Is magnetic anal sphincter augmentation still an option in fecal incontinence treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Magnetic anal sphincter (MAS) augmentation is a novel surgical option for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Current clinical evidence is conflicting. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to report the safety profile, potential benefits, and the functional efficacy of this device.

METHODS

The study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Literature databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL) were screened for eligible articles. The primary endpoint was the pooled effect of MAS in the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) score. Quality evaluation was based on the ROBINS-I and Risk of Bias 2 tool.

RESULTS

Overall, 8 studies with 205 patients were included. MAS resulted in a significant reduction of CCIS values (p = 0.019), and improvement only in the embarrassment domain of FIQoL scores (p = 0.034). The overall morbidity rate was 61.8%. Postoperative adverse events included MAS explantation in 12%, infection in 5.1%, pain in 10% and obstructed defecation in 5.8% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The application of MAS in patients with fecal incontinence results in the improvement of some clinical parameters with a notable morbidity rate. Due to several study limitations, further, high-quality RCTs are required to delineate the efficacy and safety of MAS.

The Role of Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS) in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pooled efficacy of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA guidelines. The primary endpoint was the pooled effect size of PTNS in LARS score (LARSS). Secondary endpoints included incontinence (Fecal Incontinence Score-FIC, Obstructive Defecation Syndrome-ODS), sexual functionality and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, and manometric evaluations. Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD), with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Quality evaluation was performed via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 studies were included. PTNS resulted to reduced LARSS values (WMD: - 5.68, 95%CI: - 7.73, - 3.63, p < 0.001). A similar effect was noted in St Mark's FIC (p < 0.001) and ODS (p = 0.02) score. An improvement in several QoL scales was found. There was no effect in sexual functionality and manometric measurements. Compared to sham, PTNS significantly improved LARSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of PTNS in patients with LARS results in an improvement in multiple clinical parameters, including defecation functionality and quality of life. Due to several study limitations, further high quality RCTs are required to delineate the exact efficacy of PTNS.