Laparoscopic partial splenectomy: a technical tip

Ten-year experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for patients with splenic benign lesions

BACKGROUND

The increasing comprehension of spleen function has led to the gradual endorsement of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) as a treatment option for benign spleen lesions. However, it is important to note that the LPS technique remains challenging. This study explores the standardized process and surgical techniques in LPS, aiming to promote the application of this technique.

METHODS

The clinical data of 20 patients with benign cystic or solid spleen lesions who underwent LPS at Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University were retrospectively collected. Data include age, gender, imaging data, surgical process, and postoperative complications. Additionally, the surgical techniques and standardization process were recorded in detail.

RESULTS

All 20 cases completed LPS without conversion to laparotomy or splenectomy. The surgical time was 162.25 ± 37.96 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 93.00 ± 58.40 mL, no blood products were transfused during the operations, and the removed volume of the spleen was about 34.75 ± 12.19 %. There were no postoperative complications such as intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, pancreatic fistula, and residual splenic infarction. Postoperative pleural effusion occurred in four cases, and symptoms improved after symptomatic treatment. The postoperative hospital stay was 7.0 ± 1.4 days. There were no perioperative deaths. The residual splenic vessels were normal during the follow-up period, and no vascular embolism occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

LPS is a safe, feasible, and effective surgical method for patients with benign cystic or solid spleen lesions. Subsequently, mastering related surgical techniques and standardized surgical procedures can control the surgical risks in suitable cases, making LPS the standard procedure for treating benign spleen diseases.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for a giant splenic pseudocyst with elevated CA19-9: a case report

Introduction and importance

Currently, there is a lack of reliable evidence on the management of splenic cysts, which are rare. Exploring the efficacy of laparoscopic partial splenectomy can aid in the accumulation of treatment-related evidence.

Case presentation

Here, we report the case of a 31-year-old female who was diagnosed with a giant splenic cyst with elevated serum CA19-9 and subsequently underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy.

Clinical discussion

The effects of most treatment options for splenic cysts, including percutaneous aspiration and drainage, fenestration, and partial splenectomy, have not been confirmed by high-level evidence. With the development of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic partial splenectomy has drawn increasing attention. Additionally, the relationships between tumor markers and splenic cysts need to be further elucidated.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy might be recommended for patients with splenic cysts, especially when the cysts are not completely covered by the splenic parenchyma.

Clinical effect of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for both benign tumours and trauma-10 years of experience at a single institution

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to present our surgical experience in patients with benign tumour or trauma in spleen who underwent laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) and to compare the results with those of patients who underwent an open partial splenectomy (OPS).

METHODS

We analysed the medical data of patients who underwent LPS or OPS between January 2010 and January 2020.

RESULTS

In total, 41 patients were enrolled. Nine patients underwent open surgery, 32 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The proportion of patients with tumours in the upper pole in LPS group was more than patients in OPS group. No difference was observed in estimated blood loss, allogeneic transfusion, postoperative stay, pathology and complications between LPS and OPS groups. The operation time in the LPS group (137.5 ± 30.8 min) was longer than that in the OPS group (88.3 ± 30.1 min) for patients with splenic traumatic rupture (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

LPS is an effective and safe spleen-preserving surgery as OPS. The advantages are small trauma, light pain and quick recovery. It is suitable for patients with benign tumours or trauma confined to one side of the spleen.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Critical Appraisal of an Emerging Technique. A Review of the First 457 Published Cases

Background: Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) may allow avoiding total splenectomy (TS) complications and maximizing the advantages of mini-invasive approach. The objective of this review is to assess feasibility and safety of LPS, to compare this approach with alternative options. Materials and Methods: A literature review of articles reporting LPS is performed. Several parameters, including age, indication, surgical technique, devices used for splenic section/hemostasis, adverse outcomes, including morbidity/mortality, conversions to open surgery, conversions to TS, operative time (OT), and hospital stay (HS), are analyzed. Articles comparing LPS' results with those of open partial splenectomy and laparoscopic TS are also analyzed. Results: Fifty-nine articles reporting 457 LPS were included. Patients' characteristics varied widely, concerning age and indications, including hematological disease (hereditary spherocytosis, drepanocytosis), splenic focal masses, and trauma. Several technical options are reported. Mean OT and HS are 128 ± 43.7 minutes and 4.9 ± 3.8 days, respectively. No mortality and 5.7% morbidity are reported. Conversion rates to open surgery and to TS are 3.9% and 3.7%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion LPS is feasible and safe, with no mortality, low morbidity, and low conversion rates to laparotomy and to TS. LPS may be accomplished by various techniques and tools. Major complications are sporadically reported, thus potential risks should not be underestimated.

Laparoscopic near-total splenectomy. Report of a case

•

We describe a case report of near total splenectomy managed by laparoscopy for a large lesion of the upper pole of the spleen.

•

When total splenectomy is performed, an increased risk of potentially lethal infections arises. Asplenia and impaired splenic function are related to the increase of morbidity and mortality from infectious complications.

•

The overwhelming post splenectomy infections (OPSI) are mostly represented by fulminating sepsis, meningitis or pneumonia.

•

laparoscopic near total splenectomy is an innovative partial splenectomy technique consisting on preserving a residual spleen volume.

•

The comparison between other spleen preserving techniques shows that LNTS is associated with a lower rate of secondary surgery and postoperative recurrence of anaemia.

Introduction

Splenectomy is a surgical procedure indicated for the treatment of most benign and malignant splenic diseases, especially hematologic disorders. Laparoscopic approach is preferable to the open surgery for most indications because it reduces intra- and post-operative complications and shortens hospital stay. Laparoscopic approach is also feasible for partial splenectomy. Spleen-preserving techniques reduce the risk of severe infections and thromboembolic events that can occur after total splenectomy

Case presentation

We report a case of a 50-year old woman with an incidentally discovered voluminous lesion in the superior pole of spleen. A laparoscopic near-total splenectomy was performed.

Discussion

The evidence about the potential complications in splenectomised patients speaks in favour of performing spleen-sparing surgical techniques whenever possible. Most common indications for laparoscopic partial splenectomy are non-parasitic splenic cystic, benign splenic tumors, splenic haematological diseases, non-cystic intraparenchymal lesions, spleen rupture, splenic abscess, vascular abnormalities. Laparoscopic near total splenectomy is an innovative partial splenectomy technique consisting on preserving a residual spleen volume.

Conclusion

LNTS seems to be a safe and effective technique for the management of benign spleen diseases. The comparison between other spleen preserving techniques shows that LNTS is associated with a lower rate of secondary surgery and postoperative recurrence of anaemia.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy for splenic lymphangioma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Lymphangioma is a benign malformation of the lymphatic system and is often found in the neck and axilla, the orbit, the mediastinum, etc. However, isolated splenic lymphangioma is a rare disease in young women, and its treatment is controversial. We report a case of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for isolated splenic lymphangioma in a young woman.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 18-year-old woman with mild epigastralgia was admitted to a nearby hospital. Abdominal ultrasound detected a 6-cm mass confined to the upper pole of the spleen; thereafter, she was referred to our department for surgical treatment. Although a benign tumor, we decided to resect it because of her symptoms. To preserve part of the normal spleen, laparoscopic partial splenectomy was performed with a co-axial approach using four ports and a liver retractor in the lithotomy position. After dissection around the spleen hilum, we identified that the tumor was being fed from the splenic vessels of the upper pole and severed the branch. Postoperatively, the patient showed no complications and was discharged on postoperative day 8 without symptoms. Pathological examination revealed splenic lymphangioma, which is rare in young women. No recurrence was seen 1 year after surgery, and a computed tomography scan showed no problems with the remaining spleen.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience of laparoscopic partial splenectomy for a young woman with an isolated splenic lymphangioma, we determined that laparoscopic partial splenectomy is a safe, effective, and valuable option for the treatment of benign splenic tumors.

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery in fifty-one cases: experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) for splenic benign space-occupying lesions has been reported by many researchers; however, few studies have described methods to control intraoperative bleeding. Trustworthy experience in LPS with a satisfactory intraoperative hemorrhage control technique is therefore necessary. The current study aims to present our experience in LPS with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery for controlling intraoperative bleeding with a large sample of 51 cases and to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and reproducibility of this technique.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients from August 2014 to April 2019 who underwent LPS in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical techniques were described in detail.

RESULTS

All patients had successfully undergone LPS with temporary occlusion of the trunk of the splenic artery. Conversions to open surgery, hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomies, or blood transfusions were not needed. The operative time was 94.75 ± 18.91 min, the estimated blood loss was 71.13 ± 53.87 ml, and the volume of resected spleen was 34.75 ± 12.19%. The range of postoperative stays was 4-14 days. One female patient (2%, 1/51) suffered from postoperative complications. No perioperative mortality, incision infections, postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs), splenic infarctions, or portal/splenic vein thromboembolic events occurred.

CONCLUSION

LPS is an effective spleen-preserving surgery. Although there are many other bleeding control methods, temporarily occluding the trunk of the splenic artery was found to be a safe, feasible, and reproducible technique in LPS. The outcomes of this technique and the efficacy of splenic parenchyma preservation are acceptable.

Partial splenectomy: Who, when and how. A systematic review of the 2130 published cases

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

In order to avoid consequences of total splenectomy (including severe postsplenectomy sepsis), partial splenectomy (PS) is increasingly reported. Without guidelines and indications concerning a rarely-indicated procedure, a review of literature should be an asset.

METHODS

A systematic review of all PSs from 1960 to December 2017 was performed, with special focus on surgical indications, sites of resection, approaches and techniques of vascular dissection and parenchymal section/hemostasis of the spleen, perioperative morbidity/mortality, including complications compelling to perform total splenectomy.

RESULTS

Among 2130 PSs, indications for resection were hematological disease in 1013 cases and nonhematological conditions in 1078, including various tumors in 142 and trauma in 184. Parenchymal transection was performed using several techniques through the years, most frequently after having induced partial ischemia by splenic hilum vascular dissection/ligation. 371 laparoscopic/robotic PSs were reported. Rescue total splenectomy was required in 75 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although good results are probably overestimated by such a retrospective review, PS should be considered as a procedure associated with a low morbidity/mortality. Nevertheless, severe complications are also reported, and the need of total splenectomy should not to be minimized. Laparoscopic/robotic procedures are increasingly performed, with good results and rare conversions.

TYPE OF STUDY

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) is a challenging procedure. The aim of this review was to evaluate its feasibility, safety, and potential benefits.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review for the years 1995-2018 to retrieve all relevant articles.

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies with 252 patients undergoing LPS were reviewed. Six studies described combined operations. Ranges of operative time and estimated blood loss were 50-225 min and 0-1200 ml, respectively. There are eight patients need blood transfusion in 231 patients with available data. The conversion rate was 3.6% (9/252). Overall, 27 patients (10.7%;27/252) developed postoperative or intraoperative complications. Overall mortality was 0% (0/252). The length of postoperative stay (POS) varied (1-11 days). Among four comparative studies, one showed LPS could reduce POS than laparoscopic total splenectomy (LTS) (LTS 5.4 ± 1.8 days, LPS 4.2 ± 0.8 days, p = 0.027) and complications (pleural effusion (LTS 9/22, LPS 0/15, p = 0.005), splenic vein thrombosis (LTS 10/22, LPS 0/15, p = 0.002)). Another comparative study showed LPS may benefit emergency patients. However, one comparative study showed LPS was associated with more pain, longer time to oral intake, and longer POS in children with hereditary spherocytosis. The fourth comparative study showed robotic subtotal splenectomy was comparable to laparoscopy in terms of POS and complication. The main benefits were lower blood loss, vascular dissection time, and a better evaluation of splenic remnant volume.

CONCLUSIONS

In early series of highly selected patients, LPS appears to be feasible and safe when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Safe and Feasible Treatment for Splenic Benign Lesions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic partial splenectomy in treating splenic benign lesions (SBL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 16 SBL patients clearly diagnosed before surgery (8 cases of splenic cysts, 5 cases of splenic lymphangioma, and 3 cases of splenic hemangioma) underwent 2D or 3D laparoscopic partial splenectomy from October 2013 to August 2016. The diameters of the SBL were 5 to 17 cm with an average of 8.7 cm; 12 cases were located in the upper pole of the spleen, and 4 cases were located in the lower pole of the spleen.

RESULTS

All 16 patients successfully completed laparoscopic partial splenectomy, and no patients required conversion to an open operation. There were 3 cases of resection using the 3D laparoscope. There were 14 cases of resection of half of the spleen and 2 cases of partial resection of the lower spleen. The operation time was 110 to 195 minutes with an average time of 157 minutes. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was 80 to 200 mL, and no patients required blood transfusion. The postoperative abdominal drainage time was 3 to 5 days, and no abdominal bleeding, pancreatic leakage, subphrenic infection, or other complications occurred; the postoperative hospital stay lasted 5 to 6 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic partial splenectomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of splenic benign lesions.

The role of splenectomy in lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis (AS)

The extensive performance of splenectomy worldwide for patients suffered from splenic trauma has given rise to high risks of postoperative complications, which has been attracting increasing attention in recent years. Nowadays the spleen is regarded as a versatile organ of the human body, invested with various excellent properties. The spleen has been recognized to take a great part in lipid metabolism. While removal of the spleen intends to alter lipid values, especially with an elevated LDL, splenic autotransplantation is able to normalize these lipid alterations. What is more, conservative surgical procedures like subtotal or partial splenectomy, could as well, afford a correction of dyslipidemia. At the same time, clinically, splenectomy demonstrates a high rate of atherosclerosis (AS), whereas non-surgical treatment after splenic trauma shows unchanged propagation of AS. Based on the intimate relationship between serum lipids and AS, the lipid changes modulated by splenectomy are believed to be responsible for the development of AS. Therefore, a "splenic factor" is most likely present in the regulation of lipidation and AS. Several theories have been postulated to elucidate the possible mechanism involved, among which most are primarily based on its forceful natural immune function, that is to say, the mononuclear phagocytic system.However, the accurate mechanisms behind this mysterious phenomenon still remain unclear so far. Of importance, lipid fractions should be monitored consecutively in case of inevitable splenectomy.

Partial splenectomy: A case series and systematic review of the literature

Backgrounds/Aims

Partial splenectomy (PS) is a surgical option for splenic mass, in order to reduce postoperative complications and preserve the splenic function. Despite this, data in literature is still scarce. The present study aimed to reveal our recent experience and provide a comprehensive overview of the feasibility and complications related to various surgical approaches.

Methods

Data of patients who underwent PS, between 2014 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Literature was searched for studies reporting all types of PS in adult or adolescent patients.

Results

Five PS were performed in our department: two (40%) by laparoscopy and three (60%) by laparotomy. Two (40%) postoperative complications were detected, and in one of them, total splenectomy (TS) by laparotomy was finally required. There were no deaths or complications at last follow-up. Twenty studies including 213 patients were identified in the literature search. The rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 3% (range, 5–50%) and in 3% of cases (range, 7–10%) PS was converted into total TS and the overall morbidity rate was 8% (range, 5–25%). In comparison to laparotomy, the conversion rate of laparoscopic approach to TS was 3.5% (vs. 1.4%) and a morbidity rate of 9.8% (vs. 4.3%).

Conclusions

The present review shows that PS is a viable procedure in selected cases. The mini-invasive approach seemed to be feasible despite the presence of higher rate of complications than the open technique. In future, further studies on this topic are needed by involving more patients. Furthermore, it is proposed that the development of robotic surgery could make this approach the new gold-standard technique for spleen-preserving surgery.

Feasibility and safety of emergency laparoscopic partial splenectomy: A retrospective analysis

The increased awareness of asplenia-related life-threatening complications has led to the development of parenchyma sparing splenic resections in past few years. The aim of this study is to retrospectively analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) in selected emergency patients.From January 2013 to December 2015, there were 46 emergency patients, diagnosed with splenic rupture, admitted in our department. Selection criteria for LPS: (1) Preoperative CT scan revealed single pole rupture without spleen pedicle injury; (2) BP>90/60 mm Hg and heart rates <120 bpm; (3) No sigh of multiple organ injury. Eventually, LPS was performed in 21 patients (Group LPS), while laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) was performed in 20 patients (Group LS).The main cause of splenic rupture was traffic accident, followed by blunt injury and high falling injury. Abdominal CT scan showed the mean longitudinal diameter of spleen of group LPS was 14.2 ± 1.8 cm (range 12-17 cm), while the size of remnant spleen was 5.5 ± 1.2 cm. Between 2 groups, operation time (LPS: 122.6 ± 17.2 min vs LS: 110.5 ± 18.7 minutes, P = .117), and intraoperative blood loss (LPS: 174 ± 22 mL vs LS: 169 ± 29 mL, P = .331) were similar. There were 2 patients suffered subsequent unstable vital sign altering during mobilization when performing LPS. Conversion to LS (2/21, 9.52%) was decided and successfully completed. Although there was no patient suffered postoperative OPSI or thrombocytosis events in both groups after 6-month follow-up, the mean platelets and leukocyte count were significantly lower in group LPS. Splenic regrowth was evaluated in 20 patients of group LPS. And the mean regrowth of splenic volume reached 19% (10%-26%).Due to its minimal invasive effect and functional splenic tissue preservation, LPS may be a safe and feasible approach for emergency patients. And prospective trials with clear inclusion criteria are needed to proof the benefit of LPS.

A preoperatively predictive difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: experience from a large-scale single center

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors that influence the difficulty of performing laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymph node dissection (SHLND) for gastric cancer and to establish a simple and effective scoring system to predict the surgical difficulty preoperatively.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2013, we prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 317 patients with upper- or middle-third gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic spleen-preserving SHLND. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors for surgical difficulty based on the operation time during spleen-preserving SHLND. A logistic regression model was used to identify determinant variables and construct a predictive difficulty scoring system.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that gender, body mass index (BMI), number of splenic lobar arteries (SLAs), and type of SLA were independently predictive factors of operation time. According to these factors, we developed a predictive surgical difficulty scoring system and the difficulty levels are divided into 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 points or more. Based on the relative risk, we stratified the surgical difficulty into the following three divisions: 0 low difficulty, 1-2 intermediate difficulty, and 3 points or more high difficulty. The patients with long operation time accounted for 19.6, 43.6, and 90.9 % for the three groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the logistic regression model and the simplified difficulty scoring prediction model was 0.717 and 0.715, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on four independent risk factors, including gender, BMI, number of SLAs, and type of SLA, we developed a simple and effective scoring system to predict the difficulty of laparoscopic spleen-preserving SHLND preoperatively. This novel scoring system might aid surgeons with different experience in performing operations at different levels of difficulty.

Laparoscopic Partial Splenectomy: A Preferred Method for Select Patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic partial splenectomy (LPS) using a harmonic scalpel (HS) combined with bipolar coagulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using HS and bipolar coagulation technology, 18 patients suffering from splenic cystic neoplasm were treated with LPS between January 2010 and December 2014, and their clinical data were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

LPS was performed successfully without conversion to open surgery in all cases. The mean intra-operative blood loss was 75.8 ± 33.5 mL, and the mean operation time was 54.3 ± 16.6 minutes (range, 48-82 minutes). No cases of postoperative bleeding, infection, or pancreatic fistula occurred. No patient required total splenectomy. The mean hospital stay was 6.6 ± 3.2 days, and the median postoperative follow-up was 19.8 months (range, 5-60 months). All patients recovered successfully, with normal complete blood counts and without any recurrence on follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

LPS is a safe and feasible operation for selected patients. Combined use of an HS and bipolar coagulation can shorten the operation time, reduce blood loss, and improve the safety of the operation.

[Robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial splenectomy for nonparasitic cysts]

21 patients with nonparasitic spleen cysts were operated. Robot-assisted (RA) interventions were applied in 10 cases, laparoscopic--in 11 patients. Men surgery duration was 124 minutes in case of RA-technique and 120 minutes if laparoscopy was used. Blood loss was significantly lower in the group of RA resection (p=0.035). There were no conversions of access in the group of RA-operations while in group of laparoscopy conversion has been required in 1 case. We did not observe complications in case of RA-surgeries. Laparoscopic method was associated with 2 complications (left-sided hydrothorax and fluid accumulation in resection area). Postoperative hospital-stay did not differ in both groups and was 7.1 and 6.4 room-nights in case of RA-interventions and laparoscopy respectively. There were no deaths. Indications for robot-assisted partial splenectomy for nonparasitic cysts include location of mass in upper pole or hilus of spleen, its diameter more than 8 cm, body mass index more than 30 and splenomegaly. Lower pole resection and splenectomy are more advisable using laparoscopic method.

Spleen hydatidosis treated by hemi-splenectomy: A low-morbidity, cost-effective management by a recently improved surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Splenic hydatidosis is a rare condition and is usually managed by total splenectomy, which is associated to various complications, including overwhelming post-splenectomy sepsis and thrombosis. Probably due to supposed technical difficulties, the partial splenectomy is rarely performed being often unknown to physicians, infectious disease specialists and surgeons.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical and surgical data were collected of four consecutive patients undergoing partial (or hemi-) splenectomy using an original, recently improved technique as a treatment for polar splenic hydatid cyst. The procedure implies a selective vascular ligation, a mechanical stapler-assisted section and haemostatic agents (Surgicel(®)) application on the cutting surface. Three patients were treated by laparotomy (including one affected by both liver and spleen localizations) whereas the last one was approached laparoscopically.

RESULTS

Partial splenectomy operative time reached 74 min (range: 60-94 min) and blood loss was 8 ml (range: 5-10 ml). Hospital stay was 5.6 days (range: 5-7 days). At a mean follow-up of 20 months (range: 12-36 months), outcomes were uneventful.

CONCLUSIONS

Partial splenectomy for hydatidosis is effective and safe. Physicians and surgeons should be aware of such an easy-to-catch option when dealing with benign splenic conditions, such as parasitic cysts. Cost-effectiveness, low morbidity and the possible prevention of splenectomy-related infectious complications should plead in favor of this technique in developing countries, where hydatidosis is endemic and post-splenectomy drugs and vaccines may be lacking.