A systematic review and meta-analysis concerning single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele

Application of the laparoscopic auxiliary needle device in the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia: an eight-year experience

BACKGROUND

Pediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical condition among children. In this study, we present the application of a self-designed laparoscopic auxiliary needle device (China Patent Number: ZL 201320479515.5) and evaluate its effectiveness in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure in pediatric patients.

METHODS

The laparoscopic auxiliary needle device, with a diameter of 1 mm, consists of a cylindrical needle body and a specifically designed front end. Between January 2013 and January 2021, a total of 2075 children with inguinal hernia (1864 males and 211 females, mean age 3.71 ± 2.95 years old) were included in this study. All patients underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the laparoscopic auxiliary needle device. Various data were collected including occult inguinal hernia incidence, complications such as recurrence, and follow-up findings.

RESULTS

The entire patient cohort underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the laparoscopic auxiliary needle. Pneumoperitoneum lasted 5.1 ± 1.2 min in unilateral hernia cases and 11.0 ± 1.3 min in bilateral hernia cases. Occult inguinal hernia were found in 981 (47.3%) patients, out of which initially difficult diagnoses were encountered in 516 cases (24.9%). Postoperative follow-up ranged from 3 to 96 months, with two instances (0.1%) of inguinal hernia recurrence reported. Importantly, no patients reported any visible scars or sensations of subcutaneous foreign bodies.

CONCLUSION

Based on our extensive patient cohort, we assert that our self-designed laparoscopic auxiliary needle device represents a valuable tool for performing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs while minimizing abdominal scarring. Additionally, this device offers the additional advantage of detecting contralateral occult inguinal hernia.

Modifications of surgical techniques in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of inguinal ring for childhood inguinal hernia to achieve zero recurrence and zero subcutaneous stitch granuloma

PURPOSE

To present our technical modifications of single incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) of the internal inguinal ring (IIR) for pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH).

METHODS

The prospectively collected data of all children diagnosed with PIH undergoing SILPEC at our center from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed and divided into two groups for result comparison: Group A: before and Group B: after the implementation of full modifications. Our modifications included using a nonabsorbable monofilament suture, creating a peritoneal thermal injury at the internal inguinal ring (IIR), employing a cannula to ensure the suture at the IIR ligates only the peritoneum, and double ligation of the IIR in selected cases.

RESULTS

1755 patients in group A and in group B (1 month to 14 years old) were enrolled. There were no significant differences regarding baseline patient characteristics between the two groups. At a median follow-up of 40 months, the rate of recurrent CIH and subcutaneous stitch granuloma (SSG) was 2.3% and 1.5% in group A vs. 0% and 0% in group B (p < 0.001). There were no hydroceles, no ascended or atrophic testis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our SILPEC technical modifications can achieve zero recurrence and zero SSG for PIH.

Single-Port Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Repair of Pediatric Inguinal Hernias and Hydroceles by Using Hernia Crochet Needle With a Cannula

PURPOSE

Numerous modifications laparoscopic techniques have mushroomed in recent years. Here we describe a modified technique of extracorporeal ligation of processus vaginalis in children using a hernia crochet needle with a cannula.

METHODS

Processus vaginalis repair was carried out on patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia or hydroceles using this novel technique between June 2021 and June 2022. The processus vaginalis was closed extracorporeally using a hernia crochet needle with a cannula. In the presence of patent processus vaginalis, the same procedure would be performed on the contralateral side. The primary outcomes was the safety and efficiency of this modified procedure, and the secondary outcomes was the post operative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 212 (165 inguinal hernia and 47 hydroceles) children were corrected by this novel technique. The mean operation time was 27.49 min for unilateral inguinal hernia cases and 36.55 min for bilateral cases. The unilateral hydrocele median operation time was 27.83 min and that for the bilateral cases was 37.30 min. During the mean of 10.92 months of follow-up, there was only a boy subject to a metachronous contralateral occurrence of hernia 10 months after surgery, and no other complications (knot reactions, testicular atrophy, postoperative hydrocele or iatrogenic) have been observed yet.

CONCLUSION

This study shown a unique procedure with using a hernia crochet needle with a cannula to be simple, safe, and effective in managing inguinal hernias and hydroceles in the pediatric population.

Comparison of the results of open repair and laparoscopic repair with the PIRS method in the treatment of hydrocele in children

PURPOSE

Hydrocele is a result of intraperitoneal fluid filling into the scrotum through the patent processus vaginalis (PPV). While the traditional approach of pediatric hydrocele has been open repair (OR) for years, laparoscopic repair (LR) of hydrocele has been accepted worldwide after the proven efficacy of laparoscopy. The purpose is to compare the outcomes of both techniques in a single center.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of all the patients who underwent hydrocele repair from August 2016 to November 2022. In our center, the standard approach was OR in hydrocele until the November of 2021. Starting from this date, LR has begun to be preferred, as the experience has increased and its success has been observed. In the LR group, single-port percutaneous internal ring suturing technique was performed.

RESULTS

The data of 113 patients (OR 58.4% (n = 66), LR 41.6% (n = 47)) were collected. In preoperative examination, 12.4% (n = 14) patients were diagnosed as communicating and 87.6% (n = 99) non-communicating hydrocele. Intraoperatively, 65.5% (n = 74) patients were communicating and 34.5% (n = 39) were non-communicating. Total recurrence rate was 7% (n = 8). The OR group experienced a recurrence rate of 10.6% (n = 7), while the LR group experienced 2.12% (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy may reveal intrabdominal connection of hydrocele better than open approach. It provides a high quality view of both inguinal rings and has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Causes of recurrence of paediatric inguinal hernia after single-port laparoscopic closure

PURPOSE

This paper explores the causes of paediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) recurrence after single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SPLPEC).

METHOD

From January 2015 to December 2020, the clinical data of 3480 children with PIHs who underwent SPLPEC were retrospectively reviewed, including 644 children who underwent SPLPEC with a homemade single-hook hernia needle from January 2015 to December 2016 and 2836 children who underwent the SPLPEC with a double-hook hernia needle and hydrodissection from January 2017 to December 2020. There were 39 recurrences (including communicating hydrocele) during the 2-5 years of follow-up. The findings of redo-laparoscopy were recorded and correlated with the revised video of the first operation to analyse the causes of recurrence.

RESULT

Thirty-three males and 6 females experienced recurrence, and 8 patients had a unilateral communicating hydrocele. The median time to recurrence was 7.1 months (0-38). There were 20 cases (3.11%) in the single-hook group and 19 cases (0.67%) in the double-hook group. Based on laparoscopic findings, recurrence most probably resulted from multiple factors, including uneven tension of the ligation (10 cases), missing part of the peritoneum (14 cases), loose ligation (8 cases), broken knot (5 cases), and knot reaction (2 cases). All children who underwent repeat SPLPEC were cured by double ligations or reinforcement with medial umbilical ligament.

CONCLUSION

The main cause of recurrence is improper ligation. Tension-free and complete PIH ligation are critical to the success of surgery, which requires avoiding the peritoneum skip area and the subcutaneous and muscular tissues. Redo-laparoscopic surgery was suitable for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia (RIH). For giant hernias, direct ligation of the internal ring incorporating the medial umbilical ligament (DIRIM) may be needed.

Laparoscopically Assisted Percutaneous Inguinal Ring Closure for Resolution of Inguinal/Scrotal Hernias in Rams: Cadaveric Study and Three Cases Report

The aim of this study is to evaluate a laparoscopically assisted percutaneous suture (LAPS) procedure to treat inguinal hernia (IH) while preserving testicles in rams. An ex vivo experiment with six ram cadavers and a report of three clinical cases are discussed. In cadavers, both internal inguinal rings (IIR) were partially closed by LAPS. Two LAPS methods were tested: (1) using a laparoscopic portal closure device and (2) using a suture loop inserted through needles in each IIR. After each procedure, the closure was laparoscopically evaluated and the number of U- sutures was recorded. The procedure was also performed on three client-owned rams with unilateral non-strangulated IH and the occurrence of re-herniation was followed up. In cadavers, LAPS of the IIRs could be easily and satisfactorily performed with either of the two systems, requiring one to three U-sutures per IIR. No differences were observed between the two surgical procedures. In two clinical cases, the procedure was successfully performed without reoccurrence of herniation or alterations in reproductive behavior in the following 3 and 6 months. In the third case, the hernia was reduced but a retroperitoneal emphysema during laparoscopy prevented hernioplasty and the animal herniated again. In conclusion, LAPS of IIR can be used as a simple and feasible treatment to preserve testicles in rams with IH.

Reduction of recurrence by peritoneal thermal injury in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring for inguinal hernia in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of peritoneal thermal injury (PTI) in the reduction of recurrence incidence in laparoscopic percutaneous extra-peritoneal closure of internal ring (LPEC) for pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) in children.

METHODS

Medical records of patients undergoing LPEC for PIH at our center were reviewed and divided into 2 groups: Group A (period from June 2017 to December 2017)-without PTI and Group B (period from January 2018 to December 2018) with PTI. The surgical technique and the type of suture used for LPEC were the same for both groups. The outcomes of the two groups were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

277 patients with 283 IHs in group A were compared to 376 patients with 389 IHs in group B. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, uni- or bilateral hernia. At a median follow-up period of 48 months, there was no hydrocele, suture granuloma, testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic cryptorchidism in both groups. The recurrence rate in group A was 6.4%, significantly higher than 1.8% in group B (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that PTI in LPEC for PIH is safe and associated with a significant reduction of recurrence incidence.

Laparoscopic percutaneous closure of patent processus vaginalis without hydrocelectomy for childhood primary hydrocele

PURPOSE

To present our surgical technique and the outcome of single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SILPEC) of patent processus vaginalis (PPV) without hydrocelectomy for childhood primary hydrocele (CPH).

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on all cases of CPH treated with SILPEC at our center between June 2016 and December 2021. In our SILPEC procedure, PPV was closed extraperitoneally using a percutaneous needle with a wire lasso. No hydrocelectomy or fenestration of the hydrocele was performed. Percutaneous aspiration was performed when the hydrocele fluid could not be pushed back to the peritoneal cavity.

RESULTS

553 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 34 months (range from 22 months to 13 years). Ipsilateral PPV was present in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversion. At follow-up 6-72 months, recurrent hydrocele occurred in 0.36%, and subcutaneous stitch inflammatory reaction was noted in 0.7%. There was no case of testicular atrophy or iatrogenic cryptorchidism. Postoperative cosmesis was excellent as all patients were virtually scarless.

CONCLUSIONS

Ipsilateral PPV was present in all cases of CPH in our series. Our technique of SILPEC of PPV without hydrocelectomy is feasible and safe, with excellent postoperative cosmesis in the management of CPH.

Comparing Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy in Newborns and Infants

BACKGROUND

As surgical techniques progress, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is now performed more often in premature babies. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of newborns and infants who underwent single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (SILH) at our center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients younger than 12 months old who received SILH at our department from 2016 to 2020. SILH involved a 5 mm 30-degree scope and 3 mm instruments with a 3-0 Silk purse-string intracorporeal suture for closure of the internal ring. At the time of surgery, Group 1 newborns, whose corrected age was 2 months and below, were compared to the Group 2 infants, whose age was above 2 months. We assessed the patients' characteristics, anesthesia, surgical data, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients were included (114 newborns in Group 1 and 83 infants in Group 2). The mean age and body weight in Group 1 were 1.2 months and 3.8 kg, respectively, whereas in Group 2, they were 3.2 months and 6.7 kg, respectively. There were no significant differences in operative time (Group 1 = 34.1 min vs. Group 2 = 32.3 min, p = 0.26), anesthetic time (Group 1 = 80.0 min vs. Group 2 = 76.3 min, p = 0.07), length of hospitalization (Group 1 = 2.3 days vs. Group 2 = 2.4 days, p = 0.88), postoperative complications including omphalitis (Group 1 = 5.3% vs. Group 2 = 1.2%, p = 0.13), wound infection (Group 1 = 0.9% vs. Group 2 = 1.2%, p = 0.81), and hydrocele (Group 1 = 0.35% vs. Group 2 = 8.4%, p = 0.14). No recurrence, testicular ascent or atrophy, or mortality was observed in either group during the 2-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is a safe and effective operation for inguinal hernia repair in infants, even those with prematurity, lower body weight at the time of surgery, or cardiac and/or pulmonary comorbidities. Comparable results revealed no significant differences in perioperative complications despite younger ages and lower body weights.

Review and Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on the Management of Pediatric Inguinal Hernias: A Descriptive Study

INTRODUCTION

Research quality in pediatric surgery has been challenged by multiple factors, including the low incidence of some congenital pathologies and rare event rates. With the rapid increase of pediatric surgical literature, there is a need for systematic reviews to synthesize evidence. It is important to assess the quality of these systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to examine the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, using inguinal hernia repair as an index diagnosis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of interventions on inguinal hernia in the pediatric population. The quality reporting was assessed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2 tools.

RESULTS

Of 1449 unique reports, 21 studies were included (15 meta-analyses and six systematic reviews). Median percent reported items for PRISMA and AMSTAR 2 were 72.2% and 70.5%, respectively. The least reported items in PRISMA were protocol registration (27.6%), synthesis of results (13.0%), and a risk of bias across studies (20.6%). For AMSTAR 2, the least reported items were reporting of source of funding (14.3%), appropriate methods for statistical combination of results (25.0%), and pre-establishment of protocol (28.6%). All critical items were completely or partially fulfilled in 5/21 (23.8%) of the studies and completely absent in 1/21 (4.8%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study highlight relatively good reporting quality, yet a poor methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in the pediatric surgery literature on inguinal hernia management.

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal internal ring closure for paediatric inguinal hernia using a needle grasper

BACKGROUND

Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure has been widely used for the repair of paediatric inguinal hernia. In this study, we aimed to introduce the usage of a needle grasper in single-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in children.

METHODS

In our study, 447 children with inguinal hernia underwent single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure between October 2018 and October 2021 in Shenzhen Children' hospital were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 447 patients, there were 396 males and 51 females with a mean age of 2.24 ± 0.36 years. A contralateral patent processus vaginalis was present in 165 unilateral hernia patients. All patients underwent laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure successfully without converting to open operation. The mean operating time in unilateral and bilateral hernia patients were 10.23 ± 2.25 mine and 14.54 ± 2.81 mine respectively. One patient had subcutaneous emphysema, two male patients had inguinal hernia recurrence and none had complications such as hydrocele and testicular atrophy. Additional 0.3 cm port was done in 4 cases. The mean follow-up time was 22.36 ± 4.56 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of paediatric inguinal hernia using a needle grasper is a feasible and safe procedure. It has the advantages of fewer skin surgical incisions, short operating time, low complication and low recurrence rate.

Comparison of laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure versus open repair for pediatric inguinal hernia

Background

Laparoscopic-assisted repairs for pediatric inguinal hernia have gained gradual acceptance over the past decade. However, consensus about the optimal management is still lacking. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of a modified laparoscope-assisted single-needle laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) versus open repair of pediatric hernias/hydrocele in a single institution.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of children who underwent laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC and open repair (OR) for inguinal hernia from 2014 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, laterality of hernia, surgical time and time to follow-up. We also reviewed and analyzed the evidence of recurrence, the incidence of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), and other complications.

Results

In our cohort, 961 patients in the OR group and 1098 patients in the LPEC group were analyzed retrospectively. Mean operative time was significantly shorter in the LPEC group (22.3 ± 3.5 min) than in the OR group (27.8 ± 5.9 min) for bilateral hernia repair (p < 0.001). Postoperative recurrence was 1.3% (13/1035) in the OR group and 0.5% (6/1182) in the LPEC group (p = 0.056). Iatrogenic cryptorchidism occurred statistically more frequently in the OR group than in the LPEC group (0.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.013). In addition, the incidence of MCIH was 3.7% (33/887) in the OR group and 0.3% (3/1014) in the LPEC group (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Comparing to open technique, laparoscope-assisted single-needle LPEC provides a simple and effective option for pediatric inguinal hernia/hydrocele repair with excellent outcomes, a low incidence of recurrence, and reduced MCIH.

Laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy in children: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernias (IHs) are sometimes encountered incidentally in children during laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy in children.

METHODS

A multicentric study was performed in patients with AA and concurrent IH who received laparoscopic simultaneous inguinal hernia repair and appendectomy (study group), compared with patients who underwent two-stage laparoscopic procedures (control group) between September 2012 and January 2020. Intraoperative data, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

189 patients with AA and concurrent IH (117 children in the study group, and 72 children in the control group) were enrolled. No significant differences in preoperative characteristics were identified between the two groups. Patients in the study group had a shorter total operative time and hospital stay than those in the control group (43.2 ± 8.1 vs 53.9 ± 7.3 min, p < 0.001; 1.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.2 ± 0.9 days, p = 0.023). The study group incurred lower costs than the control group (9198.7 ± 587.6 vs 14,392.5 ± 628.6 RMB, p < 0.001). During follow-up (range 1.5-6.0 years), three children in the study group and two children in the control group experienced wound infection. One child in the study group had recurrent IH.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic simultaneous procedures do not increase the incidence of wound infection or recurrent IH. Moreover, they avoid repeat anesthesia and hospitalization. Therefore, this approach is safe, feasible and cost-effective for children with AA and concurrent IH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Optimizing the Working Space for Single-Port Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Closure of Inguinal Hernia with TPV Protocol in Infants and Young Children

Purpose: To evaluate the outcomes of single-port laparoscopic internal ring closure of inguinal hernia, optimized according to TPV (tilt, pad, and void) protocol, in infants and young children. Methods: From August 2018 to March 2021, a prospective cohort study was conducted including 400 patients younger than 3 years with either left- or right-side inguinal hernia treated with single-port laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) closure of the internal ring using a two-hooked core needle apparatus. Patients whose hospitalization ID ended with an odd number were included in group A (n = 200). They were surgically treated with single-port laparoscopy optimized according to TPV protocol, in which the operating table was placed at a 30° head-down tilt position (tilt), the hip was padded by 4-5 cm (pad), and the bladder was voided (void). The remaining patients in group B (n = 200) were conventionally treated with single-port laparoscopic TEP closure of the internal ring. Success rate of surgery, surgery duration, and postoperative complications of two groups were compared. Results: A significantly higher success rate of surgery was detected in group A than in group B (198/200 versus 182/200, P < .05). Regardless of unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia, surgery duration was significantly shorter in group A than in group B (unilateral inguinal hernia, 14.38 ± 2.85 minutes versus 21.17 ± 4.47 minutes; bilateral inguinal hernia, 20.73 ± 4.58 minutes versus 28.99 ± 4.12 minutes, both P < .05). In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in group A (1/200 versus 8/200). Conclusions: TPV protocol to optimize working space for single-port laparoscopic TEP closure of inguinal hernia can increase the success rate, shorten surgery duration, and decrease the incidence of postoperative complications.

Modified Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Using a Sledge-Shaped Needle for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele in 1199 Pediatric Patients

Background: The objective of the study is to determine the safety and efficiency of the modified laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) to treat pediatric patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele. Methods: From January 2014 to July 2018, the patients with inguinal hernia or hydrocele who were operated on using modified LPEC were included. We modified LPEC with a sledge-shaped needle and reinforcement flag. By means of medial umbilical fold, the reinforcement surgery should be performed on the patients with huge internal rings (diameter >1.5 cm). Operative time, complication rate, incidence of reinforcement, and contralateral patent processus vaginalis were described between inguinal hernia and hydrocele. Results: In this study, 764 patients with inguinal hernia and 435 patients with hydrocele were successfully performed by the modified LPEC. The 383 (50.1%) patients with inguinal hernia and 266 (61.1%) patients with hydrocele were identified with a contralateral patency of internal ring and underwent simultaneous prophylactic surgery. During surgical procedures, the medial umbilical fold reinforcement (inguinal hernia/hydrocele = 50/1) was performed on 51 patients. Hernia recurrence occurred in 2 cases. All patients had a good cosmetic appearance without additional dissection. Conclusion: Modified LPEC using a sledge-shaped needle and applying the medial umbilical fold reinforcement is a safe and effective surgical procedure.

Single Incision Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure of Internal Ring for Incarcerated Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Single Center Experience with 104 Cases

Introduction: The aim of this report is to present our technique and outcomes of single incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring (SILPEC) for incarcerated inguinal hernia (IIH) in children. Patients and Methods: The medical records of all children undergoing emergency SILPEC for IIH after unsuccessful attempted manual reduction between June 2016 and September 2020 at our center were reviewed. For SILPEC, two trocars 3.5-6 mm were placed through a single umbilical incision. A 17G epidural needle and a small wire-lasso were used for extraperitoneal closure of the internal ring. Results: From a total of 2904 consecutive patients with inguinal hernia (IH) undergoing SILPEC, 104 patients (3.6%) had IIH. There were 84 boys and 20 girls with a median age of 18.5 months (ranged 1 month to 11 years). At the time of surgery under general anesthesia IIH was found to be spontaneously reduced in 26.9%; the hernia contents were bowel in 52.9%, great omentum in 13.5%, and ovary in 6.7% of the patients. All hernias were successfully reduced without additional ports or conversion to open surgery. Patent contralateral processus vaginalis (PCPV) was detected intraoperatively in 44.2% of the cases. The median operative time was 24 minutes for unilateral and 30 minutes for bilateral procedures. The median postoperative stay was 1 day. At a median follow-up of 28 months, there was no case of hydrocele, testicular atrophy, or iatrogenic cryptorchism. The postoperative cosmesis was excellent as all patients were virtually scarless. Recurrence occurred in 1.9% with no significant difference (P = .669) compared to the 1.4% recurrence rate of the 2800 patients with ordinary IH undergoing elective SILPEC during the same study period. Conclusions: SILPEC for IIH in children is feasible, safe, with excellent postoperative cosmesis, and no significant difference in hernia recurrence between emergency SILPEC for IIH and elective SILPEC for ordinary IH.

Comparison of intra- and extra-corporeal laparoscopic hernia repair in children: A systematic review and pooled data-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly used to repair paediatric inguinal hernias and can be divided into intra- or extra-corporeal closing techniques. No statement regarding the superiority of one of the two techniques can be made. This study aims to provide evidence supporting the superiority of intra- or extra-corporeal suturing technique.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomised controlled trials and prospective studies comparing different laparoscopic techniques were eligible for inclusion. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, comparing single-port extra-peritoneal closure to intra-peritoneal purse string suture closing. Primary outcome was recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery (min), peri‑ and post-operative complications (i.e. injury of spermatic vessels or spermatic cord, tuba lesions, bleeding and apnoea, haematoma/scrotal oedema, hydrocele, wound infection, iatrogenic ascent of the testis and testicular atrophy), contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV) rate, post-operative pain, length of hospital stay and cosmetic appearance of the wound.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 3680 patients, age range 0.5-12 years, follow-up range 3-10 months) were included is this systematic review. Intra-corporeal hernia repair was performed in 738 children and extra-corporeal repair was performed in 2942 children. A pooled data analysis could only be performed for the single port extra-corporeal closing technique and the three port intra-corporeal closing technique. We found that recurrence rate was lower in the single-port extra-corporeal closing technique compared to the intra-corporeal purse suture closing technique (0.6% vs 5.5%, 95% CI 0.107 (0.024-0.477); p < 0.001). Operation time was shorter for extra-corporeal unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia repair compared with intra-corporeal approach, but no pooled data analysis could be performed. Due to the presence of substantial heterogeneity, it was not possible to assess other outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Single-port extra-corporeal closure seems to result in less recurrent hernias and a shorter operative time compared to intra-corporeal purse suture closing technique. No difference regarding peri‑ and post-operative complications could be found and no statements regarding the length of hospital admission, post-operative pain and cosmetics could be made due to substantial heterogeneity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Re-evaluation of jumping purse-string suturing in pediatric laparoscopic hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Reported recurrence rates using jumping purse-string suturing in laparoscopic hernia repair (LH) are higher than that of intact purse-string. This study aims to compare the outcomes of LH using transabdominal jumping purse-string suturing (TJS) with those using transabdominal intact purse-string suturing (TIS) and percutaneous extraperitoneal intact purse-string suturing (PEIS).

METHODS

A total of 3340 patients from three centers who have undergone laparoscopic hernia repair from January 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 1460 patients received TJS, 724 patients received TIS, and 1006 patients received PEIS. One hundred and fifty patients were excluded due to the loss of follow-up. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

The hernia distribution characteristics and mean length of hospital stay were similar among the three groups (p > 0.05, p > 0.05). While the overall complication rates were similar among the three groups (0.34% in TJS vs. 0.41% in TIS vs. 0.50% in PEIS, TJS & TIS p = 0.502; TJS & PEIS p = 0.813), the incidence of intraoperative hematoma in TIS group and postoperative subcutaneous knot in PEIS group was significantly higher ((0.83% in TIS and 0.34% in TJS vs. 0.2% in PEIS, TJS & TIS p = 0.018; TJS & PEIS p = 0.163), (0% in TIS and 0% in TJS vs. 0.2% in PEIS, TJS & TIS p = 0.415; TJS & PEIS p = 0.025)). There were no differences in the recurrent rate in both unilateral and bilateral cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Transabdominal jumping purse-string suturing is not associated with a higher recurrence rate and is the recommended surgical approach.

Fascinating history of groin hernias: Comprehensive recognition of anatomy, classic considerations for herniorrhaphy, and current controversies in hernioplasty

Groin hernias include indirect inguinal, direct inguinal, femoral, obturator, and supravesical hernias. Here, we summarize historical turning points, anatomical recognition and surgical repairs. Groin hernias have a fascinating history in the fields of anatomy and surgery. The concept of tension-free repair is generally accepted among clinicians. Surgical repair with mesh is categorized as hernioplasty, while classic repair without mesh is considered herniorrhaphy. Although various surgical approaches have been developed, the surgical technique should be carefully chosen for each patient. Regarding as interesting history, crucial anatomy and important surgeries in the field of groin hernia, we here summarized them in detail, respectively. Points of debate are also reviewed; important points are shown using illustrations and schemas. We hope this systematic review is surgical guide for general surgeons including residents. Both a skillful technique and anatomical knowledge are indispensable for successful hernia surgery in the groin.

Long-term absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring for inguinal hernia in children

AIM

To compare the results of using long-term absorbable (LTAS) versus non-absorbable suture (NAS) in laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure of internal ring (LPEC) for indirect inguinal hernia (IH) in children METHODS: Prospectively collected data from children undergoing LPEC for IH at our center were retrospectively reviewed to compare group A repaired with NAS (2.0 monofilament polypropylene or braided polytetrafluoroethilene) to group B repaired with LTAS 2.0 polydioxanone.

RESULTS

481 patients with 499 IHs in group A were compared to 277 patients with 283 IHs in group B. There were no significant differences in terms of age, bodyweight and laterality of IH between the two groups. At a median follow up period of 30 months, the incidence of suture knot reaction (SKR) and hernia recurrence were 3.1% and 1.0% in group A vs. 0% and 6.4% in group B with p = 0.002 and p<0.001, respectively. Monofilament NAS was associated with a low rate of both recurrence and SKR.

CONCLUSIONS

LPEC repair for pediatric IH using LTAS is associated with no SKR but a higher recurrence rate compared to NAS. Monofilament NAS such as Prolene could be a good choice in LPEC because of its low rate of both recurrence and SKR.

Umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for patent processus vaginalis in boys: incision-hiding and solo-like surgery

Background

Transumbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for the treatment of processus vaginalis patency in boys has been practising recent years. The applicable instruments and skills are still evolving. In this study, we used a self-made needle assisted by a disposable dissecting forceps to practise this minimal invasive method for patent processus vaginalis in boys. Its safety and effectiveness were studied. The methods for depth and orientation perceptions were analyzed.

Methods

From January 2020 to November 2020, boys characteristic of symtomatic patency of processus vaginalis were performed open surgery consecutively. From December 2020, the authors begun to propose transumbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for this kind of boy patients. The open group included fifteen boys and the laparoscopic group included ten ones. The data of the patients age, constituent ratios of unilateral and bilateral patency, operating time, postoperative stay in hospital, follow-up time, conversion, postoperative complications were assessed. Throughout the laparoscopic process, the parallel and synchronous movements of lens pole and dissecting forceps were maintained. Vas deferens protrude was imagined as one of the point to form the triangular manipulation plane.

Results

There were no statistically significant difference between the laparoscopic group and the open group for the following items: age, operating time, the constituent ratios of unilateral or bilateral patency of processus vaginalis (P > 0.05). Postoperative stay in hospital and follow-up time of the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that of the open group (P = 0.0000). No laparoscopic case was converted to open surgery. After 10 cases of laparoscopic practice, orientation perception was established. There were no postoperative complications for all the patients.

Conclusion

Our preliminary experience suggested that umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure is safe and convenient for patent processus vaginalis treatment in boys. It has the advantage of incision-hiding and can be manipulated like a solo-like surgery.

Laparoscopic vs. Open Repair Surgery for the Treatment of Communicating Hydrocele in Children: A Retrospective Study From a Single Center

Purpose: This study evaluated the outcomes of laparoscopic repair (LR) and open repair (OR) surgery for communicating hydrocele in children.

Patients and Methods: We collected the clinical data and follow-up data of all boys (<14 years) who underwent communicating hydrocele surgery in the pediatric surgery department at Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College from January 2017 to December 2018 and retrospectively analyzed the data.

Results: In this study, 155 patients were retrospectively enrolled, including 90 patients in the OR group and 65 patients in the LR group. There were significant differences in operation time and the recurrence of hydrocele between the two groups. The persistence of scrotal swelling in the LR group was significantly lower than that in the OR group. There was no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time or incision infection rate between the two groups.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study shows that laparoscopic treatment of children with communicating hydrocele has the advantages of a hidden incision, a shortened operation time, and a reduced postoperative recurrence rate and can be used as the preferred surgical method. However, laparoscopic treatment should be selected according to the specific condition of each child and cannot completely replace traditional open surgery.

Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Repair of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Using Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing

Background: Percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) is a simple and popular technique for the treatment of inguinal hernia in children. The aim of this study was to analyze the learning curves during implementation of PIRS in our department. Methods: A total of 318 pediatric patients underwent hernia repair using the PIRS technique by three pediatric surgeons with different levels of experience in laparoscopic surgery. These patients were enrolled in a prospective cohort study during the period October 2015–January 2021. Surgical times, intraoperative and postoperative complications, in addition to outcomes of treatment were compared among the pediatric surgeons. Results: Regarding operative time a significant difference among the surgeons was found. Operative time significantly decreased after 25–30 procedures per surgeon. The surgeon with advanced experience in laparoscopic surgery had significantly less operative times for both unilateral (12 (interquartile range, IQR 10.5, 16.5) min vs. 21 (IQR 16.5, 28) min and 25 (IQR 21.5, 30) min; p = 0.002) and bilateral (19 (IQR 14, 21) min vs. 28 (IQR 25, 33) min and 31 (IQR 24, 36) min; p = 0.0001) hernia repair, compared to the other two surgeons. Perioperative complications, conversion, and ipsilateral recurrence rates were higher at the beginning, reaching the benchmarks when each surgeon performed at least 30 PIRS procedures. The most experienced surgeon had the lowest number of complications (1.4%) and needed a fewer number of cases to reach the plateau. The other two surgeons with less experience in laparoscopic surgery had higher rates of complications (4.4% and 5.4%) and needed a higher number of cases to reach the plateau (p = 0.190). Conclusions: A PIRS learning curve for perioperative and postoperative complications, recurrences, and conversion rates reached the plateau after each surgeon had performed at least 30 cases. After that number of cases PIRS is a safe and effective approach for pediatric hernia repair. A surgeon with an advanced level of experience in pediatric laparoscopic surgery adopted the technique more easily and had a significantly faster learning curve.

Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing for the Minimal Invasive Treatment of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A 5-Year Single Surgeon Experience

PURPOSE

Percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique of laparoscopic hernia repair in children under the control of a laparoscope placed in the umbilicus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management and postoperative outcomes of PIRS for inguinal hernia repair in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All children who underwent PIRS for an inguinal hernia, between February 2015 and February 2020, were included in the prospective cohort study. The following parameters were recorded: age, gender, body mass index, lateralization of hernia, surgical and anesthesia times, level of pneumoperitoneum, additional trocar introduction, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative or postoperative complications and recurrences were recorded.

RESULTS

A total number of 228 PIRS procedures were performed in 188 children [126 (67%) male individuals and 62 (33%) female individuals] with a median age of 4 [interquartile range (IQR), 2 to 6] years and a median follow-up of 46 (IQR, 38 to 52) months. From the total number of hernia repairs there were 99 (52.7%) right, 49 (26.1%) left, and 40 (21.2%) bilateral hernia repairs. Median surgical time was 10 (IQR, 8 to 12) minutes for unilateral and 16 (IQR, 14 to 20) minutes for a bilateral repair. The median hospital stay was 24 (IQR, 8 to 24) hours. Regarding intraoperative complications, only 3 (1.3%) inferior epigastric veins injuries were recorded, without any consequences. During the follow-up period in 3 male children, hydrocele was recorded; in 2 cases, hydrocele resolved spontaneously and 1 required surgical treatment. No cases of other complications including testicular atrophy or recurrence were recorded.

CONCLUSION

In a hands of an experienced pediatric laparoscopic surgeon, PIRS is a simple, safe, and effective technique for inguinal hernia repair in children with excellent outcomes, cosmetic results, and a low incidence of complications and recurrence.

Percutaneous hernia repair in children: Safe to introduce

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In 2014 we introduced percutaneous internal ring suture as an alternative to open surgery for the treatment of inguinal hernia. This study aims to evaluate the introduction of the procedure at our institution.

METHODS

In total, 100 consecutive patients operated with percutaneous internal ring suture were compared with 100 consecutive patients operated with open surgery. The patients were operated from August 2014 until November 2017. Patient demographics, clinical history, operative time, time in theater, and postoperative complications were extracted from charts.

RESULTS

The mean operative time for percutaneous internal ring suture was 26.54 min and for open surgery 39.94 min, P < 0.0001. The total mean operative theater time for percutaneous internal ring suture was 108.95 min and for open surgery 118.4 min, P = 0.0343. During follow-up, two percutaneous internal ring sutures were operated for recurrent hernia. In the open surgery-group, three patients were operated for recurrent hernia, three for secondary testicular retention, and three for metachronous contralateral hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

Even when established as a new technique, the percutaneous internal ring suture procedure is safe and results in shorter operative time and shorter theater time compared to open surgery.

Single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) of hernia sac high ligation using an ordinary taper needle: a novel technique for pediatric inguinal hernia

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic high ligation of the internal inguinal ring is an alternative procedure for treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH), with a major trend toward increasing use of extracorporeal knotting and decreasing use of working ports. We have utilized this laparoscopic technique to treat the entire spectrum of PIH (including incarcerated cases) for more than 17 years, and the technique continues to evolve and improve. We herein report our latest modification of this minimally invasive technique, namely single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) of hernia sac high ligation using an ordinary taper needle, and evaluate its safety and efficacy.

METHODS

From July 2016 to July 2019, 790 children with indirect PIH were treated by laparoscopic surgery. All patients underwent high ligation surgery with a modified single-site laparoscopic technique mainly performed by extracorporeal suturing with an ordinary closed-eye taper needle (1/2 arc 11 × 34). The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All surgeries were successful without serious complications. A contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV) was found intraoperatively and subsequently repaired in 190 patients (25.4%). The mean operative time was 15 min (8-25 min) for 557 unilateral hernias and 21 min (14-36 min) for 233 bilateral hernias. The mean postoperative stay was 20 h. Minor complications occurred in five patients (0.63%) and were managed properly, with no major impact on the final outcomes. No recurrence was noted in the patients who were followed up for 6-42 months. No obvious scar was present postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Modified SLPEC of hernia sac high ligation using an ordinary taper needle for repair of indirect PIH is a safe, reliable, and minimally invasive procedure with satisfactory outcome, with no special device being needed. It is easy to learn and perform and is worthy of popularization in the clinical setting.

Incidence of Cord Hydrocele After Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Inguinal Hernia Repair in Male Pediatric Patients: A Comparative Study Between Removing and Leaving the Hernial Sac

Purpose: Many laparoscopic repair techniques are available for treating pediatric inguinal hernias. The development of a cord hydrocele (CH) after laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair (LPIHR) in male patients can lead to reoperation. We performed the present study to evaluate the effects of hernial sac removal on the occurrence of CH after laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair in male patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 3145 male pediatric patients aged <10 years who underwent LPIHR from January 2014 to March 2017. We categorized patients into two groups according to the operative technique: Group 1 (high ligation without hernial sac removal, 1592 patients) and Group 2 (high ligation with hernial sac removal, 1553 patients). We removed the hernial sacs in the first half of the study period and not in the second half of the study period. We analyzed the surgical outcomes in both groups after the same follow-up period of ≥2.5 years. Results: We found no significant differences in demographic or clinical parameters between the treatment groups. CH occurred in 6 patients in Group 1 only; no patients in Group 2 developed CH (0.38% [6/1592] versus 0.00% [0/1553], respectively; P = .044). The interval from the initial hernia repair to the hydrocelectomy in 6 patients was 20.8 months. The recurrence rate was higher in Group 1 (0.4%, 7/1592) versus Group 2 (0.0%, 0/1553) (P = .025). In the logistic regression test, Group 2 predicted a lower CH occurrence rate than Group 1 (odds ratio = 1.004, 95% confidence interval = 1.001-1.007; P = .016). Conclusion: Our findings indicated that hernial sac removal resulted in a small but significant decrease in the risk of postoperative CH.

Outcomes of laparoscopic incarcerated inguinal hernia repair in children

AIM

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) is gaining widespread acceptance, but its role in the management of incarcerated cases is not well outlined. This review analyses the outcomes of laparoscopic repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Literature was searched on PubMed® using terms 'laparoscopic', 'incarcerated', 'inguinal', 'hernia' and 'children'. Age, sex, side, sac content, operative technique, follow-up period, complication and recurrence rate were analysed.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles with 689 paediatric incarcerated inguinal hernias were identified between 1998 and 2018. Median age of patients was 22.4 months (2 weeks-16 years; M:F = 2.2:1). Side was mentioned in n = 576: n = 398 (69.1%) right and n = 178 (30.9%) left. In n = 355 (51.5%) manual reduction and delayed surgery (MRDS), in n = 34 (4.9%) manual reduction in general anaesthesia (MRGA) followed by emergency LHR and in n = 300 (43.5%) intraoperative reduction (IOR) was necessary. Incarcerated contents were documented in n = 68: intestine n = 36 (52.9%), ovary n = 14 (20.6%), omentum n = 11 (16.2%), appendix n = 5 (7.4%) and Meckel's diverticulum n = 2 (2.9%). Among the n = 18 girls in IOR group, n = 14 (77.8%) had ovaries incarcerated. For LHR, the hook method was used in 376 (54.6%) and purse-string suture in 313 (45.4%), with two conversions in IOR group. Mean followup was 15 months (3-80 months), with one (0.15%) testicular atrophy, and 4 (0.58%) recurrences in MRDS and 1 (0.15%) in IOR. All five cases were closed with pursestring technique. Total recurrence rate was 0.73%; significantly higher (P = 0.014) with pursestring (n = 5, 1.6%) than with the hook (none).

CONCLUSION

Hook and purse-string methods are equally popular in LHR for paediatric incarcerated hernias, with 50% hernia reductions possible at the time of surgery. Recurrence rate is low and comparable with non-incarcerated hernias; however, it is significantly higher in purse-string method than hook technique.

The Ideal Candidate for Subcutaneous Endoscopically Assisted Ligation (SEAL) of the Internal Ring for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Repair

Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation (SEAL) technique is an effective and minimally invasive approach for indirect inguinal hernia repair in children. Not all patients are candidates for SEAL because of technical limitations. We hypothesized that preoperatively assessed patient-level factors may predict technical feasibility of SEAL repair. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent indirect inguinal hernia repair between June 2012 and December 2014. All patients younger than two years and any patient older than two years who had a concomitant umbilical hernia were considered candidates for diagnostic laparoscopy with SEAL repair. We compared patients who had SEAL repair with those who had diagnostic laparoscopy with conversion to open repair. Univariate statistics was performed using the chi-squared and Student's t test. One hundred forty-one patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy with intent to perform a SEAL repair. Seventeen patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 124 patients, 66 had SEAL repairs, 35 had open repairs, and 23 had a SEAL repair with contralateral open repair. Patient age, BMI, gender, history of prematurity, and history of incarcerated hernia were similar between the SEAL and open groups. Sixty-two per cent of hernias were able to be repaired with SEAL technique. Hernia recurrence was seen in 3 of 123 total SEAL repairs and in 1 of 74 open repairs. The recurrence rate for SEAL repairs (2.4%) was not significantly different from the recurrence rate for open repairs (1.4%). No preoperative patient-level factors predicted technical inability to perform a successful SEAL repair. In this series, the recurrence risk of SEAL compared with open repair was low and not statistically significant. For practitioners with minimally invasive experience, SEAL should be considered a safe and successful option for inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients undergoing routine diagnostic laparoscopy.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Adaptations and New Frontiers

As the frontiers of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) continue to expand, the availability and implementation of new technology in pediatric urology are increasing. MIS is already an integral part of pediatric urology, but there is still much more potential change to come as both recent and upcoming advances in laparoscopic and robotic surgery are surveyed.

Single-Site Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Versus Modified Transumbilical Two-Port Laparoscopic Suturing of the Hernia Sac for the Treatment of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: Comparison of the Outcomes of Two Different Approaches

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) and modified transumbilical two-port laparoscopic suturing (M-TTLS) of the hernia sac for the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) and determine whether one approach was superior to another.

METHODS

From January 2014 to June 2017, a total of 599 children had undergone SLPEC or M-TTLS in our department. SLPEC and M-TTLS were the most frequently performed single-site laparoscopic procedures for PIH in our department, which represented the extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches, respectively. All patients were followed up at the out-patients' clinics and the medical records were reviewed with respect to all operative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 412 patients undergoing SLPEC and 187 patients undergoing M-TTLS, of which 358 hernias were on the right side, 172 on the left and 69 bilaterally. Two hundred and thirty-one unilateral hernias with contralateral patent processus vaginalis underwent contralateral repair at the same session. Mean operation time was 10.81 minutes in unilateral repair and 17.00 minutes in bilateral repairs, respectively. The perioperative complications included minor extraperitoneal hematoma in four (0.44%) patients, recurrence in one (0.11%), hydrocele in five (0.56%), and contralateral metachronous inguinal hernia in three (1.00%). No other complication developed in either group. There was no significant difference of complications between the two approaches except for the longer operation time in M-TTLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SLPEC and M-TTLS were the safe and effective methods for PIH. The complications were comparable for M-TTLS and SLPEC, but operation time was significantly longer in M-TTLS than in SLPEC.

Effectiveness of Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Pediatric Hydrocele: A Systematic Review

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the published studies concerning laparoscopic pediatric hydrocele (PH) repair and summarize the surgical details and operative outcomes of this procedure. Materials and Methods: A PubMed search was performed for all studies concerning laparoscopic repair of hydrocele in children. The search strategy was as follows: (laparoscop* OR coelioscop* OR peritoneoscop* OR laparoendoscop* OR minilaparoscop*) AND hydrocele* AND (child* OR pediatric*). Inclusion criteria included (1) children with hydrocele as the study participant; (2) laparoscopic PH repair as the main surgical procedure; and (3) operation time and complications as the outcomes of interest. Reviews, studies with insufficient information or reporting the outcomes of abdominoscrotal hydrocele, and duplicate patient series were excluded. Results: Overall, 20 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this review and 15 studies were included in the final analysis. These studies comprised at least 2920 patients undergoing laparoscopic repair for various PH subtypes, of which most were conducted in Asia. Most authors repaired PH laparoscopically through an extraperitoneal approach, while only a few studies applied a laparoscopic intraperitoneal method. The majority of the studies used nonabsorbable sutures to ligate hydrocele sac, while very few studies used absorbable materials. Hydrocele sac was resected or transected in only five studies, but left alone in the majority. Mean operation time was between 15.6 and 43.2 minutes for unilateral laparoscopic PH repair and between 16.9 and 53.2 minutes for bilateral surgery. Operative complications were not very common, with a highest recurrence/persistence incidence of 1.4%. Subgroup analysis showed that hydrocele subtype, surgical approach, suture material, and management of hydrocele sac did not significantly influence the operative complications. Conclusions: laparoscopic PH repair seems to be a safe and effective procedure. Given the limitations of this review, our conclusion needs to be confirmed by more well-designed studies.

Single-Site Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we summarize research that has evaluated the role of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) and robotic surgery in pediatric urology, highlighting new and/or controversial ideas.

RECENT FINDINGS

The newest research developments over the last several years are studies that address generalizability of these techniques, ideal patient factors, extrapolation to more complex surgeries, and comparative studies to more traditional techniques to define the associated costs and benefits, as well as patient-centered outcomes. Specifically in the field of LESS, addressing the limitations of suboptimal vision, instrument crowding, and loss of triangulation have been a focus. The literature is now replete with new applications for robotic surgery as well as descriptions of the specific technical challenges inherent to pediatrics. Robotic surgery and LESS are areas of growth in pediatric urology that allow continual innovation and expansion of technology within a surgeon's armamentarium.

Is two-port laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (T-LESS) feasible for pediatric hydroceles? Single-center experience with the initial 59 cases

INTRODUCTION

Although T-LESS is increasingly being used to treat pediatric inguinal hernia, there is no study regarding T-LESS for pediatric hydrocele.

OBJECTIVE

To further evaluate the feasibility of T-LESS and present our single-center experience for repair of pediatric hydroceles.

STUDY DESIGN

From January 2016 to July 2016, all boys undergoing T-LESS for hydrocele in our institute were retrospectively reviewed. A laparoscope and a needle-holding forceps were introduced at umbilicus. A round needle with silk suture was stabbed through the abdominal wall. The peritoneum around the internal ring was sutured continuously in a clockwise direction. After a complete purse-string suture, a triple knot was performed by using a single-instrument tie technique. The contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV) was repaired simultaneously if present.

RESULTS

Overall, 59 boys with hydrocele were included (22 on the left side, 32 on the right side, and 5 bilaterally) (Table). During the procedure, all hydroceles were observed with a PPV but the fluid needed to be aspired in 39 boys. A contralateral PPV was present in 24 boys with unilateral hydrocele, and finally 88 repairs were performed. Mean operative time was 18.3 min for unilateral repair and 27.5 min for bilateral repair, respectively. All procedures were uneventful besides a minor injury to the inferior epigastric vessels. After a mean follow-up of 10.7 months, neither recurrence nor other postoperative complication was observed. There were no visible scars on the abdominal wall.

DISCUSSION

Compared with open repair of pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele, laparoscopic surgery had several advantages, such as exploration of contralateral PPV, identification of rare hernias, diminished postoperative pain, improved cosmesis, faster recovery, and fewer complications. Differing from the laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach, T-LESS included no subcutaneous tissue in the ligature, and its knot was completely in the peritoneal cavity which could radically prevent the severe pain and suture granuloma in the ligated region. Furthermore, the skin incisions after T-LESS were hidden in umbilicus, which could achieve an excellent cosmetic result. By performing T-LESS for pediatric hydroceles, the current study showed very satisfactory results, such as high success rate, minor complication, and excellent cosmesis. However, because of the difficult learning curve of T-LESS, some technical details (e.g. avoiding injury to the spermatic cord, completely suturing the peritoneal folds and reducing disturbance between the instruments) still need to be improved in the future.

CONCLUSION

T-LESS appears to be a safe and effective method for repair of pediatric hydroceles.

Learning Curves for Laparoscopic Repair of Inguinal Hernia and Communicating Hydrocele in Children

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed the department and surgeon learning curves during implementation of the percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique in our department.

METHODS

Children proposed for inguinal hernia or communicating hydrocele repair were included (n = 607). After mentorship, all surgeons were free to propose open or PIRS repair. From gathered data, we assessed department and surgeon learning curves through cumulative experience focusing in perioperative complications, conversion, ipsilateral recurrence, postoperative complications, and metachronous hernia, with benchmarks defined by open repair.

RESULTS

Department-centered analysis revealed that perioperative complications, conversion, and ipsilateral recurrence rates were higher in the beginning, reaching the benchmarks when each surgeon performed, at least, 35 laparoscopic repairs. Postoperative complications and metachronous hernia rates were independent from learning curves, with the metachronous hernia rate being significantly lower in PIRS patients. During the program, the percentage of males in those operated by PIRS progressively increased reaching the percentage of males, in our sample, when department operated over 230 cases.

CONCLUSION

Thirty-five laparoscopic cases per surgeon are required for perioperative complications, conversion, and ipsilateral recurrence reach the benchmark. The gap between the percentage of males, in those operated by PIRS and in those proposed for surgery, monitors the confidence of the team in the program.