Effects of a patient-tailored integrative oncology intervention in the relief of pain in palliative and supportive cancer care

Diabetes Comorbidity and Quality of Life in Patients with Cancer: A Prospective Study in an Integrative Oncology Setting

Background: Research on quality of life (QoL)-related concerns among patients with both diabetes mellitus (DM) and cancer is limited. This study compared the QoL-related concerns and characteristics among chemotherapy-treated patients with cancer and DM to those without DM. Methods: Chemotherapy-treated patients were evaluated during integrative oncology (IO) consultations, which included evidence-based complementary therapies recommended by their healthcare providers to address quality of life (QoL) concerns. During these consultations, the participants were assessed for comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus (DM). QoL-related concerns were measured using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Results: Of the 1171 patients referred for an IO consultation, 272 (23.2%) had an established diagnosis of DM. The DM patients were older, presented with more advanced stages of cancer, and had more chronic comorbidities (p < 0.001). While fatigue was the most frequently reported QoL-related concern in both groups, the patients with DM had more severe pain scores in the ESAS (4.9 vs. 4.4, p = 0.022) and lower ESAS well-being scores (5.9 vs. 5.5, p = 0.021). Conclusions: Chemotherapy-treated patients with cancer and DM are characterized by higher rates of comorbidities and report more severe scores for pain and for poorer general well-being. Oncologists and diabetologists should consider referring patients with both diagnoses for an IO consultation to address their QoL-related concerns. More research is needed to understand the impact of IO consultations and treatments on well-being among patients diagnosed with both DM and cancer.

Fine-tuning the needle: analysis of acupuncturist response to alarming events during gynecological oncology surgery

OBJECTIVE

Examining an intra-operative acupuncture/acupressure setting, with real-time "fine-tuning" in response to alarming events (AEvs) during gynecological oncology surgery.

METHODS

Narratives of acupuncturists providing intraoperative acupuncture during gynecological oncology surgery were qualitatively analyzed. These described real time "fine-tuning" in response to AEvs during surgery, identified through hemodynamic changes (e.g., systolic/diastolic arterial pressure); bispectral index (BIS) elevation; and feedback from surgeons and anesthesiologists. Documentation of acupuncturist responses to AEvs was addressed as well.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients in the cohort, 33 had at least one intraoperative AEv (69%), of which 30 were undergoing laparoscopic surgery and 18 laparotomies. A total of 77 AEvs were documented throughout surgery (range 1-7; mean: 2.3 events per patient), identified through increased (63 events) or decreased (8) mean arterial pressure (MAP); increased BIS levels (2), or other hemodynamic parameters (4). Integrative oncology interventions implemented in response to AEs included acupressure alone (59); combining acupressure with acupuncture (10); or acupuncture alone (4). In 54 (70%) events, documentation was provided from beginning to conclusion of the AEv, with a mean duration of 9.7 min, with 32 events including a documented anesthesiologist intervention.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated the feasibility of intraoperative acupuncture with acupressure, with ongoing "fine-tuning" to AEvs identified through objective pain-related parameters (MAP, heart rate and BIS) and real-time input from surgeons and anesthesiologists. Documentation of the intraoperative IO practitioner's response to these AEvs is important, and should be addressed in future research of the innovative integrative model of care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CMC-18-0037 (Carmel Medical Center, June 11, 2018).

Integrative Medicine for Cancer-Related Pain: A Narrative Review

Cancer-related pain (C-RP) is a prevalent and debilitating concern among patients with cancer, with conventional treatments limited in their ability to provide adequate relief, and by the adverse effects associated with their use. Complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) modalities have been shown to be potentially effective and safe for the treatment of pain and related symptoms, when used in conjunction with conventional medications and under medical supervision. An increasing number of oncology centers provide CIM within their conventional supportive and palliative care service, in an "Integrative Oncology" (IO) setting. A large body of clinical research, including systematic reviews and guidelines such as those published in 2022 by the Society for Integrative Oncology (SIO), in collaboration with the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO), support the use of some CIM modalities for C-RP and related concerns. These include acupuncture for general and peri-operative/procedural pain, as well as aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgia (AIA); reflexology or acupressure for pain during systemic therapy for cancer; hypnosis for procedural pain or pain due to diagnostic workup; and massage for pain experienced by patients during palliative and hospice care. Further research is needed, within both randomized control trials and pragmatic non-controlled studies which are more reflective of the real-life IO setting. This review summarizes the evidence supporting the use of CIM for C-RP; the analgesic mechanism of the modalities presented; and the challenges facing IO researchers, as well as the implementation of the 2022 SIO-ASCO guideline recommendations.

Identifying cultural, demographic, personal health and cancer-related barriers to integrative oncology care: a retrospective case-cohort study

PURPOSE

Integrative oncology (IO) provides complementary and integrative medicine within conventional supportive and palliative cancer care. The present study set out to identify barriers to attending an integrative physician (IP) consultation, provided without charge within an IO treatment program.

STUDY METHODS

Electronic files of adult oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy were studied. Patient-related characteristics were examined to identify factors associated with attendance at the IP consultation: socio-demographic (age, gender, country of birth, place of residence, primary language spoken); health- related (BMI, smoking, independent functioning); and cancer- related (primary tumor site, localized vs. metastatic).

RESULTS

Only 257 of the 1912 patients studied (13.4%) attended the IP consultation, with female patients more likely to attend (p < 0.001), as well as younger patients (p = 0.002); those residing outside the Jerusalem municipality (p = 0.008); and patients whose primary language was Hebrew (p < 0.001). Non-smokers and functionally independent patients were also more likely to attend (p = 0.007 and 0.008, respectively), as were those diagnosed with breast/gynecological (p = 0.005) or gastrointestinal tumors (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed a significantly greater likelihood of attending the consultation among females (OR 1.619, 95% CI 1.065-2.460; p = 0.024); younger patients (OR 1.019, 95% CI 1.007-1.031; p = 0.001); non-Arabic speakers (OR 8.220, 95% CI 3.310-20.413; p < 0.001); and patients diagnosed with a tumor other than lung cancer (OR 2.954, 95% CI 1.259-6.933; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Further prospective research addressing socio-demographic, personal health- and cancer-related characteristics of oncology patients is needed to address potential barriers to the provision of IO care within a diverse, equitable and inclusive setting of care.

A randomized-controlled trial assessing the effect of intraoperative acupuncture on anesthesia-related parameters during gynecological oncology surgery

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES

The present study examined the impact of intraoperative acupuncture on anesthesia-related parameters in patients undergoing gynecological oncology surgery.

METHODS

Participants underwent preoperative integrative oncology (IO) touch/relaxation treatments, followed by intraoperative acupuncture (Group A); preoperative IO treatments without acupuncture (Group B); or standard care only (Group C). Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), MAP variability (mean of MAP standard deviation), bispectral index (BIS), and calculated blood pressure Average Real Variability (ARV) were measured intraoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients participated: Group A, 41; Group B, 24; Group C, 26. Among patients undergoing open laparotomy, Group A showed lower and more stable MAP and HR compared to Group B, (MAP, p = 0.026; HR, p = 0.029) and Group C (MAP, p = 0.025). Mean BIS, from incision to suture closing, was lower in Group A (vs. controls, p = 0.024). In patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, MAP was elevated within Group A (p = 0.026) throughout surgery, with MAP variability significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.023) and Group B (P = 0.013) 10 min post-incision (vs. pre-incision). All groups showed similar intraoperative and post-anesthesia use of analgesic medication.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative acupuncture was shown to reduce and stabilize MAP and HR, and reduce BIS in gynecology oncology patients undergoing laparotomy, with no impact on perioperative analgesic medication use. In the laparoscopic setting, intraoperative acupuncture was associated with elevated MAP. Further research is needed to explore the hemodynamic and BIS-associated benefits and risks of intraoperative acupuncture, and the impact on the use of analgesic drugs in response to these changes.

Personalized Medicine in Cancer Pain Management

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have documented pain as an important concern for quality of life (QoL) and one of the most challenging manifestations for cancer patients. Thus, cancer pain management (CPM) plays a key role in treating pain related to cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate CPM, with an emphasis on personalized medicine, and introduce new pharmacogenomics-based procedures for detecting and treating cancer pain patients.

METHODS

This study systematically reviewed PubMed from 1990 to 2023 using keywords such as cancer, pain, and personalized medicine. A total of 597 publications were found, and after multiple filtering processes, 75 papers were included. In silico analyses were performed using the GeneCards, STRING-MODEL, miRTargetLink2, and PharmGKB databases.

RESULTS

The results reveal that recent reports have mainly focused on personalized medicine strategies for CPM, and pharmacogenomics-based data are rapidly being introduced. The literature review of the 75 highly relevant publications, combined with the bioinformatics results, identified a list of 57 evidence-based genes as the primary gene list for further personalized medicine approaches. The most frequently mentioned genes were CYP2D6, COMT, and OPRM1. Moreover, among the 127 variants identified through both the literature review and data mining in the PharmGKB database, 21 variants remain as potential candidates for whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis. Interestingly, hsa-miR-34a-5p and hsa-miR-146a-5p were suggested as putative circulating biomarkers for cancer pain prognosis and diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this study highlights personalized medicine as the most promising strategy in CPM, utilizing pharmacogenomics-based approaches to alleviate cancer pain.

Integrative Medicine for Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Integrative oncology (IO) services provide a wide range of complementary medicine therapies, many of which can augment the beneficial effects of conventional supportive and palliative care for patients with ovarian cancer. This study aims to assess the current state of integrative oncology research in ovarian cancer care.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review the clinical research both supporting the effectiveness of leading IO modalities in ovarian cancer care as well as addressing potential safety-related concerns. There is growing amount of clinical research supporting the use of IO and implementation of integrative gynecological oncology models of care within the conventional supportive cancer care setting. Additional research is still needed in order to create clinical guidelines for IO interventions for the treatment of female patients with ovarian cancer. These guidelines need to address both effectiveness and safety-related issues, providing oncology healthcare professionals with indications for which these patients can be referred to the IO treatment program.

Integrative Medicine for Pain Management in Oncology: Society for Integrative Oncology-ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

The aim of this joint guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and other health care providers on integrative approaches to managing pain in patients with cancer.

METHODS

The Society for Integrative Oncology and ASCO convened an expert panel of integrative oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, palliative oncology, social sciences, mind-body medicine, nursing, and patient advocacy representatives. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials published from 1990 through 2021. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, symptom relief, and adverse events. Expert panel members used this evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 227 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Among adult patients, acupuncture should be recommended for aromatase inhibitor-related joint pain. Acupuncture or reflexology or acupressure may be recommended for general cancer pain or musculoskeletal pain. Hypnosis may be recommended to patients who experience procedural pain. Massage may be recommended to patients experiencing pain during palliative or hospice care. These recommendations are based on an intermediate level of evidence, benefit outweighing risk, and with moderate strength of recommendation. The quality of evidence for other mind-body interventions or natural products for pain is either low or inconclusive. There is insufficient or inconclusive evidence to make recommendations for pediatric patients. More research is needed to better characterize the role of integrative medicine interventions in the care of patients with cancer.Additional information is available at https://integrativeonc.org/practice-guidelines/guidelines and www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

Acupuncture for cancer pain: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline

Background

This study aims to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline of acupuncture in the treatment of patients with moderate and severe cancer pain.

Methods

The development of this guideline was triggered by a systematic review published in JAMA Oncology in 2020. We searched databases and websites for evidence on patient preferences and values, and other resources of using acupuncture for treatment of cancer pain. Recommendations were developed through a Delphi consensus of an international multidisciplinary panel including 13 western medicine oncologists, Chinese medicine/acupuncture clinical practitioners, and two patient representatives. The certainty of evidence, patient preferences and values, resources, and other factors were fully considered in formulating the recommendations. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was employed to rate the certainty of evidence and the strength of recommendations.

Results

The guideline proposed three recommendations: (1) a strong recommendation for the treatment of acupuncture rather than no treatment to relieve pain in patients with moderate to severe cancer pain; (2) a weak recommendation for the combination treatments with acupuncture/acupressure to reduce pain intensity, decrease the opioid dose, and alleviate opioid-related side effects in moderate to severe cancer pain patients who are using analgesics; and (3) a strong recommendation for acupuncture in breast cancer patients to relieve their aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia.

Conclusion

This proposed guideline provides recommendations for the management of patients with cancer pain. The small sample sizes of evidence limit the strength of the recommendations and highlights the need for additional research.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13020-021-00558-4.

Sensing the lightness: a narrative analysis of an integrative medicine program for healthcare providers in the COVID-19 department

Objectives

The research addressing physical and emotional exhaustion among healthcare providers (HCPs) in COVID-19 departments is limited. We examined the impact of integrative medicine (IM) intervention for HCPs working in isolated COVID-19 in-patient departments, addressing concerns and well-being.

Methods

HCPs working in 3 isolated COVID-19 in-patient departments underwent 40-min IM treatment sessions (including acupuncture, manual movement, and/or mind–body modalities) provided by integrative oncology practitioners. The MYCAW (Measure Yourself Concerns and Well-being) questionnaire examined HCP concerns and free-text narratives following IM treatments. Data were qualitatively analyzed using ATLAS.Ti software for systematic coding.

Results

A total of 181 HCPs underwent 305 IM treatments. Narrative themes focused on physical symptoms (primarily pain and fatigue) and emotional concerns, including perceived communication barriers with patients, and reflections on well-being and insights following IM treatments. HCPs reported feeling a sense of “relief” which was likely related to the 3 main effects of the IM intervention: a sense of “being cared for” and treated; experiencing emotional, sometimes spiritual effects of the treatment; and the feeling of relaxation, combined with the relief of pain. Qualitative analysis identified clusters of emotional and spiritual-related keywords such as “calming,” “release,” “relaxation,” and “disengagement” following the first IM session (119 of 181 narratives, 65.7%).

Conclusions

HCPs working in isolated COVID-19 departments reported improved well-being and the addressing of their concerns following IM treatment sessions provided during their work shift. Further research is needed to explore the impact of IM on HCP burnout and resilience in palliative care settings.

Exploring the effectiveness of a patient-tailored integrative oncology program on emotional distress during chemotherapy for localized cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVE

There is a need to explore how patient-tailored integrative oncology (IO) programs reduce emotional distress. This study set out to bridge the IO research gap between non-specific, quality of life-related and specific emotional-related concerns in chemotherapy-treated patients.

METHODS

This pragmatic, prospective and preference-controlled study examined patients attending an integrative-physician consultation and weekly IO treatments during adjuvant/neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for localized cancer. Patients choosing to attend ≥4 IO sessions (highly adherent to integrative care, AIC) were compared to low AIC patients using the ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) anxiety, depression and sleep; and the EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) emotional functioning scale, at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. Emotional distress was assessed by ESAS anxiety and depression, considered as the primary study outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 439 participants, 260 (59%) were high-AIC and 179 low-AIC, both with similar baseline demographic and cancer-related characteristics. At 6 weeks, high-AIC patients reported greater improvement on ESAS sleep (p = 0.044); within-group improvement on ESAS anxiety and; and EORTC emotional functioning. Compared with low-AIC, high-AIC patients showed greater improvement on ESAS depression (p = 0.022) and sleep (p = 0.015) in those with high baseline ESAS anxiety scores (≥7); and ESAS anxiety (p = 0.049) for patients moderately anxious (4-6) at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

High-AIC was associated with significantly reduced anxiety, depression and sleep severity at 6 weeks, especially those with high-to-moderate baseline anxiety levels. These findings reduce the research gap, suggesting specific emotional-related effects of IO.

Impact of a combined integrative oncology and palliative care program on quality of life of patients with advanced cancer

Many oncology centers provide integrative oncology (IO) care, many within palliative care settings. The primary study objective was to examine the impact of IO-palliative patient-tailored program on quality of life (QoL) among patients with advanced cancer. In this pragmatic prospective controlled study, patients with advanced cancer undergoing chemotherapy/palliative care were referred by their oncology healthcare providers to an integrative physician (IP) consultation and weekly IO treatments. Patients with high adherence to integrative care (AIC; ≥ 4 IO sessions/6 weeks) were compared with moderate (2-3 sessions) or low AIC patients (regarded as control group). Outcomes were assessed at 6- and 12-week follow-up with Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) tools. Change in QoL scores (ESAS fatigue in particular) was considered a primary study outcome. Of 225 eligible patients, 153 underwent baseline and 6-week optimal assessment (high AIC, 100; moderate AIC, 22; low AIC, 31). High AIC patients reported greater improvement on ESAS scores for fatigue (vs. low-moderate AIC, P < 0.001), depression (vs. moderate AIC, P = 0.01) at 6 weeks, and sleep (P = 0.007) at 12 weeks. High AIC patients had significantly improved EORTC global health status/QoL at 6 weeks (vs. moderate-low AIC, P = 0.01), cognitive functioning (vs. moderate AIC, P = 0.043), and social functioning (vs. moderate AIC, P = 0.032). High AIC patients had lower rates of hospitalizations at 12 weeks (19% vs. 35% in low AIC, P = 0.02; 44% in moderate AIC, P = 0.003), hospitalization days (vs. low AIC, P = 0.003), and opioid use (vs. low AIC, P < 0.001). High adherence to integrative care was associated with a significant effect on fatigue, depression, global QoL at 6 weeks, and need for hospitalizations at 12 weeks.