Statins and the risk of gastric, colorectal, and esophageal cancer incidence and mortality: a cohort study based on data from the Korean national health insurance claims database

Impact of Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Agents on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Patients with Fatty Liver Disease and Diabetes

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, and antiplatelet medications on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in patients with fatty liver disease (FLD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHOD

Using data from Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, 212,443 FLD-T2D patients were analyzed through Cox regression, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The analysis considered medication use and its relation to HCC development. Cohort admission day was set as the date of the first oral hypoglycemic prescription.

RESULTS

The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that old age, male sex, chronic viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, liver cirrhosis, using a combination of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents for antidiabetic treatment, and calcium channel blocker (CCB) use were significantly correlated with higher HCC development risk, whereas dyslipidemia and statin, ezetimibe, and fibrate use was correlated with lower HCC risk, in the study cohort of 212,443 patients. Patients who used statins (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-0.80, P = 0.001) and fibrates (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.93, P = 0.031) showed a significantly lower risk of HCC development even after PSM. In contrast, CCB use was linked to an elevated HCC risk (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.05-1.72, P = 0.019), highlighting the differential impact of various medications on HCC incidence.

CONCLUSION

The use of specific medications, such as statins and fibrates, may offer protective effects against HCC in patients with FLD-T2D, whereas that of CCB may increase the risk. This underscores the importance of tailored medication strategies for the management of chronic conditions.

Association of metformin and statin uses with the prognosis of colon cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Metformin and statins are commonly used globally for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia, respectively. Recently, multiple novel pathways have been discovered, which may contribute to the treatment of various types of cancer. Several meta-analysis studies have reported that the use of metformin or statins is associated with a lower risk of colon cancer compared to nonusers. In this study, our aim was to perform a meta-analysis and investigate the prognostic roles of these two medications in colon cancer.

METHODS

To identify relevant articles, literature searches were performed in the PubMed and Web of Science databases using a combination of keywords related to metformin, statins and colon cancer prognosis until August 2023. The study utilized STATA 12.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) to compute all the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) regarding the association between metformin or statin uses and prognostic-related outcomes.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that the use of metformin was associated with a significantly lower overall mortality of colon cancer (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.51-0.77; I2  = 94.9%; P  < 0.001), as well as lower cancer-specific mortality of colon cancer (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.50-0.94; I2  = 91.9%; P  < 0.001). Similarly, the use of statins was also associated with a lower overall mortality of colon cancer (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.60-0.78; I2  = 93.8%; P  < 0.001), as well as a lower cancer-specific mortality of colon cancer (HR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.67-0.81; I2  = 82.2%; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis study suggests that statins and metformin may have potential as adjuvant agents with significant benefits in the prognosis of colon cancer.

A retrospective study on the effect of statins on mortality and antimicrobial resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection

Introduction

There is insufficient evidence in statin on the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) infection, we observe and analyze the clinical outcomes and antibiotic resistance of SA bloodstream infections in patients who received statins.

Methods

A retrospective study was carried out in SA bloodstream infection of hospitalized patients from January 2018 to August 2023. The 30-day attributable mortality, 30-day all-cause mortality and clinical data of patients who received statins and non-statins were compared.

Results

A total of 74 patients with SA bloodstream infection were included, 32 (43.2%) patients received treatment with statins and 42 (56.8%) with non-statins. The incidence of methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) was significantly lower in the statins group (15.6% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.034), however, no significant differences were observed in the mortality rate (p = 0.410).

Conclusions

This study revealed the superiority of statins in reducing incidence of MRSA among SA bloodstream infection patients, but statins do not improve the 30-day mortality rate.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Statin Intake and Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is a malignant tumor with a low survival rate. Statins, commonly prescribed for their lipid-lowering effects, have been suggested to possess potential chemopreventive properties against various cancers, including esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review studied the association between statin intake and esophageal cancer.

METHODS

To conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis, we reviewed studies published between 1980 and June 2023 in Web of Science (WOS), Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed using predefined protocols. We used various statistical tests conducted by Stata statistical software. Statistical significance was considered significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were collected and analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the odds ratio (OR) of esophageal cancer in patients treated with statins was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.57-0.75, p < 0.001) compared to the non-receiving group. The ORs for case-control and cohort studies were 0.67 (95% CI:0.54-0.83, p < 0.001) and 0.62 (95% CI:0.55-0.71, p < 0.001), respectively. The investigation into the relationship between the statins intake and the incidence of esophageal cancer did not reveal any indication of publication bias according to both Begg's test (p = 0.966) and Egger's test (p = 0.113).

CONCLUSION

The results revealed that the odds of esophageal cancer in patients treated with statins decreased by 35% compared to patients not treated with statins. However, further well-designed prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and understand the underlying mechanisms of statins in preventing esophageal cancer.

Effect of statin use on risk and mortality of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

The effect of statins on gastric cancer risk is still controversial. And studies on the association between statins and gastric cancer mortality are very limited. Therefore, we conducted this systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between the use of statin and gastric cancer. Searched studies were published before November 2022. Odds ratios (ORs)/relative risks (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using STATA 12.0 software. The study showed that the statin use group showed a significantly lower risk of gastric cancer, compared to no statin use group (OR/RR, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.67-0.80, P  < 0.001). The study showed that the statin use group showed significantly lower all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality of gastric cancer, compared to no statin use group (all-cause mortality: HR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.95, P  = 0.021; cancer-specific mortality: HR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.58-0.84, P  < 0.001). Overall, results from this meta-analysis showed the protective effect of statins exposure on the risk and prognosis of gastric cancer; however, we still need more well designed, large-scale studies and randomized clinical trials to pinpoint the effect of statins on gastric cancer in future clinical practice.

Menin Maintains Cholesterol Content in Colorectal Cancer via Repression of LXR-Mediated Transcription

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Menin is a nuclear scaffold protein that regulates gene transcription in an oftentimes tissue-specific manner. Our previous work showed that menin is over-expressed in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the full spectrum of menin function in colonic neoplasia remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to uncover novel menin-regulated pathways important for colorectal carcinogenesis.

METHODS

RNA-Seq analysis identified that menin regulates LXR-target gene expressions in CRC cell lines. Isolated colonic epithelium from Men1f/f;Vil1-Cre and Men1f/f mice was used to validate the results in vivo. Cholesterol content was quantified via an enzymatic assay.

RESULTS

RNA-Seq analysis in the HT-29 CRC cell line identified that menin inhibition upregulated LXR-target genes, specifically ABCG1 and ABCA1, with protein products that promote cellular cholesterol efflux. Similar results were noted across other CRC cell lines and with different methods of menin inhibition. Consistent with ABCG1 and ABCA1 upregulation, and similarly to LXR agonists, menin inhibition reduced the total cellular cholesterol in both HT-29 and HCT-15 cells. To confirm the effects of menin inhibition in vivo, we assessed Men1f/f;Vil1-Cre mice lacking menin expression in the colonic epithelium. Men1f/f;Vil1-Cre mice were found to have no distinct baseline phenotype compared to control Men1f/f mice. However, similarly to CRC cell lines, Men1f/f;Vil1-Cre mice showed an upregulation of Abcg1 and a reduction in total cellular cholesterol. Promoting cholesterol efflux, either via menin inhibition or LXR activation, was found to synergistically suppress CRC cell growth under cholesterol-depleted conditions and when administered concomitantly with small molecule EGFR inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Menin represses the transcription of LXR-target genes, including ABCA1 and ABCG1 in the colonic epithelium and CRC. Menin inhibition conversely upregulates LXR-target genes and reduces total cellular cholesterol, demonstrating that menin inhibition may be an important mechanism for targeting cholesterol-dependent pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Statin use and its association with decreased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in betel nut chewers

BACKGROUND

Betel nut chewing involves the chewing of areca nuts or betel quid (areca nuts wrapped in betel leaves), which is associated with an increased risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Statins have anticancer properties. We investigated the association between statin use and ESCC risk in betel nut chewers.

METHODS

The study included 105 387 betel nut chewers matched statin users and nonusers. Statin use was defined as the use of ≥28 cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs) of statin. The primary outcome was incidence of ESCC.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of ESCC was significantly lower in statin users than in nonusers (2.03 vs. 3.02 per 100 000 person-years). Statin users had a lower incidence rate ratio of 0.66 for ESCC (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.85) relative to nonusers. After potential confounders were adjusted for, statin use was determined to be associated with a reduced risk of ESCC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.68; 95% CI: 0.51-0.91). A dose-response relationship was observed between statin use and ESCC risk; the aHRs for statin use at 28-182 cDDDs, 183-488 cDDDs, 489-1043 cDDDs, and > 1043 cDDDs were 0.92, 0.89, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Statin use was revealed to be associated with a reduced risk of ESCC in betel nut chewers.

The association between statin use and prognosis in esophageal cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of statin use on the survival of esophageal cancer patients remains unclear now. The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between statin use and the long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched up to August 20, 2022, for relevant studies. The endpoints included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence-free survival, and hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled to assess the association between statin use and the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients. Subgroup analysis based on the pathological type (adenocarcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma), dose of statin use and tumor stage (tumor-node-metastasis I-III vs IV) was further performed. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 12.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 7 retrospective studies involving 25,711 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that statin use was significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.87, P < .001), CSS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.74-0.89, P < .001), and recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.87, P = .022). Furthermore, subgroup analysis stratified by the pathological type, dose of statin use and tumor stage for OS and CSS showed similar results and indicated the protective role of statin use in the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Statin use is significantly associated with improved long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients and might serve as a promising prognostic indicator in esophageal cancer. However, more prospective high-quality studies are still needed to verify our findings.

An empirical review on the resistance mechanisms of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer

Despite advances in cytotoxic treatments, colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of death. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have a poor prognosis despite improved treatments and more prolonged median survival. Monoclonal antibodies like cetuximab and panitumumab target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). They play an essential role in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) due to their efficacy in multiple phase III clinical trials across multiple treatment lines. It was discovered that anti-EGFR moAbs were only effective for a small number of patients. Mutations in KRAS and NRAS have been identified as biomarkers of drug resistance. New molecular predictors and prognostic markers are used clinically. The K-Ras mutation is the first molecular marker of a lack of response to EGFR-targeted therapy in K-Ras-mutant patients. Validating predictive and prognostic markers will improve cancer treatments. This article examines molecular markers that can predict colorectal cancer prognosis.

Exposure to Commonly Used Drugs and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses

Recently, attention has been paid to some medications and gastric cancer (GC) risk. This review aimed to evaluate associations between commonly used drugs and GC risk and to grade evidence from published systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This umbrella review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022320276). The systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies were retrieved by searching Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. The evidence strength of commonly used drugs and GC risk was categorized into four grades: weak, suggestive, highly suggestive, and strong. Of 19 associations between commonly used drugs and GC risk and its subtypes, none was supported by convincing or highly suggestive evidence. The risk of GC related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), non-aspirin NSAIDs, and acid-suppressive drugs, as well as the risk of non-cardia GC related to NSAIDs and aspirin, was supported by suggestive evidence. The results showed that a reduced GC risk was associated with two drug types (NSAIDs and non-aspirin NSAIDs), and an increased GC risk was associated with acid-suppressing drugs at the suggestive evidence level. Moreover, NSAIDs and aspirin reduced non-cardia GC risk as supported by suggestive evidence. However, the evidence supporting statins or metformin in reducing GC risk was weak, and thus future studies are required to clarify these associations.

Statins and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Previous epidemiological studies have reported that the use of statins is associated with a decreased risk of gastric cancer, although the beneficial effects of statins on the reduction of gastric cancer remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association between the use of statins and the risk of gastric cancer. Electronic databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched between 1 January 2000 and 31 August 2022. Two authors used predefined selection criteria to independently screen all titles, abstracts, and potential full texts. Observational studies (cohort and case-control) or randomized control trials that assessed the association between statins and gastric cancer were included in the primary and secondary analyses. The pooled effect sizes were calculated using the random-effects model. The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines were followed to conduct this study. The total sample size across the 20 included studies was 11,870,553. The use of statins was associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer (RRadjusted: 0.72; 95%CI: 0.64−0.81, p < 0.001). However, the effect size of statin use on the risk of gastric cancer was lower in Asian studies compared to Western studies (RRAsian: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.53−0.73 vs. RRwestern: 0.88; 95%CI: 0.79−0.99). These findings suggest that the use of statins is associated with a reduced risk of gastric cancer. This reverse association was even stronger among Asian people than Western individuals.

Mutant p53, the Mevalonate Pathway and the Tumor Microenvironment Regulate Tumor Response to Statin Therapy

Tumor cells have the ability to co-opt multiple metabolic pathways, enhance glucose uptake and utilize aerobic glycolysis to promote tumorigenesis, which are characteristics constituting an emerging hallmark of cancer. Mutated tumor suppressor and proto-oncogenes are frequently responsible for enhanced metabolic pathway signaling. The link between mutant p53 and the mevalonate (MVA) pathway has been implicated in the advancement of various malignancies, with tumor cells relying heavily on increased MVA signaling to fuel their rapid growth, metastatic spread and development of therapy resistance. Statin drugs inhibit HMG-CoA reductase, the pathway’s rate-limiting enzyme, and as such, have long been studied as a potential anti-cancer therapy. However, whether statins provide additional anti-cancer properties is worthy of debate. Here, we examine retrospective, prospective and pre-clinical studies involving the use of statins in various cancer types, as well as potential issues with statins’ lack of efficacy observed in clinical trials and future considerations for upcoming clinical trials.