel thiazolidine-2,4-diones have been developed and estimated as conjoint inhibitors of EGFR^T790M and VEGFR-2 against HCT-116, MCF-7, A549, and HepG2 cells. Compounds 6a, 6b, and 6c were known to be the dominant advantageous congeners against HCT116 (IC₅₀  = 15.22, 8.65, and 8.80 µM), A549 (IC₅₀  = 7.10, 6.55, and 8.11 µM), MCF-7 (IC₅₀  = 14.56, 6.65, and 7.09 µM) and HepG2 (IC₅₀  = 11.90, 5.35, and 5.60 µM) mass cell lines, correspondingly. Although compounds 6a, 6b, and 6c disclosed poorer effects than sorafenib (IC₅₀  = 4.00, 4.04, 5.58, and 5.05 µM) against the tested cell sets, congeners 6b and 6c demonstrated higher actions than erlotinib (IC₅₀  = 7.73, 5.49, 8.20, and 13.91 µM) against HCT116, MCF-7 and HepG2 cells, yet lesser performance on A549 cells. The hugely effective derivatives 4e-i and 6a-c were inspected versus VERO normal cell strains. Compounds 6b, 6c, 6a, and 4i were found to be the most effective derivatives, which suppressed VEGFR-2 by IC₅₀  = 0.85, 0.90, 1.50, and 1.80 µM, respectively. Moreover, compounds 6b, 6a, 6c, and 6i could interfere with the EGFR^T790M performing strongest effects with IC₅₀  = 0.30, 0.35, 0.50, and 1.00 µM, respectively. What is more, 6a, 6b, and 6c represented satisfactory in silico computed ADMET profile.

Analysis of non-small cell lung cancer with miliary lung metastasis in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

Miliary lung metastasis is a unique feature of lung metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), indicating hematogenous dissemination. Some studies reported more frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and worse prognosis in these patients. Cases were identified from Chi-Mei medical center cancer registry for the period 2015-2019. Inclusion criteria were NSCLC with contra-lateral lung metastasis harboring EGFR mutation, under tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) prescription. Patients with miliary or non-miliary lung metastasis were enrolled for survival analysis. 182 NSCLC patients were enrolled for assessing time to discontinuation of TKI (TD-TKI), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). 54 patients with miliary lung metastasis had average 13.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.7-15.6] of TD-TKI, 11.4 months (95% CI 9.3-13.6) of PFS, and 21.3 months (95% CI 16.8-25.8) of OS, which were shorter than non-miliary group with marginally statistical significance. In multivariate analysis, miliary lung metastasis had no statistical significance, and other strong prognostic indicators were found including performance status, liver metastasis, EGFR type, and generation of TKI. In NSCLC patients harboring EGRF mutation under TKI prescription, miliary lung metastasis was not a dominant indicator for outcomes evaluation.

Real-world data with afatinib in Spanish patients with treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer harboring exon 19 deletions in epidermal growth factor receptor (Del19 EGFR): Clinical experience of the Galician Lung Cancer Group

BACKGROUND

In clinical studies, first-line afatinib demonstrated efficacy in Del19-EGFR NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional study assessed efficacy and safety of first-line afatinib in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC with Del19-EGFR from Galicia (Spain), with a preplanned analysis by age (<70 vs ≥70 years).

RESULTS

Median age of 46 patients enrolled was 69.5 years (range 37-87). The objective response rate (ORR) was 78.2%, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 20.5 months (95% CI 12.7, 28.3) and median overall survival (OS) of 37.5 months (95% CI 19.2-55.8). Outcomes by age (<70 vs ≥70 years) were ORR of 82.6% vs 73.9%, median PFS of 20.2 months (95% CI 14.8-25.6) vs 24.1 (9.8-38.3), and median OS of 45.1 months (95% CI, 17.0-73.1) vs 33.9 (28.7-39.1), respectively. Median treatment duration was 17.2 months (range 0.4-64.1) with 11 patients still on treatment; 14 patients received osimertinib at discontinuation due to T790M. Grade 3 adverse events included mucositis (n = 7, 15.2%), skin toxicity (n = 9, 19.6%), and diarrhea (n = 6, 13.0%) that were manageable with dose reductions. The afatinib dose was reduced in 31 patients (67.4%) and treatment was discontinued in 8 patients (17.4%) due to adverse events. By age (<70 vs ≥70 years), afatinib was dose-reduced in 13 (56.5%) vs 18 patients (78.3%) and discontinued in 3 (13.0%) vs 5 patients (21.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS in our patients was longer than reported in clinical studies with similar response rates and toxicity, even in older patients, reflecting a good risk-benefit from afatinib in patients with Del19-EGFR NSCLC.

MICROABSTRACT

This real-world study of first-line afatinib in Caucasian patients with Del19 EGFR NSCLC reported durable efficacy and showed that older patients (> 70 years) benefitted from afatinib as much as younger patients. The safety profile of afatinib was as expected, albeit more dose reductions in older patients. Afatinib may be an option for patients with Del19 EGFR NSCLC, even in those who are older.

Liquid Biopsy Analysis as a Tool for TKI-Based Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently evolved with the introduction of targeted therapy based on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with certain gene alterations, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and MET genes. Molecular targeted therapy based on TKIs has improved clinical outcomes in a large number of NSCLC patients with advanced disease, enabling significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS). Liquid biopsy is an increasingly popular diagnostic tool for treating TKI-based NSCLC. The studies presented in this article show that detection and analysis based on liquid biopsy elements such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and/or tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) can contribute to the appropriate selection and monitoring of targeted therapy in NSCLC patients as complementary to invasive tissue biopsy. The detection of these elements, combined with their molecular analysis (using, e.g., digital PCR (dPCR), next generation sequencing (NGS), shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS)), enables the detection of mutations, which are required for the TKI treatment. Despite such promising results obtained by many research teams, it is still necessary to carry out prospective studies on a larger group of patients in order to validate these methods before their application in clinical practice.

Combination of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT Radiomics and Clinical Features for Predicting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung adenocarcinoma based on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT radiomics and clinical features and to distinguish EGFR exon 19 deletion (19 del) and exon 21 L858R missense (21 L858R) mutations using FDG PET/CT radiomics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 179 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. They were randomly assigned to training (n = 125) and testing (n = 54) cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. A total of 2632 radiomics features were extracted from the tumor region of interest from the PET (1316) and CT (1316) images. Six PET/CT radiomics features that remained after the feature selection step were used to calculate the radiomics model score (rad-score). Subsequently, a combined clinical and radiomics model was constructed based on sex, smoking history, tumor diameter, and rad-score. The performance of the combined model in identifying EGFR mutations was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Furthermore, in a subsample of 99 patients, a PET/CT radiomics model for distinguishing 19 del and 21 L858R EGFR mutational subtypes was established, and its performance was evaluated.

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and accuracy of the combined clinical and PET/CT radiomics models were 0.882 and 81.6%, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.837 and 74.1%, respectively, in the testing cohort. The AUROC and accuracy of the radiomics model for distinguishing between 19 del and 21 L858R EGFR mutational subtypes were 0.708 and 66.7%, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.652 and 56.7%, respectively, in the testing cohort.

CONCLUSION

The combined clinical and PET/CT radiomics model could identify the EGFR mutational status in lung adenocarcinoma with moderate accuracy. However, distinguishing between EGFR 19 del and 21 L858R mutational subtypes was more challenging using PET/CT radiomics.

The benefit of anti-angiogenic therapy in EGFR exon 21 L858R mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective study

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 21 L858R substitution benefit less from standard EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, and whether anti-angiogenic therapy was beneficial to the EGFR L858R subpopulation was inconclusive. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the survival benefit and the target characteristics of the anti-angiogenic agent in the EGFR L858R patients in our center, comparing those treated with or without anti-angiogenic therapy (cohort A and cohort B). At the median follow-up time of 31.0 months vs 32.7 months (cohort A vs. B) respectively, Cohort A (n = 58) had a significantly prolonged median OS compared to Cohort B (n = 101) (60.0 months vs.37.0 months, HR 0.51, p = 0.016). Anti-angiogenic therapy significantly prolonged the OS in patients with liver metastases (NA vs.26.0 months, HR 0.17, p = 0.023) comparing to patients without liver metastases (60.0 months vs.37.0 months, HR 0.63, p = 0.129). For brain metastatic patients, anti-angiogenic treatment tended to improve median OS with (65.0 months vs.35.0 months, HR 0.29, p = 0.068) or without brain radiotherapy (73.0 months vs.29.0 months, HR 0.24, p = 0.171). The grade 3 or more adverse events were manageable and consistent with previous studies. Patients with EGFR L858R mutation treated with anti-angiogenic therapy in their course of treatment had a significantly prolonged OS compared to those who had never received an anti-angiogenic agent. Patients with liver metastases might benefit more from anti-angiogenic therapy than those without.

Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.

In a randomized, open-label, phase III NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib-alone in patients with untreated non–small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. Herein, we report the updated survival outcome and long-term tolerability. Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (gefitinib 250 mg orally, once daily) and gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (GCP in a 3-week cycle for six cycles followed by concurrent gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance) groups. At the data cutoff (May 22, 2020), GCP demonstrated significantly better PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .027) than gefitinib. However, the updated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 31.1 to 47.1) and 49.0 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 56.7) in the gefitinib and GCP groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06; P = .127). The OS in both groups was similar for the overall patient population. No severe adverse events occurred since the first report. This updated analysis revealed that the GCP regimen improved PFS and PFS2 with an acceptable safety profile compared with gefitinib-alone. GCP is more efficient than gefitinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for non–small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Central nervous system efficacy of furmonertinib (AST2818) versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer: results from the FURLONG study

INTRODUCTION

Furmonertinib (AST2818) is a pan epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with central nervous system (CNS) anti-tumor activity. We report the CNS efficacy of furmonertinib compared with gefitinib in untreated EGFR sensitizing mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the FURLONG study.

METHODS

FURLONG was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study conducted in 55 hospitals in People's Republic of China. Patients 1:1 randomly received furmonertinib 80mg Qd or gefitinib 250mg Qd treatment. At screening, all the patients underwent brain scan. Patients with asymptomatic steady CNS metastases at baseline constituted this pre-planned CNS subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 358 patients were enrolled in the FURLONG study. In the 133 (37%) patients who had measurable or non-measurable CNS lesions, CNS progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 15.2, 25.3) in the furmonertinib group and 9.8 months (95%CI 7.2, 18.0) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio 0.40 [95%CI 0.23, 0.71]; p=0.0011). In the 60 (17%) patients who had measurable CNS lesions, CNS objective response rate (ORR) was 91% (95%CI 72, 99) with furmonertinib and 65% (95%CI 48, 80) with gefitinib (odds ratio 6.82 [95%CI 1.23, 37.67]; p=0.0277). The least square mean difference of CNS depth of response (DepOR) between furmonertinib and gefitinib was 23% (95%CI 10, 37; p=0.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

Furmonertinib first-line treatment showed superior efficacy in CNS PFS, CNS ORR and CNS DepOR compared with gefitinib in EGFR mutated NSCLC patients with CNS metastases.

An updated network meta-analysis of EGFR-TKIs and combination therapy in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a standard care option in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. TKI-based combination treatment modes show encouraging outcomes. However, it remains unknown which is the optimal treatment as the first-line regimen for these patients on overall survival (OS).

Materials and methods

Randomized controlled trials and meeting abstracts that investigated EGFR-TKIs alone or in combination as front-line care for patients with NSCLC were systematically searched in relevant databases and reviewed. Fixed and random effects network meta-analysis models were used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS), OS, overall response rate, and grade three and higher adverse events (AEs). Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were used to rank treatment effects.

Results

Eighteen studies covering six treatments and involving a total of 4389 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. On OS, the top three treatment were first-generation EGFR-TKIs (1G EGFR-TKIs) plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 88.1%), osimertinib (SUCRA, 65.8%) and second-generation EGFR-TKIs (2GEGFR-TKIs) (SUCRA, 63.3%). On PFS, the top three treatments were osimertinib (SUCRA, 96.0%), 1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy (SUCRA, 67.1%), and 1G EGFR-TKIs plus antiangiogenesis (SUCRA, 48.2%). Two types of TKI-based combination therapy have significantly higher risk of grade three and higher AEs than TKI alone.

Conclusion

1G EGFR-TKIs plus chemotherapy and osimertinib seem to be the two better options as first-line care in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR-mutation. Osimertinib caused the lowest incidence of AEs. However, TKIs-based combination therapy significantly increased AEs.

Design and Synthesis of New Hydantoin Acetanilide Derivatives as Anti-NSCLC Targeting EGFRL858R/T790M Mutations

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), its wild type and mutations L858R/T790M, is overexpressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and is considered an inevitable oncology target. However, while the potential EGFR inhibitors have been represented in the literature, their cellular activity failed to establish broad potency against EGFR and its mutations. This study identifies a new series of EGFRL858R/T790M inhibitors bearing hydantoin acetanilides. Most compounds revealed strong antiproliferative activity in a range of NSCL cancer models (A549, H1975, and PC9), in which 5a and 5f were the most potent. Compounds 5a and 5f possessed potent anticancer activity on H1975 cells with IC50 values of 1.94 and 1.38 µM, respectively, compared to 9.70 µM for erlotinib. Favorably, 5a and 5f showed low activity on WI-38 normal cells. Western blotting and an EGFR kinase assay test proved the significant EGFR inhibitory activity of 5a. Besides, active hydantoin derivative 5a strongly arrested the cell cycle at the sub G1 and S phases and triggered apoptosis in A549 cells. These results imply that 5a could be considered a promising lead compound for additional development as a potential active agent for anticancer therapy.

Development of a Nomogram Based on 3D CT Radiomics Signature to Predict the Mutation Status of EGFR Molecular Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study

Background

This study aimed to noninvasively predict the mutation status of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) molecular subtype in lung adenocarcinoma based on CT radiomics features.

Methods

In total, 728 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were included, and divided into three groups according to EGFR mutation subtypes. 1727 radiomics features were extracted from the three-dimensional images of each patient. Wilcoxon test, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, and multiple logistic regression were used for feature selection. ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model. Nomogram was constructed by combining radiomics features and clinical risk factors. Calibration curve was used to evaluate the goodness of fit of the model. Decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the clinical applicability of the model.

Results

There were three, two, and one clinical factor and fourteen, thirteen, and four radiomics features, respectively, which were significantly related to each EGFR molecular subtype. Compared with the clinical and radiomics models, the combined model had the highest predictive performance in predicting EGFR molecular subtypes [Del-19 mutation vs. wild-type, AUC=0.838 (95% CI, 0.799-0.877); L858R mutation vs. wild-type, AUC=0.855 (95% CI, 0.817-0.894); and Del-19 mutation vs. L858R mutation, AUC=0.906 (95% CI, 0.869-0.943), respectively], and it has a stable performance in the validation set [AUC was 0.813 (95% CI, 0.740-0.886), 0.852 (95% CI, 0.790-0.913), and 0.875 (95% CI, 0.781-0.929), respectively].

Conclusion

Our combined model showed good performance in predicting EGFR molecular subtypes in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. This model can be applied to patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Bevacizumab plus dacomitinib combination therapy for L858R-mutated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: A report of two cases

Dual inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor pathways for the treatment for EGFR‐mutated, metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer is supported by previous randomized controlled trials. However, the use of second‐generation irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) dacomitinib in combination with antiangiogenic therapy has not been reported in the literature. Here, we report the case of a 73‐year‐old man who presented with hemoptysis and dyspnea on exertion and was diagnosed with right upper lung adenocarcinoma with pleural metastasis and L858R mutation. The second case is of a 60‐year‐old woman who presented with low back pain and was diagnosed with right lower lung adenocarcinoma with bone metastasis and L858R mutation. Both patients underwent first‐line therapy with the TKI dacomitinib in combination with bevacizumab. The first patient showed a nearly complete response, and the second patient showed a partial response after the combination therapy and no severe side effects.

Classification and regression tree for estimating predictive markers to detect T790M mutations after acquired resistance to first line EGFR-TKI: HOPE-002

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Osimertinib as first-line treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutations remains controversial. Sequential EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) might be superior to the first line osimertinib in patients at risk of developing acquired T790M mutations.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive patients with EGFR-mutated (deletion 19 or L858R) advanced NSCLC treated with first-line drugs and evaluated predictive markers using classification and regression tree (CART) for the detection of T790M mutations based on patient backgrounds prior to initial treatment.

RESULTS

Patients without acquired T790M mutations had worse outcomes than those with T790M mutations (median OS: 798 days vs. not reached; HR: 2.70; P < 0.001). CART identified three distinct groups based on variables associated with acquired T790M mutations (age, CYF, WBC, liver metastasis, and LDH; AUROC: 0.77). Based on certain variables, CART identified three distinct groups in deletion 19 (albumin, LDH, bone metastasis, pleural effusion, and WBC; AUROC: 0.81) and two distinct groups in L858R (age, CEA, and ALP; AUROC: 0.80). The T790M detection frequencies after TKI resistance of afatinib and first-generation EGFR-TKIs were similar (35.3% vs. 37.4%, P = 0.933). Afatinib demonstrated longer PFS (398 vs. 279 days; HR: 0.67; P = 0.004) and OS (1053 vs. 956 days; HR: 0.68; P = 0.051) than first-generation EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSION

Identification of patients at risk of acquiring T790M mutations after EGFR-TKI failure may aid in choice of first-line EGFR-TKI. Furthermore, afatinib may be the more effective 1st-line EGFR-TKI treatment for patients at risk of developing T790M as initial EGFR-TKI resistance.

Durable response to afatinib in an advanced lung adenocarcinoma patient with an EGFR L858R/G729A compound mutation: a case report

Of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 10-15% are uncommon mutations. Most of the EGFR "major" uncommon mutations have shown responses to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, there is a lack of clinical data for other less common types of EGFR mutations and the response to EGFR-TKIs, occurring either alone or in combination with EGFR sensitizing mutations. We reported a 70-year-old Chinese man with no smoking history who was diagnosed with stage IVA lung adenocarcinoma. An exceptionally uncommon EGFR G729A mutation in EGFR exon 19 was detected concomitantly with EGFR L858R in exon 21 in tumor specimens by next generation sequencing (NGS). This patient obtained limited benefit from icotinib and the increase in symptoms of cough and chest tightness, so we decided to switch the treatment to afatinib. Our patient exhibited partial response to afatinib with progression-free survival of 10 months. Subsequently, an EGFR T790M mutation was detected in the second lung biopsy. Then, osimertinib was administered and the symptoms improved significantly and the progress-free survival was nearly 16 months. Our data suggests that patients with NSCLC who are positive for uncommon EGFR G729A mutations may benefit from treatment with afatinib.

Overall Treatment Strategy for Patients With Metastatic NSCLC With Activating EGFR Mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are standard of care in the first-line (1L) setting for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations. EGFR-activating mutations are a predictive factor for response to EGFR-TKIs. Meta-analyses have shown that patients with exon 21_L858R mutations exhibit reduced sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs, resulting in inferior patient outcomes compared to those with exon 19 deletion mutations, with worse overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response, and disease control rates. Clinical activity observed with 1L therapy with first-generation (1G), second-generation (2G), and third-generation (3G) EGFR-TKIs is not permanent, and resistance inevitably develops in all cases, supporting the importance of overall treatment planning. The introduction of the 3G EGFR-TKI, osimertinib, provides an opportunity to overcome T790M-mediated resistance to 1G, and 2G EGFR-TKIs. Additionally, with the use of osimertinib, fewer T790M mutations are being detected as T790M is not a reported resistance mechanism to 3G EGFR-TKIs. However, there are currently no approved targeted therapies after 3G EGFR-TKIs. In order to further improve patient outcomes, there is a need to explore additional options for the overall treatment strategy for patients, including 1L and beyond. Combination of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors and EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy and EGFR-TKIs may be a potential therapeutic approach in the 1L setting. This review discusses current treatment options for mNSCLC with activating EGFR mutations based on tumor, patient, and treatment characteristics and how an overall treatment plan may be developed.

Ramucirumab Plus Erlotinib Versus Placebo Plus Erlotinib in Patients With Untreated Metastatic EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: RELAY Japanese Subset

Introduction

The phase 3 RELAY global study (NCT02411448) revealed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) compared with placebo plus ERL (PL + ERL) in untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.76, p < 0.0001]). This prespecified analysis evaluates efficacy, safety, and postprogression EGFR T790M rates of RELAY patients enrolled in Japan.

Methods

Patients were randomized (1:1) to oral ERL (150 mg/d) plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg) or PL every 2 weeks. End points included PFS (primary), safety (secondary), and biomarker analyses (exploratory). Plasma samples collected at baseline and poststudy treatment discontinuation were evaluated for EGFR T790M mutations by next-generation sequencing.

Results

The Japanese subset included 211 of 449 (47.0%) RELAY patients (RAM + ERL, n = 106; PL + ERL, n = 105). Median PFS was 19.4 versus 11.2 months for RAM + ERL versus PL + ERL treatment (HR = 0.610 [0.431-0.864]) in the Japanese intent-to-treat population, 16.6 versus 12.5 months (HR = 0.701 [0.424-1.159]) in the EGFR exon 19 deletion subgroup, and 19.4 versus 10.9 months (HR = 0.514 [0.317-0.835]) in the EGFR exon 21 L858R subgroup, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or above with RAM + ERL included hypertension (24.8%, all grade 3) and dermatitis acneiform (23.8%). Postprogression treatment-emergent T790M rates were similar between arms (RAM + ERL: 47%, 9 of 19 patients; PL + ERL: 50%, 20 of 40 patients).

Conclusions

Clinically meaningful efficacy was observed with RAM + ERL versus PL + ERL in the RELAY Japanese subset, with no new safety concerns. Postprogression T790M rates were similar across treatment arms, indicating the addition of RAM did not affect the ERL-associated EGFR T790M rates at disease progression.

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis Predicts the Recurrence in Resected Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring EGFR Mutations

Targeted NGS, widely applied to identify driver oncogenes in advanced lung adenocarcinoma, may also be applied to resected early stage cancers. We investigated resected EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma mutation profiles to evaluate prognostic impacts. Tissues from 131 patients who had complete resection of stage I-IIIA EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed by targeted NGS for 207 cancer-related genes. Recurrence free survival (RFS) was estimated according to genetic alterations using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional regression analysis. The relapse rate was 25.2% (33/131). Five-year RFS of stages IA, IB, II, and IIIA were 82%, 75%, 35%, and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). RFS decreased with the number of co-mutations (p = 0.025). Among co-mutations, the CTNNB1 mutation was associated with short RFS in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 5.4, 95% confidence interval: 2.1-14.4; p = 0.001). TP53 mutations were associated with short RFS in stage IB-IIIA (p = 0.01). RFS was shorter with EGFR exon 19 deletion (19-del) than with mutation 21-L858R in stage IB-IIIA tumors (p = 0.008). Among 19-del subtypes, pL747_P753delinS (6/56, 8.9%) had shorter RFS than pE746_A750del (39/56, 69.6%), the most frequent subtype (p = 0.004).

Comprehensive Comparison Between Adjuvant Targeted Therapy and Chemotherapy for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Background

Chemotherapy has been the current standard adjuvant treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, while recent studies showed benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to comprehensively evaluate the benefit of EGFR-TKI compared with chemotherapy for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after resection from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.

Method

A Markov model was established. Clinical data were based on the phase 3, ADJUVANT trial, where stage II-IIIA, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were randomized into gefitinib group or chemotherapy group after resection. Cost parameters mainly included costs of drugs, examinations, and adverse events (AEs). Effect parameters were evaluated by quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Outcomes contained incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), average cost-effective ratio (ACER), and net benefit. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set as 3 times per capita gross domestic product ($30,828/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to verify the stability of the model.

Results

Patients who received gefitinib had both a higher cost ($12,057.98 vs. $11,883.73) and a higher QALY (1.55 vs. 1.42) than patients who received chemotherapy. With an ICER of $1,345.62/QALY, adjuvant gefitinib was of economic benefit compared with chemotherapy. The ACER and net benefit were also consistent (gefitinib vs. chemotherapy, ACER: $7,802.30/QALY vs. $8,392.77/QALY; net benefit: $35,584.85 vs. $31,767.17). Sensitivity analyses indicated the stability of the model and the impact of utility.

Conclusion

Adjuvant EGFR-TKI application for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients was cost-effective compared with chemotherapy, which might provide a reference for clinical decision-making and medical insurance policy formulation in China.

Durable Response to Osimertinib in a Chinese Patient with Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma Harboring a Rare EGFR L858R/D761Y Compound Mutation

Uncommon mutations account for 10-15% of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in spite of the wealth of knowledge of the clinical significance and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity of these mutations, acquisition of deeper insights is limited by the paucity of case reports and cohort studies of the exceptionally rare mutations, including compound mutations. In the present case, we describe the clinical efficacy of icotinib and osimertinib in a metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patient carrying a highly uncommon EGFR L858R/D761Y compound mutation. The progression-free survival (PFS) with osimertinib treatment was much longer than that with icotinib (19 mo vs 8.2 mo), and the overall survival (OS) has currently exceeded three years. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of durable osimertinib response in an NSCLC patient with a rare EGFR L858R/D761Y mutation.