Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia

The dissemination of surgical clinical practice guidelines-evaluating SAGES' strategies for distribution

BACKGROUND

The Society of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has been a leader in the development of surgical clinical practice guidelines; however, the dissemination and implementation of these remains a challenge. We aim to analyze the user interaction with the SAGES website (sages.org) guidelines' page and guideline downloads from their associated journal Surgical Endoscopy to help inform the organization about its distribution and dissemination methods.

METHODS

Google analytics from the sages.org website and Surgical Endoscopy downloads for each guideline were obtained from July 2023 to April 2024, as well as number of downloads for the lifetime of the guideline. Data were organized by overall guideline popularity, defined as number of sages.org views or number of journal downloads, and its associated citations. Popularity by country was only informed by google analytics data from sages.org. The country's associated economic status-high, upper middle, lower middle, and low-income was obtained and a chi-squared test, applied to proportions, was performed on each guideline to determine if the economic status of the country significantly influences guideline popularity (p-value less than 0.05, confidence interval 95%).

RESULTS

The hiatal hernia guideline had the most sages.org views and citations over the 9-month period; however, the management of diverticulitis guideline had the most journal downloads from time of publication. Colorectal surgery (CRS) guidelines were the most popular category in journal downloads which was not observed in sages.org views. Additionally, the popularity significantly differed in four guidelines based on the country's economic status.

CONCLUSIONS

Society websites and journals were found to be reasonable platforms for dissemination of guidelines, with viewership and download numbers in the tens of thousands for some articles. The variability in engagement across platforms may suggest different audiences with different needs. The data emphasizes the importance of SAGES diversifying their platforms for broader dissemination.

Effectiveness of anterior gastropexy with mesh reinforcement in reducing the recurrence of giant hiatal hernia

BACKGROUND

The number of patients with giant hiatal hernias requiring surgery is increasing. However, there have been some concerns regarding the possible high recurrence rates. Additional gastropexy has been suggested to reduce recurrence rates. This study aimed to examine whether additional gastropexy is effective in patients with giant hiatal hernias.

METHODS

We enrolled 77 patients with giant hiatal hernias who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair between June 2011 and December 2022. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of gastropexy, the surgical outcomes and recurrence of hiatal hernia between the groups were compared.

RESULTS

The gastropexy group included 52 patients (68%). Although the operating time was longer in the gastropexy than in the non- gastropexy group (P < 0.01), there were no differences in the pre- and post- operative complications between the two groups. Surgery with gastropexy significantly improved symptoms, such as heartburn, reflux, chest pain, and vomiting, as well as the pathology of hiatal hernia, cardiac loosening, and esophagitis. The rates of recurrence of hiatal hernia and esophagitis were significantly lower in the gastropexy than in the non- gastropexy group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic anterior gastropexy is safe and effective for preventing the recurrence of giant hiatal hernias.

Discrepancies in the Reporting of Hiatal Hernia Size: A Review

BackgroundIn the current literature there is a paucity of both standardized diagnostic criteria and accurate methods for determining hernia size. The aim of this review is to describe the most common methods for reporting hiatal hernia size.MethodsLiterature search using PubMed and Embase databases was performed. After exclusion and screening, 67 articles were analyzed and data were collected on hernia type and subtype, diagnostic method, size reporting method, and the author's definition of hernia size (measurement protocol).ResultsAuthors publishing on hiatal hernia size employed 8 different methods for diagnosing hiatal hernias and reported data using 7 distinct measurement types. Within individual diagnostic methods there was a further lack of standardization of measurement protocols.ConclusionOur review underscores the critical need for standardized reporting methods in the assessment and reporting of hiatal hernia size. Moving forward, collaboration is essential to establish and adopt standardized guidelines for reporting hiatal hernia size, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.

Innovative laparoscopic 'Tunnel' approach in managing hiatal hernia with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia (HH) is a major cause of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and laparoscopic repair combined with anti-reflux surgery is a common treatment. However, postoperative complications such as vagus nerve injury remain a concern. This study introduces a novel Laparoscopic "Tunnel" Approach aiming to minimize damage to the vagus nerve and preserve perigastric vessels.

METHODS

Clinical data were consecutively collected from patients who underwent laparoscopic "tunnel" approach for the treatment of hiatal hernia combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University between June 2023 and June 2024. Data collected included age, gender, BMI, DeMeester score, surgical time, and postoperative symptoms. Follow-ups were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The average age was 54 ± 9 years, BMI was 25.56 ± 4.32 kg/m2, DeMeester score was 118.05 ± 17.71, and GERD-Q score was 13 ± 2. The average surgical time was 115 ± 15 min. Postoperatively, symptoms significantly improved, with an average GERD-Q score of 5 ± 1 at 6 months. At 1 month, dysphagia was observed in 14 patients, belching in 19, abdominal distension in 5, nausea in 16, and diarrhea in 8. By 6 months, only 2 patients exhibited belching, with no other symptoms persisting. No cases of vomiting or gallstones were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The Laparoscopic "Tunnel" Approach may effectively minimizes vagus nerve injury and preserves perigastric vessels, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes and quality of life. This method shows potential for wider application in treating HH and GERD. However, since this study was retrospective and lacked a control group, further studies are needed to verify our conclusions.

Postoperative obstruction of recurrent esophageal hiatal hernia: A case report

RATIONALE

Surgical repair is considered the optimal treatment for hiatal hernia (HH); however, postoperative complications, such as obstruction, can occur, which may complicate recovery. This case report details a patient who experienced postoperative obstruction following laparoscopic adhesiolysis combined with transabdominal HH repair and Nissen fundoplication for recurrent esophageal HH.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 64-year-old female presented with a 3-year history of worsening shortness of breath during physical activity. She also reported upper abdominal pain, postprandial vomiting, and difficulty swallowing, all of which significantly compromised her quality of life. The patient had a 5-year history of diabetes, with no notable family or genetic history. Three years prior, she underwent laparoscopic HH repair at a local hospital, but specific details of that surgery were not available.

DIAGNOSES

HH was confirmed through computed tomography scans of the chest and upper abdomen, as well as serial examinations of the upper digestive tract.

INTERVENTION

On March 9, 2023, the patient underwent laparoscopic abdominal adhesion release, transabdominal HH repair, and Nissen fundoplication. Postoperatively, she received parenteral nutrition, acid inhibition, and symptomatic treatment for deswelling to alleviate abdominal pain and vomiting. However, the patient was unable to tolerate oral intake due to obstruction.

OUTCOMES

A contrast study revealed high obstruction at the distal esophagus, specifically at the junction of the stomach and esophagus, likely at the cardia. Subsequently, on April 6, 2023, the patient underwent a second laparoscopic exploration and adhesiolysis under general anesthesia. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well and was discharged on April 14, 2023. During the 12-month follow-up on April 30, 2024, she reported returning to normal daily activities with no complaints of discomfort.

LESSONS

This case highlights that laparoscopic adhesiolysis combined with transabdominal HH repair and Nissen fundoplication can effectively address recurrent esophageal HH along with postoperative obstruction. The findings provide important insights for the individualization of surgical procedures for patients with HH.

Post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia following minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has emerged as the preferred surgical method for esophageal cancer resulting from lower morbidity rates for MIE compared to open surgery. However, post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia (PEHH), also known as paraconduit hernia, once rare, is now increasingly observed as a late complication. This study aims to ascertain the prevalence, predictive factors, and surgical management of PEHH following MIE in esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE between 2013 and 2023. Patients with PEHH were identified through clinical presentation and CT scans and compared to those without PEHH using statistical tests. Variables with p-values less than 0.2 were subjected to multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 371 patients, predominantly male with locally advanced disease (stages 2-4, 90.8%), 25 (6.7%) developed PEHH after a median interval of 24 months post-MIE. The PEHH group exhibited significantly lower BMI and shorter ICU stays. On multivariate analysis BMI < 25 kg/m2 (OR 2.96, CI 1.22-7.20, p = 0.02) and ICU stays (OR 0.67, CI 0.47-0.96, p = 0.03) were independent predictors of PEHH. Surgical repair was performed in 84% of PEHH cases, with 60% symptomatic and 48% emergency surgery. The minimally invasive approach was implemented in 15 patients (71.4%). Primary repair was successfully conducted in 14 cases (66.7%), while mesh was used in one-third of patients.

CONCLUSION

The increasing prevalence of PEHH with MIE warrants attention. A lower BMI and shorter ICU stay was associated with PEHH. Most cases are symptomatic and effectively managed through minimally invasive techniques.

Incarceration of a part of the gastric wall into the abdominal cavity in a patient with hiatal hernia and complete dislocation of the stomach (upside-down stomach)

An upside-down stomach is a rare type of hiatal hernia. An 83-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed an upside-down stomach and the incarceration of a part of the gastric body into the abdominal cavity. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a circular ulcer caused by gastric ischemia. Although she was discharged after 1 week of conservative therapy, she was readmitted to the hospital 1 day after discharge because of a recurrence of hiatal hernia incarceration. She underwent laparoscopic surgery 4 days after readmission and recovered successfully.

Long-term durability and temporal pattern of revisional surgery of laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair

Laparoscopic repair is the preferred surgical treatment for symptomatic Large Hiatal Hernia (LHH). However, data on long-term outcomes are limited. This study aims to evaluate the 20-year follow-up results of laparoscopic LHH repair in a high-volume experienced tertiary center. Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic LHH repair between 1992 and 2008. Preoperative and perioperative data were collected. The primary endpoint was the long-term reoperation rate. Survival analyses were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to investigate predictive factors of the need for revisional surgery. A total of 176 patients were included. All the procedures were performed laparoscopically, and in 5 cases (3.0%) with a robot-assisted approach. Mesh-augmented cruroplasty was performed in 26 patients (15.8%). A fundoplication was added in all patients: Nissen in 158 (89.8%), Toupet in 5 (2.8%), and Collis-Nissen in 13 (7.4%). Postoperative mean follow-up was 224.6 ± 83.3 months. Clinically significant hiatal hernia recurrence occurred in 27 (16.2%), and 18 patients (10.2%) underwent surgical revision. The median time-to-redo was 12 months (IQR 6-42 months). Overall durability without revisional surgery at 20-year follow-up was 90%. The rate of revisional surgery after LHH repair is low and is generally required within 12 months from primary surgery. Our results highlight the long-lasting effects of LHH repair at 20-year follow-up.

One-year outcomes of biological mesh in hiatal hernia repair: a real-world study

PURPOSE

The placement of synthetic mesh during laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair has been verified to reduce postoperative recurrence, but mesh erosion and other related complications may occur to synthetic mesh, and our aim was to verify the safety and efficacy of biological mesh in hiatal hernia repair.

METHODS

Patients with hiatal hernia who were treated at a tertiary teaching university hospital from December 2020 to May 2023 were prospectively included in this study. General clinical data, hernia-related data, and intraoperative data were collected, and the patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, after 12 months, follow-up as needed for primary outcome until September 2024. The following parameters were recorded during follow-up visit: gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, Gastroesophageal reflux disease-Health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire, postoperative recurrence, mesh-related complications and patients' overall satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients with hiatal hernia were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 62.68 ± 15.93 years, mean BMI 24.81 ± 4.05 kg/m2, the average operation time was 128.21 ± 39.20 min. There was statistically significant improvement of GERD symptom postoperative (p<0.05). 72 cases (93.5%) were rated as "Great" on the GERD-HRQL at the 12 months after surgery; 65 cases (84.4%) were rated as "very satisfactory" on the overall satisfaction scale at the 12 months after surgery. 6 patients (7.3%) experienced recurrences, with no mesh-related complications reported during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

At a mean follow-up of 25.43 ± 10.38 months, the present study showed that laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with biologic mesh results in low rates of 1-year recurrence and complications and increased patient satisfaction.

The role of gastropexy in paraesophageal hernia repair: A scoping review of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Paraesophageal hernias (PEH), involving abdominal components herniating through the esophageal hiatus, pose serious risks like obstruction and perforation, prompting SAGES to recommend repair upon symptom onset in 2013. Despite surgical advancements, high recurrence rates persist post-PEH repair. Gastropexy, securing the stomach to prevent re-herniation, emerges as a potential solution. However, consensus on its application is lacking. This review aims to map existing research, summarize evidence, and identify gaps guiding future gastropexy research in PEH repair.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, this scoping review conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Eligible studies, including RCTs, observational, and cohort studies, described gastropexy for PEH treatment in adults published in English after 2013. Articles were rigorously screened, with data extracted and organized into tables detailing study characteristics, conditions, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A search yielded 343 studies on gastropexy for PEH, with 17 meeting inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective (47.1 %) or case series (41.2 %). GP, primarily in types III and IV hernias, was mainly performed laparoscopically. Anterior GP was most commonly used (in 64.7 % of included studies), with some studies using additional techniques. Reduced recurrence rates were seen when adjunct procedures such as fundoplication were performed with gastropexy.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the varied application of gastropexy in PEH repair, aiming to reconcile differing surgeon opinions. The data suggests gastropexy can be safely utilised across different techniques, offering a viable option for addressing PEH and reducing hernia recurrence, particularly in high-risk cases.

Hiatal Hernia Repair: A Century Between Soresi and da Vinci

A minimally invasive approach is the most common technique for hiatal hernia repair. The robotic platform offers a unique advantage that addresses the limitations of a laparoscopic repair. The steps of a robotic hiatal hernia repair include reduction of hernia contents, dissection of hernia sac, circumferential dissection of esophagus with 2.5 to 3 cm of intraabdominal esophagus, crural closure, and partial or complete fundoplication. The robotic hiatal hernia repair has comparable perioperative outcomes to the laparoscopic approach. This article discusses current controversies, limitations, and new technologies.

Laparoscopic fundoplication improves esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a high-volume single-center controlled study in the era of high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH impedance

BACKGROUND

Most existing literature studies reported that laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis. However, the effect of the wrap on esophageal motility is still debated. This study aimed to assess how a functioning and effective fundoplication could affect esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

This study analyzed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) fundoplication or laparoscopic Toupet (LT) fundoplication for GERD at our department between 2010 and 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ), barium swallow, endoscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and 24-hour pH impedance (multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring [MII-pH]) before and after surgery. HRM was reviewed by 2 experts, following the criteria of the Chicago Classification (version 4.0). LF failure was objectively defined in case of abnormal postoperative MII-pH according to the Lyon 2.0 criteria with/without an abnormal GerdQ.

RESULTS

During the study period, 124 patients with GERD (89 males and 35 females) were recruited. Of note, 58 patients underwent LN fundoplication, and 66 patients underwent LT fundoplication. All procedures were completed laparoscopically, and the 90-day postoperative mortality was nil. At the postoperative MII-pH, good outcome was recorded in 103 patients, and failure was recorded in 21 patients. There was a significant association between a successful LF and the normalization of esophageal motility (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed that LF is an effective treatment in patients with GERD, regardless of esophageal motility status. Moreover, our results indicate that LF could determine a normalization of motility abnormalities in patients with GERD.

Russian Consensus: Standardization of Indications for Surgical Treatment of GERD

Aim: to present the results of an Expert Consensus on standardization of indications for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Materials and methods. The issues of standardization of indications for surgical treatment of GERD were discussed by 39 experts – leading gastroenterologists and surgeons from 7 cities of Russia, representing 17 institutions. The list of questions for discussion was formed by the initiative group and sent to the experts. The experts reviewed recent literature, including existing clinical guidelines and consensuses, assessed the evidence base and suggested statements for voting based on the analysis of relevant provisions of foreign consensuses, high-level scientific publications, which set out information obtained in the course of studies that meet the criteria of evidence-based medicine, positions on this issue in the Russian Federation, and suggested statements for voting. Delphi method was used to reach the consensus.Results. GERD is the most common benign esophageal disorder. Surgery is considered one of the treatment methods for GERD. In real clinical practice, selection of patients who may benefit from surgery is challenging. The results of surgical and conservative treatment of GERD are comparable. Surgical treatment should be performed in a specialized hospital only after a joint examination with a gastroenterologist confirming the diagnosis of GERD. An appropriate volume of preoperative diagnostic workup, matters related to surgical interventions in case of incomplete response to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and when extraesophageal manifestations of GERD are present were discussed. The consensus reviews the indications, contraindications and possible results of antireflux operations in patients with GERD. The value of endoscopy, esophageal manometry, pH monitoring/pH-impedance monitoring and X-ray polypositional examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract as a preoperative examination of the patient is analysed. Conclusions. The experts reached the consensus on 20 statements on standardization of indications for surgical treatment of GERD.

Surgical strategies for recurrent hiatal hernia: three-point fundoplication fixation

BACKGROUND

The management of a recurrent (symptomatic) hiatal hernia remains controversial. This study aimed to review the outcomes of patients who underwent recurrent repair of hiatal hernias.

METHODS

Thirteen patients who underwent recurrent hiatal hernia repairs at our hospital between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed retrospectively. The postoperative outcomes and complications of these patients were investigated.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were included in this study. The median time of reoperation from the previous hiatal hernia repair was 3 years (IQR, 2.5-5). Patients with a history of only one repair accounted for 76.9%, whereas those with two repairs accounted for 23.1%. All reoperations were completed laparoscopically. No deaths or readmissions during the 30-day postoperative period were recorded at an average of 30.5 ± 20.9 (6-68) months of follow-up. No other complications or symptoms were recorded, and oral medication was discontinued in eleven (84.6%) patients. The average GERD-Q score was 6.7 ± 1.3 postoperatively, whereas it was 10.4 ± 3.0 preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

We present several surgical strategies for addressing the recurrence of hiatal hernias. The key is not only to accurately close the hernia ring but also to fix the fundoplication to reduce the impact on the tissue around the hiatus to reduce the incidence of recurrence. Our three-point fixation technique showed promising effects in preventing recurrence but needs further study.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

ChiCTR2100049995.

Fundoplication at the time of paraesophageal hernia repair does not decrease the rate of hernia recurrence or postoperative reflux

BACKGROUND

Fundoplication at the time of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair is thought to help prevent the development or persistence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) and might also prevent hernia recurrence. However, the published data is not strong enough to definitively recommend this approach. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of a fundoplication at the time of paraesophageal hernia repair.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent a paraesophageal hernia repair at a single institution over a 14 year period from 2010 to 2023. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, those who underwent fundoplication at the time of PEH repair and those who did not. Rates of PEH recurrence, rates of reoperation for a recurrent PEH, postoperative dysphagia rates, and postoperative GERD rates were then compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

There were 1,155 patients included in the study. There were 610 (53%) patients who underwent PEH repair with fundoplication and 545 (47%) who did not undergo a fundoplication. 113 (19%) of the patients who underwent fundoplication developed a hernia recurrence compared to 67 (12%) who had a PEH repair alone (p = 0.004). However, each cohort had similar rates of requiring reoperation (p = 0.4). Inclusion of a fundoplication did lead to higher rates of postoperative dysphagia > 30 days postoperatively, 12% vs 7% (p = 0.002), but did not lead to decreased rates of symptomatic GERD postoperatively, 7% with a fundoplication and 7% without (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

In this present study, fundoplication at the time of PEH repair did not prevent hernia recurrence, need for reoperation, or decrease postoperative GERD rates but does increase postoperative dysphagia. While there are definite indications for fundoplication at the time of PEH repair (i.e., type 1 hernia), these data do not support the routine use of fundoplication during PEH repair with a normal gastroesophageal flap valve intraoperatively.

Sliding hiatus hernia (intrathoracic sleeve migration) post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A case series and review of literature

ABSTRACT

Intrathoracic sleeve migration (ITSM) is a complication that uncommonly occurs post-sleeve gastrectomy, with an incidence rate anecdotally ranging from 5% to 45%. Its treatment has established difficulties by bariatric surgeons worldwide. Sixteen cases were shown in this case series that commonly encountered the symptoms of weight gain, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), epigastric pain, globus sensation, nausea and vomiting as their initial complaints before their diagnosis. Moreover, these symptoms began a few years after the gastric sleeve. The confirmatory results through gastrografin and computed tomography abdomen were performed where relevant findings of Grade I or II GERD, sliding hiatal hernia and post-sleeve anatomy were appreciated. In literature, the most common modality used to treat ITSM was the conversion to Roux-en-Y bypass. However, other treatment modalities were also utilised for the cases presented due to the different patients' preferences, including mini-gastric bypass and laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with/without posterior cruroplasty and buttress plication with the falciform ligament. In addition, anchoring to pre-pancreatic fascia post-gastric sleeve has been shown to prevent such presentations further in the future. Postoperatively, all patients were stable with no complications acutely or after 3 months follow-up. Hence, this concludes that despite Roux-en-Y being considered the golden standard treatment of ITSM, laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with cruroplasty and plication reflects an equivalent, cost-effective and valuable alternative to treating relevant patients.

Antireflux surgery - choosing the right candidate

INTRODUCTION

Surgical gastric fundoplication is an effective treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease. In contrast to acid suppression, fundoplication nearly abolishes all types of reflux, acid and nonacid. However, in some cases, lasting side effects of the procedure may overshadow its positive effects. It has remained difficult to determine which patients are the most suitable candidates for fundoplication.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to evaluate the available data on preoperative factors that are associated with the outcome of fundoplication and to determine which combination of patient characteristics and preoperative test results provides optimal selection. In addition, we assess the need for tailoring the procedure on the basis of the preoperative quality of esophageal peristalsis.

EXPERT OPINION

Surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease is underutilized as it may provide an excellent option for a subset of GERD patients. It is not sensible to restrict surgical treatment to patients who do not respond to acid suppression. However, meticulous patient selection is key. Most importantly, surgical treatment should not be considered in patients in whom there is no convincing evidence that the symptoms are caused by reflux. Impaired esophageal peristalsis should not be regarded as a contraindication against fundoplication.

Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair: Short-Term Results From Yemen in a Resource-Limited Setting

Background The laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery with anti-reflux procedure is the preferred method for hiatal hernia repair, showcasing a noticeable decrease in surgery-related morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate various elements and variables that could affect and enhance the advantages of minimally invasive surgery for hiatal hernias and minimize the chances of complications occurring both during and after laparoscopic repair with fundoplication for hiatal hernia. Methods Hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication as anti-reflux surgery was conducted to evaluate perioperative and postoperative outcomes at Aden Hospital between 2023 and 2024. The inclusion criteria included patients with hiatal hernia and a positive history of gastroesophageal reflux treated with laparoscopic minimally invasive hernial repair involving anti-reflux procedures such as laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication or Dor fundoplication. Data on baseline population characteristics, including age and gender, as well as hernia types (type 1, 2, 3, and 4), hernia size, and the surgical techniques used were collected. Information regarding operative duration, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay was also gathered. Follow-up assessments were conducted at one, three, six, and 12 months. Results From 2023 to 2024, a total of 21 individuals underwent minimally invasive laparoscopic hiatal hernial repair, which included 12 (57%) females and nine (43%) males, with an average age of 55 years (ages ranging from 35 to 80 years). Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux such as heartburn manifested in 18 (85%) patients. Three (14%) patients had abdominal surgery history. The types of hiatal hernia observed were as follows: 12 patients had type 1, five had type 2, three had type 3, and one had type 4. Conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery was performed in one case (4.7%). Sixteen (76.1%) patients had laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with Nissen fundoplication, three (14.2%) patients had Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication, and two (9.5%) patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy along with hiatal hernia repair. The average duration of the operation was 116 ± 60 minutes, while the average length of hospital stay was 3 ± 1.5 days. There was one (4.7%) patient with intraoperative complication (pneumothorax), and 15 (71.4%) patients were free of postoperative complications; however, four (19%) patients complained of postoperative flatulence and abdominal distension, one (4.7%) patient complained of transient recurrent reflux and dysphagia, and one (4.7%) patient had aspiration pneumonia and death. Recurrent hiatal hernia was not detected during follow-up at three to 12 months after laparoscopic surgery. Conclusions Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with anti-reflux surgery can be successful in resource-limited settings, providing an effective and safe option for managing hiatal hernias and alleviating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

A retrospective study assessing RefluxStop surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Clinical outcomes in 79 patients from Germany

Background

This study reports outcomes of the RefluxStop procedure treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in clinical practice at a high-volume regional hospital in Germany.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 79 patients with chronic GERD that underwent the RefluxStop procedure, comprising high mediastinal dissection, loose cruroplasty, esophagogastroplication between vagal trunks, and fundus invagination of the RefluxStop implant. The primary outcome was GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL) score and improvement from baseline. Secondary outcomes included proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and intra- and postoperative complications, including dysphagia, esophageal dilatation, and reoperation.

Results

Baseline characteristics (n = 79) included large hiatal hernia >3 cm (32.4 %) and previous antireflux surgery (20.3 %). At mean (SD) follow-up of 11 (4.4) months ranging from 4 to 19 months, the median (IQR) and mean (SD) improvements in GERD-HRQL score were 100 % (90.2-100 %) and 92.4 % (13.9 %) from baseline, respectively. Significant reduction in PPI use was observed from a baseline of 94.9 % to 2.5 % at follow-up. All cases of preoperative dysphagia (7.6 %) completely resolved. New-onset, mild dysphagia occurred in one subject (1.3 %) at final follow-up. One subject (1.3 %) experienced asymptomatic device migration into the stomach, likely due to surgical technique with a much too tight invagination, with subsequent conversion to Toupet fundoplication.

Conclusion

Analysis of this cohort that underwent RefluxStop surgery indicates excellent safety and effectiveness over this short-term follow-up. Significant improvements in quality of life and PPI use were observed in a population where half had either large hiatal hernia >3 cm or reoperation for previously failed antireflux surgery, a demographic with usually much higher complication rates.

ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF MESH MIGRATION FOLLOWING HIATAL HERNIA REPAIR

BACKGROUND

The use of mesh in the repair of large hiatal hernias is still controversial. One of the most feared adverse events related to the use of mesh is erosion into the esophageal and gastric walls.

AIMS

To record the endoscopic treatment of mesh that has migrated into the gastric lumen after surgical treatment of hiatal hernia.

METHODS

The technical option was to wait for the progressive migration of the mesh into the gastric lumen, monitoring with upper digestive endoscopy, with removal by traction at the best time, with the aid of foreign body forceps.

RESULTS

The mesh was completely removed, and the evolution was satisfactory, without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mesh migration into the stomach who are oligosymptomatic and do not show signs of complications, endoscopic surveillance and subsequent removal of the foreign body can be successfully performed when the mesh is not adhered to the gastric wall, avoiding surgical procedures with high morbidity and mortality.

Causal relationships between depression, emotional changes, and hiatal hernia: A Mendelian randomization analysis

Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the displacement of abdominal contents, particularly the stomach, into the thoracic cavity. This condition is frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and can lead to various symptoms, including chronic cough and respiratory issues. Despite its prevalence, the mechanisms linking psychological factors to HH are not well understood. Observational studies have suggested correlations between mental health issues - such as stress, anxiety, and depression - and gastrointestinal disorders, indicating that emotional states may influence the development of HH. This study aims to clarify the causal relationships between mood swings, depression, and the risk of developing HH using Mendelian randomization (MR), a robust method that utilizes genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) to infer causality. Data for this MR analysis were obtained from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We employed a bidirectional, 2-sample MR approach, using IVs associated with mood swings, depression, feelings of tension, and feelings of misery as exposures, with HH as the outcome. A reverse MR analysis was also conducted, treating HH as the exposure and the aforementioned emotional states as outcomes. The primary analytical method used was inverse variance weighting (IVW), supplemented by sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger and weighted median methods. Our analysis revealed significant associations: mood swings (OR = 1.014; 95% CI = 1.001-1.027; P = .032), depression (OR = 1.019; 95% CI = 1.006-1.033; P = .003), feelings of tension (OR = 1.012; 95% CI = 1.004-1.020; P = .001), and feelings of misery (OR = 1.007; 95% CI = 1.003-1.010; P = .0001) significantly increased the risk of HH. Importantly, reverse MR analysis indicated no causal influence of HH on these emotional states. This study provides evidence that mood swings, depression, feelings of tension, and feelings of misery are significant risk factors for developing HH. These findings highlight the need to address psychological factors in the clinical management and prevention strategies for HH, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Fatal Tension Gastrothorax: Two Case Reports

ABSTRACT

Tension gastrothorax is a rare and potentially fatal complication of a diaphragmatic hernia, in which a massively dilated, intrathoracic stomach compresses the lungs and mediastinum, causing cardiorespiratory compromise, in a mechanism akin to tension pneumothorax. Although it is very rare, tension gastrothorax has been reported in the literature; however, such reports are almost exclusively restricted to its clinical presentation and treatment in emergency departments. To the best of our knowledge, no adult autopsy case reports of tension gastrothorax have been reported in the literature. We present 2 adult autopsy case reports in which we believe the cause of death was tension gastrothorax, followed by a discussion of what a tension gastrothorax is and its potential etiology, and finally, we discuss the difficulties of making the diagnosis at autopsy, including how postmortem computed tomography imaging can be hugely beneficial as it was in one of our cases.

Reducing recurrence rates in hiatal hernia repair: Results of a quality improvement study

BACKGROUND

Patient and procedure factors are considered in the decision-making process for surgical repair of hiatal hernias. Recurrence is multi-factorial and has been shown to be related to size, type, BMI and age.

AIMS

This study examined recurrence rates in a single institution, identified areas for improved surgical technique, and re-assessed recurrence following implantation of a quality improvement initiative.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair surgery between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Demographics, pre-operative characteristics, intra-operative procedures and recurrence rates were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients from 2018 to 2020 and 34 patients from 2021 to 2022 were identified. The recurrence rate was 21% in 2018-2020, with 14% requiring a revisional procedure. Recurrence and re-operation were subsequently reduced to 6% in 2021 and 2022, which was statistically significant (p = 0.043). There was an increase in gastropexy from 21% to 41% following the review (p = 0.032), which was mainly reserved for large and giant hernias. Procedural and literature review, alongside gastropexy, can be attributed to recurrence rate reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to educate patients on the likelihood and risk factors of recurrence. A comprehensive review of procedures and a quality improvement program in our facility for hiatal hernia repair is shown to reduce recurrence.

Congenital hiatal hernia with vermis hypoplasia, dysmorphic features and negative genetic study: A case report

Congenital hiatal hernia is a rare congenital defect and often occurs at a sporadic basis, but familial cases have also been reported. Here, we report on a 3-year-old male patient of Middle-Eastern descent, diagnosed at 5 months of age patient presenting with a congenital hiatal hernia, vermis hypoplasia manifested by axial hypotonia and horizontal nystagmus, preauricular tag, and dysmorphic features with negative genetic mutations, not fitting any reported association or syndrome, suggesting the potential existence of a novel disease entity and highlighting the necessity for further exploration into rare genetic conditions for comprehensive patient care and syndrome characterization.

Comparative anatomic and symptomatic recurrence outcomes of diaphragmatic suture cruroplasty versus biosynthetic mesh reinforcement in robotic hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Hiatal and paraesophageal hernia (HH/PEH) recurrence is the most common cause of failure after gastroesophageal anti-reflux surgery. Crural reinforcement with mesh has been suggested to address this issue, but its efficacy remains debated. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of biosynthetic mesh reinforcement compared to suture cruroplasty on anatomic and symptomatic hernia recurrence.

METHOD

Data of patients who underwent robotic HH/PEH repair with suture cruroplasty with or without biosynthetic mesh reinforcement between January 2012 and April 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and anatomic hernia recurrence were assessed at short-term (3 months to 1 year) and longer-term (≥ 1 year) follow-up. Symptomatic hernia recurrence was defined as having both anatomic recurrence and symptoms.

RESULTS

Out of the 503 patients in the study, 308 had undergone biosynthetic mesh repair, while 195 had suture-only repair. After the surgery, both groups demonstrated comparable improvements in symptoms. Short-term anatomic hernia recurrence rates were 11.8% and 15.6% for mesh and suture groups, respectively (p = 0.609), while longer-term rates were 24.7% and 44.9% (p = 0.015). The rates of symptomatic hernia recurrence in the same group were 8.8% and 14.6% in the short-term (p = 0.256), and 17.2% and 42.2% in longer-term follow-ups (p = 0.003). In the repair of medium and large-size hernias, mesh reinforcement resulted in a 50.0% relative risk reduction in anatomic hernia recurrences and a 59.2% reduction in symptomatic hernia recurrences at ≥ 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

After more than a year of follow-up, it has been found that using biosynthetic mesh for medium and large hiatal or paraesophageal hernia repair significantly reduces the likelihood of both anatomic and symptomatic recurrence compared to using only suture cruroplasty. These findings strongly support the use of biosynthetic mesh to manage larger hernias. However, further long-term multicenter randomized studies are needed to provide more conclusive evidence.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: indications for antireflux surgery, outcomes, and side effects

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a frequent digestive disorder that presents with a broad spectrum of symptoms. Global consensus on which patients should be selected for anti-reflux surgery is lacking.

AREAS COVERED

This evidence-based review will analyze current indications for anti-reflux surgery, outcomes of the operation, and potential side effects.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Treatment of GERD has three main purposes: control symptoms, improve quality of life, and prevent potential serious complications such as bleeding, esophageal stenosis, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although medical therapy is effective in the majority of patients, some might require anti-reflux surgery in order to achieve these goals. Adequate patient selection for anti-reflux surgery is critical to obtain optimal outcomes. Most patients undergoing a fundoplication have adequate long-term symptomatic relief. However, potential side effects of anti-reflux surgery should also be discussed with patients to help manage expectations from the operation.

Assessing the effect of body mass index on perioperative outcomes and short-term recurrence after paraesophageal hernia repair

Previous assessments suggest that surgical results of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair were negatively impacted by increasing levels of obesity. A better understanding of the association of obesity on outcomes of PEH repair will support surgeons making evidence-based decisions on the surgical candidacy of individual patients. This single institution retrospective cohort study included 884 consecutive patients with giant PEH undergoing surgical repair between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2020. Preoperative body mass index (BMI) was documented at the time of surgery. Main outcomes included perioperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, major complications, early hernia recurrence, and mortality. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at surgery was 68.4 (11.1), and 645 (73.0%) were women. Among the 884 patients, 875 had a documented immediate preoperative BMI and were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) BMI was 29.24 (4.91) kg/m2. Increasing BMI was not associated with increased perioperative blood loss (coefficient, 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.02), prolonged length of stay (coefficient, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.01), increased incidence of recurrent hernia (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.95-1.10), or increased major complications (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82-1.05). The 90-day mortality rate was 0.3%. Furthermore, when compared with the normal weight group, overweight and all levels of obesity were not related to unfavorable outcomes. No association was found between BMI and perioperative outcomes or short-term recurrence in patients undergoing PEH repair. Although preoperative weight loss is advisable, a higher BMI should not preclude or delay surgical management of giant PEH.

Systematic review of the perioperative classification, diagnosis, description and repair of hiatus hernias in randomized controlled trials

Hiatus hernias (HH) are a common cause of symptoms and complications, with considerable variation in anatomy, function, diagnosis and treatment. We undertook the first systematic review to appraise how HH are diagnosed and classified in the literature, using randomized controlled trials as a sample. A search was performed in July 2021of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and 2832 articles were identified and 64 were included. Median Jadad score was 2. Studies demonstrated considerable variation in diagnosis, classification and minimum surgical steps. The commonest classifications before surgery were axial length and the Type I-IV classification, variably assessed by endoscopy and contrast swallow. Intra-operatively, the commonest classification was type I-IV. A minority used more than one classification, or alternatives such as defect size and Hill classification. Most studies reported minimum steps, but these varied. Only a minority reported criteria for diagnosing recurrence. Using randomized controlled trials to appraise the highest quality evidence in the literature, we found considerable variation and inconsistency in the way HH are diagnosed and classified. This lack of a 'common language' has significant impacts for the generalizability of evidence, study synthesis and design. We propose the development of an internationally accepted classification. We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.

Mesh vs. non-mesh repair of type I hiatal hernias: a propensity-score matching analysis of 6533 patients from the Herniamed registry

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of type I hiatal sliding hernias aims to control the gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and prevention of hernia recurrence. Usually, a cruroplasty is performed to narrow the hiatal orifice. Here, it remains controversial if a mesh reinforcement of the cruroplasty should be performed, since benefits as well as mesh-associated complications have been described.

METHODS

We performed a propensity-score matching analysis with data derived from the Herniamed registry comparing patients undergoing laparoscopic type I hiatal hernia repair with and without synthetic mesh. We analyzed perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data including data derived from the 1-year follow-up in the registry.

RESULTS

6.533 patients with an axial, type I hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux are included in this analysis. Mesh augmentation of the hiatoplasty was performed in n = 1.252/6.533 (19.2%) of patients. The defect size in the subgroup of patients with mesh augmentation was with mean 16.3 cm2 [14.5; 18.2] significantly larger as in the subgroups without mesh augmentation with 10.8 cm2 [8.7; 12.9]; (p < 0.001). In patients with mesh hiatoplasty n = 479 (38.3%) Nissen and n = 773 (61.7%) Toupet fundoplications are performed. 1.207 matched pairs could be analyzed. The mean defect size after matching was with 15.9 cm2 comparable in both groups. A significant association was seen regarding recurrence (4.72% mesh vs. 7.29% non-mesh hiatoplasty, p = 0.012). The same relation can be seen for pain on exertion (8.78% vs 12.10%; p = 0.014) and pain requiring treatment (6.13% vs 9.11%; p = 0.010). All other outcome parameter showed no significant correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that mesh-reinforced laparoscopic type I hiatal hernia repair in larger defects is associated with significantly lower rates for recurrence, pain on exertion and pain requiring treatment.

Cruroplasty as a standalone treatment for recurrent hiatal hernia repair

PURPOSE

Following laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS), recurrence of hiatal hernia is common. Patients with symptomatic recurrence typically undergo revision of the fundoplication or conversion to magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in addition to cruroplasty. However, patients with an intact fundoplication or MSA may only require repeat cruroplasty to repair their recurrent hiatal hernia. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes following cruroplasty alone compared to full revision (i.e. redo fundoplication or MSA with cruroplasty) for the management of recurrent hiatal hernias.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing surgical revision of a symptomatic recurrent hiatal hernia between February 2009 and October 2022 was performed. Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients undergoing cruroplasty alone versus full revision.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis. 93 patients underwent full revision, and 48 patients underwent cruroplasty alone. The mean time between initial and revisional surgery was 8 ± 7.7 years. There was no significant difference in operative time or rates of intra-operative or post-operative complication between groups. Patients undergoing cruroplasty alone had a mean Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health Related Quality Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire score of 9.6 ± 10.2 compared to a mean score of 8.9 ± 11.2 for full revision patients (p = 0.829). Recurrence rates following revision was 10.4% for cruroplasty alone patients and 11.8% in full revision patients (p > 0.999).

CONCLUSION

In patients with intact fundoplication or MSA, cruroplasty alone results in similar post-operative outcomes compared to full revision for recurrent hiatal hernia.

Interval operative management in patients admitted with acute obstruction due to incarcerated paraesophageal hernia

BACKGROUND

Acute incarcerated paraesophageal hernias (PEH) have historically been considered a surgical emergency. Emergent operations have a higher rate of morbidity and mortality compared to elective surgery. Our institution has adopted a strategy of initial conservative management in patients presenting with acute obstruction from an incarcerated PEH who are clinically stable. Patients are given at least 24 h for their symptoms to improve (selective nasogastric decompression). If symptoms resolve, contrast on an upper GI study passes to the small bowel, and liquids are tolerated, patients are discharged with planned interval repair. We sought to characterize the outcomes of this interval surgical strategy for incarcerated PEH.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients admitted to a single institution between October 2019 and September 2023 with an incarcerated PEH. Patients taken directly to surgery within 24 h were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients admitted with obstruction from an incarcerated PEH were identified. Ten patients (22%) were taken urgently to surgery due to clinical instability and were excluded. Of the remaining 35 patients, 23 (66%) resolved their obstruction with conservative non-operative management and were offered planned interval PEH repair (successful conservative management). In the successful conservative management cohort, there was one unplanned readmission before interval PEH repair. Average time between discharge and repair was 25 days. Complication rates did not differ in those who failed and in those who had a successful conservative management result. The cumulative length of stay for those who succeeded in conservative management (including days for the interval surgery) was equivalent with those who underwent PEH repair during the index admission.

CONCLUSION

A trial of conservative management in clinically stable patients with symptomatic incarcerated PEH appears to be safe and often avoids emergent repair without increasing perioperative complications or total days in the hospital.

Late-"de novo" paraesophageal hernia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)-should it be repaired?

BACKGROUND

This study presents a case series of "de novo" paraesophageal hernia (dnPEH) in post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients and analyzes the predisposing factors, symptoms, and outcomes after repair. This is a lesser known complication after RYGB and when symptomatic, may warrant surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of data from a single academic institution from 2002 to 2022 was performed identifying patients who developed dnPEH after RYGB and compared them to patients with primary RYGB without post-operative symptomatic dnPEH. Patient characteristics from initial RYGB were analyzed to identify predisposing factors for dnPEH development. Additional information analyzed included time to dnPEH repair, indications for surgery, types of herniation, type of surgical repair, and symptom resolution.

RESULTS

There were 6975 RYGB in the study period of which 6619 underwent RYGB alone at index surgery, with 31 of those patients developing late stage PEH requiring repair. Patients with older age (51.8 years with dnPEH vs 45.2 years without, p = 0.001) and increased weight loss at 1 year (33.4% vs 30.5%, p = 0.048) from index RYGB were more likely to develop dnPEH. The incidence of dnPEH was 31/6619 (0.47%). Late dnPEH after RYGB took an average of 74 months (45-102 months IQR) to develop symptoms and undergo repair. The most common symptoms were heartburn/reflux 19/31 (61.3%) and epigastric pain 13/31 (41.9%). Symptom resolution rate after repair was highest with 100% for globus and 89.5% heartburn/reflux. The most common form of dnPEH was pouch herniation in 25/31. Surgical repair most commonly included primary cruroplasty alone in 25/31 with additional mesh in 1 case. Recurrence rate was 2/31 (6.54%).

CONCLUSION

Late dnPEH after RYGB is an emerging entity typically occurring years after index RYGB. Symptomatic patients with dnPEH warrant hernia repair and responded well to surgical repair in this case series.

Current Trends in the Management of Hiatal Hernia: A Literature Review of 10 Years of Data

Hiatal hernia (HH) is commonly detected during endoscopic examinations and is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease. In recent years, there have been significant advancements in diagnosing and treating HH. Surgical techniques for HH repair include open surgery, various laparoscopic procedures, transoral incisionless fundoplication, and magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA). Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is often considered the standard for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease-related HH due to its effectiveness. Other procedures, such as Toupet and Dor fundoplications, may be suited for patients with specific conditions, such as impaired esophageal motility. Newer approaches, including the MSA system and mesh repair, focus on patient-specific treatments to achieve the best outcomes. This review synthesizes the literature from 2014 to 2024 to provide an overview of current trends in HH management.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs have yielded conflicting results. We sought to analyze early postoperative complications between these approaches using a newly available NSQIP variable indicating robot use.

METHODS

We queried the 2022 ACS NSQIP database for adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare cohort characteristics. Logistic, linear, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare perioperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups.

RESULTS

We identified 4345 patients who underwent repair using a laparoscopic (2778 patients; 63.9%) or robotic (1567 patients; 36.1%) approach. Most (73.1%) were female, and the median age was 65 (IQR 55, 73). Patients who underwent robotic repair were younger (median age 64 vs 66), had a slightly higher body mass index (BMI; median 30.2 vs 29.9), and were more likely to have hypertension (53.0% vs 48.5%), all p < 0.01. On unadjusted analysis the robotic approach was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 0.4%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and hypertension, the robotic approach was not associated with increased major complications (5.6% vs 5.1%, AOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.86, 1.49), minor complications (0.9% vs 1.5%, AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74, 1.93), or unplanned readmission (6.5% vs 5.5%, AHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89, 1.54), all p ≥ 0.26. After adjusting for age and hypertension, the robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (AOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01, 6.33, p = 0.048) and pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17, 6.49, p = 0.02), although none resulted in 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs had similar overall complication and readmission rates. The robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism but no 30-day mortality. Current data support the use of both robotic and laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair.

Does crural repair with biosynthetic mesh improve outcomes of revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia (HH) is technically demanding. Re-recurrences are common and esophageal hiatus mesh reinforcement might improve durability of the repair, thus minimizing the risk of re-herniation.

PURPOSE

Assess safety and effectiveness of simple suture repair (no mesh group) vs. crural augmentation with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (mesh group) in patients with recurrent HH.

METHODS

Observational retrospective study from September 2012 to December 2022. Only patients undergoing redo surgery for previous failures of hiatal hernia repair were enrolled. Surgical failure was defined as symptomatic recurrent HH with > 2 cm of gastric tissue above the diaphragmatic impression at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and/or swallow study. Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires were used to assess and preoperative and postoperative symptoms and quality of life.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients were included. Overall, 60 patients (57.7%) underwent mesh-reinforced cruroplasty, whereas 44 (42.3%) underwent simple suture cruroplasty. Mesh and no mesh groups had similar baseline demographics, symptoms, prevalence of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus, and HH size. A composite crural repair was most commonly performed in the mesh group (38.3% vs. 20.5%; p = 0.07). In addition to cruroplasty, most patients (91%) underwent a Toupet fundoplication. The 90-day postoperative complication rate was 8.6%, and there was no mortality. Recurrent HH was diagnosed in 21 patients (20.2%) with a clinical trend toward reduced incidence in the mesh group (16.7% vs. 25%; p = 0.06). Compared to baseline, there was a statistically significant improvement of median GERD-HRQL score (p < 0.01) and all SF-36 items (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic revisional surgery for recurrent HH is safe and effective. Selective use of biosynthetic mesh may protect from early recurrence and has the potential to reduce re-herniation in the long-term.

Fundoplication vs. gastric fixation for the management of emergency hiatal hernia repairs: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of literature comparing safety outcomes between formal fundoplication and gastric fixation procedures for hiatal hernia repairs, especially in the emergency setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate 30-day clinical outcomes between fundoplication and gastric fixation performed in emergency hiatal hernia repairs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. The study population was determined using ICD9/10 codes describing diaphragmatic hernia without obstruction or gangrene, with obstruction, and with gangrene. Elective cases were excluded. CPT codes were used to group fundoplication procedures and gastric fixation procedures. The primary outcome was the 30-day complication rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, reoperation and mortality rates. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for clinically relevant confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 971 and 346 were in the fundoplication and gastric fixation groups, respectively. Fundoplication was associated with a significantly lower (p < 0.05) 30-day complication, reoperation and mortality rates. There was no statistically significant difference with respect to readmission. After adjustment, fundoplication was significantly associated with a decrease in odds of 30-day complications (OR 0.53, p < 0.001 95% CI 0.40-0.71) and mortality (OR 0.55, p = 0.033 95% CI 0.32-0.95). However, there was no significant difference with respect to 30-day readmission (OR 0.86, p = 0.449 95% CI 0.59-1.27) and reoperation (OR 0.66, p = 0.063 95% CI 0.42-1.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients with hiatal hernias that underwent emergent repair with fundoplication had a significantly lower 30-day complication and mortality rates compared to those who underwent gastric fixation procedures. Fundoplication is a safe and feasible approach to manage hiatal hernias in the emergency setting for select patients.

A Rare Transverse Colon Hiatal Herniation as a Complication of an Esophagectomy

Hiatal herniations involving the transverse colon are a rare condition. This case study explores the hiatal herniation of the transverse colon as a complication of an esophagectomy through the prosection findings of a 91-year-old male anatomical donor ("donor") who had a documented esophagectomy procedure due to esophageal adenocarcinoma. A thorough dissection of the abdomen and thorax confirmed that a large portion of the esophagus was removed during an esophagectomy, and the remaining cervical portion was reconnected to the stomach in the posterior mediastinum of the thoracic cavity. A type IV hiatal hernia involving the transverse colon and greater omentum was also noted. This study aims to evaluate the donor's noted esophageal hiatal herniations and how surrounding atypical anatomy may be correlated with the history of a completed esophagectomy.

Utility of falciform ligament flap for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Surgical repair of hiatal hernia (HH) is plagued by high recurrence rates. Hiatoplasty failure has been identified as a major determinant of recurrent symptoms and HH, but there is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach to minimize this complication and hiatal mesh reinforcement remains controversial. The use of the falciform ligament as an autologous rotational flap to support crural repair has been proposed as a potential solution. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the falciform ligament flap (FLF) as an adjunct in HH repair.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Searches were conducted on Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane through May 2024. The primary study outcome was HH recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality rate, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twelve studies comprising 469 patients undergoing FLF augmentation during primary or revisional HH repair were included. The majority (80.7%) of patients had HH types III-IV. Crural suture hiatoplasty was performed in all cases, and adjunctive mesh reinforcement was reported in two studies. Postoperative morbidity was 4.6%, and there was no mortality. The overall HH recurrence rate was 5.8% (range 0-15.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study seems to suggest that FLF may reduce postoperative HH recurrence. Well designed and comparative studies with long-term follow-up are required to confirm these preliminary data.

Diaphragmatic and pericardial reconstruction using a Gore-Tex® patch in a patient with an invasive liver malignancy

The Gore-Tex® polytetrafluoroethylene patch is one of the most used prostheses for diaphragm, vessel, and pericardial reconstruction. It is strong, flexible, and relatively inexpensive and can be fitted to match the size of the resected area. In addition, it can be used to reconstruct the pericardium and diaphragm following resection to treat diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma or repair large hiatal hernias. However, the use of polytetrafluoroethylene for hepatocellular carcinoma with diaphragmatic and pericardial invasion has not yet been reported. We report the case of a 72-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma with diaphragmatic and pericardial invasion. Subsequently, laparotomic liver subsegmentectomy of segment 3 and resection of the diaphragm and pericardium were performed. The defects were successfully reconstructed using the polytetrafluoroethylene patch, without postoperative complications. This is the first report describing a case of invasive liver malignancy that required simultaneous diaphragmatic and pericardial reconstruction using a polytetrafluoroethylene patch, indicating that the polytetrafluoroethylene patch could effectively and directly treat invasive liver malignancies.

Comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic techniques in hiatal hernia and crural repair: a review of current evidence and outcomes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate the implementation of robotic surgery in hiatal hernia and crural repair, based on the existing literature and to compare this approach to other established techniques.

METHODS

We performed a non- systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE on February 25, 2024 for papers published to date focusing on the surgical repair of hiatal hernias using the robotic platform. After eliminating publications based on eligibility criteria, 13 studies were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Robotic surgery is increasingly utilized in hiatal hernia repair due to its enhanced ergonomics and superior visualization capabilities. Operative times vary, with some studies indicating longer durations for robotic surgery (e.g., Giovannetti et al. demonstrated median operative time of 196 min for robotic compared to 145 min for laparoscopic) while others report shorter times (e.g., Lang F et al. demonstrated 88 min for robotic versus 102 min for laparoscopic). Recurrence rates between robotic and laparoscopic repairs are comparable, with reported recurrence rates of 1.8% for robotic and 1.2% for laparoscopic approaches by Benedix et al. Robotic surgery offers potential advantages, including reduced intraoperative blood loss (e.g., Giovannetti et al. mentioned median blood loss of 20 ml for robotic versus 50 ml for laparoscopic). The length of hospital stay and postoperative complication rates also vary, with some studies suggesting shorter stays and fewer complications for robotic surgery as surgeons become more proficient. Soliman et al. reported a statistically significant reduction in complication rates with robotic surgery (6.3% versus 19.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic surgery presents promising results regarding the length of hospital stay, conversion rate to open surgery and postoperative complication rates when compared to laparoscopy based on the existing literature. Despite the lack of striking differences, robotic hiatal hernia repair is a valid and evolving approach.

SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common condition. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions regarding the treatment of HH.

METHODS

Systematic reviews were conducted for four key questions regarding the treatment of HH in adults: surgical treatment of asymptomatic HH versus surveillance; use of mesh versus no mesh; performing a fundoplication versus no fundoplication; and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus redo fundoplication for recurrent HH. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology by subject experts. When the evidence was insufficient to base recommendations on, expert opinion was utilized instead. Recommendations for future research were also proposed.

RESULTS

The panel provided one conditional recommendation and two expert opinions for adults with HH. The panel suggested routinely performing a fundoplication in the repair of HH, though this was based on low certainty evidence. There was insufficient evidence to make evidence-based recommendations regarding surgical repair of asymptomatic HH or conversion to RYGB in recurrent HH, and therefore, only expert opinions were offered. The panel suggested that select asymptomatic patients may be offered surgical repair, with criteria outlined. Similarly, it suggested that conversion to RYGB for management of recurrent HH may be appropriate in certain patients and again described criteria. The evidence for the routine use of mesh in HH repair was equivocal and the panel deferred making a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should provide guidance regarding surgical decision-making in the treatment of HH and highlight the importance of shared decision-making and consideration of patient values to optimize outcomes. Pursuing the identified research needs will improve the evidence base and may allow for stronger recommendations in future evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of HH.

Optimizing outcomes in paraesophageal hernia repair: a novel critical view

BACKGROUND

The recurrence rate of paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) is high with reported rates of recurrence varying between 25 and 42%. We present a novel approach to PEHR that involves the visualization of a critical view to decrease recurrence rate. Our study aims to investigate the outcomes of PEHR following the implementation of a critical view.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective study that examines operative outcomes in patients who underwent PEHR with a critical view in comparison to patients who underwent standard repair. The critical view is defined as full dissection of the posterior mediastinum with complete mobilization of the esophagus to the level of the inferior pulmonary vein, visualization of the left crus of the diaphragm as well as the left gastric artery while the distal esophagus is retracted to expose the spleen in the background. Bivariate chi-squared analysis and multivariable logistic and linear regressions were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 297 patients underwent PEHR between 2015 and 2023, including 207 with critical view and 90 with standard repair which represents the historic control. Type III hernias were most common (48%) followed by type I (36%), type IV (13%), and type II (2.0%). Robotic-assisted repair was most common (65%), followed by laparoscopic (22%) and open repair (14%). Fundoplications performed included Dor (59%), Nissen (14%), Belsey (5%), and Toupet (2%). Patients who underwent PEHR with critical view had lower hernia recurrence rates compared to standard (9.7% vs 20%, P < .01) and lower reoperation rates (0.5% vs 10%, P < .001). There were no differences in postoperative complications on unadjusted bivariate analysis; however, adjusted outcomes revealed a lower odds of postoperative complications in patients with critical view (AOR .13, 95% CI .05-.31, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We present dissection of a novel critical view during repair of all types of paraesophageal hernia that results in reproducible, consistent, and durable postoperative outcomes, including a significant reduction in recurrence and reoperation.

The role of anterior gastropexy in elderly Japanese hiatal hernia patients

PURPOSE

As Japanese society ages, the number of surgeries performed in elderly patients with hiatal hernia (HH) is increasing. In this study, we examined the feasibility, safety, and potential effectiveness of the addition of anterior gastropexy to hiatoplasty with or without mesh repair and/or fundoplication in elderly Japanese HH patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent laparoscopic HH repair between 2010 and 2021. We divided them into 2 groups according to age: the "younger" group (< 75 years old, n = 21), and the "older" group (≥ 75 years old, n = 18). The patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative results were collected.

RESULTS

The median ages were 68 and 82 years old in the younger and older groups, respectively, and the female ratio was similar between the groups (younger vs. older: 67% vs. 78%, p = 0.44). The older group had more type III/IV HH cases than the younger group (19% vs. 83%, p < 0.001). The operation time was longer in the older group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in blood loss, perioperative complications, or postoperative length of stay between the groups. The older group had significantly more cases of anterior gastropexy (0% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) and less fundoplication (100% vs. 67%, p = 0.004) than the younger group. There was no significant difference in HH recurrence between the groups (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of anterior gastropexy to other procedures is feasible, safe, and potentially effective in elderly Japanese patients with HH.

Morbidity and mortality following hiatal hernia repair in geriatric patients: a multicenter research network study

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia is a common surgical pathology. Such hernias can be found incidentally and patients may opt for an initial nonoperative approach though many will pursue surgery after symptom progression. Data on the effects of age on the outcomes of hiatal hernia repair may help inform this decision-making process.

METHODS

The TriNetX database was queried for all adult patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair from 2000 to 2023. Patients were divided into elective and emergent cohorts on the basis of diagnosis codes indicating obstruction or gangrene. Patients aged 80-89 were compared against those aged 65-79 in unadjusted analysis. Logistic regression models controlling for additional health history covariates were created to calculate odds ratios for primary outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 2310 octogenarians and 15,295 seniors who underwent elective hiatal hernia repair, and 406 octogenarians and 1462 seniors who underwent emergent repair during the study period. The vast majority of patients in both groups underwent minimally invasive operations. In the elective cohort, octogenarians had higher rates of mortality, malnutrition, sepsis, respiratory failure, pneumonia, DVT, blood transfusion, and discharge to nursing facility. In the emergent cohort, octogenarians had higher rates of mortality, malnutrition, sepsis, and respiratory failure. The odds ratios for mortality in the elective and emergent cohorts were 3.9 (95% CI 3.1-5.0) and 3.5 (95% CI 2.1-5.6), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians are at a meaningfully increased risk for mortality and morbidity after both elective and emergent hiatal hernia repair compared to senior-aged patients. Greater consideration should be given to surgical repair prior to the 8th decade of life.

Hiatal Hernia With Ulcer at the Gastroesophageal Junction Presenting With Progressive Dysphagia and Epigastric Pain: A Case Report

A hiatal hernia occurs when the contents of the abdominal cavity, most often the stomach, protrude into the chest cavity through the esophageal hiatus. The hiatus is an elliptical-shaped outlet, typically formed by parts of the right diaphragmatic crus surrounding the distal esophagus. This ailment can transpire due to either the broadening of the specific diaphragmatic opening or a shortening in the overall length of the esophagus, leading to herniation of the stomach into the thoracic region. Raised pressure in the abdominal region may also be one of the culprits. Patients with a hiatal hernia usually remain asymptomatic, but patients might have difficulty swallowing both liquids and solids in the advanced stages of the disease. The disease is rarely accompanied by reflux of gastric acid into the esophagus due to decreased activity of the lower esophageal sphincter, leading to increased complaints of epigastric pain and ulceration near the gastroesophageal junction. Long-standing cases can increase the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia, which may advance to esophageal carcinoma in later stages. Advanced age and obesity are significant risk factors for hiatal hernia. Obese individuals, in particular, experience higher intra-abdominal pressure, which significantly raises the likelihood of developing a hiatal hernia. The hernia may be diagnosed through an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or radiologically through a chest X-ray in the posterior-anterior view, defining the border of the esophagus. Hence, this facilitates a more seamless and precise diagnosis. Surgical fundoplication treatment improves the patient's condition better than solitary medical management. Overall, addressing the condition surgically often yields more favorable outcomes and enhances the patient's quality of life. Hiatal hernia usually presents with no or minimal clinical manifestations. Thus, this case report highlights the importance of comprehensive clinical management of such cases.

Robotic Repair of a Paraesophageal Hernia After an Open Nissen Fundoplication: Case Presentation and Clinical Discussion

We present a female in her sixties with a recurrent paraesophageal hernia status post open Nissen fundoplication and multiple esophageal dilations who underwent a robotic paraesophageal hernia repair, with extensive lysis of adhesions. The stomach and esophagus were dissected off the crura and the previous wrap was undone. Once the entirety of the stomach and esophagus were freed from their surrounding structures, the hernia sac was able to be excised. The crural defect was closed and gastropexy was performed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home. This case is presented to provide evidence that robotic repair presents a viable option in the reoperation of patients following an open Nissen fundoplication as well as provide an overview of the types of hiatal hernias and the indications and options for surgical intervention.

Giant diaphragmatic hernia surgical treatment by laparoscopic repair: a case report

Diaphragmatic hernias occur in up to 10%-50% of the general population. Treatment of hiatal hernias depends on the type of hernia and the severity of the symptoms. We report the case of a 52-year-old woman with no significant history who presented for 1 year with non-specific chest pain, dyspnea, dysphagia, and heartburn. A thoracoabdominal tomography with contrast was performed, showing a diaphragmatic hernia containing the stomach, portions of the duodenum, pancreas, small intestine, and colon with a sac of up to 20 cm, which was successfully repaired laparoscopically.

Paraesophageal hernia recurrence following repair: making the case for reoperative surgery in a propensity-matched cohort

BACKGROUND

Paraesophageal hernia repairs (PEHRs) have high rates of radiographic recurrence, with some patients requiring repeat operation. This study characterizes patients who underwent PEHR to identify the factors associated with postoperative symptom improvement and radiographic recurrence. We furthermore use propensity score matching to compare patients undergoing initial and reoperative PEHR to identify the factors predictive of recurrence or need for reoperation.

METHODS

After IRB approval, patients who underwent PEHR at a tertiary care center between January 2018 and December 2022 were identified. Patient characteristics, preoperative imaging, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. A computational generalization of inverse propensity score weight was then used to construct populations of initial and redo PEHR patients with similar covariate distributions.

RESULTS

A total of 244 patients underwent PEHR (78.7% female, mean age 65.4 ± 12.3 years). Most repairs were performed with crural closure (81.4%) and fundoplication (71.7%) with 14.2% utilizing mesh. Postoperatively, 76.5% of patients had subjective symptom improvement and of 157 patients with postoperative imaging, 52.9% had evidence of radiographic recurrence at a mean follow-up of 10.4 ± 13.6 months. Only 4.9% of patients required a redo operation. Hernia type, crural closure, fundoplication, and mesh usage were not predictors of radiographic recurrence or symptom improvement (P > 0.05). Propensity weight score analysis of 50 redo PEHRs compared to a matched cohort of 194 initial operations revealed lower rates of postoperative symptom improvement (P < 0.05) but no differences in need for revision, complication rates, ED visits, or readmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Most PEHR patients have symptomatic improvement with minimal complications and reoperations despite frequent radiographic recurrence. Hernia type, crural closure, fundoplication, and mesh usage were not significantly associated with recurrence or symptom improvement. Compared to initial PEHR, reoperative PEHRs had lower rates of symptom improvement but similar rates of recurrence, complications, and need for reoperation.

Management of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of hiatal hernia remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of mesh versus no mesh and fundoplication versus no fundoplication in symptomatic patients; surgery versus observation in asymptomatic patients; and redo hernia repair versus conversion to Roux-en-Y reconstruction in recurrent hiatal hernia.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases between 2000 and 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and case series (asymptomatic and recurrent hernias). Screening was performed by two trained independent reviewers. Pooled analyses were performed on comparative data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale for randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 45 studies from 5152 retrieved records. Only six RCTs had low risk of bias. Mesh was associated with a lower recurrence risk (RR = 0.50, 95%CI 0.28, 0.88; I2 = 57%) in observational studies but not RCTs (RR = 0.98, 95%CI 0.47, 2.02; I2 = 34%), and higher total early dysphagia based on five observational studies (RR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.10, 1.89; I2 = 40%) but was not statistically significant in RCTs (RR = 3.00, 95%CI 0.64, 14.16). There was no difference in complications, reintervention, heartburn, reflux, or quality of life. There were no appropriate studies comparing surgery to observation in asymptomatic patients. Fundoplication resulted in higher early dysphagia in both observational studies and RCTs ([RR = 2.08, 95%CI 1.16, 3.76] and [RR = 20.58, 95%CI 1.34, 316.69]) but lower reflux in RCTs (RR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17, 0.56, I2 = 0%). Conversion to Roux-en-Y was associated with a lower reintervention risk after 30 days compared to redo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for optimal management of symptomatic and recurrent hiatal hernia remains controversial, underpinned by studies with a high risk of bias. Shared decision making between surgeon and patient is essential for optimal outcomes.