Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for large esophageal leiomyoma originating from the muscularis propria layer

Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Upper Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is an advanced endoscopic technique used for the minimally invasive removal of subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STER for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of major scholar databases (until December 15, 2023) was performed. Complete resection rate was considered the primary outcome. En bloc resection, operation duration, length of stay (LOS), local recurrence, and periprocedural complications were considered secondary outcomes. Random-effects (RE) and fixed-effects (FE) models were used to generate the outcome estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies and 3795 patients were included. Pooled proportion of complete resection was 99% (95% CI 98.4-99.6%, p < 0.001). En bloc resection was achieved at 87.7% of cases. Overall mean operation duration was 64.2 min, while mean LOS was estimated at 4.93 days. The local recurrence rate was 0.1%. The two most common complications associated with STER were subcutaneous emphysema (5.5%) and pneumothorax (3%).

CONCLUSION

STER is a highly feasible and safe treatment modality for upper GI subepithelial lesions.

Slicing Through the Options: A Systematic Review of Esophageal Leiomyoma Management

Esophageal leiomyomas are rare, benign tumors that can remain asymptomatic or cause dysphagia and chest discomfort when they grow large. Despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, optimal management remains debated. This systematic review evaluates current diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches, synthesizing findings from a comprehensive PubMed search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 51 studies were included, comprising six original studies, 26 case reports, nine retrospective cohort studies, nine case series, and two cross-sectional studies. Findings indicate that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most accurate diagnostic tool (89% accuracy), while computed tomography (CT) and barium swallow studies provide complementary structural assessments. Immunohistochemical staining differentiates leiomyomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with leiomyomas expressing desmin and smooth muscle actin (SMA) but lacking CD34 and KIT. Surgical intervention is recommended for symptomatic tumors or those exceeding 5 cm. Minimally invasive techniques, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), offer superior outcomes compared to traditional open surgery. RATS demonstrates a negligible mucosal injury rate versus 1-15% for other approaches, while STER minimizes blood loss and accelerates recovery. Postoperative outcomes are generally favorable, though transient gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common complication. While STER and RATS present effective alternatives with reduced morbidity, this review highlights limitations, including variability in study designs, small sample sizes, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize patient selection and establish long-term efficacy. This review provides insights to inform clinical practice and guide future research in the management of esophageal leiomyomas.

Coexisting achalasia and leiomyoma misdiagnosed as a submucosal tumor, successfully treated by simultaneous peroral endoscopic myotomy and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection in the same tunnel

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a safe and effective method in the treatment of achalasia. Meanwhile, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is a common endoscopic method for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMT) in the upper digestive tract. However simultaneous POEM and STER for coexisting achalasia and esophageal SMT is rarely reported. A 40-year-old woman underwent esophagoscopy after dysphagia and vomiting for 20 years. The protruding submucosal lesion with normal overlying mucosa was found in the lower part of the esophagus, nearing cardia. Considering the persistent swallowing discomfort and vomiting symptoms, the patient underwent esophageal manometry and barium esophagram, and was finally diagnosed as achalasia with esophageal submucosal tumor. Finally, POEM and STER were performed simultaneously on the patient in the same tunnel. The patient was followed up for 4 months without recurrence or complaints. We herein report a case of achalasia with esophageal leiomyoma who underwent POEM and STER in the same tunnel to remove the mass and relieve the symptoms.

Advances in Third Space Endoscopy

This article offers a detailed overview of recent advancements in third space endoscopy (TSE), highlighting key procedures and their clinical applications and outcomes. Clinical TSE started as a treatment for achalasia and was named peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Outcome data and comparative data of POEM with other treatments were detailed and discussed. This article also explores the indications and outcomes of other TSE procedures, such as G-POEM, Z-POEM, D-POEM, per-rectal endoscopic myotomy, and STER/POET. This article serves as a valuable resource for endoscopists looking to enhance their understanding and stay updated on these advanced TSE procedures.

Endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal lesions by using third space endoscopy techniques

The concept of submucosal space, or rather the "third space", located between the intact mucosal flap and the muscularis propria layer of the gastrointestinal tract, represents a tunnel that the endoscopist could use to perform interventions in the muscularis propria layer or breech it to enter the mediastinum or the peritoneal cavity without full thickness perforation. The tunnel technique can be used both for the removal of mucosal tumours, called endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD), for the removal of subepithelial tumours (SELs), called submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection (STER), and for the removal of extra-luminal lesions (for example in the mediastinum or in the rectum), called submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection for extraluminal tumours (STER-ET). Aim of this updated narrative review, is to summarize the evidences that analyses indications, and outcomes of tunnelling techniques for the treatment of above mentioned lesions.

Efficacy and safety of piecemeal submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for giant esophageal leiomyoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Giant esophageal leiomyoma usually requires a thoracotomy or thoracoscopic surgery, which is more invasive than an endoscopic treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of piecemeal submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (P-STER) for giant leiomyoma originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer of the esophagus.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. Patients with giant esophageal leiomyoma (transverse diameter ≥ 3 cm) who underwent P-STER were enrolled from November 2012 to May 2023. Clinical data and results were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients were enrolled for analysis. The lesion mean transverse diameter and longitudinal diameter were 4.22 ± 1.20 cm and 6.20 ± 1.57 cm, respectively. Our mean operation time was 195.38 ± 84.99 min. The mean number of piecemeal resected was 4.31 ± 2.36. An adverse event noted was an esophageal fistula that occurred in one case (6.25%) and was treated conservatively. The mean length of hospital stay was around 11.81 ± 7.30 days. The mean total hospitalization cost was U.S. dollars (USD) $5976.50 ± 2866.39. No recurrence or metastasis was found during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

P-STER can be an effective and safe treatment for giant leiomyoma originating from the MP layer of the esophagus.

Endoscopic resection of giant esophageal subepithelial lesions: experience from a large tertiary center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Increased reports on endoscopic resection (ER) of esophageal giant subepithelial lesions (g-SELs) have emerged in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, technical difficulty, and safety through our single-center experience.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with g-SELs undergoing endoscopic resection were included in the training set. Clinicopathologic features, procedure-related characteristics, postprocedural outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed. A predictive nomogram model for procedural difficulty was proposed based on the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Internal and external validations were conducted to verify the model performance.

RESULTS

The overall en bloc resection rate was 93.3%. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events occurred in 7 (9.3%) and 13 (17.3%) patients, respectively. No recurrence or metastasis was observed. Thirty-two (42.7%) patients underwent a difficult procedure. Age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], .915; P = .004), maximal tumor diameter ≥8 cm (aOR, 9.896; P = .009), irregular shape (aOR, 4.081; P = .053), extraluminal growth pattern (aOR, 5.419; P = .011), and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (aOR, .109; P = .042) were found to be statistically or clinically significant factors for predicting endoscopic resection difficulty, based on which a nomogram model was developed. Internal and external validations of the nomogram via receiver-operating characteristic curves and calibration curves achieved favorable results.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic resection serves as a promising therapeutic option for esophageal g-SELs. A younger patient age, large tumor size, irregular shape, and extraluminal growth may indicate increased endoscopic resection difficulty, whereas a submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection procedure tends to be of lower difficulty. Our nomogram model performs well for predicting endoscopic resection difficulty for esophageal g-SELs.

Are biopsies during endoscopic ultrasonography necessary for a suspected esophageal leiomyoma? Is laparoscopy always feasible?

The present letter to the editor is related to the work entitled “Large leiomyoma of lower esophagus diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration: A case report.” Although endoscopic ultrasonography seems necessary in a suspected leiomyoma of the esophagus, the performance of biopsies via fine needle aspiration is controversial as it increases the risk of complications such as bleeding, infection, and intraoperative perforations. Laparoscopy is the best treatment strategy for small tumors. Laparotomy with tumor enucleation or esophageal resection can be considered in large leiomyomas.

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the Diagnosis of Suspicious Malignant Esophageal Strictures

(1) Background: The accurate diagnosis of esophageal strictures is quite critical for optimizing medical intervention. However, the diagnosis of suspicious malignant esophageal strictures with intact mucosa appearance and negative biopsy results is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of suspicious esophageal strictures. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases with suspicious malignant esophageal strictures that underwent EUS-FNA, with or without rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), in our hospital from April 2017 to September 2022. Their clinical manifestations, imaging examinations, gastroscopic examinations, EUS-FNA results, and therapeutic strategies were retrospectively recorded and analyzed. (3) Results: A total of 23 patients (15 male and 8 female) were enrolled in this study. Based on EUS-FNA results, 18 patients were diagnosed with malignancies, including 16 cases of primary esophageal cancer (13 squamous carcinomas and 3 adenocarcinomas), 1 case of mediastinal cancer, and 1 case of metastatic esophageal cancer; 1 case of tuberculosis was also confirmed by EUS-FNA. Among 4 cases of ambiguous diagnosis with EUS-FNA, 1 was diagnosed with an esophageal glomus tumor after surgical removal, and 2 patients survived for several years without medical intervention, which hinted at the possibility of benign esophageal strictures. No major complications, including bleeding or perforation, were observed. (4) Conclusions: EUS-FNA may serve as a safe and effective diagnostic tool in suspicious malignant esophageal strictures with accurate specimen acquisition, especially for biopsy-negative cases.

Submucosal endoscopy: the present and future

Submucosal endoscopy or third-space endoscopy utilizes the potential space between the mucosal and muscularis layers of the gastrointestinal tract to execute therapeutic interventions for various diseases. Over the last decade, endoscopic access to the submucosal space has revolutionized the field of therapeutic endoscopy. Submucosal endoscopy was originally used to perform endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia cardia, and its use has grown exponentially since. Currently, submucosal endoscopy is widely used to resect subepithelial tumors and to manage refractory gastroparesis and Zenker's diverticulum. While the utility of submucosal endoscopy has stood the test of time in esophageal motility disorders and subepithelial tumors, its durability remains to be established in conditions such as Zenker's diverticulum and refractory gastroparesis. Other emerging indications for submucosal endoscopy include esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, Hirschsprung's disease, and esophageal strictures not amenable to conventional endoscopic treatment. The potential of submucosal endoscopy to provide easy and safe access to the mediastinum and peritoneal spaces may open doors to novel indications and rejuvenate the interest of endoscopists in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in the future. This review focuses on the current spectrum, recent updates, and future direction of submucosal endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract.

Clinical study of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of submucosal tumor originating from the muscularis propria layer of the esophagus

Herein, we aimed to evaluate the clinical value and safety of transendoscopic submucosal tunnel tumor resection (STER) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the resection of esophageal submucosal intrinsic muscle tumors. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 68 patients with esophageal submucosal intrinsic muscle tumors treated with STER (STER group, n = 38, March 2018 to January 2020) or ESD (ESD group, n = 30, January 2017 to January 2020) at the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang to compare the treatment efficacy, hospitalization time and costs, and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. All 68 cases were of single lesions. The mean operative duration was shorter in the STER group (53.39 ± 11.57 min) than in the ESD group (68.33 ± 18.52 min, P < .05). The postoperative hospital stay duration was significantly shorter in the STER group (5.86 ± 1.01 days; P < .05) than in the ESD group (8.2 ± 3.4 days, P < .05). The mean hospitalization cost was significantly lower in the STER group than in the ESD group (12,468.8 + 4966.8 yuan vs 17,033.3 ± 4547.2 yuan; P < .05). Only 1 case of intraoperative perforation occurred in ESD group. There were no other complications in both groups. The wound healed in both groups, and no residual or recurrent tumors were detected during the follow-up period. Both STER and ESD can be used for the treatment of esophageal intrinsic muscular layer (MP) tumors, and STER is safer and more efficient for lesions with a diameter <3.5 cm.

Subepithelial tumors: How does endoscopic full-thickness resection & submucosal tunneling with endoscopic resection compare with laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery?

Background and study aims  Endoscopic techniques are rapidly emerging for resection of subepithelial tumors (SETs). Submucosal tunneling for endoscopic resection (STER), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) are current alternatives to open surgery. In this study, we aimed to compare the three endoscopic techniques. Patients and methods  Consecutive patients who underwent resection of a submucosal esophageal or gastric lesion at several tertiary care centers were included in a dedicated registry over 3 years. Demographics, size and location of resected lesion, histology of specimen, length of procedure, adverse events (AEs), duration of hospital stay, and follow-up data were collected. Results  Ninety-six patients were included (47.7 % male, mean age 62): STER n = 34, EFTR n = 34, LECS n = 280. The lesions included leiomyoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and other. The mean lesion size was 28 mm (STD 16, range 20-72 mm). The majority of lesions in the EFTR and laparoscopic-assisted resection group were GISTs. There was no significant difference in clear resection margins, post-procedure complication rates, recurrence rate and total follow-up duration between the groups. However, the LECS group had a procedure time at least 30 minutes longer than STER or EFTR ( P  < 0.01). Total hospital stay for the laparoscopic-assisted resection group was also longer when compared to STER (1.5) and EFTR (1.8) ( P  < 0.01). Conclusions  STER, EFTR, and laparoscopic-assisted resection are efficacious approaches for resection of SETs with similar R0 resection rates, complication rates, and AE rates. Laparoscopic assisted resection appears more time-consuming and is associated with a longer hospital stay.

Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Submucosal Tumors in the Proximal Esophagus

BACKGROUND

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is widely applied for treatment of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria layer. However, the tumor location within the proximal esophagus makes STER a challenge for the endoscopists. The aim of this study was to summarize the technique skill and evaluate the outcomes of proximal esophageal STER.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 72 patients with SMTs in the proximal esophagus undergoing STER were included from February 2019 to March 2021. Imaging 3-dimensional reconstruction was used for patients with large SMTs. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study, all the tumors were removed completely and no gross disease was remaining. The en bloc resection was achieved in 90.28% of patients, and the complications rate was 6.95%. Three-dimensional reconstruction was used for 30 patients (41.67%) with large SMTs (transverse diameter >2.0 cm). Based on statistical analysis, tumors with irregular shape and larger size were the significant contributors to piecemeal resection. Larger tumors increase the risk of long operation time, and irregular tumor shapes increase the risk of complications. The median hospitalization time was 4 days. All of the complications were cured by conservative treatment. A median follow-up of 12 months was available, and all patients were free from local recurrence or distant metastasis during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

STER is an effective and safe methodology for the resection of proximal esophageal SMTs. Tumor size and shape mainly impact the piecemeal resection rate, STER-related complications, and procedural difficulty.

Endoscopic resection of large subepithelial esophageal lesions via submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single-center, retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large subepithelial esophageal lesions (SELs) and analyze risk factors for perforation and piecemeal resection.

METHODS

The clinicopathological features and outcomes of endoscopic treatment of 56 patients with SELs with diameters ≥30 mm, diagnosed between June 2017 and December 2020, were reviewed in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups (ESD group and STER group).

RESULTS

The complete resection rates of the STER and ESD groups were 88.1% and 78.6%, respectively (p = .398). The operation time of STER was longer than ESD (p = .03), while the hospital stay of STER was shorter than ESD (p = .02). The rate of major adverse events associated with ESD was considerably higher than STER group (p = .035). The extraluminal growth pattern was a risk factor for piecemeal resection, and ESD was an independent risk factor for perforation. Regarding tumors with extraluminal growth patterns, the ESD group's perforation rate was significantly higher than the STER group (p = .009). There were no recurrence or metastases found during a mean follow-up of 24.4 months.

CONCLUSION

The STER technique has advantages of shorter hospital stays and fewer major adverse events than ESD. The extraluminal growth pattern seems to be a risk factor for piecemeal resection in both ESD and STER. STER appears to be a preferable choice for large SELs with extraluminal growth patterns.

Advances in endoscopic resection: a review of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER)

Subepithelial lesions are often detected incidentally in patients undergoing an endoscopy. They are common tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract which can originate from different layers of the GI tract wall. These lesions can be further classified based on GI layer of origin and unique histochemical staining. While most are benign and asymptomatic, some of these lesions have malignant potential with distant metastases. However, current diagnostic modalities including endoscopy with biopsy or endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration are not always reliable. In addition, management of these lesions has historically involved surgical resection via open or laparoscopic approaches. In recent years, with advancement in endoscopic techniques and improvement in endoscopists' skills, less invasive procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) have been developed and now are being used by endoscopists worldwide. Upon reviewing the literature, multiple studies have shown the advantages of these endoscopic techniques when compared with surgical treatment. As a result, there has been a dramatic shift towards minimally invasive endoscopic procedures for the management of these subepithelial lesions. In this review article, we will discuss these endoscopic resection techniques in detail, their safety and efficacy, as well as comparison studies to other therapeutic modalities.

Endoscopic treatment can be a viable therapeutic option for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) are extremely rare. We sought to determine whether endoscopic treatment can be a viable therapeutic option for esophageal GISTs.

METHODS

A total of 20 cases with histological diagnosis of esophageal GISTs were obtained from our center between 2008 and 2020. Data on the clinicopathological features and treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 9 males (45%) and 11 females (55%) in this study, with a median age of 56 years. The tumors preferentially occurred in the middle and lower parts of the thoracic esophagus (45 and 40%, respectively). The mean size of the tumors was 2.27 cm and mitotic index was no more than 5/50 high power field (HPF) in all patients. In this study, 11 patients received endoscopic treatment and nine patients underwent surgical resection. Tumors ranged from 0.6 to 4 cm in the endoscopic treatment patients and 0.5 to 7 cm in the surgical patients. There were no significant differences in gender, age, symptoms, tumor location, tumor size, mitotic index, and adjuvant imatinib therapy between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgery group (all p > .05). The Kaplan-Meier curve suggested that there was also no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (p = .264).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment may be an option for the treatment of esophageal GISTs smaller than 5 cm with a mitotic index no more than 5/50 HPF.

A Review of Endoscopic Full-thickness Resection, Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection, and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Resection of Subepithelial Lesions

Gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (SETs) are often found while performing routine endoscopy. Recently, there has been the development of new endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection, and endoscopic full-thickness resection, all minimally invasive approaches which have made it possible to resect SETs that were previously resected with surgery. This review discusses the endoscopic treatment of patients with SETs, outcomes for endoscopic treatment, procedure-related complications, and advantages and disadvantages of these endoscopic techniques.

Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection

Minimally invasive endoscopic resection procedures continue to evolve, with submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) being a durable option for en bloc resection of submucosal tumors. Whether STER can be effectively used for larger (>3.5 cm) lesions remains to be seen. STER-ET is a novel approach for removal of extraluminal tumors, but data are currently limited to support its use.

Clinical outcomes in the surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma: A retrospective evaluation of 13 cases

Background

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes after enucleation of esophageal leiomyomas and present the feasibility of enucleation using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Methods

The medical records of 13 patients (8 males, 5 females; mean age 45.9 years; range, 30 to 69 years) who underwent open or thoracoscopic surgery for an esophageal leiomyoma between April 2007 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were evaluated with regard to age, sex, presenting symptoms, duration of symptoms, size and localization of tumors, diagnostic methods, surgical methods, conversion to open surgery, morbidity and mortality, discharge time, and follow-up period.

Results

Of the patients, four were operated via thoracotomy and nine via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Enucleation was successfully completed with thoracoscopy in five patients. Four patients required conversion to thoracotomy. In the early postoperative period, two of these four patients developed complications and underwent re-thoracotomy. A solitary leiomyoma was detected in all, but one patient (multiple). The mean size of the tumors was 68.4 mm. Complications were seen in only one patient during follow-up and no recurrence was observed in any patient.

Conclusion

Our study results indicate that thoracoscopic enucleation of esophageal leiomyoma is a safe, feasible, and effective technique in selected patients and conversion to open surgery can be easily done for any reason during the procedure.

Third Space Endoscopy: Lessons Learnt From a Decade of Submucosal Endoscopy

The field of third space endoscopy (TSE), also called submucosal endoscopy using a mucosal flap valve, allows secure access to the submucosal and deeper layers of the gastrointestinal tract without the risk of a full-thickness perforation. Since the first description of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia cardia 10 years ago, this field has expanded rapidly. Several new procedures, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, gastric-POEM, Zenker POEM, per-rectal endoscopic myotomy, diverticular POEM, and recanalization for complete esophageal obstruction (per-oral endoscopic tunneling for restoration of the esophagus), have been performed. All TSE procedures employ a similar technique-after a mucosal incision, a submucosal tunnel is created, a myotomy is performed, or a subepithelial tumor is resected distal to the site of mucosal incision, after which the mucosal incision is closed. Potential indications for TSE include resection of subepithelial tumors in the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or stomach; refractory gastroparesis; Zenker diverticulum; Hirschsprung disease or other forms of megacolon; and recanalization for complete esophageal obstruction. Data are currently available for POEM, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and gastric-POEM, although mainly in the form of retrospective studies, and randomized trials and long-term follow-up data are limited. Submucosal endoscopy has an excellent safety profile with very few intraoperative adverse events, the majority being related to insufflation, although bleeding, perforation, and sepsis have been reported. TSE procedures require special training and have demonstrated a learning curve.

Comparison Between Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection (STER) and Other Resection Modules for Esophageal Muscularis Propria Tumors: A Retrospective Study

Background

Surgery has been considered to be the primary approach for resection of esophageal muscularis propria tumors. With the development of endoscopic technology, new techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) have emerged for resecting these lesions. Previous studies have demonstrated that STER might be an intriguing alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of STER by comparing it to other resecting modules.

Material/Methods

Clinical outcome and data were retrospectively collected from patients with esophageal muscularis propria tumors who underwent resection either endoscopically or thoracoscopically. The clinical data were statistically analyzed.

Results

A total of 137 patients were enrolled. They were divided into 3 groups: a STER group (27 patients), an ESD group (42 patients), and a thoracoscopic enucleation (TE) group (68 patients). There were no significant differences among the 3 groups in gender, age, pathological type of tumors, or major adverse events (P>0.05). However, the STER group had the shortest duration of hospitalization and the lowest cost (P<0.05). Furthermore, the STER group was superior in operation time and the location of tumors to the TE group. Moreover, STER outperformed ESD in the resection of large tumors (P<0.05). Although STER had the lowest en bloc resection rate, no recurrence or metastasis was noted during a mean follow-up of 22.14 months (range 3 to 60 months).

Conclusions

STER is a feasible, safe, and effective approach for the resection of esophageal muscularis propria tumors ≤40 mm. We recommend STER as a potent alternative for these tumors.

The retrospective comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic submucosal excavation for managing esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer

BACKGROUND

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) were recently introduced to cure submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. This study aimed to compare clinical performance and safety of STER and ESE in treating esophageal SMTs originating from the MP layer.

METHODS

From January 2011 to December 2017, retrospective data collection and follow-up were applied for all STER or ESE cases with esophageal SMTs originating from the MP layer in our endoscopy center, including clinical characteristics, procedure success, efficacy, and adverse events. Subgroup analysis was further done based on tumor size and origin.

RESULTS

90 STER and 77 ESE were enrolled in this study. There were no significant difference for  patient characteristics, procedure performance, and complications for ESE and STER intervention (P > 0.05). STER was faster than ESE (3.90 mm²/min vs 2.82 mm²/min, P < 0.05). For large tumors (≥ 20 mm), both techniques had the similar performance (P > 0.05), while STER led to the shorter hospitalization (4.0d vs 7.0d, P < 0.05) and lower postoperative complication (16.3% vs 45.5%, P < 0.05). For small tumors (< 20 mm), STER achieved faster operation (STER vs ESE, 2.57 mm²/min vs 1.83 mm²/min, P < 0.05). Regardless of tumor origin, there were no significant difference for both techniques, but STER resulted in short hospitalization for SMTs from the deep MP layer (STER vs ESE, 5.0d vs 7.0d, P < 0.05). During the follow-up, 2 residual and 4 recurrence occurred in the STER group, as well as 1 residual and 2 recurrence in the ESE group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both STER and ESE were effective for treating esophageal SMTs originating from the MP layer. STER might be better due to its faster operation, less complications, and shorter hospitalization.

Risk factors associated with prolonged air leak after video-assisted thoracic surgery pulmonary resection: a predictive model and meta-analysis

Background

This study aimed to establish a predictive model for prolonged air leak (PAL) after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung resection; and additionally, to present a meta-analysis of the relevant literature to estimate the association between various clinical factors and PAL.

Methods

A retrospective, case-control study was conducted using univariate analysis and logistic regression based on 493 medical records from patients who underwent VATS lung resection between January 2015 and August 2017 at our institution. PAL was defined as air leak more than 5 days after lung surgery. Subsequently, a nomogram was established as a predictive model. Relevant studies were screened from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for relevant studies and data was extracted from those enrolled. Pooled odds ratios or weighted mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated to estimate the association between various clinical factors and PAL.

Results

Incidence of PAL after VATS lung resection was observed in 54 (10.8%) of 493 patients. Logistic regression revealed that smoking (P=0.014), pulmonary function (P=0.011), pleural adhesion (P<0.001), stapling length (P<0.001), early postoperative drainage (P=0.002) were significantly associated with PAL. Our meta-analysis, including 17 eligible studies and 14 potential risk factors, further validating our findings. Upper lobectomy was determined to be a significant risk factor for PAL in Europeans and North Americans (OR =2.03, P<0.001), but not in Asians (OR =1.04, P=0.610). Importantly, the constructed nomogram demonstrated a good predictive ability (C-index =0.858).

Conclusions

Lung stapling length and early postoperative drainage are important indicators for the evaluation of PAL occurrence. Upper pulmonary resection is a factor with particular regional differences as its association with PAL is not significant within Asian populations. Our nomogram, incorporating multiple factors, provided a simple and practical predictive model with value for clinical application.

Consensus on the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique

With the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique (DETT), many diseases that previously would have been treated by surgery are now endoscopically curable by establishing a submucosal tunnel between the mucosa and muscularis propria (MP). Through the tunnel, endoscopic diagnosis or treatment is performed for lesions in the mucosa, in the MP, and even outside the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. At present, the tunnel technique application range covers the following: (1) Treatment of lesions originating from the mucosal layer, e.g., endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for oesophageal large or circular early-stage cancer or precancerosis; (2) treatment of lesions from the MP layer, per-oral endoscopic myotomy, submucosal tunnelling endoscopic resection, etc.; and (3) diagnosis and treatment of lesions outside the GI tract, such as resection of lymph nodes and benign tumour excision in the mediastinum or abdominal cavity. With the increasing number of DETTs performed worldwide, endoscopic tunnel therapeutics, which is based on DETT, has been gradually developed and optimized. However, there is not yet an expert consensus on DETT to regulate its indications, contraindications, surgical procedure, and postoperative treatment. The International DETT Alliance signed up this consensus to standardize the procedures of DETT. In this consensus, we describe the definition, mechanism, and significance of DETT, prevention of infection and concepts of DETT-associated complications, methods to establish a submucosal tunnel, and application of DETT for lesions in the mucosa, in the MP and outside the GI tract (indications and contraindications, procedures, pre- and postoperative treatments, effectiveness, complications and treatments, and a comparison between DETT and other operations).

Submucosal 1-tunnel endoscopic resection for treating upper gastrointestinal multiple submucosal tumor originating from the muscularis propria layer: A report of 12 cases

To explore the feasibility and efficacy of submucosal 1-tunnel endoscopic resection (1-tunnel STER) for the treatment of multiple upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (GI-SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer.A total of 12 patients with multiple upper GI-SMTs (no less than 2 SMTs) who underwent 1-tunnel STER from April 2013 to October 2017 were included. Clinical data on general characteristics, operation-related parameters, adverse events, and follow-up results were recorded and analyzed.All 12 patients underwent 1-tunnel STER successfully, and the mean operation time was 92.1 ± 40.8 minutes. A total of 30 SMTs were resected, out of which 27 were in the esophagus and 3 were in the stomach. The mean diameter was 15.0 ± 8.2 mm (range, 3-38 mm). All the SMTs were resected en bloc uneventfully. The SMTs comprised 28 leiomyomas and 2 gastric stromal tumors (low risk). No recurrence was noticed during a mean follow-up of 24.9 ± 15.3 months (range, 1-52 months).One-tunnel STER may serve as a feasible and effective technique for the treatment of multiple upper GI-SMTs originating from the MP layer. A large-scale prospective study is warranted for a confirmative conclusion.

Esophageal Third Space Endoscopy: Recent Advances

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The novel concept of third space endoscopy was first applied to humans in 2008 for the management of achalasia through peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) procedure. Over the ensuing 10 years, this revolutionary procedure, which started in Japan, has been adopted and mastered by surgeons and gastroenterologists across the globe. In this article, we review the recent innovations and applications of third space endoscopy in the management of esophageal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

With experience and innovation, the application of third-space endoscopy has extended beyond achalasia, and currently, it is used in the management of other esophageal disorders including, spastic esophageal disorders, subepithelial tumors, complete esophageal obstruction, and esophageal diverticula. The recent advances in third space endoscopic procedures have not only permitted endoscopic access to places, previously thought impossible, but also enabled the precision of surgery along with reduced peri-operative morbidity due to its minimally invasive nature. While short- and mid-term outcome studies have shown excellent results, we eagerly await the long-term outcome studies before these procedures could be established as the procedures of choice.

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection: An effective and safe therapy for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and compare its outcomes in esophageal and cardial submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the muscularis propria (MP) layer.

METHODS

From May 2012 to November 2017, 173 consecutive patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) SMTs of the MP layer underwent STER. Overall, 165 patients were included, and 8 were excluded. The baseline characteristics of the patients and SMTs were recorded. The en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, residual rate, and recurrence rate were calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of STER, and the complication rate was recorded to evaluate its safety. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were compared between esophageal and cardial SMTs.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve men and 53 women with a mean age of 46.9 ± 10.8 years were included. The mean tumor size was 22.6 ± 13.6 mm. Eleven SMTs were located in the upper esophagus (6.7%), 49 in the middle esophagus (29.7%), 46 in the lower esophagus (27.9%), and 59 in the cardia (35.7%). Irregular lesions accounted for 48.5% of all lesions. STER achieved an en bloc resection rate of 78.7% (128/165) for GI SMTs with an overall complication rate of 21.2% (35/165). All complications resolved without intervention or were treated conservatively without the need for surgery. The en bloc resection rates of esophageal and cardial SMTs were 81.1% (86/106) and 72.1% (42/59), respectively (P = 0.142), and the complication rates were 19.8% (21/106) and 23.7% (14/59), respectively, (P = 0.555). The most common complications for esophageal SMTs were gas-related complications and fever, while mucosal injury was the most common for cardial SMTs.

CONCLUSION

STER is an effective and safe therapy for GI SMTs of the MP layer. Its effectiveness and safety are comparable between SMTs of the esophagus and cardia.

Submucosal Tunnel Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Submucosal Tumors: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Submucosal tumors (SMTs) are primarily benign tumors, but some may have a malignant potential. Endoscopic submucosal dissection that has been used for removing esophageal SMTs could cause perforation. Submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection (STER) is an improved and an effective technique for treating esophageal SMTs.

AIMS

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of STER for treating esophageal SMTs.

METHODS

A retrospective study design was adopted to analyze the baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and follow-up data of patients with esophageal SMTs, which originated from the muscularis propria layer and were treated with STER from September 2011 to May 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 119 lesions were included from 115 patients who were successfully treated with STER. The mean age of the patients was 49.7 ± 10.7 years. The lesions were primarily located in the middle and lower esophagus. The mean size of the lesions was 19.4 ± 10.0 mm. The mean operation duration was 46.7 ± 25.6 min, and the mean duration of hospitalization was 5.9 ± 2.8 days. The total en bloc resection rate and the complete resection rate were 97.5% and 100%, respectively. Regarding complications, there were 9 (7.8%) cases of perforation, 2 (1.7%) cases of pneumothorax, and 9 (7.8%) cases of subcutaneous emphysema. Histopathological results revealed 113 (95.0%) cases of leiomyoma, 5 (4.2%) cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and 1 (0.8%) case of a granular cell tumor. During the mean 15-month follow-up, there were no cases of recurrence and distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

STER is a safe and feasible technique for treating esophageal SMTs originating from the muscularis propria layer.

Treatment of cardial submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection versus endoscopic submucosal excavation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is increasingly used for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria layer; however, endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) is still performed in many hospitals for its low-skill and experience requirements. This study aimed to compare STER with ESE for cardial SMTs.

METHODS

From March 2013 to February 2017, patients with cardial SMTs undergoing STER (n = 47) and ESE (n = 40) were retrospectively assessed. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and complication data were compared between STER and ESE groups.

RESULTS

The 87 enrolled patients included 31 females and 56 males, aged 48.2 ± 9.8 years. Mean tumor size was 22.0 mm (range 5.0-80.0 mm) as evaluated by pathology. Demographic and lesion features were similar in both groups. Despite similar hospital stay duration and cost, ESE was superior to STER with reduced operation time (34 vs. 46 min, P = 0.013) and less clips required (3 vs. 5, P = 0.000). En bloc resection rates, complete resection rates, hospital stay duration, cost, complications, and hemoglobin levels were similar in both groups. Irregular-shaped SMTs were more likely to achieve piecemeal resection in both STER and ESE groups (all P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the piecemeal resection rate was significantly higher for larger tumors in the STER group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with ESE, STER does not show overt advantages for cardial SMTs. However, ESE is superior to STER for reduced operation time. Irregular tumor shape seems to be a risk factor for piecemeal resection in both STER and ESE.

A comparison of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric fundus submucosal tumors

AIM

Both submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are effective methods for gastric fundus submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, there is little data that compares the two methods. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of STER and EFTR for the treatment of SMTs in the gastric fundus.

METHODS

Clinical data was retrospectively collected from patients with gastric fundus SMTs who underwent STER or EFTR at our hospital from April 2011 to May 2016. Epidemiological data (gender, age), tumor size, procedure-related parameters, complications, postoperative hospital stay, cost and follow-up data were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were enrolled: 15 underwent STER and the remaining 28 cases underwent EFTR. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gender, age, tumor size, en bloc resection rate, operation time, pathohistological results and cost (p > 0.05). However, patients who underwent EFTR had a longer suture time, required a larger number of clips for closure and a prolonged postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.05). No recurrence was noted in either the STER or the EFTR group during a mean follow-up of 12.1 and 22.8 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment efficacy of STER and EFTR for the treatment of gastric fundus SMTs was comparable. However, STER has some advantages over EFTR in terms of suture time, the number of clips required for closure and postoperative hospital stay.

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for treatment of esophageal leiomyomas arising from the muscularis propria

AIM

To investigate the safety and indications of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) by comparing the results of STER with other operations for the treatment of esophageal leiomyomas originating from the muscularis propria layer.

METHODS

We enrolled 121 patients with esophageal leiomyomas originating from the muscularis propria layer who underwent resection from November 1, 2011 to March 1, 2018 in this retrospective study. The clinical features and treatment results were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the thoracoscopic enucleation (TE) group and the endoscopic resection (ER) group in tumor location and size, operation time, en bolc resection rate, average hospital stay and cost (P < 0.05). There was also a significant difference in the en bolc resection rate, operative time, average hospital stay and cost between the STER group and the ER group (P < 0.05). Although tumor diameter of the STER group (2-40 mm; mean, 17.68 mm) was smaller than that of the TE group (5-80 mm; mean, 20.33 mm), the difference was not significant (P = 0.229). Tumor size, en bolc resection rate, average hospital stay and cost also differed significantly between the STER group and the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) group (P < 0.05). The en bolc resection rate of the STER group was lower than those of other groups, but no tumor recurrence or metastasis was detected during the follow-up period (mean: 22.4 mo; range: 3-60 mo) in the three groups.

CONCLUSION

STER is safe and effective for the treatment of esophageal leiomyomas originating from the muscularis propria layer. We recommend STER for the tumors smaller than 4 cm.

Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and video-assisted thoracoscopic enucleation for esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Surgical resection is considered the first treatment option for submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria layer while submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is proved to be a safe and effective method for treating SMTs. This study aimed to compare video-assisted thoracoscopic enucleation (VATE) with STER for treating esophageal SMTs.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with small esophageal SMTs were prospectively randomized from July 2014 to December 2015. After exclusion of 8 patients, 58 subjects scheduled for STER or VATE were enrolled. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and adverse events (AEs) data were collected and analyzed between STER and VATE.

RESULTS

Forty-six males and 12 females with a mean age of 46.1 ± 9.4 years were randomized to the STER (n = 30) and VATE (n = 28) groups, respectively. Demographics and lesion features were similar between the two groups. Median procedure time was shorter in the STER group than the VATE group (44.5 vs. 106.5 min, P < 0.001); cost was lower in the STER group (4499.46 vs. 6137.32 USD, P = 0.010). Median decrease in hemoglobin levels post-procedure was - 1.6 g/L in the STER group and 14.7 g/L after VATE (P = 0.001). Lower postoperative pain scores were found in the STER group compared with the VATE group (2 vs. 4, P < 0.001). No recurrent or residual tumors were found in either group. En bloc resection rates, complete resection rates, hospital times, and post-procedure AEs were similar between two groups. The en bloc resection rates for SMTs < 20.0 mm were 100% in both groups while STER achieved only 71.4% en bloc resection rate for SMTs ≥ 20.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

STER and VATE are comparably effective for esophageal SMTs; however, STER is superior to VATE with shorter operation time and decreased cost, and seems safer than VATE. STER is recommended for SMTs < 20.0 mm while VATE is recommended for SMTs with a transverse diameter > 35.0 mm. Clinical trail registration statement: This study is registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=4814 . The registration identification number is ChiCTR-TRC-14004759. The registration date is April 30, 2014.

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Recent advances in minimally invasive endoscopic approaches have pushed the boundaries of well-established resection techniques for therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Endoscopic full thickness resection techniques are a key development in the management of challenging epithelial and subepithelial lesions that are not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection methods and previously required a surgical approach. Endoscopic full thickness biopsy represents a paradigm shift in tissue acquisition and will enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology, and guide therapy, of gastrointestinal neuromuscular diseases, as well as other inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. This review highlights current tools and techniques available for endoscopic full thickness resection and biopsy, as well as outcomes from such interventions.

Factors affecting the effectiveness and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for esophageal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has been proved to be effective and safe for esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. This study was aimed to further evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and influencing factors especially the types of mucosal incision of STER in a larger population.

METHODS

A total of 89 patients undergoing STER with esophageal SMTs were retrospectively enrolled in this study from May 2012 to November 2016. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and adverse events (AEs) data were collected and analyzed. Different incision methods were compared to evaluate the optimum incision method.

RESULTS

There were 27 females and 62 males with mean age of 46.5 ± 10.3 years. The medium size of the tumors was 16.0 mm (ranging 10.0-60.0 mm). Inverted T incisions were made in 29 (32.6%) patients, transverse incisions in 12 (13.5%) while longitudinal incisions in 48 (53.9%). En bloc resection was achieved in 70 (78.7%) patients. The residual rate was 1.1% (1/89), and no recurrence was noted even after piecemeal resection. The rate of AEs was 21.3% (19/89), and all of the AEs were cured without intervention or treated conservatively without the need for surgery. The en bloc resection rate was comparable among the three incision groups (P = 0.868); however, the incidence of AEs in the inverted T incision was lower than that in the longitudinal incision (P = 0.003). Fewer clips were used in the inverted T incision group than in the transverse incision group (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Although STER failed to achieve en bloc resection in 21.3% patients, it was still an effective therapy owing to low residual rate and no recurrence rate after piecemeal resection. STER was safe with no severe AEs; however, minor AEs were common. Inverted T incision seems to be the optimum entry point.

Endoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, and about 60% of them are found in the stomach. With the widespread application of endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), more and more gastric GISTs are being found in an early stage (with a relative small diameter and no metastasis), giving the chance of complete resection. Endoscopic resection such as endoscopic band ligation (EBL), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), is a minimally invasive method compared with the conventional surgical approaches (open or laparoscopic), and has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for treating gastric GISTs. This review summarizes the recent advances on endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs, aiming to provide a rational management strategy for gastric GISTs.

Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Submucosal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria Layer

Surgical resection and endoscopic resection comprise two alternative options for the treatment of submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. Endoscopic resection is minimally invasive compared with surgical resection. Conventional non-tunneling techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR) have been demonstrated to be safe and effective. However, these techniques fail to maintain the integrity of the mucosa and induce high risk of perforation, infection, and postoperative strictures. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is a novel surgical technique that can maintain the integrity of the mucosa by establishing a tunnel between the submucosal and the MP layers. STER has been proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of SMTs. Currently, STER has become a standard treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) SMTs originating from the MP layer, notably in China. In the present review, we describe the indications, procedures, postoperative care, efficacy and safety outcomes, and future perspectives of STER for GI SMTs originating from the MP layer.

Current status of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer

Gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) have been increasingly identified via the use of endoscopic ultrasonography, and removal is often recommended for SMTs that are >2 cm in diameter or symptomatic. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), also known as submucosal endoscopic tumor resection, endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection or tunneling endoscopic muscularis dissection, is a novel endoscopic technique for treating gastrointestinal SMTs originating from the muscularis propria layer, and has been demonstrated to be effective in the removal of SMTs with a decreased rate of recurrence by clinical studies. STER may be performed for patients with esophageal or cardia SMTs, and its application has expanded beyond these types of SMTs due to modifications to the technique. The present study reviewed the applications, procedure, efficacy and complications associated with STER.

Comparison between submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric stromal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer

BACKGROUND

Both submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) are effective method for treating gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); however, little is known about the comparison between STER and EFTR. The aim of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of STER and EFTR for treating gastric GIST.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data about patients with gastric GISTs who received STER or EFTR at our hospital from April 2011 to June 2016. Epidemiological data (gender, age), tumor size, procedure-related parameters, complications, length of stay, cost and follow-up data were compared between STER and EFTR.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were enrolled, and 20 of them received STER, while the other 32 cases received EFTR. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, concomitant diseases, tumor size, en bloc resection rate, operation time, complications, pathohistological grade of GIST, hospital stay and cost (P > 0.05). However, patients who received EFTR had a longer suture time and needed more clips to close the gastric-wall defect (STER vs EFTR, 291.5 ± 68.7 vs 380.6 ± 96.9s and 6.0 ± 1.2 vs 7.6 ± 1.6, P < 0.05). No recurrence was noted in the STER and EFTR groups during a mean follow-up of 10.9 and 23.8 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment efficacy between STER and EFTR for treating gastric GISTs was comparable, and a large-scale, randomized study is necessary for a more confirmed conclusion.

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal tract tumors arising from muscularis propria

The management of incidentally discovered small upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract submucosal tumors (SMT) remains debatable. In this review, we summarize the evolving experience with submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) of upper GI SMTs originating from the muscularis propria. From 16 original studies, we reviewed a total of 703 patients with 736 lesions. Of these, 436 were located in the esophagus, 146 in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and 154 in the stomach. The composite complete resection rate (CRR) for STER of upper GI tumors arising from the muscularis propria layer was 99.8% (445/446). The composite CRR for STER of esophageal, EGJ and gastric SMTs arising from the muscularis propria layer was 100% (208/208),100% (78/78)and 100% (115/115), respectively. The composite en bloc resection rate (EBRR) for STER of upper GI tumors arising from the muscularis propria layer was 94.6% (679/718). The composite EBRR for STER of esophageal, EGJ and gastric SMTs arising from the muscularis propria layer was 98.6% (205/208), 96.2% (75/78) and 97.9% (95/97), respectively. Tumor recurrence rate was 0%. The reported complication rate for STER was high but the majority responded to conservative management. STER is a minimally invasive and efficacious alternative to surgery, especially for patients with small tumors (<3 cm). Careful selection of candidates remains crucial for excluding potentially malignant tumors.

POEM and Submucosal Tunneling

OPINION STATEMENT

Submucosal endoscopy has introduced new and important aspects into gastrointestinal endoscopic therapeutics by opening the way to interventions even outside of the GI tract. At present, innovative techniques for submucosal endoscopy in different esophageal diseases include peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for idiopathic achalasia and related motility disorders, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) for submucosal tumors arising from the muscularis propria, and endoscopic submucosal tunneling dissection (ESTD) for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions. POEM for achalasia-still a rare disease-is currently evaluated in comparison to endoscopic and surgical standard therapies, while this procedure enabling a long thoracic myotomy might constitute an advantage over the laparoscopic approach in treatments of spastic esophageal diseases. Removal of smaller submucosal esophageal tumors may appear tempting, but the clinical indications are limited by the facts that the vast majority of such smaller tumors are asymptomatic and benign.For all these innovative and technically demanding techniques, learning curves have to be taken into account, not only with regard to technical competence but also to clinical assessment, ranging from proper indication and patient selection to the management of (potential) complications and logistics/back-up. Although preliminary results from high-skilled endoscopic centers have been very encouraging, long-term data as well as prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of the modalities.