Association between compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols and postoperative outcome in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing hepatic resection

Early compliance to enhanced recovery protocol as a predictor of complications after liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery Protocol (ERP) has the purpose of minimising postoperative hospitalisation and expediting the restoration of preoperative patient conditions. This study seeks to investigate the correlation between early non-compliance to postoperative items within ERP and complications in liver surgery.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2022 the ERP was proposed to all consecutive patients undergoing liver surgery. Nasogastric tube removal, resuming oral intake and mobilisation and obtaining an adequate glycaemic control were the postoperative items considered as non-compliance indicators. Data were prospectively collected and analysed.

RESULTS

192 patients were included, comprising 99(51.6%) hepatocellular carcinoma, 58(30.2%) colorectal metastasis and 24(12.5%) benign/other pathology. A minimally invasive approach was adopted in 57.3% of cases. Postoperative morbidities occurred in 44.8% of patients, while major complications in 13% of patients. Cirrhosis (p < 0.001), minimally invasive approach (p < 0.004), early oral intake (p < 0.019) and early mobilisation (p < 0.019) significantly correlated to morbidity at multivariate analysis. The complication rate escalated from 26.9% in fully compliant patients, to 58% in patients with two non-compliance indicators and to 91.2% in fully non-compliant patients (p < 0.001). The same trend was confirmed for major complications (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early non-compliance to ERP postoperative items in liver surgery was significantly associated with overall and major morbidity.

Effect of ERAS-Based Rapid Bladder Irrigation on TURP and HoLEP in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Objective

To explore the positive effect of rapid bladder irrigation in postoperative BPH patients by collecting and analyzing the efficacy and complications of TURP and HoLEP treatments for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) under ERAS care.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 197 BPH patients undergoing surgical treatment at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from April 2022 to February 2024. All patients received rapid bladder irrigation under ERAS care, which involves flushing the bladder with a larger volume of saline solution in a shorter time postoperatively compared to conventional bladder irrigation care. Afterward, clinical data and postoperative irrigation indicators for each group were collected and analyzed.

Results

Patients in the T1 group were observed with larger prostate volume, longer operation time, and more intraoperative blood loss than those in the T2 group, but with shorter duration of indwelling urinary catheters, shorter irrigation time, and shorter hospital stays (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the H1 group saw lower mean irrigation volume and shorter irrigation time than the H2 group. Differences were found between the T1 and H1 groups in terms of mean irrigation volume and irrigation time (P<0.05), Additionally, patients in the T2 group had lower prostate volume than those in the H2 group, with differences in mean irrigation volume and irrigation time (P<0.05).

Conclusion

ERAS concept complements rapid bladder irrigation, which shortens the time to self-care recovery and discharge, thereby facilitating faster postoperative recovery for BPH patients.

Integrating StEP-COMPAC definition and enhanced recovery after surgery status in a machine-learning-based model for postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) contribute to high mortality rates and impose significant financial burdens. In this study, a machine learning-based prediction model was developed to identify patients at high risk of developing PPCs following laparoscopic hepatectomy.

METHODS

Data were collected from 1022 adult patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy at two centres between January 2015 and February 2021. The dataset was divided into a development set and a temporal external validation set based on the year of surgery. A total of 42 factors were extracted for pre-modelling, including the implementation status of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS). Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model with the best performance was externally validated using temporal data.

RESULTS

The incidence of PPCs was 8.7%. Lambda.1se was selected as the optimal lambda for LASSO feature selection. For implementation of ERAS, serum gamma-glutamyl transferase levels, malignant tumour presence, total bilirubin levels, and age-adjusted Charleston Comorbidities Index were the selected factors. Seven models were developed. Among them, logistic regression demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC of 0.745 in the internal validation set and 0.680 in the temporal external validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the most recent definition, a machine learning model was employed to predict the risk of PPCs following laparoscopic hepatectomy. Logistic regression was identified as the best-performing model. ERAS implementation was associated with a reduction in the number of PPCs.

Safety and efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in hepatectomy for liver cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this research was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in hepatectomy patients with liver cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched three databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database, from inception to April 25, 2023. The outcomes were postoperative complications, and postoperative length of stay (PLOS). This study was performed by Stata (V. 16.0) software.

RESULTS

Twelve investigations involving 1,892 patients were included in this study. The ERAS group had lower overall postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.49, I² = 54.89 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.33-0.74, P = 0.00], postoperative Clavien-Dindo Grade 1-2 complications (OR = 0.39, I² = 55.14 %, 95 %CI = 0.23-0.69, P = 0.00), Clavien-Dindo Grade 3-4 complications (OR = 0.56, I² = 0.00 %, 95 %CI = 0.38-0.83, P = 0.00) , pneumonia (OR = 0.34, I² = 0.00 %, 95 %CI = 0.15-0.76, P = 0.01), ascites (OR = 0.25, I² = 0.00 %, 95 %CI = 0.09-0.68, P = 0.01), vomit (OR = 0.39, I² = 0.00 %, 95 %CI = 0.21-0.73, P = 0.00), intraoperative blood loss [mean difference (MD) = 1.69, I² = 0.00 %, 95 %CI = 1.15-2.47, P = 0.01], PLOS (MD = -0.42, I² = 94.87 %, 95 %CI = -0.86-0.03, P = 0.07), duration of abdominal drain (MD = -1.23, I² = 96.96 %, 95 %CI = -2.04 to -0.42, P = 0.00), and hospital readmission (OR = 0.44, I² = 0.00 %, 95 %CI = 0.23-0.85, P = 0.01) compared to the non-ERAS group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with liver cancer treated with ERAS. The ERAS protocol reduces the percentage of overall postoperative complications. Moreover, ERAS does not increase the rate of blood transfusions, hospital readmission, reoperation, or mortality.

Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analytical Comparison With Conventional Care in Terms of Outcomes and Complications

The "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) strategy, a patient-centered, evidence-based approach, aims to reduce surgical stress, maintain physiological function, and expedite recovery. Initially developed for elective surgeries, particularly colorectal procedures, ERAS protocols are now being explored for their potential benefits in the more challenging context of emergency surgeries. The current investigation aims to identify the most useful ERAS components in emergency surgery scenarios by comparing postoperative recovery times, possible health outcomes of patients, and complication rates. Through August 2023, extensive searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Data were taken from nine RCTs, which were prospective and retrospective cohort studies and were used to derive important outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was employed to measure the caliber of research. Effect pooling estimates were estimated using random-effects models. For the investigations, STATA version 16.0 and Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4 were used. Nine studies that addressed the range of ERAS components and outcomes were included. Compared to standard treatment, ERAS procedures generally showed faster postoperative recovery durations. Studies' success or adherence rates differed. Subgroup analyses were necessary due to significant heterogeneity in order to determine potential sources. For emergency colorectal procedures, ERAS methods shorten postoperative recovery periods when appropriately modified and put into practice. However, varying success rates throughout studies showed that, in order to maximize and standardize ERAS protocols for comprehensive advantages, significant thought and further study are required. The meta-analysis suggests that ERAS protocols offer substantial benefits in emergency colorectal surgeries, particularly in reducing postoperative recovery times and complication rates.

The Impact of Improved Compliance With Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Frail Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

Background

Patients with frailty are more prone to have perioperative adverse events, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely adopted to improve perioperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of improved compliance with ERAS on perioperative outcomes in frail patients.

Methods

Geriatric patients (over 65 years) who underwent multi-level lumbar fusion surgery between June 2017 and June 2022 were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to their degree of compliance with the ERAS. Stepwise nearest-neighbor propensity score matching 1:1 cohorts for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classfication and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was performed between groups, namely frail-compliant (FC), frail-noncompliant (FN). Further length of stay (LOS), complications and clinical efficacy were compared between groups.

Results

There were 83 pairs of well-balanced patients with comparable clinical baseline data. It was worth noting that patients in FC group has significant lower overall complications (20.5% in the FC group vs 39.8% in the FN group, P = 0.007), major complications (7.2% in the FC group vs 19.3% in the FN group, P = 0.022) and shorter LOS (11.18 ± 5.32 in the FC group vs 14.45 ± 4.68 in the FN group, P < 0.001) than patients in FN group. In addition, the initial occurrence of ambulation (2.14 ± 1.21 in FC group vs 3.18 ± 1.73 in FN group, P = 0.012) and bowel movement (3.68 ± 1.24 in FC group vs 4.17 ± 1.32 in FN group, P = 0.031) were earlier for patients in FC group than patients in FN group. With regard to clinical efficacy, there were no significant difference between FC and FN group in terms of patients who meet minimal clinical important difference (MCID) for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at postoperative day (POD) 30, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back at POD 30-90 and VAS for legs at POD 30, 90, and 180 follow-up intervals. However, there were significant more patients meeting MCID for ODI at POD 90 and180, and VAS for back at POD 180 between FC and FN group.

Conclusions

In this retrospective cohort study, we found that frail patients with higher ERAS adherence group had a lower incidence of overall complication, mjor complications, and a shorter LOS than their lower ERAS adherence counterparts. In addition, frail patients with higher ERAS adherence had earlier ambulatioin and bowel movement. More importantly, we found there were significant more patients meeting MCID for ODI at POD 90 and180, and VAS for back at POD 180 in higher ERAS adherence than their lower counterparts.

Bringing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery to the NICU: An Implementation Trial

INTRODUCTION

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines are bundled evidence-informed recommendations implemented to improve quality and safety of perioperative care. This study aims to determine feasibility of NICU implementation of an ERAS Guideline for Intestinal Resection, describing clinical outcomes and adherence to recommendations following light-touch implementation.

METHODS

Infants <28 days undergoing laparotomy for intestinal resection in a closed-NICU were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria included prematurity (<32wks), instability, or major comorbidity. Clinical data reflecting 13 ERAS recommendations were collected through chart review. Descriptive statistics are presented as median [interquartile range]. Thirty-day post-discharge outcomes include NICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, surgical site infection (SSI), re-intubation, readmission, reoperation, and mortality. Adherence was calculated as the percentage of patients eligible for each recommendation whose care was adherent.

RESULTS

Ten infant-parent dyads were enrolled (five females; GA 37 weeks [35, 38.8]; birthweight 2.97 kg [2.02, 3.69]). Surgical diagnoses included intestinal atresia/web (n = 6), anorectal malformation (n = 3), and segmental volvulus (n = 1). NICU LOS was 16 days [11, 21], hospital LOS 20 days [18, 30], and 2.5 ventilator days/patient [2, 3]. There was reduced opioid use, no SSIs, one re-intubation, three readmissions, three reoperations, and no mortalities. Adherence to ERAS recommendations ranged 0-100 % with a pooled adherence rate of 73 %.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to introduce ERAS to the NICU with acceptable overall adherence. Assessing adherence was challenging for some measures. There were promising early clinical findings including a reduction in opioid use. This implementation trial will inform development of an ERAS protocol for surgical NICUs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (Cohort Study).

Does enhanced recovery after surgery programs improve clinical outcomes in liver cancer surgery?

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been widely applied in liver surgery since the publication of the first ERAS guidelines in 2016 and the new recommendations in 2022. Liver surgery is usually performed in oncological patients (liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, etc.), but the real impact of liver surgery ERAS programs in oncological outcomes is not clearly defined. Theoretical advantages of ERAS programs are: ERAS decreases postoperative complication rates and has been demonstrated a clear relationship between complications and oncological outcomes; a better and faster postoperative recovery should let oncologic teams begin chemotherapeutic regimens on time; prehabilitation and nutrition actions before surgery should also improve the performance status of the patients receiving chemotherapy. So, ERAS could be another way to improve our oncological results. We will discuss the literature about liver surgery ERAS focusing on its oncological implications and future investigations projects.

Impact of Successful Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are complex operations for the treatment of peritoneal metastases. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are intended to standardize preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pathways, with the goal of improving patient care. This study describes feasibility and outcomes after implementing an ERAS protocol for CRS/HIPEC at a tertiary academic center.

METHODS

A single-institution experience of CRS/HIPEC was reviewed from January 2020 to March 2023. Patients were categorized according to whether they underwent CRS/HIPEC before or after ERAS initiation. Outcomes and protocol adherence were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 115 CRS/HIPEC operations were included-74 before and 41 after ERAS implementation. Median age was younger in the post-ERAS group, whereas sex, comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index, operation performed, and operative time were similar between groups. The most common primary cancer sites were gynecologic (40%), appendiceal (24%), and colorectal (22%). Adherence to all postoperative ERAS components was 76%. More post-ERAS patients ambulated by postoperative day (POD) 1 (90% vs. 54%; p < 0.001), tolerated liquid diet by POD 2 (88% vs. 32%; p < 0.001), and had foley removed by POD 3 (86% vs. 43%; p < 0.001). There was a trend toward decreased length of stay in the post-ERAS cohort (7 vs. 8 days; p = 0.092), with no difference in major complications, intensive care unit admission, or 30-day readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the heterogeneity of CRS/HIPEC operations, implementing an ERAS protocol for our patients was feasible and resulted in postoperative outcomes and adherence comparable with that of other major abdominal surgeries. This supports the potential for success in ERAS programs for CRS/HIPEC patients.

Revolutionizing Surgical Care: The Power of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

The development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has brought about substantial transformations in perioperative care, substituting conventional methods with a patient-centric, evidence-based strategy. ERAS protocol adopts a holistic approach to patient care, which includes all stages preceding, during, and following the operation. These programs prioritize patient-specific therapies that are tailored to their specific requirements. Nutritional assessment and enhancement, patient education, minimally invasive procedures, and multimodal pain management are all fundamental components of ERAS. ERAS provides a multitude of advantages, including diminished postoperative complications, abbreviated hospital stays, heightened patient satisfaction, and healthcare cost reductions. This article examines the foundational tenets of ERAS, their incorporation into the field of general surgery, their suitability for diverse surgical specialties, the obstacles faced during implementation, and possible directions for further investigation, such as the integration of digital health technologies, personalized patient care, and the long-term viability of ERAS protocols.

Enhanced recovery after surgery care to reduce surgical site wound infection and postoperative complications for patients undergoing liver surgery

This study comprehensively assessed the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on wound infection and postoperative complications in patients undergoing liver surgery. The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and Wanfang electronic databases were searched to collect published studies on the use of ERAS in liver surgery until December 2022. Literature selection was performed independently by two investigators according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality evaluation and data extraction were performed. RevMan 5.4 software was used in this study. Compared with the control group, the ERAS group showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative wound infection (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.84, P = .004) and overall postoperative complication rate (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.57, P < .001) and significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean difference: -2.30, 95% CI: -2.92 to -1.68, P < .001). Therefore, ERAS was safe and feasible when applied to liver resection, reducing the incidence of wound infection and total postoperative complications, and shortening the length of hospital stay. However, further studies are required to investigate the impact of ERAS protocols on clinical outcomes.

Knowledge, Implementation, and Perception of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Amongst Surgeons in Pakistan: A Survey Analysis

INTRODUCTION

An increasing shift towards non-communicable diseases and an existing high surgical burden of disease in low-middle-income countries (LMICs), such as Pakistan, has driven the need for implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), a safe and cost-effective surgical service aimed at improving patient recovery and reducing post-operative complications. Despite countless benefits, there are few ERAS programs throughout Pakistan and sparse literature on healthcare professionals' views regarding ERAS. Without a deep understanding of healthcare professionals' perspectives on ERAS, underlying barriers and facilitators to a long-term ERAS implementation cannot be addressed and improved upon. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to better understand the knowledge, implementation, and perception of ERAS from the perspective of healthcare professionals across Pakistan.

METHODS

Upon receiving ethical approval from the McGill University Health Center (MUHC), a previously validated questionnaire was modified and a 29-question survey was developed and disseminated to healthcare professionals practising in Pakistan. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and potential correlations that exist between the implementation of ERAS and the participants' gender, employment setting, and surgical specialty were investigated using the chi-squared analysis with a p-value of 0.05 as the cutoff.

RESULTS

A total of 49 participants responded to this survey of whom 34 (69%) worked at a tertiary care teaching hospital whereas 15 (31%) worked at a private hospital. Surprisingly, 42 (85%) participants expressed being aware of the ERAS guidelines with only 30 (61%) either strongly agreeing or agreeing to successfully implementing ERAS into practice. The largest discrepancies in implementation were seen when discussing specific elements of the ERAS guidelines such as preoperative carbohydrate loading, practicing prolonged preoperative fasting, performing mechanical bowel preparation, performing active patient warming, and early postoperative removal of Foley's catheter. Surgeons employed at a private institution were more likely to discuss postoperative pain management and control, less likely to utilize prolonged fasting, more likely to perform regular body temperature monitoring, more likely to practice providing chewing gum to patients postoperatively, and more likely to perform early removal of the Foley's catheter.

CONCLUSION

An understanding of ERAS, the implementation of various elements, and a positive attitude toward its benefits definitely seem to be prevalent among healthcare professionals in Pakistan. However, key barriers and enablers specific to the underlying healthcare environment seem to be hindering the long-term successful implementation of ERAS across Pakistan. It is crucial for future studies to explore these barriers in further detail and involve the perspective of these key stakeholders to help enhance long-term ERAS adoption.

Initial Clinical Application of Enhanced Recovery After Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy

Background: The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol has been widely adopted across various surgical subspecialties. Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) has grown in popularity in the past decade. Therefore, this study aimed to discuss the initial application of ERAS in TORT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 95 patients who had undergone TORT in our department from April 2020 to March 2022. All patients were treated using the ERAS protocol. Results: TORT was successfully performed in all 95 patients. Postoperative histopathological examination revealed papillary carcinoma. The average operative time, hemorrhage volume, length of postoperative stay, and pain score (24 hours after surgery) were 227.32 ± 44.37 minutes, 35.81 ± 23.45 mL, 1.37 ± 0.62 days, and 2.11 ± 0.54, respectively. Sixty patients received an analgesia pump, with no significant difference in pain scores between the patients with and without the pump (P > .05). Eight patients experienced transient mandibular numbness, and two experienced transient hoarseness postoperatively. Of the 24 cases of total thyroidectomy/bilateral subtotal thyroidectomy (ST) or lobectomy with isthmusectomy plus contralateral ST patients, 8 developed transient hypoparathyroidism. No common complications, such as incision infection, hematoma/effusion formation, coughing while drinking, or permanent hoarseness/hypocalcemia, were reported. Conclusion: Our initial outcomes demonstrate that implementing an ERAS protocol in TORT is safe and feasible.

The influence of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol adherence in patients undergoing elective neuro-oncological craniotomies

Objectives

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have reduced the length of hospital stay (LOS) and healthcare costs without increasing adverse outcomes. We describe the impact of adherence to an ERAS protocol for elective craniotomy among neuro-oncology patients at a single institution.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled adult patients who underwent elective craniotomy and the ERAS protocol at our institute between January 2020 and April 2021. The patients were divided into high- and low-adherence groups depending on their adherence to ≥9 or <9 of the 16 items, respectively. Inferential statistics were used to compare group outcomes, and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors related to delayed discharge (LOS>7 days).

Results

Among the 100 patients assessed, median adherence was 8 items (range, 4-16), and 55 and 45 patients were classified into the high- and low-adherence groups, respectively. Age, sex, comorbidities, brain pathology, and operative profiles were comparable at baseline. The high-adherence group showed significantly better outcomes, including shorter median LOS (8 days vs. 11 days; p ​= ​0.002) and lower median hospital costs (131,657.5 baht vs. 152,974 baht; p ​= ​0.005). The groups showed no differences in 30-day postoperative complications or Karnofsky performance status. In the multivariable analysis, high adherence to the ERAS protocol (>50%) was the only significant factor preventing delayed discharge (OR ​= ​0.28; 95% CI ​= ​0.10 to 0.78; p ​= ​0.04).

Conclusions

High adherence to ERAS protocols showed a strong association with short hospital stays and cost reductions. Our ERAS protocol was feasible and safe for patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in primary liver cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy: experience from a large tertiary hospital in China

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has significant effects in gastrointestinal surgery, urology, and orthopedic department, but the application of ERAS in liver cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy is less reported. This study aims to identify the effectiveness and safety of ERAS in liver cancer patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

Patients who performed ERAS and no-ERAS after hepatectomy due to liver cancer from 2019 to 2022 were prospectively and retrospectively collected, respectively. Preoperative baseline data, surgical characteristics, and postoperative outcomes of patients in ERAS and non-ERAS groups were compared and analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors of complications occurrence and prolonged hospital stay.

RESULTS

In total, 318 patients were included in the study, 150 and 168 individuals in the ERAS group and non-ERAS group, respectively. The preoperative baseline and surgical characteristics between the ERAS and non-ERAS groups were comparable and not statistically different. Postoperative visual analogue scale pain score, the median day of gastrointestinal function recovery postoperative, complications rate, and postoperative hospitalization days were lower in the ERAS group than in the non-ERAS group. In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis found that the implementation of the ERAS was an independent protective factor for prolonged hospitalization stay and complications occurrence. The rate of rehospitalization after discharge (< 30 days) in the ERAS group was lower than that in the non-ERAS group, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of ERAS in hepatectomy for patients with liver cancer is safe and effective. It can accelerate gastrointestinal function recovery postoperative, shorten the length of hospital stay, and reduce postoperative pain and complications.

The effect of the enhanced recovery programme on long-term survival following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery programmes are associated with improved short-term outcomes following liver surgery. The impact of enhanced recovery programmes on medium- and long-term outcomes is incompletely understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on long-term survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

At a tertiary hepatobiliary centre, we analysed short-, medium- and long-term outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. A five-year retrospective review was carried out comparing the enhanced recovery programme to standard care.

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were included in the analysis: 87 on standard care and 85 on an enhanced recovery programme. Open surgery was performed in 122 patients: 74 (85.1%) and 48 (56.5%) patients in the standard care and enhanced recovery programme, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in the median (IQR) length of hospital stay in the enhanced recovery programme compared with standard care (7 (5) days vs. 8 (3) days, p = 0.0009). There was no significant difference in survival between standard care and the Enhanced Recovery Programme at one (p = 0.818), three (p = 0.203), and five years (p = 0.247).

CONCLUSION

An enhanced recovery programme was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay. There was no effect on the one-, three- and five-year survival.

Robotic approach together with an enhanced recovery programme improve the perioperative outcomes for complex hepatectomy

Objective

Robotic surgery has more advantages than traditional surgical approaches to complex liver resection; however, the robotic approach is invariably associated with increased cost. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are beneficial in conventional surgeries.

Methods

The present study investigated the effects of robotic surgery combined with an ERAS protocol on perioperative outcomes and hospitalization costs of patients undergoing complex hepatectomy. Clinical data from consecutive robotic and open liver resections (RLR and OLR, respectively) performed in our unit in the pre-ERAS (January 2019-June 2020) and ERAS (July 2020-December 2021) periods were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of ERAS and surgical approaches-alone or in combination-on LOS and costs.

Results

A total of 171 consecutive complex liver resections were analyzed. ERAS patients had a shorter median LOS and decreased total hospitalization cost, without a significant difference in the complication rate compared with the pre-ERAS cohort. RLR patients had a shorter median LOS and decreased major complications, but with increased total hospitalization cost, compared with OLR patients. Comparing the four combinations of perioperative management and surgical approaches, ERAS + RLR had the shortest LOS and the fewest major complications, whereas pre-ERAS + RLR had the highest hospitalization costs. Multivariate analysis found that the robotic approach was protective against prolonged LOS, whereas the ERAS pathway was protective against high costs.

Conclusions

The ERAS + RLR approach optimized postoperative complex liver resection outcomes and hospitalization costs compared with other combinations. The robotic approach combined with ERAS synergistically optimized outcome and overall cost compared with other strategies, and may be the best combination for optimizing perioperative outcomes for complex RLR.