Needle-knife assisted ERCP

The success rate of cannulation of needle-knife precut is superior to continuing wire-guided after difficult biliary cannulation with pancreatic stent placement

BACKGROUND

Difficult biliary cannulation and unintended pancreatic cannulation exist in biliary interventions during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Wire-guided cannulation over a pancreatic stent (PS-WGC) and needle-knife precut over a pancreatic stent (PS-NKP) may facilitate biliary cannulation. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of PS-NKP and PS-WGC following guidewire passage into the pancreatic duct.

METHODS

A total of 304 patients who inserted a pancreatic stent and continued cannulation using wire-guided (PS-WGC) or needle-knife precut (PS-NKP) from October 2018 to November 2021 in three centers were ultimately enrolled in this study. The success rate of cannulation and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Results of the success rate of cannulation in the PS-NKP (n = 98) group were significantly higher compared with the PS-WGC (n = 206) group (96.9% vs. 89.8%; P < 0.05). The overall adverse events were 10.2% (31/304), and PS-NKP had lower (PEP) rates compared with the PS-WGC (3.1% vs. 10.7%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The PS-NKP group is superior to the PS-WGC group in terms of the effectiveness and safety of continued cannulation. Using needle-knife precut, especially early use, over the pancreatic stent to continue cannulation reduced PEP compared with PS-WGC.

Multidimensional assessment of spirituality/religion in patients with HIV: conceptual framework and empirical refinement

A decade ago, an expert panel developed a framework for measuring spirituality/religion in health research (Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality), but empirical testing of this framework has been limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether responses to items across multiple measures assessing spirituality/religion by 450 patients with HIV replicate this model. We hypothesized a six-factor model underlying a collective of 56 items, but results of confirmatory factor analyses suggested eight dimensions: Meaning/Peace, Tangible Connection to the Divine, Positive Religious Coping, Love/Appreciation, Negative Religious Coping, Positive Congregational Support, Negative Congregational Support, and Cultural Practices. This study corroborates parts of the factor structure underlying the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality and some recent refinements of the original framework.

Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-associated pancreatitis? A randomized, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis is the most common major complication of ERCP and precut endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Prophylactic pancreatic duct (PD) stent placement has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in high-risk settings.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether leaving a main PD stent in place after precut ES would reduce the incidence and severity of PEP.

DESIGN

Single-center, randomized, prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care ERCP referral center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients who underwent ERCP with a clear indication for biliary access and standard biliary ES whereby free cannulation of the bile duct was not possible and precut ES was undertaken.

INTERVENTIONS

When free bile duct cannulation for ES was not possible and selective PD cannulation was achieved, a PD stent was placed. Using the PD stent as a guide, we used a needle-knife sphincterotome to perform precut ES. The patients were then randomized to either leaving the PD stent in place for 7 to 10 days (stent group) or immediate removal after the procedure (stent removed group). The remaining patients who did not undergo selective PD cannulation and stent placement were not randomized (no stent group) and had a free-hand needle-knife ES performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Patients were prospectively followed for the development of complications. Standardized criteria were used to diagnose and grade the severity of PEP.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were enrolled. The groups were similar with regard to patient demographics and patient and procedure risk factors for PEP. The overall incidence of PEP was 13.2% (20/151). It occurred in 4.3% (2/46), 21.3% (10/47), and 13.8% (8/58) of patients in the stent, stent removed, and no stent groups, respectively. The stent group had a significantly lower frequency and severity of PEP compared with the stent removed group (4.3% vs 21.3%; P = .027 for frequency and 0% vs 12.8%; P = .026 for moderate and severe pancreatitis).

LIMITATIONS

Single center. Randomization scheme not optimal.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that placing and maintaining a PD stent for needle-knife precut ES reduces the frequency and severity of postprocedure pancreatitis.

Angled- or straight-tipped hydrophilic guidewire in biliary cannulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Deep biliary cannulation is the key for successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Guidewire-assisted cannulation is associated both with a higher success rate and a reduced risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with standard catheter cannulation. However, to our knowledge there are no prospective, randomized studies comparing the use of different guidewires in biliary cannulation. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of an angled-tipped guidewire (AGW) with a straight-tipped guidewire (SGW) in achieving successful deep biliary cannulation.

METHODS

Patients with intended biliary cannulation of an intact papilla were prospectively randomized to angled- or straight-tipped hydrophilic guidewire arms in a tertiary, referral, university hospital setting. Randomized cannulation method was applied either until successful cannulation of the bile duct or until 2 min had passed. Crossover was not included in the study protocol. The main outcome measurements were the cannulation success rate and duration of cannulation.

RESULTS

Of the 239 consecutive patients, 155 patients were randomized: in the final analysis 70 patients were included in the AGW arm and 83 patients in the SGW arm. Cannulation time [median; seconds (s)] was shorter with the AGW compared with the SGW (20 vs. 63 s, p = 0.01). There was no difference in the cannulation success rate or the complication rate between the two study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

AGW may facilitate biliary cannulation in ERCP.

Needle-knife fistulotomy in patients with periampullary diverticula and difficult bile duct cannulation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Needle-knife fistulotomy has commonly been used for overcoming difficult bile duct cannulation. Periampullary diverticula (PAD) can be an impediment to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. There are little data on needle-knife fistulotomy in patients with PAD. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of needle-knife fistulotomy between patients with and without PAD.

METHODS

  Data from December 2005 to October 2010 were reviewed. Patients who underwent needle-knife fistulotomy were divided into the group with PAD and the group without PAD (control group). The technical success and complications were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 3012 ERCP cases were analyzed. Needle-knife fistulotomy was performed in 154 out of 3012 cases (5.1%) with 138 of these patients (89.6%) experiencing successful bile duct cannulation. The overall cannulation success rate was not significantly different between PAD group (n=33) and control group (n =121) (93.9% vs 88.4%; P=0.523). There was no significant difference in pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

  Needle-knife fistulotomy can be performed effectively and safely in patients with periampullary diverticula and difficult bile duct cannulation.

ERCP procedures in a Finnish community hospital: a retrospective analysis of 1207 cases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure with a risk of serious and life-threatening complications. The most common complications are pancreatitis, haemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis. The aim of this study was to determine indications, success rates and complications in a low-volume ERCP unit in Kanta-Häme Central Hospital (KHCH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data on 1207 consecutive ERCPs performed in KHCH between 2002 and 2009 was collected retrospectively from patient histories. Complications were classified according to need for intervention and length of hospitalisation.

RESULTS

Cannulation of the desired duct was successful in 89.2% of 825 ERCPs with no earlier sphincterotomy. Complete stone removal was achieved in 91.3% of procedures. Standard biliary sphincterotomy was performed in 73.8% and precut sphincterotomy in 12.0 % of cases. Cholangitis developed in 2.1%, bleeding in 1.9%, pancreatitis in 1.9%, perforation in 1.0% and cardio-pulmonary or miscellaneous complications in 4.2% of cases. The majority of complications could be managed conservatively. In procedures with no earlier sphincterotomy ERCP-related 30-day mortality was 0.2% (n=2) and overall 30-day mortality was 3.3% (n=27).

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP indications and success rates, as well as morbidity and mortality were comparable to those re-ported earlier. Although the success rate of cannulation and thereby ERCP procedures seem to be somewhat lower than in tertiary referral centres, ERCP procedures can be safely performed in a low-volume ERCP unit by concentrating procedures on a few experienced endoscopists. The success rates may be further improved with the latest cannulation techniques, used selectively in the last years of the study period.

Feasibility of the novel 3-step protocol for biliary cannulation--a prospective analysis

Traditionally, a 2-step protocol has been used for deep biliary cannulation. The purpose of the present prospective study was to find out the feasibility and safety of the novel sequential 3-step protocol (traditional cannula with guidewire, double-guidewire, and needle-knife techniques) for deep biliary cannulation. All consecutive patients admitted for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to a single, very experienced ERCP endoscopist during the year 2009 with intended biliary cannulation and with unhindered access to a native papilla (n=105) were included in the present study. The overall success rate for deep biliary cannulation was 99% (104/105). Cannulation with cannula and guidewire was attempted in all patients and proved successful in 80% (84/105) of the attempts, the double-guidewire technique was applied in 19% (20/105) and was successful in 65% (13/20) of the cases, and the needle-knife technique was applied in 7% (7/105) with success in all cases. The median cannulation time was 1 minute (range, 0 to 27 min). The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 3% (3/105) and post-ERCP cholangitis 2% (2/105). We conclude that in experienced hands, the novel sequential 3-step protocol for biliary cannulation tested herein proved to be an effective cannulation protocol with the overall success rate of 99%. The complication rate of these ERCP procedures (5%) was within acceptable limits.

Outcome of repeat ERCP after initial failed use of a needle knife for biliary access

INTRODUCTION

A needle knife is often used to gain bile duct access when standard techniques have failed. If unsuccessful, the next step may involve either radiological- or endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access. However, repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be an option if the patient's clinical condition permits.

AIM

To determine the success of repeat ERCP after failed use of a needle knife to gain biliary access.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation after use of a needle knife between 2007 and 2010.

RESULTS

Seventy five patients were identified. Of these, 51 (68%) underwent repeat ERCP, and biliary cannulation was successful in 38 (75%). The median time to repeat ERCP was 7.7 days (range 1-28 days). Complications developed in two (4%) patients. These included one case each of wire-guided perforation and mild pancreatitis, both of which were resolved by conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat ERCP within a few days after failed use of a needle knife for biliary access is associated with acceptable success and acceptable incidence of complications, and therefore obviates the need for alternative approaches for biliary access for most patients.

Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Precut sphincterotomy (PS) is usually indicated in failed standard biliary cannulation (BC). PS requires experienced endoscopists, and contains significant risk. Double-guidewire (DG) cannulation seems to be easier, and might be useful after failed standard BC. We aimed to compare cannulation time, success rate, and complication rates between the two techniques.

METHODS

Patients who failed standard BC within 10 min by the expert were defined as truly difficult BC and randomized into both groups. In the DG group, the first guidewire was left in the pancreatic duct, and then a catheter, pre-inserted with another guidewire, was used for the BC. In the PS group, a fistulotomy technique was used.

RESULTS

From June 2008 to October 2009, 534 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Forty-four patients (8.2%) who failed standard BC were randomized into the DG group (n = 23) and the PS group (n = 21). Median cannulation times and success rates in the DG and PS groups were 172 versus 394 s (P < 0.001), and 73.9% versus 80.9% (P = 0.724), respectively. The pancreatitis rate and serum amylase at 24 h in the DG and PS groups were 21.7% versus 14.3% (P = 0.701) and 937 versus 195 mg/dL (P = 0.020), respectively. Two from each group developed mild bleeding. No perforation occurred.

CONCLUSION

In truly difficult BC, the DG technique requires a significant shorter duration for BC, with a comparable success rate to the PS technique. The post-procedure serum amylase level in the DG group was significantly higher, and there was a trend of more pancreatitis.

Female gender and post-ERCP pancreatitis: is the association caused by difficult cannulation?

OBJECTIVE

Female gender is a well-known risk factor for the development of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis, but the underlying mechanism for this increased risk has remained unknown. We hypothesize that cannulation difficulty might play a part in this association. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the female papilla is more difficult to cannulate than the male papilla.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective data collection with emphasis on cannulation was conducted in 364 consecutive biliary ERCP procedures performed by very experienced ERCP endoscopists through native papilla in a tertiary referral university hospital.

RESULTS

Although the cannulation times seemed to be longer and alternative cannulation techniques seemed to be needed more frequently for successful cannulation in female than male patients, no statistically significant differences (p = 0.061 and 0.054, respectively) in the cannulation process could be found between the genders.

CONCLUSIONS

The study was not able to confirm that the cannulation of the female papilla is more troublesome than the cannulation of the male papilla.

Anesthesiologist assistance in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures in the elderly: is it worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

Anesthesiologists provide sedation of the patients for mini-invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at many institutions at present, particularly for the elderly. The purpose of the present study was to define the safety of sedation and the tolerance of ERCP procedures in the extremely elderly patients at our institution, in which sedation is provided and controlled by endo team only.

METHODS

Forty-one ERCP procedures were performed in patients aged 90 years or older. All patients had chronic concomitant diseases, and 88% of the patients belonged to American Society of Anesthesiologists group IV. The patients were sedated with midazolam, and 7 out of 41 patients received fentanyl.

RESULTS

All ERCP procedures except one could be successfully completed, indicating good tolerance in 98% of the patients. There were neither sedation-related complications nor procedural mortality. In none of the cases, anesthesiologist assistance was needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine anesthesiological assistance in ERCP procedures in the elderly seems unnecessary.

Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy without Routine Intraoperative Cholangiography: A Retrospective Analysis of 1101 Consecutive Cases

Background:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is today the operation of choice for symptomatic gallstone disease. Before the laparoscopic era intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was generally considered as a fundamental step in cholecystectomy while nowadays the role of IOC is controversial: is there a need for IOC to specify anatomy of biliary tree in order to avoid bile duct injuries (BDI) and to detect possible common bile duct (CBD) stones or not?

Patients and Methods:

We studied retrospectively all the elective LCs done in Turku City Hospital for Surgery during the ten years (1992–2001). Cholecystectomy was performed to 1101 patients, 874 (79%) female and 227 (21%) male patients, mean age 53y (range 15–89). LC was possible in 1022 (93%) cases while 79 (7%) had to be converted to open procedure. The number and severity of bile duct injuries were recorded. The cases with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) during the follow-up and the findings in ERCP and MRCP were recorded from patient records and radiological database.

Results:

IOC was performed in 32 operations (20 in LC and 12 after conversion) and CBD stones were found in seven patients. There were four primary BDIs: two CBD injuries and two minor bile leaks. During a mean follow-up of 72 months (range 36–144) ERCP was performed in 16 and MRCP in three patients. Three patients underwent both MRCP and ERCP. CBD stones were detected in ten patients and a postoperative late CBD stricture was found in one case.

Conclusions:

According to our data, both the incidence of BDIs (0.5%) and symptomatic postoperative CBD stones (0.9%) remain low without the routine use of IOC.

Clinical success of ERCP procedures in nonagenarian patients with bile duct stones

In the general population, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures are the gold standard in the treatment of bile duct stones. However, repeat endoscopic procedures and sometimes even open surgery are needed in difficult cases with retaining bile duct stones. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical success of ERCP procedures in the treatment of bile duct stones in extremely old patients. A retrospective data review comprising prospective data collection and double-entry bookkeeping of 23 therapeutic ERCPs in 20 nonagenarians with bile duct stones was conducted between 1997 and 2007. The primary ERCP procedure was the definitive treatment in 17 out of 20 patients with bile duct stones, giving a clinical success rate of 85 % for the first endoscopic procedure. In the remaining three patients, a repeat ERCP procedure had to be done in the follow-up. After these three repeat procedures with successful outcome, the clinical success of endoscopic treatment was 100%. There was no further recurrent biliary obstruction in any of the patients prior to death which occurred after a mean of 38 months (two patients are still alive), and no open surgery had to be performed in these patients. To be concluded, endoscopic treatment modality seems to be excellent in extremely elderly patients with bile duct stones.

Advances in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cannulation

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is an important tool in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatobiliary diseases. A critical step in this procedure is deep cannulation of the bile duct as failure of cannulation generally results in an aborted procedure and failed intervention. Expert endoscopists usually achieve a high rate of successful cannulation while those less experienced typically have a much lower rate and a greater incidence of complications. Prolonged attempts at cannulation can result in significant morbidity to patients, anxiety for endoscopists, unnecessary radiation exposure and inefficient patient care. Here we review the most common endoscopic techniques used to achieve selective biliary cannulation. Pharmacologic aids to cannulation are also discussed briefly in this review.

Management of difficult bile duct cannulation in ERCP

In Encoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the main concern is to gain access into the bile duct while avoiding the pancreatic duct because of the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Difficult cannulation is defined as a situation where the endoscopist, using his/her regularly used cannulation technique, fails within a certain time limit or after a certain number of unsuccessful attempts. Different methods have been developed to manage difficult cannulation. The most common solution is to perform a precut papillotomy either with a needle knife or with a sphincterotome with or without a guide wire. This review describes different methods to overcome cases of difficult cannulation. We will discuss the success rate and complication rates associated with different methods of reaching the biliary tract.

Prophylactic pancreas stenting followed by needle-knife fistulotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and difficult cannulation: new method to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to reduce post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications with a combination of early needle-knife access fistulotomy and prophylactic pancreatic stenting in selected high-risk sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) patients with difficult cannulation.

METHODS

Prophylactic pancreatic stent insertion was attempted in 22 consecutive patients with definite SOD and difficult cannulation. After 10 min of failed selective common bile duct cannulation, but repeated (>5x) pancreatic duct contrast filling, a prophylactic small calibre (3-5 Fr) pancreatic stent was inserted, followed by fistulotomy with a standard needle-knife, then a standard complete biliary sphincterotomy followed. The success and complication rates were compared retrospectively with a cohort of 35 patients, in which we persisted with the application of standard methods of cannulation without pre-cutting methods.

RESULTS

Prophylactic pancreatic stenting followed by needle-knife fistulotomy was successfully carried out in all 22 consecutive patients, and selective biliary cannulation and complete endoscopic sphincterotomy were achieved in all but two cases. In this group, not a single case of post-ERCP pancreatitis was observed, in contrast with a control group of three mild, 10 moderate and two severe post-ERCP pancreatitis cases. The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly different: 0% versus 43%, as were the post-procedure (24 h mean) amylase levels: 206 U/L versus 1959 U/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected, high-risk, SOD patients, early, prophylactic pancreas stent insertion followed by needle-knife fistulotomy seems a safe and effective procedure with no or only minimal risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. However, prospective, randomized studies are awaited to lend to support to our approach.

Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The majority of recent large series on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications have been multicenter studies reflecting varying degrees of experience and ERCP volume; major ERCP complications are associated with low case volume. The aim of this study was to report and analyze the frequency of severe and fatal complications associated with ERCP at a single specialized surgical high-volume referral center (Turku University Central Hospital).

METHODS

All scheduled ERCP procedures (n = 2788) at our unit between January 1997 and December 2005 were included and the procedure-related severe and fatal complications were assessed by retrospective chart review. Complications were classified as severe or fatal according to standardized guidelines.

RESULTS

The number of ERCP procedures performed was 2555, of which 71% were therapeutic and 29% were diagnostic. Seventeen (0.8%) severe complications were identified in 16 patients, of whom 15 underwent a therapeutic endoscopic procedure. Of the 17 severe complications, perforation constituted five cases (0.2%), pancreatitis occurred in five patients (0.2%), bleeding in five cases (0.2%), and two patients suffered from purulent cholangitis (0.1%). Procedure-related mortality was 0.08% (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study the rate of severe or fatal complications of ERCP is low in experienced hands at a high-volume center, comparing favorably to corresponding complication rates of multicenter series, which further supports the importance of centralizing ERCP procedures in high-volume advanced centers.

Unsuccessful Endoscopic Stenting in Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury

Patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury often require a variety of interventions that may range from endoscopic procedures to complex open surgery. Injuries involving both stricture and leakage, in particular, are a clinical challenge as early measures are mandatory because of leakage. However, early open surgery is often hazardous in these cases because of ongoing infection at the point of injury and around it caused by the leakage. Therefore, these patients should be treated endoscopically and percutaneously as long as possible, although iatrogenic, often narrow stricture hampers these efforts. In the present paper, the clinical value of a rendezvous technique is emphasized. This technique improves the success rate for endoscopic stenting in iatrogenic bile duct injuries. In the literature, there are no earlier reports on biliary rendezvous procedures in patients with bile duct injuries.

Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic bile duct injury carries high morbidity. After the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy the incidence of these injuries has at least doubled, and even after the learning curve, the incidence has plateaued at the level of 0.5%.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients sustained biliary tract injuries of the 3736 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in and around Turku University Central Hospital between January 1995 and April 2002. The data concerning primary treatment and long-term results were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The overall incidence for bile duct injuries, including all the minor injuries (cystic duct leaks and bile duct strictures), was 0.86%; for major injuries alone the incidence was 0.38%. Nineteen percent of the injuries were detected intraoperatively. All the cystic duct leaks were treated endoscopically with a 90% success rate. Of the bile duct strictures 88% were treated successfully with endoscopic techniques. Ninety-three percent of the major injuries, including tangential lesions of common bile duct and total transections, were treated operatively. The operation of choice was either hepaticojejunostomy or cholangiojejunostomy in 69% of the cases; the rest were treated with simple suturing over a T-tube or an endoscopically placed stent. The long-term results, with a median follow-up period of 7.5 years, are good in 79% of the operated patients and in 84% of the whole study population. Mortality rate was 3% and acute or chronic cholangitis was seen in 13% of the patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Most of the minor bile duct injuries, including cystic duct leaks and bile duct strictures, are well treatable with endoscopic techniques, whereas most of the major injuries require operative treatment, which at optimal circumstances gives good results.

Minimizing complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a major tool in the diagnosis and management of numerous biliary and pancreatic conditions, including choledocholithiasis as well as benign and malignant pancreatic diseases, especially those causing biliary obstruction. Since the procedure's inception, the techniques and indications have evolved along with advances in technology and an improved understanding of risks associated with ERCP. The trend has been away from purely diagnostic procedures; most ERCPs are now therapeutic in intent. ERCP remains among the more invasive of endoscopic procedures, with significant rates of complications that can be major. As advances are made in less invasive technology, it is important to understand the complications of ERCP and how best to avoid them.