Endoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: difference between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in terms of the operative course

Which surgical approach is more favorable for pheochromocytoma of different sizes (< 6 cm vs. ≥ 6 cm)? A single retrospective center experience

BACKGROUND

To compare the surgical effects of lateral transperitoneal approach (LTA) and posterior retroperitoneal approach (PRA) for pheochromocytoma of different sizes.

METHODS

Data on patients with pheochromocytoma from 2014 to 2023 were collected from our hospital. According to different surgical approaches and tumor size, all patients were divided into four groups: tumor size < 6 cm for LTA and PRA and tumor size ≥ 6 cm for LTA and PRA. We compared these two surgical methods for pheochromocytoma of different sizes.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients with pheochromocytoma underwent successful laparoscopic surgery, including PRA group (n = 80) and LTA group (n = 38). In tumor size < 6 cm, the outcomes were no significant difference in LTA and PRA. In tumor size ≥ 6 cm, there was a significant difference in operation time (214.7 ± 18.9 vs. 154.3 ± 8.2, P = 0.007) and intraoperative blood loss (616.4 ± 181.3 vs. 201.4 ± 45.8, P = 0.037) between LTA and PRA.

CONCLUSION

LTA and PRA were performed safely with similar operative outcomes in patients with pheochromocytoma size < 6 cm. While both LTA and PRA were executed with a commendable safety profile and comparable operative results in patients afflicted by pheochromocytomas < 6 cm, the PRA technique distinctly showcased advantages when addressing large-scale pheochromocytomas (≥ 6 cm). Notably, this manifested in reduced operative time, diminished intraoperative blood loss, decreased hospitalization expenses, and a paucity of procedural complications.

Perception versus reality: A case-matched study assessing the intraoperative hemodynamics of minimally invasive retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach to pheochromocytomas

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytomas produce excess catecholamines that can result in intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Centers have reported variations in intraoperative hemodynamics with the retroperitoneoscopic versus the laparoscopic transperitoneal approach to adrenalectomies. When the retroperitoneoscopic approach was initiated for pheochromocytomas at our institution, the perception was of improved intraoperative hemodynamics, hypothesizing that increased retroperitoneoscopic insufflation pressures caused decreased venous return and less fluctuation in circulating catecholamines. The purpose of this study was to examine if a difference in intraoperative hemodynamics exists between a size-matched cohort of laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic pheochromocytoma patients.

METHODS

Unilateral adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma performed via laparoscopic transperitoneal or retroperitoneoscopic approaches from 2015 to 2021 were identified from a surgical database. As larger tumors often underwent a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach, cases were matched 1:1 by tumor size. All patients received phenoxybenzamine. Groups were compared by patient characteristics, preoperative blockade, intraoperative hemodynamics and management, and early postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 13 laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy cases matched to 13 retroperitoneoscopic cases according to tumor size. Both groups (laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic) were similar for age (53 years), body mass index (28.5 vs 29.7), sex (69% female), and side (8 vs 7 right). There was no difference in preoperative 24-hour urine metanephrines/normetanephrines (9.9/8.0 vs 2.4/5.7 μmol/day). The phenoxybenzamine dose was similar in both groups (112 vs 114 mg/24 hours), as were baseline heart rate, blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure. There was no difference in any intraoperative hemodynamic parameters or vasoactive interventions. Operative time, length of stay, and 30-day emergency visits were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

This matched cohort study did not find a difference in intraoperative hemodynamics between laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy approaches for pheochromocytoma in appropriately selected and blocked patients.

Comparison of lateral transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma: a single-centre retrospective study

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has became the standardized treatment for pheochromocytoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of lateral transperitoneal and retroperitoneal LA for pheochromocytoma. Between January 2011 and December 2021, 142 patients with pheochromocytoma underwent LA via lateral transperitoneal (123 patients) or retroperitoneal (19 patients) approaches. Data of these patients were assessed to investigate the differences in perioperative outcomes and intraoperative haemodynamic parameters between the two procedures. Clinical parameters at presentation were comparable between the two groups, except for tumour size, which was larger in the transperitoneal group (50 [10-115] mm vs 35 [7-110] mm, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative transfusion rate, incidence of complications, conversion to open surgery, postoperative analgesic requirement, time to first oral intake, or mean hospital stay. Intraoperative haemodynamic parameters of the two groups were similar. After adjusting for tumour size using propensity score matching, both perioperative outcomes and haemodynamic parameters were still comparable. Lateral transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomies provide similar perioperative and haemodynamic outcomes for surgical resection of pheochromocytoma.

Hypotension in Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Versus Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

INTRODUCTION

Despite preoperative optimization, hemodynamic instability can be a major challenge during adrenalectomy. Even brief episodes of intraoperative hypotension can be associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury. This study aimed to compare intraoperative hemodynamic parameters between posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) and transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (TPA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing PRA and TPA without conversion or concomitant intraabdominal pathology from 2008 to 2019. The primary outcome was intraoperative hypotension defined by mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg or the need for ≥1 intravenous vasopressors at least 30 min after anesthetic induction.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 patients met the inclusion criteria; 33 (30.6%) had pheochromocytoma, 26 (24.1%) had aldosterone excess, 8 (7.4%) had corticosteroid excess, and 41 (38.0%) had nonfunctioning adrenal tumors. Of these, 68 (63.0%) underwent PRA and 40 (37.0%) underwent TPA. Age, sex, body mass index, preinduction blood pressure, number of preoperative antihypertensives, and histopathological diagnosis were similar in the two groups. Tumor size was greater in the TPA group. The presence of pheochromocytoma was an independent risk factor for hypotension. Multivariate analysis revealed that PRA was associated with a higher risk of experiencing a mean arterial pressure <60 mm Hg (odds ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval 1.27-15.54, P = 0.02) and the need for ≥1 intravenous vasopressors (odds ratio 9.97, 95% confidence interval 3.34-29.78, P < 0.001) compared with TPA.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PRA offers several advantages over TPA, it carries a greater risk of intraoperative hypotension. A prospective trial is required to validate these findings. Nevertheless, institution of risk reduction strategies is encouraged to be considered for individuals undergoing PRA.

Comparison of lateral transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for homolateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Background

There is a lack of data regarding the appropriateness of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for homolateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy. The aim of this study is to compare lateral transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach for left-sided and right-sided laparoscopic adrenalectomy respectively.

Methods

Between January 2014 and December 2019, 242 patients underwent left-sided and 252 patients underwent right-sided laparoscopic adrenalectomy. For left side, transperitoneal approach was used in 132 (103 with tumors < 5 cm and 29 with tumors ≥ 5 cm) and retroperitoneal approach in 110 (102 with tumors < 5 cm and 8 with tumors ≥ 5 cm). For right side, transperitoneal approach was used in 139 (121 with tumors < 5 cm and 18 with tumors ≥ 5 cm) and retroperitoneal approach in 113 (102 with tumors < 5 cm and 11 with tumors ≥ 5 cm). Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were recorded. For each side, both approaches were compared for tumors < 5 cm and ≥ 5 cm respectively.

Results

For left-sided tumors < 5 cm, transperitoneal approach demonstrated shorter operative time, less blood loss and longer time to oral intake. For left-sided tumors ≥ 5 cm, the peri-operative data of both approaches was comparable. For right-sided tumors < 5 cm, transperitoneal approach demonstrated shorter operative time and less blood loss. For right-sided tumors ≥ 5 cm, the peri-operative data was comparable.

Conclusions

Lateral transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach are both effective for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Lateral transperitoneal approach is faster with less blood loss for tumors < 5 cm.

Lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: advantages and drawbacks

Lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (LRA) is performed mostly by urologists. It is gaining popularity among general surgeons because of the direct access to the adrenal gland. However, the management of large tumors remains controversial. We report our experience and discuss the advantages and the drawbacks of this approach. Between December 2011 and April 2015, 89 consecutive patients underwent LRA for adrenal tumors. Conversion to open surgery, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, intra-operative complications, early and late postoperative complications, and mortality were analyzed. The entire group was divided into patients with large tumors (> 5 cm) and patients with small tumors (≤ 5 cm), which were further compared. The conversion rate was 1.1%. The mean operative time was 107.4 ± 27.95 min, the mean blood loss 33.15 ± 25.45 ml. The mean hospital stay was 4.7 ± 2.05 days. Most of the complications were minor. There was zero mortality. Concerning the size of the tumor, we found statistically significant difference in operative time (p = 0.001), hospital stay (p = 0.020), incidence of early postoperative complications (p = 0.049), and conversion rate to open surgery (p = 0.037). LRA is a feasible, effective and safe procedure that offers additional advantages over the standard transabdominal approach because of its direct access to the adrenal gland. However, malignancy, large tumor size, bilateral pathology, and concomitant intra-abdominal pathology may represent a potential setback for this approach.

Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours in adults

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is an accepted treatment worldwide for adrenal gland disease in adults. The transperitoneal approach is more common. The retroperitoneal approach may be preferred, to avoid entering the peritoneum, but no clear advantage has been demonstrated so far.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy (LTPA) versus laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (LRPA) for adrenal tumours in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ICTRP Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov to 3 April 2018. We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently scanned the abstract, title, or both sections of every record retrieved to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on laparoscopic adrenalectomy for preoperatively assessed adrenal tumours. Participants were affected by corticoid and medullary, benign and malignant, functional and silent tumours or masses of the adrenal gland, which were assessed by both laboratory and imaging studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed trials for risk of bias, and evaluated overall study quality using GRADE criteria. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, or the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables, and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We primarily used a random-effects model for pooling data.

MAIN RESULTS

We examined 1069 publications, scrutinized 42 full-text publications or records, and included five RCTs. Altogether, 244 participants entered the five trials; 127 participants were randomised to retroperitoneal adrenalectomy and 117 participants to transperitoneal adrenalectomy. Two trials had a follow-up of nine months, and three trials a follow-up of 31 to 70 months. Most participants were women, and the average age was around 40 years. Three trials reported all-cause mortality; in two trials, there were no deaths, and in one trial with six years of follow-up, four participants died in the LRPA group and one participant in the LTPA group (164 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report all-cause morbidity. Therefore, we analysed early and late morbidity, and included specific adverse events under these outcome measures. The results were inconclusive between LRPA and LTPA for early morbidity (usually reported within 30 to 60 days after surgery; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.16; P = 0.12; 5 trials, 244 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Nine out of 127 participants (7.1%) in the LRPA group, compared with 16 out of 117 participants (13.7%) in the LTPA group experienced an adverse event. Participants in the LRPA group may have a lower risk of developing late morbidity (reported as latest available follow-up; RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.92; P = 0.04; 3 trials, 146 participants; very low-quality evidence). None of the 78 participants in the LRPA group, compared with 7 of the 68 participants (10.3%) in the LTPA group experienced an adverse event.None of the trials reported health-related quality of life. The results were inconclusive for socioeconomic effects, assessed as time to return to normal activities and length of hospital stay, between the intervention and comparator groups (very low-certainty evidence). Participants who had LRPA may have had an earlier start on oral fluid or food intake (MD -8.6 hr, 95% CI -13.5 to -3.7; P = 0.0006; 2 trials, 89 participants), and ambulation (MD -5.4 hr, 95% CI -6.8 to -4.0 hr; P < 0.0001; 2 trials, 89 participants) than those in the LTPA groups. Postoperative and operative parameters (duration of surgery, operative blood loss, conversion to open surgery) showed inconclusive results between the intervention and comparator groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The body of evidence on laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy compared with laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy is limited. Late morbidity might be reduced following laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy, but we are uncertain about this effect because of very low-quality evidence. The effects on other key outcomes, such as all-cause mortality, early morbidity, socioeconomic effects, and operative and postoperative parameters are uncertain. LRPA might show a shorter time to oral fluid or food intake and time to ambulation, but we are uncertain whether this finding can be replicated. New long-term RCTs investigating additional data, such as health-related quality of life, surgeons' level of experience, treatment volume of surgical centres, and details on techniques used are needed.

Comparative outcomes of lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy versus posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in consecutive patients: A single surgeon's experience

BACKGROUND

Among several minimally invasive adrenalectomy techniques, lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy (LTA) is the procedure of choice for benign adrenal tumors; however, posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA) is an alternative that is increasing in popularity. This study compared the outcomes of these two approaches.

METHODS

Since a single surgeon started adrenalectomy, LTA had been performed exclusively until PRA was adopted and became the standard treatment. Therefore, the consecutive patients were allocated into two groups according to the date of surgery: the first group received LTA and the second group received PRA.

RESULTS

LTA was performed in 29 patients and PRA in 19 patients. There was no difference in sex, age, body mass index, clinical diagnosis, and tumor size between the LTA and the PRA group. The PRA group showed less blood loss (117.0 mL vs. 58.5 mL, p = 0.035) and tended to have a shorter operating time (92.2 minutes vs. 78.1 minutes, p = 0.054) and less pain score on postoperative Day 1 (3.8 vs. 3.0, p = 0.095) and Day 2 (3.2 vs. 2.5, p = 0.051). The mean operation time was significantly shorter for patients in the PRA group undergoing right adrenalectomy (109.2 minutes vs. 80.5 minutes, p = 0.009), but those undergoing left adrenalectomy had a similar operating time to the LTA group (83.2 minutes vs. 74.8 minutes, p = 0.380).

CONCLUSION

PRA is a good alternative operative technique for an endocrine surgeon who is experienced in the transperitoneal approach.

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy in sporadic and MENIIA pheochromocytomas

INTRODUCTION

Retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (PRA) comprises an alternative approach in the management of adrenal tumors that has been set as the treatment of choice in our Institution. We assess the impact of PRA the management of hereditary and sporadic pheochromocytomas comparing its outcomes to the laparoscopic technique, in a case-controlled setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 2008 to January 2013, 17 patients [5 males and 12 females, mean age: 51 yrs (range 26-73)] with pheochromocytomas underwent PRA. Demographics, tumor characteristics, operative time, complications, hospital stay, and postoperative pain (based on VAS score at days 1 and 3) were compared to 17 selected laparoscopic patient controls [7 males and 10 females, mean age 49 yrs (range 25-64)].

RESULTS

17 patients, 11 with the sporadic form and 6 with MENIIA associated pheochromocytomas, comprised the retroperitoneoscopic group. 19 pheochromocytomas with a mean size 3.7 cm (range 1.7-7.0) at a mean operative time: 105.6 min (range 60-180) were accordingly excised. In the laparoscopic group, 13 patients had sporadic pheochromocytomas, whereas 4 patients had MENIIA syndrome. Mean tumor size of the laparoscopic series was 5.1 cm (range 1.7-8.5) at a mean operative time of 137 min (range 75-195). No mortality or conversions were encountered in both groups. No blood transfusions were needed. Mean visual analog scale pain scores were significantly lower for the retroperitoneoscopic group both on days 1 and 3 [0.94 (0-3) vs 4.15 (3-6), p < 0.001 and 0.06 (0-1) vs 3.5 (2-6) p < 0.001] respectively. Mean hospital stay for the patients of the retroperitoneoscopic group was significantly better than the laparoscopic group [(2.1 ± 0.24 days vs 40 ± 0.70 days) p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy is associated with excellent clinical results in the management of sporadic and hereditary pheochromocytomas. Moreover, it appears to be superior to the laparoscopic approach, because it is faster and affords the patient with less pain and shorter hospital stay.

Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in adrenal tumor: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The study aims to provide a pooled meta-analysis of existing studies that compare the outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with transperitoneal approach for adrenal tumor.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases was performed and studies were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data of interest were subjected to meta-analysis using randomized or fixed-effect model to calculate weight mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR). The sensitivity analysis and publication bias test also be conducted.

RESULTS

Nine observational studies with 632 patients were identified (339 retroperitoneal vs. 293 transperitoneal). Retroperitoneal approach was associated with shorter operative time [WMD=-13.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), -23.83 to -2.36; P=0.02], less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-40.60; 95% CI, -79.73 to -1.47; P=0.04), shorter duration of hospital stay (WMD=-1.25; 95% CI, -2.36 to -0.14; P=0.03), or time to first ambulation (WMD=-0.38; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.28; P<0.001). Although the difference between number of convert to open management, time to first oral intake, and major postoperative complication rate was not significant (OR=0.53; 95% CI, 0.17 to 1.60; P=0.26; WMD=-0.31; 95% CI, -1.14 to 0.52; P=0.47; OR=0.41; 95% CI, 0.06 to 1.06; P=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The present evidence demonstrates that retroperitoneal adrenalectomy is better than transperitoneal approach for patients with adrenal tumor in short-term outcomes. However, extended follow-ups and further randomized controlled trials should be required to analysis.

Meta-analysis of trials comparing laparoscopic transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomies are being performed increasingly, either with transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approaches. Studies comparing the 2 approaches have not shown the superiority of either technique, but these studies are limited by small sample sizes and single-institution designs. To overcome these limitations, we performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies comparing lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy was conducted. Study endpoints included perioperative outcomes and measures of postoperative recovery. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, pooling variables evaluated by more than 3 studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies comparing a total of 1,205 lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomies and 688 retroperitoneal adrenalectomies were suitable for meta-analysis. Patients in the 2 groups were similar in term of age, sex, body mass index, lesion size and location, and rates of malignancy. There were no statistically significant differences between lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy in terms of operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, time to oral intake, overall and major morbidity, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Both lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomy and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy are associated with very low rates of perioperative complications. According to our meta-analysis, clinical outcomes after either technique are similar. For most adrenal lesions requiring operation, minimally invasive adrenalectomy can be performed safely and effectively with either transperitoneal or the retroperitoneal approach. Additional studies may be needed to analyze if any difference in long-term results exist.

Laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy

Almost more than a decade ago laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy was introduced as an alternative to lateral approach. Today both of the techniques have become standard in removal of adrenal tumors and many surgeons showed favorable results in malignant tumors. This review outlines the technical details of the procedure and provides a summary of the literature.

Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: A Multicenter Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approaches

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) is both feasible and safe with either transperitoneal or retroperitoneal entry. However, only a few studies have rigorously compared these two techniques. The aim of the current study is to compare transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy to detect significant differences in patient selection and perioperative outcomes. Between 1995 and 2009, 171 patients underwent MIA through transperitoneal (n = 127) or retroperitoneal access (n = 44). The respective cohorts were then examined retrospectively through matched and unmatched comparisons. Multivariate analyses of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay were performed. Surgical indications were benign lesions (70.2%), malignant tumors (11.1%), and pheochromocytomas (18.7%). The postoperative morbidity rate was 15.8 per cent, but mortality was null. The rate of conversion to open surgery was 5.3 per cent. Blood loss and operative time were significantly lower with the transperitoneal approach, whereas time to oral intake was shorter for the retroperitoneal group. Tumor size less than 4.5 cm was associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and lower postoperative morbidity. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneal routes are both effective and safe for excising adrenal lesions. In the present study, however, laparoscopic adrenalectomy demonstrated shorter operative times with less blood loss. Regardless of this, we remain cautious in recommending one procedure preferentially. Other important measures of clinical outcome such as required pain control, ease of patient recovery, and cost considerations were not included in this analysis. Further randomized trials, with large patient numbers, are therefore desirable for defining an optimal surgical method.

Hybrid laparo-endoscopic single port transperitoneal right adrenalectomy

Laparoscopic surgery is a preferable technique for adrenalectomy. Laparo-endoscopic single port surgery (LESS) is one of the newest areas in minimally invasive surgery. The development of the technology has made many surgical procedures less invasive. In this paper, we report hybrid laparo-endoscopic single port transperitoneal right adrenalectomy for a non-functional adrenal mass.

Outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Clinical experience with 68 patients

The aim of this study was to analyze feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). Pathology, size and bilateral site of lesions were considered. Between December 1998 and May 2007 in our institution a total of 68 patients of mean age of 53 years underwent unilateral (n=57) or bilateral (n=11) LA. Adrenal masses averaged 5.4cm in size (range 1.2-13cm) and 56.7g in weight (range 10-265) including 71 benign and 8 malignant lesions. A total of 79 adrenal glands were resected, 44 right sided and 35 left sided. Removal was complete in 77 cases and partial (sparing adrenalectomy) in 1 patient affected by bilateral pheochomocytoma. Three left adrenalectomies for pheochromocytoma were robot-assisted. The transperitoneal lateral approach was preferred and the posterior retroperitoneal approach was adopted in 5 patients. The mean duration of surgery for each LA was 138+/-90min and 3.8 trocar were used on average (range 3-6). Conversion was needed in 3 cases owing to difficult dissection of large masses. Estimated mean blood loss for each LA was 95+/-30ml and it was greater for bilateral LA. Mortality was nil and morbidity was 5.8%. The average length of hospital stay (LOS) in surgical unit was 4+/-2.4 days (range 2-8). Patients affected by hormone secreting or bilateral lesions, by unilateral or bilateral pheochromocytoma and by bilateral Cushing's disease were transferred to the endocrinological ward so that their overall hospital stay was prolonged to 9+/-2.8 days on average (range 7-17). Mean duration of follow-up of patients was 38 months (range 2-100) and demonstrated acceptable endocrine results. Three primary cortical carcinomas were discovered as chance findings on histologic examination. While long-term results after LA for cortical carcinomas were poor and LA is not recommended in such cases, long-term results after LA for adrenal metastases were encouraging.

[Minimally invasive adrenal gland surgery]

Nowadays, minimally invasive operating techniques are an essential part of adrenal gland surgery. Meanwhile four different methods are being used: laparoscopically in the supine or lateral position or retroperitoneoscopically as a prone or lateral method. Ideal indications for endoscopic adrenalectomy are adrenal hyperplasias and benign, hormonally active adrenal gland tumors up to 5 cm in diameter. In comparison to the conventional operating procedures, the endoscopic methods have the advantage of less blood loss and minimized postoperative pain as well as shortening of hospital stay. Yet in contrast, the operating time of these procedures is prolonged. To date, it is not evident whether laparoscopy or retroperitoneoscopy should be preferred. Laparoscopy offers a familiar anatomical exposure but requires 5-6 trocars. For the retroperitoneoscopic methods only 3 trocars are needed, but orientation in the operating field is more difficult. All endoscopic procedures on the adrenal gland are technically difficult. They require a extended experience in minimally invasive surgery as well as special knowledge in endocrine surgery.