Combining cytogenetic and genomic technologies for deciphering challenging complex chromosomal rearrangements

Analysis of complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosome 6 via the integration of optical genomic mapping and molecular cytogenetic methodologies

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) can result in spontaneous abortions, infertility, and malformations in newborns. In this study, we explored a familial CCR involving chromosome 6 by combining optical genomic mapping (OGM) and molecular cytogenetic methodologies. Within this family, the father and the paternal grandfather were both asymptomatic carriers of an identical balanced CCR, while the two offspring with an unbalanced paternal-origin CCR and two microdeletions presented with clinical manifestation. The first affected child, a 5-year-old boy, exhibited neurodevelopmental delay, while the second, a fetus, presented with hydrops fetalis. SNP-genotype analysis revealed a recombination event during gamete formation in the father that may have contributed to the deletion in his offspring. Meanwhile, the couple's haplotypes will facilitate the selection of normal gametes in the setting of assisted reproduction. Our study demonstrated the potential of OGM in identifying CCRs and its ability to work with current methodologies to refine precise breakpoints and construct accurate haplotypes for couples with a CCR.

Genomic Complexity and Complex Chromosomal Rearrangements in Genetic Diagnosis: Two Illustrative Cases on Chromosome 7

Complex chromosomal rearrangements are rare events compatible with survival, consisting of an imbalance and/or position effect of one or more genes, that contribute to a range of clinical presentations. The investigation and diagnosis of these cases are often difficult. The interpretation of the pattern of pairing and segregation of these chromosomes during meiosis is important for the assessment of the risk and the type of imbalance in the offspring. Here, we investigated two unrelated pediatric carriers of complex rearrangements of chromosome 7. The first case was a 2-year-old girl with a severe phenotype. Conventional cytogenetics evidenced a duplication of part of the short arm of chromosome 7. By array-CGH analysis, we found a complex rearrangement with three discontinuous trisomy regions (7p22.1p21.3, 7p21.3, and 7p21.3p15.3). The second case was a newborn investigated for hypodevelopment and dimorphisms. The karyotype analysis promptly revealed a structurally altered chromosome 7. The array-CGH analysis identified an even more complex rearrangement consisting of a trisomic region at 7q11.23q22 and a tetrasomic region of 4.5 Mb spanning 7q21.3 to q22.1. The mother's karyotype examination revealed a complex rearrangement of chromosome 7: the 7q11.23q22 region was inserted in the short arm at 7p15.3. Finally, array-CGH analysis showed a trisomic region that corresponds to the tetrasomic region of the son. Our work proved that the integration of several technical solutions is often required to appropriately analyze complex chromosomal rearrangements in order to understand their implications and offer appropriate genetic counseling.

Long-read genome sequencing identifies cryptic structural variants in congenital aniridia cases

BACKGROUND

Haploinsufficiency of the transcription factor PAX6 is the main cause of congenital aniridia, a genetic disorder characterized by iris and foveal hypoplasia. 11p13 microdeletions altering PAX6 or its downstream regulatory region (DRR) are present in about 25% of patients; however, only a few complex rearrangements have been described to date. Here, we performed nanopore-based whole-genome sequencing to assess the presence of cryptic structural variants (SVs) on the only two unsolved "PAX6-negative" cases from a cohort of 110 patients with congenital aniridia after unsuccessfully short-read sequencing approaches.

RESULTS

Long-read sequencing (LRS) unveiled balanced chromosomal rearrangements affecting the PAX6 locus at 11p13 in these two patients and allowed nucleotide-level breakpoint analysis. First, we identified a cryptic 4.9 Mb de novo inversion disrupting intron 7 of PAX6, further verified by targeted polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing and FISH-based cytogenetic analysis. Furthermore, LRS was decisive in correctly mapping a t(6;11) balanced translocation cytogenetically detected in a second proband with congenital aniridia and considered non-causal 15 years ago. LRS resolved that the breakpoint on chromosome 11 was indeed located at 11p13, disrupting the DNase I hypersensitive site 2 enhancer within the DRR of PAX6, 161 Kb from the causal gene. Patient-derived RNA expression analysis demonstrated PAX6 haploinsufficiency, thus supporting that the 11p13 breakpoint led to a positional effect by cleaving crucial enhancers for PAX6 transactivation. LRS analysis was also critical for mapping the exact breakpoint on chromosome 6 to the highly repetitive centromeric region at 6p11.1.

CONCLUSIONS

In both cases, the LRS-based identified SVs have been deemed the hidden pathogenic cause of congenital aniridia. Our study underscores the limitations of traditional short-read sequencing in uncovering pathogenic SVs affecting low-complexity regions of the genome and the value of LRS in providing insight into hidden sources of variation in rare genetic diseases.

Insight into the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome: Case report of a young women with infertility

Objective

To report the case of a young woman with repeated conception failure, whose karyotype showed an unbalanced complex chromosomal rearrangement involving a large duplication harboring >115 genes and overlapping the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome region. The 8p23.1 duplication syndrome results from a tandem duplication on the short arm of chromosome 8 containing the 4 genes (GATA4, TNKS, SOX7, XKR6) responsible for the most common phenotypic features: developmental delay/learning disabilities, congenital heart disease and dysmorphism.

Design

Case report and review of the literature.

Setting

American University of Beirut Medical Center, department of Pathology and Laboratory medicine.Patient(s): Young woman referred to the genetic clinics for the workup of secondary idiopathic infertility with multiple unsuccessful inseminations and in vitro fertilizations.

Interventions

Peripheral blood karyotype analysis from the patient and her parents. Elucidation of the CCR required whole chromosome painting Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization and Chromosomal Microarray.

Main outcome measures

The few published reports on 8p23.1 duplication syndrome (<50 cases) describing carriers reveal a wide range of phenotypic consequences with heterogeneous severity. The main outcome is to further understand this syndrome.

Results

Chromosomal microarray analysis detected a large (12Mb) pathogenic Copy Number Variant (CNV) at 8p23.3p23.1, overlapping the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome region. This CNV, classified as pathogenic, was shown to carry little significance in our patient.

Conclusions

8p23.1 duplication syndrome display a variable expressivity, ranging from overt syndromic features to minimal effect on the phenotype as shown in this case. Interpretation of prenatal detection of 8p23.1 duplication especially in preimplantation diagnosis is thus challenging. Nevertheless, this case emphasizes the importance of genetic testing in infertile patients displaying a normal phenotype.

Complex genomic rearrangements: an underestimated cause of rare diseases

Complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs) are known contributors to disease but are often missed during routine genetic screening. Identifying CGRs requires (i) identifying copy number variants (CNVs) concurrently with inversions, (ii) phasing multiple breakpoint junctions incis, as well as (iii) detecting and resolving structural variants (SVs) within repeats. We demonstrate how combining cytogenetics and new sequencing methodologies is being successfully applied to gain insights into the genomic architecture of CGRs. In addition, we review CGR patterns and molecular features revealed by studying constitutional genomic disorders. These data offer invaluable lessons to individuals interested in investigating CGRs, evaluating their clinical relevance and frequency, as well as assessing their impact(s) on rare genetic diseases.

Identification of a familial complex chromosomal rearrangement by optical genome mapping

BACKGROUND

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare chromosomal structural variations, containing a variety of rearrangements such as translocation, inversion and/or insertion. With the development of cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques, some chromosomal rearrangements that were initially considered to be simple reciprocal translocations in the past might eventually involve more complex chromosomal rearrangements.

CASE PRESENTATION

In this case, a pregnant woman, who had a spontaneous abortion last year, had abnormal prenatal test results again in the second pregnancy. Applying a combination of genetic methods including karyotype analysis, chromosomal microarray analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization and optical genome mapping confirmed that the pregnant woman was a carrier of a CCR involving three chromosomes and four breakpoints, and the CCR was paternal-origin. Her first and second pregnancy abnormalities were caused by chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications due to the malsegregations of the derivative chromosomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented a rare familial CCR involving three chromosomes and four breakpoints. This study provided precise and detailed information for the subsequent reproductive decision-making and genetic counselling of the patient.

Mechanisms of structural chromosomal rearrangement formation

Structural chromosomal rearrangements result from different mechanisms of formation, usually related to certain genomic architectural features that may lead to genetic instability. Most of these rearrangements arise from recombination, repair, or replication mechanisms that occur after a double-strand break or the stalling/breakage of a replication fork. Here, we review the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements, highlighting their main features and differences. The most important mechanisms of constitutional chromosomal alterations are discussed, including Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR), Non-Homologous End-Joining (NHEJ), Fork Stalling and Template Switching (FoSTeS), and Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication (MMBIR). Their involvement in chromoanagenesis and in the formation of complex chromosomal rearrangements, inverted duplications associated with terminal deletions, and ring chromosomes is also outlined. We reinforce the importance of high-resolution analysis to determine the DNA sequence at, and near, their breakpoints in order to infer the mechanisms of formation of structural rearrangements and to reveal how cells respond to DNA damage and repair broken ends.